Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2016 Jan 15;10(2):2485–2490. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b07328

Single Cesium Lead Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals at Low Temperature: Fast Single-Photon Emission, Reduced Blinking, and Exciton Fine Structure

Gabriele Rainò †,*, Georgian Nedelcu ‡,§, Loredana Protesescu ‡,§, Maryna I Bodnarchuk ‡,§, Maksym V Kovalenko ‡,§,*, Rainer F Mahrt , Thilo Stöferle †,*
PMCID: PMC4768330  PMID: 26771336

Abstract

graphic file with name nn-2015-073283_0007.jpg

Metal-halide semiconductors with perovskite crystal structure are attractive due to their facile solution processability, and have recently been harnessed very successfully for high-efficiency photovoltaics and bright light sources. Here, we show that at low temperature single colloidal cesium lead halide (CsPbX3, where X = Cl/Br) nanocrystals exhibit stable, narrow-band emission with suppressed blinking and small spectral diffusion. Photon antibunching demonstrates unambiguously nonclassical single-photon emission with radiative decay on the order of 250 ps, representing a significant acceleration compared to other common quantum emitters. High-resolution spectroscopy provides insight into the complex nature of the emission process such as the fine structure and charged exciton dynamics.

Keywords: perovskites, halides, quantum dots, nanocrystals, single photon sources, optoelectronics


The outstanding optoelectronic properties of metal–halide perovskites, in particular hybrid organic–inorganic lead halides (MAPbX3, where MA = methylammonium and X = Br, I) have recently fueled enormous interest in this class of materials.1,2 Inexpensive solar cells with conversion efficiencies of about 20% have been demonstrated using hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites.35 Astonishingly, the same material has also excellent emission properties,6 as was evidenced by optically pumped amplified spontaneous emission7 and lasing.8,9 All these applications are based on thin films that comprise microcrystalline perovskite structures. However, such ensembles of crystallites do not show strong quantum correlations between photons, even not on the level of a single microcrystal.10 Nonclassical light emission, which has been found in single organic dye molecules,11 semiconductor quantum dots1214 and color centers in diamond15,16 and other materials, has enabled superlocalization microscopy17 and deterministic single photon sources for secure quantum communication.18 It would be tantalizing to harness the high oscillator strength, high quantum yield, efficient charge transport, solution-processability and the simplicity of synthesis of these perovskites for such applications. Furthermore, being able to access single emitters circumvents averaging effects within the ensemble of microcrystallites that can cloak fundamental light absorption and emission processes, which are of key interest in the improvement of the photovoltaic and laser devices.

Very recently, fully inorganic nanocrystals (NCs) of perovskite-type cesium lead halides (CsPbX3, X = Cl, Br, I) have been synthesized with precise size- and compositional control, offering very bright, tunable, narrowband luminescence over the whole visible wavelength range.19 High defect tolerance and absence of detrimental mid-gap surface defects, commonly reported for hybrid organic–inorganic MAPbX3 thin-films,20 are clearly shared also by their CsPbX3 NCs cousins showing high room-temperature photoluminescence quantum yields of up to 90% without any additional surface passivation. This opened up a wealth of opportunities for tunable light sources based on compositional and quantum-size tuning,19 including recently demonstrated single-photon emission at room temperature.21 These investigations clearly highlighted the immediate potential for real-world applications such as backlighting in television displays and light-emitting diodes. However, the broad emission line width at room-temperature obscured many features of the underlying photophysics. Low temperature investigations could unveil a substantially different picture and provide deep insight into the fine structure, spectral diffusion and charged emitting states.

Here, we present a micro-photoluminescence study on single colloidal mixed-halide CsPb(Cl/Br)3 NCs of ca. 9.5 nm diameter (Figure 1a–c, Methods and Supporting Information) at low temperature (T = 6 K). In comparison to ensemble measurements of the same material, the spectral width of the photoluminescence (PL) is reduced from 25 to 1 meV full-width at half-maximum (fwhm) due to the absence of inhomogeneous broadening (Figure 1d). The emission peak energy is red-shifted by 95 meV compared to room temperature, due to the temperature-dependent deformation of the crystal lattice. Importantly, control experiments with X-ray diffraction (XRD) confirmed retention of the cubic perovskite crystal structure upon cooling (see Figure S2 in the Supporting Information), ruling out transition to tetragonal or orthorhombic phases as a factor influencing optical properties at low temperatures. The following results are representative of several samples from different synthesis batches, and are obtained from the measurements of tens of individual NCs.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Illustration of the crystal structure. (b) High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) image of a single nanocrystal. (c) PL microscopy image from a low-density nanocrystal film obtained with (nonhomogeneous) wide-field excitation. The scale bar corresponds to 2 μm. (d) Absorption (orange) and PL (black) spectra from a high-density ensemble at room temperature, and the corresponding PL (dark green) at T = 6 K. Representative spectra of three individual quantum dots in the low-density film (blue, green, red) at T = 6 K are superimposed.

