Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2016 Feb 19;7:206–215. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.02.030

Data defining markers of human neural stem cell lineage potential

Lotta E Oikari 1, Rachel K Okolicsanyi 1, Lyn R Griffiths 1, Larisa M Haupt 1,
PMCID: PMC4773572  PMID: 26958640

Abstract

Neural stem cells (NSCs) and neural progenitor cells (NPCs) are self-renewing and multipotent cells, however, NPCs are considered to be more lineage-restricted with a reduced self-renewing capacity. We present data comparing the expression of 21 markers encompassing pluripotency, self-renewal (NSC) as well as neuronal and glial (astrocyte and oligodendrocyte) lineage specification and 28 extracellular proteoglycan (PG) genes and their regulatory enzymes between embryonic stem cell (ESC)-derived human NSCs (hNSC H9 cells, Thermo Fisher) and human cortex-derived normal human NPCs (nhNPCs, Lonza). The data demonstrates expression differences of multiple lineage and proteoglycan-associated genes between hNSC H9 cells and nhNPCs. Data interpretation of markers and proteoglycans defining NSC and neural cell lineage characterisation can be found in “Cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans as novel markers of human neural stem cell fate determination” (Oikari et al. 2015) [1].

Keywords: Neural stem cells, Neural progenitor cells, Proteoglycans, Lineage, Characterisation


Specifications Table

Subject area Cell biology
More specific subject area Human neural stem cell (hNSC) and human neural progenitor cell (hNPC) marker characterisation
Type of data Text file, graphs and immunofluorescence images
How data was acquired in vitro culture/expansion and phase-contrast fluorescence microscopy data for phenotypic analysis was obtained on an Olympus IX81 inverted fluorescent microscope via Volocity Imaging package; raw Q-PCR data was obtained on Applied Biosystems 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR system
Data format Analysed
Experimental factors hNSC H9 and nhNP cells were cultured under basal medium conditions
Experimental features hNSC H9 cells (Thermo Fisher) were cultured as a monolayer and nhNP cells (Lonza) were cultured as neurospheres in standard maintenance medium provided by the manufacturer. RNA was harvested and transcribed to cDNA and gene expression of a panel of 49 genes examined by Q-PCR. Specific neural cell lineage markers were further detected through immunofluorescence (IF)
Data source location Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland Australia
Data accessibility Data is provided in this article
  • The data provides an extensive panel of markers for better characterisation of human NSCs and NPCs.

  • The data demonstrates significant and specific differences in expression of pluripotency, NSC self-renewal and neural cell lineage markers between hNSCs and hNPCs.

  • The marker profile data could be used to identify and differentiate between the two cell types to improve their efficacy in research or therapeutic applications.

  • The data provides information on the proteoglycan profile of human NSCs and NPCs providing potential new additional markers defining lineage progression of NSCs to NPCs.

1. Data

We compared the expression of 49 selected genes between human NSCs (hESC-derived hNSC H9 cells, Thermo Fisher) and normal human progenitor cells (nhNPCs, Lonza) following short-term culture under basal growth conditions. Q-PCR data was obtained for pluripotency genes, NSC, neuronal, astrocyte and oligodendrocyte lineage defining genes (n=21; Table 1.) (Fig. 1) with several of these markers also detected through immunofluorescence (IF) (Fig. 2) using specific antibodies (Table 3). In addition, Q-PCR data was obtained for 28 heparan and chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan biosynthesis enzymes and core protein genes (Table 2) ubiquitous to the neural niche [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] in hNSC H9 cells and nhNPCs (Fig. 3, Fig. 4). The data presented provides information on self-renewal and multilineage potential as well as proteoglycan expression differences between the two neural stem/progenitor cell types.

Table 1.

Primer sequences of NSC and neural lineage related genes.

Gene Symbol Forward primer Reverse primer RefSeq Ref
CD44 CD44 AGCAACTGAGACAGCAACCA AGACGTACCAGCCATTTGTGT NM_000610.3
Doublecortin Dcx TATGCGCCGAAGCAAGTCTC TACAGGTCCTTGTGCTTCCG NM_178152.2
Enolase 2 ENO2 TGCACAGGCCAGATCAAGAC ACAGCACACTGGGATTACGG NM_001975.2
Forkhead box A2 FOXA2 CTGGTCGTTTGTTGTGGCTG GGAGGAGTAGCCCTCGG NM_021784.4
Galactosylceramidase GalC GCCAAGCGTTACCATGATTT TTTCACTCGCTGGAGACCTT NM_001201402.1 [8]
Glial fibrillary acidic protein GFAP GAGGTTGAGAGGGACAATCTGG GTGGCTTCATCTGCTTCCTGTC NM_002055.4
Human telomerase hTERT GACGTGGAAGATGAGCGTG GACGACGTACACACTCATC NM_001193376.1 NM_198253.2 [9]
Microtubule associated protein 2 MAP2 GACTGCAGCTCTGCCTTTAG AAGTAAATCTTCCTCCACTGTGAC NM_002374.3
Mushahi I MSI I TGACCAAGAGATCCAGGGGT CGATTGCGCCAGCACTTTAT NM_002442.3
Nanog homeobox NANOG ACCTCAGCTACAAACAGGTGAA AAAGGCTGGGGTAGGTAGGT NM_024865.2
Nestin NES CTCAGCTTTCAGGACCCCAA GTCTCAAGGGTAGCAGGCAA NM_006617.1
Neurofilament M NEFM TGCAGTCCAAGAGCATCGAG GGATGGTGTCCTGGTAGCTG NM_005382.2
Neurogenin 2 NEUROG2 AGAGCCAACTAAGATGTTCGTCA CGATCCGAGCAGCACTAACA NM_024019.3
Oligodendrocyte transcription factor 1 OLIG1 GTCATCCTGCCCTACTCAGC CTGCCCAGCAGTAGGATGTAG NM_138983.2 [8]
Oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2 OLIG2 GACAAGCTAGGAGGCAGTGG CGGCTCTGTCATTTGCTTCT NM_005806.3 [8]
POU Class 5 homeobox 1 (OCT3/4) OCT3/4 ATCTTCAGGAGATATGCAAAGCAGA TGATCTGCTGCAGTGTGGGT NM_002701.4
SRY box 1 SOX1 CAACCAGGACCGGGTCAAAC CCTCGGACATGACCTTCCAC NM_005986.2
SRY box 2 SOX2 CCACCTACAGCATGTCCTACTCG GGGAGGAAGAGGTAACCACAGG NM_003106.3 [10]
S100 Calcium binding protein B S100B TTCTGGAAGGGAGGGAGACA CTCCTGCTCTTTGATTTCCTCT NM_006272.2
Vimentin VIM GGACCAGCTAACCAACGACAAA CGCATTGTCAACATCCTGTCTG NM_003380.3
βIII tubulin TUBB3 GGCCAAGTTCTGGGAAGTCAT CTCGAGGCACGTACTTGTGA NM_06086.3

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Q-PCR analysis of pluripotency, NSC self-renewal, neuronal and glial lineage marker genes in hNSC H9 cells and nhNPCs. Relative expression in hNSC H9 cells and nhNPCs of: (A) pluripotency markers; (B) NSC self-renewal markers; (C) neuronal lineage defining markers; and (D) glial lineage defining markers. Relative expression normalised to 18 S, error bars=SD, statistical significance: p<0.05, ⁎⁎p<0.01, ⁎⁎⁎p<0.001.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Phenotypic and IF examination of NSC and neural lineage markers in hNSC H9 cells and nhNPCs. Phase-contrast images (20× magnification with 10× magnification inset, scale bar 130 μM) of: (A) hNSC H9 cells at P3 and (B) nhNPCs attached to surface (CC2 chamber slide) during expansion. Immunofluorescence (20× magnification, scale bar 130 μM) in hNSC H9 P3 cells and nhNPCs of stemness and lineage markers: (C) NSC self-renewal markers Nestin (FITC/green) and SOX2 (Cy3/yellow); and (D) neuronal marker MAP2 (FITC/green), astrocyte marker GFAP (Cy3/yellow) and oligodendrocyte marker O1 (AF594/red).

Table 3.

Antibodies used for immunofluorescence.

Primary antibodies Dilution Company (Cat#)
Anti-Nestin (Mouse IgG) 1:200 Abcam (ab22035)
Anti-SOX2 (Rabbit IgG) 1:1000 Millipore (2003600)
Anti-MAP2 (Mouse IgG) 1:200 Abcam (ab36447)
Anti-GFAP (Rabbit IgG) 1:250 Abcam (ab7260)
Anti-O1 (Mouse IgM) 1:500 Abcam (ab34164)
Isotype Controls Dilution Company (Cat#)
Mouse IgG 1:250 Millipore (PP54-100UG)
Rabbit IgG 1:250 Millipore (PP64-100UG)
Mouse IgM 1:500 Millipore (2003599)
Secondary antibodies Dilution Company (Cat#)
Donkey Anti-Mouse IgG (FITC, green) 1:250 Millipore (AP192F)
Donkey Anti-Rabbit (H+L) (Cy3, yellow) 1:250 Millipore (AP182C)
Donkey Anti-Mouse IgM (AlexaFluor 594, red) 1:500 Jackson Immunoresearch (#715-585-020)

Table 2.

Primer sequences of proteoglycan associated genes.

Gene Symbol Forward primer Reverse primer RefSeq Ref
Aggrecan AGG TGCATTCCACGAAGCTAACCTT CGCCTCGCCTTCTTGAAATGT NM_001135
C5-Epimerase C5-EP AGCTGTCAAGCCAACCAAAATAA CTTACTAGCCAATCACTAGCAGCAA AY635582
carbohydrate (chondroitin 6) sulfotransferase 3 CHST3 GGTTTTTGTGGTGATAGTTTTTGTCTT GCTGGGTCGGTGCTGTTG NM_004273
carbohydrate (chondroitin 4) sulfotransferase 11 CHST11 CTGCTGGAAGTGATGAGGATGA GATGTCCACACCAAAGGGATTC NM_018413
Decorin DCN TCCTGATGACCGCGACTT GAGTTGTGTCAGGGGGAAGA NM_001920.3
Exostose 1 EXT1 TGACAGAGACAACACCGAGTATGA GCAAAGCCTCCAGGAATCTGAAG NM_000127.2
Exostose 2 EXT2 CAGTCAATTAAAGCCATTGCCCTG GGGATCAGCGGGAGGAAGAG NM_000401
Glypican 1 GPC1 GGACATCACCAAGCCGGACAT GTCCACGTCGTTGCCGTTGT NM_002081
Glypican 2 GPC2 TGATCAGCCCCAACAGAGAAA CCACTTCCAACTTCCTTCAAACC NM_152742
Glypican 3 GPC3 GATACAGCCAAAAGGCAGCAA GCCCTTCATTTTCAGCTCATG NM_004484.
Glypican 4 GPC4 GGTGAACTCCCAGTACCACTTTACA GCTTCAGCTGCTCCGTATACTTG NM_001448
Glypican 5 GPC5 GCTCACCTCAATGGACAAAAATT GTTGGCAAGCGTCTCTTCACT NM_004466
Glypican 6 GPC6 CAGCCTGTGTTAAGCTGAGGTTT GATGTGTGTGCGTGGAGGTATGT NM_005708.
Heparanase HPSE TCACCATTGACGCCAACCT CTTTGCAGAACCCAGGAGGAT NM_006665.5
Heparan sulphate 2-O sulfotransferase 1 HS2ST1 TCCCGCTCGAAGCTAGAAAG CGAGGGCCATCCATTGTATG NM_012262
Heparan sulphate 6-O sulfotransferase 1 HS6ST1 AGCGGACGTTCAACCTCAAGT GCGTAGTCGTACAGCTGCATGT NM_004807
Heparan sulphate 6-O sulfotransferase 2 HS6ST2 TCTGGAAAGTGCCAAGTCAAATC ATGGCGAAATAAAGTTCATGTTGAA NM_147175
Heparan sulphate 6-O sulfotransferase 3 HS6ST3 ACATCACGCGGGCTTCTAACGT GGCGGTCCCTCTGGTGCTCTA NM_153456
N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase 1 NDST1 TGGTCTTGGATGGCAAACTG CGCCAAGGTTTTGTGGTAGTC NM_001543
N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase 2 NDST2 CCTATTTGAAAAAAGTGCCACCTACT GCAGGGTTGGTGAGCACTGT NM_003635
N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase 3 NDST3 ACCCTTCAGACCGAGCATACTC CCCGGGACCAAACATCTCTT NM_004784
N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase 4 NDST4 ATAAAGCCAATGAGAACAGCTTACC GGTAATATGCAGCAAAGGAGATTGA NM_022569
Perlecan PER TGGACACATTCGTACCTTTCTGA CCTCGGACACCTCTCGAAACT NM_005529
Syndecan 1 SDC1 CTGGGCTGGAATCAGGAATATTT CCCATTGGATTAAGTAGAGTTTTGC BC008765.2
Syndecan 2 SDC2 AGCTGACAACATCTCGACCACTT GCGTCGTGGTTTCCACTTTT NM_002998.3
Syndecan 3 SDC3 CTTGGTCACACTGCTCATCTATCG GCATAGAACTCCTCCTGCTTGTC AF248634
Syndecan 4 SDC4 CCACGTTTCTAGAGGCGTCACT CTGTCCAACAGATGGACATGCT BC030805.1
Versican VCN TGGAATGATGTTCCCTGCAA AAGGTCTTGGCATTTTCTACAACAG NM_004385.4

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Q-PCR analysis of proteoglycan biosynthesis enzyme gene expression in hNSC H9 cells and nhNPCs. Relative expression in hNSC H9 cells and nhNPCs of: (A) HS chain synthesising and modifying enzymes; (B) HS chain N-deacelylating/N-sulfating enzymes; (C) HS chain sulfating enzymes; and (D) CS chain sulfating enzymes. Relative expression normalised to 18 S, error bars=SD, statistical significance: p<0.05, ⁎⁎p<0.01, ⁎⁎⁎p<0.001.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Q-PCR analysis of proteoglycan core protein gene expression in hNSC H9 cells and nhNPCs. Relative expression in hNSC H9 cells and nhNPCs of: cell surface HSPGs (A) syndecans; (B) glypicans; and extracellular CSPGs and HSPGs (C) aggrecan, versican, perlecan and decorin. Relative expression normalised to 18 S, error bars=SD, statistical significance: p<0.05, ⁎⁎p<0.01, ⁎⁎⁎p<0.001.

2. Experimental design, materials and methods

2.1. Cell culture

Gibco® human neural stem cells derived from NIH-approved H9 (WA09) embryonic stem cells (hNSC H9 cells) were cultured as a monolayer on Geltrex® coated culture dishes in StemPro® NSC serum-free medium (NSC SFM) containing KnockOUT DMEM/F-12 supplemented with 2% StemPro® Neural Supplement, 20 ng/ml FGFb and EGF and 2 mM GlutaMAX (cells and culture reagents obtained from Thermo Fisher). hNSC H9 cells were cultured in p35 (10 cm2) dishes with culture medium changed every two days and cells passaged at 90% confluence using TrypLE. hNSC H9 cells were passaged twice and harvested for RNA at passage 3 (P3). Normal Human Neural Progenitor Cells (nhNPCs) isolated from the human brain cortex were cultured as neurospheres in Neural Progenitor Maintenance Bulletkit medium (NPMM) containing 200 mL of Neural Progenitor Basal Medium supplemented with 0.4 mL rhFGF-B, 0.4 mL rhEGF, 4 mL Neural Survival Factor-1 and 0.4 mL Gentamicin/Amphotericin (cells and culture reagents obtained from Lonza). nhNPC neurosphere cultures were established by defrosting the cell ampule according to the manufacturer’s instructions and dividing the cells into two T75 (75 cm2) flasks containing 20 mL of NPMM. hNSC H9 and nhNPCs cultures were maintained in 5% CO2 at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with phenotype of the cells monitored under an Olympus IX81 inverted phase-contrast microscope.

2.2. RNA extraction

RNA was harvested from cultured cells using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen) using the Direct-zol RNA miniprep kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with samples treated in-column with DNase I (Zymo Research). RNA was eluted in RNase-free H2O and concentration and quality of RNA determined with a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific).

2.3. cDNA synthesis

For conversion of RNA into cDNA, 150 ng of RNA was incubated with 200 ng of Random Primer (New England BioLabs) at 65 °C for 10 min in a reaction made up to 20 μl with Milli-Q-H2O. Samples were then incubated with 10 U of Transcriptor Reverse Transcriptase (Roche) and 1 mM dNTPs (New England Biolabs), 20 U of RNaseOUT (Invitrogen) in 1x RT reaction buffer in a total reaction volume of 30 μl. For the reverse transcription reaction samples were incubated at 25 °C for 10 min, then at 55 °C for 30 min and finally at 85 °C for 5 min. Concentration and quality of cDNA was measured on a NanoDrop spectrophotometer and cDNA was diluted to 40 ng/mL working concentrations.

2.4. Quantitative real-time PCR

Relative gene expression was detected using quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR). The 10 μl reaction volume contained 5 μl of SYBR®-Green PCR Master Mix (Promega), 200 ng of forward and reverse primer, 0.1 μl CXR reference dye (Promega) and 120 ng cDNA template. Amplification was monitored on an Applied Biosystems 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR system with an enzyme activation of 2 min at 50 °C and 3 min at 95 °C followed by 50 cycles of 3 s at 95 °C and 30 s at 60 °C. The cycle threshold (Ct) values were normalised against the endogenous control 18 S (forward primer TTCGAGGCCCTGTAATTGGA, reverse primer GCA GCAACTTAATATACGCTAT) Ct values (ΔCt value) included in each run, and relative gene expression was determined by the ΔΔCt value (2(−ΔCt)). For ease of graphic presentation of relative gene expression, ΔΔCt values were multiplied by 106. Primer sequences for detected NSC and neural lineage genes are presented in Table 1 and primer sequences for heparan and chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan associated genes are presented in Table 2.

2.4.1. Immunofluorescence (IF)

Expression of selected NSC and neural lineage marker proteins were detected via IF using an Olympus IX81 inverted phase-contrast fluorescent microscope and images acquired using Volocity software (Perkin-Elmer) on a Hamamatsu Orca camera. For imaging, cells were plated on 8-well CC2-coated chamber slides (Lab-Tek) at 20–30×104 cells/well and cells were cultured for 3–4 days before fixing and staining. Briefly, culture medium was removed, cells rinsed with 1× PBS with Ca2+ and Mg2+ and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. After this cells were blocked (5% Donkey serum, 1% BSA in PBS with or without 0.1% Triton-X to allow permeabilisation) and primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 °C. Isotype control antibodies were used as a negative control. After 24 h incubation, primary antibodies were removed, cells rinsed with 1× PBS with Ca2+ and Mg2+ and cells incubated with secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. Finally, cells were rinsed with 1× PBS with Ca2+ and Mg2+ and slides mounted with DAPI (ab104139, Abcam). Antibodies and dilutions used are presented in Table 3.

2.4.2. Statistical analysis

For Q-PCR analysis each gene was detected in quadruplicate per sample. Paired t-test was used to determine statistical significance and defined as * p<0.5, ** p<0.01 and *** p<0.001. Error bars represent SD.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported through Queensland University of Technology postgraduate research awards (QUTPRA and IPRS) and the Estate of the late Clem Jones AO.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2016.02.030.

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.pdf (43KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Oikari L.E. Cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans as novel markers of human neural stem cell fate determination. Stem Cell. Res. 2015;16(1):92–104. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2015.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cui H. Proteoglycans in the central nervous system: role in development, neural repair, and Alzheimer׳s disease. IUBMB Life. 2013;65(2):108–120. doi: 10.1002/iub.1118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dreyfuss J.L. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans: structure, protein interactions and cell signaling. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2009;81(3):409–429. doi: 10.1590/s0001-37652009000300007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ford-Perriss M. Localisation of specific heparan sulfate proteoglycans during the proliferative phase of brain development. Dev. Dyn. 2003;227(2):170–184. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.10298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gama C.I. Sulfation patterns of glycosaminoglycans encode molecular recognition and activity. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006;2(9):467–473. doi: 10.1038/nchembio810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lanner F. Heparan sulfation-dependent fibroblast growth factor signaling maintains embryonic stem cells primed for differentiation in a heterogeneous state. Stem Cells. 2010;28(2):191–200. doi: 10.1002/stem.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Maeda N. Functions of chondroitin sulfate and heparan sulfate in the developing brain. Neurochem. Res. 2011;36(7):1228–1240. doi: 10.1007/s11064-010-0324-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wu Y. Regulation of glioblastoma multiforme stem-like cells by inhibitor of DNA binding proteins and oligodendroglial lineage-associated transcription factors. Cancer Sci. 2012;103(6):1028–1037. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02260.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Samsonraj R.M. Telomere length analysis of human mesenchymal stem cells by quantitative PCR. Gene. 2013;519(2):348–355. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ovchinnikov D.A. Transgenic human ES and iPS reporter cell lines for identification and selection of pluripotent stem cells in vitro. Stem Cell. Res. 2014;13(2):251–261. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2014.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.pdf (43KB, pdf)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES