Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2015 Oct 9;5:626–641. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2015.09.045

Data analysis and other considerations concerning the study of precipitation in Al–Mg–Si alloys by Atom Probe Tomography

MW Zandbergen a,, Q Xu b, A Cerezo a, GDW Smith a
PMCID: PMC4773378  PMID: 26958619

Abstract

Atom Probe Tomography (APT) analysis and hardness measurements were used to characterize the early stages of precipitation in an Al–0.51 at%Mg–0.94 at%Si alloy as reported in the accompanying Acta Materialia paper [1]. The changes in microstructure were investigated after single-stage or multi-stage heat treatments including natural ageing at 298 K (NA), pre-ageing at 353 K (PA), and automotive paint-bake ageing conditions at 453 K (PB). This article provides Supporting information and a detailed report on the experimental conditions and the data analysis methods used for this investigation. Careful design of experimental conditions and analysis methods was carried out to obtain consistent and reliable results. Detailed data on clustering for prolonged NA and PA treatments have been reported.


Specifications Table

Subject area Materials Science
More specific subject area Nanostructure, metallurgy, precipitation, aluminium alloys
Type of data Table, image (APT, TEM), figure
How data was acquired ATP, LEAP
ATP, LAR-3DAP
TEM, FEI Tecnai microscope
Data format Analyzed
Experimental factors Heat treatments at 298 K, 353 K and 453 K
Experimental features Heat treatments were performed in an air furnace or oil bath. Samples for APT were made by electropolishing
Data source location Department of Materials, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford, UK
Data accessibility Data is in this article

Value of the data

  • The description of how the type of APT and the experimental settings influence detection of clusters and precipitation will be useful when comparing results obtained between different APT apparatus.

  • Detailed description of which experimental parameters influence detection of clusters in ternary Al–Mg–Si by APT will help the community to design new experiments to measure precipitation in ternary Al–Mg–Si.

  • The characterisation of the size and number density of precipitates and clusters during long ageing times may be used by the community to validate microstructure evolution models.

  • The variation in composition of the precipitates and clusters can be used by the community to validate thermodynamic and kinetic databases for the Al–Mg–Si system.

1. Data, experimental design, materials and methods

1.1. Characteristics of the different stages of the precipitation in Al–Mg–Si alloys

See Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of phases observed in Al–Mg–Si alloys as reported in the literature.

Type Compositiona Unit cell Morphology Ref.
Clusters Mg/Si: 1–2 Spherical [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]
GP zones/ Initial β″/ Pre- β″ MgxAl5−xSi6 or Mg2+xAl7-x-ySi2+y Monoclinic, C2/m, a=1.48, b=0.405, c=0.648 nm; β=105.3° Spherical 1–3 nm/needles of 2×2×20 nm [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]
β″ Mg5Si6 Monoclinic, C2/m, a=1.516, b=0.405, c=0.674 nm; β=105.3° Needles of ~4×4×50 nm [24], [25], [26]
β′ Mg1.8Si Hexagonal, P63, a=0.715, c=0.405/1.215 nm; γ=120° Needles >100 nm long, 10 nm in diameter [18], [20], [27]
U1 (Type A) MgAl2Si2 Trigonal, P-3m1, a=0.405, c=0.674 nm; γ=120° Needles >100 nm long, 15 nm in diameter [20], [28], [29]
U2 (Type B) MgAlSi Orthorhombic, Pnma, a=0.675, b=0.405, c=0.794 nm Needles >100 nm long, 15 nm in diameter [20], [29]
B′ (Type C) Mg9Al3Si7 Hexagonal, a=1.03 nm, c=0.405 nm Lath-shaped [30]
β Mg2Si FCC, CaF, a=0.639 nm Plates or Cubes of 10–20 μm [31], [32]
a

The Al content of the early-stage phases is very difficult to determine and is therefore not given here.

1.2. Experimental design

1.2.1. Heat treatments and techniques

The composition of the investigated ternary Al–Mg–Si alloy is shown in Table 2. Sheets were cold-rolled to 1 mm thickness. All heat treatments were performed in an air furnace unless stated otherwise. The samples were solid solution heat-treated (SSHT) at 835 K for 30 min followed by a water quench to room temperature. Following SSHT, single or multi-stage ageing treatments were performed at 298 K (NA), 353 K (PA) and 453 K (PB). For multi-stage heat treatments including a PB treatment, the PB time was kept constant at 30 min. The precursor stages were systematically varied to mimic the different stages of industrial production. In some cases a transient heat treatment in an oil bath (referred to as a spike) was given for 10 s at 453 K before PA. The spike was given 1 min after the solid solution heat treatment (SSHT), and 2 min before PA. After the spike the material was water-quenched. Keeping the times constant between SSHT and the ageing treatments was important to get reproducible results. PB or PA treatments were commenced 1 or 3 min after the water quench, respectively. If necessary, the material was stored in liquid nitrogen after heat treatments to inhibit the influence of any subsequent NA. The various heat treatments are listed in Table 3.

Table 2.

Composition of the alloy in wt% and at%.

Al Si Mg Cu Fe Mn
(wt%) Balance 0.98±0.02 0.46±0.01 0.029±0.002 0.17±0.01 0.10±0.02
(at%) Balance 0.94±0.02 0.51±0.01 0.013±0.001 0.08±0.01 0.05±0.01
Measured by APT
(at%) Balance 0.95±0.01 0.46±0.01 0.016±0.001 0.03±0.01
Table 3.

Heat treatments.

Heat treatment
1 min NA+PB 1 min natural ageing at 298 K+10 min, 30 min, 4 h, 18 h, 400 h, or 580 h ageing at 453 K
NA 100, 1000 and 10,000 min natural ageing at 298 K
PA (+ NA) 2 h, 10 h or 1 week pre-ageing at 353 K (+ 1 week natural ageing at 298 K)
Spike+PA+NA 10 s at 453 K+2 h or 10 h pre-ageing at 353 K+1 week natural ageing at 298 K
NA+PB 1 min, 10 min, 100 min or 1 week natural ageing at 298 K+30 min ageing at 453 K
2 or 10 h PA+1 week NA+PB 2 h or 10 h pre-ageing at 353 K+1 week natural ageing at 298 K+30 min ageing at 453 K
Spike+2 h PA+NA+PB 10 s at 453 K+2 h or 10 h pre-ageing at 353 K+1 week natural ageing at 298 K+30 min ageing at 453 K

Hardness measurements were carried out using a calibrated Vickers indenter at a 2 kg load and an indentation time of 10 s. 5 measurements were carried out across each sample to give a mean hardness value. The experimental error was estimated by dividing the standard deviation value by the square root of the number of measurements.

Needle-shaped specimens for APT experiments were made by a standard electropolishing method [33] from heat-treated thin bars by applying 10–15 V on the specimen in a 25% perchloric acid (65%) and 75% acetic acid (100%) solution at 278 K. These tips were then back-polished when necessary in a solution of 2% perchloric acid (65%) in 2-butoxyethanol. For APT analysis, two different types of 3D atom probe were used, a local-electrode atom probe (LEAP™) [34], [35] and a large-angle-reflectron 3D atom probe (LAR-3DAP™) [36]. Analyses were carried out at specimen temperatures of 25–30 K and pulse voltages of 15–20% of the standing DC voltage.

1.2.2. APT analysis

Multiple samples were analysed for each heat treatment wherever possible. The size, morphology, and number density of the particles and the matrix compositions were extracted from the APT data by using particle selection software in PoSAP and IVAS. Solute atoms (Mg and Si) were identified to be part of the same particle when they were within a maximum linear separation distance, d, from each other. A second parameter Nmin was used, defined as the minimum number of solute atoms a particle had to contain for it to be identified as such. When a particle has fewer than Nmin solute atoms, it was disregarded. Values of d and Nmin were chosen so that no artefact solute “particles” were observed in a random solid solution of the same alloy composition. These values were determined by randomly assigning atom identities to the experimentally-observed positions in data sets and testing different Nmin and d values on these randomized data. For LEAP measurements, a d of 0.65 nm and Nmin of 10 solute atoms was used. As Nmin was set at 10, particles smaller than 10 detected solute atoms were not selected. A d of 0.70 nm was allowed for LAR-3DAP measurements due to the lower detection efficiency of the LAR-3DAP (35% versus 50% for the LEAP). It should be noted that, due to these limited detection efficiencies, the particles contained 2–2.86 times as many solute atoms in reality as were detected in this work. The average size as detected by LAR-3DAP was adjusted by multiplying by 0.50/0.35 to correct for the difference in detection efficiency between LEAP and LAR-3DAP.

In some cases, further particle analysis was carried out using a Nmin of 5. Lowering Nmin and leaving d constant leads statistically to the selection of artefact “particles” in datasets with a random solute distribution. To take this into account, the relevant datasets were randomized to find the number density of artefact “particles” in the equivalent random solute distribution using a Nmin of 5. An estimated number density for real particles consisting of more than 5 solute atoms was then calculated from the difference in number density between original and randomized datasets.

IVAS software was used to determine the dimensions of each particle measured along three orthogonal axes, x, y, and z. This analysis was only carried out on particles found using the parameters d=0.65 and Nmin=70 for LEAP measurements. The precipitate length corresponded to the longest (z) axis, e.g. the elongated direction of a β″ precipitate. For lath-shaped precipitates, the shortest (x) axis indicated the depth of the precipitates, whereas the (y) axis indicated the width of precipitates. The shortest (x) axis was used to indicate the diameter of particles that were needle-shaped. The statistical errors for number density of particles and particle Mg/Si ratios were calculated assuming a Poisson distribution for the particle population [33].

The measured overall solute concentrations by APT are shown in Table 2. The Mg concentration is underestimated by about 10%. The statistical error for the measured solute concentrations, based on the number of atoms in the dataset, was 0.01–0.02 at%. However, the systematic error was higher due to minor sample-to-sample composition variations and differences in experimental conditions and was estimated to be around 0.05 at%. The mean particle size was defined as the average number of solutes atoms in the particles. The error for this value was estimated by dividing the standard deviation of mean particles size by the square root of the number of particles. The statistical error for the average particle dimensions was similarly estimated by dividing standard deviation of average particle length by the square root of the number of particles.

Determination of the number density of particles according to their length was sometimes difficult, because some particles were cut off at the edges of the analysis. To take this into account, particles shorter than 6 nm or containing fewer than 100 solute atoms as measured by LEAP and cut off at the edges were discarded. To characterize the length of particles after 580 h PB (when the length of particles could not be determined by APT), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed on a needle-shaped APT sample using a FEI Tecnai microscope at TU Delft.

1.2.3. APT considerations

It should be noted that LEAP and LAR-3DAP measurements can give differences in results with respect to particle chemistry (by 20–30%) and number density (by 10–60%), especially in the cases of the very smallest particles [37]. These variations are due to differences in overall detection efficiency, field-of-view and mass resolution for the two types of atom probe. However, the trends in the data are the same in both atom probes. In general, the particle chemistries and number densities reported here are those detected by LEAP, to ensure full compatibility between data sets. The applied DC voltage also has a large influence on detection of these particles as the detected number density for the very smallest particles (containing fewer than 40 solute atoms) can decrease by as much as 20–30% with 1 kV of increase in voltage, due to limitations in spatial resolution [37]. Comparison of number densities of small particles was therefore only performed for measurements at similar low voltages (below 6 kV and within a 1 kV range).

Table 4 shows that the presence of large elongated particles (>15 nm) after prolonged PB led to a lower apparent overall solute concentration relative to the bulk alloy composition (decrease of 0.08–0.12 at% for Mg and 0.15–0.20 at% for Si). This is thought to occur due to failure in the detection of multiple ions evaporating per pulse from these larger precipitates [37], [38], [39], [40]. Relatively more Si atoms were undetected than Mg atoms. When the losses of Si and Mg were taken into account, the average Mg/Si ratios of large elongated particles (>15 nm) were estimated to be in the range of 0.90 and 1.05 as shown in Table 5. This is close to the Mg/Si ratio of Mg5Si6, but lower than the values of 1.2–1.4 found by APT without taking the losses of Mg and Si into account. In the other sections, only the unadjusted particle Mg/Si ratios as measured by APT are given. The average particle Mg/Si ratios of datasets containing large elongated particles (>15 nm) are therefore overestimated by 20–40% in this section. It should also be noted that local aberration effects due to ion trajectory differences between different phases [33] increase the apparently-measured width of the interface between matrix and precipitates by 2–3 nm. Only the apparent widths are given in the subsequent sections.

Table 4.

Lower detected overall solute concentration by LEAP after 30 min or 18 h ageing at 453 K.

Mg Si
Average overall Mg and Si concentrations of measurements after NA or PA (at%)a 0.46±0.01 0.95±0.01
Overall Mg and Si concentrations of measurement after 30 min PBb (at%) 0.36±0.01 0.77±0.01
Loss of Mg and Si atoms in 30 min PB measurement (at%) 0.10 0.18
Overall Mg and Si concentrations of measurement after 18 h PBb (at%) 0.34±0.01 0.79±0.01
Loss of Mg and Si atoms in 18 h PB measurement (at%) 0.12 0.16
a

The average overall composition of 10 LEAP measurements after NA or PA. These datasets only contain clusters (particles containing fewer than 70 solute atoms).

b

Mainly elongated precipitates longer than 15 nm are present.

Table 5.

Estimation of precipitate Mg/Si ratio compensating for the loss of Si and Mg atoms during APT analysis.

Mg Si
Average overall Mg and Si concentrations of measurements after NA or PA (at%)a 0.46±0.01 0.95±0.01
Matrix Mg and Si concentrations of measurement after 30 min PBb (at%) 0.16±0.01 0.62±0.01
Estimated amount of solutes in elongated precipitates in 30 min PB measurement (at%) 0.30 0.33
Estimated average precipitate Mg/Si ratio 0.91
Average precipitate Mg/Si ratio as measured by LEAP 1.35
Matrix Mg and Si concentrations of measurement after 18 h PBb (at%) 0.09±0.01 0.60±0.01
Estimated amount of solutes in elongated precipitates in 18 h PB measurement (at%) 0.37 0.35
Estimated average precipitate Mg/Si ratio 1.06
Average precipitate Mg/Si ratio as measured by LEAP 1.35
a

The average overall composition of 10 LEAP measurements after NA or PA. These datasets only contain clusters (particles containing fewer than 70 solute atoms).

b

Mainly elongated precipitates longer than 12 nm are present.

To estimate the relative Al content in particles, composition profiles of elongated particles were obtained by plotting a proximity histogram (proxigram) from isoconcentration surfaces defined so as to mark the matrix/particle interface [33]. An isosurface is a 3-D contour surface passing through all points of a particular solute concentration range. A 6–8 at% (Mg+Si) concentration value was used for large particles (average length >15 nm) and a 4–6 at% value for smaller particles (average length <15 nm). The delocalisation (smoothing) parameter was set at 3–5 nm.

1.3. Prolonged ageing

1.3.1. Prolonged PB

The data shown here are complimentary to the results discussed in the accompanying Acta Materialia paper [1]. Distributions of the diameter and the detected precipitate Mg/Si ratio against the precipitate length are plotted in Fig. 1. From the APT analysis observations, there is no clear distinction between the successive phases, the change in precipitate length being continuous. The diameter increases from 3–4 nm for short-elongated precipitates to 5–6.5 nm for precipitates longer than 15 nm. The diameter of the precipitates increases only slightly (by <1 nm) as they grow longer than 15 nm, demonstrating that the large needle-shaped precipitates hardly coarsen laterally with increasing ageing time.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Measured diameters of precipitates plotted against precipitate length after various PB treatments at 453 K.

Ageing for 580 h at 453 K gives precipitates of 100–200 nm in length as shown in the TEM image in Fig. 2. APT measurements show that these precipitates are lath-shaped. The precipitates have probably transformed into B′, which has a proposed composition of Mg9Al3Si7 [30], [41]. The proposed B′ Mg/Si ratio of 1.29 is close to that found here after adjusting for the preferential loss of solutes (1.55–1.75 as measured by APT to 1.0–1.4 after adjustment for loss of Mg and Si atoms).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

TEM image of APT specimen heat treated for 1 min at room temperature and 580 h at 453 K. The yellow arrows indicate elongated B′ precipitates. The inset is a LAR-3DAP measurement of the same material at the same magnification, but not the same area of analysis.

After prolonged PB, the solute matrix concentrations decrease to below 0.05 at%. Fig. 3 shows that extrapolations of solid solubility limits at temperatures above 498 K known from the literature [42] coincide with the measured matrix concentrations after 580 h PB. This demonstrates that the solid solubility limits of Mg and Si are below 0.05 at% at 453 K in ternary Al–Mg–Si, meaning that 0.48 at% Mg and 0.89 at% Si have come out of solution. The B′ precipitates are Mg-rich, showing that 0.4–0.6 at% Si is not accounted for. Consequently, it is possible that large Si-rich precipitates have formed, as has been reported to occur in excess-Si Al–Mg–Si alloys after prolonged ageing at 453 K (>100 h) [43], [44]. The Si diffusion distances at equilibrium vacancy concentrations are estimated to be above 700 nm for 400 h ageing at 453 K [45]. Although large Si precipitates have not been observed in the APT measurements, it is possible that they were formed during prolonged PB as the longest experimental run was only 60 nm wide and 350 nm in length.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Solid solubility limits (in at%) of Mg and Si in aluminium in Al–Mg–Si system. Values on the dark blue and pink lines are from [42].

1.3.2. Prolonged NA

The data shown here are complimentary to the results discussed in the accompanying Acta Materialia paper [1]. Detailed APT data after prolonged NA by LAR-3DAP are shown in Table 6 and Fig. 4. After 11 or 48 weeks of NA, the cluster number density is stable. The clusters grow in size from 1 week to 11 weeks NA. The average cluster Mg/Si ratio and cluster Mg/Si ratio distributions do not change.

Table 6.

LAR-3DAP measurements after 1, 11 or 48 week NA.

NA time Average cluster size (number of solute atoms) Cluster Mg/Si ratioa Cluster number density (×1022/m3) Nmin=10 Cluster number density (×1022/m3) Nmin=5
1 week NA 13.9±0.5 0.86±0.03 120±13 400±50
11 week NA 17.8±0.9 0.87±0.02 341±21 490±50
48 week NA 16.4±0.8 0.95±0.03 223±19 400±50
a

The variations in cluster chemistry are assumed to be mainly caused by the differences in measured overall composition.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Cluster number densities for different cluster size ranges after 1, 11 or 48 weeks NA as measured by LAR-3DAP. The cluster sizes were obtained using a Nmin of 10 for cluster analysis.

1.3.3. Prolonged PA

APT data after prolonged PA by LAR-3DAP are shown in Table 7 and Fig. 5, Fig. 6. Clusters continue to increase in size from 2 h to 1 week PA. After 2 h PA, the cluster number density as measured by LAR-3DAP hardly increases with PA time (<25%), but the average cluster size does by 60% from 2 h to 1 week PA.

Table 7.

LAR-3DAP measurements after 2 or 10 h or 1 week PA with and without a spike.

Heat treatment Average particle size (number of solute atoms) Particle Mg/Si ratioa Clusterb number density (×1022/m3) Precipitateb number density (×1022/m3)
Without spike
2 h PA 18.2±2.4 1.02±0.05 186±30
10 h PA 22.0±0.7 0.93±0.02 184±11 9±2
1 week PA 28.6±2.1 1.06±0.03 197±18 24±6
With spike
Spike 2 h PA 1 week NA 26.7±1.6 0.98±0.03 184±18 29±8
Spike 10 h PA 1 week NA 34.2±2.0 1.11±0.02 108±10 17±4
Spike 1 week PA 45.6±1.8 1.19±0.01 116±10 72±7
a

The variations in cluster chemistry are assumed to be mainly caused by the differences in measured overall composition.

b

Precipitates are particles containing more than 50 solute atoms as measured by LAR-3DAP, clusters contain fewer than 50 solute atoms (Nmin was 10 for particle analysis).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Fraction of clusters plotted against cluster Mg/Si ratio ranges after 2 or 10 h or 1 week PA as measured by LAR-3DAP.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Particle number densities for different particle size ranges after 2 or 10 h or 1 week PA as measured by LAR-3DAP. A Nmin of 10 was used for particle analysis.

1.3.4. Spike and prolonged pre-ageing

APT measurements show that application of a spike (10 s at 453 K) before PA leads to larger clusters with similar Mg/Si ratios to those formed without a spike. Similar to the results by LEAP as discussed in the accompanying Acta Materialia paper [1], LAR-3DAP measurements show that application of a spike before PA leads to larger clusters with similar Mg/Si ratios to those formed without a spike, as illustrated in Table 7 and Fig. 7, Fig. 8. After 1 week PA, clusters are identical in size, morphology and chemistry to the spheroidal precipitates present after PB, as shown in Fig. 9, Fig. 10. Therefore, applying a spike has two effects: it increases the number density of larger clusters which are close in size and chemistry to spheroidal precipitates and it decreases the number density of smaller ones.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Particle number densities for different particle size ranges after a spike and 2 or 10 h or 1 week PA as measured by LAR-3DAP. A Nmin of 10 was used for particle analysis.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Fraction of clusters plotted against cluster Mg/Si ratio ranges after a spike followed by 2 or 10 h or 1 week PA as measured by LAR-3DAP.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Particle Mg/Si ratio or number of detected solute atoms in particles plotted against particle length after a spike and 1 week PA (blue) or 10 min NA and 30 min PB (pink) as measured by LAR-3DAP. Only particles consisting of 50 solute atoms or more are taken into account. The particle sizes and compositions were obtained using a Nmin of 10 for particle analysis.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Fraction of particles containing fewer than 150 solute atoms plotted against particle Mg/Si ratio ranges after a spike followed by 1 week PA or after 10 min NA and a 30 min PB as measured by LAR-3DAP.

1.3.5. Clusters after PB

The effects of ageing at 453 K after NA and PA on clusters and precipitation is discussed in the accompanying Acta Materialia paper [1]. Table 8 summarises the change in number densities of clusters and precipitates after different heat treatments. Not every cluster formed during PA grows into an elongated precipitate upon subsequent PB. For 10 h PA, the decrease in number density of small clusters is ~90×1022/m3 during PB, whereas the increase in precipitates containing more than 70 solute atoms is only 20–30×1022/m3. Clusters present after a 10 or 30 min PB have a Mg/Si ratio of 0.9–1.2, which is comparable to that of clusters present after PA before the PB and to that of precipitates formed during the PB.

Table 8.

Number densities of particles containing 10–20, 20–40, 40–70 and 70+ solute atoms as measured by LEAP after different heat treatments using a Nmin of 10.

Heat treatment Number density clusters of 10–20 solute atoms (×1022/m3) Number density clusters of 20–40 solute atoms (×1022/m3) Number density clusters of 40–70 solute atoms (×1022/m3) Number density precipitates 70+ solute atoms (×1022/m3)
1 min NA
10 min PBa 34±3 22±3 10±2 26±2
30 min PB 4.7±0.7 1.2±0.4 0.7±0.3 13±1
1 week NA
Before PB 101±6 15±2
30 min PB 85±5 30±3 2±1 1±1
10 h PA 1 week NA
Before PB 85±12 73±11 13±5 1±1
10 min PB 45±4 26±3 17±3 24±3
30 min PB 45±3 21±2 9±1 30±2
Spike 2 h PA 1 week NA
Before PB 59±5 26±3 12±2 3±1
30 min PB 24±2 12±2 9±1 27±3
a

This was measured at 1–2 kV lower voltage than the other measurement.

1.4. Additional data after multiple heat treatments

1.4.1. Effect of pre-ageing on the paint-bake

The data shown here is complimentary to the results discussed in the accompanying Acta Materialia paper [1]. When PA is given prior to NA, the change in hardness during 1 week NA is significantly reduced. The hardness is 55–60 Hv after 2 h PA and increases to 60–67 Hv after 1 week NA. 10 h PA leads to a hardness of 67±1 Hv, which hardly increases during 1 week of NA.

PA partially mitigates the deleterious effects of subsequent 1 week NA as illustrated in the hardness plots in Fig. 11. The hardness increases by approximately 30 Hv after 30 min PB when PA is given, which is lower than the 64±3 Hv increase when the PB is given 1 min after the SSHT, but better than the PB response after NA without PA. 1 week NA after 2 h PA has little effect on the PB response, i.e. hardly any difference is seen in the hardness curves after 2 h PA with and without 1 week NA. Increasing the PA time to 10 h improves the hardening response by 5–10 Hv during the first 20 min of PB.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Change in hardness with PB time after 1 min NA or 1 week NA when no PA is given or when 2 or 10 h of PA is given prior to NA.

When PA is given, the PB response is slower than when the PB is given directly after the SSHT. After 10 min PB, the microstructure is comparable due to the fact that clusters, precursors to the elongated precipitates, are already present when PA is given. However, precipitates grow considerably faster between 10 and 30 min PB when the NA time is restricted to 1 min as shown in Fig. 12.

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

Number density of precipitates for different precipitate lengths after 1 min NA and a 10 or 30 min PB; 2 h PA 1 week NA and a 10 or 30 min PB; or 10 h PA 1 week NA and a 10 or 30 min PB.

1.5. Calculation of the nucleation barrier after NA

After 100 min NA, the percentage of total Mg atoms of the alloy in clusters is limited to 5–6%. It should be noted that the percentage of Mg in clusters might be underestimated as some clusters are too small to be detected by APT. If we make a conservative estimate that we only measure a third of the smallest clusters then 15–18% of Mg should be in clusters, corresponding to a decrease in the Mg concentration of ~0.08 at%. This decrease in matrix Mg concentration increases the nucleation barrier (ΔG*). ΔG* for spherical particles, according to the classical nucleation and growth theory [46], is estimated by: ΔG*=16πγ3/3Δg2, where Δg is the driving force per unit volume for precipitation, γ the specific interfacial energy between the matrix and cluster or precipitate (between 0.1 and 0.45 J/m2 for β″ [47]). Δg can be estimated (assuming the strain energy per unit volume is negligible) by: Δggchem=−(kBT/Vβ)ln(C/Ceq), where kB is the Boltzmann constant (J/K), T the temperature (K), Vβ the atomic volume of phase β (m3) and Ceq the equilibrium matrix solute concentration in the solvent. A Vβ for the β″ phase is used for all calculations. Table 9 shows the equilibrium matrix solute concentrations for different phases determined by APT in this work. These concentrations have been used to calculate Δg and ΔG* for clusters with a chemistry close to that of elongated precipitates (PB clusters) as shown in Table 10. Two values for γ, 0.15 or 0.3 J/m2, have been investigated. The solute concentration decrease in the matrix after 100 min NA leads to an increase of ~20% for ΔG* for clusters acting as precursors to the elongated phases. The relative change in nucleation rate is calculated by dividing exp(−ΔG*/kBT) after 100 min NA by that before NA. For both γ values, ΔG* increases after 100 min NA leading to a decrease in the nucleation rate. It should be noted that the values for ΔG* are reasonable at 0.70 or 0.85 eV when γ is 0.15 J/m2. This value is comparable to 0.75–0.90 eV (72–87 kJ/mol) as reported by Banhart et al. [48] based positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy (PALS) measurements. The calculations show that the relatively small changes in matrix solute concentrations after 100 min NA lead to a significant reduction of nucleation of clusters, which develop into larger precipitates.

Table 9.

Matrix solute concentrations below which certain phases are not observed at 453 K.

Phase Matrix Mg concentrations (at%) Matrix Si concentration (at%)
NA clustersa 0.49±0.02 0.92±0.03
PA/PB clusters 0.080±0.002 0.58±0.02
β″ 0.043±0.003 0.046±0.006
a

Clusters dissolve or change chemistry and size upon ageing at 453 K.

Table 10.

Estimation of nucleation barriers and the decrease in nucleation rate after 100 min NA.

γ (J/m2) Δgchem. (J/m3) ΔG* (J) Exp(ΔG*/kT) Exp(ΔG*/kT)100 minNA/Exp(ΔG*/kT)noNA
Clusters formed during PB 0.3 Before NA −7.1×108 9.0×10−19 3.4×10−63 1.4×10−13
100 min NA −6.5×108 1.1×10−18 4.9×10−76
0.15 Before NA −7.1×108 1.1×10−19 1.6×10−8 2.5×10−2
100 min NA −6.5×108 1.4×10−19 3.9×10−10

Acknowledgements

This research was carried out under project number MC4.04191 for the Materials Innovation Institute in the Netherlands (www.m2i.nl), using the APT facilities at Oxford University. LEAP, LAR-3DAP, PoSAP and IVAS are trademarks of Cameca Instruments Inc.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2015.09.045.

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Zandbergen M.W., Xu Q., Cerezo A., Smith G.D.W. Study of precipitation in Al–Mg–Si alloys by atom probe tomography I: microstructural changes as a function of ageing temperature. Acta Mater. 2015;101:136–148. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Edwards G.A., Stiller K., Dunlop G.L., Couper M.J. The precipitation sequence in Al–Mg–Si alloy. Acta Mater. 1998;46:3893–3904. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Murayama M., Hono K., Saga M., Kikuchi M. Atom probe studies on the early stages of precipitation in Al–Mg–Si alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 1998;250:127–132. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Murayama M., Hono K. Pre-precipitate clusters and precipitation processes in Al–Mg–Si alloys. Acta Mater. 1999;47:1537–1548. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Murayama M., Hono K., Miao W.F., Laughlin D.E. The effect of Cu additions on the precipitation kinetics in an Al–Mg–Si alloy with excess Si. Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 2001;32:239–246. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ringer S.P., Hono K. Microstructural evolution and age hardening in aluminium alloys: atom probe field-ion microscopy and transmission electron microscopy studies. Mater. Charact. 2000;44:101–131. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Serizawa A., Hirosawa S., Sato T. Three-dimensional atom probe characterization of nanoclusters responsible for multistep aging behavior of an Al–Mg–Si alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 2008;39:243–251. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Buha J., Lumley R.N., Crosky A.G., Hono K. Secondary precipitation in an Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloy. Acta Mater. 2007;55:3015–3024. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Buha J., Lumley R.N., Crosky A.G. Microstructural development and mechanical properties of interrupted aged Al–Mg–Si–Cu alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 2006;37:3119–3130. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.De Geuser F., Lefebvre W., Blavette D. 3D atom probe study of solute atoms clustering during natural ageing and pre-ageing of an Al–Mg–Si alloy. Philos. Mag. Lett. 2006;86:227–234. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Serizawa A., Sato T., Poole W.J. The characterization of dislocation–nanocluster interactions in Al–Mg–Si(–Cu/Ag) alloys. Philos. Mag. Lett. 2009;90:279–287. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Morley A.I., Zandbergen M.W., Cerezo A., Smith G.D.W. The effect of pre-ageing and addition of copper on the precipitation behaviour in Al–Mg–Si alloys. Mater. Sci. Forum. 2006;519–521:543–548. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hirosawa S., Sato T. Nano-scale clusters formed in the early stage of phase decomposition of Al–Mg–Si alloys. Mater. Sci. Forum. 2005;475–479:357–360. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Torsæter M., Hasting H.S., Lefebvre W., Marioara C.D., Walmsley J.C., Andersen S.J., Holmestad R. The influence of composition and natural aging on clustering during pre-aging in Al–Mg–Si alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 2010;108:073527–073529. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sha G., Möller H., Stumpf W.E., Xia. J.H., Govender G., Ringer S.P. Solute nanostructures and their strengthening effects in Al–7Si–0.6 Mg alloy F357. Acta Mater. 2012;60:692–701. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wenner S., Nishimura K., Matsuda K., Matsuzaki T., Tomono D., Pratt F., Marioara C.D., Holmestad R. Clustering and vacancy behavior in high- and low-solute Al–Mg–-Si alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 2014;45:5777–5785. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen J.H., Costan E., van Huis M.A., Xu Q., Zandbergen H.W. Atomic pillar-based nanoprecipitates strengthen AlMgSi alloys. Science. 2006;312:416–419. doi: 10.1126/science.1124199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ravi C., Wolverton C. First-principles study of crystal structure and stability of Al–Mg–Si–(Cu) precipitates. Acta Mater. 2004;52:4213–4227. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.van Huis M.A., Chen J.H., Sluiter M.H.F., Zandbergen H.W. Phase stability and structural features of matrix-embedded hardening precipitates in Al–Mg–Si alloys in the early stages of evolution. Acta Mater. 2007;55:2183–2199. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.van Huis M.A., Chen J.H., Zandbergen H.W., Sluiter M.H.F. Phase stability and structural relations of nanometer-sized, matrix-embedded precipitate phases in Al–Mg–Si alloys in the late stages of evolution. Acta Mater. 2006;54:2945–2955. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Matsuda K., Gamada H., Fujii K., Uetani Y., Sato T., Kamio A., Ikeno S. High resolution electron microscopy on the structure of Guinier–Preston zones in an Al-1.6 mass Pct Mg2Si alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 1998;29:1161–1167. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Thomas G. The ageing characteristics of aluminum alloys-electron transmission studies of Al–Mg–Si alloys. J. Inst. Metals. 1961;90:57–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Marioara C.D., Andersen S.J., Jansen J., Zandbergen H.W. Atomic model for GP-zones in a 6082 Al–Mg–Si system. Acta Mater. 2001;49:321–328. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Andersen S.J., Zandbergen H.W., Jansen J., Traeholt C., Tundal U., Reiso O. The crystal structure of the β″ phase in Al–Mg–Si alloys. Acta Mater. 1998;46:3283–3298. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Derlet P.M., Andersen S.J., Marioara C.D., Froseth A. A first-principles study of the β″-phase in Al–Mg–Si alloys. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2002;14:4011–4024. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zandbergen H.W., Andersen S.J., Jansen J. Structure determination of Mg5Si6 particles in Al by dynamic electron diffraction studies. Science. 1997;277:1221–1225. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vissers R., van Huis M.A., Jansen J., Zandbergen H.W., Marioara C.D., Andersen S.J. The crystal structure of the β′ phase in Al–Mg–Si alloys. Acta Mater. 2007;55:3815–3823. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Froseth A.G., Hoier R., Derlet P.M., Andersen S.J., Marioara C.D. Bonding in MgSi and Al–Mg–Si compounds relevant to Al–Mg–Si alloys. Phys. Rev. B. 2003;67:224106–224109. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Andersen S.J., Marioara C.D., Vissers R., Froseth A., Zandbergen H.W. The structural relation between precipitates in Al–Mg–Si alloys, the Al-matrix and diamond silicon, with emphasis on the trigonal phase U1-MgAl2Si2. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2007;444:157–169. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dumolt S., Laughlin D., Williams J. Formation of a modified 13″ phase in aluminum alloy 6061. Scr. Metall. 1984;18:1347–1350. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Geisler A.H., Hill J.K. Analyses and interpretations of X-ray diffraction effects in patterns of aged alloys. Acta Crystallogr. 1948;1:238–252. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jacobs M.H. The structure of the metastable precipitates formed during ageing of an Al–Mg–Si alloy. Philos. Mag. 1972;26:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Miller M.K. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publisher; New York: 2000. Atom Probe Tomography: Analysis at the Atomic Level. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kelly T.F., Camus P.P., Larson D.J., Holzman L.M., Bajikar S.S. On the many advantages of local-electrode atom probes. Ultramicroscopy. 1996;62:29–42. doi: 10.1016/0304-3991(95)00086-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kelly T.F., Larson D.J. Local electrode atom probes. Mater. Charact. 2000;44:59–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.P. Panayi, U.K. Patent Application No. GB0509638.3, Nov 15, 2006.
  • 37.Zandbergen M.W. University of Oxford; 2009. Study of Early-Stage Precipitation in Al–Mg–Si(–Cu) Alloys by 3D Atom Probe (DPhil thesis) [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Da Costa G., Vurpillot F., Bostel A., Bouet M., Deconihout B. Design of a delay-line-position-sensitive detector with improved performance. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2005;76:013304–0133048. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hasting H.K., Lefebvre W., Marioara C.D., Walmsley J.C., Andersen S.J., Holmestad R., Danoix F. Comparative study of the β″-phase in a 6xxx Al alloy by 3DAP and HRTEM. Surf. Interface Anal. 2007;39:189–194. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lefebvre W., Danoix F., Da Costa G., De Geuser F., Hallem H., Deschamps A., Dumont M. 3DAP measurements of Al content in different types of precipitates in aluminium alloys. Surf. Interface Anal. 2007;39:206. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ravi C., Wolverton C. First-principles study of crystal structure and stability of Al–Mg–Si–(Cu) precipitates. Acta Mater. 2004;52:4213–4227. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Belov N., Eskin D., Aksenov A. First ed. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2005. Multicomponent Phase Diagrams: Applications for Commercial Aluminium Alloys. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Marioara C.D., Andersen S.J., Zandbergen H.W., Holmestad R. The influence of alloy composition on precipitates of the Al–Mg–Si system. Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 2005;36:691–702. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhen L., Fei W.D., Kang S.B., Kim H.W. Precipitation behaviour of Al–Mg–Si alloys with high silicon content. J. Mater. Sci. 1997;32:1895–1902. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Du Y., Chang Y.A., Huang B.Y., Gong W.P., Jin Z.P., Xu H.H., Yuan Z.H., Liu Y., He Y.H., Xie F.Y. Diffusion coefficients of some solutes in fcc and liquid Al: critical evaluation and correlation. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2003;363:140–151. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Russell K.C. Nucleation in solids: the induction and steady state effects. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1980;13:205–318. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang Y., Liu Z.K., Chen L.Q., Wolverton C. First-principles calculations of β″-Mg5Si6/α-Al interfaces. Acta Mater. 2007;55:5934–5947. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Banhart J., Lay M.D.H., Chang C.S.T., Hill A.J. Kinetics of natural aging in Al–Mg–Si alloys studied by positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B. 2011;83:014101–014105. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES