Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Veterinary World logoLink to Veterinary World
. 2015 Mar 18;8(3):350–357. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.350-357

Impact of second line limiting amino acids’ deficiency in broilers fed low protein diets with rapeseed meal and de-oiled rice bran

C Basavanta Kumar 1,✉, R G Gloridoss 1, K Chandrapal Singh 2, T M Prabhu 1, Siddaramanna 3, B N Suresh 4, G A Manegar 5
PMCID: PMC4774842  PMID: 27047096

Abstract

Aim:

To study the impact of deficiency of second line limiting amino acids (SLAA; valine, isoleucine and tryptophan) on the production performance and carcass characteristics of commercial broilers.

Materials and Methods:

A control (T1) corn-soy diet was formulated to contain all essential AA on standardized ileal digestible basis; While in T2-a ‘moderate SLAA deficit’ diet was formulated by replacement of soybean meal with 6% rapeseed meal and T3-a ‘high SLAA deficit’ diet was formulated by replacement of soybean meal with 6% de-oiled rice bran. Each of these treatments was allotted to six replicates of ten chicks each. During the 42 days experimental period, growth performance, carcass parameters and intake of metabolizable energy (ME), crude protein (CP) and AA were studied.

Results:

The cumulative body weight gain, feed conversion ratio, carcass cut weights and yields of carcass, breast and thighs were decreased (p<0.05) in T3 compared to T1. The absolute intake of ME, lysine, methionine + cysteine and threonine were not affected while intake of CP and all SLAA were reduced in SLAA deficit diets. The relative intake of ME, lysine, methionine + cysteine, threonine and SLAA reduced in T3 in comparison to T1. The relative weights of internal organs were not affected by treatments while the abdominal fat percentage was increased linearly to the magnitude of SLAA deficiency.

Conclusion:

The deficiency of SLAA decreased performance, carcass yields and impaired utilization of ME, CP and AA linearly to the magnitude of the deficiency.

Keywords: isoleucine, tryptophan and broilers, valine

Introduction

Protein is un-debatably an important nutrient for poultry and should be an integral part of the diet. Protein rich ingredients accounts for 30-40% of the ration yet play an imperative role in determining the feed cost. It is universally accepted that, birds as such do not have a need for crude protein (CP) rather there is a need for amino acids (AA). In commercial poultry feed formulations, the first line of limiting AA are supplemented extensively as DL-methionine, L-lysine and L-threonine to rationalize the AA levels and to economize feed cost on corn soy diets. Lowering the dietary CP levels and use of synthetic AA perhaps reduce the cost of diet and the environmental pollution of nitrogen [1]. Hence, reduction of protein through inclusion of locally available feed ingredients such as rape seed meal (RSM) and de oiled rice bran (DORB) can be thought of as an alternative solution.

In previous studies, the RSM was used up to a level of 6-10% of the ration [2-4]. Very similarly, although the DORB was included up to 20% in broiler rations [5,6], yet other reports [7,8] indicate deleterious effects of DORB on broiler performance. However, it is noteworthy to state that, none of the studies conducted with inclusion of either RSM or DORB addressed the issue of protein reduction, and moreover, the soybean meal content was adjusted to make the diets iso-nitrogenous. Furthermore, the level of L-lysine maintained in such studies was far below the level recommended for present day commercial broilers, which allowed safe use of these resources, without causing deficiency of third and subsequent limiting AA. Formulation of diets based on standardized ileal digestible AA was suggested as a means for better utilization of alternative feed ingredients [9]. However, in RSM and DORB based low CP diets formulated to meet the recommended ideal standardized ileal digestible (SID) AA ratio profile [10], valine, isoleucine and occasionally tryptophan were found to be second line limiting AA notwithstanding the supplementation of L-lysine, DL-methionine and L-threonine.

Since, CP reduction was a theme of this study, RSM and DORB were incorporated to reduce CP by replacing soybean meal on W/W basis (6%), and the resultant impact and gravity of second line limiting AA (SLAA) (valine, isoleucine and tryptophan) deficiency on the broiler performance, carcass characteristics and intake of nutrients were assessed in this study.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

Prior approval of Institutional Animal Ethics Committee was obtained for use of chicks and experimental procedures adopted in this study.

Ingredients and AA analysis

Sufficient quantities of required feed ingredients were procured and analyzed for proximate principles [11]. Each ingredient was analyzed for AA composition at Evonik Laboratory. The feed formulation was done using the laboratory estimated CP and prorata AA composition of ingredients [12]. The AA profile of the experimental diets was arrived at based on the analyzed AA profile of each raw material.

Experimental design and diets

A control (T1) broiler diet formulated to meet recommended ideal SID AA ratio [10] in such a way to meet the requirement of fourth limiting AA (valine/isoleucine depending on the feeding phase) under pre-starter (0-14 days), starter (15-28 days) and finisher (29-42 days) phases (Table-1). In the test diet T2 (moderate SLAA deficiency), soybean meal was replaced on W/W basis with 6% RSM and the levels of lysine, methionine + cysteine and threonine were maintained as in T1 with supplemental feed grade AA. Similarly, in T3 (high SLAA deficiency) soybean meal was replaced on W/W basis with 6% DORB and here also the levels of lysine, methionine + cysteine and threonine were maintained on par with control through supplementation. Diets were formulated to contain the same energy, calcium, and available phosphorus while the CP was allowed to dilute. The acid-base imbalance in low protein diets was corrected on par to control. The nutrient and AA composition of experimental diets is presented in Table-2. The magnitude of SLAA deficiency created with replacement of soybean meal by RSM and DORB in test diets is presented in Table-3.

Table-1.

Ingredient composition of the experimental diets.

Ingredient (Kg/ton) Pre-starter diet Starter diet Finisher diet
T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3
Maize 484.5 475.5 473.0 537.0 527.5 524.5 597.0 587.5 585.0
Meat and bone meal - - - 40.0 40.0 40.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
Rapeseed meal - 60.0 - - 60.0 - - 60.0 -
DORB - - 60.0 - - 60.0 - - 60.0
Soybean meal 421 361 361 350.7 290.7 290.7 282.1 222.1 221.1
Dicalcium phosphate 20.0 20.0 20.0 7.5 7.5 7.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Calcite powder 12.5 12.2 12.9 5.3 5.0 5.7 4.1 4.0 4.7
Salt 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Soda bicarbonate 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Trace mineral premix1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Vegetable oil 46.9 53.7 53.4 44.3 51.3 51.0 47.2 54.2 53.9
L-lysine monohydrochloride 0.78 1.66 2.79 0.98 1.86 2.98 1.02 1.90 3.03
DL-methionine 3.27 3.12 4.03 3.19 3.05 3.95 2.79 2.64 3.55
L-threonine 0.36 0.62 1.30 0.49 0.75 1.43 0.46 0.72 1.41
Potassium carbonate 1.05 0.73 1.08 0.76 1.07 0.74
Additives2 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
Total 1000.8 1000.4 1000.6 1000.7 1000.4 1000.3 1000.5 1000.6 1000.1
Open in a new tab
1

Contained Fe-90000 ppm, I–2000 ppm, Cu–15000 ppm, Mn–90000 ppm, Zn-80000 ppm, Se–300 ppm,

2

Contained vitamin A-10 mIU, D3-2.0 mIU, E-30.0 g, C-50 g, B1-2.0 g, B2-10.0 g, B6-3.0 g, B12-0.015, Niacin-30.0 g, calcium-d-pantothenate 15.0 g, biotin-0.10 g, folic acid- 2.0 g and vitamin-K-4.0 g; herbal liver stimulant-1700 g; semduramicin-30.0 g; tetracyclin-30.00 g; a commercial toxin binder-2000 g, DORB=De oiled rice bran

Table-2.

Nutrient and amino acid composition of the experimental diets under different phases.

Ingredient (Kg/ton) Pre-starter diet Starter diet Finisher diet
T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3
CP (analyzed, %) 23.25 22.83 21.73 22.44 22.02 20.93 20.33 19.91 18.82
ME (Kcal/kg; calculated) 3000 3000 3000 3100 3100 3100 3200 3200 3200
Calcium % 1.01 1.01 1.01 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.89 0.90 0.89
Pav% 0.47 0.47 0.48 0.45 0.45 0.46 0.44 0.45 0.45
Amino acid composition (as SID calculated from analyzed value*) (%)
 Lysine 1.204 1.205 1.205 1.120 1.120 1.120 0.983 0.983 0.983
 Methionine+cystine 0.882 0.883 0.882 0.840 0.840 0.840 0.757 0.757 0.757
 Threonine 0.772 0.773 0.773 0.728 0.728 0.728 0.649 0.649 0.649
 Valine 0.953 0.924 0.838 0.896 0.851 0.779 0.803 0.763 0.688
 Isoleucine 0.885 0.843 0.775 0.806 0.751 0.696 0.708 0.666 0.598
 Tryptophan 0.240 0.233 0.209 0.211 0.205 0.180 0.180 0.173 0.149
Open in a new tab
*

SID coefficients were taken from (3), SID=Standardized ileal digestible, CP=Crude protein, ME=Metabolizable energy

Table-3.

The relative percentage of SID valine, isoleucine and tryptophan composition* as affected by inclusion of RSM and DORB.

Amino acid Pre starter Starter Finisher
T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3
Valine 100 97 88 100 95 87 101 98 87
Isoleucine 108 103 95 103 96 89 100 94 85
Tryptophan 125 121 108 118 114 100 108 104 89
Open in a new tab

T1: Control; T2: Moderate SLAA deficit diet; T3: High SLAA deficit diet,

*

as compared to the ideal SID AA ratio recommended by (3), AA=Amino acid, SLAA=Second line limiting amino acids, SID=Standardized ileal digestible, DORB=De oiled rice bran, RSM=Rape seed meal

Experimental birds

A total of 180 day-old straight run commercial broiler chicks were weighed, wing banded and divided into eighteen homogenous groups with ten chicks in each pen. The three experimental diets were randomly allocated to six pens each and each pen was considered as one experimental unit. All the chicks were reared in deep litter system in conventional open ventilated sheds with standard vaccination program and uniform managemental practices throughout the experiment.

Parameters studied

Growth performance parameters: Feed intake and body weight of the individual birds in each replicate were recorded at weekly intervals. The mortality of the bird was recorded as and when occurred. The mortality corrected feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated as unit feed intake to the unit body weight gain (BWG).

Dressing percentage and organometry: Two birds from each replicate were randomly selected at the end of the trial (42nd day), starved overnight with the provision for ad lib water and sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The dressing percentage was calculated as the percent of the carcass weight to the body weight after removing the feathers, neck, legs and internal viscera. Weight of different cuts viz., breast, thigh, drumstick and wing of the carcass was taken, and each part was expressed as a percent of pre-slaughter live weight (g/100 g). From each sacrificed bird, the weight of the giblet organs viz., heart (without pericardium), liver (without gall bladder) and gizzard (without inner layer) and additionally weight of abdominal fat was recorded and expressed as the per cent of pre-slaughter live weight (g/100 g).

Intake of ME, CP and AA: Based on the feed intake, intake of ME calculated based on the reported value while the CP and AA intakes were calculated based on the analyzed CP and AA composition.

Statistical analysis

The experimental data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA using means of six variants for each treatment. Tukey’s test with p<0.05 was used for mean separation wherever treatment effect was significant (p<0.05). Statistical analysis of data was performed using GraphPad Prism [13].

Results

Inclusion of 6% RSM at pre-starter phase resulted in marginal deficiency (Table-3) of valine alone (3%) while at starter and finisher phase, both valine (5% and 2%) and isoleucine (4% and 6%) were found to be deficit. The DORB inclusion at pre-starter and starter phase resulted in both valine (12% and 13%) and isoleucine (5% and 11%) deficiency while at finisher phase, in addition to deficiency of valine (13%) and isoleucine (15%), deficiency of tryptophan (11%) was also evident. The results imply that deficiency of valine was much larger than that of isoleucine and tryptophan in that order during pre-starter and starter phase while it was almost similar during finisher phase.

The BWG (Table-4) of birds was found to be significantly affected by treatments at all stages of life. During pre-starter phase, BWG in T3 was significantly (p<0.05) reduced by 14.21% compared to that of T1, while T2 remained non-significant from both T3 and T1. However, the trend in the starter phase was quite different with significant (p<0.05) reduction of BWG in both T2 and T3 by 10.43 and 10.77% respectively from T1. However, in the finisher phase, only high SLAA deficiency resulted in significant (p<0.05) BWG reduction, but not the moderate deficiency group. On overall cumulative basis, the BWG in T2 (4.98%) and T3 (7.48%) were significantly (p<0.05) inferior to that of control and the response was found to be significantly (p<0.001) linear to the magnitude of SLAA deficiency. The feed intake (FI) in T3 during pre-starter phase was significantly (p<0.05) reduced (4.48%) in comparison to that of control and the FI in T2 was statistically similar (p≥0.05) to those of T1 and T3 groups whereas, in contrast, during starter phase, T2 was significantly (p<0.05) inferior to T1 and was non-significant with the T3 which stood in middle. However in contrary, during the finisher phase and on the cumulative basis there was a non-significant effect of treatments on the FI. The FCR (Table-4) was significantly (p<0.001) altered due to SLAA deficiency throughout the phases and cumulatively as well. FCR was significantly (p<0.05) different in each treatment during pre-starter and finisher phases. On the other hand, at starter phase, FCR in T2 and T3 was significantly (p<0.05) deprived than control despite of being non-significant from each other. On cumulative basis in T2 and T3, a significantly (p<0.05) poor FCR of magnitude 0.039 and 0.061 units was evident in contrast to control with a clear-cut linear effect of SLAA deficiency (p<0.001). The mortality rate was numerically high in T3 (5.00%) and T2 (3.33%) in comparison to T1 (2.00%) although it was statistically non-significant.

Table-4.

Effect of second line limiting amino acid deficit diets on the BWG, feed intake and feed conversion ratio at different phases.

Treatment Average BWG (g) Average FI (g) Average FCR (g per g gain)
Pre-starter Starter Finisher Cumulative Pre-starter Starter Finisher Cumulative Pre-starter Starter Finisher Cumulative
T1 292.8a 763.5a 1071a 2127a 345.8a 1067a 2062 3475 1.181a 1.434a 1.967a 1.663a
T2 274.2ab 683.9b 1062a 2021b 330.3ab 991b 2106 3427 1.205b 1.465b 1.988b 1.702b
T3 251.2b 681.3b 1036b 1968c 310.9b 1006ab 2092 3408 1.220c 1.478b 2.018c 1.724c
SEM 5.30 10.37 4.72 16.56 5.42 11.66 18.66 17.00 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.006
P 0.002 <0.001 0.002 <0.001 0.029 0.016 0.683 0.308 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Linear P 0.001 <0.001 0.001 <0.001 0.009 0.021 0.566 0.139 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Open in a new tab

T1: Control; T2: Moderate SLAA deficit diet; T3: High SLAA deficit diet,

a-c

with in a column means bearing different superscripts significantly (p<0.05) differ, SLAA=Second line limiting amino acids, FCR=Feed conversion ratio, FI=Feed intake, BWG=Body weight gain, SEM=Standard error of the mean, SLAA=Second line limiting amino acids

The fresh carcass weight (Table-5) was significantly (p<0.05) inferior to T1 in both treatments with SLAA deficiency. The weight of the breast, thigh, drumstick and wing were significantly (p<0.05) different in T3 vis-a-vis T1 and the corresponding weights in T2 were non-significant from both T1 and T3. The carcass yield, breast yield and thigh yield as percent of live weight were significantly (p<0.05) decreased due to SLAA deficiency and in contrary the drumstick and wing yield remained non-significant. The impact of SLAA deficiency was not evident on the relative weights of internal organs viz., liver, gizzard and heart (Figure-1), though the relative weight of abdominal fat was significantly (p<0.05) elevated with SLAA deficiency.

Table-5.

Effect of second line limiting amino acid deficit diets on carcass characteristics of broilers at the end of 42 days.

Treatment Carcass cuts (weight in g) Carcass yield (percent of live weight)
Fresh Carcass Breast Weight Thigh Weight Drumstick Wing Fresh Carcass Breast Yield Thigh Yield Drumstick Yield Wing Yield
T1 1593a 482.0a 293.9a 222.0a 180.5a 74.66a 22.58a 13.76a 10.39 8.45
T2 1479b 445.3ab 265.9ab 204.8ab 165.7ab 73.10b 22.00ab 13.13ab 10.11 8.18
T3 1443b 424.6b 247.8b 192.6b 154.0b 72.31b 21.26b 12.40b 9.63 7.70
SEM 18.58 7.32 5.40 4.43 4.10 0.239 0.194 0.172 0.153 0.152
P 0.003 0.006 0.002 0.030 0.037 <0.001 0.023 0.005 0.143 0.150
Linear P 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.009 0.011 <0.001 0.007 0.001 0.055 0.059
Open in a new tab

T1: Control; T2: Moderate SLAA deficit diet; T3: High SLAA deficit diet,

a-c

Within a column means bearing different superscripts significantly (p<0.05) differ, SEM=Standard error mean, SLAA=Second line limiting amino acids

Figure-1.

Figure-1

Open in a new tab

Effect of second line limiting amino acid deficit diets on relative weights of liver, gizzard, heart and abdominal fat of broilers, T1- Control; T2- Moderate SLAA deficit diet; T3- High SLAA deficit diet; *Methionine + Cysteine, a-cWithin a column means bearing different superscripts significantly (p<0.05) differ

The impact of SLAA deficiency on the intake of ME, lysine, sulfur AA (methionine + cystine) and threonine (Table-6) per bird was not evident, while the corresponding measure for CP and SLAA was decreased in a linear (p<0.001) fashion as the level of SLAA deficiency magnified. The absolute intake of valine, isoleucine and tryptophan was significantly (p<0.05) decreased in T2 and T3 in comparison to T1 and further, difference between both T2 and T3 was quite significantly (p<0.05) noticeable. The decreasing trend in the intake of SLAA was significantly (p<0.001) linear to the extent of the insufficiency. When the intake of these nutrients were expressed to unit weight gain, it was interesting to note that, the ME intake increased linearly to the enormity of SLAA insufficiency. On the other hand, the CP intake per Kg of BWG was incoherent with SLAA deficiency. The intake of lysine, methionine + cystine and threonine per unit of BWG was found to be significantly (p<0.003) amplified to the magnitude of SLAA deficiency. Intake of lysine, methionine + cysteine and threonine per kg BWG in T3 was significantly (p<0.05) elevated compared to T1, although the difference was non-significant from T2. The valine (g/kg BWG) intake in T2 was non-significant with control whereas in T3 it was significantly lower than T1. Considering intake of valine and isoleucine, it was interesting to note that, intake per kg BWG was statistically non-significant in T2 vis-a-vis T1 and the difference was significant only in T3 with high degree of SLAA deficiency. The trend of decreasing SLAA intake to the magnitude of SLAA deficiency was highly significantly (p<0.001) linear.

Table-6.

Impact of second line limiting amino acid deficiency on cumulative absolute and relative intake of ME, CP and Amino Acids.

ME (M cal) CP (g) Lysine (g) M+C* (g) Threonine (g) Valine (g) Isoleucine (g) Tryptophan (g)
Intake per bird
 T1 10.95 740a 36.32 27.68 23.82 29.42a 26.25a 6.79a
 T2 10.80 713b 35.74 27.24 23.47 27.55b 24.25b 6.43b
 T3 10.74 672c 35.53 27.08 23.33 24.82c 21.92c 5.58c
 SEM 0.054 7.447 0.175 0.134 0.114 0.476 0.439 0.127
 P 0.349 <0.001 0.203 0.219 0.237 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Linear P 0.162 <0.001 0.086 0.094 0.102 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Intake per kg live weight gain
 T1 5.15a 348 17.08a 13.01a 11.20a 13.83a 12.34a 3.19a
 T2 5.35ab 353 17.69ab 13.48ab 11.61ab 13.64a 12.00a 3.18a
 T3 5.46b 341 18.06b 13.77b 11.86b 12.61b 11.14b 2.83b
 SEM 0.04 2.24 0.14 0.11 0.090 0.157 0.140 0.044
 P 0.009 0.103 0.008 0.008 0.007 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Linear P 0.003 0.233 0.002 0.003 0.002 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Open in a new tab

T1 Control; T2 Moderate SLAA deficit diet; T3: High SLAA deficit diet;

*

Methionine+Cysteine,

a-c

Within a column means bearing different superscripts significantly (p<0.05), differ, SLAA=Second line limiting amino acids

Discussion

The BWG of birds was significantly reduced by SLAA deficiency at all stages of life, which is a clear reflection of impact of treatments on the input of critical nutrients channeled through feed intake and it was found that the bids eat to satisfy the need for a limiting nutrient, and in this attempt the birds might have failed as a result of bulkiness of the feed or the inability of birds to lose sufficient heat to remain in thermal balance, which follows the principles of the Theory of food intake and growth proposed by Emmans [14,15]. The deficiency of SLAA resulted in significantly lower absolute intake of valine and isoleucine (in T2) and additionally tryptophan (in T3; Table-6) which perhaps impeded protein accretion and hence the growth performance of broilers, since AA have been revealed to influence the myogenic gene expression in broilers [16]. The growth retardation as a consequence to SLAA deficiency is well noticed in previous studies with deficiencies of valine alone in young broilers [17,18], valine and isoleucine [1,19], isoleucine, tryptophan and arginine [20], isoleucine alone [21,22] and arginine, valine, isoleucine and tryptophan [23]. With marginal SLAA deficiency in the finisher phase, birds could compensate to the SLAA intake at this time period (data not shown) and as a consequence, birds could grow on par with control which is suggestive of the compensatory growth during this period due to moderate but not for high SLAA deficiency. The feed intake which was reduced due to SLAA deficiency in the initial pre-starter and starter phases was found to be compensated in the finisher phase suggestive of the adoptive nature of birds to consume more feed owing to relatively well developed intestinal segments at this stage. The non-alteration of cumulative feed intake is largely due to an elevated fatness indicated in SLAA deficit treatments during finisher phase, for obvious reasons discussed above. The reduction of feed intake consequent to the high SLAA deficiency is supported by the studies of [17] with valine, [24] with isoleucine, glycine, glutamic acid and that of [22] with isoleucine deficiencies. In addition, non-alteration of feed intake due to marginal deficiency of valine was reported in finisher broilers [25] is indicative of the adoptive behavior of birds to marginal deficiency of SLAA. The poor FCR of magnitude 0.039 (T2) and 0.061 (T3) units observed in this study is supportive to the earlier findings with valine (17; 25), with isoleucine, glycine and glutamic acid [24], with isoleucine, tryptophan and arginine [20] and with valine and isoleucine [26,27] deficiencies.

The linear decrease in fresh carcass weight to the magnitude of SLAA deficiency perhaps reflects the response observed for BWG for the reasons discussed previously. The reduction in absolute weight of breast, thigh, drumstick and wing was evident only due to high SLAA deficiency, which is obvious since the requirement of valine is less (76-77% of lysine) for optimum yield of these parameters as compared to the requirement for optimum growth (78% of lysine) as reported by [28]. The carcass, breast and thigh yields were decreased due to high SLAA deficiency and in contrary the drumstick and wing yield remained non-significant which sounds due to relatively less requirement of valine (72-74% of lysine; 28) and probably isoleucine and tryptophan as compared to the requirement for optimum growth. The deficiencies of isoleucine, glycine and glutamic acid [24] and of isoleucine, tryptophan and arginine [20] revealed to significantly alter carcass parameters. In one study [19] the breast meat yield was shown to be more responsive to isoleucine than to valine, which substantiates lesser valine need for breast meat yield. The relative weight of abdominal fat was increased linearly to SLAA deficiency which can be related to the ME intake per kg BWG, which also increased linearly as the SLAA deficiency increased resulting in storage of excess energy in the form of abdominal fat.

The comprehensive intake of ME, lysine, methionine + cysteine and threonine which was similar across the treatments is suggestive of the theory that birds eat to meet the nutrient demands, especially energy because the proportion of lysine, methionine + cysteine and threonine to ME was constant in all the treatments. On the other hand, intake of CP and SLAA were significantly reduced linearly to SLAA deficiency which is obvious as CP and SLAA were reduced in both the treatments. According to the theory of food intake and growth proposed by Emmans [14,15], birds attempt to grow at their genetic potential, which would mean that they attempt to eat sufficient quantity of given feed (hence nutrient) required to grow at that rate. It is clear that, FI or nutrient intake is a function of BWG and hence the individual nutrient intakes were transformed per kg BWG. It was found that ME, lysine, methionine + cysteine and threonine intakes were increased linearly to the magnitude of SLAA deficiency. As the protein or AA content of a diet was reduced, pigs [29-31] and broilers [32,33] found to increase FI to meet their requirement for specific nutrient for potential growth, and the extent to which the nutrient deficiency can be compensated depends on the amount of heat that animal can lose to the environment. This perhaps pertinent to countries like in India where ambient temperature is anticipated to be more than optimal thermo neutral temperature. With this in view, it can be regarded that, excess intake of ME has refrained birds from consuming more feed and hence birds could not eat enough to compensate for the SLAA deficiency particularly in high SLAA deficit diet resulting significant growth retardation.

The RSM although was included 6-10% of ration in previous studies [2-4], yet in all these studies, the CP was made homogenous by adjusting the soybean meal content of the diets. Moreover, in these studies [34,35], for instance at pre-starter phase the total L-lysine level of the ration was maintained at 1.17-1.20% and the threonine (>0.85%) and valine (>1.0%) levels remained excess of requirement for the given lysine levels, thus question of deficiency of third and subsequent limiting AA does not arise, which explains the reason for favorable results with inclusion of 6-10% RSM in previous studies by balancing only for lysine and methionine. In the present study, the lysine level was maintained at 1.33% as recommended for present Cobb broilers, which subsequently increased the requirement of fourth and subsequent limiting AA resulting in a marginal deficiency in RSM based diets and high deficiency in DORB based diets. However, in previous studies, the overall FCR ranged from 1.94 to 2.13 [3] and 2.03-2.30 [4], which was obvious due to low AA density of diets and was incomparable to FCR of the present study as well as FCR of present commercial broiler industry.

The significant depression of bird performance observed in present study with DORB inclusion was in agreement with the previous findings [7,8]. Since, the DORB inclusion is known to reduce the essential AA content of the diet, [34] tried using limiting AA balancing for utilization of used rice bran (with oil) up to 20% of ration. However, the soybean meal content was increased to balance the limiting AA and hence, the CP was increased by 2.00% point in diet balanced for all limiting AA compared to control. In this context, the poor performance observed under 6% RSM and DORB included diets can be clearly attributed to the deficiency of SLAA.

Conclusion

The study concluded that deficiency of SLAA on RSM and DORB based diets would severely impact the bird performance, carcass parameters and abdominal fat percent depending on the extent of SLAA deficiency. Further studies needed with supplementation of L-valine, L-isoleucine and L-tryptophan to reduce protein in broiler diets by incorporation of RSM and DORB.

Authors’ Contributions

CBK conceptualized the idea, carried out the experiment, analyzed the data and drafted first manuscript. RGG, KCS, TMP, S and BNS designed and guided during the experiment, helped in analysis of data, given critical inputs and revised the manuscript. GAM helped in carrying out experiment, involved in data collection, laboratory analysis. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors duly acknowledge the support given by Veterinary College, Bangalore, India and KVAFSU for providing financial assistance for the work, which was a part of Ph.D. Research work of the first author. We also thank Dr. B.S.V. Reddy for precious technical guidance regarding commercial poultry practices. We also acknowledge the support given by Evonik Pte. Ltd. Singapore and particularly Dr. D. Kiran (Evonik Pte. Ltd. Singapore) for help in analysis of amino acid composition of the feed ingredients.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Carzo A, Loar R.E, II, Kidd M.T. Limitations of dietary isoleucine and valine in broiler chick diets. Poult. Sci. 2009;88(9):1934–1938. doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kinal S, Fritz Z, Jarosz L, Schleicher A. Rape seeds, partly defatted seeds and rapeseed oil meal from var. Jantar in the feeding of broilers. Rocz. Naukowe. Zootech. Monogr. Rozpr. 1990;28:251–260. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tangtaweewipat S, Cheva-Isarakul B, Sangsrijun P. The use of mustard meal as a protein source in broiler diets. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 2004;26(1):23–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Thanaseelaan V, Viswanathan K, Venukopalan K, Prabakaran R, Chellapandian M. Effect of feeding rapeseed meal in meat type chicken. Tamil Nadu J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2008;4(4):157–161. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Purushothaman M.R, Agarwal D.K, Sadagopan V.R. Feeding value of deoiled rice bran for broilers. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 1990;7(1):59–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Khan M.Y, Pasha T.N, Khalique A, Ali Z, Rehman H. Effect of feeding hydrogen peroxide treated defatted rice polishing on performance of broiler chicks. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2002;1(6):193–196. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bhoyar P.M, Kaduskar M.R, Thatte V.R, Khire D.W, Gawali A.P. Performance of broilers on non-cereal ration replaced for conventional ration. Indian J. Poult. Sci. 1992;27(4):234–237. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Das A, Ghosh S.K. Effect of feeding different levels of rice bran on performance of broilers. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 2000;17(4):333–335. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Szczurek W. Practical validation of efficacy of the standardized ileal digestible amino acid values in diet formulation for broiler chickens. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2010;19:590–598. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hoehler D, Lemme A, Ravindran V, Bryden W.L, Rostagno H.S. Feed formulation in broiler chickens based on standardized ileal amino acid digestibility. In: Cruz-Suarez L.E, Ricque-Marie D, Tapia-Salazar M, Nieto-Lopez M.G, Villarreal-Cavazos D.A, Puello-Cruz A.C, Garcia-Ortega A, editors. Advances in Poultry Nutrition VIII. Symposium Internacional de Nutrición Acuícola. Monterrey, Nuevo León (Mexico): UANL; 2006. pp. 197–212. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists International; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.India Raw Material Report Crop Year 2012. Singapore: Evonik SEA Pte. Ltd. (6036); 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.GraphPad Prism version 5.01 for Windows, GraphPad Software. San Diego California USA: [20/09/2013]. Available from: http://www.graphpad.com . [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Emmans G.C. A model of the growth and feed intake of adlibitum fed animals, particularly poultry. In: Hilllyer G.M, Wittemore C.T, Gunn R.G, editors. Computers in Animal Production. UK: British Society of Animal Production; 1981. pp. 103–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Emmans G.C. The growth of turkeys. In: Nixey C, Grey T.C, editors. Recent Advances in Turkey Science. UK: Butterworths; 1989. pp. 135–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wen C, Chen X, Chen G.Y, Wu P, Chen Y.P, Zhou Y.M, Wang T. Methionine improves breast muscle growth and alters myogenic gene expression in broilers. J. Anim. Sci. 2014;92(3):1068–1073. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Carzo A, Dozier W.A, III, Kidd M.T. Valine Nutrient recommendations for ross x ross 308 broilers. Poult. Sci. 2008;87(2):335–338. doi: 10.3382/ps.2007-00307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Berres J, Vieira S.L, Favero A, Freitas D.M, Pena J.E.M, Nogueira E.T. Digestible valine requirements in high protein diets for broilers from twenty-one to forty-two days of age. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011;165:120–124. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Carzo A, Dozier W.A, III, Loar R.E, II, Kidd M.T, Tillman P.B. Dietary limitation of isoleucine and valine in diets based on maize, soybean meal, and meat and bone meal for broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 2010;51(4):558–563. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2010.507242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Carzo A, Dozier W.A, III, Mejia L, Zumwalt C.D, Kidd M.T, Tillman P.B. Nutritional feasibility of L-valine inclusion in commercial broiler diets. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2011;20:284–290. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mejia L, Zumwalt C.D, Kim E.J, Tillman P.B, Corzo A. Digestible isoleucine-to-lysine ratio effects in diets for broilers from 4 to 6 weeks post hatch. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2011;20:485–490. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tavernari F.C, Lelis G.R, Carneiro P.R.O, Vieira R.A, Polveiro R.C, Luengas J.A.P, Rostagno H.S, Albino L.F.T. Effect of different digestible isoleucine/lysine ratios for broiler chickens. Rev. Bras. Zootech. 2012;41(7):1699–1705. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Campos A.M.A, Rostagno H.S, Nogueira E.T, Albino L.F.T, Pereira J.P.L, Maia R.C. Updating of the ideal protein for broilers: Arginine, isoleucine, valine and tryptophan. Rev. Bras. Zootech. 2012;41(2):326–332. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Berres J, Vieira S.L, Dozier W.A, III, Cortes M.E.M, De Barros R, Nogueira E.T, Kutschenko M. Broiler responses to reduced protein diets supplemented with valine, isoleucine, glycine and glutamic acid. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2010;19:68–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tavernari F.C, Lelis G.R, Vieira R.A, Rostagno H.S, Albino L.F.T, Oliveira Neto A.R. Valine needs in starting and growing Cobb (500) broilers. Poult. Sci. 2013;92:151–157. doi: 10.3382/ps.2012-02278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Berres J, Vieira S.L, Kidd M.T, Taschetto D, Freitas D.M, Barros R, Nogueira E. T. Supplementing l-valine and l-isoleucine in low-protein corn and soybean meal all-vegetable diets for broilers. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2010;19:373–379. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dozier W.A, III, Tillman P.B, Usry J. Interactive effects of digestible valine-and isoleucine-to-lysine ratios provided to male broilers from 4 to 6 weeks of age. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2012;21:838–848. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Carzo A, Kidd M.T, Dozier W.A, III, Vieira S.L. Marginality and needs of dietary valine for broilers fed all vegetable diets. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2007;16:546–554. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ferguson N.S, Arnold G.A, Lavers G. The response of growing pigs to amino acids as influenced by environmental temperature. 1. Threonine. Anim. Sci. 2000;70:287–297. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ferguson N.S, Arnold G.A, Lavers G. The response of growing pigs to amino acids as influenced by environmental temperature. 2. Lysine. Anim. Sci. 2000;70:299–306. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ferguson N.S, Gous R.M. The response of growing pigs to amino acids as influenced by environmental temperature: Tryptophan. Anim. Sci. 2002;74:103–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kemp C, Fisher C, Kenny M. Genotype-nutrition interactions in broilers;response to balanced protein in two commercial strains, 15th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition. Balatonfüred, Hungary: 2005. pp. 54–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Berhe E.T, Gous R.M. Effect of dietary protein content on allometric relationships between carcass portions and body protein in Cobb and Ross broilers. Pretoria. Jaboticabal: 24th Conference of South African Branch of WPSA, UNESP; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Piyaratne M.K.D.K, Atapattu N.S.B.M, Mendis A.P.S, Amarasinghe A.G.C. Effects of balancing rice bran based diets foe up to four amino acids on growth performance of broilers. Trop. Agric. Res. Ext. 2009;12(2):57–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Thacker P.A, Petri D. The effects of canola or mustard biodiesel press cake on nutrient digestibility and performance of broiler chickens. Asian Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2009;22(11):1531–1539. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Veterinary World are provided here courtesy of Veterinary World

RESOURCES