Skip to main content
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine logoLink to Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
. 2016 Jan 15;11(3):988–992. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3001

Single-center study on transplantation of livers donated after cardiac death: A report of 6 cases

XU-YONG SUN 1,2,3,, JIAN-HUI DONG 1, KE QIN 1, LIU-GEN LAN 1, HAI-BIN LI 1, YING HUANG 1, SONG CAO 1, ZHUANG-JIANG LI 1, LONG-JUN DAI 1,4,
PMCID: PMC4774335  PMID: 26998025

Abstract

Effective use of all available donated organs is critical, in order to meet the increasing demand for transplants. The present study explored liver transplantation with livers that were donated following cardiac death (DCD). According to the guidelines established by The Red Cross Society of China, 42 DCD organs were procured. Selected donors were treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) prior to the organ retrieval. The present single-center study included 6 liver transplantations of DCD organs (5 liver transplants and 1 liver-kidney combined transplant). All 6 recipients had a successful recovery without significant complications. The serum alanine transaminase, total bilirubin and international normalized ratio returned to the normal levels within a short period of time following transplantation, and the liver function remained normal during the follow-up period, which lasted up to 24 months. The present report demonstrated the feasibility of orthotopic liver transplantation using DCD livers. The pre-conditioning DCD donors and optimization of the recipient's condition using ECMO, played a crucial role in ensuring the success of transplantation.

Keywords: donation after cardiac death, liver transplantation, hepatic cirrhosis

Introduction

Chronic liver disease is considered a major cause of mortality worldwide, and particularly in Asia (1). The majority of chronic liver diseases are initiated by hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (2,3). More than half a million people with HBV infection die annually from complications of chronic hepatitis B, such as hepatic cirrhosis and liver cancer (4). Liver transplantation has been shown to be the most effective therapy for patients with advanced liver disease (5). Transplantation offers patients, whose lives have been severely restricted or almost succumbed to the disease, a marked improvement in their health and well-being; however, the demand for organ transplants outreaches the number of donated organs (6). Organ donation after cardiac death (DCD) could maximize the use of these scarce resources. Previously known as non-heart-beating organ donation, DCD has been an end-of-life option for >30 years in the USA and Europe (7). DCD is performed in cases where life support is withdrawn from a patient after a physician has determined that there is no long-term prognosis for recovery, or in patients who do not meet the criteria for neurological death. The option of DCD should be offered prior to life support withdrawal, but only after the decision to withdraw has been reached (8).

Initially, DCD presented various limitations, such as poor organ function following transplantation. However, advances in medication and surgical techniques have markedly improved the outcomes for recipients of DCD organs. These advances, along with the severe shortage of donated organs promote DCD as an alternative for patients and families (8).

The use of DCD organs has rapidly developed in China since the establishment of DCD standard by the Red Cross Society and Ministry of Health of China in 2010 (9). The aim of the present study was to document successful liver transplantation using DCD organs and promote the development of these transplantation techniques in China.

The present single-centre study reports 6 liver transplantations performed with DCD organs, including 5 liver transplants and 1 liver-kidney combined transplant.

Case report

Between January 2011 and December 2013, 6 liver transplantations (including 1 liver-kidney and 5 liver transplants) were performed with DCD organs at the 303 Hospital of People's Liberation Army (Nanning, China), with the approval of the Medical Ethics Committee at this institution. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Transplant decisions were made according to the availability of donors, blood type and cross-matching. The 6 transplant recipients were males aged 35–47 years, who suffered from cirrhosis-induced hepatic decompensation (3 cases), primary liver cancer (2 cases) or hepatic decompensation combined with renal failure (1 case). Table I lists information obtained from the evaluation of the recipients.

Table I.

Recipient information.

Recipient Age, years Gender APACHE II score MELD Estimated mortality, %
1 42 Male   7   9   8
2 35 Male 14 38 12
3 37 Male   9 41 15
4 40 Male 11 34 11
5 47 Male 12 37   9
6 43 Male   6 13 25

APACHE II, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease.

Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring system and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) were used to evaluate the severity of liver disease in the recipients. APACHE II point scores are based upon values of 12 routine physiologic measurements, age and previous health status, in order to provide a general measure of the severity of disease (10). MELD predicts liver disease severity based on serum creatinine, serum total bilirubin and international normalized ratio (INR) (11).

In total, 42 DCD livers were collected between January 2011 and December 2013 at the 303 Hospital of People's Liberation Army from male patients aged 30–53 years, who succumbed to cerebral hemorrhage (13 cases) or traumatic brain injury (29 cases). The donation procedure followed the DCD guidelines of China (9). Of these, 32 donor livers were not procured due to alcoholic cirrhosis, liver cancer, hepatic distomiasis and long durations of hepatic warm ischemia (>30 min). Therefore, 10 DCD livers were successfully procured for transplantation, 4 of which were distributed to other centers through the Red Cross Society of China (Beijing, China). Transplantations of the remaining 6 livers were performed at the 303 Hospital of People's Liberation Army.

Preoperative evaluation was performed on all donors, and were found to be negative for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B surface antigen, HCV antibody and syphilis antibody (12). The blood oxygenation status and hemodynamics were maintained by the intensive care unit (ICU) group. Based on the stability of hemodynamics and blood oxygenation status, 5 donors were further supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for 6–10 h prior to organ retrieval. The 6 donors underwent controlled cardiac death, with planned withdrawal of ventilatory and organ-perfusion support in the face of catastrophic illness (Maastricht classification class III; 13). The University of Wisconsin score (UW; 14) was found to be 21–23 (Table II). The cardiac death occurred immediately following the withdrawal of life support, and the warm ischemia time was kept to within 10 min. Following the confirmation of cardiac death, the DCD organs were procured by a combined abdominal organ retrieval procedure (15). Table II lists the relevant information of all 6 donors.

Table II.

Donor information.

Donor Age, years Gender Cause of mortality UW score WI length, min CI, h
1 32 Male Traumatic brain injury 21 5.6 6.8
2 30 Male Cerebral hemorrhage 22 6.1 8.3
3 37 Male Traumatic brain injury 23 6.7 9.5
4 53 Male Cerebral hemorrhage 22 7.9 7.8
5 42 Male Traumatic brain injury 23 8.4 8.1
6 43 Male Traumatic brain injury 21 9.5 9.5

UW, University of Wisconsin score; WI, warm ischemia; CI, cold ischemia.

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) was then performed in the 6 liver transplant recipients. Liver transplantation by classical caval reconstruction was performed on 3 of the recipients (nos. 1, 3 and 6; Table I), while 2 recipients (nos. 2 and 4) received non-bypass OLT and 1 recipient (no. 5) underwent the piggy-back technique.

The immunity of the recipient was suppressed through the induction of rabbit anti-human T lymphocyte immunoglobulinG CD25 polyclonal antibody (100 mg/5 ml saline; S20090069; Fresenius Biotech GmBH, Grafelfing, Germany), followed by tacrolimus (0.15 mg/kg per day; Astellas Pharma China, Inc., Shanghai, China) and mycophenolate mofetil (3 mg/day; Roche Diagnostics, Shanghai, China). Postoperatively, all patients were maintained in the ICU for 5–10 days and received routine monitoring of vital signs and organ functions. The anastomotic sites of the transplanted livers were regularly monitored using color Doppler sonography. With regard to the patient that received the liver-kidney combined transplant, the renal artery resistance index and renal blood supply of the transplanted kidney were regularly examined. Recipients were administered 0.15 mg/kg micafungin sodium (Astellas Pharma China, Inc.) daily for the first 7–14 days following transplantation in order to prevent and treat inflammation.

The 6 recipients recovered considerably well without significant complications, such as primary graft failure, thrombosis, graft rejection or biliary stricture. The dynamic changes of serum alanine transaminase (ALT; Fig. 1), total bilirubin (TBil; Fig. 2) and INR (Fig. 3) were routinely recorded. The patient that received the liver-kidney combined transplant presented normal urine levels immediately following surgery (2,500 mlday) and the serum creatinine (Cr) levels had returned to the normal values within 7 days. All liver recipients were discharged from the hospital within 20–30 days after the transplantation. Their liver function remained normal during the entire follow-up period, which lasted up to 24 months.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Dynamic observation of serum ALT. ALT, alanine transaminase.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Changes in blood TBil. TBil, total bilirubin.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Measurements of INR. INR, international normalized ratio.

Discussion

At present, the data for the long-term outcomes of OLT using DCD livers are controversial. Certain studies using pooled registry data (16,17) have reported inferior transplant outcomes of DCD compared with donation following brain death (DBD), while single-center studies have shown comparable survival outcomes for the two types of organ donation (18,19). Since a DBD program has not yet been established in China, the use of DCD as a strategy to increase the limited availability of donor livers is critical.

In the present study, controlled class III cardiac death was observed in the 6 donors. The relatively short warm ischemia time was ensured by a high-risk UW score following the withdrawal of life support. The warm ischemia time of these 6 donors was found to be <10 min. Recent reports have indicated that the survival of DCD grafts, as well as their recipients, are significantly affected by complications, including primary non-function, hepatic artery thrombosis and ischemic cholangiopathy (20,21). Such complications, however, did not occur in any of the 6 recipients of the present study. Recipient 2 exhibited a high TBil, which may be associated with his preoperative status (MELD 38) or the quality of the transplanted liver. MELD is widely used to predict the severity of liver disease and is proportionally correlated with mortality risk (11). The high TBil of recipient 3 was due to the moderate steatosis observed in the DCD liver. A rapid decease in TBil was observed in recipients 1, 4, 5 and 6, who had low MELD scores and did not present liver steatosis. In recipients 2 and 3, the increase in INR may have been due to the high MELD scores and presence of liver steatosis.

The use of fatty livers (with steatosis) as grafts is relatively risky, since it has been found that the incidence of primary non-function in transplant recipients with liver steatosis is considerably higher compared with that in patients with normal livers (22). The early malfunction of grafted livers is proportionally associated with the extent of liver steatosis (23). A comparative study on the 3-month survival rate following liver implantation, length of stay in the ICU and hospital, as well as Child-Pugh evaluation (24) and liver function, demonstrated that the prognosis was not significantly affected by mild (10–30%) or moderate (30–60%) steatosis of the grafted liver (25). Kwon et al (26) analyzed 245 liver transplants with mild steatosis between 1999 and 2005, and divided the liver recipients into three groups, according to the degree of liver steatosis (the 0–9, 10–19 and 20–30% groups). No statistically significant differences were observed in detected parameters, including length of surgery, blood loss, peak value of TBil, serum aspartate aminotransferase and incidence of complications, among the three groups. The results were similar to those observed in 30 and 50% alcoholic cirrhosis livers (27). In the present study, 3 liver transplant recipients with moderate hepatic steatosis (recipients 4, 5 and 6) exhibited high ALT and TBil levels, which returned to the normal levels on day 17 following transplantation. In patients with normal liver grafts (recipients 1 and 2), ALT reached 200–400 Ul and returned to its normal levels on days 7 (recipient 1) and 9 (recipient 2) following transplantation. Notably, recipient 3 exhibited a fast recovery of liver function without any indication of hepatic steatosis.

China is of the counties with the highest demands of liver transplants worldwide, mainly due to the extremely high incidence of HBV and liver cancer (28). The appropriate application of DCD may be able to maximize the use of these scarce resources, in order to save more lives. In the present study, the transplantation of DCD livers with moderate steatosis indicated that controlled class III, high UW score and short warm ischemia time are essential factors in determining the success of transplantation. ECMO was able to maintain steady hemodynamics and high blood oxygenation, thereby improving donor liver function prior to organ retrieval, which played an important role in the successful short- and long-term outcomes of liver transplantation.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (no. 2013GXNSFAA019253) and Guangxi Science and Technology Development Project (no. 14124003-8).

References

  • 1.Wang FS, Fan JG, Zhang Z, Gao B, Wang HY. The global burden of liver disease: The major impact of China. Hepatology. 2014;60:2099–2108. doi: 10.1002/hep.27406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lai CL, Ratziu V, Yuan MF, Poynard T. Viral hepatitis B. Lancet. 2003;362:2089–2094. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15108-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Poynard T, Yuan MF, Ratziu V, Lai CL. Viral hepatitis C. Lancet. 2003;362:2095–2100. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15109-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cholongitas E, Tziomalos K, Pipili C. Management of patients with hepatitis B in special populations. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:1738–1748. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Watt KD. Keys to long-term care of the liver transplant recipient. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12:639–648. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hackl C, Schlitt HJ, Kirchner GI, Knoppke B, Loss M. Liver transplantation for malignancy: Current treatment strategies and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:5331–5344. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Morrissey PE, Monaco AP. Donation after circulatory death: current practices, ongoing challenges, and potential improvements. Transplantation. 2014;97:258–264. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000437178.48174.db. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Manara AR, Murphy PG, O'Callaghan G. Donation after circulatory death. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(Suppl 1):i108–i121. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu Y. Establishment of human organ donation system in China - resolving the issues of organ sources and standardizing the procedures of organ transplantation. Zhong Hua Qi Guan Yi Zhi Za Zhi. 2010;31:390–392. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II. A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:818–829. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wiesner R, Edwards E, Freeman R, Harper A, Kim R, Kamath P, Kremers W, Lake J, Howard T, Merion RM, et al. United Network for Organ Sharing Liver Disease Severity Score Committee: Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:91–96. doi: 10.1053/gast.2003.50016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu YF. Assessment of organs from cardiac death donors and in vitro preparation. Zhong Hua Qi Guan Yi Zhi Za Zhi. 2010;31:393–396. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kootstra G, Daemen JH, Oomen AP. Categories of non-heart-beating donors. Transplant Proc. 1995;27:2893–2894. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lewis J, Peltier J, Nelson H, Snyder W, Schneider K, Steinberger D, Anderson M, Krichevsky A, Anderson J, Ellefson J, D'Alessandro A. Development of the University of Wisconsin donation After Cardiac Death Evaluation Tool. Prog Transplant. 2003;13:265–273. doi: 10.7182/prtr.13.4.w48g8051530058q3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Issa S, Al-Bishri S. The role of early identification of superior mesenteric artery in a modified technique for retrieval of abdominal organs for transplantation. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2008;19:389–396. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Johnson RJ, Bradbury LL, Martin K, Neuberger J. UK Transplant Registry: Organ donation and transplantation in the UK-the last decade: A report from the UK national transplant registry. Transplantation. 2014;97(Suppl 1):S1–S27. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000438215.16737.68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Callaghan CJ, Charman SC, Muiesan P, Powell JJ, Gimson AE, van der Meulen JH. UK Liver Transplant Audit: Outcomes of transplantation of livers from donation after circulatory death donors in the UK. A cohort study. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e003287. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dubbeld J, van Hoek B, Ringers J. Use of a liver from donor after cardiac death: Is it appropriate for the sick or the stable? Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2011;16:239–242. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e3283447acd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Grewal HP, Willingham DL, Nguyen J, Hewitt WR, Taner BC, Cornell D, Rosser BG, Keaveny AP, Aranda-Michel J, Satyanarayana R, et al. Liver transplantation using controlled donation after cardiac death donors: An analysis of a large single-center experience. Liver Transpl. 2009;15:1028–1035. doi: 10.1002/lt.21811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jay C, Ladner D, Wang E, Lyuksemburg V, Kang R, Chang Y, Feinglass J, Holl JL, Abecassis M, Skaro AI. A comprehensive risk assessment of mortality following donation after cardiac death liver transplant - an analysis of the national registry. J Hepatol. 2011;55:808–813. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.01.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Foley DP, Fernandez LA, Leverson G, Anderson M, Mezrich J, Sollinger HW, D'Alessandro A. Biliary complications after liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: An analysis of risk factors and long-term outcomes from a single center. Ann Surg. 2011;253:817–825. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182104784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Neuberger J. Transplantation: Assessment of liver allograft steatosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10:328–329. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ureña MA, Ruiz-Delgado FC, González EM, Segurola CL, Romero CJ, García IG, González-Pinto I, Sanz Gómez R. Assessing risk of the use of livers with macro and microsteatosis in a liver transplant program. Transplant Proc. 1998;30:3288–3291. doi: 10.1016/S0041-1345(98)01033-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg. 1973;60:646–649. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800600817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nikeghbalian S, Nejatollahi SM, Salahi H, Bahador A, Sabet B, Jalaeian H, Geramizadeh B, Dehghani SM, Malek-Hosseini SA. Does donor's fatty liver change impact on early mortality and outcome of liver transplantation? Transplant Proc. 2007;39:1181–1183. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kwon CH, Joh JW, Lee KW, Kim SJ, Han YS, Park JW, Kim DJ, Park JB, Lee SK. Safety of donors with fatty liver in liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2006;38:2106–2107. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cho JY, Suh KS, Kwon CH, Yi NJ, Kim MA, Jang JJ, Minn KW, Lee KU. Auxiliary partial orthotopic living donor liver transplantation in a patient with alcoholic liver cirrhosis to overcome donor steatosis. Transpl Int. 2006;19:424–429. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2006.00295.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen JG, Zhang SW. Liver cancer epidemic in China: Past, present and future. Semin Cancer Biol. 2011;21:59–69. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2010.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES