Skip to main content
Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde logoLink to Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde
. 2016 Feb;76(2):176–181. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1558239

Endometriosis-associated Malignancy

Endometriose-assoziierte Malignome

N Krawczyk 1,, M Banys-Paluchowski 1,4, D Schmidt 2, U Ulrich 3, T Fehm 1
PMCID: PMC4771509  PMID: 26941451

Abstract

Endometriosis is a common condition in women of reproductive age. According to several epidemiological studies endometriosis may be associated with increased risk of various malignancies. However, endometriosis-associated malignancy (EAM) is defined by certain histological criteria. About 80 % of EAM have been found in the ovary, whereas 20 % are localized in extragonadal sites like intestine, rectovaginal septum, abdominal wall, pleura and others. Some authors suggest that EAM arise from atypical endometriosis as an intermediate lesion between endometriosis and cancer. Moreover, a number of genetic alterations, like loss of heterozygosity (LOH), PTEN, ARID1 A and p53 mutations have been found in both endometriosis and EAM. Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) is mostly a well or intermediately differentiated tumor of endometrioid or clear cell histological sub-type. Women affected by EAOC are on average five to ten years younger than non-EAOC patients; in most of the cases EAOC is a low stage disease with favorable clinical outcome. Since EAM is a rare condition systematic data on EAM are still missing. A systematic retrospective study on endometriosis-associated malignancies (EAM study) is currently being conducted by the Endometriosis Research Foundation together with the study groups on ovarian and uterine tumors of the working group for gynecological oncology (AGO) (gyn@mlk-berlin.de).

Key words: endometriosis, ovarian cancer, endometriosis-associated malignancy, atypical endometriosis, malignant transformation


Abbreviations

CCC

Clear cell carcinoma

DFS

Disease-free survival

EAM

Endometriosis-associated malignancy

EAOC

Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer

HR

Hazard ratio

LOH

Loss of heterozygosity

OC

Ovarian cancer

OR

Odds ratio

OS

Overall survival

PTEN

Phosphatase and tensin homolog

RR

Relative risk

SIR

Standardized incidence ratio

Introduction

Endometriosis is a common condition in women in which endometrium-like tissue is detected outside the uterine cavity 1. The incidence of the disease in females of reproductive age is estimated at 5 to 15 % 2; the main symptoms are dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain and infertility 3. Despite extensive research in this field, the exact pathogenesis of endometriosis remains not fully understood but one widely accepted hypothesis is the implantation of endometrial tissue in the peritoneal cavity due to retrograde menstruation 4. Although endometriosis is considered a benign condition, it has been demonstrated to share some characteristics with malignant tumors such as tissue invasion and damage, neoangiogenesis or spread to distant organs 5. Current knowledge about endometriosis-associated malignancies will be presented in this review.

Endometriosis and Cancer Risk – Epidemiological Data

According to several epidemiological studies endometriosis is associated with increased risk of various malignancies with the best evidence for ovarian cancer 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18. Furthermore, a number of cohort and case control studies demonstrated an epidemiological association of endometriosis with endometrial cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and others 8, 19, 20. The clinical significance of the association between endometriosis and non-gynecologic malignancies is poorly understood 21.

The majority of the published studies on endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer have reported that ovarian cancer (OC) risk among endometriosis patients is moderately increased (RR, SIR or OR 1.32–1.92) (Table 1). The strongest association between OC and endometriosis was reported by Brinton et al. (SIR = 2.48) 8, Stewart et al. 22 (HR = 2.33) and Buis et al. 23 (HR = 12.4); interestingly, these three studies included only women suffering from infertility, which may be a potential confounding factor for their results. Moreover, a remarkably high increase of ovarian cancer risk (SIR = 8.95) has been demonstrated by Kobayashi et al. 24. In their retrospective cohort study ovarian cancer risk was analysed in women with sonographically diagnosed endometriomas based on time periods from first diagnosis of endometrioma to first diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Since endometriomas were histologically confirmed in only one-third of the cases, whereas the majority of diagnoses was made based on ultrasound image, the ovarian cancer risk has been possibly overestimated in this analysis: some of ovarian cysts identified as endometriomas might have been in fact ovarian cancers. In summary, there are a number of epidemiological studies, in which at least a modest association between endometriosis and ovarian cancer has been consistently demonstrated. Despite epidemiological evidence, a direct causal association between endometriosis and ovarian cancer has not been elucidated so far 25.

Table 1 Epidemiological studies on association between endometriosis and ovarian cancer.

Author Type of study Number of endometriosis cases Number of cancer cases Number of controls OR, SIR, HR or RR (95 % CI)
CG: control group, RR: relative risk, OR: odds ratio, HR: hazard ratio, SIR: standardized incidence ratio
Brinton 1997 8 cohort 20 686 29 1.92 (1.3–2.8)
Ness 2000 10 case control 66 (85 CG) 767 1 367 1.7 (1.2–2.4)
Ness 2002 11 case control 51 (39 CG) 5 207 7 705 1.73 (1.10–2.71)
Olson 2002 12 cohort 1 392 3 0.78 (0.25–2.44)
Brinton 2004 13 cohort 12 193 45 2.48 (1.3–4.2)
Borgfeldt and Andolf 2004 14 nested case control 28 163 81 84 489 1.34 (1.03–1.75)
Modugno 2004 15 case control 177 (184 CG) 2 098 2 953 1.32 (1.06–1.65)
Melin 2006 16 cohort 64 992 122 1.43 (1.19–1.71)
Melin 2007 17 cohort 63 630 134 1.37 (1.14–1.62)
Kobayashi 2007 24 cohort 6 398 46 8.95 (4.12–15.3)
Pearce 2012 18 case control 738 (818 CG) 7 911 13 226 1.49 (1.24–1.65)
Stewart 2012 22 cohort 2 978 38 2.33 (1.02–5.35)
Buis 2013 23 cohort 3 657 34 12.4 (2.8–54.2)
Kok 2015 20 cohort 2 266 13 4.56 (1.72–12.11)

Histological Findings

The histological link between endometriosis and cancer has first been postulated as early as 1925 26. Sampson et al., based on microscopic observations, speculated that endometrial ovarian cancer may develop from endometriotic tissue and described the criteria for diagnosis of endometriosis-associated OC: (1) evidence of endometriosis close to the tumor, (2) exclusion of invasion from other sources, (3) presence of tissue resembling endometrial stoma surrounding characteristic epithelial glands 26. Scott et al., in their analysis from 1953, added a fourth criterion: (4) histological proof of transition from benign changes in endometriosis to malignant changes in cancer 27; all four criteria are still in use to define an endometriosis-associated malignancy (EAM).

About 80 % of EAMs are localized in the ovary, whereas extragonadal sites are affected in one-fourth to one-fifth of all cases 9, 28. In two large reviews of endometriosis-related neoplasms (222 and 205 cases, respectively), extragonadal tumors were reported in 21–24 % of women 29, 30. Since the malignant transformation can take place in every site affected by endometriosis, extragonadal EAMs can be found in the lower pelvis, gastrointestinal tract, abdominal wall, umbilicus, pleura and others 31. The most common localisations of extragonadal EAMs are the rectosigmoid, colon, rectovaginal septum and pelvic peritoneum; these sites are commonly involved by deep infiltrating endometriosis 31.

Based on histopathology and molecular features, ovarian cancers are divided into five main categories: high-grade serous, endometrioid, clear cell, mucinous, and low-grade serous carcinomas 32. The most common subtype is the high-grade serous cancer (70 %), followed by the endometrioid (10 %) and clear cell (10 %) type. Endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas usually present as low-stage disease; the former is typically well differentiated 33. Endometriosis-associated malignancies are most commonly cancers of these two histologic subtypes, rarely other ovarian malignancy types like borderline tumors, endometrial stromal sarcoma or adenosarcoma 18, 25, 28, 31. Recently published pooled analysis of case-controlled studies by Pearce et al. reported an increased risk for low-grade serous ovarian cancer among endometriosis patients as well (RR 2.11; 95 % CI 1.39–3.20, p < 0.0001) 18. No association between endometriosis and high-grade serous ovarian cancer or mucinous ovarian cancer has been reported to date 18, 28.

Theories of Pathogenesis

There are two main theories which attempt to explain the origin of endometriosis-associated malignancies. According to a number of histopathological studies endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) may arise from atypical endometriosis of the ovary 34, 35. This heterogeneous condition is histologically characterized by hyperplasia of endometrial glands with cytological atypia or presence of atypical hobnail cells within ovarian endometriosis 25, 36, 37. A direct association between atypical endometriosis and ovarian cancer was first demonstrated by La Grenade and Silverberg in 1988 34; in five cases of ovarian cancer (three clear cell carcinomas and two endometrioid carcinomas) accompanying atypical endometriosis was found in the ovary and in four out of five cases atypical changes were in contiguity with ovarian neoplasm 34. Furthermore, a significantly higher rate of cytological atypia within endometriotic lesion was demonstrated in cases of EAOC compared with endometriosis alone 38. Although the hypothesis that atypical endometriosis may be a premalignant condition is supported by the fact that it can be detected in up to 80 % of EAOC, there are still not enough data proving this model 35, 39, 40.

According to the other theory endometriosis is not a real precancerous lesion, but there is an indirect link involving common environmental, histological, immunological and genetic factors. Several studies have demonstrated that microenvironment of endometriosis and EAOC share similar mediators and cytokines 40, 41. Whether EAM arise by malignant transformation of endometriotic cells through intermediary lesions (atypical endometriosis) or similarity of microenviroment represents a link between these both entities has not been definitely understood 40, 42.

Genetic Alterations

In the last two decades, evidence has been accumulated that endometriosis-associated malignancies may arise within ovarian endometriosis. Possibly, periodic hemorrhage in ovarian endometriomas may lead to iron-triggered oxidative stress and thus induce genetic alterations. Yamaguchi et al. reported that the concentration of free iron in endometriotic cysts was over one hundred times higher than that in nonendometriotic cysts; the level of oxidative stress related markers, such as lactose dehydrogenase, and antioxidants was higher as well 43.

Accumulation of mutations in tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes is a crucial step during tumor development. Interestingly, numerous mutations in genes linked to carcinogenesis have been identified in endometriotic lesions 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52. Several studies have reported genetic aberrations in tumor suppression genes, such as p53 and PTEN, in endometriosis specimens 53, 54, 55. Inactivation of DNA mismatch repair genes through hypermethylation has been observed in endometriotic tissue as well 53. Furthermore, genetic alterations associated with tumorigenesis are encountered more frequently in benign endometriosis samples from patients with synchronous ovarian cancer than in tumor-free patients who were diagnosed with endometriosis alone. Prowse et al. performed microsatellite analysis in ten patients with ovarian cancer and coexisting endometriosis; the tumor and endometriosis samples were analysed for common molecular genetic alterations 56. 63 events of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) were detected in cancer specimens; one-third of these was also identified in the corresponding endometriosis samples, suggesting that endometriosis might be a clonal precursor to a subtype of ovarian cancer. Hypothetically, endometriosis-associated and endometriosis-independent ovarian cancer may develop through different molecular pathways with distinct genetic alterations (Table 2).

Table 2 Genetic alterations associated with endometriosis and endometriosis-related malignancies.

Factor Genetic alteration Current data
Oxidative stress 8-OHdG 8-Oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine is a marker of oxidative DNA damage. Endometriosis-related ovarian cancer show significantly stronger staining of 8-OHdG than ovarian cancers not accompanied by endometriosis 43. Endometriotic cysts and atypical endometriosis also stain positive for this marker. 8-OHdG seems to play a role in pathogenesis of ovarian cancer and was linked to poor prognosis 44.
Tumor suppressor genes PTEN Phosphatase and tensin homolog is mutated in many cancer entities, particularly in endometrial and endometrioid ovarian cancer; its inactivation occurs early during tumorigenesis 53. PTEN somatic mutations are frequently found in endometriotic cysts 45.
p53 As a negative cell-cycle regulator, p53 is involved in tumorigenesis of different malignancies. Several studies showed no expression in benign endometriosis but high expression in benign endometriotic lesions next to the endometrioid or clear cell carcinoma 54.
ARID1A ARID1A mutations are significantly more common in two ovarian cancer subtypes associated with endometriosis (clear-cell and endometrioid). In case of endometriosis synchronous with ovarian cancer, mutation was more frequent in clones derived from endometriosis samples directly adjacent of the tumor than in those from distant endometriotic lesions 46.
DNA repair hMLH1 hMLH1 corrects errors in DNA replication; hypermethylation of its promoter occurs early in endometrial malignant transformation and can be identified in 10 % of typical and in 33 % of atypical endometrial hyperplasias 47. Abnormal methylation can be observed in endometriosis as well 53.
Oncogene Bcl-2 Expression of this anti-apoptotic protein is significantly higher in endometriosis accompanying cancer (42–73 %) than in benign endometriosis (23 %) 54, suggesting its role in the early steps of tumorigenesis.
KRAS KRAS mutations are significantly more common in endometriosis-associated endometrioid adenocarcinomas (29 %) than in tumors not associated with endometriosis (3 %) 48.
Chromosomic aberrations Aneuploidy Aneuploidic frequency seems higher in endometriosis specimen from patients with advanced endometriosis when compared to the background frequency observed in normal specimens, particularly with regard to chromosome 17, on which tumor suppressor gene p53 is located 49, 50.
Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) A trend of increasing LOH frequencies has been described between solitary endometriosis lesions, endometriosis-associated carcinoma and endometrioid ovarian cancer, respectively 51, 52. Common LOH events can be identified in endometriosis synchronous with ovarian cancer 45, 56.

Risk Factors

Several risk factors for EAM in patients with endometriosis have been reported to date. The size of endometrioma as well as postmenopausal status were demonstrated to be independent predictive factors for the development of ovarian cancer among endometriosis patients in the study by Kobayashi et al. 57. In this prospective cohort trial which assessed the risk of ovarian cancer in 6398 women with ovarian endometriomas, tumor size ≥ 9 cm in diameter was shown to be associated with increased OC risk. However, as mentioned before, one of the limitations of this study is that endometriomas were diagnosed mostly by sonography, and therefore some of the larger tumors might in fact have been ovarian cancers 57. Another risk factor for EAM is hyperestrogenism, both endo- and exogenous: in the study by Zanetta et al. obesity as well as therapy with unopposed estrogens after hysterectomy were shown to be a significant risk factor for the development of EAM 58. Similar effects of estrogen were demonstrated by others 40. On the other hand, hormonal contraception, childbearing, tubal ligation or hysterectomy were found to reduce the ovarian cancer risk among patients with endometriosis 15, 59.

Clinical Implications

EAOC is characterized by an early onset of the disease: Aris et al. reported in their retrospective cohort trial that the mean age of women with EAOC was 48.3 ± 10.8, on average 5.5 years lower than in non EAOC patients (p = 0.003) 60. In a retrospective study by Orezzoli et al. patients with endometriosis-associated clear cell cancer (CCC) of the ovary were even 10 years younger compared with those with non-endometriosis-associated CCC (95 % CI 0.6–18 years; p < 0.05) 61.

Interestingly, EAOC is commonly a low-stage and low-grade disease usually without ascites at initial presentation 62, 63. Furthermore, several authors reported that EAOC is associated with significantly better prognosis (DFS and OS) compared with non-EAOC, suggesting that EAOC represents a biologically distinct entity 28, 61, 64, 65. However, these findings have not been confirmed by others: after controlling for stage, age, grade and treatment no difference in overall survival between these two patient groups could be demonstrated 62, 66, 67; thus, better clinical outcome of EAOC might be explained by a high rate of well-differentiated early-stage tumors rather than by an association with endometriosis per se 62, 63, 67.

Based on existing data on incidence and risk factors of EAM, the possibility of malignant transformation should be included in diagnostic considerations for patients with endometriosis 21, especially in postmenopausal women who present a sudden recurrence of symptoms. Because of the malignant potential, endometriosis patients should, if indicated, receive a combined estrogen-progestin therapy (HRT, hormone replacement therapy) or tibolone even after hysterectomy; unopposed estrogens should generally be avoided in these patients 21, 68, 69. Clinicians should be aware of the increased risk of specific subtypes of ovarian carcinoma in endometriosis patients. A modest increase in cancer risk should be discussed with these patients 70. The risk of ovarian cancer is highest in women with endometriosis and primary infertility 13. However, there are currently no diagnostic options to predict the risk of malignant transformation in an individual patient. Future studies should aim at understanding the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon so as to identify patients who are most at risk for developing endometriosis-related malignancy.

Since EAM are mostly low-grade tumors, there is the question of the efficacy of chemotherapy in EAOC patients 29. However, in the study by Davis et al. no difference in response to chemotherapy in EAOC patients compared with controls with papillary serous ovarian cancer has been found 62. Due to the lack of appropriate data postoperative treatment of EAOC follows the standard chemotherapy guidelines for ovarian cancer 71. In case of extragonadal EAM, especially of rectum or rectovaginal septum, however, surgical resection followed by radiotherapy may be the treatment of choice 29, 31, 65.

Several epidemiological studies, case reports and case series on EAM have been published in the literature to date. However, a systematic analysis of a large population of patients with EAM is still missing. Thus, a systematic retrospective study on endometriosis-associated malignancies (EAM study) is currently being conducted by the Endometriosis Research Foundation together with the study groups on ovarian and uterine tumors of the working group for gynecological oncology (AGO). Histopathological second opinion by pathology reference laboratory is the core component of this study (for more information: gyn@mlk-berlin.de).

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest None.

References

  • 1.Vignali M, Infantino M, Matrone R. et al. Endometriosis: novel etiopathogenetic concepts and clinical perspectives. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:665–678. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03233-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sayasneh A, Tsivos D, Crawford R. Endometriosis and ovarian cancer: a systematic review. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:140310. doi: 10.5402/2011/140310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Berkley K J, Rapkin A J, Papka R E. The pains of endometriosis. Science. 2005;308:1587–1589. doi: 10.1126/science.1111445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gazvani R, Templeton A. New considerations for the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;76:117–126. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(01)00577-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Siufi Neto J, Kho R M, Siufi D F. et al. Cellular, histologic, and molecular changes associated with endometriosis and ovarian cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ness R B. Endometriosis and ovarian cancer: thoughts on shared pathophysiology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:280–294. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vercellini P, Parazzini F, Bolis G. et al. Endometriosis and ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:181–182. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90159-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brinton L A, Gridley G, Persson I. et al. Cancer risk after a hospital discharge diagnosis of endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176:572–579. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70550-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Heidemann L N, Hartwell D, Heidemann C H. et al. The relation between endometriosis and ovarian cancer – a review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93:20–31. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ness R B, Grisso J A, Cottreau C. et al. Factors related to inflammation of the ovarian epithelium and risk of ovarian cancer. Epidemiology. 2000;11:111–117. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200003000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ness R B, Cramer D W, Goodman M T. et al. Infertility, fertility drugs, and ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:217–224. doi: 10.1093/aje/155.3.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Olson J E, Cerhan J R, Janney C A. et al. Postmenopausal cancer risk after self-reported endometriosis diagnosis in the Iowa Womenʼs Health Study. Cancer. 2002;94:1612–1618. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brinton L A, Lamb E J, Moghissi K S. et al. Ovarian cancer risk associated with varying causes of infertility. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:405–414. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.02.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Borgfeldt C, Andolf E. Cancer risk after hospital discharge diagnosis of benign ovarian cysts and endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83:395–400. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00305.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Modugno F, Ness R B, Allen G O. et al. Oral contraceptive use, reproductive history, and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women with and without endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:733–740. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Melin A, Sparen P, Persson I. et al. Endometriosis and the risk of cancer with special emphasis on ovarian cancer. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1237–1242. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Melin A, Sparen P, Bergqvist A. The risk of cancer and the role of parity among women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:3021–3026. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pearce C L, Templeman C, Rossing M A. et al. Association between endometriosis and risk of histological subtypes of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:385–394. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70404-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Munksgaard P S, Blaakaer J. The association between endometriosis and ovarian cancer: a review of histological, genetic and molecular alterations. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124:164–169. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kok V C, Tsai H J, Su C F. et al. The risks for ovarian, endometrial, breast, colorectal, and other cancers in women with newly diagnosed endometriosis or adenomyosis: a population-based study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;25:968–976. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ulrich U, Buchweitz O, Greb R. et al. Interdisciplinary S2k guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis: short version – AWMF Registry No. 015-045, August 2013. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2013;73:890–898. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stewart L M, Holman C D, Aboagye-Sarfo P. et al. In vitro fertilization, endometriosis, nulliparity and ovarian cancer risk. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;128:260–264. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Buis C C, van Leeuwen F E, Mooij T M. et al. Increased risk for ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumours in subfertile women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:3358–3369. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kobayashi H, Sumimoto K, Moniwa N. et al. Risk of developing ovarian cancer among women with ovarian endometrioma: a cohort study in Shizuoka, Japan. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17:37–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00754.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schmidt D, Ulrich U. Endometrioseassoziierte Tumorerkrankungen des Ovars. Pathologe. 2014;35:348–354. doi: 10.1007/s00292-014-1949-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sampson J A. Endometrial carcinoma of the ovary arising in endometrial tissue in that organ. Arch Surg. 1925;10:1–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Scott R B. Malignant changes in endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1953;2:283–289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kim H S, Kim T H, Chung H H. et al. Risk and prognosis of ovarian cancer in women with endometriosis: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:1878–1890. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Heaps J M, Nieberg R K, Berek J S. Malignant neoplasms arising in endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:1023–1028. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Irvin W, Pelkey T, Rice L. et al. Endometrial stromal sarcoma of the vulva arising in extraovarian endometriosis: a case report and literature review. Gynecol Oncol. 1998;71:313–316. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ulrich U, Rhiem K, Kaminski M. et al. Parametrial and rectovaginal adenocarcinoma arising from endometriosis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15:1206–1209. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2005.00184.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Prat J. Ovarian carcinomas: five distinct diseases with different origins, genetic alterations, and clinicopathological features. Virchows Arch. 2012;460:237–249. doi: 10.1007/s00428-012-1203-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.McCluggage W G. Morphological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma: a review with emphasis on new developments and pathogenesis. Pathology. 2011;43:420–432. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0b013e328348a6e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.LaGrenade A, Silverberg S G. Ovarian tumors associated with atypical endometriosis. Hum Pathol. 1988;19:1080–1084. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(88)80090-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fukunaga M, Nomura K, Ishikawa E. et al. Ovarian atypical endometriosis: its close association with malignant epithelial tumours. Histopathology. 1997;30:249–255. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1997.d01-592.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Clement P B. The pathology of endometriosis: a survey of the many faces of a common disease emphasizing diagnostic pitfalls and unusual and newly appreciated aspects. Adv Anat Pathol. 2007;14:241–260. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e3180ca7d7b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Seidman J D. Prognostic importance of hyperplasia and atypia in endometriosis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1996;15:1–9. doi: 10.1097/00004347-199601000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Prefumo F, Todeschini F, Fulcheri E. et al. Epithelial abnormalities in cystic ovarian endometriosis. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;84:280–284. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Maiorana A, Cicerone C, Niceta M. et al. Evaluation of serum CA 125 levels in patients with pelvic pain related to endometriosis. Int J Biol Markers. 2007;22:200–202. doi: 10.1177/172460080702200306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Worley M J, Welch W R, Berkowitz R S. et al. Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer: a review of pathogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:5367–5379. doi: 10.3390/ijms14035367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Varma R, Rollason T, Gupta J K. et al. Endometriosis and the neoplastic process. Reproduction. 2004;127:293–304. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Somigliana E, Vigano P, Parazzini F. et al. Association between endometriosis and cancer: a comprehensive review and a critical analysis of clinical and epidemiological evidence. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101:331–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yamaguchi K, Mandai M, Toyokuni S. et al. Contents of endometriotic cysts, especially the high concentration of free iron, are a possible cause of carcinogenesis in the cysts through the iron-induced persistent oxidative stress. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:32–40. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pylvas M, Puistola U, Laatio L. et al. Elevated serum 8-OHdG is associated with poor prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer. Anticancer Res. 2011;31:1411–1415. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sato N, Tsunoda H, Nishida M. et al. Loss of heterozygosity on 10q23.3 and mutation of the tumor suppressor gene PTEN in benign endometrial cyst of the ovary: possible sequence progression from benign endometrial cyst to endometrioid carcinoma and clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. Cancer Res. 2000;60:7052–7056. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wiegand K C, Shah S P, Al-Agha O M. et al. ARID1A mutations in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1532–1543. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Esteller M, Catasus L, Matias-Guiu X. et al. hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation is an early event in human endometrial tumorigenesis. Am J Pathol. 1999;155:1767–1772. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65492-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Stewart C J, Leung Y, Walsh M D. et al. KRAS mutations in ovarian low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma: association with concurrent endometriosis. Hum Pathol. 2012;43:1177–1183. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Shin J C, Ross H L, Elias S. et al. Detection of chromosomal aneuploidy in endometriosis by multi-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) Hum Genet. 1997;100:401–406. doi: 10.1007/s004390050524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Simpson J L Bischoff F Z Kamat A et al. Genetics of endometriosis Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 20033021–40.vii [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jiang X, Morland S J, Hitchcock A. et al. Allelotyping of endometriosis with adjacent ovarian carcinoma reveals evidence of a common lineage. Cancer Res. 1998;58:1707–1712. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Obata K, Hoshiai H. Common genetic changes between endometriosis and ovarian cancer. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2000;50 01:39–43. doi: 10.1159/000052877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Martini M, Ciccarone M, Garganese G. et al. Possible involvement of hMLH1, p 16(INK4 a) and PTEN in the malignant transformation of endometriosis. Int J Cancer. 2002;102:398–406. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Nezhat F, Cohen C, Rahaman J. et al. Comparative immunohistochemical studies of bcl-2 and p 53 proteins in benign and malignant ovarian endometriotic cysts. Cancer. 2002;94:2935–2940. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Vigano P, Somigliana E, Chiodo I. et al. Molecular mechanisms and biological plausibility underlying the malignant transformation of endometriosis: a critical analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:77–89. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmi037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Prowse A H, Manek S, Varma R. et al. Molecular genetic evidence that endometriosis is a precursor of ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:556–562. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kobayashi H, Sumimoto K, Kitanaka T. et al. Ovarian endometrioma–risks factors of ovarian cancer development. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;138:187–193. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zanetta G M, Webb M J, Li H. et al. Hyperestrogenism: a relevant risk factor for the development of cancer from endometriosis. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79:18–22. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Merritt M A, De Pari M, Vitonis A F. et al. Reproductive characteristics in relation to ovarian cancer risk by histologic pathways. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1406–1417. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Aris A. Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer: a ten-year cohort study of women living in the Estrie Region of Quebec, Canada. J Ovarian Res. 2010;3:2. doi: 10.1186/1757-2215-3-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Orezzoli J P, Russell A H, Oliva E. et al. Prognostic implication of endometriosis in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;110:336–344. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.05.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Davis M, Rauh-Hain J A, Andrade C. et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes of patients with clear cell and endometrioid ovarian cancer associated with endometriosis to papillary serous carcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132:760–766. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Scarfone G, Bergamini A, Noli S. et al. Characteristics of clear cell ovarian cancer arising from endometriosis: a two center cohort study. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;133:480–484. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Boyraz G, Selcuk I, Yazicioglu A. et al. Ovarian carcinoma associated with endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170:211–213. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Erzen M, Rakar S, Klancnik B. et al. Endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinoma (EAOC): an entity distinct from other ovarian carcinomas as suggested by a nested case-control study. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;83:100–108. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Melin A, Lundholm C, Malki N. et al. Endometriosis as a prognostic factor for cancer survival. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:948–955. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kumar S, Munkarah A, Arabi H. et al. Prognostic analysis of ovarian cancer associated with endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:630–6.3E8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Moen M H, Rees M, Brincat M. et al. EMAS position statement: Managing the menopause in women with a past history of endometriosis. Maturitas. 2010;67:94–97. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Soliman N F, Hillard T C. Hormone replacement therapy in women with past history of endometriosis. Climacteric. 2006;9:325–335. doi: 10.1080/13697130600868711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Van Gorp T, Amant F, Neven P. et al. Endometriosis and the development of malignant tumours of the pelvis. A review of literature. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;18:349–371. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2003.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ulrich U, Richter O, Wardelmann E. et al. [Endometriosis and malignoma] Zentralbl Gynakol. 2003;125:239–242. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-42277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES