Abstract
Coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) is a frequent finding in patients with coronary artery disease. It remains one of the most challenging subsets, accounting for 10-20% of all percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Although remarkable progress in PCI has been made, it is reasonable to state that successful recanalization of CTO represents the “last frontier” of PCI. PCI of CTOs has been limited historically by technical success rates of 50-70%. The introduction of enhanced guidewires, microcatheter, channel dilatator with increasing operator experience, and innovative techniques such as the retrograde approach have raised hopes for better outcomes. This article goes into depth into various strategies of retrograde approach in CTO.
Keywords: Chronic total occlusion, percutaneous coronary intervention, retrograde approach
INTRODUCTION
It has been demonstrated that successful recanalization of CTO improves angina status, increases exercise capacity, and reduces mortality [1, 2] and the need for subsequent coronary artery bypass surgery [3]. Despite remarkable progress over the last decades, successful recanalization of CTOs represents the “final frontier” of PCI. PCI of this subset of lesions is still technically challenging although new devices and a wide range of guidewires have been developed [4, 5]. The technical success rate for CTO via the antegrade approach remains suboptimal, in the range of 65%-70% worldwide [1, 6]. However, retrograde approach via collateral channel (CC) overcomes the limitations of the conventional antegrade approach. When it becomes more widely adopted it is expected to be a breakthrough to potentially improve the success rate of complex CTO [7-9]. Despite this, adoption of this technique is limited. Retrograde procedure is used in only 15% of CTO PCI as suggested by the EuroCTO registry [10].
INDICATIONS FOR RETROGRADE APPROACH
Retrograde access via donor collateral (bypass graft) was first performed in 1990 [11]. A higher success rate upto 95% could be achieved from the combination of antegrade and retrograde approach. Angiographic features of blunt occlusion with a large side branch, bridging collaterals, calcification, and long CTO are no longer considered negative predictors of success while using a retrograde approach [12]. Possible indications of this new approach could be subsets of previous antegrade failures. It could be the primary procedure in many situations like ostial occlusions, long occlusions, heavy calcification, occlusions with ambiguous proximal cap, and occlusions with a diffusely diseased distal vessel. Retrograde penetration of the distal CTO cap may be easier because it is tapered and softer as compared to the proximal cap; also, it is not reliant upon precise visualization of CTO origin, and is exposed to higher pressure, where the proximal cap is blunt or less benign.
ANGIOGRAPHIC/ASSESSMENT AND SELECTION COLLATERAL CHANNEL ANALYSIS
The first key to success of the retrograde approach is to study the diagnostic images carefully and select a best CC. Optimal angiographic planning requires dual injections from both left and right coronary ostia with complete filling of the distal collateral bed from all feeding sources. Lower magnification and avoiding panning considerably helps in evaluating CCs. The distal vessel size, nature of the proximal and distal cap, side branches, tortuosity, and calcification are other critical items of information that are gained from the angiogram.
The three types of CCs are bypass graft, epicardial channels, and septal channels.
In severely degenerated saphenous vein graft cases, it is necessary to recanalize CTO of the native coronary artery to improve long-term outcome. Despite the poor suitability of graft for PCI, it can be used as a channel for wire passage. An arterial graft could also be used for the retrograde conduit.
Septal CCs are the safest and are preferable whenever possible. Compared with the epicardial, the septal CC is a shorter route to the recipient vessel and is less tortuous. It can also be dilated using a small balloon (1.25-1.5 mm) with very low pressure (up to 2 atm) to navigate the catheter through it without major adverse clinical events [13]. At present, the Corsair catheter (Asahi Intec, Japan) circumvents septal CCs dilatation with a small balloon. Excessive septal tortuosity is a severe limitation to wire advancement whereas size is less so. Straight faintly visible or even invisible septal CCs could be crossed by “surfing” with the wire [14]. The angle of entry, angle of donor vessel and at the base of the heart, if acute, could be a significant limitation to both wire and microcatheter passage. These CCs are best evaluated in a combination of right anterior oblique (RAO) or anteroposterior cranial (AP) and RAO projections.
As opposed to septal CCs, the main assessment criteria for epicardial CCs is a size and not the extent of tortuosity. Challenging anatomy, such as a corkscrew or highly tortuous configuration demonstrated by epicardial CCs, is not a contraindication, especially in the Corsair era. In general, larger epicardial CCs are safer and more likely to permit a balloon or microcatheter. There is some risk of perforation during wire manipulation which could be controlled by simple ballooning at the proximal site. Dilatation of this CC should not be done as it leads to vessel rupture and cardiac tamponade. However, the chance for tamponade is lower during wiring of the epicardial CC in a patient with bypass graft as there is no pericardial space. When this channel is the only donor artery to a viable CTO region, wire manipulation leads to distant ischemia.
SYSTEM SETUP
Two 6-8 F guiding catheters are usually engaged in the right and left coronary arteries via radial or femoral arteries. Use of bi-femoral or radial route is a matter of operator preference and experience with knowledge of risks/benefit of both. For retrograde limb, use of short (90cm) guiding catheters (especially when using epicardial CCs) allowing the externalization of the wire, is recommended. A regular 100 cm guide catheter can be manually shortened and connected to a 1F smaller introducer sheath [15]. Removing 10 cm is usually sufficient. Because of reversibility, heparin is the anticoagulation of choice. An activated clotting time (ACT) of 300 to 350 seconds should be targeted. Bivaluridin or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists are not recommended because of concerns in case of perforation.
COLLATERAL CROSSING AND GUIDEWIRE HANDLING
Successful collateral crossing depends on CC selection, wire tip curve, and wire handling.
The best CC would be clearly visible, less tortuous collaterals by super-selective injection, exemplified by Dr. Werner’s CC grade 1 or 2 (Fig. 1A and 1B) (CCs are graded as follows: CC0, no continuous connection, CC1, continuous thread-like connection; and CC2, continuous, small sidebranch-like connection) [7]. Acute angulation, branching, cork-screw morphology, and calcification are major hurdles for wire crossing [12]. It would be wise to avoid severe corkscrew-like collaterals, which are characterized by an amplitude to diameter ratio of less than 2. Suitable for CC crossing, the best spring coil wires are Sion and Sion blue (Asahi Intec, Japan); polymer jacket wires are Fielder FC, XT, XTR (Asahi Intec, Japan), Pilot 50, and Whisper (Abbott vascular, USA). Fielder FC would be of choice in CC 1 or 2. Fielder XT, XTR or Sion (Asahi Intec, Japan) wire would be recommended in less visible, minor tortuosity on CC 0 or 1. Sion blue (Asahi Intec, Japan) can help to track very tiny or invisible CCs, or CCs with three-dimensional tortuosity.
An extremely small tip (< 1mm) curve (450) is recommended for CC navigation. After a wire access to the selected CC, the microcatheter [Corsair (Asahi Intec, Japan), Fine cross (Terumo, Japan)] is placed at the start of the CC. Although choice of microcatheter depends on operator preference, currently Corsair is the microcatheter of choice. After the position has been secured, the workhorse wire is exchanged with an appropriate polymer jacket (tapered or non-tapered) or spring coil wire to cross the CC.
The Corsair is an over the wire (OTW) hybrid catheter composed of 8 thin wires wound with 2 large ones. It has a soft tapered tip with tungsten braiding and a hydrophilic shaft which serves as a CC dilator while providing exceptional CC tracking and crossing as well as retrograde wire control. Gentle rotation of this catheter is required to advance or pull it by either clockwise or counterclockwise rotation. It is performed by 5-10 alternating clockwise and counterclockwise rotations while providing forward tension. Rotation should be limited to 10 times in one direction. In case of failure to cross or blockage of the Corsair, it should be exchanged for a low-profile microcatheter (Finecross, Terumo, Japan) or an OTW balloon (Ryujin 1.25 mm x 10 mm Terumo, Japan; Lacross 1.30 mm x 10 mm, Goodman, Japan or Maverick 1.50 mm x 15 mm, Boston Scientific, USA) with a longer shaft (>145 cm) by using extension guidewire or the counter flush method. From the very beginning, the Finecross should be the microcatheter of choice for a very tortuous epicardial channel. The author prefers the newly developed Finecross GT (Asahi Intec, Japan) for locating channels with small bends.
Once the wire is positioned at the tip of the corsair catheter, it is gently advanced with rotation along the path of least resistance (surfing) in case of septal CCs and should halt once a series of ventricular beats has developed or migration to the side branch is noted. The wire is quickly redirected to find an alternative CCs in case of resistance. Forceful advancement of the wire could lead to CC rupture, vessel perforation, and septal hematoma which might be fatal. In doubtful wire position there is selective injection (advancement of microcatheter with pulling the back of the wire) of the contrast (as little as 2 ml); if a wash out of the contrast is revealed, the CC is connected to the other ventricle. Wire advancement in to the left or right ventricle is benign as long as the microcatheter is not advanced. When the contrast stays in the channel, it infers focal perforation. Selective injection is the last resort after several surfing attempts have failed, as it increases the risk of septal rupture and hematoma. During septal surfing, the wrong path is also assessed by wire buckling. On occasion, there are sudden rapid and large deviations in wire-tip movement indicating entry into a cardiac chamber. Septal hematoma, manifesting as severe chest pain, may lead to a fatal event if not treated adequately, such as by coil embolization of septal CC or creation of a fistula connecting to the ventricle [14].
In case of epicardial CC, surfing is not advisable. Divergence from the observed path may lead to perforation which is more problematic than septal rupture.
CONNECTING THE ANTEGRADE AND RETROGRADE CHANNEL
Retrograde penetration is attempted with a guidewire such as a Fielder XT (Asahi Intec, Japan) from the distal cap of a CTO lesion with the support of a microcatheter. If it fails, it should be exchanged for an Ultimate Bro 3, Miracle 3, 6 and 12 (Asahi Intec, Japan) and is advanced in a retrograde manner to the most proximal part possible. The recently introduced Gaia 2(Asahi Intec, Japan) is effective for retrograde tracking of true lumen. If the distal cap is very hard and calcified, Conquest Pro or Conquest Pro 12 (Asahi Intec, Japan) should be used. While keeping the retrograde approach in place, an antegrade approach is also commenced. After successful penetration of the tip of the retrograde guidewire into the CTO lesion, one or a combination of the following different strategies is used [9, 16].
RETROGRADE WIRE CROSSING TECHNIQUE
When a wire crosses the entire occlusion in a retrograde manner, it is called “retrograde wire crossing”. After deeply negotiating the retrograde wire into the aorta or the antegrade guide, it can be anchored by inflating a small balloon (2-2.5 mm) within the antegrade guide catheter to facilitate crossing of the occlusion with the Corsair (Figs. 2, 3). If this fails, the Corsair is exchanged for a 1.25 or 1.5 mm OTW balloon, which usually has a smaller crossing profile than the Corsair to perform the retrograde balloon dilatation in the occlusion so that any subsequent procedure can be accomplished in the antegrade manner. This is the simplest way of all the retrograde techniques and can be achieved in 30% of cases, but it is the view of the author that the success rate could be 50% with appropriate wire escalation. When direct retrograde wire crossing fails, other techniques to connect the antegrade and retrograde channels are the kissing wire, controlled antegrade and retrograde subintimal tracking (CART) technique, Reverse CART, and knuckle wire technique (KWT).
KISSING WIRE TECHNIQUE
The retrograde wire is advanced to the proximal part within the CTO lesion. If the tip of this guidewire approaches the proximal cap of the CTO with its tip in alignment with the antegrade guidewire, both the antegrade and retrograde guidewires (Figs. 4, 5) meet (kiss) [17] (Fig. 1). However, it is difficult to align both wires inside the occluded true channel as there are many diseased layers inside the occlusion.
THE CART TECHNIQUE
The CART technique consists of antegrade wiring through the CTO where retrograde balloon creates a local subintimal dissection for facilitating wire crossing to the distal true lumen [18]. At first, a wire is advanced antegradely, trying to cross the CTO. If the wire has entered the subintimal space, it is left in this position. A second wire is advanced in a retrograde manner through the CC under the support of a microcatheter. This wire is positioned at the distal end of the CTO, then penetrated retrogradely from the distal true lumen into the CTO, and finally into the subintimal space at the CTO site. A small balloon (1.5-2 mm) is advanced over the retrograde wire into the subintimal space; it is then dilated in the same space and also on the course from this subintimal space to the proximal cap of the CTO. The deflated balloon should be left in place to keep this subintimal space open. This enables two dissections (created by antegrade wire and the retrograde balloon) to lie in the subintimal space at the CTO site. Thereafter, the antegrade wire is advanced further along the deflated retrograde balloon that lies from the subintimal space to the distal true lumen (Fig. 6). Then ballooning and stent implantation can be performed over the antegrade wire [19]. The advantage of this technique is the minimization of just subintimal tracking through the length of the CTO lesion. The limitation is that, it is not always possible to negotiate a retrograde balloon inside the occlusion, particularly in complex CTO lesions. Subintimal space extending to the proximal true lumen of the CTO may cause a fatal event when the CTO is located in the proximal part of the left coronary system (e.g. dissection of the left main) [20]. Other limitations are empiric estimation of retrograde balloon size and unpredictable procedure time. It is advisable to use the closest sized balloon inside the CTO to create sufficient wire re-entry space. With introduction of the Corsair microcatheter the CART technique is rarely employed except in some cases of ostial occlusions, heavily calcified occlusions, and when the microcatheter is unable to enter the occlusion.
REVERSE CART TECHNIQUE
The reverse CART technique consists of dilatating the CTO lesion with the balloon through the antegrade wire followed by retrograde wire being advanced into the space dilated with the antegrade balloon [21]. A wire is negotiated in a retrograde manner into the distal cap of the CTO and another is advanced antegradely in the proximal cap of the CTO. The retrograde wire is advanced into the subintimal space into the CTO lesion. The subintimal space created by antegrade wire is enlarged by inflating a balloon to create a plaque dissection and modification of the lesion which is target space for retrograde wire penetration into the proximal true lumen. Next, the retrograde wire is externalized through the guide and is used for subsequent antegrade angioplasty (Figs. 7,8). The tip of retrograde microcatheter should be in the mid portion of the antegrade balloon. Before balloon inflation, the balloon and retrograde microcatheter may lie 4 to 5 mm apart on fluoroscopy, yet they are both in subintimal space. With balloon inflation, the two subintimal spaces become one space. There should be no space between the balloon and the retrograde microcatheter. If a gap exists, there remains tissue between the two and the common space does not exist. In this scenario, either a higher inflation pressure is required or a larger diameter balloon needs to be used. On deflation of the balloon, the retrograde support catheter can be seen “drooping” into the common space created indicating a continuous pathway from distal true lumen, through the subintimal space, and into the proximal true lumen. This technique is predictable and reproducible as compared to classical CART. Undersizing of the antegrade balloon makes the creation of a common subintimal space much more difficult. The subintimal space may either compress or collapse after antegrade balloon inflation or deflation, making the true lumen wiring more difficult even with continuous subintimal connection. The “Stent Reverse CART” technique entails deployment of a stent within the antegrade dissected plane to create an open target for retrograde crossing [14]. An alternative method is to use a Guideliner mother-in-child catheter (Vascular solutions, Minneapolis, MN, USA) into the space to help connect the retrograde wire to the antegrade guide (Mother-in-child Reverse CART) [14]. Unlike a stent, a catheter may be removed or repositioned if the connection between the antegrade and the retrograde true lumen fails.
Recoil of subintimal channel may occur even after successfully connecting the channel between the antegrade and retrograde space. Moreover, blind medial disruption with the antegrade balloon potentially causes bidirectional expansion of the subintimal dissection making retrograde wire crossing difficult. The intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) estimates optimal antegrade balloon size that avoids risk of perforation. A smaller size balloon should be used in presence of calcified plaque. If IVUS indicates the recoil of a connecting channel, redilatation with a bigger balloon should be performed. IVUS also directly visualizes the position of retrograde wire in the subintima [21]. The retrograde wire could be navigated into proximal true lumen under IVUS (IVUS-guided reverse CART) [22]. An important precaution is to avoid contrast injections after creating antegrade subintimal dissection until the last stent is deployed to prevent pressurized contrast injection into the dilated segment causing a spiral dissection or hematoma.
THE KWT TECHNIQUE
The KWT technique is employed in case of failure of retrograde wire escalation or when the CTO is quite long with vessel ambiguity. This entails creating a small loop with retrograde polymer jacketed wire Fielder FC, XT (Asahi Intec, Japan) or Pilot 200 (Abbott Vascular, USA), which is advanced inside the occlusion and creates subintimal space so that antegrade wire in the subintima can be led inside this space. The antegrade KWT can be combined with retrograde KWT in complex CTO lesions. The limitations of this technique are such that a longitudinal dissected plane cannot be controlled and the cross-sectional dissected wire is not wide enough to lead the antegrade wire [23]. Knuckle wire should be pushed, but never rotated for fear of wire knotting.
WIRE TRAPPING TECHNIQUE
After retrograde wire crossing, the antegrade wire can be trapped in the distal lumen by an inflated balloon to create an extra back up force for balloon crossing or stent delivery. In retrograde wire crossing or reverse CART technique, retrograde wire can be trapped in the proximal lumen or in the guide catheter for easy passage of retrograde balloon inside the occlusion.
After the retrograde wire enters the ascending aorta, a gooseneck microsnare (Amplatz, USA) is inserted and snares the retrograde wire tip from the aorta into the antegrade guiding catheter. The microsnare is pulled back slowly and carefully until retrograde wire is pulled out of the antegrade guiding catheter. The balloon and stent can be delivered over retrograde wire to recanalize the occlusion [24].
REVERSE WIRE TRAPPING TECHNIQUE
After crossing the CTO lesion, entering the ascending aorta, and being snared by the antegrade microsnare, the retrograde wire is drawn back, dragging the microsnare tip to advance through the occlusion simultaneously. After the microsnare and microcatheter have crossed the lesion antegradely, the retrograde wire is released. Afterwards the microsnare is drawn back and exchanged for an antegrade wire followed by balloon dilatation and stent implantation [25].
THE RENDEZVOUS (BRIDGE) TECHNIQUE
In this technique, antegrade and retrograde microcatheters are aligned in a guide catheter at the level of the ascending aorta, after which an antegrade wire is pulled into a retrograde microcatheter. The antegrade wire is advanced further down beyond the CTO site through the retrograde microcatheter [26]. This bridge technique could be used in case of failure of advancement of antegrade wire, whereas retrograde wire can be negotiated using a microcatheter. This can also be applied in cases of large dissection and uncertainty in the movement of wire, or in cases where CCs are small and not ideal for large retrograde balloon dilatation. This can replace wire externalization by 300-cm wire.
DOUBLE BALLOON INFLATION
Two overlapping balloons inserted in the retrograde and antegrade subintimal spaces are inflated simultaneously to join the subintimal spaces together with confluence in Reverse CART technique. This allows the retrograde wire to pass easily through this newly created confluent subintimal space and then finally into true lumen [27].
EXTERNALIZATION
The crossing wire is exchanged for an externalization wire after a microcatheter is delivered into the antegrade guide. The externalization of the retrograde wire must be carried out with utmost care. The retrograde guide catheter may be deep throated; this needs to be avoided to prevent ostial damage. While advancing the stiffer shaft of the retrograde wire into the CC, the collateral needs to be protected by the presence of the microcatheter.
Several workhorse wires come in ≥ 300 cm (300-cm Pilot 200 wire, Abbott Vascular, USA; 325 cm Rota floppy, Boston Scientific, USA; 335 cm Viper, CSI, St Paul, Minnesota; 300 cm RG3, Fielder FC, Asahi Intec, Japan) for externalization. The Viper wire is extraordinarily stiff, and is often difficult to pass through very tortuous CCs. This has been overcome by flushing the channel dilator with Rotaglide solution (Boston Scientific, USA) before the externalization wire is inserted. The shaft of the Rota floppy wire is only 0.009” in diameter, and is easily kinkable. It should be used as a last resort if no other long wires are available. RG3 wire has emerged as an ideal guidewire. However, the shaft is not as stiff as a standard coronary wire and therefore it gives less support to balloons and stents after externalization.
Despite coaxial antegrade guide, retrograde passage of wire into guide fails in conditions such as in aorto-ostial lesions or extremely tortuous vessels, or whenever there is poor retrograde wire control. Difficulty in wiring the antegrade guide can be overcome by snaring. The 3-snare system, referred to as tulip snare (EN Snare; Merit Medical Systems, South Jordan, USA), is the most useful snaring system for externalization of wire during retrograde procedure. The larger the snare the better it is. An 18x30 mm EN Snare, which is 6 French compatible, is preferred [28, 29].
FINAL TREATMENT
Once the externalized wire approaches the antegrade guiding hub, the operator needs to detach the copilot, place a finger over the hub of antegrade guide, and wait for retrograde wire to tap it. Retrograde wire is pushed 5 to 7 cm out of the guide, once the tap is felt. Then a wire introducer is placed into antegrade copilot and the externalized soft tip of the wire is threaded. Introducer and copilot over the wire are slided and reconnected without flushing. Flushing after reverse CART can result in hydraulic dissection. Ballooning and stenting is performed after 20 to 30 cm wire is externalized. Retrograde injection is used for a distal landing zone for stents. Externalized wire in a tortuous artery should always be protected with a catheter. The stiff part of the wire should be under cover of a channel dilator or channel-crossing catheter. The end of the externalized wire should never be pulled unless the CC is protected. However, pushing is always permitted but still it needs to be done with protection of the CCs [14, 30].
REMOVAL OF THE EXTERNALIZED WIRE AND CORSAIR CHANNEL DILATOR
To remove the wire, the channel dilator should be readvanced into the antegrade guide. It must protect the CC until the soft wire tip is back in the CC. Both antegrade and retrograde guiding catheters are disengaged from the coronary ostium and pulled back 3 to 4 cm into the aorta to avoid ostial dissection because of externalized wire retraction. After establishing guiding catheter control, the externalized wire is removed and gradually synchronized with the heart beat taking care not to kink it. Then the channel dilator is removed with clockwise rotation. However, some operators advocate leaving some part of the wire within the channel dilator to retract it so that CC can be assessed in the event of its rupture that could otherwise manage this complication rapidly. Once the retrograde system has been removed successfully, a careful angiographic demonstration of the integrity of the CCs, as well as checking for extravasations, needs to be performed via the retrograde catheter.
COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROCEDURE
Specific complications pertaining to retrograde approach are CC rupture, thrombus formation, and global ischemia. Most CC ruptures are benign and do not require further treatment [11] apart from abandoning that CC and trying for another. The channel dilator is safer than a balloon and rarely causes CC dissection or perforation even in CC with excessive tortuosity. While advancing the microcatheter, if septal wire shows excessive kinking, the wire has to be withdrawn to prevent septal perforation [29]. If there is small septal perforation to the right or left ventricle, observation can be made. Septal hematoma or cardiac tamponade needs embolic occlusion via microcatheter. Before pulling out the retrograde wire, the donor artery should be visualized with the externalized wire in place. Then a microcatheter from both ends of the wire would allow access to a bleeding point.
Thrombus formation is prevented by saline flush of the guide catheter and by maintenance of ACT >300 seconds and checked every 20-30 min. Global ischemia can be minimized by careful manipulation of retrograde wire. Stenting should be done if there is significant stenosis to the CC of the donor artery. Catheter induced dissection occurs when the retrograde devices are withdrawn. This could be prevented by constant pulling of the guide catheter to disengage from the ostium, while gentle rotation (in either direction) of the channel dilator is performed to withdraw it.
CONCLUSION
A growing body of evidence demonstrates that successful PCI of CTO translates into clinical benefit. However, because of the perceived procedural complexity, CTO still is the most common reason for discarding PCI. The proven clinical benefit, as well as the improved long-term patency with drug-eluting stents, has resulted in a growing interest among interventionists for treating CTOs. Tremendous improvements in the PCI equipment, and the development of innovative strategies including the retrograde techniques, have allowed for a success rate of up to 95%, even in complex CTO cases. With the application of the soft polymer-coated wires, IVUS, and channel dilators like Corsair, more and more would be managed by reverse CART, while conventional CART is still likely to be needed in ostial occlusions, heavily calcified occlusions, and if the microcatheter is unable to enter the occlusions. Collaborative efforts to share experience of this retrograde technique and overcome challenges through refinement in technique and technology would be pivotal to further success in CTO PCI.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Declared none.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The author confirms that this article content has no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ivanhoe R.J., Weintraub W.S., Douglas J.S., Jr, Lembo N.J., Furman M., Gershony G., Cohen C.L., King S.B., III Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of chronic total occlusions. Primary success, restenosis, and long-term clinical follow-up. Circulation. 1992;85(1):106–115. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.85.1.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Suero J.A., Marso S.P., Jones P.G., Laster S.B., Huber K.C., Giorgi L.V., Johnson W.L., Rutherford B.D. Procedural outcomes and long-term survival among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of a chronic total occlusion in native coronary arteries: a 20-year experience. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001;38(2):409–414. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01349-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Warren R.J., Black A.J., Valentine P.A., Manolas E.G., Hunt D. Coronary angioplasty for chronic total occlusion reduces the need for subsequent coronary bypass surgery. Am. Heart J. 1990;120(2):270–274. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(90)90069-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hoye A., van Domburg R.T., Sonnenschein K., Serruys P.W. Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions: the Thoraxcenter experience 1992-2002. Eur. Heart J. 2005;26(24):2630–2636. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Saito S., Tanaka S., Hiroe Y., Miyashita Y., Takahashi S., Satake S., Tanaka K. Angioplasty for chronic total occlusion by using tapered-tip guidewires. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2003;59(3):305–311. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ruocco N.A., Jr, Ring M.E., Holubkov R., et al. Results of coronary angioplasty of chronic total occlusions (the National Heart, Lung and Registry). Am. J. Cardiol. 1992;85:106–115. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90678-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Werner G.S., Ferrari M., Heinke S., Kuethe F., Surber R., Richartz B.M., Figulla H.R. Angiographic assessment of collateral connections in comparison with invasively determined collateral function in chronic coronary occlusions. Circulation. 2003;107(15):1972–1977. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000061953.72662.3A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sheiban I., Moretti C., Omedé P., Sciuto F., Bollati M., Laudito A., Trevi G.P., Biondi-Zoccai G.G. The retrograde coronary approach for chronic total occlusions: mid-term results and technical tips & tricks. J. Interv. Cardiol. 2007;20(6):466–473. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00292.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Saito S. Different strategies of retrograde approach in coronary angioplasty for chronic total occlusion. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2008;71(1):8–19. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Galassi A.R., Tomasello S.D., Reifart N., Werner G.S., Sianos G., Bonnier H., Sievert H., Ehladad S., Bufe A., Shofer J., Gershlick A., Hildick-Smith D., Escaned J., Erglis A., Sheiban I., Thuesen L., Serra A., Christiansen E., Buettner A., Costanzo L., Barrano G., Di Mario C. In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic total occlusion: insights from the ERCTO (European Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion) registry. EuroIntervention. 2011;7(4):472–479. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I4A77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kahn J.K., Hartzler G.O. Retrograde coronary angioplasty of isolated arterial segments through saphenous vein bypass grafts. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 1990;20(2):88–93. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810200205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rathore S., Katoh O., Matsuo H., Terashima M., Tanaka N., Kinoshita Y., Kimura M., Tsuchikane E., Nasu K., Ehara M., Asakura K., Asakura Y., Suzuki T. Retrograde percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusion of the coronary arteries: procedural outcomes and predictors of success in contemporary practice. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2009;2(2):124–132. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.838862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Surmely J.F., Katoh O., Tsuchikane E., Nasu K., Suzuki T. Coronary septal collaterals as an access for the retrograde approach in the percutaneous treatment of coronary chronic total occlusions. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2007;69(6):826–832. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Joyal D., Thompson C.A., Grantham J.A., et al. The retrograde technique technique for recanalization of chronic total occlusion: A step-by-step approach. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv. 2012;5:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wu E.B., Chan W.W., Yu C.M. Retrograde chronic total occlusion intervention: tips and tricks. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2008;72(6):806–814. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ge J. Current status of percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion. Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol) 2012;13:589–602. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1201009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Niccoli G., Ochiai M., Mazzari M.A. A complex case of right coronary artery chronic total occlusion treated by a successful multi-step Japanese approach. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2006;18(8):E230–E233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Surmely J.F., Tsuchikane E., Katoh O., Nishida Y., Nakayama M., Nakamura S., Oida A., Hattori E., Suzuki T. New concept for CTO recanalization using controlled antegrade and retrograde subintimal tracking: the CART technique. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2006;18(7):334–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tsuchikane E., Katoh O., Kimura M., Nasu K., Kinoshita Y., Suzuki T. The first clinical experience with a novel catheter for collateral channel tracking in retrograde approach for chronic coronary total occlusions. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2010;3(2):165–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nguyen T.N., Hu D., Chen S.L., editors. Practical Handbook of Advanced Interventional Cardiology. 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cohen R., Hattab M., Elhadad S. Retrograde approach “reverse CART technique” with a single guide for chronic total occlusion of the right coronary via an anomalous left circumflex artery. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2011;23:E92–E94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rathore S., Katoh O., Tsuchikane E., et al. Mini-Focus Issue: Chronic total occlusion a novel modification of the retrograde approach for the recanalization of chronic total occlusion of the coronary arteries intravascular ultrasound-guided reverse controlled antegrade and retrograde tracking. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv. 2010;3:155–164. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Funatsu A., Kobayashi T., Nakamura S. Use of kissing microcatheter technique to exchange a reytrograde wire. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2010;22:E74–E77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ge J.B., Zhang F., Ge L., Qian J.Y., Wang H. Wire trapping technique combined with retrograde approach for recanalization of chronic total occlusion. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.) 2008;121(17):1753–1756. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ge J., Zhang F. Retrograde recanalization of chronic total coronary artery occlusion using a novel “reverse wire trapping” technique. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2009;74(6):855–860. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kim M.H., Yu L.H., Mitsudo K. A new retrograde wiring technique for chronic total occlusion. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2010;75(1):117–119. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wu E.B., Chan W.W., Yu C.M. The confluent balloon technique--two cases illustrating a novel method to achieve rapid wire crossing of chronic total occlusion during retrograde approach percutaneous coronary intervention. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2009;21(10):539–542. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Grantham J.A. The steps of the retrograde technique: wire externalization, stenting and wire removal. Intervent Cardiol Clin. 2012;1:345–348. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2012.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hashidomi H., Saito S. Dilatation of septal collateral artery and subsequent cardiac tamponade during retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention using a microcatheter for chronic total occlusion. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2011;24:74–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2010.00604.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nombela-Franco L., Werner G.S. Retrograde recanalization of a chronic total occlusion of the left anterior descending artery. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2010;22:E7–E12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]