Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2015 Jul 9;4:500–509. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2015.06.022

Data for proteomic profiling of Anthers from a photosensitive male sterile mutant and wild-type cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Ji Liu a, Chaoyou Pang a, Hengling Wei a, Meizhen Song a, Yanyan Meng b, Jianhui Ma c, Shuli Fan a,, Shuxun Yu a,
PMCID: PMC4773279  PMID: 26958592

Abstract

Cotton is an important economic crop, used mainly for the production of textile fiber. Using a space mutation breeding technique, a novel photosensitive genetic male sterile mutant CCRI9106 was isolated from the wild-type upland cotton cultivar CCRI040029. To study the male sterile mechanisms of CCRI9106, histological and iTRAQ-facilitated proteomic analyses of anthers were performed. This data article contains data related to the research article titled iTRAQ-Facilitated Proteomic Profiling of Anthers From a Photosensitive Male Sterile Mutant and Wild-type Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)[1]. This research article describes the iTRAQ-facilitated proteomic analysis of the wild-type and a photosensitive male sterile mutant in cotton. The report indicated that exine formation defect is the key reason for male sterility in mutant plant. The information presented here represents the tables and figures that detail the processing of the raw data obtained from iTRAQ analysis.

Keywords: Photosensitive, Male sterility, Tapetum, Exine, Proteome, Pollen development


Specifications table.

Subject area Biology
More specific subject area Plant proteomics
Type of data Table and figure
How data was acquired Plant phenotype: DP72 light microscope (Olympus, Japan)
Scan electron microscopy: scanning electron microscopy S-530 (HITACHI, Japan)
Mass spectrometry: AB SCIEX Triple TOF 5600 System (AB SCIEX, USA)
Quantitative real-time PCR: ABI 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, USA)
Data format Processed
Experimental factors No pretreatment of samples was performed
Experimental features Total anther protein was extracted from mutant and wild-type plants by triplicate using a TCA–acetone method. Three replicates iTRAQ-facilitated proteomic analysis were conducted for protein identification and quantification. Any protein changed with a≥1.5-fold difference and a p-Value≤0.05 in at least two replicates would thus be considered as a significant DEP in our data.
Data source location Cotton anther samples were collected in Anyang, Henan Province, China. iTRAQ-facilitated proteomic analysis were conducted in Beijing Genomics Institute, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Data accessibility The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD002209. The reviewer account: username, reviewer23539@ebi.ac.uk; password: 3ts0ERFU.

Value of the data

  • An iTRAQ-based proteomic analysis in cotton anthers.

  • Identification of 6,121 high-confidence proteins in cotton anther.

  • There are 325 proteins show differential expression patterns between WT and MT.

  • The data enrich the understanding of the molecular regulatory mechanisms of male sterility.

1. Experimental design

Using a space mutation breeding technique, a novel photosensitive genetic male sterile mutant CCRI9106 was isolated from the wild-type upland cotton cultivar CCRI040029. Histological and iTRAQ-facilitated proteomic analyses of anthers were performed to explore male sterility mechanisms of the mutant.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Plant growth and anther collection

Two G. hirsutum L. genotypes, a PGMS mutant CCRI9106 and its WT line, CCRI040029, were used in this study. CCRI040029 was an elite upland variety bred in our lab, and the mutant line, CCRI9106, was created by space mutation in 2010 [2]. They were grown in an agronomic field in Anyang (Henan, China) from April to October (Fig. S1), and in Sanya (Hainan, China) from October to early April (Fig. S2). Thirty rows (8 m in length×0.8 m in width) were prepared for each genotype, and every 10 rows formed one replicate. To test the pollen fertility, anthers were stained with Alexander׳s solution. Additionally, anthers from both MT and WT at different development stages were collected for further analysis.

2.2. Scan electron microscopy

For SEM (Fig. S3), anthers were infiltrated with 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.2), dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol (from 30% to 100%), treated in acetone for 15 min, and transferred to isoamyl acetate for 20 min. The samples were then dried with a CO2 critical-point drying system (HITACHI HCP-2, Japan). Subsequently, pollen grains were coated with gold:palladium and imaged using a scanning electron microscopy (HITACHI S-530, Japan).

2.3. Protein extraction and quantification

For protein extraction, a TCA–acetone (trichloroacetic acid) method [3] was selected, performed according to Pang et al. with minor modifications [4]. In brief, ~1.5 g of frozen anther was ground with 10% polyvinyl polypyrrolidone (w/w) in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle. The resulting fine powder was mixed with 10% (w/v) TCA in cold acetone containing 0.07% (w/v) 2-mercaptoethanol for at least 2 h and subsequently centrifuged at 12,000 g for 1 h at 4 °C. The pellet was washed first with cold acetone containing 0.07% (w/v) 2-mercaptoethanol and then with 80% cold acetone and finally was suspended in lysis buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS, 20 mM dithiothreitol, 2% EDTA-free protease-inhibitor). The supernatant was centrifuged at 120,000 g for 90 min at 4 °C and used for further assays. Next, the purified proteins underwent a reductive alkylation reaction. The concentration of the protein solution was determined with the 2-D Quant Kit (GE Healthcare, USA) with bovine serum albumin as a standard. The supernatants were stored at –80 °C until required.

2.4. iTRAQ labeling

Three independent biological replicates were performed in our experiment (Fig. S4). Three internal standards (IS-1, IS-2, and IS-3) were prepared by mixing one biological replicate from the six tested samples. Then, proteins (100 μg) from each sample were digested by trypsin and labeled with 8-plex iTRAQ reagents (Applied Biosystems, USA) as follows: 113, IS; 114, IS; 115, WT-S1; 116, WT-S2; 117, WT-S3; 118, MT-S1; 119, MT-S2; 121, MT-S3. The labeled samples were pooled and resolved into 20 fractions using an Ultremex SCX column containing 5-μm particles (Phenomenex, USA). The eluted fractions were then desalted using a Strata X C18 column (Phenomenex, USA) and dried under vacuum. Each fraction was resuspended in certain volume of mobile phase A (2% ACN, 0.1% FA) and centrifuged at 20,000 g for 10 min. The final average peptide concentration in each fraction was about 0.25 μg/μL.

2.5. LC–MS/MS analysis

A splitless nanoACQuity (Waters, USA) system coupled with Triple TOF was used for analytical separation. The system uses microfluidic traps and nanofluidic columns packed with Symmetry C18 (5 μm, 180 μm×20 mm) for online trapping, desalting, and nanofluidic columns packed with BEH130 C18 (1.7 μm, 100 μm×100 mm) for analytical separations. Solvents were purchased from thermo fisher scientific and composed of water/acetonitrile/formicacid (A: 98/2/0.1%; B: 2/98/0.1%). A portion of 2.25 μg (9 μL) sample was loaded, and trapping and desalting were carried out at 2 μL/min for 15 min with 99% mobile phase A. At a flow rate of 300 nL/min, analytical separation was established by maintaining 5% B for 1 min. In the following 64 min, a linear gradient to 35% B occurred in 40 min. Following the peptide elution window, in 5 min the gradient was increased to 80% B and maintained for 5 min. Initial chromatographic conditions were restored in 2 min.

Data acquisition was performed with the AB SCIEX Triple TOF 5600 System (Concord, USA) fitted with a Nanospray III source (Concord, USA) and a pulled quartz tip as the emitter (New Objectives, Woburn, USA). Data was acquired using an ion spray voltage of 2.5 kV, curtain gas of 30 PSI, nebulizer gas of 15 PSI, and an interface heater temperature of 150 °C. The MS was operated with a RP greater than or equal to 30,000 FWHM for TOF MS scans. For IDA, survey scans were acquired in 250 ms and as many as 30 product ion scans were collected if exceeding a threshold of 120 counts per second (counts/s) and with a 2+ to 5+ charge-state. Total cycle time was fixed to 3.3 s. Q2 transmission window was 100 Da for 100%. Four time bins were summed for each scan at a pulser frequency value of 11 kHz through monitoring of the 40 GHz multichannel TDC detector with four-anode/channel detection. A sweeping collision energy setting of 35±5 eV coupled with iTRAQ adjust rolling collision energy was applied to all precursor ions for collision-induced dissociation. Dynamic exclusion was set for 1/2 of peak width (18 s), and then the precursor was refreshed off the exclusion list.

2.6. Database search and quantification

Protein identification and quantification were simultaneously performed using the Mascot 2.3.02 software (Matrix Science, Boston, USA). Searches were made against our cotton_AD_nr database, including 38,460 sequences from the G. raimondii genome [5] and 43,097 from the G. arboretum genome [6], the putative contributors of the D and A subgenomes, respectively, of the G. hirsutum L. genome (AADD). The search parameters were set as follows: trypsin was chosen as the enzyme with one missed cleavage allowed; the fixed modifications of carbamidomethylation were set as Cys, and variable modifications of oxidation as Met; peptide tolerance was set as 0.05 Da, and MS/MS tolerance was set as 0.1 Da. The peptide charge was set as Mr, and monoisotopic mass was chosen. An automatic decoy database search strategy was employed to estimate the false discovery rate (FDR). The FDR was calculated as the false positive matches divided by the total matches. In the final search results, the FDR was less than 1.5%. The iTRAQ 8-plex was chosen for quantification during the search. For protein identification, only peptides with significant scores (≥20) at the 99% confidence interval were used, and each confident protein included at least one unique peptide. For protein quantitation, “median” was chosen for the protein ratio type, only unique peptides were used to quantify proteins. The median intensities were set as normalization. We assigned the 6121 proteins detected from at least two replicates as finally identified proteins in this study (Table S1).

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository [7] with the dataset identifier PXD002209.

We performed the analysis of biological replicates at each stage. The average CV of each stage ranges from 0.19–0.24, indicating high repeatability of our data (Table 1). Any protein changed with a≥1.5-fold difference and a p-Value≤0.05 in at least two replicates would thus be considered as a significant DEP in our data (Table S3).

Table 1.

Analysis of the reproducibility between the three iTRAQ exprements of replicate samples.

IS_113-VS-IS_114
Stage 1: WT_115-VS-MT_118
Stage 2: WT_116-VS-MT_119
Stage 3: WT_117-VS-MT_121
Cut-off at Number Total Coverage (%) Cut-off at Number Total Coverage (%) Cut-off at Number Total Coverage (%) Cut-off at Number Total Coverage (%)
0.10 1126 2906 38.75 0.10 839 3109 26.99 0.10 982 2975 33.01 0.10 810 2702 29.98
0.20 2038 2906 70.13 0.20 1754 3109 56.42 0.20 1938 2975 65.14 0.20 1728 2702 63.95
0.30 2540 2906 87.41 0.30 2407 3109 77.42 0.30 2471 2975 83.06 0.30 2298 2702 85.05
0.40 2752 2906 94.70 0.40 2749 3109 88.42 0.40 2668 2975 89.68 0.40 2514 2702 93.04
0.50 2851 2906 98.11 0.50 2852 3109 91.73 0.50 2760 2975 92.77 0.50 2595 2702 96.04
0.60 2890 2906 99.45 0.60 2883 3109 92.73 0.60 2811 2975 94.49 0.60 2620 2702 96.97
0.70 2903 2906 99.90 0.70 2914 3109 93.73 0.70 2834 2975 95.26 0.70 2633 2702 97.45
0.80 2905 2906 99.97 0.80 2974 3109 95.66 0.80 2864 2975 96.27 0.80 2639 2702 97.67
0.90 2906 2906 100.00 0.90 2995 3109 96.33 0.90 2870 2975 96.47 0.90 2656 2702 98.30
>1.0 2906 2906 100.00 >1.0 3109 3109 100.00 >1.0 2975 2975 100.00 >1.0 2702 2702 100.00
CV (average)=0.17 CV (average)=0.24 CV (average)=0.21 CV (average)=0.19

The table lists the cut-off points (variation), and the corresponding coverage (%) of quantified proteins.

a. “Cut off at” means the variation between the fold change and 1, and the fold change is calculated between two samples in the three experements.

b. “Number” means the number of proteins meet the cut off value.

c. “Total” means the total number of proteins quantified in at least two exprements.

d. “Coverage (%)” is calculated as the “Number” divided by the “Total”,and the higer coverage at a smaller cut off value means the better repeatability.

2.7. Functional analyses

Functional category analysis (Table 2) was performed with Blast2GO software (http://www.geneontology.org) and Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) of Proteins System software (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/). To compare with Arabidopsis pollen proteome (3517 proteins from Arabidopsis pollen proteome analyses by Noir [8], Holmes-Davis [9] and Grobei [10]), all proteins in this study were blasted for the closest Arabidopsis homolog with E-value≤10−10 (Table S5). After a survey of the literatures, we updated a previously published list [11] of genes affected pollen development or pollen tube growth from 215 to 323 genes in Arabidopsis (Table S6).

Table 2.

Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of DEPs from each stage.

GO category GO term Description Cluster frequency P-value Proteins
Biological process GO:0009651 Response to salt stress 5 of 10 in the list 0.0011 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_D_gene_10026043,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420
Biological process GO:0010584 Pollen exine formation 2 of 10 in the list 0.0017 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420
Biological process GO:0016053 Organic acid biosynthetic process 5 of 10 in the list 0.0018 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_15494
Biological p GO:0009653 Anatomical structure morphogenesis 5 of 10 in the list 0.0021 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_15494,Cotton_A_27442
Biological process GO:0000097 Sulfur amino acid biosynthetic process 3 of 10 in the list 0.0035 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_A_15420
Biological process GO:0000096 Sulfur amino acid metabolic process 3 of 10 in the list 0.0046 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_A_15420
Biological process GO:0044283 Small molecule biosynthetic process 5 of 10 in the list 0.0049 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_15494
Biological process GO:0044711 Single-organism biosynthetic process 5 of 10 in the list 0.0065 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_15494
Biological process GO:0048869 Cellular developmental process 4 of 10 in the list 0.0074 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_15494,Cotton_A_27442
Biological Process GO:0045229 External encapsulating structure organization 3 of 10 in the list 0.0077 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_15494
Biological process GO:0044272 Sulfur compound biosynthetic process 3 of 10 in the list 0.0081 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_A_15420
Biological process GO:0009086 Methionine biosynthetic process 2 of 10 in the list 0.0087 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420
Biological process GO:0009751 Response to salicylic acid stimulus 2 of 10 in the list 0.0092 Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060
Biological Process GO:0032989 Cellular component morphogenesis 3 of 10 in the list 0.0098 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_27442
Biological process GO:0006555 Methionine metabolic process 2 of 10 in the list 0.0100 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420
Biological Process GO:1901607 Alpha-amino acid biosynthetic process 3 of 10 in the list 0.0122 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_A_15420
Biological process GO:0006790 Sulfur compound metabolic process 3 of 10 in the list 0.0125 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_A_15420
Biological Process GO:0009067 Aspartate family amino acid biosynthetic process 2 of 10 in the list 0.0134 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420
Biological process GO:0010035 Response to inorganic substance 5 of 10 in the list 0.0143 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_D_gene_10026043,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420
Biological process GO:0009309 Amine biosynthetic process 2 of 10 in the list 0.0162 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420
Biological process GO:0009409 Response to cold 3 of 10 in the list 0.0177 Cotton_D_gene_10026043,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060
Biological process GO:0009414 Response to water deprivation 2 of 10 in the list 0.0179 Cotton_D_gene_10026043,Cotton_D_gene_10040060
Biological process GO:0009066 Aspartate family amino acid metabolic process 2 of 10 in the list 0.0189 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420
Biological process GO:0009415 Response to water stimulus 2 of 10 in the list 0.0189 Cotton_D_gene_10026043,Cotton_D_gene_10040060
Biological process GO:0044767 Single-organism developmental process 5 of 10 in the list 0.0190 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_15494,Cotton_A_27442
Biological process GO:0019752 Carboxylic acid metabolic process 5 of 10 in the list 0.0227 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_15494
Biological process GO:0043436 Oxoacid metabolic process 5 of 10 in the list 0.0228 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_15494
Biological process GO:0006082 Organic acid metabolic process 5 of 10 in the list 0.0229 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_15494
Biological process GO:0009555 Pollen development 2 of 10 in the list 0.0237 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420
Biological process GO:0008652 Cellular amino acid biosynthetic process 3 of 10 in the list 0.0242 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_A_15420
Biological process GO:0048588 Developmental cell growth 2 of 10 in the list 0.0245 Cotton_A_15494,Cotton_A_27442
Biological process GO:1901605 Alpha-amino acid metabolic process 3 of 10 in the list 0.0274 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_A_15420
Biological process GO:1901566 Organonitrogen compound biosynthetic process 4 of 10 in the list 0.0298 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420
Biological process GO:0009620 Response to fungus 2 of 10 in the list 0.0311 Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060
Biological process GO:0016043 Cellular component organization 6 of 10 in the list 0.0317 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_15494,Cotton_A_27442,Cotton_A_37611
Biological process GO:0048646 Anatomical structure formation involved in morphogenesis 2 of 10 in the list 0.0356 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420
Biological process GO:0034641 Cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process 6 of 10 in the list 0.0356 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_15494,Cotton_A_37611
Biological process GO:0060560 Developmental growth involved in morphogenesis 2 of 10 in the list 0.0388 Cotton_A_15494,Cotton_A_27442
Biological process GO:0048856 Anatomical structure development 5 of 10 in the list 0.0393 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_15494,Cotton_A_27442
Biological process GO:0044281 Small molecule metabolic process 6 of 10 in the list 0.0413 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_14434,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_15494
Biological process GO:0071840 Cellular component organization or biogenesis 6 of 10 in the list 0.0438 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_15494,Cotton_A_27442,Cotton_A_37611
Biological process GO:0048589 Developmental growth 2 of 10 in the list 0.0467 Cotton_A_15494,Cotton_A_27442
Biological process GO:0009308 Amine metabolic process 2 of 10 in the list 0.0478 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420
Molecular function GO:0080019 Fatty-acyl-CoA reductase (alcohol-forming) activity 2 of 10 in the list 0.0000 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420
Molecular function GO:0016491 Oxidoreductase activity 7 of 10 in the list 0.0003 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_D_gene_10026043,Cotton_D_gene_10025048,Cotton_A_14434,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_15494
Molecular function GO:0003871 5-Methyltetrahydropteroyltriglutamate-homocysteine S-methyltransferase activity 2 of 10 in the list 0.0003 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420
Molecular function GO:0051213 Dioxygenase activity 2 of 10 in the list 0.0030 Cotton_D_gene_10025048,Cotton_D_gene_10040060
Molecular function GO:0016620 Oxidoreductase activity, acting on the aldehyde or oxo group of donors, NAD or NADP as acceptor 2 of 10 in the list 0.0048 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420
Molecular function GO:0016614 Oxidoreductase activity, acting on CH-OH group of donors 3 of 10 in the list 0.0056 Cotton_D_gene_10026043,Cotton_A_14434,Cotton_A_15494
Molecular function GO:0050662 Coenzyme binding 3 of 10 in the list 0.0080 Cotton_D_gene_10026043,Cotton_A_14434,Cotton_A_15494
Molecular function GO:0016903 Oxidoreductase activity, acting on the aldehyde or oxo group of donors 2 of 10 in the list 0.0086 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420
Molecular function GO:0016705 Oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen 2 of 10 in the list 0.0129 Cotton_D_gene_10025048,Cotton_D_gene_10040060
Molecular function GO:0008168 Methyltransferase activity 2 of 10 in the list 0.0174 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420
Molecular function GO:0016741 Transferase activity, transferring one-carbon groups 2 of 10 in the list 0.0188 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420
Molecular function GO:0016628 Oxidoreductase activity, acting on the CH-CH group of donors, NAD or NADP as acceptor 2 of 10 in the list 0.0208 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420
Molecular function GO:0048037 Cofactor binding 3 of 10 in the list 0.0246 Cotton_D_gene_10026043,Cotton_A_14434,Cotton_A_15494
Molecular function GO:0016627 Oxidoreductase activity, acting on the CH-CH group of donors 2 of 10 in the list 0.0311 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_15420
Molecular function GO:0016616 Oxidoreductase activity, acting on the CH-OH group of donors, NAD or NADP as acceptor 2 of 10 in the list 0.0485 Cotton_D_gene_10026043,Cotton_A_15494
Cellular component GO:0009941 Chloroplast envelope 4 of 11 in the list 0.0086 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420
Cellular component GO:0009526 Plastid envelope 4 of 11 in the list 0.0099 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420
Cellular component GO:0009536 Plastid 8 of 11 in the list 0.0115 Cotton_A_00728,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_D_gene_10007359,Cotton_A_37611,Cotton_D_gene_10026043,Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_02073
Cellular component GO:0044444 Cytoplasmic part 11 of 11 in the list 0.0289 Cotton_A_00728,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_15494,Cotton_D_gene_10007359,Cotton_A_27442,Cotton_A_37611,Cotton_D_gene_10026043,Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_14434,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060
Cellular component GO:0005829 Cytosol 7 of 11 in the list 0.0289 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_D_gene_10026043,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_A_00728,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_A_15494,Cotton_A_27442
Cellular component GO:0009507 Chloroplast 7 of 11 in the list 0.0319 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_D_gene_10026043,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_00728,Cotton_A_15420,Cotton_D_gene_10007359
Cellular component GO:0031967 Organelle envelope 4 of 11 in the list 0.0398 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420
Cellular component GO:0031975 Envelope 4 of 11 in the list 0.0398 Cotton_D_gene_10020479,Cotton_A_02073,Cotton_D_gene_10040060,Cotton_A_15420

DEPs are classified into three GO categories: biological process, molecular function and cellular component.

“Cluster Frequency” means number of DEPs in the list.

P-value” means the reliability of each term, only terms with P-value<0.05 are shown.

“Proteins” are the DEPs annotated to the term.

2.8. RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)

To verify whether the differences in protein abundance were reflected at the transcriptional level, and to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the proteomic analysis, 12 genes, one gene randomly selected from each cluster, were analyzed by qPCR at all three stages in WT and MT plants (Fig. S5). Total RNA from anther samples was extracted using the RN38-EASYspin Plus Plant RNA Kit (Aidlab, China) according to the manufacturer׳s protocol. Approximately 1 µg RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using SuperScriptIII (Invitrogen, USA) following its protocol. And qPCRs were carried out using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Roche Applied Science, Germany) on an ABI 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, USA) with three replicates. Data were processed using the 2−ΔΔCt method, and the GhUBQ7 (GhUBQUTIN7, DQ116441) was used as an endogenous reference gene and stage 1 was set as reference sample for data normalization. All the primer pairs used were shown in Table 3.

Table 3.

Primers sequences used for qPCR.

Primer name Gene Name Primer Sequences

Cotton_D_gene_10026043_F AKRC9 GCCATATCGACTGCGCTCA
Cotton_D_gene_10026043_R TGATAAACAGCTCCTCACGTT
Cotton_A_12079_F RPS23 ACTCTGCCATCCGAAAGTGTG
Cotton_A_12079_R CGCATGACCCTTTCGTCCA
Cotton_A_02073_F IPYR1 CCCAAAGAGTCAAGTGCAAA
Cotton_A_02073_R TTGCCCTTCTTAGTATCCTG
Cotton_A_23038_F AL2B4 AGGGCTTCTATATTCAACCCACA
Cotton_A_23038_R CCGAATAACCTCGTTGATGTCC
Cotton_A_20880_F ENPL TCCACGAGGAACACGCCTT
Cotton_A_20880_R TCTCCTGCCATGTGTAAATCGG
Cotton_A_35622_F ACC1 TTCTCTTTCTGTAAGGGGTC
Cotton_A_35622_R TTTCCTTGCCAATAGACGTT
Cotton_A_01714_F CALM7 GAATTCCTTAACCTGATGGCAAG
Cotton_A_01714_R GTCAAACACCCTGAATGCCTC
Cotton_D_gene_10035730_F RBG8 ATCCTCTGAATGTAAACCGAA
Cotton_D_gene_10035730_R TTTTCTGCCTTGAATAATCAGC
Cotton_A_16087_F APX6 TGCCATCCTATTCTGGTTCGT
Cotton_A_16087_R TGCATGTTTCAGCTCGACT
Cotton_A_21984_F eiF2B5 TTTACTTCAACAGCCAACCC
Cotton_A_21984_R TCAATTTATCCGATCGAAGCTC
Cotton_D_gene_10039872_F PPI1 TCACTTTTACCAGAGCCGTTC
Cotton_D_gene_10039872_R GAGCCATAAACTTCTCGACCT
Cotton_D_gene_10027767_F Unknown AAAGCTCGTCTTGCCCGAT
Cotton_D_gene_10027767_R TCCGAAAACCTGATTGCCCTT
Cotton_A_06160_F CO4C1 AAAGGACTCTGCCTATCTCCA
Cotton_A_06160_R TGTCTGGCTATTTTGAGCTTC
Cotton_D_gene_10008896_F CYP450 CAGATAACAACTTCGCTCGG
Cotton_D_gene_10008896_R CTTTCCAAGTAGAGCTTCGGA
Cotton_A_21314_F TKPR2 CTCGCAACTCTAATTGATCCA
Cotton_A_21314_R GCTTCTTGACATCGAAACGGTA
Cotton_A_15420_F MS2a CCAAGATCTATACCCGAGT
Cotton_A_15420_R CATCCATATTTTCTAGCCCTT
Cotton_D_gene_10020479_F MS2b CTCCCTAGATTCGCCTTTGCTA
Cotton_D_gene_10020479_R CACGGCCACTCTAAAGCTC
Cotton_D_gene_10018569_F QRT3 AGCTCATTTCCTAGCCATGCC
Cotton_D_gene_10018569_R AGCTTGATCCACCGTGACGA
Cotton_D_gene_10002752_F ABC26G TACAATCCGGCTCTTAAACGA
Cotton_D_gene_10002752_R CAGGCTCATGTCACTCGGAA
Cotton_A_07399_F EA6 AAATCGATCTCACCGGGAAC
Cotton_A_07399_R TGCAAACATTTGACAATGCG
Cotton_D_gene_10029879_F SDR2A ACATTCATTGTGATGTAGCCAA
Cotton_D_gene_10029879_R AAACAGTATGTCTAGTTTGCCTT
GhUB7-F1 GhUB7 TAGAGTCCGCTTCTACCTT
GhUB7-R1 ACGATTACGGAAAATCAAAGCC

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2015.06.022.

Contributor Information

Ji Liu, Email: liujicricaas@163.com.

Chaoyou Pang, Email: chypang@163.com.

Hengling Wei, Email: henglingwei@163.com.

Meizhen Song, Email: songmz@cricaas.com.cn.

Yanyan Meng, Email: baiyun405@163.com.

Jianhui Ma, Email: mjhui1983@163.com.

Shuli Fan, Email: fansl@cricaas.com.cn.

Shuxun Yu, Email: yu@cricaas.com.cn.

Appendix A. Supplementary materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.zip (9.1MB, zip)

Supplementary material

mmc2.zip (8.3MB, zip)

References

  • 1.Ji Liu Chaoyou Pang, Wei Hengling, Song Meizhen, Meng Yanyan, Ma Jianhui, Fan Shuli, Shuxun Yu. iTRAQ-Facilitated Proteomic. Profiling of anthers from a photosensitive male sterile mutant and wild-type cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) J. Proteomics. 2015;126:68–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.05.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ma J., Wei H., Liu J., Song M., Pang C., Wang L. Selection and characterization of a novel photoperiod-sensitive male sterile line in upland cotton. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2013;55:608–618. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sheoran I.S., Ross A.R.S., Olson D.J.H., Sawhney V.K. Compatibility of plant protein extraction methods with mass spectrometry for proteome analysis. Plant Sci. 2009;176:99–104. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pang C., Wang H., Pang Y., Xu C., Jiao Y., Qin Y.-M. Comparative proteomics indicates that biosynthesis of pectic precursors is important for cotton fiber and arabidopsis root hair elongation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2010;9:2019–2033. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M110.000349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang K., Wang Z., Li F., Ye W., Wang J., Song G. The draft genome of a diploid cotton Gossypium raimondii. Nat. Genet. 2012;44:1098–1103. doi: 10.1038/ng.2371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Li F., Fan G., Wang K., Sun F., Yuan Y., Song G. Genome sequence of the cultivated cotton Gossypium arboreum. Nat. Genet. 2014;46:567–572. doi: 10.1038/ng.2987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vizcaino J.A., Cote R.G., Csordas A., Dianes J.A., Fabregat A., Foster J.M. The proteomics identifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D1063–D1069. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Noir S., Bräutigam A., Colby T., Schmidt J., Panstruga R. A reference map of the Arabidopsis thaliana mature pollen proteome. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005;337:1257–1266. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.09.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Holmes-Davis R., Tanaka C.K., Vensel W.H., Hurkman W.J., McCormick S. Proteome mapping of mature pollen of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proteomics. 2005;5:4864–4884. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200402011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Grobei M.A., Qeli E., Brunner E., Rehrauer H., Zhang R., Roschitzki B. Deterministic protein inference for shotgun proteomics data provides new insights into Arabidopsis pollen development and function. Genome Res. 2009;19:1786–1800. doi: 10.1101/gr.089060.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ischebeck T, Valledor L, Lyon D, Gingl S, Nagler M, Meijon M. Comprehensive cell-specific protein analysis in early and late pollen development from diploid microsporocytes to pollen tube growth. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2014;13:295–310. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.028100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.zip (9.1MB, zip)

Supplementary material

mmc2.zip (8.3MB, zip)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES