Skip to main content
Bulletin of Emergency & Trauma logoLink to Bulletin of Emergency & Trauma
. 2015 Apr;3(2):37–40.

Tube Thoracostomy (Chest Tube) Removal in Traumatic Patients: What Do We Know? What Can We Do?

Shahram Paydar 1,*, Zahra Ghahramani 1, Hamed Ghoddusi Johari 1, Samad Khezri 1, Bizhan Ziaeian 2, Mohammad Ali Ghayyoumi 3, Mohammad Javad Fallahi 3, Mohammad Hadi Niakan 1, Golnar Sabetian 4, Hamid Reza Abbasi 1, Shahram Bolandparvaz 1
PMCID: PMC4771264  PMID: 27162900

Abstract

Chest tube (CT) or tube thoracostomy placement is often indicated following traumatic injuries. Premature movement of the chest tube leads to increased hospital complications and costs for patients. Placement of a chest tube is indicated in drainage of blood, bile, pus, drain air, and other fluids. Although there is a general agreement for the placement of a chest tube, there is little consensus on the subsequent management. Chest tube removal in trauma patients increases morbidity and hospital expense if not done at the right time. A review of relevant literature showed that the best answers to some questions about time and decision-making have been long sought. Issues discussed in this manuscript include chest tube removal conditions, the need for chest radiography before and after chest tuberemoval, the need to clamp the chest tube prior to removal, and drainage rate and acceptability prior to removal.

Key Words: Tube Thoracostomy Removal, Chest Tube, CT, Traumatic patients

Introduction

Tube thorascotomy   is often indicated for pneumothorax, hemothorax, or plural effusion following a traumatic injury.  Chest  tube management  should be individualized  according to whether the patient is mechanically  ventilated and whether or not the patient has had pulmonary resection.This  guideline  is designed  to decrease pain  and  discomfort  in  trauma  patients,  reduce tube thoracostomy removal complications, decrease average length of hospital stay and hospital costs, reduce hospital patient and staff traffic, reduce the radiation dose for patients who are exposed, reduce the likelihood of medical staff errors, and help staff in decision-making.

Complications of Chest tube Placement

Inserting a chest tube could be lifesaving,  but the most significant complication that arises afterward  is recurrent  pneumothorax  [1], which results in increased length of hospital stay, patient morbidity, and economical liability. Therefore, the optimal method of chest tube removal should be determined. Important factors in determining chest tube complications include urgency in placement, location of chest tube placement, and level of staff experience.

Questions to be Addressed

First question: What criteria should patients with tube thoracostomy meet to be a candidate for tube removal?

There is no double-blind  clinical trial or meta- analysis regarding characteristics necessary for a tube thoracostomy removal, but almost all experts agree with those found in references  books and hospital guidelines and listed below:

- Stable clinical condition

- Wide-open lung in X-ray of the tube thoracostomy

- Discharge of less than 200 cc in twenty-four hours

- No air leak

As regards  the history  of air leak, there is no direct  evidence  relating  decision  to remove  the tube thoracostomy, but almost all references and hospital guidelines have focused on and confirmed the necessity of having no air leak from the tube thoracostomy for at least twenty-four hours before removing the tube [2-4]. According to some experts, it is necessary for at least 48 hours to have passed, especially in patients receiving artificial respiration. Studies have shown that the incidence of conditions requiring placement of a chest tube will rise when it is inserted before 48 hours of stability in patients with respiratory conditions [5,6].

Second question: Is chest radiography necessary before deciding to remove the chest tube?

All resources confirmed the necessity of ensuring the openness of the lungs before chest tube removal. Many thoracic surgeons request an x-ray after chest tube insertion to ensure tube thoracostomy patency and lungs; if respiratory conditions and an examination of the individual had good results, the chest X-ray would not be repeated before removing the tube [7,8]. A number of authoritative guidelines also dictate getting a chest X-ray, but have limited it to the unreliability of the absence of open lungs, saying: Open the lung with the absence of negative pressure on the chest tube in cases where the patient’s level of consciousness is not appropriate, or when the patient has significant air leakage after the initial picture of the tube thoracostomy [9-13].

Third question: Is it necessary to clamp the chest tube prior to removal?

Studies in this area can be divided into three parts, all of which belong to level III:

a. Viewpoints of thoracic surgeons of thoracostomy

and lung resections in patients with a chest tube,

b. Studies of patient management or spontaneous pneumothorax, and

c. Studies of trauma injury management.

