Skip to main content
Bulletin of the World Health Organization logoLink to Bulletin of the World Health Organization
. 2016 Jan 21;94(3):215–221. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.155812

Household air pollution and the sustainable development goals

Pollution de l'air domestique et objectifs de développement durable

Contaminación del aire en los hogares y objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

تلوث الهواء المنزلي وأهداف التنمية المستدامة

家庭空气污染和可持续发展目标

Загрязнение воздуха в домашних хозяйствах и цели в области устойчивого развития

Adeladza Kofi Amegah a,, Jouni JK Jaakkola b
PMCID: PMC4773927  PMID: 26966333

Abstract

Globally, 41% of households, over 2.8 billion people, rely on solid fuels (coal and biomass) for cooking and heating. In developing countries in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa where these fuels are predominantly used, women who are customarily responsible for cooking, and their young children, are most exposed to the resulting air pollution. Solid fuels are still in widespread use and it appears that intervention efforts are not keeping pace with population growth in developing countries. Here we pinpoint the challenges and identify opportunities for addressing household air pollution while mitigating global climate change and promoting the sustainable development goals.

We recommend the following actions: implementation of the WHO indoor air quality guidelines on household fuel combustion; effective promotion and dissemination of improved cookstoves through formation of country alliances for clean cookstoves; expansion of liquefied petroleum gas production facilities and distribution networks; harnessing renewable energy potential; promotion of biogas production at both household and community level; ensuring improved ventilation of homes through education and enforcement of building standards; and exploiting opportunities in the health and other sectors for changing health-damaging cooking behaviour.

Introduction

Globally, 41% of households, over 2.8 billion people, rely on solid fuels (coal and biomass) for cooking and heating.1 In developing countries, solid fuels are typically burnt in open fires and inefficient traditional cookstoves, often in poorly ventilated cooking spaces. Women who are customarily responsible for cooking, and their young children, are most exposed to the resulting high levels of air pollutants released including carbon monoxide (CO) and particulate matter (PM).

In 2010, household air pollution was estimated to be responsible for 3.5 million premature deaths worldwide.2 Household air pollution also contributes to outdoor air pollution, causing an additional 370 000 deaths and 9.9 million disability-adjusted life years globally in 2010.3 There is strong evidence linking household air pollution exposure with cardiovascular diseases,4,5 acute lower respiratory infections, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic bronchitis, lung cancer, cataract,6,7 low birth weight and stillbirth.8,9 Other health outcomes associated with household air pollution, for which evidence is less robust, include pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer,10,11 otitis media,12 asthma,13,14 tuberculosis,15 neonatal mortality16 and nutritional deficit.17 Indirect health effects from collecting firewood include assault of women and girls, insect (including disease vector) and snake bites, school absenteeism and musculoskeletal injuries from having to carry large bundles of firewood on the head and back for long distances.18

Solid fuels are still in widespread use in developing countries and it appears that intervention efforts are not keeping pace with population growth.19 The population mainly using solid fuel for cooking has remained unchanged over the last three decades at around 2.7 to 2.8 billion.1 Between 1980 and 2010, the population exposed to household air pollution increased from 333 million to 646 million in sub-Saharan Africa and from 162 million to 190 million in the eastern Mediterranean. In south-east Asia, the population exposed to household air pollution remained stable during the period at around 1 billion people.1

Recently, the World Health Organization (WHO) asserted that action to address the household air pollution problem has historically been slow, under-funded and ineffective.20 A systematic review of factors influencing uptake of cookstove interventions was recently published.21 Another review focusing on all interventions to reduce household air pollution and improve health in developing countries is in progress.22 Here we pinpoint the challenges, suggest improvements to existing interventions and identify new opportunities for addressing household air pollution in relation to the sustainable development goals (SDGs).23

Indoor air quality guidelines

The recent WHO indoor air quality guidelines20 are tailored to the particular needs of developing countries where the burden of household air pollution is greatest. The guidelines recognize the challenges likely to be faced in implementation and provide detailed information on cookstove performance and potential health risks. Effective implementation of the guidelines will require strong environmental health programmes to improve understanding of the complexities of the household air pollution problem and inform national response.

Improved cookstoves

Interventions to reduce household air pollution have primarily focused on the promotion and dissemination of improved cookstoves. However, despite the distribution of millions of improved cookstoves in developing countries over the last three decades, problems with household air pollution persist. This limited success is due to several factors, including lack of awareness of the problem and a lack of affordable stoves and fuels that reduce exposures appreciably.24,25 Lack of reliable exposure–response data has also been suggested as a reason for the failure of improved cookstoves to achieve the desired exposure reductions and health benefits.26

In China, the National Improved Stove Programme distributed about 130 million improved solid fuel stoves between 1980 and the early 1990s. However, household air pollution levels remained several times higher than national and WHO standards.27 In India, the National Programme for Improved Chulhas (traditional stoves) distributed more than 30 million improved stoves between 1985 and 2002. This programme was also widely regarded as a failure due to poor uptake and high air pollution emission levels.2830 Recent evaluations of interventions to promote improved cookstoves in south Asia have also revealed that their purported benefits may not have been realized.31,32 When stove interventions are well designed, implemented and monitored, they can have positive effects, but are unlikely to reduce household air pollution to levels recommended by WHO.33 The challenge therefore is to design fuel efficient stoves that reduce emissions to levels that are low enough to translate into health benefits.

Advanced combustion biomass stoves show substantial emissions’ reductions over traditional stoves, but cannot yet match emission levels from liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).34 In many countries, including China, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Kenya and Sri Lanka, locally manufactured stoves, which are usually cheap, dominate the market. These stoves are fuel efficient, but still have high air pollution emissions. Many past stove programmes and even some current programmes distribute cookstoves built by local artisans.35 Data from both laboratory and field settings suggest many of the stoves currently on the market are effectively fuel saving but have limited benefit in terms of emissions.36

Since 2010, the Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves (GACC) has led global efforts through engagement of interest groups including government ministries and agencies, manufacturers, distributors and users. Their goal is to switch 100 million households to clean cookstoves by 2020. Standardizing the testing of cookstoves is important to ensure that only fuel efficient cookstoves which also lower emissions are adopted. This requires product standards’ agencies in countries to be adequately resourced and empowered. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) provides guidelines for evaluating cookstove performance in terms of fuel efficiency, total emissions (CO and PM2.5), indoor emissions (CO and PM2.5) and safety (International Workshop Agreement (IWA) 11:2012). These guidelines are currently being developed into formal ISO standards that will lead to certification of cookstoves and other clean cooking devices (ISO Technical Committee 285).

Sustained use of improved cookstoves is impeded by cultural issues and other factors such as cooking in traditional utensils, multiple and bulk cooking, prolonged cooking time, poor stove design and the need for frequent maintenance.37 This situation often leads to stove stacking (the use of multiple stoves at one time). Design considerations, time saving and suitability for cooking traditional dishes have been mentioned as enablers of household uptake of improved cookstoves.21

Improved stoves will not necessarily be accepted by households38 unless stoves are designed to be compatible with the shapes of traditional cooking pots and modes of preparation of traditional foods. Evidence from multiple settings suggests that some clean and efficient cookstoves are not designed to execute the desired cooking tasks; this leads to continued use of traditional cookstoves alongside the improved stoves.3944 Successful implementation of cookstove programmes requires the involvement of women in designing the stoves, the training of users and follow-up in communities to address concerns.24,34

Liquefied petroleum gas

LPG is clean, burns efficiently, is easy to use, reduces cooking time and can significantly reduce emissions. To date, only one study conducted in Sudan has evaluated the impact of LPG use on household air pollution levels. This study reported substantial reductions in kitchen PM (51–80%) and CO (74–80%) levels.45 GACC-funded trials are presently underway in Ghana and Nepal to evaluate the impact of LPG and other clean cooking interventions on child survival outcomes. These trials will provide further evidence on the feasibility of LPG usage for reducing household air pollution and associated health risks.

Poverty and supply chain issues are major barriers to adoption of LPG for cooking in developing countries. LPG is expensive and may not be readily available due to limited distribution networks and competing use in motor vehicles. The limited distribution networks mean household members have to travel long distances to purchase the product, presenting additional cost to the household. The start-up cost (purchase of cooker, cylinder, regulator and hose) for using LPG at home is too high for most low-income households.46 Expanding LPG production facilities and distribution networks in developing countries requires a major financial commitment and often private sector involvement. The Global LPG Partnership aims to help developing countries overcome barriers to the widespread use of LPG through provision of capital and knowledge to expand LPG supply, infrastructure and distribution systems; assistance with policy and regulatory reforms to attract foreign investors; and financing LPG usage start-up costs. The World LPG Association has a key goal to inform and educate all stakeholders about the benefits of LPG and is committed to rolling out clean energy in developing countries.

Because LPG is heavily subsidized in many countries to promote household use, commercial vehicle owners have exploited the situation by refitting their vehicles to use LPG. This problem can be solved by creating two market prices for LPG (a subsidized price for domestic users and an unsubsidized price for vehicle users) or by legislating against retrofitting vehicles to use LPG. Although LPG subsidies have helped to make the product more accessible, the subsidized price is still beyond the reach of many low-income households.47 Social protection programmes in these countries should consider the provision of LPG.

Renewable energy resources

Solar, wind, hydro and geothermal power can serve as safe, affordable sources of household energy while mitigating global climate change.48,49 Most countries have renewable energy potential many times their current energy consumption that can be exploited with current technology.50 For example, many areas of sub-Saharan Africa experience daily solar radiation of between 14.4 and 21.6 MJ/m2.51 Geothermal resources are abundant in east Africa52 with great potential for wind power also present around the coastal regions and eastern highlands.53 The Green Climate Fund54 is a promising source of funds to develop the infrastructure required to exploit these renewable energy resources.

Biogas, produced from the breakdown of biodegradable materials under anaerobic conditions, also has the potential to reduce dependence on solid fuels in developing countries. Developing countries are beset with numerous waste management problems. Municipal and human wastes, which pose environmental and human health threats if not well managed, can instead serve as feedstock for biogas production. Biogas production can also reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve livelihoods and health.49 China has about 750 large- and medium-scale industrial biogas plants installed, over 7.5 million biogas digesters in use in households and a network of rural biogas service centres.55 India also has a large household-scale programme with active programmes also found in Kenya, Nepal, Sri Lanka and several countries in Latin America.55 Bio-latrines, a low maintenance system, can replace pit latrines which are in widespread use in developing countries (Box 1). Methane gas produced by anaerobic decomposition of the sewage is collected and stored for domestic use. The treated waste is high in plant nutrients and can be used or sold as fertilizer to generate income. However, bio-latrines are not always culturally acceptable.

Box 1. The triple dividend of bio-latrine technology in Kitale, western Kenya: improved sanitation, clean cooking and lighting and fertilizer for farming.

Kitale is a small agricultural town located in western Kenya with a rapidly growing population (106 187 in 2009). Almost two thirds of the town’s residents live in slums and informal settlements which are water-logged and have no piped water, sewers or sanitation services. Water is thus sourced from the river in the area which is contaminated with sewage, oil and solid waste. Sanitation in these informal settlements is very poor and is driven by the lack of affordable sanitation options, low awareness of potential health hazards and land tenure insecurity. The situation has resulted in several adverse health outcomes including high levels of waterborne diseases and ill-health.

Bio-latrines have been installed in four primary schools in the informal settlements and provide safe and hygienic sanitation facilities for 2780 children. The bio-latrines also provide fuel for cooking in the school kitchens and lighting in the classrooms to enable the pupils, especially those residing in crowded single occupancy rooms, to study in the evenings. The bio-latrines further generate organic fertilizer for use in the school farms to support the school meals programme. Local manufacturers have quickly realized the potential of the bio-latrine technology and have become involved in the construction of bio-latrines in the community.

Source: Khatavkar and Matthews.56

Housing improvements

Housing improvements and modifications also offer potential for significantly reducing household air pollution exposure. Creating and enlarging kitchen windows, fitting flues and smoke hoods, enlarging roof spaces, raising cooking surfaces from ground level to waist height and separating cooking areas from other living spaces are important modifications that should be promoted. Education and information dissemination have traditionally been the approach to ensuring housing improvements for improved health. In developing countries, this approach has failed and the key to the success of this strategy is enforcement of building standards. Unfortunately, in low-income countries, enforcing building standards is also a major challenge, as construction is often informal without plans and permits. Building inspectorate departments need to be better resourced, to enable them carry out their functions efficiently.

Behavioural change

A recent review of behavioural change interventions to reduce childhood household air pollution exposure reported that behavioural change strategies have the potential to reduce household air pollution exposure by 20–98% in laboratory settings and 31–94% in field settings.57 Household air pollution exposure can be reduced by cooking outdoors, reducing time spent in the cooking area, keeping the kitchen door open while cooking, avoiding leaning over the fire while attending to the cooking, avoiding carrying children while cooking and keeping children away from the cooking area. Opportunities to educate communities on reducing household air pollution exposure include durbars, festival celebrations, religious meetings and child welfare outreach clinics. Community health workers are the fulcrum of the health system in many developing countries58 and represent an excellent resource for educating communities.

The GACC and future country alliances should engage national health authorities to incorporate household air pollution and clean cooking in the training modules of frontline health workers. Community-based health surveillance volunteers assist with health service delivery in some Sub-Saharan African countries, notably Ethiopia, Ghana, Mali and Niger.59 In other countries, environmental health and sanitation officers of local government departments are responsible for ensuring proper environmental and sanitary conditions in communities. These people are other potential resources for educating communities.

Recommendations

Actions to reduce household air pollution in developing countries should also help to achieve important SDG targets (Table 1). Implementation of the WHO indoor air quality guidelines on household fuel combustion is strongly recommended and requires WHO to provide strong technical support to countries through their regional and country offices. This will help achieve a very important health-related SDG target (3.9). It is within the mandates of environmental protection agencies in these countries to lead the implementation process but the involvement of all stakeholders, including communities, and academic and research institutions, is required. Governments should endeavour to adequately resource these agencies to effectively take up the task, and in countries where no such agencies exist, they should be supported by development partners to establish an agency.

Table 1. Recommended actions for reducing household air pollution and implications for the Sustainable Development Goals.

Sustainable Development Goal and Targets23 Recommended action
3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages

3.9: By 2030, substantially reduce the number of deaths and illnesses from hazardous chemicals and air, water and soil pollution and contamination Implementation of WHO indoor air quality guidelines on household fuel combustion
Housing improvements and modifications through education and enforcement of building standards
Behavioural change through education at community meetings and outreach points
6: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
6.2: By 2030, achieve access to adequate and equitable sanitation and hygiene for all and end open defecation, paying special attention to the needs of women and girls and those in vulnerable situations Promotion of biogas production at both household and community level
6.3: By 2030, improve water quality by reducing pollution, eliminating dumping and minimizing release of hazardous chemicals and materials, halving the proportion of untreated wastewater and increasing recycling and safe reuse globally
7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and
modern energy for all
7.1: By 2030, ensure universal access to affordable, reliable and modern energy services
7.b: By 2030, expand infrastructure and upgrade technology for supplying modern and sustainable energy services for all in developing countries, in particular least developed countries and small island developing states
Expansion of liquefied petroleum gas production facilities and distribution networks
7.2: By 2030, increase substantially the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix
7.a: By 2030, enhance international cooperation to facilitate access to clean energy research and technology, including renewable energy, energy efficiency and advanced and cleaner fossil-fuel technology, and promote investment in energy infrastructure and clean energy technology
Investment in renewable energy technology
11: Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
11.1: By 2030, ensure access for all to adequate, safe and affordable housing and basic services and upgrade slums Housing improvements and modifications through education and enforcement of building standards
11.6: By 2030, reduce the adverse per capita environmental impact of cities, including by paying special attention to air quality and municipal and other waste management Promotion of biogas production at both household and community level
12: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
12.5: By 2030, substantially reduce waste generation through prevention, reduction, recycling and reuse Promotion of biogas production at both household and community level
12.a: Support developing countries to strengthen their scientific and technological capacity to move towards more sustainable patterns of consumption and production Investment in renewable energy technology
13: Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts
13.a: Implement the commitment undertaken by developed-country parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to a goal of mobilizing jointly US$100 billion annually by 2020 from all sources to address the needs of developing countries in the context of meaningful mitigation actions and transparency on implementation and fully operationalize the Green Climate Fund through its capitalization as soon as possible Investment in renewable energy technology
15: Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss

15.2: By 2020, promote the implementation of sustainable management of all types of forests, halt deforestation, restore degraded forests and increase afforestation and reforestation globally Effective promotion and dissemination of improved cookstoves

US$: United States Dollars, WHO: World Health Organization.

Ensuring improved ventilation of homes through education of communities on the health benefits and enforcement of building standards is also required; local government authorities are responsible for implementing this recommendation. Countries should also consider exploiting opportunities in health and other sectors, and communities, to change health-damaging cooking behaviour of households.

We recommend building biogas plants in metropolitan areas especially, where the feedstock seems readily available due to the mounting waste management problems in these areas, and promoting bio-latrine technology in rural areas where they are culturally acceptable. Implementing this recommendation requires collaboration between energy ministries and local government authorities in the countries concerned and will drive water and sanitation targets (SDG 6.2, 6.3 and 12.5). Governments should also seek technical and financial assistance, both locally and externally, to expand LPG production facilities and distribution networks and to harness their renewable energy potential. These actions will help achieve important sustainable energy and consumption, and climate change targets (SDG 7.1, 7.2, 7.a, 7.b, 12.a and 13.a).

Finally, effective promotion and dissemination of improved cookstoves is also recommended. This requires the formation of country alliances for clean cookstoves to seek the engagement of all stakeholders including manufacturers and users and provide a platform for sharing ideas, addressing concerns and collectively setting sector-wide goals and targets. An important forest conservation target (SDG 15.2) will be promoted through implementation of this recommendation.

Conclusion

Solid fuels are still in widespread use in developing countries and it appears that intervention efforts are not achieving their desired goals. Providing clean household energy solutions in the effort to tackle household air pollution in developing countries can also mitigate global climate change and help to achieve several of the sustainable development goals.

Competing interests:

None declared.

References

  • 1.Bonjour S, Adair-Rohani H, Wolf J, Bruce NG, Mehta S, Prüss-Ustün A, et al. Solid fuel use for household cooking: country and regional estimates for 1980–2010. Environ Health Perspect. 2013. July;121(7):784–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012. December 15;380(9859):2224–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chafe ZA, Brauer M, Klimont Z, Van Dingenen R, Mehta S, Rao S, et al. Household cooking with solid fuels contributes to ambient PM2.5 air pollution and the burden of disease. Environ Health Perspect. 2014. December;122(12):1314–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McCracken JP, Wellenius GA, Bloomfield GS, Brook RD, Tolunay HE, Dockery DW, et al. Household air pollution from solid fuel use: evidence for links to CVD. Glob Heart. 2012. September;7(3):223–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Noubiap JJ, Essouma M, Bigna JJ. Targeting household air pollution for curbing the cardiovascular disease burden: a health priority in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015. October;17(10):825–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Smith KR, Mehta S, Feuz M. Indoor air pollution from household use of solid fuels. In: Ezzati M, Rodgers A, Lopez AD, Murray CJL, editors. Comparative quantification of health risk: global and regional burden of disease due to selected major risk factors. Geneva: WHO; 2004. pp. 1435–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Smith KR, Bruce N, Balakrishnan K, Adair-Rohani H, Balmes J, Chafe Z, et al. ; HAP CRA Risk Expert Group. Millions dead: how do we know and what does it mean? Methods used in the comparative risk assessment of household air pollution. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:185–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pope DP, Mishra V, Thompson L, Siddiqui AR, Rehfuess EA, Weber M, et al. Risk of low birth weight and stillbirth associated with indoor air pollution from solid fuel use in developing countries. Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32:70–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Amegah AK, Quansah R, Jaakkola JJK. Household air pollution from solid fuel use and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e113920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Feng BJ, Khyatti M, Ben-Ayoub W, Dahmoul S, Ayad M, Maachi F, et al. Cannabis, tobacco and domestic fumes intake are associated with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in North Africa. Br J Cancer. 2009. October 6;101(7):1207–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sapkota A, Zaridze D, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, Mates D, Fabiánová E, Rudnai P, et al. Indoor air pollution from solid fuels and risk of upper aerodigestive tract cancers in central and eastern Europe. Environ Res. 2013. January;120:90–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.da Costa JL, Navarro A, Neves JB, Martin M. Household wood and charcoal smoke increases risk of otitis media in childhood in Maputo. Int J Epidemiol. 2004. June;33(3):573–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Desai M, Mehta S, Smith K. Indoor smoke from solid fuels: assessing the environmental burden of disease at national and local levels. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. Available from: http://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/publications/9241591358/en/ [cited 2015 Dec 16]. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Po JY, FitzGerald JM, Carlsten C. Respiratory disease associated with solid biomass fuel exposure in rural women and children: systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2011. March;66(3):232–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sumpter C, Chandramohan D. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations between indoor air pollution and tuberculosis. Trop Med Int Health. 2013. January;18(1):101–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Epstein MB, Bates MN, Arora NK, Balakrishnan K, Jack DW, Smith KR. Household fuels, low birth weight, and neonatal death in India: the separate impacts of biomass, kerosene, and coal. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2013. August;216(5):523–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bruce NG, Dherani MK, Das JK, Balakrishnan K, Adair-Rohani H, Bhutta ZA, et al. Control of household air pollution for child survival: estimates for intervention impacts. BMC Public Health. 2013;13 Suppl 3:S8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Oluwole O, Otaniyi OO, Ana GA, Olopade CO. Indoor air pollution from biomass fuels: a major health hazard in developing countries. J Public Health. 2012;20:565–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Energy for cooking in developing countries. World energy outlook 2006. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2006. pp. 419–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.WHO indoor air quality guidelines: household fuel combustion. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. Available from: http://www.who.int/indoorair/guidelines/hhfc/en/ [cited 2015 Dec 16]. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Debbi S, Elisa P, Nigel B, Dan P, Eva R. Factors influencing household uptake of improved solid fuel stoves in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014. August;11(8):8228–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Quansah R, Ochieng CA, Semple S, Juvekar S, Emina J, Armah FA, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to reduce indoor air pollution and/or improve health in homes using solid fuel in lower and middle income countries: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2015;4:22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Resolution A/RES/70/1. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. In: Seventieth General Assembly, New York, 15 September–2 October. Resolutions. New York: United Nations; 2015. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publicationhttp://[cited 2015 Dec 16].
  • 24.World health statistics 2012. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. Available from: http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/2012/en/index.htmlhttp://[cited 2015 Dec 16].
  • 25.Martin WJ 2nd, Glass RI, Balbus JM, Collins FS. Public health. A major environmental cause of death. Science. 2011. October 14;334(6053):180–1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Clark ML, Peel JL, Balakrishnan K, Breysse PN, Chillrud SN, Naeher LP, et al. Health and household air pollution from solid fuel use: the need for improved exposure assessment. Environ Health Perspect. 2013. October;121(10):1120–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sinton JE, Smith KR, Peabody JW, Yaping L, Xiliang Z, Edwards R, et al. An assessment of programs to promote improved household stoves in China. Energy Sustain Dev. 2004;8(3):33–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kishore VVN, Ramana PV. Improved cookstoves in rural India: how improved are they? A critique of the perceived benefits from the national programme on improved chulhas. Energy. 2002;27:47–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Greenglass N, Smith K. Current improved cookstove (ICS) activities in South Asia:a web-based survey. Falmouth: Woods Hole Research Center; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sinha B. The Indian stove programme: An insider’s view: the role of society, politics, economics and education. Boiling Point. 2002;48:23–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mobarak AM, Dwivedi P, Bailis R, Hildemann L, Miller G. Low demand for nontraditional cookstove technologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012. July 3;109(27):10815–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hanna R, Duflo E, Greenstone M. Up in smoke: the influence of household behavior on the long-run impact of improved cooking stoves. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2012.
  • 33.Thomas E, Wickramasinghe K, Mendis S, Roberts N, Foster C. Improved stove interventions to reduce household air pollution in low and middle income countries: a descriptive systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Venkataraman C, Sagar AD, Habib G, Lam N, Smith KR. The Indian national initiative for advanced biomass cookstoves: the benefits of clean combustion. Energy Sustain Dev. 2010;14:63–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Household cookstoves, environment, health, and climate change. Washington: World Bank; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Anenberg SC, Balakrishnan K, Jetter J, Masera O, Mehta S, Moss J, et al. Cleaner cooking solutions to achieve health, climate, and economic cobenefits. Environ Sci Technol. 2013. May 7;47(9):3944–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rehfuess EA, Puzzolo E, Stanistreet D, Pope D, Bruce NG. Enablers and barriers to large-scale uptake of improved solid fuel stoves: a systematic review. Environ Health Perspect. 2014. February;122(2):120–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Martin WJ 2nd, Glass RI, Araj H, Balbus J, Collins FS, Curtis S, et al. Household air pollution in low- and middle-income countries: health risks and research priorities. PLoS Med. 2013;10(6):e1001455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Masera OR, Navia J. Fuel switching or multiple cooking fuels? Understanding inter-fuel substitution patterns in rural Mexican households. Biomass Bioenergy. 1997;12(5):347–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Joon V, Chandra A, Bhattacharya M. Household energy consumption pattern and socio-cultural dimensions associated with it: A case study of rural Haryana, India. Biomass Bioenergy. 2009;33(11):1509–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Heltberg R. Fuel switching: Evidence from eight developing countries. Energy Econ. 2004;26(5):869–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Heltberg R. Factors determining household fuel choice in Guatemala. Environ Dev Econ. 2005;10(3):337–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hiemstra-van der Horst G, Hovorka AJ. Reassessing the “energy ladder”: household energy use in Maun, Botswana. Energy Policy. 2008;36(9):3333–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mukhopadhyay R, Sambandam S, Pillarisetti A, Jack D, Mukhopadhyay K, Balakrishnan K, et al. Cooking practices, air quality, and the acceptability of advanced cookstoves in Haryana, India: an exploratory study to inform large-scale interventions. Glob Health Action. 2012;5:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bates L. Participatory methods for design, installation, monitoring and assessment of smoke alleviation technologies. Smoke, health and household energy. Volume 1 Rugby: ITDG; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.D’Sa A, Murthy KVN. Report on the use of LPG as a domestic cooking fuel option in India. Bangalore: International Energy Initiative; 2004. Available from: http://www.bioenergylists.org/stovesdoc/Iei/IEIBLR-LPG-IndianhomesReport.pdfhttp://[cited 2015 Dec 16]. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Thompson LM. Cooking with gas: how children in the developing world benefit from switching to LPG. Paris: World LPG Association; 2015. Available from: http://www.wlpga.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/cooking-with-gas-how-children-in-the-developing-world-benefit-from-switching-to-lpg1.pdfhttp://[cited 2015 Dec 16]. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Seyboth K, Matschoss P, Kadner S, et al. , editors. IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, et al. , editors. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Deichmann U, Meisner C, Murray S, Wheeler D. The economics of renewable energy expansion in rural Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Policy. 2011;39:215–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Module 1: renewable energy and energy efficiency. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization; 2011. Available from: http://africa-toolkit.reeep.org/modules/Module1.pdf [cited 2015 Dec 16].
  • 52.Holm A, Blodgett L, Jennejohn D, Gawell K. Geothermal energy: international market update. Washington: Geothermal Energy Association; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Financing renewable energy in developing countries: drivers and barriers for private finance in sub-Saharan Africa. Geneva: United Nations Environment Program Finance Initiative; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Decision 3/CP.17. Launching the Green Climate Fund. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; 2011. Available from: http://unfccc.int /resource/docs /2011/cop17/eng /09a01.pdf#page=55http://[cited 2015 Dec 16].
  • 55.Biogas BL. Practical action technical brief. Rugby: Practical Action; 2007. Available from: http://answers.practicalaction.org/our-resources/item/biogas [cited 2015 Dec 16]. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Khatavkar A, Matthews S. Bio-latrines. Practical action technical brief. Rugby: Practical Action; 2013. Available from: http://answers.practicalaction.org/our-resources/item/bio-latrineshttp://[cited 2015 Dec 16]. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Barnes BR. Behavioural change, indoor air pollution and child respiratory health in developing countries: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014. May;11(5):4607–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Singh P, Sachs JD. 1 million community health workers in sub-Saharan Africa by 2015. Lancet. 2013. July 27;382(9889):363–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Leon N, Sanders D, Van Damme W, Besada D, Daviaud E, Oliphant NP, et al. The role of ‘hidden’ community volunteers in community-based health service delivery platforms: examples from sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:27214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the World Health Organization are provided here courtesy of World Health Organization

RESOURCES