Results

In general, single quantum emitters are susceptible to their environment, and their emission can be altered by external electromagnetic fields. Within solid state systems, nearby trapped charges or polarization of the surrounding material lead to spectral diffusion of the emission energy. At low optical excitation power Pex = 1.8 μW, we observe spectral diffusion with a standard deviation of 0.13 meV, much below the PL fwhm of 1 meV (Figure 2a). Statistics on the intensity of the emitted light with binning times of 10 ms show a nearly Poissonian intensity noise distribution (Figure 2b), reflecting a small non-Poissonian intensity flickering component and the absence of blinking events associated with dark states (see Figure S3 in the Supporting Information). While the magnitude of the spectral diffusion and also the presence of intensity flickering differ from NC to NC, single perovskite NC in general show good photostability even without electronic passivation with a wider-gap shell material2224 (see Figure S3 and Movie S1 in the Supporting Information).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) PL spectral time series shows spectral diffusion. The inset is a histogram of the peak energies, which is described well by a Gaussian distribution (black line). (b) PL intensity as a function of time shows blinking-free emission. The histogram in the lower plot follows a Poissonian intensity distribution (black line).

The hallmark feature of quantum light sources is photon antibunching, i.e., that only single photons are emitted because the normalized second-order correlation function g(2)(τ) drops to zero at τ = 0. We measure the photon correlations in a Hanbury–Brown–Twiss setup with pulsed excitation. In the experiment, we find g(2)(0) < 0.5 (Figure 3a) which unequivocally proves that the NCs are indeed zero-dimensional quantum dots (QDs) serving as deterministic single photon sources on demand. This also shows that we are investigating really single QDs since a cluster of n QDs would yield25g(2)(0) ≥ 1–1/n. The magnitude of the antibunching depends on multiexciton generation within a single QD in addition to the background signal (autofluorescence of the substrate/matrix and components of the optical setup). We included more g(2)(τ) traces in the Supporting Information (Figure S5) in order to rule-out other potential systematic effects. The difference between our values around ∼0.3 at a temperature of 6 K and the 0.06 observed at room temperature in ref (21) could be due to a change of the efficiency to create or quench multiexciton states,26e.g., via Auger recombination (see measurements for higher excitations power below). We observe that this value even raises at high excitation power (see Figure S6 in the Supporting Information), probably due to the presence of additional states being involved in the emission process.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) The photon correlation obtained in a Hanbury–Brown–Twiss configuration shows peaks every 12.5 ns when the laser pulses excite the QD. Each peak is described by a single-exponential decay on both sides, representing the PL decay times. Single photon emission is manifested by the correlation peak at τ = 0 being suppressed to g(2) = 0.3 below the antibunching threshold at g(2) = 0.5. The plot shows raw data without background subtraction or deconvolution. (b) Time-resolved photon emission as a function of time after the excitation pulse (without background subtraction). The linear slope in the logarithmic plot for two different excitation powers (0.8 μW, black and 7.5 μW, green) shows a power-independent single exponential decay over about 2 decades with a decay time of 250 ps (least-squares fits are red and blue, respectively).

We measured the PL lifetime as a function of Pex (Figure 3b) and observe a single exponential decay over about 2 orders of magnitude which is characteristic of an effectively single excitonic transition. The 1/e decay times slightly vary between different QDs within in the range of 180–250 ps, which is significantly faster than for single molecules,11,27 epitaxially grown III–V13,28 or colloidal II–VI14 semiconductor QDs or nitrogen vacancy color centers in diamond.29 It is also 1–2 orders of magnitude faster than at room temperature19,21 which could originate from an increased coherence volume of the exciton, as it is observed in many other systems such as semiconductor quantum wells30 or CuCl nanocrystals.31 Although a size-dependent study with NCs significantly smaller than the Bohr radius could help to pin down the origin for the fast decay, this is currently not feasible for single dot spectroscopy due to the tendency to crystal phase transitions and decomposition/aggregation upon isolation and purification with smaller NCs. The decay in the weak excitation regime below 10 μW is almost independent of the excitation power, proving the absence of various quenching mechanisms such as Auger recombination or bimolecular annihilation of excitons. Subtracting the background from the substrate and the matrix (see Supporting Information Figure S4), we conclude that only a negligible fraction of luminescence (∼10% of all detected photons) comes from very long-lived states (>10 ns). Because the room temperature quantum yield can reach 90%, and the Auger-like power-dependent quenching is not observed, we attribute the short decay time to radiative recombination that reflects the high oscillator strength of the material.

Ideally, for a single quantum emitter the observed PL line width should be as narrow as the Fourier limit imposed by the emitter’s decay time. Even for the lowest Pex the QD PL line widths appears to be more than an order of magnitude away from this limit. However, using high-resolution spectroscopy, we observe that the peak is asymmetric with a fwhm that varies from QD to QD between 0.6 and 2 meV, and for a fraction of the QDs a manifold of transitions is resolvable while photon antibunching is still observed. An exemplary case is shown in Figure 4a, where three peaks with individual fwhm down to 0.6 meV are resolvable with an energy spacing of 0.75 meV between them and amplitudes that decay toward higher energy. Polarization-resolved PL measurements reveal that they have different degrees and axes of polarization (Figure 4b). The peak widths, the splittings (if resolvable), and the relative polarization orientations vary from QD to QD, suggesting that this fine structure is linked to anisotropies or defect complexes in the individual nanocrystals.32

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) At low excitation power Pex and high spectral resolution with integration times of 10 s and a rotatable polarizer in the detection path, the PL spectrum reveals a complex fine structure. Three peaks (labeled 1, 2, 3) can be resolved. (b) The polarization of each of the three peaks is measured by rotating the linear polarizer. The polar plot shows the intensities at the respective peak emission energy as a function of polarizer angle.

Isolated single nanocrystals allow the investigation of photogeneration, recombination and trapping of charges to a degree that remains inaccessible within an ensemble of emitters where the inhomogeneous broadening washes out many features. While our experiments at low excitation power show a narrow single emission line with only little spectral diffusion and intermittency, this changes when the excitation power is increased (Figure 5a). At first, the excitonic emission peak still increases linearly with Pex, showing no density-induced quenching. Beyond a certain Pex, a second peak red-shifted by 16 meV arises which intensity increases nonlinearly with Pexα with an exponent of α = 1.5 (inset Figure 5c). It also shows hysteretic behavior, i.e., that it can stay present sometimes for tens of seconds when the excitation power is lowered again. We attribute this additional emission peak to charged excitons, as the above behavior is a strong indication of photogenerated charges which can subsequently remain trapped in the QD. The amount of red-shift (10–20 meV) and the exponent (1.3–1.7) vary between different QDs in the given ranges, suggesting that properties of the individual nanocrystals or surfaces like size, compositional variation (Br/Cl ratio) and defects play a role.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) Comparing low and high Pex (11 μW, black, and 92 μW, red) an emission peak from charged excitons appears at lower energy. (b) PL as a function of Pex shows the gradual emergence of the charged exciton peak together with a strong increase in spectral diffusion and intermittency. (c) Spectrally integrated emission intensity as a function of excitation power shows linear behavior (power-law fit gives an exponent of 0.97 ± 0.02) also in the high excitation regime. The inset shows power-law fits to the spectral ranges of the uncharged (black) and the charged exciton peaks (red), which yield exponents of 1 ± 0.1 (up to intermediate excitation power) and 1.5 ± 0.1, respectively. (d) Time-resolved PL measurement shows a nonexponential decay shortening for high excitation power (red, 51 μW) as compared to the weak excitation regime (green, 7.5 μW). Both traces are raw data that is not corrected for the background.

Furthermore, the spectral diffusion and intermittency of the uncharged and the charged exciton emission strongly increases with increasing Pex (Figure 5b and Figure S7b in the Supporting Information). At intermediate Pex for some QDs the charged exciton line can become 2–3 times narrower than the exciton line, suggesting that the transition might have reduced electron–phonon coupling or vanishing fine structure splittings. At higher Pex, the charged exciton feature can split into multiple peaks that is most likely caused by multiple charges being generated (see Figure S7a in the Supporting Information). Most striking is the observation that the quantum yield (i.e., integrated PL intensity) of the majority of the QDs does not drop significantly in the high excitation regime (Figure 5c), while the decay at the same time is further accelerated and becomes nonexponential (Figure 5d). This suggests that, in contrast to room temperature,21 the faster decay is still mainly radiative and rather caused by the enhanced decay rates of charged or multiexcitons and not nonradiative Auger quenching.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our experiments demonstrate that colloidal NCs of metal–halide perovskites can serve as stable quantum emitters with some outstanding optical properties and versatile processability, allowing easy integration and offering a clear pathway for electrical driving.33 It is expected that the ultrafast radiative decay and single photon operation can enable strong-coupling cavity quantum electrodynamics experiments in high quality factor microcavities.34 In addition, high-resolution investigations on single NCs pave the way to a much deeper understanding of the photophysics of these exceptional materials, which can shed light on open questions such as the anomalous hysteresis.35 Furthermore, it can guide material development for optimized charge production and transport or core–shell/matrix heterostructures33 that are essential for a further leap in the efficiencies of solar cells1 and light sources.6

Methods

Synthesis and Sample Preparation

CsPb(Cl/Br)3 NCs were synthesized by reacting Cs-oleate with a mixture of PbCl2 and PbBr2 in 1-octadecene at 200 °C, as described previously19 (for details, see the Supporting Information). Isolation and purification procedures were optimized to yield nearly monodisperse (10%) and aggregate-free colloids. The colloidal NCs were diluted to nanomolar concentrations within a solution of polystyrene in toluene. A thin film of 100 nm was then spin-cast on a high-purity, 3 μm thick SiO2 layer which was obtained by thermally oxidizing a crystalline Si wafer.

Characterization

All measurements were performed in a home-built micro-PL setup with the sample mounted inside a liquid helium flow cryostat (Cryovac) in vacuum. For all photoluminescence measurements, a single-mode fiber-coupled continuous wave excitation laser at a wavelength of λ = 405 nm (Thorlabs) with linear polarization and short-pass filter (Semrock FF01-440/SP) was used. Excitation and detection was done through a long-working distance 100× microscope objective with numerical aperture of NA = 0.7 (Mitutoyo Plan Apo NIR HR) which was mounted outside the cryostat. This resulted in a nearly Gaussian excitation spot with 1/e2-radius of 1.4 μm. The emission from the sample was long-pass filtered (Semrock BLP01-442R), dispersed by an 1800 lines/mm grating in a 0.75 m monochromator (Acton Spectra Pro) and detected by a back-illuminated cooled EMCCD camera (Princeton Instruments ProEM). For excitation in the photon correlation and PL lifetime measurements, a frequency-doubled Ti:sapphire laser at λ = 400 nm with 100 fs pulse duration and 80 MHz repetition rate (Spectra-Physics Tsunami with Millennia pump laser) was coupled through a single-mode fiber to the setup. The detection was done after a tunable 80 meV-wide bandpass filter (Semrock TBP01-501/15) with a time-correlated single photon counting system (PicoQuant PicoHarp 300 with PDM, MPD avalanche photo diodes with nominal time resolution of 30 ps).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to B. J. Offrein and P. F. Seidler for insightful discussions, U. Drechsler and A. La Porta for help with the sample preparation and M. Wörle for help with temperature-dependent XRD measurements. This work was partly supported by the European Union’s Horizon-2020 and FP7 framework programmes through the Marie-Sklodowska Curie ITN network PHONSI (H2020-MSCA-ITN-642656) and ERC Starting Grant (NANOSOLID, GA No. 306733).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b07328.

  • additional details and data on synthesis and characterization of CsPb(Cl/Br)3 NCs, intensity flickering statistics, background subtraction for time-resolved PL measurements, additional photon antibunching data and optical characterization at higher excitation power (PDF)

  • Movie S1 (AVI)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

nn5b07328_si_001.pdf (4.5MB, pdf)
nn5b07328_si_002.avi (2.3MB, avi)

References

  1. Grätzel M. The Light and Shade of Perovskite Solar Cells. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 838–842. 10.1038/nmat4065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Stranks S. D.; Snaith H. J. Metal-Halide Perovskites for Photovoltaic and Light-Emitting Devices. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 391–402. 10.1038/nnano.2015.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lee M. M.; Teuscher J.; Miyasaka T.; Murakami T. N.; Snaith H. J. Efficient Hybrid Solar Cells Based on Meso-Superstructured Organometal Halide Perovskites. Science 2012, 338, 643–647. 10.1126/science.1228604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Nie W.; Tsai H.; Asadpour R.; Blancon J.-C.; Neukirch A. J.; Gupta G.; Crochet J. J.; Chhowalla M.; Tretiak S.; Alam M. A.; Wang H.-L.; Mohite A. D. High-Efficiency Solution-Processed Perovskite Solar Cells with Millimeter-Scale Grains. Science 2015, 347, 522–525. 10.1126/science.aaa0472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jeon N. J.; Noh J. H.; Yang W. S.; Kim Y. C.; Ryu S.; Seo J.; Seok S. I. Compositional Engineering of Perovskite Materials for High-Performance Solar Cells. Nature 2015, 517, 476–480. 10.1038/nature14133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tan Z.-K.; Moghaddam R. S.; Lai M. L.; Docampo P.; Higler R.; Deschler F.; Price M.; Sadhanala A.; Pazos L. M.; Credgington D.; Hanusch F.; Bein T.; Snaith H. J.; Friend R. H. Bright Light-Emitting Diodes Based on Organometal Halide Perovskite. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 687–692. 10.1038/nnano.2014.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Xing G.; Mathews N.; Lim S. S.; Yantara N.; Liu X.; Sabba D.; Grätzel M.; Mhaisalkar S.; Sum T. C. Low-Temperature Solution-Processed Wavelength-Tunable Perovskites for Lasing. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 476–480. 10.1038/nmat3911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang Q.; Ha S. T.; Liu X.; Sum T. C.; Xiong Q. Room-Temperature Near-Infrared High-Q Perovskite Whispering-Gallery Planar Nanolasers. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 5995–6001. 10.1021/nl503057g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Deschler F.; Price M.; Pathak S.; Klintberg L. E.; Jarausch D.-D.; Higler R.; Hüttner S.; Leijtens T.; Stranks S. D.; Snaith H. J.; Atatüre M.; Phillips R. T.; Friend R. H. High Photoluminescence Efficiency and Optically Pumped Lasing in Solution-Processed Mixed Halide Perovskite Semiconductors. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 1421–1426. 10.1021/jz5005285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wen X.; Ho-Baillie A.; Huang S.; Sheng R.; Chen S.; Ko H.-C.; Green M. A. Mobile Charge-Induced Fluorescence Intermittency in Methylammonium Lead Bromide Perovskite. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 4644–4649. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Basché T.; Moerner W. E.; Orrit M.; Talon H. Photon Antibunching in the Fluorescence of a Single Dye Molecule Trapped in a Solid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 69, 1516–1519. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Empedocles S. A.; Norris D. J.; Bawendi M. G. Photoluminescence Spectroscopy of Single CdSe Nanocrystallite Quantum Dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3873–3876. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Michler P.; Kiraz A.; Becher C.; Schoenfeld W. V.; Petroff P. M.; Zhang L.; Hu E.; Imamoglu A. A Quantum Dot Single-Photon Turnstile Device. Science 2000, 290, 2282–2285. 10.1126/science.290.5500.2282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Michler P.; Imamoglu A.; Mason M. D.; Carson P. J.; Strouse G. F.; Buratto S. K. Quantum Correlation Among Photons from a Single Quantum Dot at Room Temperature. Nature 2000, 406, 968–970. 10.1038/35023100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kurtsiefer C.; Mayer S.; Zarda P.; Weinfurter H. Stable Solid-State Source of Single Photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 290–293. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brouri R.; Beveratos A.; Poizat J.-P.; Grangier P. Photon Antibunching in the Fluorescence of Individual Color Centers in Diamond. Opt. Lett. 2000, 25, 1294–1296. 10.1364/OL.25.001294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Betzig E.; Patterson G. H.; Sougrat R.; Lindwasser O. W.; Olenych S.; Bonifacino J. S.; Davidson M. W.; Lippincott-Schwartz J.; Hess H. F. Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution. Science 2006, 313, 1642–1645. 10.1126/science.1127344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Eisaman M. D.; Fan J.; Migdall A.; Polyakov S. V. Single-Photon Sources and Detectors. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2011, 82, 071101. 10.1063/1.3610677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Protesescu L.; Yakunin S.; Bodnarchuk M. I.; Krieg F.; Caputo R.; Hendon C. H.; Yang R. X.; Walsh A.; Kovalenko M. V. Nanocrystals of Cesium Lead Halide Perovskites (CsPbX3, X = Cl, Br, and I): Novel Optoelectronic Materials Showing Bright Emission with Wide Color Gamut. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 3692–3696. 10.1021/nl5048779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Oga H.; Saeki A.; Ogomi Y.; Hayase S.; Seki S. Improved Understanding of the Electronic and Energetic Landscapes of Perovskite Solar Cells: High Local Charge Carrier Mobility, Reduced Recombination, and Extremely Shallow Traps. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 13818–13825. 10.1021/ja506936f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Park Y.-S.; Guo S.; Makarov N. S.; Klimov V. I. Room Temperature Single-Photon Emission from Individual Perovskite Quantum Dots. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 10386–10393. 10.1021/acsnano.5b04584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Frantsuzov P.; Kuno M.; Jankó B.; Marcus R. A. Universal Emission Intermittency in Quantum Dots, Nanorods and Nanowires. Nat. Phys. 2008, 4, 519–522. 10.1038/nphys1001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mahler B.; Spinicelli P.; Buil S.; Quelin X.; Hermier J.-P.; Dubertret B. Towards non-blinking colloidal quantum dots. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 659–664. 10.1038/nmat2222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Galland C.; Ghosh Y.; Steinbrück A.; Sykora M.; Hollingsworth J. A.; Klimov V. I.; Htoon H. Two Types of Luminescence Blinking Revealed by Spectroelectrochemistry of Single Quantum Dots. Nature 2011, 479, 203–208. 10.1038/nature10569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Brouri R.; Beveratos A.; Poizat J.-P.; Grangier P. Photon Antibunching in the Fluorescence of Individual Color Centers in Diamond. Opt. Lett. 2000, 25, 1294–1296. 10.1364/OL.25.001294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nair G.; Zhao J.; Bawendi M. G. Biexciton Quantum Yield of Single Semiconductor Nanocrystals from Photon Statistics. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1136–1140. 10.1021/nl104054t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lounis B.; Moerner W. E. Single Photons on Demand from a Single Molecule at Room Temperature. Nature 2000, 407, 491–493. 10.1038/35035032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shields A. Semiconductor Quantum Light Sources. Nat. Photonics 2007, 1, 215–223. 10.1038/nphoton.2007.46. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Doherty M. W.; Manson N. B.; Delaney P.; Jelezko F.; Wrachtrup J.; Hollenberg L. C. L. The Nitrogen-Vacancy Colour Centre in Diamond. Phys. Rep. 2013, 528, 1. 10.1016/j.physrep.2013.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Feldmann J.; Peter G.; Göbel E. O.; Dawson P.; Moore K.; Foxon C.; Elliott R. J. Linewidth Dependence of Radiative Exciton Lifetimes in Quantum Wells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987, 59, 2337–2340. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Itoh T.; Furumiya M.; Ikehara T.; Gourdon C. Size-Dependent Radiative Decay Time of Confined Excitons in CuCl Microcrystals. Solid State Commun. 1990, 73, 271–274. 10.1016/0038-1098(90)90734-S. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Buin A.; Comin R.; Xu J.; Ip A. H.; Sargent E. H. Halide-Dependent Electronic Structure of Organolead Perovskite Materials. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 4405–4412. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01909. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ning Z.; Gong X.; Comin R.; Walters G.; Fan F.; Voznyy O.; Yassitepe E.; Buin A.; Hoogland S.; Sargent E. H. Quantum-Dot-in-Perovskite Solids. Nature 2015, 523, 324–328. 10.1038/nature14563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kimble H. J. The Quantum Internet. Nature 2008, 453, 1023–1030. 10.1038/nature07127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Snaith H. L.; Abate A.; Ball J. M.; Eperon G. E.; Leijtens T.; Noel N. K.; Stranks S. D.; Wang J. T.-W.; Wojciechowski K.; Zhang W. Anomalous Hysteresis in Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 1511–1515. 10.1021/jz500113x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

nn5b07328_si_001.pdf (4.5MB, pdf)
nn5b07328_si_002.avi (2.3MB, avi)

Articles from ACS Nano are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES