Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the properties of a promising bone scaffold for bone repair, which consisted of a novel composite of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) attached to a porous β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) scaffold with platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The β-TCP powder was synthesized and its composition was determined using X-ray diffraction and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The surface morphology and microstructure of the fabricated porous β-TCP scaffold samples were analyzed using light and scanning electron microscopy, and their porosity and compressive strength were also evaluated. In addition, the viability of rabbit ADSCs incubated with various concentrations of the β-TCP extraction fluid was analyzed. The rate of attachment and the morphology of biotinylated ADSCs (Bio-ADSCs) on avidin-coated β-TCP (Avi-β-TCP), and untreated ADSCs on β-TCP, were compared. Furthermore, in vivo bone-forming abilities were determined following the implantation of group 1 (Bio-ADSCs/Avi-β-TCP) and group 2 (Bio-ADSCs/Avi-β-TCP/PRP) constructs using computed tomography, and histological osteocalcin (OCN) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression analyses in a rabbit model of mandibulofacial defects. The β-TCP scaffold exhibited a high porosity (71.26±0.28%), suitable pore size, and good mechanical strength (7.93±0.06 MPa). Following incubation with β-TCP for 72 h, 100% of viable ADSCs remained. The avidin-biotin binding system significantly increased the initial attachment rate of Bio-ADSCs to Avi-β-TCP in the first hour (P<0.01). Following the addition of PRP, group 2 exhibited a bony-union and mandibular body shape, newly formed bone and increased expression levels of OCN and ALP in the mandibulofacial defect area, as compared with group 1 (P<0.05). The results of the present study suggested that the novel Bio-ADSCs/Avi-β-TCP/PRP composite may have potential application in bone repair and bone tissue engineering.
Keywords: β-tricalcium phosphate, adipose-derived stem cells, platelet-rich plasma, biotin-avidin binding system, bone repair
Introduction
Bone tissue engineering therapy has emerged as a promising strategy for the repair of bone defects (1,2), and consists of three elements: A scaffold, cells and cytokines (3). For an ideal construct, the scaffold should be derived from homologous materials, be biodegradable and provide support for cell retention, and space for cell proliferation and matrix synthesis (4,5). In addition, the seed cells should be autologous, differentiate into osteoblasts, and enhance bone formation and angiogenesis (6,7). The cytokines must be readily produced, exhibit poor immunogenicity, and be able to promote cell proliferation and differentiation into the osteoblast lineage (8,9). Therefore, in order to meet these three requirements simultaneously, it is important to explore novel engineered bone materials.
β-Tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), which is a well-known bioactive ceramic, has been used extensively as a bone substitute due to its similarity to the mineral composition of human bone, excellent biocompatibility and osteoconductivity (10–13). In addition, β-TCP exhibits a moderate degradation rate to match the rate of osteogenesis (14,15). Furthermore, β-TCP is able to support the attachment, proliferation and differentiation of various seed cells, including osteoblasts, and adipose- and bone-marrow-derived stem cells (16,17).
Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), which are recognized as a type of mesenchymal stem cell (18), have a similar morphology, differentiation capacity, and phenotype to bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) (19). Zuk et al (20,21) initially reported the existence of a mesenchymal stromal/stem cell isolated from adipose tissue, and since then the osteogenic potential of ADSCs in vitro and in vivo has been demonstrated in numerous studies (19,22,23). As compared with BMSCs, ADSCs are easier to obtain and can be harvested in large numbers from small volumes of adipose tissue. In addition, they are associated with a lower donor site morbidity and an increased rate of growth (24,25). ADSCs have a greater potential for application due to their proliferative capacity and ability to maintain their function. Furthermore, the bone-forming capacity of ADSCs has been shown to be greater than that of BMSCs (26,27). Therefore, ADSCs are considered an excellent resource for bone tissue engineering.
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an autogenous blood fraction with high platelet concentrations that contains >300 active molecules, which influence the tissue regeneration process (28,29). PRP containing various growth factors has been widely used to enhance bone formation (30,31). Furthermore, previous studies have demonstrated that PRP combined with various biomaterials and cell sources exerts positive effects on bone regeneration (32–35). Therefore, PRP is considered to be highly beneficial to bone regeneration.
The present study aimed to investigate the properties of a novel construct for bone regeneration, which was composed of ADSCs attached to a porous β-TCP scaffold via biotin-avidin bridging and PRP. Its potential application as a scaffold for repairing bone defects was evaluated by analyzing the porosity, compressive strength, in vitro biocompatibility and in vivo bone-forming capacity in a rabbit mandibulofacial defect model.
Materials and methods
β-TCP preparation
The β-TCP powder was synthesized by a modified wet chemical precipitation reaction of 98% calcium nitrate tetra-hydrate (Ca(NO3)2•4H2O) with 99% diammonium hydrogen phosphate ((NH4)2HPO4; both Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) (36). Briefly, (NH4)2HPO4 solution was prepared at room temperature and mixed with Ca(NO3)2•4H2O powder, with agitation. The Ca:P ratio was 1:5. The pH of the mixture solution was maintained at 6.0–8.0 by adding 25% NH4OH. The obtained white suspension was stirred for 4 h and then left to precipitate for 12 h at 35°C. The synthesized precipitate was centrifuged at 3,000 × g and washed with distilled water, after which it was dried at 90°C for 24 h. Subsequently, the dried powder underwent calcination in an alumina crucible at 700°C for 2 h, in order to generate β-TCP crystals.
The crystalline phase of β-TCP was investigated using the Ultima IV X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) system (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan), using monochromated Cu Kα radiation (λ=1.5405 A°; 20 mA; 40 kV) in a continuous scan mode. The 2θ range was 5–80° at a scanning speed of 8°/min. XRD data were analyzed using the JADE 6.0 software (Materials Data, Inc., Livermore, CA, USA), and the mean crystallite size (D) was calculated from the XRD line broadening measurement using the Scherrer equation (37): D = 0.89 λ/β cosθ, where λ is the wavelength of the Cu Kα radiation, β is the full width at the half maximum of the β-TCP line, and θ is the diffraction angle.
β-TCP crystals were ground in an agate mortar, mixed with dry KBr powder, and pressed into thin tablets using a manual hydraulic press for 1 min at 16 MPa (FW-4A; Tianjin Tuopu Instrument Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China). Infrared spectra were obtained using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR; EQUINOX 55; Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) in the 400–4,000 cm-1 wavenumber range.
Porous scaffold fabrication and characterization
Porous β-TCP was prepared by mixing β-TCP powder with ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) pore-forming agent. Briefly, following drying for 24 h in a dryer, the NH4Cl powder was ground in an agate mortar and screened by progressively sieving at 200, 150, 100 and 60 µm. Filter materials with an average diameter of 150–200 µm and 60–100 µm were selected as the macroporous and microporous pore-forming agents in NH4Cl, respectively. β-TCP powder (1 g), 0.6 g macroporous pore-forming agent and 0.4 g microporous agent were transferred into a circular mould and subsequently processed by 1 min compression moulding (20 Mpa), in order to form a discoid green body (diameter, 10 mm; height, 4 mm). Upon sintering the green body using the temperature programming method, a porous β-TCP scaffold was obtained. In the temperature programming, firstly, the temperature was increased from 20 to 400°C, for 20 min at each 20°C interval, respectively. Then, the temperature was kept at 400°C for 1 h. Subsequently, the temperature was increased from 400 to 1,100°C, for 30 min at each 100°C interval, respectively. The temperature was kept at 1,100°C for 4 h, then decreased to 900°C. The temperature was kept at 900°C for 2 h, then allowed to decrease to room temperature naturally. The surface morphology and microstructure of the porous β-TCP scaffold were analyzed using a light microscope (CKX41; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and scanning electron microscope (SEM; Nova NanoSEM 600; FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA).
The porosity of the β-TCP scaffold was measured using Archimedes' Principle, as described in a previous study (38). Briefly, a specific gravity bottle filled with ethanol was weighed (W1), and a scaffold sample (WS) was immersed in the bottle in order to allow the infiltration of ethanol into the pores of the scaffold. The air trapped in the scaffold was evacuated under vacuum, after which the bottle was filled with ethanol and the weight of the bottle containing ethanol and scaffold was recorded (W2). The ethanol-saturated scaffold was then removed from the bottle, and the weight of the bottle with the residual ethanol recorded (W3). The porosity (P) was calculated according to the following equation: P = (W2-W3-Ws)/(W1-W3) × 100%.
The compressive strength of the β-TCP scaffold was measured at a loading rate of 0.5 mm/min using a universal testing machine (MB028; Quanzhou MeiBang Instrument Co., Ltd, Quanzhou, China), according to the method described in ASTM D695-91 (39). The measurements were performed five times.
Isolation and culture of rabbit ADSCs
Adult New Zealand rabbits (n=3 per group; age, 4 months; gender, male or female; weight, ~2 kg) were provided by the Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (Shanghai, China), and kept in clean condition (temperature, 16–26°C; humidity, 40–70%; food and water access, free; one cage per rabbit). These rabbits were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of 10% chloral hydrate (3.6 ml/kg; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Subsequently, the rabbits were placed in the supine position, and the inguinal fat pad was carefully dissected and minced using a sterile razor blade. Following extensive washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), the tissue was enzymatically digested using 0.1% (w/v) collagenase type I (Sigma-Aldrich), for 1 h at 37°C. The digested tissue was filtered through a 200 mesh sieve, in order to obtain a cell suspension. Following centrifugation at 1,500 × g for 7 min, the pellet was resuspended in culture media (CM), consisting of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's media (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin solution (Sigma-Aldrich). Cell cultures were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Culture media were changed every 1–2 days. Upon reaching 80–90% cell confluence, the ADSCs were detached using 0.25% trypsin containing 0.02% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and subsequently passaged. All rabbit care and experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with the Animal Care Guidelines of Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University's Animal Ethics Committee.
Surface modifications and in vitro biocompatibility
The cytotoxicity of β-TCP was investigated by culturing the ADSCs with various concentrations of β-TCP extracts and then measuring viability using the Cell Counting kit (CCK)-8 quantitative assay (Dojindo Laboratories Co., Inc., Kumamoto, Japan). The extracts were prepared by soaking the scaffold in cell CM containing 5% CO2 for 48 h at 37°C. Following filtration sterilization, the extracts were diluted with CM in order to generate serial concentration gradients (100, 50, 10 and 1%; v/v). ADSCs at passage 4 were detached using 0.25% trypsin and a 100 µl cell suspension was transferred into 96-well plates at a density of 1×105 cells/ml per well. Following an attachment period of 24 h in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37°C, the cells were cultured in the presence of 100 µl β-TCP extracts with various test concentrations. Cells cultured in CM in the absence of β-TCP served as the control. Following a 72 h incubation, the cells were washed with D-Hanks buffer solution (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), after which 200 µl CCK-8 solution was added to each well. Following a 3 h incubation at 37°C, the optical density (OD) at 450 nm was recorded using a microplate reader (RT-6000; Rayto Life and Analytical Sciences Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China). Five specimens per group were tested. The cell viability (% of control) was expressed as the percentage of (ODtest-ODblank)/(ODcontrol-ODblank), where ODtest is the OD of the cells exposed to β-TCP extract, ODcontrol is the OD of the control sample, and ODblank is the OD of the wells without ADSCs.
ADSCs were biotinylated using a commercially available reagent (3-sulfo-NHS-biotin; Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL, USA). Briefly, 0.5 mg/ml biotinylation reagent in PBS was prepared prior to the experiments, and the cells (1×106/ml) were treated with 2 ml 3-sulfo-NHS-biotin for 30 min in a CO2 incubator. The biotinylated ADSCs (Bio-ADSCs) were visualized by fluorescence microscopy (DMI4000B; Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) following incubation with avidin-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC; Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 min. The extent of biotinylation was determined using flow cytometry (Cytomics FC 500 MPL; Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA). In order to avidinylate the β-TCP scaffold (Avi-β-TCP), the sterilized scaffold was soaked in 2 mg/ml avidinylation reagent (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc.) at room temperature for 2 h.
Adherence of cells to the β-TCP scaffold
In order to assess the adherence of the cells to the β-TCP scaffold, 1×106/ml ADSCs and Bio-ADSCs were seeded onto the β-TCP and Avi-β-TCP scaffolds, respectively. Following 10 and 30 min, and 1, 12 and 24 h of incubation at 37°C, 100% humidity and 5% CO2, the cells were collected by trypsinization and were centrifuged at 1,000 × g, after which they were washed twice with PBS. Subsequently, 10 µl suspension was placed into a hemocytometer in order to measure cell adhesion under a light microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). In addition, cellular morphology and attachment were examined by direct visualization under a SEM. Briefly, following a 7 day incubation (media was changed every 2 days), the cell-scaffold constructs were removed, washed twice with PBS and fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde solution for 30 min at 4°C. Subsequently, the constructs were rinsed three times with PBS, followed by 45 min of fixation with 1% osmium tetroxide at 4°C. After rinsing three times with PBS, the fixed constructs were dehydrated and CO2-dried in a desiccator overnight. The samples were sputtered with gold for SEM observation.
Preparation of PRP
Whole blood (~40 ml) was drawn from the heart of a donor rabbit into an anticoagulant, which contained anticoagulant citrate dextrose solution formula A. PRP was obtained via a two-step centrifugation procedure (40). Briefly, whole blood was poured into a 50 ml tube and initially centrifuged at 2,400 × g for 10 min, in order to separate the platelet layer from the plasma and red blood cells. Subsequently, the upper plasma layer and the middle platelet layer were collected and centrifuged again at 3,500 × g for 15 min. The collected precipitated platelets-containing part of the plasma formed the PRP.
Bone regeneration in a rabbit mandibulofacial defect model
Following anesthetization of the rabbits with 10% chloral hydrate (3.6 ml/kg), surgical procedures were conducted under sterile conditions. The surgical field of the mandible in each rabbit was shaved and prepared with betadine solution. The mandibular angle and body were exposed via a submental midline skin incision. A full-thickness bone defect (15×5×4 mm) was created at the mid-portion of the mandible using a reciprocating saw, which was cooled continuously by saline irrigation. The in vivo experiments were divided into two groups (n=3 rabbits/group): Group 1 (Bio-ADSCs/Avi-β-TCP), in which the defect was filled with the construct consisting of Bio-ADSCs seeded onto the Avi-β-TCP scaffold; and group 2 (Bio-ADSCs/Avi-β-TCP/PRP), in which the defect was filled with the construct consisting of the Bio-ADSCs attached to the Avi-β-TCP scaffold and PRP. The constructs were prepared by incubating ~1×105 Bio-ADSCs with the Avi-β-TCP scaffold for 24 h at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. PRP solution (200 µl) was added to the constructs prior to implantation. All wounds were routinely sutured and penicillin (25,000 U/kg) was subcutaneously injected into the rabbits for 3 days post-operation. All rabbits were maintained on a soft diet throughout the study.
Computerized tomography (CT) and histological analyses
Maxillofacial CT images were obtained under general anesthesia and the three-dimensional images were reconstructed using a CT at 4 weeks post-operation (CBCT-NewTom DVT 9000; QR S.r.l., Verona, Italy).
For histological analysis, all rabbits were sacrificed by air injection into the marginal ear vein, and bone specimens were harvested from each group 4 weeks post-implantation. The constructs Bio-ADSCs/Avi-β-TCP and Bio-ADSCs/Avi-β-TCP/PRP that filled the original bone defect area were divided into two parts: Part 1 was used to obtain paraffin-embedded sections for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry; part 2 was used to generate liquid nitrogen frozen sections for PCR. Part 1 samples were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Serial tissue sections (5 µm) were obtained for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemical analysis. For immunohistochemical analysis, the deparaffinized sections were washed three times in PBS, and endogenous peroxidase was inactivated by incubation with 3% H2O2. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked using normal goat serum (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min, after which the tissue sections were incubated with mouse anti-osteocalcin (OCN) antibody (1:200; ab13420; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), overnight at 4°C. After rinsing in PBS three times, the tissue sections were incubated with biotinylated secondary antibody (1:500; Z0420; DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) at room temperature for 1 h. Peroxidase activity was visualized using 0.05% diaminobenzidine and 0.03% H2O2 in PBS. Subsequently, the tissue sections were counter-stained with hematoxylin for 2 min. At least 10 fields of vision under ×200 magnification were captured under brightfield view and images were subsequently analyzed and quantified using ImageJ software, version 1.47 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MA, USA) (41).
Analysis of mRNA expression levels of osteogenic marker genes by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
Prior to RNA extraction, specimens were homogenized under liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was isolated from each specimen using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and reverse-transcribed into cDNA using a commercial reverse transcriptase cDNA synthesis kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Dalian, China), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The relative expression levels of the specific osteogenic marker genes OCN and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were investigated. The primer sequences, which were designed using the Primer Premier 5.0 software (Premier Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA, USA), were as follows: OCN forward, 5′-GACACCATGAGGACCCTCTC-3′, reverse 3′-GGCTCCAGGGGATCTGGG-5′; and ALP forward, 5′-CAGGATTGACCACGGGCACC-3′, reverse 3′-GCCTGGTAGTTGTTGTGAGC-5′; GAPDH forward, 5′-TCGTCCTCCTCTGGTGCTCT-3′, reverse, 5′-CCACTTTGTGAAGCTCATTTCCT-3′. RT-qPCR was performed under the following cycling conditions using a CFX96 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA): 95°C for 30 sec, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 5 sec, 60°C for 20 sec, 72°C for 30 sec, and 60–90°C for 10 sec. A 1X TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix was used throughout (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA). The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene served as a normalization control. Relative expression levels were evaluated using the 2-ΔΔCq method (42). The expression levels of each target gene were analyzed in triplicate.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 19.0 (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance was applied for comparisons between groups. Differences between two groups were assessed using Tukey's post-hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Characterization of the β-TCP scaffold
The XRD pattern and FTIR spectrum of the β-TCP powder are presented in Fig. 1. The powder exhibited sharp diffraction peaks and had a similar XRD pattern to the standard pattern for β-TCP (43), indicative of a high crystallinity (Fig. 1A and B). The mean crystallite size of the particles was 31.5 nm. In the FTIR spectrum of the powder, characteristic peaks of β-TCP were detected at 551, 609, 944 and 1,043 cm-1, and the characteristic absorption bands at 1,200 and 1,000 cm-1 were assigned to components of the PO4 group (Fig. 1C).
The β-TCP powder could be sintered together effectively, and formed a porous structure containing inter-connected pores, as observed under the CKX41 light microscope (Fig. 2A and B). The SEM micrograph suggested that the porous β-TCP scaffold had high pore interconnectivity, abundant pore structures, including macropores (diameter, 200–300 µm) and micropores (size, 60–100 µm), and a large surface area (Fig. 2C and D). In addition, the porosity and compressive strength of the scaffold were 71.26±0.28% and 7.93±0.06 MPa, respectively.
Viability, attachment and morphology of the rabbit ADSCs following incubation with the β-TCP scaffold
Alterations to the viability of the ADSCs incubated with various concentrations of the β-TCP extraction fluid were assessed using the CCK-8 assay (Table I). Following 72 h of incubation, 100% ADSCs had retained their viability, suggesting that no significant loss in viability was observed, as compared with the control. At the highest extract concentration (100%, v/v) the cell viability was 107.48±10.32% of the control. These results suggest that the β-TCP scaffold does not exert toxic effects on ADSCs.
Table I.
Extract concentration (v/v; %) | Cell viability (% of control) |
---|---|
100 | 107.48±10.32 |
50 | 105.63±9.85 |
10 | 108.51±12.06 |
1 | 109.04±8.17 |
Bio-ADSCs attach to Avi-β-TCP
Following biotinylation, ADSCs were incubated with avidin-FITC. All Bio-ADSCs were green in appearance under a fluorescence microscope, whereas the untreated control cells did not exhibit fluorescence (images not shown), thus suggesting that the biotinylation procedure was successful. The degree of biotinylation was calculated to be 95% of cells using fluorescence correlation microscopy. Subsequently, the Bio-ADSCs and ADSCs were incubated with the Avi-β-TCP and β-TCP scaffolds, respectively, in order to evaluate cell adhesion (Fig. 3). In the first hour of incubation, the biotin-avidin interaction significantly enhanced the rate of cell attachment, as compared with the ADSCs/β-TCP mixture (P<0.01). After 12 h, 95.46±7.38% of Bio-ADSCs were attached to the Avi-β-TCP scaffold, which was significantly increased, as compared with the ADSCs/β-TCP group (78.29±10.63%; P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in adhesion between the two groups after 24 h of incubation (P>0.05; Fig. 3).
Morphology of ADSCs/β-TCP and Bio-ADSCs/Avi-β-TCP constructs under SEM exhibits no visible difference
All cells were attached and exhibited a morphologically normal appearance on the surface of the scaffolds following incubation for 1 day. A large number of ADSCs were firmly attached to the surface and around the pores, and a few cells were enclosed within the three-dimensional scaffolds following 4 days of incubation. At 7 days, pseudopodia extending from the cells were connected with each other and covered the pores. In addition, the cells were embedded in the interspaces of the scaffolds and the secretion of extracellular matrix (ECM) (Fig. 4A and B).
CT analysis
In order to analyze the three-dimensional structure of the repaired mandibles, 3D-CT images were captured 4 weeks post-operation. In group 1 rabbits, which received the Bio-ADSCs/Avi-β-TCP construct, only a poor bony union was achieved and the graft appeared to slide out of its groove (Fig. 5A). Conversely, in the group 2 rabbits, which received the Bio-ADSCs/Avi-β-TCP/PRP construct, a good bony union was achieved and the mandible shape resembled that of normal edentulous mandibles (Fig. 5B).
Histological analysis
Following implantation for 4 weeks, H&E staining detected neogenetic bone-like structure within the area of the Bio-ADSCs/Avi-β-TCP implant in group 1 rabbits (Fig. 6A). Conversely, in group 2 rabbits, the amount of newly formed bone was markedly increased and was shown to have integrated to form matured interwoven bone and trabecular bone (Fig. 6B).
Immunohistochemical analysis of OCN protein expression detected new bone formation within the positively-stained area (brown color), and OCN protein expression was markedly upregulated in the defect area at 4 weeks (Fig. 6C and D). In addition, the quantitative analysis suggested that the OCN protein expression was increased in the group 2 rabbits, as compared with the group 1 rabbits (87.41±9.65 vs. 67.53±11.87; P<0.05; Fig. 7).
Analysis of gene expression
The mRNA expression levels of the osteospecific genes OCN and ALP in the tissues surrounding the two graft constructs were analyzed at 4 weeks post-implantation. RT-qPCR demonstrated that the relative expression levels of OCN and ALP were significantly increased in group 2 rabbits, as compared with group 1 rabbits (OCN: 26.38±7.17 vs. 17.49±3.52; ALP: 49.62±8.34 vs. 15.12±4.21; P<0.01; Fig. 8A and B).
Discussion
Bone tissue engineering has been widely studied and typically involves combining scaffolds with various growth factors and cell sources (22). Searching for an optimal scaffold for bone regeneration remains an unsolved and interesting challenge for researchers. In the present study, the porous β-TCP scaffold exhibited a high porosity, suitable pore size and good mechanical strength. The high-affinity avidin-biotin binding system increased the initial attachment of ADSCs to β-TCP. In addition, the use of PRP significantly improved the quality of bone healing in a rabbit mandibulofacial defect model. These results suggested that the Bio-ADSCs/Avi-β-TCP/PRP composite may have potential application in bone tissue engineering.
Various material properties, including composition, geometry, porosity, size, and microstructure, are important parameters to consider when evaluating appropriate bone formation (44). Previous studies have demonstrated that a high porosity is critical for bone regeneration, as it allows sufficient void space for the ingrowth of surrounding bone and vascularized tissue (27,45,46). Furthermore, the osteogenic capability of composites has been shown to increase with increasing scaffold porosity (45). In addition, small pores may induce osteochondral formation prior to osteogenesis due to relative hypoxic conditions, whereas large pores may lead to direct osteogenesis by simultaneous vascularization due to a high oxygen content (47). Therefore, the pore size of the scaffold is an important parameter for bone tissue engineering. A previous study reported that the minimal pore size for bone regeneration was ~100 µm (48). In the present study, the β-TCP scaffold had a high porosity (71.26%) and was able to provide a suitable pore size, including 200–300 µm macropores and 60–100 µm micropores, for bone regeneration, in accordance with the results from previous studies (17,49).
The ability of seed cells to adhere to the biomaterial is a prerequisite and crucial step in various tissue engineering applications (50,51). Numerous strategies have been applied in order to improve affinities between cells and biomaterial surfaces, including ECM adhesion proteins (52), conjugating peptides containing cell-binding sequences (53), and antibodies targeting cell-membrane antigens (54). In addition, previous studies have suggested that the utilization of an avidin-biotin binding system may enhance cell adhesion to biomaterial surfaces (51,55). In the present study, biotinylated ADSCs adhered to the avidin-coated β-TCP scaffold at a faster rate, as compared with untreated cells. Furthermore, the binding system markedly enhanced the initial cell adhesion in the first hour, as previously reported (51,56). These results suggested that the avidin-biotin system may be applied to bone tissue engineering.
Previous studies have demonstrated that PRP, which is a platelet concentrate of autogenous blood, has an important role in tissue repair mechanisms and may exert potential positive effects in the course of bone formation (57–60). In addition, PRP may improve osteochondral healing (61) and increase new bone formation (57). Furthermore, PRP has demonstrated success when applied to orthopedic and dental bone reconstruction surgeries (62). The present study demonstrated that the Bio-ADSCs/Avi-β-TCP graft loaded with PRP exhibited enhanced bone regeneration and healing properties, as compared with the scaffold untreated by PRP, based on radiological, histological and gene expression analyses. These results suggested that the addition of PRP may significantly enhance new bone formation and improve the quality of bone healing.
In conclusion, the fabricated porous β-TCP scaffold had a high porosity and suitable pore size, and the utilization of an avidin-biotin binding system increased the adherence of Bio-ADSCs to the Avi-β-TCP scaffold. Furthermore, the addition of PRP increased the rate of new bone formation and improved the quality of bone healing. These results suggested that the novel Bio-ADSCs/Avi-β-TCP/PRP composite has potential application in bone repair and bone tissue engineering.
References
- 1.Damaraju S, Duncan NA. Stem cell-based tissue engineering for bone repair. In: Fernandes PR, Bartolo PJ, editors. Tissue Engineering. Vol. 31. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2014. pp. 1–30. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liu Y, Zhou Y, Feng H, Ma GE, Ni Y. Injectable tissue-engineered bone composed of human adipose-derived stromal cells and platelet-rich plasma. Biomaterials. 2008;29:3338–3345. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Buser Z, Liu J, Thorne KJ, Coughlin D, Lotz JC. Inflammatory response of intervertebral disc cells is reduced by fibrin sealant scaffold in vitro. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2014;8:77–84. doi: 10.1002/term.1503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ravichandran R, Venugopal JR, Sundarrajan S, Mukherjee S, Ramakrishna S. Precipitation of nanohydroxyapatite on PLLA/PBLG/Collagen nanofibrous structures for the differentiation of adipose derived stem cells to osteogenic lineage. Biomaterials. 2012;33:846–855. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chang NJ, Lam CF, Lin CC, Chen WL, Li CF, Lin YT, Yeh ML. Transplantation of autologous endothelial progenitor cells in porous PLGA scaffolds create a microenvironment for the regeneration of hyaline cartilage in rabbits. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:1613–1622. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Szpalski C, Barbaro M, Sagebin F, Warren SM. Bone tissue engineering: Current strategies and techniques - part. II Cell types. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2012;18:258–269. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2011.0440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Khaled EG, Saleh M, Hindocha S, Griffin M, Khan WS. Tissue engineering for bone production-stem cells, gene therapy and scaffolds. Open Orthop J. 2011;5(Suppl 2):S289–S295. doi: 10.2174/1874325001105010289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cha C, Liechty WB, Khademhosseini A, Peppas NA. Designing biomaterials to direct stem cell fate. ACS Nano. 2012;6:9353–9358. doi: 10.1021/nn304773b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mosna F, Sensebé L, Krampera M. Human bone marrow and adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells: A user's guide. Stem Cells Dev. 2010;19:1449–1470. doi: 10.1089/scd.2010.0140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Farzadi A, Solati-Hashjin M, Bakhshi F, Aminian A. Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite/β-tricalcium phosphate nanocomposites using microwave irradiation. Ceram Int. 2011;37:65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.08.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kolk A, Handschel J, Drescher W, Rothamel D, Kloss F, Blessmann M, Heiland M, Wolff KD, Smeets R. Current trends and future perspectives of bone substitute materials - from space holders to innovative biomaterials. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40:706–718. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Miyaji H, Yokoyama H, Kosen Y, Nishimura H, Nakane K, Tanaka S, Otani K, Inoue K, Ibara A, Kanayama I, et al. Bone augmentation in rat by highly porous β-TCP scaffolds with different open-cell sizes in combination with fibroblast growth factor-2. J Oral Tissue Engin. 2013;10:172–181. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zheng H, Bai Y, Shih MS, Hoffmann C, Peters F, Waldner C, Hübner WD. Effect of a β-TCP collagen composite bone substitute on healing of drilled bone voids in the distal femoral condyle of rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014;102:376–383. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rezwan K, Chen QZ, Blaker JJ, Boccaccini AR. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3413–3431. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Choi D, Kumta PN. Mechano-chemical synthesis and characterization of nanostructured β-TCP powder. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2007;27:377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2006.05.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Griffin M, Iqbal S, Bayat A. Exploring the application of mesenchymal stem cells in bone repair and regeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:427–434. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B4.25249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cao H, Kuboyama N. A biodegradable porous composite scaffold of PGA/beta-TCP for bone tissue engineering. Bone. 2010;46:386–395. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.09.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Guasti L, Prasongchean W, Kleftouris G, Mukherjee S, Thrasher AJ, Bulstrode NW, Ferretti P. High plasticity of pediatric adipose tissue-derived stem cells: Too much for selective skeletogenic differentiation? Stem Cells Transl Med. 2012;1:384–395. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2012-0009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Levi B, Longaker MT. Concise review: Adipose-derived stromal cells for skeletal regenerative medicine. Stem Cells. 2011;29:576–582. doi: 10.1002/stem.612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zuk PA, Zhu M, Mizuno H, Huang J, Futrell JW, Katz AJ, Benhaim P, Lorenz HP, Hedrick MH. Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: Implications for cell-based therapies. Tissue Eng. 2001;7:211–228. doi: 10.1089/107632701300062859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zuk PA, Zhu M, Ashjian P, De Ugarte DA, Huang JI, Mizuno H, Alfonso ZC, Fraser JK, Benhaim P, Hedrick MH. Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13:4279–4295. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E02-02-0105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liao HT, Chen JP, Lee MY. Bone tissue engineering with adipose-derived stem cells in bioactive composites of laser-sintered porous polycaprolactone scaffolds and platelet-rich plasma. Materials. 2013;6:4911–4929. doi: 10.3390/ma6114911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fang X, Murakami H, Demura S, Hayashi K, Matsubara H, Kato S, Yoshioka K, Inoue K, Ota T, Shinmura K, Tsuchiya H. A novel method to apply osteogenic potential of adipose derived stem cells in orthopaedic surgery. PloS One. 2014;9:e88874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ahn HH, Kim KS, Lee JH, Lee JY, Kim BS, Lee IW, Chun HJ, Kim JH, Lee HB, Kim MS. In vivo osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells in an injectable in situ-forming gel scaffold. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15:1821–1832. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Grottkau BE, Lin Y. Osteogenesis of adipose-derived stem cells. Bone Res. 2013;1:133–145. doi: 10.4248/BR201302003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rehman J, Traktuev D, Li J, Merfeld-Clauss S, Temm-Grove CJ, Bovenkerk JE, Pell CL, Johnstone BH, Considine RV, March KL. Secretion of angiogenic and antiapoptotic factors by human adipose stromal cells. Circulation. 2004;109:1292–1298. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121425.42966.F1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liao HT, Chen CT. Osteogenic potential: Comparison between bone marrow and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. World J Stem Cells. 2014;6:288–295. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v6.i3.288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nurden AT. Platelets, inflammation and tissue regeneration. Thromb Haemost. 2011;105(Suppl 1):S13–S33. doi: 10.1160/THS10-11-0720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nurden AT, Nurden P, Sanchez M, Andia I, Anitua E. Platelets and wound healing. Front Biosci. 2008;13:3532–3548. doi: 10.2741/2947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Marx RE. Platelet-rich plasma: Evidence to support its use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:489–496. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Marx RE, Carlson ER, Eichstaedt RM, Schimmele SR, Strauss JE, Georgeff KR. Platelet-rich plasma: Growth factor enhancement for bone grafts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;85:638–646. doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90029-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Niemeyer P, Fechner K, Milz S, Richter W, Suedkamp NP, Mehlhorn AT, Pearce S, Kasten P. Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow and adipose tissue for bone regeneration in a critical size defect of the sheep tibia and the influence of platelet-rich plasma. Biomaterials. 2010;31:3572–3579. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mazzocca AD, McCarthy MB, Chowaniec DM, Dugdale EM, Hansen D, Cote MP, Bradley JP, Romeo AA, Arciero RA, Beitzel K. The positive effects of different platelet-rich plasma methods on human muscle, bone and, tendon cells. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:1742–1749. doi: 10.1177/0363546512452713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.El Backly RM, Zaky SH, Muraglia A, Tonachini L, Brun F, Canciani B, Chiapale D, Santolini F, Cancedda R, Mastrogiacomo M. A platelet-rich plasma-based membrane as a periosteal substitute with enhanced osteogenic and angiogenic properties: properties. A platelet-rich plasma-based membrane as a periosteal substitute with enhanced osteogenic and angiogenic properties: A new concept for bone repair. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;19:152–165. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang C, Zhong D, Zhou X, Yin K, Liao Q, Kong L, Liu A. Preparation of a new composite combining strengthened β-tricalcium phosphate with platelet-rich plasma as a potential scaffold for the repair of bone defects. Exp Ther Med. 2014;8:1081–1086. doi: 10.3892/etm.2014.1912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mirhadi B, Mehdikhani B, Askari N. Synthesis of nano-sized β-tricalcium phosphate via wet precipitation. Processing and Application of Ceramics. 2011;5:193–198. doi: 10.2298/PAC1104193M. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Monshi A, Foroughi MR, Monshi MR. Modified Scherrer equation to estimate more accurately nano-crystallite size using XRD. World J Nano Sci Eng. 2012;2:154. doi: 10.4236/wjnse.2012.23020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tran RT, Thevenot P, Zhang Y, Gyawali D, Tang L, Yang J. Scaffold sheet design strategy for soft tissue engineering. Nat Mater. 2010;3:1375–1389. doi: 10.3390/ma3021375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Annual Book of ASTM Standards. 8th. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 1993. American Society of the International Association for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International: ASTM Standard D695-91: Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid plastics; pp. 204–210. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jeong SM, Lee CU, Son JS, Oh JH, Fang Y, Choi BH. Simultaneous sinus lift and implantation using platelet-rich fibrin as sole grafting material. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42:990–994. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:1101–1108. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Frondel C. Mineralogy of the calcium phosphates in insular phosphate rock. Am Mineral. 1943;28:215–232. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yuan H, Yang Z, De Bruij JD, De Groot K, Zhang X. Material-dependent bone induction by calcium phosphate ceramics: A 2.5-year study in dog. Biomaterials. 2001;22:2617–2623. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00450-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Okamoto M, Dohi Y, Ohgushi H, Shimaoka H, Ikeuchi M, Matsushima A, Yonemasu K, Hosoi H. Influence of the porosity of hydroxyapatite ceramics on in vitro and in vivo bone formation by cultured rat bone marrow stromal cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006;17:327–336. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-8232-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Annaz B, Hing K, Kayser M, Buckland T, Di Silvio L. Porosity variation in hydroxyapatite and osteoblast morphology: A scanning electron microscopy study. J Microsc. 2004;215:100–110. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-2720.2004.01354.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2005;26:5474–5491. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hulbert SF, Young FA, Mathews RS, Klawitter JJ, Talbert CD, Stelling FH. Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res. 1970;4:433–456. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820040309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yuan J, Cui L, Zhang WJ, Liu W, Cao YL. Repair of canine mandibular bone defects with bone marrow stromal cells and porous β-tricalcium phosphate. Biomaterials. 2007;6:1005–1013. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kasemo B. Biological surface science. Surf Sci. 2002;500:656–677. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01809-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tsai WB, Wang MC. Effects of an avidin-biotin binding system on chondrocyte adhesion and growth on biodegradable polymers. Macromol Biosci. 2005;5:214–221. doi: 10.1002/mabi.200400144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Balcells M, Edelman ER. Effect of pre-adsorbed proteins on attachment, proliferation, and function of endothelial cells. J Cell Physiol. 2002;191:155–161. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Massia SP, Hubbell JA. Human endothelial cell interactions with surface-coupled adhesion peptides on a nonadhesive glass substrate and two polymeric biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:223–242. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820250209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Dekker A, Poot AA, van Mourik JA, Workel MP, Beugeling T, Bantjes A, Feijen J, Van Aken WG. Improved adhesion and proliferation of human endothelial cells on polyethylene precoated with monoclonal antibodies directed against cell membrane antigens and extracellular matrix proteins. Thromb Haemost. 1991;66:715–724. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sinclair J, Salem AK. Rapid localized cell trapping on biodegradable polymers using cell surface derivatization and microfluidic networking. Biomaterials. 2006;27:2090–2094. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bhat V, Truskey G, Reichert WM. Using avidin-mediated binding to enhance initial endothelial cell attachment and spreading. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;40:57–65. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<57::AID-JBM7>3.3.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Poeschl PW, Ziya-Ghazvini F, Schicho K, Buchta C, Moser D, Seemann R, Ewers R, Schopper C. Application of platelet-rich plasma for enhanced bone regeneration in grafted sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:657–664. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.04.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Albanese A, Licata ME, Polizzi B, Campisi G. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in dental and oral surgery: From the wound healing to bone regeneration. Immun Ageing. 2013;10:23. doi: 10.1186/1742-4933-10-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Khairy N, Shendy E, Askar N, El-Rouby DH. Effect of platelet rich plasma on bone regeneration in maxillary sinus augmentation (randomized clinical trial) Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42:249–255. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mifune Y, Matsumoto T, Takayama K, Ota S, Li H, Meszaros LB, Usas A, Nagamune K, Gharaibeh B, Fu FH, Huard J. The effect of platelet-rich plasma on the regenerative therapy of muscle derived stem cells for articular cartilage repair. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:175–185. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sun Y, Feng Y, Zhang CQ, Chen SB, Cheng XG. The regenerative effect of platelet-rich plasma on healing in large osteochondral defects. Int Orthop. 2010;34:589–597. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0793-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Intini G. The use of platelet-rich plasma in bone reconstruction therapy. Biomaterials. 2009;30:4956–4966. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]