More studies belong to the first two groups [1,14-16]. These studies have shown that if the lung is wide open,  there  is no air leak and respiratory conditions are acceptable, which do not contribute to the decision to remove the tube thoracostomy. In traumatic patients, however, there is much evidence of level III, and there are more guidelines for hospitals among which there is no consensus [17,18]. According to the ideas and comments of experts, if the patient is receiving artificial respiration, has had a history of severe air leak, or has slight air leakage, clamping is recommended  prior to removing the chest tube [19].

Recommendations

Note that the clamp does not impose a fee or radiation to the patients or the system. In the vast majority of trauma victims, thoracostomies were not performed and the status of the visceral and peripheral areas of the lung injury was not known. Therefore, clamping six hours before removing the tube and clinically monitoring  the  patient  is recommended.  In the case of high-risk patients, including patients under ventilation, with a history of excessive air leakage, and patients with a decreased level of consciousness or  further  unreliable  examination,  radiography before removing the tube and at least 6 hours after clamping it is recommended.

Forth  question:  How  much  fluid drainage  from the  tube  thoracostomy  in  twenty-four  hours  is acceptable? Is it different with regard to the type of drainage (serousanginios fluid, blood, or pus)?

No high-level study has been performed on this issue, and there is only type III evidence in this field. However, after thoracoscopic lung resections, daily drainage up to even 400 cc is acceptable for removing the chest tube, because there is damage to the chest wall, lungs, and pleural. It seems that the numerical majority of pulmonologists agree on a daily discharge of 200 cc, especially if the exact extent of the lesion is unknown [19-21]. The liquid output is also important, but if it is not pus-like, the patient’s condition should be treated as an empyema.

Recommendation

When the amount of daily tube drainage is less than 200cc and is not pus-like, the chest tube can be removed. Pussy drainage from the chest tube requires empyema management.

Fifth question: Does the primary reason for chest tube insertion have any effect on decision-making about clamping the tube before removal?

No study or opinion was found regarding this point, and the primary  reason for chest tube insertion seems to have no importance in deciding upon tube removal.  Observation  of the mentioned  rules is adequate for decision-making.

Sixth question: Is it necessary to have radiography after removing the chest tube?

In many centers, a routine chest radiograph is taken after chest tube removal. Studies have shown that in cases of reinsertion of a chest tube after removal, all patients were completelysymptomatic.The chest radiography  of asymptomatic  patients who were indicative  pneumothorax  has been administered without leaving a chest tube [22-24].

Recommendation

Although no useful studies have shown that radiography is necessary after tube thoracostomy removal [22-24], it is recommended for some patients: patients who are receiving artificial respiration and chest tubes are removed, patients who have no access to surgical services and have tube thoracostomy removal,  and patients  with a decreased  level of consciousness or unreliable tests. The proposed time for radiography is at least 3 hours after tube removal.

Seventh question: Can we remove the chest tube of patients who are under mechanical respiration?

A significant number of experts believe that keeping a chest tube in patients under mechanical ventilation until they are interrupted is best [25-31], but most studies have shown that long-term indwelling of a chest tube could increase a patient’s chances of empyema  and related  respiratory  complications resulting from pain [32,33]. Therefore, some centers determine special conditions for chest tube removal in these patients. In a study done in this center, it was shown that doctors would remove a chest tube a minimum of 5-7 days after its insertion in patients who were under mechanical respiration and had met the conditions for chest tube removal [34-41]. The complication rate of the chest tube control group showed no difference after removing the ventilator from patients.

Recommendation

When a patient is under artificial respiration and meets the conditions for removal of the chest tube, the tube can be removed 5-7 days after insertion while fully observing precautions. In other words, the tube will be removable after a chest X-ray is taken and an open chest is ensured.

Discussion

It is necessary to have no tube air leak for at least 24 hours before removing the chest tube [2,4]. In patients with respiratory conditions, chest tube placement will rise when inserted 48 hours of stability [5,6]. Some studies have shown to do x-rays after chest tube insertion [7,8]. Chest tube clamping is recommended prior to removal if the patient receiving artificial respiration and has a history of severe air leak [19]. Clamping is not imposing radiation to the patients and is recommended to clamp six hours before removing the chest tube.

In regards of fluid drainage from the tube thoracostomy, daily drainage up to 400cc is acceptable for removing the chest tube [9-21]. When the amount of daily drainage is less than 200cc, chest tube can be removed.

It is recommended to do radiography after tube thoracostomy  for the patients who are receiving artificial respiration and have no access to surgical services, although there is no study showing that the radiography is necessary [22-24].

The number of experts believes that keeping a chest tube is the best in the patients who are under mechanical respiration [25-31]. We believe that the tube can be removed 5-7 days after chest x-rays and tube insertion.

Therefore, we recommend clamping patients between 6 to 24 hours before removing the chest tube. In such cases, 6 hours for alert patients and 24 hours for unconscious patients are recommended. Moreover, after removal of the chest tube, X-rays must be taken within 3 hours to confirm patency.

Conflict of interest: None declared.

References

  • 1.Etoch SW, Bar-Natan MF, Miller FB, Richardson JD. Tube thoracostomy. Factors related to complications. Arch Surg. 1995;130(5):521–5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430050071012. discussion 5-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cerfolio RJ, Minnich DJ, Bryant AS. The removal of chest tubes despite an air leak or a pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(6):1690–4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.01.077. discussion 4-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schoenenberger RA, Haefeli WE, Weiss P, Ritz R. Evaluation of conventional chest tube therapy for iatrogenic pneumothorax. Chest. 1993;104(6):1770–2. doi: 10.1378/chest.104.6.1770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.So SY, Yu DY. Catheter drainage of spontaneous pneumothorax: suction or no suction, early or late removal. Thorax. 1982;37(1):46–8. doi: 10.1136/thx.37.1.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Martin M, Schall CT, Anderson C, Kopari N, Davis AT, Stevens P, et al. Results of a clinical practice algorithm for the management of thoracostomy tubes placed for traumatic mechanism. Springerplus. 2013;2:642. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Muslim M, Bilal A, Salim M, Khan MA, Baseer A, Ahmed M. Tube thorocostomy: management and outcome in patients with penetrating chest trauma. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008;20(4):108–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Palesty JA, McKelvey AA, Dudrick SJ. The efficacy of X-rays after chest tube removal. Am J Surg. 2000;179(1):13–6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00260-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Andrivet P, Djedaini K, Teboul J-L, Brochard L, Dreyfuss D. Spontaneous pneumothorax comparison of thoracic drainage vs immediate or delayed needle aspiration. CHEST Journal. 1995;108(2):335–9. doi: 10.1378/chest.108.2.335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schoenenberger RA, Haefeli WE, Weiss P, Ritz RF. Timing of invasive procedures in therapy for primary and secondary spontaneous pneumothorax. Arch Surg. 1991;126(6):764–6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410300110017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Weissberg D, Refaely Y. Pneumothorax: experience with 1,199 patients. Chest. 2000;117(5):1279–85. doi: 10.1378/chest.117.5.1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Baumann MH, Strange C. Treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax: a more aggressive approach. Chest. . 1997;112(3):789–804. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.3.789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Light RW. Pleural diseases. 3rded. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995. pp. 242–277. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Baumann MH, Strange C. The clinician's perspective on pneumothorax management. Chest. 1997;112(3):822–8. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.3.822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Belcher JR, Sturridge MF. Thoracic surgical management. 4thed. London, UK: Bailliere Tindall; 1972. pp. 154–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.vonHippel A. A manual of thoracic surgery. Illinoy: Thomas, Springfield; 1978. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hatz RA, Kaps MF, Meimarakis G, Loehe F, Muller C, Furst H. Long-term results after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for first-time and recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70(1):253–7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01411-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gregoire J, Deslauriers J. Closed drainage and suction systems. In: Pearson FG, Deslauriers J, Ginsberg RJ., editors. Thoracic surgery. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1995. 1126 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Martin T, Fontana G, Olak J, Ferguson M. Use of pleural catheter for the management of simple pneumothorax. Chest. 1996;110(5):1169–72. doi: 10.1378/chest.110.5.1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Utter GH. The rate of pleural fluid drainage as a criterion for the timing of chest tube removal: theoretical and practical considerations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(6):2262–7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hessami MA, Najafi F, Hatami S. Volume threshold for chest tube removal: a randomized controlled trial. J Inj Violence Res. 2009;1(1):33–6. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v1i1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Younes RN, Gross JL, Aguiar S, Haddad FJ, Deheinzelin D. When to remove a chest tube? A randomized study with subsequent prospective consecutive validation. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195(5):658–62. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01332-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Whitehouse MR, Patel A, Morgan JA. The necessity of routine post-thoracostomy tube chest radiographs in post-operative thoracic surgery patients. Surgeon. 2009;7(2):79–81. doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(09)80020-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Palesty JA, McKelvey AA, Dudrick SJ. The efficacy of X-rays after chest tube removal. Am J Surg. 2000;179(1):13–6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00260-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pacharn P, Heller DN, Kammen BF, Bryce TJ, Reddy MV, Bailey RA, et al. Are chest radiographs routinely necessary following thoracostomy tube removal? Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32(2):138–42. doi: 10.1007/s00247-001-0591-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hoyt DB, Coimbra R, Potenza B. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. 17. In: Townsend JR, editor. Management of Acute Trauma. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2004. pp. 483–532. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Al-Koudmani I, Darwish B, Al-Kateb K, Taifour Y. Chest trauma experience over eleven-year period at al-mouassat university teaching hospital-Damascus: a retrospective review of 888 cases. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;(7):35. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-7-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Demirhan R, Onan B, Oz K, Halezeroglu S. Comprehensive analysis of 4205 patients with chest trauma: a 10-year experience. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;9(3):450–3. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.206599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Luketich JD, Sugarbaker D. Chest wall and pleura. Sabiston textbook of surgery. New York: McGrawhill; 2004. 1723 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.O'Connor JV, Adamski J. The diagnosis and treatment of non-cardiac thoracic trauma. J R Army Med Corps. 2010;156(1):5–14. doi: 10.1136/jramc-156-01-02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Abbasi HR, Farrokhnia F, Sefidbakht S, Paydar S, Bolandparvaz S. Chest Tube Removal Time in Trauma Patients on Positive Ventilation Pressure: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2013;1(1):17–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Abramov D, Yeshayahu M, Tsodikov V, Gatot I, Orman S, Gavriel A, et al. Timing of chest tube removal after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Card Surg. 2005;20(2):142–6. doi: 10.1111/j.0886-0440.2005.200347.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Menger R, Telford G, Kim P, Bergey MR, Foreman J, Sarani B, et al. Complications following thoracic trauma managed with tube thoracostomy. Injury. 2012;43(1):46–50. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Aguilar MM, Battistella FD, Owings JT, Su T. Posttraumatic empyema. Risk factor analysis. Arch Surg. 1997;132(6):647–50. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430300089018. discussion 50-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Younes RN, Gross JL, Aguiar S, Haddad FJ, Deheinzelin D. When to remove a chest tube? A randomized study with subsequent prospective consecutive validation. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195(5):658–62. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01332-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Robinson CF, Lynn-McHale DJ, Carlson KK. AACN procedure manual for critical care. 4thed. 2001. Assisting with chest tube replacement; pp. 109–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mirmohammad-Sadeghi M, Etesampour A, Gharipour M, Shariat Z, Nilforoush P, Saeidi M, et al. Early chest tube removal after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. N Am J Med Sci. 2009;1(7):333–7. doi: 10.4297/najms.2009.7333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tawil I, Gonda JM, King RD, Marinaro JL, Crandall CS. Impact of positive pressure ventilation on thoracostomy tube removal. J Trauma. 2010;68(4):818–21. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a5973c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mefire AC, Pagbe JJ, Fokou M, Nguimbous JF, Guifo ML, Bahebeck J. Analysis of epidemiology, lesions, treatment and outcome of 354 consecutive cases of blunt and penetrating trauma to the chest in an African setting. S Afr J Surg. 2010;48(3):90–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Demirhan R, Kucuk HF, Kargi AB, Altintas M, Kurt N, Gulmen M. Evaluation of 572 cases of blunt and penetrating thoracic trauma. Ulus Travma Derg. 2001;7(4):231–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Segers P, Van Schil P, Jorens P, Van Den Brande F. Thoracic trauma: an analysis of 187 patients. Acta Chir Belg. 2001;101(6):277–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Martino K, Merrit S, Boyakye K, Sernas T, Koller C, Hauser CJ, et al. Prospective randomized trial of thoracostomy removal algorithms. J Trauma. 1999;46(3):369–71. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199903000-00003. discussion 72-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of Emergency & Trauma are provided here courtesy of Trauma Research Center of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES