Skip to main content
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2016 Feb 29;7:214. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00214

Reducing Cytoplasmic Polyamine Oxidase Activity in Arabidopsis Increases Salt and Drought Tolerance by Reducing Reactive Oxygen Species Production and Increasing Defense Gene Expression

G H M Sagor 1, Siyuan Zhang 1, Seiji Kojima 1,2, Stefan Simm 3, Thomas Berberich 4, Tomonobu Kusano 1,*
PMCID: PMC4770033  PMID: 26973665

Abstract

The link between polyamine oxidases (PAOs), which function in polyamine catabolism, and stress responses remains elusive. Here, we address this issue using Arabidopsis pao mutants in which the expression of the five PAO genes is knocked-out or knocked-down. As the five single pao mutants and wild type (WT) showed similar response to salt stress, we tried to generate the mutants that have either the cytoplasmic PAO pathway (pao1 pao5) or the peroxisomal PAO pathway (pao2 pao3 pao4) silenced. However, the latter triple mutant was not obtained. Thus, in this study, we used two double mutants, pao1 pao5 and pao2 pao4. Of interest, pao1 pao5 mutant was NaCl- and drought-tolerant, whereas pao2 pao4 showed similar sensitivity to those stresses as WT. To reveal the underlying mechanism of salt tolerance, further analyses were performed. Na uptake of the mutant (pao1 pao5) decreased to 75% of WT. PAO activity of the mutant was reduced to 62% of WT. The content of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as hydrogen peroxide, a reaction product of PAO action, and superoxide anion in the mutant became 81 and 72% of the levels in WT upon salt treatment. The mutant contained 2.8-fold higher thermospermine compared to WT. Moreover, the mutant induced the genes of salt overly sensitive-, abscisic acid (ABA)-dependent- and ABA-independent- pathways more strongly than WT upon salt treatment. The results suggest that the Arabidopsis plant silencing cytoplasmic PAOs shows salinity tolerance by reducing ROS production and strongly inducing subsets of stress-responsive genes under stress conditions.

Keywords: Arabidopsis thaliana, drought stress, loss-of-function mutant, polyamine oxidase, reactive oxygen species, salinity stress

Introduction

Polyamines (PAs) are aliphatic compounds with low molecular masses that are ubiquitously present in all living organisms. Bacteria primarily contain the PAs putrescine (Put) and spermidine (Spd), whereas some bacteria and mammalian cells also contain spermine (Spm; Tabor and Tabor, 1985; Cohen, 1998). In addition to these PAs, plants also contain another tetraamine, thermospermine (T-Spm), an isomer of Spm (Knott et al., 2007; Kakehi et al., 2008; Naka et al., 2010; Takano et al., 2012). PAs play important roles in numerous physiological processes. In plants, PAs are involved in embryogenesis, cell division, organogenesis, flowering and senescence, as well as responses to abiotic and biotic stresses (Groppa and Benavides, 2008; Kusano et al., 2008; Alcázar et al., 2010; Mattoo et al., 2010; Minocha et al., 2014; Berberich et al., 2015; Mo et al., 2015)

Polyamine homeostasis is governed by a dynamic balance between PA biosynthesis and catabolism. The plant PA biosynthetic pathway has been well documented (Bagni and Tassoni, 2001; Kusano et al., 2008; Fuell et al., 2010). Put biosynthesis starts with either the conversion of ornithine by ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) or arginine by arginine decarboxylase. Put is then converted to Spd by Spd synthase. This reaction requires another substrate, decarboxylated S-adenosylmethionine, which is synthesized from methionine via two sequential reactions catalyzed by methionine adenosyltransferase and S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase, respectively. Spd is further converted to either Spm or T-Spm, which is catalyzed by Spm synthase or T-Spm synthase, respectively. It should be noted that Arabidopsis thaliana lacks a gene encoding ODC (Hanfrey et al., 2001). Accumulating evidence indicates that transgenic plants with increased PA levels (via overexpression of PA biosynthetic genes) have increased abiotic stress tolerance, whereas mutant plants deficient in PA biosynthesis are hypersensitive to abiotic stresses (Urano et al., 2003; Capell et al., 2004; Yamaguchi et al., 2006, 2007; Berberich et al., 2015 and the references therein).

Two additional enzymes, copper-containing amine oxidase (CuAO) and polyamine oxidase (PAO), are also involved in PA catabolism (Bagni and Tassoni, 2001; Cona et al., 2006; Angelini et al., 2008; Moschou et al., 2012; Kusano et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2015; Wang and Liu, 2015). It was previously thought that CuAO only catalyzed the oxidation of diamines. For example, Put is oxidized to 4-aminobutanal with concurrent production of NH3 and H2O2. However, it was recently revealed that some CuAOs also oxidize the triamine Spd (Planas-Portell et al., 2013). PAO is a flavin-adenine dinucleotide (FAD)-associated enzyme. Until 2006, it was believed that plant PAO catalyzed the conversion of Spd- and Spm-oxidation to 4-aminobutanal and N-(3-aminopropyl)-4-aminobutanal, respectively, along with the production of 1,3-diaminopropane and H2O2 (Federico et al., 1990; Cona et al., 2006). The mode of this reaction is known as terminal catabolism. In addition to this process, plant PAO is also involved in a PA back-conversion pathway (Tavladoraki et al., 2006; Kamada-Nobusada et al., 2008; Moschou et al., 2008c; Takahashi et al., 2010; Fincato et al., 2011, 2012). This type of PAO reaction converts Spm and T-Spm to Spd, and/or further to Put, along with the production of 3-aminopropanal and H2O2. A. thaliana contains five PAO genes, termed AtPAO1 to AtPAO5. These genes and their products have been extensively studied. AtPAO1 and AtPAO5 are located in the cytoplasm, whereas AtPAO2, AtPAO3, and AtPAO4 reside in peroxisomes (Tavladoraki et al., 2006; Kamada-Nobusada et al., 2008; Moschou et al., 2008c; Takahashi et al., 2010; Fincato et al., 2011, 2012; Ahou et al., 2014; Kim et al., 2014). Although the five AtPAOs differ in their spatio-temporal expression patterns and PA substrate specificity, all of these PAOs are involved in PA back-conversion, namely, AtPAO1 and AtPAO5 prefer T-spm and back-convert it to Spd, AtPAO4 is involved in Spm back-conversion to Spd, not to Put, and AtPAO2 and AtPAO3 mainly convert Spd to Put. While a link between PA catabolism and abiotic and biotic stress responses has been described (Berberich et al., 2015; Roach et al., 2015, and references therein), most of these results were obtained using CuAO- or PAO-specific inhibitors.

The aim of this study was to uncover distinct role(s) of Arabidopsis PAOs in abiotic stress responses. We examined the growth responses of knock-out or knock-down mutants of AtPAOs under high salt and drought stress conditions. We found that the pao1 pao5 double mutant, but not the five single mutants or the pao2 pao4 double mutant, was tolerant to salt and drought stress. We investigated the reason behind the salt tolerance of pao1 pao5, finding that several genes in ABA-dependent and -independent pathways were highly expressed in this mutant. We also measured the PAO activity and the amounts of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide anion (O2-) in the pao1 pao5 mutant. The results of this study help elucidate a possible mechanism underlying the salt and drought tolerance of pao1 pao5.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Arabidopsis thaliana accession Col-0 [wild type (WT)] and T-DNA insertion lines Atpao1-2 (SAIL_822_A11), Atpao2-4 (SALK_046281), Atpao3-1 (GK209F07), Atpao4-1 (SALK_133599), and Atpao5-2 (SALK_053110), which were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (Ohio State University, USA), were used in this study. The T-DNA insertion lines were designated pao1, pao2, pao3, pao4, and pao5, respectively. All seeds were surface sterilized with 70% ethanol for 1 min and 1% sodium hypochloride plus 0.1% Tween-20 for 15 min, followed by extensive washing with sterile distilled water. Sterilized seeds were placed into pots containing a soil mix consisting of Vermiculite:SupermixA (1:1 v/v) or on half-strength MS (designated 1/2 MS in this study) 1.5% agar plates (pH 5.6) containing 1% sucrose and B5 vitamin (MP Biomedicals, Cat # 2625149). The plants were grown at 22°C under a 14 h light/10 h dark photocycle.

Chemicals

Put, Spd, and Spm were purchased from Tokyo Kasei Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). T-Spm was chemically synthesized (Niitsu and Samejima, 1986). All other chemicals, which were analytical grade, were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich Corp. (St. Louis, MO, USA), Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan), and Nacalai Tesque, Ltd. (Kyoto, Japan).

Reverse Transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) Analyses

Total RNA was prepared from 2-week-old Arabidopsis seedlings using Sepasol-RNA I Super (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). First-strand cDNA was synthesized with ReverTra Ace (Toyobo Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan) and oligo-dT primers. The qRT-PCR analysis was performed with Fast-Start Universal SYBR Green Master (ROX; Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) on a StepOne real-time PCR system (Life Technologies Japan, Tokyo, Japan). The two-step RT-PCR was performed with the following program: one cycle of 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, and 60°C for 60 s. Melting curves were generated after the 40 cycles by heating the samples to 95°C for 15 s, followed by cooling to 60°C for 1 min and heating to 95°C for 15 s. The amount of cDNA was calculated with the comparative ΔΔCT method (Schmittgen and Livak, 2008) with StepOne v2.1 (Applied Biosystems) using the housekeeping gene CBP20, encoding cap-binding protein 20 (Supplementary Table S2) as a reference gene.

Growth Response to High Salt and Drought Treatment

High salt treatment: Sterilized Arabidopsis seeds were grown on 1/2 MS agar plates containing different concentrations of NaCl (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 mM). The plates were placed at a vertical position with an 85° angle and incubated in a growth chamber at 22°C for 14 days. Drought treatment: Arabidopsis seeds were sown in pots containing soil mix (Vermiculite: Supermix A, 1:1 v/v) in a plant incubator at 22°C under a 14 h light/10 h dark photocycle. Each pot contained 28 g of soil mix. The plants were supplied with 50 ml of water once a week for 1 month. The plants were then divided into two groups: the first group was grown as before, and the second group was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 2 weeks.

Generation of the AtPAO Double Mutants

The pao1 pao5 and pao2 pao4 double mutant plants were generated by crossing pao1 with pao5, and pao2 with pao4, respectively.

Water Loss Assay

Water loss assay was performed by the procedure described by Weigel and Glazebrook (2002). In brief, 2-week-old Arabidopsis seedlings were removed from the 1/2 MS agar plates, and 25 seedlings per plate were placed onto dry filter paper. Their fresh weights were monitored every 10 min for 60 min after the onset of drought treatment. The fresh weights at the onset of the treatment were set at 100%, and the relative water loss was determined.

Measuring Na and K Levels

Two-week-old seedlings grown on 1/2 MS agar medium were carefully removed from the plates, transferred to wet filter paper containing 1/2 MS liquid medium with or without 100 mM NaCl, and further incubated for 12 and 24 h, respectively. The plant samples were collected, rinsed three times with deionized water, and dried at 65°C for 2 days. Dried plant samples were digested with 100% nitric acid at 130°C for 90 min and filtered, and the ion concentrations in the samples were analyzed by ICP spectrophotometry (iCAP 6000 series, ThermoFisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

PAO Activity Assay

Polyamine oxidases activity was assayed as described by Liu and Liu (2004). Briefly, the enzyme extracts were prepared as follows: 2-week-old seedlings (approximately 0.2 g) were homogenized in 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) containing 20 mM sodium ascorbate, 1 mM pyridoxal-5′-phosphate, 10 mM DTT, 0.1 mM Na2EDTA, and 0.1 mM PMSF (phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). The homogenate was centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 60 min at 4°C. The supernatant was used as the crude enzyme extract. The reaction mixture (total volume of 3.0 mL) contained 0.1 mL of crude enzyme extract, 2.5 mL of 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5), 0.2 ml of 4-aminoantipyrine/N,N′-dimethylaniline, and 0.1 mL of horseradish peroxidase (POX; 250 U/mL). The reaction was initiated by adding 200 mM spermidine. A 0.01 change in absorbance at 555 nm was regarded as one enzyme activity unit.

ROS Analyses

H2O2 levels were determined as described by Messner and Boll (1994). Seedlings (approximately 200 mg fresh weight) were homogenized in a pre-chilled mortar and pestle with 0.3 mL of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 10% (w/v) Polyclar. Each aliquot (200 μL) of extract was combined with 10 μL of horseradish POX [1 mg of enzyme (169-10791, Wako Chemical Co. Ltd.) dissolved in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer, 100 units/mg] and 10 μL of 50 mM (w/v) ABTS [2,20-azino-bis(3-ethylobenzo-thiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt] solution. After 3 min of incubation, absorbance at 415 nm was measured using a spectrophotometer and compared with the values obtained from standard solutions containing specific amounts of H2O2 in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0).

O2- levels were determined based on its ability to reduce nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) as described (Doke, 1983). In brief, seedlings were cut into pieces and immersed in 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) containing 0.05% (w/v) NBT and 10 mM NaN3, and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After incubation, 2 mL of the reaction solution was heated at 85°C for 15 min and cooled rapidly. The optical density at 580 nm was recorded, and the O2- content was expressed as the increase in absorbance/g dry weight.

In situ accumulation of O2- and H2O2 was detected by histochemical staining with NBT and diaminobenzidine (DAB), respectively, according to the procedure described by Romero-Puertas et al. (2004) with minor modifications. In brief, 2-week-old Arabidopsis seedlings grown on 1/2 MS agar medium were carefully removed from the medium, transferred to wet filter paper containing 1/2 MS medium solution either with or without 100 mM NaCl, and further incubated for 12 h. For O2- detection, the seedlings were immersed in 2% NBT solution dissolved in 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) at room temperature. The immersed leaves were illuminated for 2 h until dark spots appeared, which are characteristic of blue formazan precipitates. To detect H2O2, another set of samples was immersed in DAB solution (1 mg mL-1) that was freshly prepared in 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) and incubated at room temperature for 8 h under continuous light until brown spots, which are derived from the reaction of DAB with H2O2, were observed. For both staining methods, the seedlings were bleached in 100% ethanol, followed by 70% ethanol, and observed under a microscope (LG-PS2, Olympus).

Ion Leakage Assay

Conductivity was measured with a MultiLine Multi 3410 IDS instrument equipped with a TetraCon 925 conductivity cell (WTW Wissenschaftlich-Technische Werkstätten GmbH, Weilheim, Germany). Five seedlings each with or without 100 mM NaCl treatment were rinsed five times with distilled water. The rosette leaves removed from seedlings were incubated in a 15 mL tube with 5 mL of distilled water for 24 h at 22°C before measuring (Cond1). Total conductivity (Cond2) was obtained after heating the tubes in boiling water for 20 min. Electrolyte leakage was expressed as percentage of total conductivity. Leakage was calculated as: Cond1/Cond2 × 100.

Enzyme Activity Assay

The activities of catalase (CAT; EC 1.11.1.6), POX (EC 1.11.1.7), superoxide dismutase (SOD; EC 1.15.1.1) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX; EC 1.10.3.3) were tested in 100 mM NaCl treated and untreated WT and pao1 pao5 mutant plants. Five seedlings each were blotted dry, weighed and homogenized on ice in the respective extraction buffer (4 μL/mg fresh weight) in a 1.5 mL tube with a little sea sand and a pestle. Fifty mM K-phosphate-buffer, pH 7.5, was used as extraction buffer for CAT and SOD. For APX assays 50 mM K-phosphate-buffer, pH 7.0, containing 1 mM Na-ascorbate was used for extraction. For POX assays the assay buffer of the assay Kit (Sigma–Aldrich) was used. After centrifugation at 15,000 × g, for 10 min at 4°C, the supernatants were transferred to fresh tubes and kept on ice until use. All enzyme activities were measured spectrophotometrically (Hitachi U-2000). The results are presented as relative activities compared to untreated WT seedlings. CAT activity was estimated by the breakdown of H2O2 (Beers and Sizer, 1952). Briefly, 10 μL of extract was used in a total volume of 1 mL extraction buffer containing 10 mM H2O2 and the decrease of H2O2 was monitored by change in the absorbance at 240 nm. The activity per mg tissue was calculated according to Beers and Sizer (1952). POX activity was measured using a commercial kit (POX Activity Assay Kit, Sigma–Aldrich). Four μL of extract was used for the colorimetric assay (570 nm) in a total volume of 100 μL as described in the manual using a microcuvette at 25°C. A standard curve was used to calculate enzyme activity per mg tissue. SOD was assayed according to McCord and Fridovich (1969) through inhibition of the reduction of oxidized cytochrome c by SOD in a coupled system, using xanthine and xanthine oxidase. Between 5 and 10 μL of extract were used and the absorbance at 550 nm was monitored. The percentage of inhibition was calculated and used to express the activity in units/g FW. APX activity was tested with 10 μL of extract in a total volume of 1 mL reaction mixture by monitoring the oxidation rate of ascorbate at 290 nm according to Nakano and Asada (1987).

PA Analysis by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

PA extraction, derivatization, and analysis by HPLC were performed as described by Naka et al. (2010) and Sagor et al. (2015). In brief, plant samples (0.3–0.5 g per sample) were pulverized with a mortar and pestle under liquid nitrogen. Five volumes (2.5 mL per 0.5 g of plant sample) of 5% (v/v) cold perchloric acid were added to the resulting fine powders. The mixtures were transferred to plastic tubes and kept on ice for 1 h. After centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C, the supernatants were combined and filtered using a filter syringe (pore size, 0.2 μm). One milliliter of 2 N NaOH was added to 1.5 mL of plant extract, the mixture was vortexed, 10 μL of benzoyl chloride was added, and mixed again followed by incubation at room temperature for 20 min, and then 2 mL of saturated NaCl was added. After the addition of 2 mL of diethyl ether, samples were vigorously mixed and then centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C for phase-separation. An aliquot (1.5 mL) of the organic solvent phase was evaporated and the residue was resuspended in 50 μL of methanol.

Benzoylated PAs were analyzed with a programmable Agilent 1200 liquid chromatograph using a reverse-phase column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, TSK-GEL ODS-80Ts, TOSOH, Tokyo, Japan) and detected at 254 nm as described (Sagor et al., 2015).

Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed with at least three biological samples unless mentioned. Data analysis was performed using the statistical tools (Student’s t-test) of Microsoft Excel software.

Results

Five Arabidopsis Single pao Mutants Exhibit WT-Like Responses to High Salt Stress

First, we confirmed the transcript levels of the five PAO genes in WT and the pao mutants by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) using the primers listed in Supplementary Table S1. The pao1 and pao5 mutants appeared to be knock-out mutants, whereas pao2, pao3, and pao4 were likely knock-down mutants (Kim et al., 2014). We tested the NaCl sensitivity of these pao mutants by plating sterilized seeds on MS agar medium with or without 100 mM NaCl and incubating them for 14 days. Under non-stressed conditions, the relative growth of the pao mutants was similar to WT, and no difference in growth was observed among mutants (Supplementary Figure S1A). When grown on 100 mM NaCl, primary root growth was inhibited to a similar extent among WT and all pao mutants (Supplementary Figures S1A,B).

Growth Responses of pao1pao5 and pao2pao4 Mutants Under High Salt Stress

Of the five AtPAOs, two (AtPAO1 and AtPAO5) localize to the cytoplasm and three (AtPAO2, AtPAO3, and AtPAO4) reside in peroxisome. Thus, we first aimed to generate the mutants which either lost cytoplasmic PAO activity (pao1 pao5) or lost peroxisomal PAO activity (pao2 pao3 pao4) (Andronis et al., 2014). We obtained two pao double mutants, pao1 pao5 and pao2 pao4, by crossing. We further tried to get a triple mutant, pao2 pao3 pao4, by crossing pao2 pao4 and pao3, three times, but failed to get it. Therefore, we used the two double mutants, pao1 pao5 and pao2 pao4, in this study. We confirmed the identity of the mutants by PCR, finding that both double mutants contained T-DNA inserted in both DNA strands of PAO1 and PAO5 and of PAO2 and PAO4, respectively (Supplementary Figure S2). We then examined PAO transcript levels in the mutants. In pao1pao5, AtPAO2, AtPAO3, and AtPAO4 transcript levels were a bit higher than those of WT, whereas AtPAO1 and AtPAO5 transcript levels were reduced to 20 and 0.7%, respectively, compared to WT (Supplementary Figures S3A,B). In pao2 pao4, the levels of AtPAO1, AtPAO2, AtPAO3, AtPAO4, and AtPAO5 transcripts were approximately 150, 0.03, 170, 18, and 160% those of WT, respectively (Supplementary Figures S3A,C), further confirming the identity of both mutants. Next, we tested the growth of these double mutants under high salt conditions. Interestingly, pao1 pao5 was less sensitive to NaCl than WT (Figures 1A,B), whereas pao2 pao4 showed WT levels of NaCl sensitivity (Figures 1C,D). The use of increasing concentrations of NaCl confirmed the NaCl tolerance of pao1 pao5. Finally, the primary roots of the mutant were significantly longer (140∼178%) than those of WT when grown in 50–100 mM NaCl (Figures 1E,F). Therefore, the pao1 pao5 mutant is NaCl tolerant compared to WT.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Growth responses of pao1 pao5 and pao2 pao4 to various concentrations of NaCl. (A) Growth response of pao1 pao5 to 100 mM NaCl. (B) Root lengths of WT and pao1 pao5 with or without 100 mM NaCl after a 14 days incubation. The values indicate means ± SE (n = 5). (C) Growth response of pao2 pao4 to 100 mM NaCl. (D) Average root length of WT and pao2 pao4 with or without 100 mM NaCl after a 14 days incubation. The values indicate means ± SE (n = 5). (E) Growth responses of WT and pao1pao5 plants to different NaCl levels in MS agar medium. Two representative plants, each incubated for 14 days, were photographed. (F) Root length of WT and pao1 pao5 grown on MS agar medium containing 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 mM NaCl for 14 days. The values indicate means ± SE (n = 5). Asterisk indicates significant difference between WT (Col-0) and pao1 pao5; ∗∗P < 0.01.

Growth Responses of pao1pao5 to Drought Stress

We also tested the growth responses of the pao1 pao5 mutant to drought stress, along with those of WT, pao1, and pao5. Under well-watered conditions, WT, pao1, pao5, and pao1 pao5 grew at comparable rates. By contrast, once the water supply was stopped, the double mutant lived longer than WT and both single mutants (Figure 2A, Supplementary Figure S4). Next we measured water loss in these plants upon dehydration. At 20 min after the onset of dehydration, the double mutant still retained approximately 50% of its water content, whereas WT and the single mutants lost more than 60% of their water contents (Figure 2B).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Drought responses of WT, pao1, pao5, and pao1 pao5 plants, and their rates of water loss. (A) Left, WT, pao1, pao5, and pao1 pao5 plants were grown in Vermiculite/Supermix A (1:1 v/v) for 28 days. Right, water supply was stopped at 28 days and the plants were further incubated for 14 days. (B) Water loss rate from WT, pao1, pao5, and pao1 pao5 plantlets. Two-week-old plantlets (n = 25) grown on MS agar medium were carefully detached from the plates and placed onto dry filter paper (Whatman #2) and their fresh weight was measured at various time intervals. Asterisk indicates significant difference: P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01.

Na and K (Potassium) Contents in WT, pao1, pao5, and pao1pao5 Plants Exposed to High Salt

At 12 h after NaCl treatment, the Na and K contents in pao5 mutant were about 70 and 80% levels compared to those of WT, whereas those in pao1 pao5 double mutant were comparable to those of WT (Figures 3A,B). At 24 h of stress treatment, the Na contents in pao1, pao5, and pao1 pao5 mutants were similarly lower (74–79%) than in WT (Figure 3A), whereas the K contents were similar among all plant samples (Figure 3B).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Na (A) and K (B) contents in WT, pao1, pao5, and pao1 pao5 plants exposed to 100 mM NaCl. Asterisk indicates significant difference: P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01.

Changes in PA Contents in WT and pao1pao5 Plants Exposed to High Salt

In WT, Put levels increased to 180% at 6 h after 100 mM NaCl treatment, and then gradually decreased until 24 h but still retained 145% level. In the pao1 pao5 mutant, Put content remained at constant levels (6 nmol/g FW) until 12 h after NaCl treatment and then increased to ca. 9 nmol/g FW at 24 h (Supplementary Figure S5A). Spd contents gradually decreased to around 75% levels in both WT and the mutant upon high salt exposure, with not much difference observed between lines (Supplementary Figure S5B). T-Spm content in pao1 pao5 was 2.8-folds higher than that of WT under physiological condition (Supplementary Figure S5C). T-Spm content decreased to one-third level in WT at 24 h after NaCl treatment. Even in the double mutant, the T-Spm level decreased to 80% at 24 h after NaCl treatment but was still 6.5-folds higher than that of WT (Supplementary Figure S5C). Spm contents in both WT and pao1 pao5 increased 170 and 150% levels, respectively, at 24 h after salt treatment, although their modulation patterns differed (Supplementary Figure S5D).

Comparison of PAO Activity, H2O2 Levels, and Super Oxide Anion Levels in WT vs. pao1, pao5, and pao1pao5 Plants Exposed to High Salt

We then measured PAO activity in the plants, finding that under non-stressed conditions, the highest to lowest relative PAO activity occurred in WT > pao1 > pao5 > pao1 pao5 (Figure 4A). Under NaCl treatment, PAO activity in WT increased approximately 1.5-fold. After NaCl treatment, the plants with the highest to lowest relative PAO activity were again WT > pao1 > pao5 > pao1 pao5 (Figure 4A). The relative PAO activity of the double mutant decreased to 62% of that of WT after NaCl treatment (Figure 4A). Since H2O2 is produced through the action of PAO, we examined H2O2 levels in plants after NaCl treatment. The plants with the highest to lowest H2O2 levels were WT > pao1 = pao5 > pao1 pao5 under physiological- and high salt conditions. H2O2 content in the double mutant was 81% of that of WT in normal condition (Figure 4B). H2O2 levels in WT, pao1 and pao5 increased about 16–21% after NaCl treatment, whereas that in the double mutant increased 8% upon salt treatment (Figure 4B). We also examined the super oxide anion (O2-) levels in these plants. Under control conditions, O2- levels were slightly lower (86%) in pao1 pao5 than in WT and the single mutants. Upon NaCl treatment, O2- levels increased approximately 1.4-fold in WT and in both single mutants, whereas in the double mutant, O2- level increased to1.2-fold (Figure 4C). Thirty % of O2- production decreased in the NaCl-treated double mutant compared to that in NaCl-treated WT, pao1 and pao5 mutants (Figure 4C). Collectively, the results indicate that the increased H2O2 and O2- levels in the NaCl-treated double mutant were less significant in relative to those in NaCl-treated WT and the single mutants. The results were further supported by histochemical detection of O2- and H2O2 (Figure 5). In WT, pao1, and pao5 single mutants, intense blue formazan precipitates were detected after NaCl treatment, while such signals were weak in the pao1 pao5 double mutant, which is indicative of less O2- accumulation (Figures 5A,B). Similarly, intense brown precipitates were observed in WT and both single mutants treated with NaCl, whereas those in the double mutant were faint, indicating lower H2O2 accumulation in the double mutant (Figures 5C,D). The pao2 pao4 mutant seemed to produce the similar levels of O2- and H2O2 compared to those of WT upon NaCl treatment (Supplementary Figures S6A,B).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Comparison of PAO activity (A), H2O2 production (B), and O2- production (C) in WT, pao1, pao5 single mutants, and pao1 pao5 double mutant upon NaCl treatment. Asterisk indicates significant difference: P < 0.05, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Histochemical analysis of O2- (A,B) and H2O2 (C,D) accumulation in WT, pao1, pao5, and pao1 pao5 after NaCl treatment. (A,B) NBT staining; (C,D) DAB staining. (A,C) Stained whole seedling; (B,D) enlarged cotyledon leaves. Bar indicates 1 mm.

Changes of Electrolyte Leakage and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities, and Expressional Changes of Antioxidant Enzyme Genes in WT and pao1 pao5 Mutant

We compared the leakage rate of electrolytes between WT and the double mutant upon NaCl treatment but could not see a clear difference. Upon NaCl treatment, both WT and the mutant leaked the electrolytes ∼30% more compared to the non-treated seedlings (Figure 6A). Next we compared the activities of antioxidant enzymes, catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), SOD and POX of WT and the mutant. The activities of CAT, APX, and SOD were enhanced ∼20–30% in WT upon NaCl treatment, while the POX activity was not changed in WT (Figure 6B). In the mutant, CAT and POX activities were ∼20–30% higher than those of non-stressed WT, but not modulated by salt treatment. Net SOD activity in the mutant increased to 140% levels upon salt treatment as like WT (Figure 6B).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Biochemical analyses of WT and pao1 pao5 mutant upon high salt stress. (A) Electrolyte leakage; (B) Enzyme activities of catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and peroxidase (POX) in WT and the double mutant with or without 100 mM NaCl treatment for 6 h.

Furthermore we compared the transcript levels of CAT, APX, and SOD genes in WT and the mutant. Among three CAT genes, CAT1 and CAT3 were induced 0.2-fold and 2-fold levels in WT by salt treatment, whereas they were induced 2.9 and 3.7-fold levels in the double mutant. CAT2 transcripts decreased to ∼50% levels both in WT and the mutant after 6 h salt treatment (Figure 7A). Of ascorbate peroxidase genes (APX1 to -4), the transcript levels of APX2, APX3, and APX4 kept constant or decreased to 50% levels, respectively (Figure 7B). APX1 and stromal ascorbate peroxidase gene (sAPX) behaved similarly. Namely upon salt stress APX1 and sAPX transcripts increased to 1.4 and 1.2-fold, respectively, in WT, and their basal transcript levels in the double mutant were 70 and 80% compared to those of WT and they accumulated to 170 and 160% levels in relative to those of non-stressed WT (Figure 7B). Of three plastidial Fe-SOD genes, Fe SOD2 and Fe SOD3 transcripts increased to 1.6-fold levels in the double mutant (Figure 7C). Mitochondrial Mn SOD was induced to 1.6-fold levels only in the mutant after salt treatment (Figure 7C). Cu/Zn SOD1 and Cu/Zn SOD2 were not much modulated at the transcriptional level by salt treatment, whereas Cu/Zn SOD3 was induced to 1.8-fold levels both in WT and the mutant (Figure 7C).

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Expressional changes of CAT, APX, and SOD genes in WT and pao1 pao5 mutant upon high salt stress. (A) CAT genes; (B) APX genes; (C) SOD genes. (-) control; (+) treated with 100 mM NaCl for 6 h. Asterisk indicates significant difference: P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01.

Expressional Changes of Key Genes Involved in Adaptation to High Salt Stress in WT and pao1 pao5 Mutant

Previous investigations have revealed several genes encoding key components involved in adaptation to high salt conditions in Arabidopsis (Zhu, 2002). One such pathway is the Ca2+-dependent Salt Overly Sensitive (SOS) pathway, which consists of three components: SOS3 (calcium binding protein), SOS2 (SNF1-like protein kinase), and SOS1 (plasma membrane-localized Na+/H+ antiporter; Mahajan et al., 2008; Ji et al., 2013). In addition, HKT1 (high affinity potassium transporter1 localized in plasma membrane) and NHX1 (vacuolar-localized Na+/H+ exchanger) play important roles in Na+ uptake and Na+-sequestration to vacuole, respectively (Apse et al., 1999). We therefore measured the transcript levels of genes encoding these key components. Among SOS pathway genes, SOS3 was transiently upregulated to twofold levels in the double mutant after 3 h NaCl treatment and returned to the basal level at 6 h, while SOS2 transcripts gradually accumulated to threefold levels in the double mutant compared to WT at 6 h (Figures 8A,B). SOS1 transcripts accumulated to 1.8-fold in WT both at 3 and 6 h after NaCl treatment (Figure 8C). In both the single mutants, they accumulated to fourfold levels at 3 h after NaCl treatment and returned to twofold levels as similar as WT (Figure 8C). In the double mutant, they reached to five and threefold levels, respectively, at 3 and 6 h compared to those of non-stressed WT (Figure 8C). Upregulation of NHX1 occurred at 6 h after NaCl treatment only in the double mutant, whereas no change in HKT1 expression was observed in any plants after NaCl treatment (Figures 8D,E).

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Changes in the expression of genes involved in the SOS-signaling pathway (A–C) and Na transporter genes (D,E) in WT, pao1, pao5, and pao1 pao5 upon high salt stress. Asterisk indicates significant difference: P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.

The second pathway is an ABA-dependent signaling pathway that includes several transcription factors (TFs), such as AREB1, AREB2, and the downstream component RD29B (Fujita et al., 2011). The third pathway is an ABA-independent pathway that includes several TFs, such as CBFs, and the CBFs’ target components RD29A and COR15A. Among ABA-dependent signaling pathway genes, AREB1 transcripts accumulated 15- and 20-fold in WT at 3 and 6 h salt treatment, while they reached to 32 and 48-fold levels in the double mutant (Figure 9A). A similar trend was observed for the other bZIP gene, AREB2; i.e., it was induced to two and fourfold levels in WT at 3 and 6 h, respectively, upon NaCl treatment, whereas in the double mutant the transcript levels rose to 3.8 and 8.9-fold levels at 3 and 6 h after NaCl treatment (Figure 9B). Expression profiles of RD29B, RD22, and RAB18 upon salt treatment were quite similar to that of AREB1 (Figures 9C,E,F). At 6 h-salt treatment, RD29B transcripts increased 16-fold in WT, while in the double mutant they reached to 92-fold levels (Figure 9C). RD22 and RAB18 were up-regulated to 25 and 27-fold levels at 6 h in WT, while their transcripts reached to 120 and 54-fold levels in the double mutant (Figures 9E,F). COR15B was more quickly induced by salt treatment. In WT, the transcripts accumulated 23 and 13-fold at 3 and 6 h salt treatment, and in the double mutant they reached to 56 and 24-fold levels at 3 and 6 h treatment (Figure 9D). In the ABA-independent pathway, CBF3 was induced at 2–2.6-fold levels in WT, while it was induced to 4.5–6-fold levels in the double mutant (Figure 9G). We tested the expression of four CBFs. Of them, only CBF3 was upregulated by NaCl treatment (Supplementary Figure S7). The downstream target genes, RD29A and COR15A, of CBF3 were also induced at 45–95-fold levels and 70–75-fold levels in WT and 100–250-fold levels and 175–200-fold levels in the double mutant (Figures 9H,I).

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 9

Changes in the expression of genes involved in the ABA-dependent pathway (A–F) and in the ABA-independent signaling pathway (G–I) in WT, pao1, pao5, and pao1 pao5 upon high salt stress. Asterisk indicates significant difference compared to that of WT: P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01.

Discussion

Here we documented that the Arabidopsis mutant plant, pao1 pao5, which lost cytoplasmic PAO activity is tolerant to high salt and drought stresses through the activation of subsets of defense-related genes and the reduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production.

In this double mutant as well as in each single mutant, pao1 and pao5, intake of Na ions was reduced to ∼75% of that in WT (Figure 3). The expression of AtHKT1, which controls Na+ entry into plant roots (Rus et al., 2001), was comparable among WT, pao1, pao5 and the double mutant (Figure 8E), and the expression of AtSOS1, which encodes a Na+/H+ antiporter in plasma membrane (Zhu, 2002), was higher in both the single mutants and the double mutant in relative to that of WT (Figure 8C). If the respective transcript levels of the above transporter genes reflect their transporter activity, reduction of Na intake in the pao1, pao5 and pao1 pao5 is reasonable. However, the reduced Na intake does not simply explain the tolerant phenotype of the double mutant because each single mutants were salt-sensitive (Supplementary Figure S1). Two other SOS pathway members, AtSOS2 and AtSOS3, were induced at higher levels in the double mutant compared to WT while their induction profiles differed (Figures 8A,B). Cross-talk between AtSOS2 and AtNHX1 (Apse et al., 1999; Yamaguchi et al., 2013, references therein) was evidenced (Qiu et al., 2004; Batelli et al., 2007). In sos2 mutant, tonoplast Na+/H+ exchange activity which is performed by AtNHX1 was greatly reduced. Addition of activated SOS2 increased tonoplast Na+/H+ exchange activity in vesicles isolated from sos2 (Qiu et al., 2004). AtNHX1 transcripts increased to fourfold levels upon salt treatment only in pao1 pao5 mutant but not in WT, pao1 and pao5 (Figure 8D). Since PAs can activate Ca2+-channels and modulate H+-ATPase pump activity (Pottosin et al., 2014), it is likely that AtNHX1 activity and the rate of cytoplasmic Na+ sequestration into the vacuole are higher in the double mutant than in the WT. Higher Na+ sequestration to vacuole may partially explain the salt tolerant phenomenon of the double mutant. Plants respond to high salinity by activating abscisic acid (ABA)-dependent and ABA-independent signaling pathways comprising regulatory genes like TF (Yoshida et al., 2014). Among the genes in the ABA-dependent pathway, at least two key TF genes, AREB1 and AREB2 (Yoshida et al., 2010), and the target genes RD29B and RAB18 were significantly induced in the double mutant, and the other ABA-responsive gene RD22, which is regulated by RD22BP1 (MYC2; Fujita et al., 2011; Osakabe et al., 2014), was induced at the higher levels in the double mutant (Figures 9A–C,E). Of the ABA-independent pathway genes, CBF3/DREB1A and its targets, RD29A and COR15A, were also upregulated in the double mutant (Figures 9G–I). The enhanced expression of those defense-related genes in the double mutant may also help toward explaining why it was NaCl tolerant compared to WT, pao1 and pao5.

The reason why the hyper-induction of subsets of defense genes occurs in the double mutant is still covered. AtPAO5 functions in T-Spm catabolism in Arabidopsis (Kim et al., 2014). In the pao5 single mutant, T-Spm levels were twofold higher compared with those in WT (Kim et al., 2014). The recombinant AtPAO1 favored T-Spm over the other PAs (Takahashi et al., 2010). In fact, pao1 pao5 mutant contained ∼2.8-fold higher T-Spm compared to WT (Supplementary Figure S5C). Exogenously applied T-Spm is able to induce the defense-related genes in Arabidopsis (Sagor et al., 2012). Therefore, endogenously accumulated T-Spm itself or a combination of T-Spm and unidentified other factor(s) may contribute as signaling molecule(s) for the gene induction. This point needs to be addressed in the future.

ROS such as H2O2 and O2- have two ‘faces’: one is acting as toxic by-products of aerobic metabolism and the other is functioning as signaling molecules to control various processes, such as programmed cell death (PCD) and biotic/abiotic stress responses (Mittler, 2002; Miller et al., 2010). PAOs are H2O2-forming enzymes (Mittler, 2002; Cona et al., 2006; Kusano et al., 2015). Actually it was shown that ROS (H2O2) produced via a PAO action emit a signal to induce PCD in tobacco cell culture (Yoda et al., 2006). It was also reported that PAs control ROS homeostasis during salt stress in plants (Saha et al., 2015). Total PA contents in the double mutant were a bit higher (45.26 nmol/g FW), especially T-Spm, than in WT (42.81 nmol/g FW) after salt treatment (Supplementary Figure S5). Basal enzymatic activities of CAT and POX in the double mutant were ∼20–30% higher than those in WT (Figure 6B), whereas those of APX and SOD were comparable in WT and the double mutant (Figure 6B). Whether the higher CAT and POX activities contribute to the enhanced salinity tolerance of pao1pao5 mutant is unclear. To discuss about the potency of each PA to regulate ROS homeostasis or control antioxidant enzyme activity, further works are required.

The reduced ROS, H2O2, and O2-, production in pao1 pao5 compared with those in WT upon salt treatment was confirmed quantitatively (Figures 4B,C) and qualitatively (Figure 5). Intriguingly histochemical staining method showed that net production of H2O2 and O2- was clearly lower in the double mutant compared with those in WT, pao1, pao5 (Figure 5) and in the other double mutant pao2 pao4 (Supplementary Figure S6). This reduced ROS production may partially explain the different response against salt stress among WT, each single mutants and pao1 pao5 mutant.

Lastly, in keeping with this topic, we have to refer the works done by Moschou et al. (2008a): they generated transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing maize-derived PAO. Those transgenic plants were unable to cope with oxidative stresses induced by methyl viologen, menadione, and exogenous H2O2 (Moschou et al., 2008a). Then, they generated transgenic tobacco plants in which the expression of the apoplastic PAO gene was downregulated by an anti-sense method: those plants exhibited increased biomass production on MS medium supplemented with 100 mM or 200 mM NaCl (Moschou et al., 2008b). They interpreted that, upon salt stress, plants secreted Spd into apoplastic space, which was catabolized by apoplastic PAO and produced H2O2. The anti-sense PAO plant produced less H2O2 and exhibited less PCD, on the other hand, the tobacco plant overexpressing the apoplastic PAO gene produced higher levels of H2O2 but failed to induce stress-responsive genes.

In Arabidopsis, there are five AtPAO genes. Of them, AtPAO1, AtPAO2, and AtPAO3 were responsive to salt stress, whereas AtPAO4 and AtPAO5 were not (Supplementary Figure S8). AtPAO1 is expressed in the transition region between the meristematic and the elongation zone of roots and anther tapetum. Its expression is also ABA responsive, especially in root tip (Fincato et al., 2012). Especially AtPAO1 seemed to be involved in salt stress response. Since the pao1 pao5 mutant completes its life cycle, the loss of cytoplasmic PAO activity does not disturb full development. It is of interest whether other plants silencing cytoplasmic PAO pathway become salt and/or drought tolerant. If it is the case, it provides an alternative way to generate salt/drought tolerant plants.

Author Contributions

GS, SZ, SK, TB, and TK designed the experiments. GS, SZ, SK, SS and TB performed the experiments. GS, SZ, SK, SS analyzed the data. TB and TK wrote the paper.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Dr. Chihiro Inoue is acknowledged for guiding us on the use of the ICP spectroscope. This work was supported by grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) to TK (15K14705, 2604081). GS was supported by a JSPS postdoctoral fellowship for foreign researchers.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2016.00214

References

  1. Ahou A., Martignago D., Alabdallah O., Tavazza R., Stano P., Macone A., et al. (2014). A plant spermine oxidase/dehydrogenase regulated by the proteasome and polyamines. J. Exp. Bot. 65 1585–1603. 10.1093/jxb/eru016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alcázar R., Altabella T., Marco F., Bortolotti C., Reymond M., Koncz C., et al. (2010). Polyamines: molecules with regulatory functions in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Planta 231 1237–1249. 10.1007/s00425-010-1130-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andronis E. A., Moschou P. N., Toumi I., Roubelakis-Angelakis K. A. (2014). Peroxisomal polyamine oxidase and NADPH-oxidase cross-talk for ROS homeostasis which affects respiration rate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 5:132 10.3389/fpls.2014.00132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Angelini R., Tisi A., Rea G., Chen M. M., Botta M., Federico R., et al. (2008). Involvement of polyamine oxidase in wound healing. Plant Physiol. 146 162–177. 10.1104/pp.107.108902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Apse M. P., Aharon G. S., Snedden W. A., Blumwald E. (1999). Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis. Science 285 1256–1258. 10.1126/science.285.5431.1256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bagni N., Tassoni A. (2001). Biosynthesis, oxidation and conjugation of aliphatic polyamines in higher plants. Amino Acids 20 301–317. 10.1007/s007260170046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Batelli G., Verslues P. E., Agius F., Qiu Q., Fujii H., Pan S., et al. (2007). SOS2 promotes salt tolerance in part by interacting with the vacuolar H+-ATPase and upregulating its transport activity. Mol. Cell Biol. 27 7781–7790. 10.1128/MCB.00430-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Beers R. F., Jr., Sizer I. W. (1952). A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. J. Biol. Chem. 195 133–140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Berberich T., Sagor G. H. M., Kusano T. (2015). “Polyamines in plant stress response,” in Polyamine: A Universal Molecular Nexus for Growth, Survival and Specialised Metabolism, eds Kusano T., Suzuki H. (Berlin: Springer; ), 155–168. [Google Scholar]
  10. Capell T., Bassie L., Christou P. (2004). Modulation of the polyamine biosynthetic pathway in transgenic rice confers tolerance to drought stress. Plant Biol. 101 9909–9914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cohen S. S. (1998). A Guide to the Polyamines. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cona A., Rea G., Angelini R., Federico R., Tavladoraki P. (2006). Functions of amine oxidases in plant development and defense. Trends Plant Sci. 11 80–88. 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Doke N. (1983). Involvement of superoxide anion generation in the hypersensitive response of potato tuber tissues to infection with an incompatible race of Phytophtora infestans and the hyphal wall components. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 23 345–357. 10.1016/0048-4059(83)90020-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Federico R., Cona A., Angelini R., Schininà M. E., Giartosio A. (1990). Characterization of maize polyamine oxidase. Phytochemistry 29 2411–2414. 10.1016/0031-9422(90)85157-B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fincato P., Moschou P. N., Ahou A., Angelini R., Roubelakis-Angelakis K. A., Federico R., et al. (2012). The members of Arabidopsis thaliana PAO gene family exhibit distinct tissue- and organ-specific expression pattern during seedling growth and flower development. Amino Acids 42 831–841. 10.1007/s00726-011-0999-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fincato P., Moschou P. N., Spedaletti V., Tavazza R., Angelini R., Federico R., et al. (2011). Functional diversity inside the Arabidopsis polyamine oxidase gene family. J. Exp. Bot. 62 1155–1168. 10.1093/jxb/erq341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fuell C., Elliot K. A., Hanfrey C. C., Franceschetti M., Michael A. J. (2010). Polyamine biosynthetic diversity in plants and algae. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 48 513–520. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.02.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fujita Y., Fujita M., Shinozaki K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. (2011). ABA-mediated transcriptional regulation in response to osmotic stress in plants. J. Plant Res. 124 509–525. 10.1007/s10265-011-0412-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Groppa M. D., Benavides M. P. (2008). Polyamines and abiotic stress: recent advances. Amino Acids 34 35–45. 10.1007/s00726-007-0501-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hanfrey C., Sommer S., Mayer M. J., Burtin D., Michael A. J. (2001). Arabidopsis polyamine biosynthesis: absence of ornithine decarboxylase and the mechanism of arginine decarboxylase activity. Plant J. 27 551–560. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2001.01100.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ji H., Pardo J. M., Batelli G., Oosten M. J. V., Bressan R. A., Li X. (2013). The salt overly sensitive (SOS) pathway: established and emerging roles. Mol. Plant 6 275–286. 10.1093/mp/sst017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kakehi J., Kuwashiro Y., Niitsu M., Takahashi T. (2008). Thermospermine is required for stem elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 49 1342–1349. 10.1093/pcp/pcn109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kamada-Nobusada T., Hayashi M., Fukazawa M., Sakakibara H., Nishimura M. (2008). A putative peroxisomal polyamine oxidase, AtPAO4, is involved in polyamine catabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 49 1272–1282. 10.1093/pcp/pcn114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim D. W., Watanabe K., Murayama C., Izawa S., Niitsu M., Michael A. J., et al. (2014). Polyamine oxidase5 regulates Arabidopsis thaliana growth through a thermospermine oxidase activity. Plant Physiol. 165 1575–1590. 10.1104/pp.114.242610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Knott J. M., Romer P., Sumper M. (2007). Putative spermine synthases from Thalassiosira pseudonana and Arabidopsis thaliana synthesize thermospermine rather than spermine. FEBS Lett. 581 3081–3086. 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.05.074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kusano T., Berberich T., Tateda C., Takahashi Y. (2008). Polyamines: essential factors for growth and survival. Planta 228 367–381. 10.1007/s00425-008-0772-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kusano T., Kim D. W., Liu T., Berberich T. (2015). “Polyamine catabolism in plants,” in Polyamine: A Universal Molecular Nexus for Growth, Survival and Specialised Metabolism, eds Kusano T., Suzuki H. (Berlin: Springer; ), 77–88. [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu J., Liu Y. L. (2004). The relations between polyamine types and forms and polyamine oxidase activities in barley seedlings under salt stress. J. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol. 30 141–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu J.-H., Wang W., Wu H., Gong X., Moriguchi T. (2015). Polyamines function in stress tolerance: from synthesis to regulation. Front. Plant Sci. 6:827 10.3389/fpls.2015.00827 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mahajan S., Pandey G. K., Tuteja N. (2008). Calcium- and salt-stress signaling in plants: shedding light on SOS pathway. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 471 146–158. 10.1016/j.abb.2008.01.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mattoo A. K., Minocha S. C., Minocha R., Handa A. K. (2010). Polyamines and cellular metabolism in plants: transgenic approaches reveal different responses to diamine putresciner versus higher polyamines spermidine and spermine. Amino Acids 38 405–413. 10.1007/s00726-009-0399-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. McCord J. M., Fridovich I. (1969). Superoxida dismutase an enzymic function for erythrocuprein (hemocuprein). J. Biol. Chem. 244 6049–6055. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Messner B., Boll M. (1994). Cell suspension cultures of spruce (Picea abies): inactivation of extracellular enzymes by fungal elicitor-induced transient release of hydrogen peroxide (oxidative burst). Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 39 69–78. 10.1007/BF00037594 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Miller G. A. D., Suzuki N., Ciftci-Yilmaz S., Mittler R. (2010). Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signaling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 33 453–467. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02041.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Minocha R., Majumdar R., Minocha S. C. (2014). Polyamines and abiotic stress in plants: a complex relationship. Front. Plant Sci. 5:175 10.3389/fpls.2014.00175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mittler R. (2002). Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 7 405–410. 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02312-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mo H., Wang X., Zhang Y., Zhang G., Zhang J., Ma Z. (2015). Cotton polyamine oxidase is required for spermine and camalexin signaling in the defence response to Verticillium dahlie. Plant J. 83 962–975. 10.1111/tpj.12941 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Moschou P. N., Delis I. D., Paschalidis K. A., Roubelakis-Angelakis K. A. (2008a). Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing polyamine oxidase are not able to cope with oxidative burst generated by abiotic factors. Physiol. Plant 133 140–156. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01049.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Moschou P. N., Paschalidis K. A., Delis I. D., Andriopoulou A. H., Lagiotis G. D., Yakoumakis D. I., et al. (2008b). Spermidine exodus and oxidation in the apoplast induced by abiotic stress is responsible for H2O2 signatures that direct tolerance responses in tobacco. Plant Cell 20 1708–1724. 10.1105/tpc.108.059733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Moschou P. N., Sanmartin M., Andriopoulou A. H., Rojo E., Sanchez-Serrano J. J., Roubelakis-Angelakis K. A. (2008c). Bridging the gap between plant and mammalian polyamine catabolism: a novel peroxisomal polyamine oxidase responsible for a full back-conversion pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 147 1845–1857. 10.1104/pp.108.123802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Moschou P. N., Wu J., Cona A., Tavladoraki P., Angelini R., Roubelakis-Angelakis K. A. (2012). The polyamines and their catabolic products are significant players in the turnover of nitrogenous molecules in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 63 5003–5015. 10.1093/jxb/ers202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Naka Y., Watanabe K., Sagor G. H. M., Niitsu M., Pillai A., Kusano T., et al. (2010). Quantitative analysis of plant polyamines including thermospermine during growth and salinity stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 48 527–533. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.01.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nakano Y., Asada K. (1987). Purification of ascorbate peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts; its inactivation in ascorbate-depleted medium and reactivation by monodehydroascorbate radical. Plant Cell Physiol. 28 131–140. [Google Scholar]
  44. Niitsu M., Samejima K. (1986). Synthesis of a series of linear pentaamines with three and four methylene chain intervals. Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo) 34 1032–1038. 10.1248/cpb.34.1032 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Osakabe Y., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., Shinozaki K., Tran L.-S. (2014). ABA control of plant macroelement membrane transport system in response to water deficit and high salinity. New Phytol. 202 35–49. 10.1111/nph.12613 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Planas-Portell J., Gallart M., Tiburcio A. F., Altabella T. (2013). Copper-containing amine oxidases contribute to terminal polyamine oxidation in peroxisomes and apoplast of Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 13:109 10.1186/1471-2229-13-109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Pottosin I., Velarde-Buendia A. M., Bose J., Fuglsang A. T., Shabala S. (2014). Polyamines cause plasma membrane depolarization, activate Ca2+-, and modulate H+-ATPase pump activity in pea roots. J. Exp. Bot. 65 2463–2472. 10.1093/jxb/eru133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Qiu Q.-S., Guo Y., Quintero F. J., Pardo J. M., Schumaker K. S., Zhu J.-K. (2004). Regulation of vacuolar Na+/H+ exchange in Arabidopsis thaliana by the Salt-Overly-Sensitive (SOS) pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 279 207–215. 10.1074/jbc.M307982200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Roach T., Colville L., Beckett R. P., Minibayeva F. V., Havaux M., Kranner I. (2015). A proposed interplay between peroxidase, amine oxidase and lipoxygenase in the wounding-induced oxidative burst in Pisum sativum. Phytochemistry 112 130–138. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Romero-Puertas C. M., Rodriguez-Serrano F. J., Corpas M., Gomez L. A., Del Rio L., Sandalio M. (2004). Cadmium induced subcellular accumulation of O2- and H2O2 in pea leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 27 1122–1134. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01217.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Rus A., Yokoi S., Sharkhuu A., Reddy M., Lee B., Matsumoto T. K., et al. (2001). AtHKT1 is a salt tolerance determinant that controls Na+ entry into plant roots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98 14150–14155. 10.1073/pnas.241501798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sagor G. H. M., Inoue M., Kim D. W., Kojima S., Niitsu M., Berberich T., et al. (2015). The polyamine oxidase from lycophyte Selaginella lepidophylla (SelPAO5), unlike that of angiosperms, back-converts thermospermine to norspermidine. FEBS Lett. 589 3071–3078. 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.xyb08.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sagor G. H. M., Takahashi H., Niitsu M., Takahashi Y., Berberich T., Kusano T. (2012). Exogenous thermospermine has an activity to induce a subset of the defense genes and restrict cucumber mosaic virus multiplication in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep. 31 1227–1232. 10.1007/s00299-012-1243-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Saha J., Brauer E. K., Sengupta A., Popescu S. C., Gupta K., Gupta B. (2015). Polyamines as redox homeostasis regulators during salt stress in plants. Front. Environ. Sci. 3:21 10.3389/fenvs.2015.00021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Schmittgen T. D., Livak K. J. (2008). Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protoc. 3 1101–1108. 10.1038/nprot.2008.73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Tabor C. W., Tabor H. (1985). Polyamines in microorganisms. Microbiol. Rev. 49 81–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Takahashi Y., Cong R., Sagor G. H. M., Niitsu M., Berberich T., Kusano T. (2010). Characterization of five polyamine oxidase isoforms in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep. 29 955–965. 10.1007/s00299-010-0881-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Takano A., Kakehi J. I., Takahashi T. (2012). Thermospermine is not a minor polyamine in the plant kingdom. Plant Cell Physiol. 53 606–616. 10.1093/pcp/pcs019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Tavladoraki P., Rossi M. N., Saccuti G., Perez-Amador M. A., Polticelli F., Angelini R., et al. (2006). Heterologous expression and biochemical characterization of a polyamine oxidase from Arabidopsis involved in polyamine back conversion. Plant Physiol. 141 1519–1532. 10.1104/pp.106.080911 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Urano K., Yoshiba Y., Nanjo T., Igarashi Y., Seki M., Sekiguchi F., et al. (2003). Characterization of Arabidopsis genes involved in biosynthesis of polyamine in abiotic stress responses and developmental stages. Plant Cell Environ. 26 1917–1926. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01108.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wang W., Liu J. H. (2015). Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the polyamine oxidase gene family in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis). Gene 555 421–429. 10.1016/j.gene.2014.11.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Weigel D., Glazebrook J. (2002). Arabidopsis, A Laboratory Manual. New York, NY: Cold Spring Harbor. [Google Scholar]
  63. Yamaguchi K., Takahashi Y., Berberich T., Imai A., Miyazaki A., Takahashi T., et al. (2006). The polyamine spermine protects against high salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 580 6783–6788. 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.10.078 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Yamaguchi K., Takahashi Y., Berberich T., Imai A., Takahashi T., Michael A., et al. (2007). A protective role for the polyamine spermine against drought stress in Arabidopsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 352 486–490. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.11.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Yamaguchi T., Hamamoto S., Uozumi N. (2013). Sodium transport system in plant cells. Front. Plant Sci. 4:410 10.3389/fpls.2013.00410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Yoda H., Hiroi Y., Sano H. (2006). Polyamine oxidase is one of the key elements for oxidative burst to induce programmed cell death in tobacco cultured cells. Plant Physiol. 142 193–206. 10.1104/pp.106.080515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Yoshida T., Fujita Y., Sayama H., Kidokoro S., Maruyama K., Mizoi J., et al. (2010). AREB1, AREB2, and ABF3 are master transcription factors that cooperatively regulate ABRE-dependent ABA signaling involved in drought stress tolerance and require ABA for full activation. Plant J. 61 672–685. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04092.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Yoshida T., Mogami J., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. (2014). ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling in response to osmotic stress in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 21 133–139. 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhu J. K. (2002). Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 53 247–273. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.143329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES