Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 9;6(36):38934–38951. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5380

Table 2. Comparison of microarray gene expression profiling and real-time RT-PCR for six selected genes.

Genes Fold change
Shikonin Isobutyrylshikonin β,β-Dimethylacrylshikonin Isovalerylshikonin 2-Methylbutyrylshikonin
Microarray RT-PCR Microarray RT-PCR Microarray RT-PCR Microarray RT-PCR Microarray RT-PCR
JUN 5.8 30.67 7.1 160.45 5.1 19.37 7.7 37.24 4.7 32.05
GABARAPL1 5.4 78.16 5.2 78.14 4.1 56.77 4.5 96.57 4.3 112.43
LY96 9 69.84 12.4 161.44 9.8 49.32 4.7 93.54 11.2 103.92
IFITM2 −3.5 −1.05 −4.2 −1.31 −3.8 −1.59 −5.1 −1.27 −3.2 −1.32
MYC −5.4 −2.37 −10.3 −2.30 −10.4 −5.97 −9.9 −5.26 −8.3 −2.20
MS4AS −3.6 −1.72 −7.0 −2.62 −6.8 −10.03 −5.3 −4.63 −8.3 –1.24
R-value 0.9011 0.9386 0.8662 0.7954 0.8480

The correlation coefficient (R-value) between mRNA expression values determined by microarray hybridization and real-time RT-PCR were caculated with Pearson correlation test