Abstract

We have found that panel H in Figure 5 is mistakenly a duplication of panel E in Figure 8. According to our inspection of the original data sets, this is due to a mistake during the assembly of the panels. We show here the amended Figure 5, with the correct original image for panel H (crq expression in twist‐GAL4; UASSrpC background).
Figure 5.

The change does not affect the original conclusions presented.
