Abstract
Background. Biological therapeutics such as adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy are gaining acceptance for knee-osteoarthritis (OA) treatment. Reports of OA-patients show reductions in cartilage defects and regeneration of hyaline-like-cartilage with MSC-therapy. Suspending MSCs in hyaluronan commonly occurs in animals and humans, usually without supporting data. Objective. To elucidate the effects of different concentrations of hyaluronan on MSC growth kinetics. Methods. Using a range of hyaluronan concentrations, we measured MSC adherence and proliferation on culture plastic surfaces and a novel cartilage-adhesion assay. We employed time-course and dispersion imaging to assess MSC binding to cartilage. Cytokine profiling was also conducted on the MSC-secretome. Results. Hyaluronan had dose-dependent effects on growth kinetics of MSCs at concentrations of entanglement point (1 mg/mL). At higher concentrations, viscosity effects outweighed benefits of additional hyaluronan. The cartilage-adhesion assay highlighted for the first time that hyaluronan-primed MSCs increased cell attachment to cartilage whilst the presence of hyaluronan did not. Our time-course suggested patients undergoing MSC-therapy for OA could benefit from joint-immobilisation for up to 8 hours. Hyaluronan also greatly affected dispersion of MSCs on cartilage. Conclusion. Our results should be considered in future trials with MSC-therapy using hyaluronan as a vehicle, for the treatment of OA.
1. Introduction
Osteoarthritis is a degenerative disease characterised by degradation of cartilage and inflammation of the synovium [1]. Arthritic-degeneration and associated pain lead to reduced mobility, decreased economic contribution, and a significant healthcare burden of developed nations [2]. Conventional treatments of OA for middle-age sufferers are targeted at relieving pain using analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories [3]. Others include intra-articular injection of exogenous preparations of hyaluronan (HA) as a viscosupplementation therapy [4]. End stage treatment of OA involves surgical realignment or total knee replacement (TKR) with artificial prostheses. Increasing lifespan has exacerbated the problem and widened the treatment gap for middle aged sufferers who are not suitable candidates for TKR [5].
Recently, adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have shown promise as an OA therapeutic. Numerous in vitro studies have demonstrated that MSCs can differentiate into mesodermal cell types that form cartilage, bone, and fat. However, differentiation of implanted cells in vivo is a rarely documented mode of action. Perhaps differentiated allogeneic cells are not immune privileged and would be removed by the host immune system. Paracrine effects, both anti-inflammatory and trophic, via the secretion of a complex mixture of cytokines are currently a more accepted and well-studied mode of action [6]. The trophic action of cytokines acts to stimulate and mobilise endogenous MSCs to repair and regenerate tissue.
MSCs can improve function and pain in patients suffering from knee OA with minimal adverse events. Patients show a consistent reduction in the size of cartilage defects by the regeneration and neoformation of hyaline-like cartilage [7]. Manufacture of cell therapeutics for OA may involve the use of HA, particularly as a vehicle. The rationale for this is that HA is a core component of the extracellular matrix, endogenously abundant in the knee joint [8, 9] and approved for the treatment of knee OA.
Suspending MSCs in HA is common practice in rodents [10] and larger animals [11, 12] and for the treatment of OA in humans [13, 14]. MSCs and HA are safe and are used independently in humans; however there are few studies which explore the effect of HA on MSC growth kinetics, function, and tissue binding, especially with respect to cartilage.
Therefore our study sought to address alterations of MSC-HA growth kinetics and whether changes would persist in HA primed cells both on plastic and on articular cartilage. We employed a novel cartilage disc assay in a time series to determine adherence time and assessed the physical dispersion of MSCs over cartilage shedding light on the biological relevance of the physiochemical phenomena of HA entanglement point. As the mode of action of MSCs is secretion-driven, the cytokine profile was measured to assess clinical feasibility of the MSC-HA combination.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. MSC Growth Kinetics
Adherence. This experiment was undertaken on standard 96-well plates and CellBind 96-well plates (high-adherence; Corning, Australia) to test the effect of HA on different binding chemistries. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates at 5 × 103 cells/well using a combination of media preparations (see Supplementary Figure 1 in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9364213). A standard curve was seeded ranging from 1 × 103 to 16 × 103 cells/well. After 24 hours all wells were washed in PBS and 100 μL of control media was added. A further 10 μL of Cell Counting Kit-8 (water soluble tetrazolium salt, WST-8; CCK-8) reagent was added and following a four-hour incubation at 37°C, the absorbance measured at 450 nm (5 technical replicates; n = 3). Cell number was extrapolated from the standard curve using a trend line with a polynomial of two. Combinations of the media preparations (− +), (+ −), and (+ +) were compared back to cells grown in control media and seeded in control media (− −) using a Mann-Whitney test (nonparametric test).
Proliferation. This experiment was similar to the adherence protocol with minor differences. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates at 2 × 103 cells/well (5 technical replicates; n = 3). The standard curve was seeded on the second day, 24 hours before the 3-day endpoint.
2.2. MSCs Kinetics on Equine Articular Cartilage Explants: Ex Vivo Cartilage Assay
All horses used in this study were due to be sacrificed at a commercial abattoir to be processed and sold as dog food (Kankool Pet Food, Australia). The fetlock joint from mature horses was cut out by sawing 15 cm below and above the joint. The fetlock was then shaved, scrubbed, and soaked in iodine bath for a minimum contact time of 5 minutes and then frozen for later use.
2.3. Cartilage Sectioning
The frozen fetlock joint was thawed at 37 degrees for 1-2 hours until the fetlock joint became flexible. Once thawed, the joint was disarticulated in a sterile hood (see Supplementary Figure 2). The third metacarpal was obtained from the fetlock joint and the distal end was soaked in PBS for 5 minutes. The articular cartilage was then perforated using a custom designed hollow cylindrical instrument measuring 6.45 mm in diameter equal to a standard 96-well plate. The perforated discs were then sliced off with a scalpel and stored in the correct orientation (joint side facing up) in a 96-well plate with 200 μL of DMEM and frozen for later use.
2.4. Cartilage Adherence Time Course of MSCs
Cartilage discs were used to plug ultra-low adherence 96-well plates. Passage 2 cells were seeded onto the cartilage discs at a density of 5 × 103 cells/disc and incubated at 37°C/5% CO2. At each time point (1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 24 hours), cartilage discs were washed twice in PBS, fixed, and washed again. Cartilage discs were stained (see Supplementary Methods) and imaged using confocal microscopy.
2.5. HA Media Viscosity Assessment
Falling-ball viscometry was used to determine the viscosity (adapted from Eguchi and Karino, 2008 [15]) of HA media relative to control. Briefly, a 5 mL serological pipette was filled with prewarmed media. A biosilicate sphere was dropped and the time measured between two defined points. The data was expressed as a mean (5 technical replicates) flow-rate (millimetres/second) ± standard deviation.
2.6. MSC Dispersion on Cartilage with Increasing Concentration of HA
The media formulations used were control media and 0.5 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL, 2 mg/mL, 3 mg/mL, 4 mg/mL, and 5 mg/mL HA media. MSCs were seeded onto the cartilage discs at a density of 5 × 103 cells/disc. Following a 24-hour incubation, cartilage discs were washed twice in PBS, fixed, and washed again. Cartilage discs were stained (see Supplementary Methods) and imaged using confocal microscopy.
2.7. MSC Adherence and Proliferation on Cartilage
MSCs were treated with either control or 1 mg/mL HA media for three days. Ultra-low adherence 96-well plates were plugged with cartilage discs. The conditions tested included MSCs grown in control and seeded in control (− −), grown in control and seeded in 1 mg/mL HA media (− +), grown in 1 mg/mL HA media and seeded in control (+ −) (primed), and grown in 1 mg/mL HA media and seeded in 1 mg/mL HA media (+ +).
Adherence. MSCs were seeded onto cartilage discs at a density of 5 × 103 cells/disc. After 24 hours cartilage discs were removed to a new 96-well plate and washed twice with PBS. Fresh culture media (200 μL) were added to discs followed by 20 μL of CCK-8 and incubated for four hours at 37°C. Colour-developed wells were read at an absorbance of 450 nm (5 technical replicates; n = 3).
Proliferation. This experiment was undertaken in the same way as the adherence experiment; however the cells were cultured for 3 days and seeded at a density of 2 × 103 cells/disc.
2.8. Secretome Analysis
Conditioned media were collected from every flask in this study (n = 3), centrifuged at 5000 ×g for 5 minutes, and stored at −80°C. Filtrates (50 μL) were analysed using both the Bio-Plex Pro-Human Cytokine 27-Plex and Bio-Plex Pro-Human Cytokine 21-Plex assay (Bio-Rad, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions (see Supplementary Methods).
3. Results
3.1. MSCs Grown in Control Media and Seeded in HA Media
HA concentrations were compared to control, that is, (− −) versus (− +). In standard 96-well plates, the highest cell proliferation was observed for 1 mg/mL HA (p < 0.07). In high-adherence 96-well plates the 2 mg/mL HA decreased adherence by 45% (p < 0.05) (Figure 1).
3.2. MSCs Grown in HA Media and Seeded in Control Media (Priming)
MSCs grown in HA media (B–E) were compared to control (− −) versus (+ −). In standard 96-well plates, HA primed conditions showed peaked adherence for 0.5 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL HA (p < 0.05). Inversely, in high-adherence 96-well plates, adherence decreased with increasing concentration of HA and significantly for 2 mg/mL HA (p < 0.05). However in high-adherence 96-well plates, proliferative effects of HA priming recovered with 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/mL HA significantly (p < 0.05, <0.001, and <0.01, resp.) increased (Figure 2).
3.3. MSCs Grown in HA Media and Seeded in HA Media
MSCs grown in HA media (B–E) were compared to control (− −) versus (+ +). In standard 96-well plates, adherence showed a dose-dependent trend with a peak at 1 mg/mL HA (p < 0.001) and decreased in 2 mg/mL HA. Similarly proliferation with 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/mL HA increased but peaked at 1 mg/mL HA (p < 0.05, <0.01, and <0.01, resp.). Inversely in high-adherence 96-well plates, adherence decreased with increasing concentration of HA and significantly for 2 mg/mL HA (p < 0.01). However proliferation again increased with 0.5 and 1 mg/mL HA (p < 0.01, <0.001, resp.) (Figure 3).
3.4. Time Course of MSC Grown on Cartilage
Ultra-low adherence 96-well plates were plugged with cartilage discs and MSCs seeded in control media to assess adherence times from one to 24 hours (Figure 4). At the one-hour time point (a), only a handful of cells adhered to cartilage. At higher magnification (g) MSCs appeared to be spherical with extensions clearly visible. From three to four hours (c-d), MSCs covered the surface with overlapping flat cell bodies. Overlapping between cells (e) was greatly reduced by eight hours and cell began to display (h) spindle morphology. At 24 hours (f) MSCs adhered to cartilage and dissipating membrane stain indicated possible doubling; (i) typical fibroblastic-like MSC morphology and organisation can be observed.
3.5. MSC Dispersion on Cartilage with Increasing Concentration of HA and Viscosity of Media Formulations
Ultra-low adherence 96-well plates were plugged with cartilage discs and MSCs were seeded, suspended in either control or HA media (0.5–5 mg/mL HA). At lower concentrations of HA, MSCs uniformly dispersed across the cartilage surface. As concentration increased to 3 mg/mL dispersion was maintained but with reduction in adhered cells. Singular colonies were observed at highest concentrations 4 mg/mL and 5 mg/mL HA (Figure 5).
The flow-rate of the sphere in the falling-ball test was measured to show viscosity of HA media formulations relative to control (see Supplementary Figure 3). The control displayed the highest flow-rate, which decreased with increasing concentrations of HA. The flow-rate for 0.5 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL HA was 57% and 51% of the control, respectively. Flow-rate of 2 mg/mL HA dropped to 20% of control and then a plateau was observed for higher concentrations.
3.6. MSC Adherence and Proliferation on Cartilage
The 1 mg/mL HA formulation was tested for all conditions (Figure 6). Ultra-low adherence 96-well plates were plugged with cartilage discs and cells seeded at either 5 × 103 cells (adherence) or 2 × 103 cells (proliferation) per well. In the adherence experiment, a peak was observed in the primed (+ −) condition (p < 0.05). A similar peak was observed for the primed condition in the proliferation experiment (p = 0.1).
3.7. HA Media Alter the Cytokine Secretion Profile of MSCs
MSCs were treated for three days in either control or HA media formulations. Changes in concentration were observed in 28 of the 48 measured cytokines (see SF 4–7 and Supplementary Table 2). MSCs treated with 1 mg/mL HA increased secretion for Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) (Figure 7). Anti-inflammatory cytokine Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) secretion increased dose-dependently and was significant at 2 mg/mL HA. Interleukin-6 (IL-6), a dual role cytokine, increased in the 0.25 mg/mL HA concentration but then decreased with increasing concentration of HA. Fibroblast growth factor-basic (FGF-β) increased dose-dependently and was significant at 2 mg/mL HA. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) decreased with increasing concentration of HA and was significant at 2 mg/mL HA.
4. Discussion
Biological therapeutics such as MSC therapy are gaining acceptance for the treatment of inflammatory conditions, including musculoskeletal ailments such as knee osteoarthritis (OA). This is most likely due to the well documented treatment gap for middle-age sufferers of OA who are not candidates for total knee arthroplasty [5]. The safety of allogeneic MSC therapy will continue to drive the universal donor model because an “off-the-shelf” therapeutic is desirable for scalability and cost. The manufacture of cell therapeutics for the treatment of OA will likely involve the use of agents that can enhance MSC function. The use of HA is attractive as an adjunct, as it is a core component of the extracellular matrix, endogenously abundant in the knee joint [8, 9] and approved for the treatment of OA. It is important to understand growth kinetics of MSCs with respect to HA. Already there have been case reports [16] and randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled studies [14] where MSCs were suspended in HA either as a vehicle or as a combination for the treatment of OA. These studies did not document any exploration of positive or negative interactions between MSCs and HA [17]. Therefore we tested different concentrations of HA in culture media to assess adherence and early proliferation kinetics of MSCs on both plastic culture surfaces and equine articular cartilage explants in an ex vivo model, as a way to simulate early cell behaviour following an intra-articular injection of this combination. Also, we hypothesised that the high viscosity of HA may interfere with cell binding. To avoid this issue, we explored whether MSCs could be primed with HA to improve growth kinetics or adherence. We employed a novel cartilage disc assay in a time series to determine MSC adherence to cartilage. In the same cartilage assay the physical dispersion of MSCs was assessed using a concentration series of HA media over the cartilage shedding light on the biological relevance of the entanglement point of HA chains.
An allogeneic preparation of MSCs and HA may be developed in a number of ways, with HA only present in the final cellular product, used as a priming agent during culture but not in the final formulation or both. Here we tested three representative conditions and found that cells grown in standard culture and seeded in HA (− +) show some increases in adherence and proliferation. However, greater differences were observed in the (+ −) and (+ +) conditions, where HA as a culture supplement exhibited dose-dependent increases in cell number. It is well known that HA molecules behave in solution as highly hydrated randomly kinked coils, which start to entangle at concentrations of less than 1 mg/mL (entanglement point) [18]. The peak seen in the HA dose required for optimal cell attachment is centred on this entanglement point of the HA chains. In this study, for the first time we have attributed biological significance to the physiochemical phenomena of the entanglement point seen in HA chains. At this concentration of HA, all HA molecules are connected via a meshwork and behave like a weak and elastic gel which mimics properties of soft tissue [19].
In contrast to the standard plates, the high-adherence plates decreased the number of adherent cells in the presence of HA and for the HA primed cells. According to the manufacturer, the surface is treated (nonbiologically) to improve cell attachment by incorporating more oxygen into the cell culture surface by increasing surface area and rendering it more hydrophilic. Increasing concentrations of HA decreased the number of attached cells within the first 24 hours significantly. HA is a regulator of water homeostasis in the body [8]; therefore it is reasonable to suggest HA interfered with the treated surface, an interference which persisted in the primed conditions.
The constraint of viscosity made it unclear whether increasing HA concentration further would amplify the effects seen in early time points. Viscosity-induced heterogeneity can be seen in the variance of the ranges observed for the 2 mg/mL HA concentration across all the growth kinetics experiments when cells were seeded in HA. Previous investigations of porcine bone marrow-derived MSCs showed using 4 mg/mL HA (M W 800 KDa) was optimal at 7 days [20] but no changes in two days. It is counterintuitive to expect optimal growth kinetics at 7 days since HA half-life in the knee joint is reported to be less than 24 hours [21].
Our study was concerned with high molecular weight HA, as it is more applicable as an OA therapeutic [22]. The study of low molecular weight HA found no difference in cell adherence or proliferation between 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/mL concentrations in the early time points. Another adhesion study using the same high molecular weight HA also found a decrease in synovial MSC adhesion with increasing concentrations beyond the entanglement point [23]. We employed a modified falling-ball test to show relative changes in viscosity from control media. The biggest change in viscosity was seen at concentrations above the entanglement point, the flow-rate of which decreased by 31% between 1 and 2 mg/mL concentrations and then a plateau. This further explains decreases seen in cell attachment for concentrations higher than 1 mg/mL as a viscosity constraint in the early phase.
Increased attachment and proliferation on culture surfaces enabled the initial experiments to be performed under controlled conditions but may not reflect cartilage binding. We therefore employed a novel equine-derived cartilage explant culture model ex vivo in an attempt to better mimic true architecture of the target tissue in OA, cartilage. Shimaya et al. had shown previously that synovial MSCs will increase adherence to an osteochondral defect with 10 mM magnesium ex vivo [24]. However, inconsistencies can be observed in defects created and further limitations of subjectivity can arise when using an image analysis technique to quantify cell adherence. Baboolal et al. utilised a similar technique with osteochondral plugs embedded in agarose to test MSC adherence to cartilage. However, MSCs were labelled with iron-oxide microparticles and semiquantitative image analysis techniques were used to report cell adhesion [23]. Herein we have described a reproducible, consistent, and quantitative method for cell attachment to biologically inactive cartilage in isolation. This enabled the testing of various cell and HA formulations without any modulatory signalling from the cartilage because it was not viable. Some considerations for our technique revolved around the plug integrity in the well; that is, if the cartilage disc curled and the well no longer sealed, the replicate was discarded. For this reason, all conditions were run using five technical replicates. The use of ultra-low adherence plates and repeated washing limited nonspecific binding of cells to plastic and therefore gave a true indication of cell adherence to the cartilage.
Growth kinetics on the cartilage surface employed the optimal concentration of 1 mg/mL HA for all the conditions on ultra-low adherence plates plugged with the cartilage discs as the new surface. Interestingly, if the cells were seeded in the presence of HA (− + and + +), cell adherence did not improve which suggests the HA may interfere with MSCs binding to cartilage. Only the primed MSCs adhered (p < 0.05) and proliferated (p = 0.1) more than the control. Therefore it is reasonable to expect that the use of HA as a vehicle for MSCs during intra-articular injection for knee OA will interfere with cell attachment to cartilage. Indeed this was consistent with previous investigations, where high molecular weight HA in OA-derived synovial fluid interfered with MSCs binding to cartilage, an effect which could be overcome by hyaluronidase (enzyme used to break down HA) treatment [23]. Furthermore it was shown in a caprine model using a collagen II-induced arthritis that the half-life of HA was an average of 11.5 hours and 20.8 hours in the nonchallenged knees [25].
We showed MSCs substantially adhere after three hours but do not regain fibroblastic morphology until eight hours after seeding. For surgeons injecting allogeneic MSCs into humans, this may indicate the need for an extended unweighted rest period of 8–24 hours after injection to allow MSCs to thoroughly adhere to the cartilage in the joint. Although our model does not take into account the internal pressures of the knee joint, endogenous HA concentration or the catabolic milieu of an OA affected knee. Previous investigations of cell attachment to human arthritic cartilage showed synovial MSCs can adhere within 10 minutes [24]; however the cell dose used was more than 200 times greater per square millimetre of cartilage and lacked washing steps to account for loosely bound cells. In light of this, the model cannot take into account internal shearing forces of the joint which may contribute to cell detachment. Also no effort was made to show morphology of cells was fibroblastic and therefore they may have been in the flat bodied and in the initial attachment phase observed in this study. Furthermore, OA-derived synovial fluid was shown to inhibit MSC binding to cartilage [23]; thus an extended rest period beyond 24 hours may be required for thorough adhesion.
Concentration of HA as a vehicle for intra-articular injection of MSCs is important for dispersion and internal cartilage coverage. The dispersion assay with increasing concentration of HA indicated the higher (4 and 5 mg/mL HA) concentrations would form single aggregate colonies. A randomised, double-blind, controlled study which used intra-articular injection of allogeneic bone marrow-derived MSCs with HA as a vehicle at a concentration of 10 mg/mL showed a reduction in pain in patients with OA changes using a visual analogue scale [14]. However, only some patients had increased meniscal volume, which may be de novo tissue regeneration. According to our dispersion data, it is likely that the injected cell suspension did not disperse throughout the joint. Furthermore, the endogenous concentration of HA found in postmortem synovial fluid was reported at 1–4 mg/mL of HA [26] and this can decrease with joint pathologies as reported by Dahl et al. to 0.17–1.32 mg/mL [27]. It is unclear if the lack of dispersion and therefore close proximity of MSCs would have an effect on tissue regeneration or migration of MSCs in vivo. However, MSCs grown in hanging drop culture as spheroids express higher levels of anti-inflammatory TNF alpha stimulated gene 6 (TSG-6) and stanniocalcin-1 (STC-1) compared to monolayer culture [28] which suggests altered immunomodulatory capacity of MSCs.
Culturing MSCs with HA can alter the cytokine secretion profile. Investigations of the secretome of MSCs when combined with HA have been shown to increase the secretion of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) [29]. MIF secretion by MSCs in this study peaked significantly only for the 1 mg/mL treated cells. MIF is considered to be a proinflammatory mediator especially in OA and acts in local tissue to increase neutrophil and macrophage migration to regions of inflammation. Our previous investigations also showed increased secretion of MIF by MSCs cultured with HA [29]. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) decreased with increasing concentration of HA and significantly for the 2 mg/mL concentration. This was consistent with our previous investigations of HA and MSC coculture [29]. VEGF may play an active role in the pathogenesis of OA. Ludin et al. found that if exogenous VEGF was injected into the knees of mice, the joint presented with synovial hyperplasia and cartilage degradation as typically seen in OA disease [30]. Thus a consistent decrease in the secretion of VEGF by MSCs in the presence of HA may suggest therapeutic synergy between the two.
Basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-β) increased with increasing concentrations of HA. FGF-β is a potent mitogen on MSCs and the increased secretion may help to explain the increase in proliferative capacity of the cells [31, 32]. HA may therefore have an agonistic role in potentiating the secretion of FGF-β by MSCs but this has not been shown. Additionally, an increase in secretion of FGF-β may contribute to increase therapeutic efficacy of MSCs for the treatment of OA. A cartilage defect model in rabbit showed exogenous human FGF-β alone could potentiate articular cartilage resurfacing within 6 weeks of the injury [33].
5. Conclusion
Allogeneic preparations of MSCs will become an increasingly attractive therapeutic in the treatment of knee OA. These preparations are increasingly seen to be tested with HA as a vehicle without consideration for the likely interactions. Here we have shown HA can have profound dose-dependent effects on early growth kinetics of MSC and these effects were founded on the physiochemical phenomena of the HA entanglement point. The use of our ex vivo cartilage model further emphasises the limitation of in vitro experimentation but also highlighted for the first time that HA primed MSCs can increase cell attachment to cartilage and that the presence of HA did not. Our time course study also suggests patients undergoing MSC therapy for knee OA could benefit from being immobilised and unweighted for 8 hours after injection to allow MSCs to thoroughly adhere in the joint. Additionally, concentration of HA was also shown to greatly affect the dispersion of MSCs. These factors should be considered in future trials with respect to the culture media for MSCs and where HA is being considered as a component of vehicle for the treatment of OA.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support received from the Australian Postgraduate Award Scholarship and the higher degree research fund provided by the Department of Chemistry & Biomolecular Sciences, Macquarie University. Some of this work was undertaken at the Australian Proteome Analysis Facility (APAF) at Macquarie University, the infrastructure provided by the Australian Government through the Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (CRIS) program. They also acknowledge the help of Debra Birch and the use of the Microscopy Unit, Faculty of Science at Macquarie University, and Macquarie Engineering & Technical Services for the manufacture of custom designed cartilage sectioning tools.
Conflict of Interests
Benjamin R. Herbert is an Assistant/Professor of Translational Regenerative Medicine at the University of Sydney. He is also a cofounder, shareholder, and consultant to Regeneus Ltd. Peter Succar is a Ph.D. candidate at Macquarie University and a casual employee at Regeneus Ltd. Edmond J. Breen is the Head of Bioinformatics at the Australian Proteome Analysis Facility (APAF) at Macquarie University and a consultant to Regeneus Ltd. Michael Medynskyj is a full time employee at Regeneus Ltd. Tony Batterham is a consultant for Regeneus Ltd. and director of Quirindi Vet Clinic. The Quirindi Vet Clinic and Regeneus Ltd. contributed funds equally to the publication processing fee.
Authors' Contribution
Peter Succar contributed to concept and design, provision of study material, collection and assembly of data, data analysis and interpretation, paper writing, and final approval of the paper. Michael Medynskyj contributed to concept and design and final approval of paper. Edmond J. Breen contributed to data analysis and interpretation and final approval of paper. Tony Batterham contributed to provision of study material. Mark P. Molloy contributed to administrative support and final approval of paper. Benjamin R. Herbert contributed to concept and design, financial support, administrative support, paper writing, and final approval of paper.
References
- 1.Benito M. J., Veale D. J., FitzGerald O., van den Berg W. B., Bresnihan B. Synovial tissue inflammation in early and late osteoarthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2005;64(9):1263–1267. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.025270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Woolf A. D., Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2003;81(9):646–656. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhang W., Moskowitz R. W., Nuki G., et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2008;16(2):137–162. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Raman R., Dutta A., Day N., Sharma H. K., Shaw C. J., Johnson G. V. Efficacy of Hylan G-F 20 and Sodium Hyaluronate in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee—a prospective randomized clinical trial. Knee. 2008;15(4):318–324. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li C. S., Karlsson J., Winemaker M., Sancheti P., Bhandari M. Orthopedic surgeons feel that there is a treatment gap in management of early OA: international survey. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2014;22(2):363–378. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2529-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Caplan A. I., Dennis J. E. Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 2006;98(5):1076–1084. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jo C. H., Lee Y. G., Shin W. H., et al. Intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a proof-of-concept clinical trial. Stem Cells. 2014;32(5):1254–1266. doi: 10.1002/stem.1634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fraser J. R. E., Laurent T. C., Laurent U. B. G. Hyaluronan: its nature, distribution, functions and turnover. Journal of Internal Medicine. 1997;242(1):27–33. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.00170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Balazs E. A., Watson D., Duff I. F., Roseman S. Hyaluronic acid in synovial fluid. I. Molecular parameters of hyaluronic acid in normal and arthritic human fluids. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 1967;10(4):357–376. doi: 10.1002/art.1780100407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sato M., Uchida K., Nakajima H., et al. Direct transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells into the knee joints of Hartley strain guinea pigs with spontaneous osteoarthritis. Arthritis Research and Therapy. 2012;14, article R31 doi: 10.1186/ar3735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lee K. B. L., Hui J. H. P., Song I. C., Ardany L., Lee E. H. Injectable mesenchymal stem cell therapy for large cartilage defects—a porcine model. STEM CELLS. 2007;25(11):2964–2971. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Murphy J. M., Fink D. J., Hunziker E. B., Barry F. P. Stem cell therapy in a caprine model of osteoarthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2003;48(12):3464–3474. doi: 10.1002/art.11365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee K. B. L., Wang V. T. Z., Chan Y. H., Hui J. H. P. A novel, minimally-invasive technique of cartilage repair in the human knee using arthroscopic microfracture and injections of mesenchymal stem cells and hyaluronic acid—a prospective comparative study on safety and short-term efficacy. Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore. 2012;41(11):511–517. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Vangsness C. T., Jr., Farr J., II, Boyd J., Dellaero D. T., Mills C. R., LeRoux-Williams M. Adult human mesenchymal stem cells delivered via intra-articular injection to the knee following partial medial meniscectomy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—American Volume. 2014;96(2):90–98. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.m.00058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Eguchi Y., Karino T. Measurement of rheologic property of blood by a falling-ball blood viscometer. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2008;36(4):545–553. doi: 10.1007/s10439-008-9454-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pak J. Regeneration of human bones in hip osteonecrosis and human cartilage in knee osteoarthritis with autologous adipose-tissue-derived stem cells: a case series. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2011;5, article 296 doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-5-296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhu H., Mitsuhashi N., Klein A., et al. The role of the hyaluronan receptor CD44 in mesenchymal stem cell migration in the extracellular matrix. STEM CELLS. 2006;24(4):928–935. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Laurent T. C., Laurent U. B. G., Fraser J. R. E. The structure and function of hyaluronan: an overview. Immunology and Cell Biology. 1996;74(2):A1–A7. doi: 10.1038/icb.1996.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Scott J. E., Cummings C., Brass A., Chen Y. Secondary and tertiary structures of hyaluronan in aqueous solution, investigated by rotary shadowing-electron microscopy and computer simulation. Hyaluronan is a very efficient network-forming polymer. Biochemical Journal. 1991;274(3):699–705. doi: 10.1042/bj2740699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zou X., Li H., Chen L., Baatrup A., Bünger C., Lind M. Stimulation of porcine bone marrow stromal cells by hyaluronan, dexamethasone and rhBMP-2. Biomaterials. 2004;25(23):5375–5385. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lindenhayn K., Heilmann H.-H., Niederhausen T., Walther H.-U., Pohlenz K. Elimination of tritium-labelled hyaluronic acid from normal and osteoarthritic rabbit knee joints. European Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry. 1997;35(5):355–363. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1997.35.5.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kikuchi T., Yamada H., Shimmei M. Effect of high molecular weight hyaluronan on cartilage degeneration in a rabbit model of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 1996;4(2):99–110. doi: 10.1016/S1063-4584(05)80319-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Baboolal T. G., Mastbergen S. C., Jones E., Calder S. J., Lafeber F. P. J. G., McGonagle D. Synovial fluid hyaluronan mediates MSC attachment to cartilage, a potential novel mechanism contributing to cartilage repair in osteoarthritis using knee joint distraction. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2015 doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shimaya M., Muneta T., Ichinose S., Tsuji K., Sekiya I. Magnesium enhances adherence and cartilage formation of synovial mesenchymal stem cells through integrins. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2010;18(10):1300–1309. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fraser J. R. E., Kimpton W. G., Pierscionek B. K., Cahill R. N. P. The kinetics of hyaluronan in normal and acutely inflamed synovial joints: observations with experimental arthritis in sheep. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1993;22(6):9–17. doi: 10.1016/s0049-0172(10)80015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hamerman D., Schuster H. Hyaluronate in normal human synovial fluid. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1958;37(1):57–64. doi: 10.1172/jci103585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dahl L. B., Dahl I. M. S., Engstrom-Laurent A., Granath K. Concentration and molecular weight of sodium hyaluronate in synovial fluid from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other arthropathies. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 1985;44(12):817–822. doi: 10.1136/ard.44.12.817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bartosh T. J., Ylöstalo J. H., Mohammadipoor A., et al. Aggregation of human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) into 3D spheroids enhances their antiinflammatory properties. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107(31):13724–13729. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008117107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Succar P., Breen E. J., Kuah D., Herbert B. R. Alterations in the secretome of clinically relevant preparations of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells cocultured with hyaluronan. Stem Cells International. 2015;2015:16. doi: 10.1155/2015/421253.421253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ludin A., Sela J. J., Schroeder A., Samuni Y., Nitzan D. W., Amir G. Injection of vascular endothelial growth factor into knee joints induces osteoarthritis in mice. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2013;21(3):491–497. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Walsh D. A., Mcwilliams D. F., Turley M. J., et al. Angiogenesis and nerve growth factor at the osteochondral junction in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Rheumatology. 2010;49(10):1852–1861. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Coutu D. L., Galipeau J. Roles of FGF signaling in stem cell self-renewal, senescence and aging. Aging. 2011;3(10):920–933. doi: 10.18632/aging.100369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fujimoto E., Ochi M., Kato Y., Mochizuki Y., Sumen Y., Ikuta Y. Beneficial effect of basic fibroblast growth factor on the repair of full-thickness defects in rabbit articular cartilage. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 1999;119(3-4):139–145. doi: 10.1007/s004020050377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.