Abstract
Aim:
Lumpy skin disease (LSD) is an infectious viral disease of cattle caused by LSD virus (LSDV) of the family Poxviridae characterized by skin nodules covering all parts of the body. There are many aspects of LSD remaining unknown, thus immunological, hematological, and biochemical parameters were estimated.
Materials and Methods:
During an outbreak of LSD in Sharkia governorate from Egypt, 211 cows aging (2-4 years) were examined clinically for the presence of LSD lesions during the period from July to November 2014. A total of 134 cows from those showed lesions suspected to be LSD.
Results:
Recorded clinical signs were pyrexia with the development of skin nodules of varying sizes which ranged from a few to several hundred sometimes coalesced together. Enlargements of the peripheral lymph nodes. Intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies were noticed in the histopathological examination. Immunological studies revealed a significant decrease of lymphocyte transformation rate, phagocytic % and killing % which was marked within 2 weeks postinfection. LSD resulted in non-significant in hemogram in 1st-2nd day post-infection while a macrocytic hypochromic anemia within 10-14th days post-infection. Leucopenia and lymphopenia were recorded 1st-2nd day post-infection while at 10-14th showed granulocytic leucocytosis. Biochemical analysis revealed hypoproteinemia, hypoalbuminemia, and hyperglobulinemia especially gamma globulins. There were a significant increase in serum alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase activities, creatinine level, blood urea nitrogen and creatine phosphokinase
Conclusion:
LSDV infected cows in early stages revealed leucopenia. Immunosuppressive effect was pronounced later. In late stage revealed hemolytic anemia, leucocytosis and increase of serum CK, which could aid in diagnosis. Disturbance in liver and kidney function tests have been occurred.
Keywords: biochemistry, cows, hematology, histopathology, lumpy skin disease, virus
Introduction
Lumpy skin disease (LSD) is an infectious viral disease of cattle caused by LSD virus (LSDV) of the family Poxviridae virus known as (Neethling virus) characterized by fever and sudden eruption of multiple skin nodules covering all parts of the body [1]. LSD was first seen as an epidemic in Zambia in 1929, and since then has spread and affected cattle throughout Africa, including the countries of South Africa, Egypt, and Sudan [2]. Severe cyclic outbreaks continue to occur in Egypt during 1989, 2006 and 2011 were recorded in several Egyptian governorates, and then incursion of LSD was reported for the first time in Iraq and Turkey in 2013, indicating that the disease has a potential risk for further spread to the European Union and Caucasus Region, as well as to Asia [3-5]. The disease listed by OIE [6] in “List A” due to its rapid spread and severe economic losses, such as decrease in milk production and weight gain, mastitis, infertility, and death [7,8].
LSDV is primarily transmitted by biting insects. The virus have been isolated from mosquitoes of the genera Aedes and Culex and Ixodid ticks during some outbreaks [9] while direct contact between animals is not likely to be a significant source of spread of LSDV [4].
Despite of LSD could be diagnosed using serological and molecular techniques [10,11], histopathological examination remain an important tool to exclude viral, bacterial, or fungal causes development of skin nodular lesions in clinical cases and characteristic cytopathic effects (ballooning degeneration of squamous epithelial cells and eosinophilic intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies) in cases of LSD are well documented [12,13], but there are many aspects of LSD that remain unknown, so the immunological, hematological, and biochemical parameters of LSDV naturally infected cows were estimated in this study.
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval
Ethical approval from the Egyptian Veterinary Medicine Authority was obtained.
Animal
During an outbreak of LSD in Sharkia governorate in Egypt, 211 cows aging (2-4 years) were examined clinically for the presence of LSD lesions during the period from July to November 2014. A total of 134 cows from those showed lesions suspected to be LSD. The animals were feverish, had multiple skin nodules and enlargement of superficial lymph nodes typical of LSD. Treatment was including washing by water, and dressing by povidone iodine and diclofenac sodium with oxytetracycline 20% long acting, as antipyretic administration and broad spectrum antibiotics. Another 10 healthy cows were used like normal control.
Blood sampling
Blood was collected by puncture of the jugular vein from cows into three samples. The first blood samples were taken in heparinized tubes for immunological studies. The second blood samples were taken into ethylenediaminetetraacetic (EDTA) tubes for hematological analysis. The third blood samples were taken in a sterile test tube for separation of serum that was used for biochemical measurements. Samples were collected at (1st-2nd days) and (10-14th) days post appearance of skin nodules.
Immunological studies
A lymphocytic transformation assay using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-7l)-2, 5-diphenyl 2H tetrazolium bromide was used with 2348-71-2which is a methyl tetrazolium dye staining procedure [14]. Blood samples were collected in heparinized tubes and used to prepare leucocyte for bacterial phagocytic activity and killing power [15].
Hematological examination
Complete blood count was evaluated in an automatic cell counter (Hospitex Hemascreen 18, Italy).
Biochemical examination
Protein electrophoresis was quantitatively measured [16], while creatine phosphokinase (CK-MM) was measured in full automated biochemistry analyzer (Chemray 240. USSR). Serum activities of alanine and aspartate aminotransferase (ALT and AST) were determined [17], serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels were estimated [18,19].
Histopathological studies
Selected skin nodules from affected animals were surgically removed after local anesthesia then fixed in 10% buffered neutral formalin solution, dehydrated in gradual ethanol (70-100%), cleared in xylene, and embedded in paraffin. Five micron thickness paraffin sections were prepared and then routinely stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) dyes. The sections were mounted with Canada balsam and covered with the cover slide to be ready for histopathological examination [20].
Statistical analysis
Data obtained from this investigation were statistically analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance using SPSS 16.0 for windows [21]. Means in the same row followed by different letters were significantly different, and the highest value was represented with the letter (a).
Results and Discussion
LSD is a pox viral disease of cattle with a major socio-economic impact [22-24]. The LSD was confirmed by the presence of characteristic pathognomonic [12], eosinophilic intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies in the prickle cell layer (Figure-1) by histopathological examination of surgically removed skin nodules. Recorded clinical signs in this study were in agreement with the previous studies [12,13,25] who mentioned that LSD infected animals showed, pyrexia 40-41°C for large release and rapid clearance of pyrogens [25]. Skin nodules which ranged from a few to several hundred sometimes coalesced together. Later these nodules may be contained a clear serous or purulent exudates furthermore ulcers formation (Figures-2-4). Edema of the ventral abdominal wall and enlargement of superficial lymph nodes could be seen (Figures-5 and 6) [12]. Nasal discharge could be seen as a result of extent of infection to the upper respiratory tract (Figure-7) [7,12].
The innate immune response is the first line of defense of the immune system of the host and is needed for stimulating the adaptive immune response. The cellular components of the innate immune system, namely macrophages and neutrophils are critical for controlling microbial infection. These immune cells destroy the pathogen by phagocytosis and production of reactive oxygen species [26]. In the presented study, immunological parameters revealed a significant decrease of lymphocyte transformation rate, phagocytic activity and killing percentage which was marked within 2 weeks post-infection (Table-1) that may be due to LSD followed by secondary bacterial invasion in addition to stress induced immunosuppression [3].
Table-1.
Groups | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameters | Healthy control cows | LSD infected cows | ||||
Post-infection | F test | |||||
1st-2nd day | 10-14th days | |||||
LTR | 1.378a±0.01 | 1.255b±0.01 | 1.232b±0.008 | ** | ||
Phagocytic % | 83.00a±0.63 | 75.80b±0.72 | 73.60b±1.20 | ** | ||
Killing % | 80.60a±0.50 | 70.40b±0.50 | 68.40b±1.07 | ** |
Means in the same row with different superscript letters are significantly different
Highly significant difference at P≤0.01. LTR=Lymphocyte transformation rate, LSD=Lumpy skin disease, SE=Standard error
Regarding to the erythrogram results (Table-2) revealed non-significant change in hemogram within 1st-2nd day post-infection. At 10-14th day LSD post-infection revealed a significant decrease in red blood cells, hemoglobin, packed cell volume, and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration with a significant increase in mean corpuscular volume when compared by healthy control. This result interpreted as a macrocytic hypochromic anemia which in agreement with [27] who reported that hemolytic anemia could be occurred with viral infection. On the other side leucogram results (Table-3) during 1st-2nd days post-infection revealed leucopenia and lymphopenia which may be due to viral infection [28]. These results agree with [25] who recorded that a release of large quantities of endogenous corticosteroid could account for a lymphopenia. While 10-14th day post-infection revealed granulocytic leucocytosis which could be due to secondary acute bacterial infections, especially pyogenic bacterial infections [28,29].
Table-2.
Groups | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Parameters | Healthy control cows | LSD infected cows | ||
Post-infection | F test | |||
1st-2nd day | 10-14th days | |||
RBCs count (×106/μl) | 7.42a±0.11 | 7.19a±0.04 | 6.65b±0.08 | ** |
Hb (g %) | 10.9a±0.25 | 10.9a±0.07 | 9.2b±0.06 | ** |
PCV (%) | 34.20a±0.54 | 34.46a±0.22 | 30.44b±0.38 | ** |
MCV (fl) | 46.00b±0.00 | 46.00b±0.00 | 48.00a±0.00 | ** |
MCH (pg) | 14.96a±0.15 | 15.22a±0.16 | 13.76b±0.18 | ** |
MCHC (%) | 32.52a±0.25 | 31.68a±0.33 | 30.54b±0.27 | ** |
Means in the same row with different superscript letters are significantly different.
Highly significant difference at p≤0.01, *significant difference at P≤0.05. SE=Standard error, PCV=Packed cell volume, RBCs=Red blood cell, MCV=Mean corpuscular volume, MCH=Mean corpuscular hemoglobin, MCHC=Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, LSD=Lumpy skin disease
Table-3.
Groups | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Parameters | Healthy control cows | LSD infected cows | ||
Post-infection | F test | |||
1st-2nd day | 10-14th days | |||
WBC count (×103/μl) | 9.62b±0.14 | 7.10c±0.14 | 15.82a±0.99 | ** |
LYM (×103/μl) | 5.60a±0.28 | 3.04b±0.24 | 7.42a±1.17 | ** |
MID (×103/μl) | 1.39b±0.03 | 0.74c±0.05 | 3.03a±0.12 | ** |
GRA (×103/μ) | 2.63b±0.03 | 3.32b±0.03 | 5.37a±0.03 | * |
Means in the same row with different superscript letters are significantly different.
Highly significant difference at p≤0.01
significant difference at p≤0.05. SE=Standard error, WBC=white blood cell, GRA=Neutrophil, eosinophil and basophil, MID=Monocytes and some eosinophil, MCV=Mean corpuscular volume, MCH=Mean corpuscular hemoglobin, MCHC=Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, LSD=Lumpy skin disease
Regarding to results of biochemical analysis (Table-4) revealed a significant decrease in total protein and albumin, however; there was a significant increased in globulin, especially gamma globulins in LSD infected cows. These results might be attributed to decreased protein synthesis and higher catabolic rate, as well as damaged liver parenchyma [30]. While increased globulin, especially gamma globulins were mainly an immune response following infection [31]. The significant increase of CK in LSD infected cows clearer in late stage could be due to muscle damage involvement [32] that confirmed with histopathological examination which showing sever coagulative necrosis in subcutaneous muscle (Figure-8). So, LSD has economically importance not only induce damaged hides [33], but also involvement of muscle. On the other side, there were highly significant increases in serum activities of ALT and AST in LSD infected cows when compared to healthy control. These results may be due to liver function disturbance [34]. The increase in AST may be also due to the heart muscle and the general tissue breakdown caused by the virus or secondary bacterial infection [35]. Moreover, there was a significant increase in serum creatinine level in LSD cows, this result indicate the direct effect on the kidney by LSDV [28] while a significant increase in blood urea nitrogen in diseased animals in comparison with apparently healthy groups. This could be due to protein breakdown increased in hyperthermia [32].
Table-4.
Groups | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Parameters | Healthy control | LSD infected cows | ||
Post-infection | F test | |||
1st-2nd day | 10-14th days | |||
Total protein (g/dl) | 6.95a±0.12 | 6.10b±0.10 | 6.04b±0.21 | * |
Albumin (g/dl) | 3.80a±0.12 | 2.40b±0.17 | 2.32b±0.10 | ** |
Globulin (g/dl) | 3.15b±0.18 | 3.70a±0.11 | 3.72a±0.12 | * |
α globulins (g/dl) | 1.11a±0.12 | 1.01ab±0.12 | 0.91b±0.12 | * |
β globulins (g/dl) | 0.74a±0.12 | 0.68a±0.12 | 0.73a±0.12 | NS |
γ globulins (g/dl) | 1.30b±0.12 | 2.01a±0.12 | 2.08a±0.12 | ** |
CKMM (U/L) | 240.2c±1.88 | 297.8b±2.10 | 311.4a±2.97 | ** |
ALT (U/L) | 17.26b±0.79 | 30.54a±0.88 | 30.88a±1.23 | ** |
AST (U/L) | 47.22b±1.35 | 62.58a±1.40 | 63.12a±2.41 | ** |
Creatinine (mg/dl) | 0.55b±0.03 | 1.50a±0.13 | 1.47a±0.04 | ** |
Urea (mg/dl) | 15.4b±0.97 | 21.2a±0.58 | 21.6a±0.87 | ** |
Means in the same row with different superscript letters are significantly different.
Highly significant difference at p≤0.01.
Significant difference at p≤0.05. NS=Not significant, AST=Aspartate aminotransferase, ALT=Alanine aminotransferase, CKMM=Creatine phosphokinase, LSD=Lumpy skin disease
Conclusion
LSDV infected cows in early stages revealed leucopenia and immunosuppressive effect, so immunostimulant therapy is required. In late stage revealed hemolytic anemia, leucocytosis and increase of serum CK which could aid in diagnosis. Disturbance in liver and kidney function tests have been occurred.
Authors’ Contributions
ANFN collected and examined samples, planned the study design, drafted and revised the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Prof. Dr. Abdel-Moneim A. Ali Professor and Head of Pathology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at Zagazig University for valuable help in examining and reading histopathological slides. This work was done on author’s expense without funding from any organization. Necessary facilities of Department of Clinical pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University were used.
Competing Interests
The author declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Tuppurainen E., Oura C. Lumpy skin disease: An emerging threat to Europe, the middle east and Asia. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2012;59:40–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2011.01242.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Maclachlan N., Dubovi E. Fenner's Veterinary Virology. New York: Academic Press; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Salib F., Osman A. Incidence of lumpy skin disease among Egyptian cattle in Giza Governorate, Egypt. Vet. World. 2011;4:162–167. [Google Scholar]
- 4.El-Neweshy M., El-Shemey T., Youssef S. Pathologic and immunohistochemical findings of natural lumpy skin disease in Egyptian cattle. Pak. Vet. J. 2013;33(1):60–64. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Abera Z., Degefu H., Gari G., Ayana Z. Review on epidemiology and economic importance of lumpy skin disease. Int. J. B. A. Vir. 2015;4(1):8–21. [Google Scholar]
- 6.OIE. Lumpy Skin Disease. Paris, France: World Organization for Animal Health; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Irons P., Tuppurainen E., Venter E. Excretion of lumpy skin disease virus in bull semen. Theriogenology. 2005;63:1290–1297. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Duguma B., Kechero Y., Janssens G. Survey of major diseases affecting dairy cattle in Jimma Town, Oromia, Ethiopia. Glob. Vet. 2012;8(1):62–66. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chihota C., Rennie L., Kitching R., Mellor P. Attempted mechanical transmission of lumpy skin disease virus by biting insects. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2003;17:294–300. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2003.00445.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hailu B., Alemayehu G., Seid N. Economic importance and control techniques of lumpy skin diseases. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2015;3(2):58–66. [Google Scholar]
- 11.El-Nahas E., El-Habbaa A., El-bagoury G., Radwan M. Isolation and identification of lumpy skin disease virus from naturally infected buffaloes at Kaluobia, Egypt. Glob. Vet. 2011;7(3):234–237. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ali A., Esmat M., Attia H., Selim A., Abdel-Hamid Y. Clinical and pathological studies on lumpy skin disease in Egypt. Vet. Rec. 1990;127:549–550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brenner J., Haimovitz M., Oron E., Stram Y., Fridgut O., Bumbarov V., Kuznetzova L., Oved Z., Waserman A., Garazzi S., Perl S., Lahav D., Edery N., Yadin H. Lumpy Skin Disease (LSD) in a large dairy herd in Israel, June 2006. Isr. J. Vet. Med. 2006;61:73–77. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bounous D.I., Campagnoli R.P., Brown J. Comparison of MTT colorimetric assay and titrated thymidine uptake for lymphocyte proliferation assay using chicken splenocyte. Avian Dis. 1992;36:1022–1027. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Woldehiwet Z., Rowan T.G. Some observation on the effects of age on the phagocytosis and killing of S. aureus by polymorphnuclear leucocytes. Br. Vet. J. 1990;146:165–172. doi: 10.1016/0007-1935(90)90009-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Laurell C. Quantitative estimation of proteins by electrophoresis in agarose gel containing antibodies. Anal. Biochem. 1966;15(1):45–52. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(66)90246-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Reitman S., Frankel S. A colorimetric method for determination of serum glutamicoxaloacetic transaminase and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1957;25:56. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/28.1.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Husdan H., Rapoport K. Chemical determination of creatinine with deproteinization. Clin. Chem. 1968;14:222–238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Putton C., Crouch S. Determination of serum blood urea nitrogen. Anal. Chem. 1977;49:464–469. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bancroft J., Stevens A., Turner D. Theory and Practice of Histopathological Techniques. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tamhane A., Dunlop D. Statistic and Data Analysis from Elementary to Intermediate Prentice Hall. New Jersey. USA: Upper Saddle River; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Coetzer J., Tuppurainen E. Lumpy Skin Disease. Vol. 2. South Africa: Oxford University Press; 2004. pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tageldin M., Wallace D., Gerdes G., Putterill J., Greyling R., Phosiwa M., Al Busaidy R., Al Ismaaily S. Lumpy skin disease of cattle: An emerging problem in the Sultanate of Oman. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2014;46:241–246. doi: 10.1007/s11250-013-0483-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ahmed A., Dessouki A. Abattoir-based survey and histopathological findings of lumpy skin disease in cattle at Ismailia Abattoir. Int. J. Biosci. Biochem. Bioinformatics. 2013;3(4):372–375. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ismail S.M., Yousseff F.M. Clinical, hematological, biochemical and immunological studies on lumpy skin disease in Ismailia Governorate. SCVMJ. 2006;X(1):393–400. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang J., Huang Y. The immune system: A new look at pain. Chin. Med. J. 2006;119:930–938. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Douglas K., Wardrop K.J. Philadelphia and Baltimore: Black Well; 2010. Schalm's Veterinary Hematology. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Coles E. Philadelphia and London: W. B. Saunders Company; 1986. Veterinary Clinical Pathology. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kumar V., Cotran R., Robbins S. Robbins Basic Pathology: With Veterinary Consult Access. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hassan H.Y., El-Kirdasy A., Ali M.A. Immunobiochemical profile in cattle infected with lumpy skin disease. J. Basic Appl. Chem. 2011;1(2):21–25. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Agag B., Mousa S., Hassan H., Saber M., El-Deghidy N., Abdel-Aziz A. Clinical, serological and biochemical studies on lumpy skin disease. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 1992;1(1):13–23. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kaneko J.J., Harvey J.W., Bruss M.L. Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals. California USA: Academic Press; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Body M., Singh K., Hussain M., Al-Rawahi A., Al-Maawali M., Al-Lamki K., Al-Habsy S. Clinico-histopathological findings and PCR based diagnosis of lumpy skin disease in the Sultanate of Oman. Pak. Vet. J. 2012;32:206–210. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Abdalla M.A., Gawad S.M. Characterization of serum lysosomal enzymatic activities II effect of lumpy skin disease in Egypt. Dtsch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 1992;99(8):347–349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Agag B.L., Hafiz M.A., Ragab A., Tawfik A., Mousa H.L., Shaker M., El-Danal N. Changes in serum biochemical component of cattle suffering from LSD in Egypt. J. Comp. Pathol. Chin. Path. 1989;2(2):9–25. [Google Scholar]