Abstract
The slow growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), hinders development of new diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines. Using non-invasive real-time imaging technologies to monitor the disease process in live animals would facilitate TB research in all areas. We developed fluorescent protein (FP) expressing Mycobacterium bovis BCG strains for in vivo imaging, which can be used to track bacterial location, and to quantify bacterial load in live animals. We selected an optimal FP for in vivo imaging, by first cloning six FPs: tdTomato, mCherry, mPlum, mKate, Katushka and mKeima, into mycobacteria under either a mycobacterial Hsp60 or L5 promoter, and compared their fluorescent signals in vitro and in vivo. Fluorescence from each FP-expressing strain was measured with a multimode reader using the optimal excitation and emission wavelengths for the FP. After normalizing bacterial numbers with optical density, the strain expressing L5-tdTomato displayed the highest fluorescence. We used the tdTomato-labeled M. bovis BCG to obtain real-time images of pulmonary infections in living mice and rapidly determined the number of bacteria present. Further comparison between L5-tdTomato and Hsp60-tdTomato revealed that L5-tdTomato carried four-fold more tdTomato gene copies than Hsp60-tdTomato, which eventually led to higher protein expression of tdTomato. Evaluating anti-TB efficacy of rifampicin and isoniazid therapy in vitro and in vivo using the L5-tdTomato strain demonstrated that this strain can be used to identify anti-TB therapeutic efficacy as quickly as 24 h post-treatment. These M. bovis BCG reporter strains represent a valuable new tool for evaluation of therapeutics, vaccines and virulence.
Introduction
Tuberculosis (TB) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide [1]. The challenges faced in TB control are: lack of an effective vaccine, emergence of multidrug-resistant TB globally, and increasing cases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and HIV co-infection in many regions of the world [2, 3]. A more effective vaccine and new antimicrobial agents are urgently needed. The causative agent of TB, M. tuberculosis, grows very slowly in culture. It takes weeks to obtain visible colonies on agar plates to determine colony forming units (CFU) after inoculation. Using non-invasive real-time optical imaging technologies to monitor the bacterial burden and disease progress in small animals would greatly accelerate research in TB. When in vivo optical imaging is used to estimate bacterial number, the bacteria within the site of infection can be quantified immediately based on the level of fluorescent or bioluminescent signal they produce, rather than waiting for CFU, a tedious procedure that requires weeks to obtain data.
Optical imaging systems have been successfully used in real-time monitoring of tumorigenesis and a growing number of infectious diseases [4–11]. Both bioluminescent imaging and fluorescent imaging probes have been developed for TB research [10–19], a number of which have been applied to in vivo imaging of M. tuberculosis [11, 12, 14, 18, 19]. Fluorescent proteins (FPs) have been used widely in cell and animal imaging to track cellular movement in embryogenesis and inflammatory processes [20, 21], to monitor pathogen migration in host [22–24], and to study carcinogenesis processes in live animals [4, 25–28]. Imaging fluorescent signals in deep tissues of animals requires that the FP has excitation and emission wavelengths within or at least close to the near-infrared (NIR) window, which is 600–900 nm, because hemoglobin and water have their lowest absorption coefficients in the NIR window [29]. Several FPs have excitation and emission wavelengths close to this NIR window, with red or far-red colors ranging from 581 nm to 655 nm [30].
After carefully comparing excitation and emission wavelengths, brightness, and photostability, we selected mPlum [31], mKate, Katushka [28], Keima [32], mCherry, and tdTomato [33] to clone into mycobacterial strains, and evaluate their sensitivity for detecting mycobacteria in vitro and in vivo, using a multi-mode spectrometer and whole animal imaging system, IVIS (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). The FP expressing strain having the highest sensitivity of detection was successfully applied to evaluation of the efficacy of anti-TB therapy in bacterial culture and in live animals.
Materials and Methods
Plasmid Construction
The plasmids carrying tdTomato, mCherry and mPlum genes (pRSETB-tdTomato, pRSETB-mCherry, and pBAD-mPlum) were acquired from Dr. Rodger Y. Tsien’s laboratory. pmKeima-Red-S1 was from Amalgaam Co.; pTagFP635-C mKate and pTurboFP635-C Katushka were purchased from Evrogen Co. To construct plasmids expressing tdTomato or mCherry under Hsp60 promoter, pRSETB-tdTomato or pRSETB-mCherry DNA was cut with NheI and ScaI. After gel purification to separate the DNA sequences containing tdTomato or mCherry, the DNA fragments were ligated into the NheI / ScaI cut linear fragment of the Escherichia coli-mycobacterium shuttle plasmid pJDC89 [34] that carries the Hsp60 promoter to generate pJDC122 (Hsp60-tdTomato) or pJDC124 (Hsp60-mCherry). To construct plasmids expressing mPlum, Keima, mKate or mKatushika under Hsp60 promoter, these four FP genes were amplified with PCR using an up-stream primer containing NheI site at 5’ end and a down-stream primer containing PacI site at 5’ end. The PCR products were then cut with NheI / PacI, and ligated with the NheI / PacI digested linear fragment of the pJDC89 to generate pJDC128 (Hsp60-mPlum), pJDC140 (Hsp60-Keima), pJDC130 (Hsp60-mKate), and pJDC131 (Hsp60-Katushka). The plasmids constructed and primers used for PCR are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Plasmids and primers.
FP | Plasmids | Primers |
---|---|---|
tdTomato | pJDC122 | F: 5’- TATAAAGCTTGGATCCATGGTGAGCAAGG-3’ |
pJDC60 | R: 5’-TATAGGTACCGAATTCTTACTTGTACAGCTCGTCC-3’ | |
mCherry | pJDC124 | F: 5’- TATAAAGCTTGGATCCATGGTGAGCAAGG-3’ |
pJDC171 | R: 5’-TATAGGTACCGAATTCTTACTTGTACAGCTCGTCC-3’ | |
mPlum | pJDC128 | F: 5’- TATAGCTAGCGCCACCATGGTGAGCAA-3’ |
R: 5’-TATATTAATTAATAGGCGCCGGTGGAGT-3’ | ||
mKate | pJDC130 | F: 5’-TATAGCTAGCATGGTGTCTAAGGGCGAAGA-3’ |
R: 5’-TATATTAATTAAATTAAGTTTGTGCCCCAGTTTG-3’ | ||
Katushka | pJDC121 | F: 5’-TATAGCTAGCCCATGGTGGGTGAGGATAG-3’ |
R: 5’-TATATTAATTAAGCTGTGCCCCAGTTTGCTAG-3’ | ||
Keima | pJDC140 | F: 5’-TATAGCTAGCCATGGTGAGTGTGATCGCTAA-3’ |
R: 5’-TATATTAATTAAGTTAACCGAGCAAAGAGTGGC-3’ |
To construct the plasmids expressing tdTomato or mCherry under the mycobacterial phage L5 promoter, we first PCR amplified the two genes from pRSETB-tdTomato or pRSETB-mCherry using an up-stream primer containing HindIII site at 5’ end and a down-stream primer containing KpnI site at 5’ end (Table 1). The primer pair was the same for both genes, because tdTomato is a tandem dimer of mCherry. We then cut pFJS8, an E. coli-mycobacterium shuttle plasmid containing the L5 promoter [35], with HindIII / KpnI, and separated the larger fragment by gel purification. The HindIII / KpnI digested PCR products were also gel purified to get tdTomato and mCherry specific fragments, and then ligated into this HindIII / KpnI cut pFJS8 linear fragment, to form pJDC60 (L5-tdTomato) or pJDC171 (L5-mCherry).
Strains and Growth Conditions
Plasmids were transformed into M. smegmatis and M. bovis BCG. Bacteria were grown in 7H9 broth (Difco, Detroit, MI) supplemented with 0.5% glycerol, 10% OAD (oleic acid dextrose complex without catalase) and 0.05% Tween 80 (M-OADTW broth), or Middlebrook 7H9 supplemented with 10% OAD and 15 g/l Bacto agar (M-OAD agar, Difco) or on 7H11 selective agar (Difco). When necessary, media and plates were supplemented with 80 μg/ml hygromycin or 25 μg/ml kanamycin. Frozen stocks were prepared from strains for experiments by growth standing at 37°C until an OD600 = 0.5 and stored in aliquots at -80°C until use.
Real-time qPCR
Reverse transcription was carried out with the SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR based on Invitrogen’s protocol. Briefly, RNA/primer mixture in each tube was prepared as: total RNA 150 ng, random hexamers (150 ng/ul) 1 ul, 1.25 mM dNTP mix 8 μl, and adding DEPC H2O to 12 μl. The samples were incubated at 65°C for 5 min and then on ice for at least 1 min. Reaction master mixture was prepared as: 5x RT buffer 4 μl, 0.1 M DTT 2 μl, and RNAaseOUT 1 μl. The reaction mixture was added to the RNA/primer mixture, mix briefly, and then place at 37°C for 2 min. One μl (10,000 units) of Super Script III RT was added to each tube, mixed and incubated at 25°C for 10 min. The tubes were then incubated at 37°C for 50 min, heat inactivated at 70°C for 15 min, and then chilled on ice. One μl RNase H was added into the tubes and tubes were incubated at 37°C for 20 min. The first strand cDNA was stored at -20°C until use for real-time PCR. For real-time qPCR, each primer (forward or reverse) concentration in the mixture was 12.5 pmol/μl. 0.4 μl of each primer, Supermix 10 μl, Rox 25 uM 0.4 μl, cDNA or DNA template 2 μl, and H2O were mixed in a total 20 μl volume. Real time qPCR was set up following PCR program on StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System as: 1) 50°C 2 min, 1 cycle; 2) 95°C 2 min, 1 cycle; 3) 95°C 15 s and then 60°C 1 min, 40 cycles to measure the fluorescence. Following the last cycle, the instrument generated a melting curve by ramping from 60°C to 95°C at 0.2°C/s and continuously measuring the fluorescence. 4) 95°C 15 s; and 5) 60°C 1 min, 95°C 15 s, 1 cycle. 16s rRNA was used as an internal control. Primer sequences for tdTomato: F: 5’-CAAGCTGAAGGTGACCAAGG-3’; R: 5’-GTGATGAACTTCGAGGACGG-3’. Primer sequences for 16s rRNA: F: 5’-CCGCAAGRCTAAAACTCAAA-3’; R: 5’-TGCACACAGGCCACAAGGGA-3’. Reactions with amplification cycle threshold values of between 20 and 35 were considered successful and were analyzed with DNA melting curves.
Macrophage Infection Assays
The murine macrophage cell line J774A.1 (ATCC TIB67) was maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2 in high glucose Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Gibco, Bethesda, MD) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco) and 2 mM L-glutamine. J774A.1 cells were infected in a similar manner to that described previously [36]. J774A.1 cells were seeded at 2.5x105 cells/well in 24-well tissue culture plates or 1x105 cells/well in 8-well chamber slides and incubated overnight at 37°C in DMEM. The media was then replaced just prior to infection with 0.2 ml of media that contains 2.5 x 106 bacteria, equivalent to a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of approximately 10 (bacteria/cell). The bacteria were incubated with the cells for 30 min at 37°C and washed twice with warm PBS, then the infected cells were incubated with DMEM plus 10% FBS and 200 μg/ml amikacin for 2 h at 37°C. The cells in a triplicate set of wells were then prepared for microscopy or entry assays.
Mouse Infections
All animal experiments in this study were approved by Texas A&M University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Five to seven week old female BALB/c mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories. All animals were housed in polycarbonate microisolator cages in a controlled environment with 12h light / 12h dark cycle, ~18–23°C, and 40–60% humidity. There were four animals in each experimental group. Animals were assigned randomly to experimental groups, allowed to acclimate to the facilities for one week and fed commercial chow with low chlorophyll content and tap water ad libitum. Portions of lungs were homogenized in PBS, and dilutions were plated on 7H11 selective media to determine numbers of bacteria present at each time point. Sub-cutaneous infections were carried out by suspending the appropriate concentration of bacteria in 50 μl of saline prior to inoculation directly beneath the skin. Bacterial numbers were confirmed at 24 h post-inoculation by harvesting the region of the skin and homogenization in PBS followed by dilution and plating on 7H11 selective media to determine the colony forming units present. Alternatively, mice were infected intratracheally with M. bovis BCG, as described previously [37, 38]. Briefly, mice were anesthetized with ketamine and xylazine mixture by intraperitoneal injection, and were put in a ventral position on a stand. The mouse tongue was pull out of the mouth with a forceps. After seeing the larynx opening with an otoscope, a catheter with the guide wire running through was carefully placed into the larynx. The guide wire was then removed, and 50 μl of bacteria in saline was pipetted into the hub of the catheter. The bacteria were then flushed into lungs with 50 μl of air from a 1 ml syringe. Four mice per group were imaged and sacrificed for necropsy to determine thresholds of detection. Antibiotic treatment was carried out with four mice per group, randomly allocated, by administration of RIF plus INH intraperitoneally daily at 10 mg kg−1 animal body weight. At each time point a group of animals in each treatment category were imaged, necropsied, lungs imaged and homogenized for CFU determination by plating dilutions of tissue homogenates. Each experiment was independently performed twice.
Imaging Tuberculosis Infections
Mice were anesthetized with isofluorane and imaged in an IVIS Spectrum (Caliper Life Sciences) with and without filters for fluorescence. Photographic images were directly overlaid with matching fluorescent images for all mice. Structural images were taken in all cases where fluorescence molecular tomography was used. Wavelength-resolved spectral imaging was carried out to image fluorescent protein-expressing BCG in mice. In the case of tdTomato, the excitation wavelength was 535 nm and emission was collected in 20 nm increments from 540 nm to 660 nm; for mCherry the excitation wavelength was 570 nm and emission was collected in 20 nm increments from 580 nm to 680 nm. Each acquisition was taken for 2–4 s with f-stop one and medium binning. Images were analyzed with Living Image Software v4.1 using spectral unmixing algorithms to remove autofluorescence, as described by the provider, with one of the resulting channels locked to fit the emission spectrum of the appropriate fluorophore (tdTomato or mCherry).
Confocal Fluorescent Microscopy
J774 A.1 cell infection
Cells were seeded in 8-well chamber slides with 1 x 105 cells per well in 200 μl of DMEM plus 10%FBS overnight at 37°C in 5% CO2. The medium was removed and the tdTomato expressing M. bovis BCG was added to each well at an MOI of 10 (bacteria per cell) in 200 μl of medium. The bacteria were co-incubated with the cells for 30 min, washed twice with PBS to remove extracellular bacteria and medium plus 200 μg/ml amikacin added for 2 h at 37°C to select for intracellular bacteria. The cells were then stained with 10 μg/ml DAPI in PBS by incubation for 5 minutes at room temperature, washed twice with PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS the slides were dried and mounted for viewing by confocal fluorescent microscopy.
Cryosections of lungs from infected mice for microscopy
Lungs were removed from intratracheally infected mice, washed with PBS twice, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h. The lungs were then washed with PBS twice and transferred into 30% sucrose until the lungs sank. Lung tissue was placed in the cryomold, overlaid with O.C.T. compound (Sakura Finetek USA Inc.), oriented and frozen quickly on dry ice. Cryosectioning was conducted with the frozen lung tissue, and the lung tissues on the slides were then stained with DAPI. After washing with PBS the slides were dried and mounted for viewing by confocal fluorescent microscopy.
Statistical Analyses
The significance of the results was determined using the Student’s t-test or ANOVA, as appropriate. P values of < 0.05 were considered significant. In figures, * represents P<0.05; ** represents P<0.01; and *** represents P<0.001.
Results
1. tdTomato is the brightest fluorescent protein expressed by mycobacteria in culture
Six FPs, tdTomato, mCherry, mPlum, mKate, Katushka and Keima, were cloned into M. smegmatis, and M. bovis BCG downstream from a mycobacterial Hsp60 promoter. The fluorescent signal was measured under the optimal excitation and emission wavelengths for each FP (tdTomato: ex: 530 nm, em: 590 nm; mCherry: ex: 570 nm, em: 620 nm; mPlum, mKate, Katushka: ex: 570 nm, em: 650 nm; and Keima: ex: 485 nm, em: 620 nm). Absorbance at 600 nm was measured for each strain to estimate bacterial numbers present. The brightness of each strain was calculated by dividing relative fluorescence units of the strain by its optical density (OD) at 600 nm (Fig 1A). In both BCG and M. smegmatis, tdTomato was the brightest FP among the selected FPs, followed by mCherry, mPlum, Katushka, mKate, and Keima.
We evaluated the impact of signal interference due to mammalian tissue by comparing tdTomato and mCherry in Eppendorf tubes filled with M. smegmatis expressing Hsp60-tdTomato or Hsp60-mCherry, and covering the tubes with different thicknesses of sliced ham. These eppendorf tubes covered with sliced ham were then imaged to evaluate the relative fluorescent signal displayed by each strain (S1 Fig). M. smegmatis expressing tdTomato was 5.6-fold brighter than the one expressing mCherry when using the same number of CFU.
The tdTomato and mCherry were then cloned under expression from a L5 promoter and compared with strains expressing tdTomato or mCherry from the Hsp60 promoter. The strains expressing FPs from the L5 promoter are brighter than the ones using the Hsp60 promoter, when fluorescence was measured with a multimode reader (Fig 1B).
2. Mycobacterial CFU can be estimated by fluorescence in vitro
We evaluated the ability to quantify bacterial CFUs using the fluorescent signals from the FP expressing strains. This was accomplished by making dilutions of the bacteria and loading 100 μl of each concentration into a 96-well plate. The fluorescence from the four FP expressing strains correlated very well with bacterial CFUs, R2 = 1 for L5-tdTomato and L5-mCherry; and R2 = 0.999 for Hsp60-tdTomato and Hsp60-mCherry, indicating that we can accurately estimate bacterial CFU with fluorescence.
The multimode reader could detect ≥8,000 CFU of BCG-L5-tdTomato and BCG-Hsp60-tdTomato (Fig 1B), but it could not detect the two mCherry strains at the same CFU. BCG-L5-mCherry could be detected at ≥40,000 CFU, while BCG-Hsp60-mCherry could be detected at ≥200,000 CFU.
Mycobacteria expressing tdTomato and mCherry from the two promoters were compared during infection of mammalian macrophages. J774 A.1 macrophage cell line was infected with the four FP expressing M. bovis BCG strains at five different multiplicities of infection (MOI) (Fig 2). The fluorescent signals from the intracellular BCG strains were measured with a multimode plate reader. Again, tdTomato expressing strains showed higher sensitivity, and strains with the L5 promoter for FPs displayed higher fluorescence than did the strains expressing the reporter from the Hsp60 promoter. The fluorescence levels from the four strains increased as the MOIs went higher (L5-tdTomato, R2 = 0.90; Hsp60-tdTomato, R2 = 0.94; L5-mCherry, R2 = 0.92; Hsp60-mCherry, R2 = 0.93), which should represent a quantitative measure of intracellular CFUs. These observations demonstrate that fluorescence from these strains could be used to accurately estimate intracellular bacterial numbers.
3. Comparison of fluorescence from mycobacteria expressing FPs during subcutaneous infection in mice
To select the best FP expressing strain for imaging in mammalian tissues, we conducted subcutaneous infections in mice. This model allowed us to compare fluorescence detected from different doses of bacteria, and/or different strains on the same mouse, thus background auto fluorescence is well normalized. M. bovis BCG L5-tdTomato, Hsp60-tdTomato, L5-mCherry, and Hsp60-mCherry were subcutaneously inoculated into BALB/c mice. The fluorescent signals were evaluated using epi-illumination imaging and optimal excitation and emission wavelengths for tdTomato and mCherry, respectively. Images were analyzed by spectral unmixing to separate FP specific signal from autofluorescence in the animals (Fig 3). Detailed imaging protocols are described elsewhere [37]. The BCG strain carrying the plasmid backbone without a FP was used as a negative control in each mouse. At the same CFU, the BCG-L5-tdTomato strain displays higher fluorescence than the BCG-Hsp60-tdTomato strain; and tdTomato expressing strains display significantly higher fluorescence than mCherry expressing strains. Imaging allows detection of ≥106 CFU of both BCG-L5-tdTomato and BCG-Hsp60-tdTomato strains in mice after subcutaneous inoculation by epi-illumination imaging. We chose the L5-tdTomato strain for future experiments, because it showed the highest fluorescence at optimal excitation and emission wavelengths after adjusting for bacterial numbers, in vitro and in vivo.
4. Expression of tdTomato did not affect mycobacterium growth in culture medium, and the plasmids were stably carried by mycobacterial strains
Expression of a foreign gene could be toxic to the host bacteria, and thus slows down bacterial growth [19]. We evaluated whether expression of tdTomato affects mycobacterium growth. M. bovis BCG strains with plasmids expressing tdTomato under L5 or Hsp60 promoter were compared with strains carrying the vector plasmids alone. OD values at 600 nm for each strain was measured at each time point. There were no significant differences in growth curves among L5-tdTomato or Hsp60-tdTomato strains and the strains carrying vectors alone (Fig 4A). These observations suggest that expression of tdTomato does not affect bacterial growth.
Recombinant bacterial strains carrying plasmids require selective antibiotic in culture media to ensure they are maintained. We evaluated stability of the tdTomato expressing plasmid in mycobacteria without the selective pressure of antibiotic. M. bovis BCG carrying L5-tdTomato was cultured in MOAD with or without kanamycin, initially inoculated at OD600 0.005 and grown for 18 days. Fluorescence and OD600 during culture were measured. As shown in Fig 4B–4E. The L5-tdTomato expressing strain cultured in medium without antibiotic had the similar levels of fluorescence and OD as cultured in medium with the selective antibiotic for the entire 18-day of culture, which suggests the strain can carry the plasmid stably for at least 18 days without antibiotics. Correlations between fluorescence and OD600 were analyzed within the range of OD600 from 0.05 to 1. With or without the selective antibiotic in media, the fluorescence from this strain correlates well with bacterial numbers (OD600), suggesting the measured fluorescence of this strain can be a good surrogate for bacterial numbers.
5. In vivo imaging mice intratracheally infected with mycobacteria expressing tdTomato
We evaluated detection of the BCG-L5-tdTomato strain during pulmonary infections in mice. BALB/c mice were intratracheally infected and imaged by transillumination at day 1 post infection. The intratracheal infection model allowed us to directly deliver precise doses of bacteria, even higher doses than using aerosols are easily possible, into mouse lungs and to evaluate correlation between in vivo detected fluorescence and bacterial CFU. Bacterial numbers in the lungs were confirmed by conventional CFU determination. The results are shown as Fig 5A. Imaging can detect as low as 6.5 x 104 CFU of BCG-L5-tdTomato during pulmonary infection using transillumination. The in vivo imaging results were verified with ex vivo imaging by epi-illumination of lungs harvested from the same mice (Fig 5B). The fluorescence correlated well with CFUs recovered after plating lung homogenates (R2 = 0.96, Fig 5C). The bacteria in lungs were further confirmed by fluorescence confocal microscopy on cryosections from lung tissues (Fig 5D).
6. Application of tdTomato expressing mycobacteria to evaluation of anti-TB therapeutic efficacy
We are interested in whether FP expressing bacteria can speed TB research involved in evaluation of candidate anti-TB therapeutic compounds. The BCG-L5-tdTomato strain was loaded into 96-well plates and treated with rifampin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH). Fluorescence changes over time were measured with a multimode reader (Fig 6) and fluorescent imager (S2 Fig) with and without treatment over 96 hours. We found that in the untreated group fluorescence increased as the bacteria replicate; whereas, the treated group displayed reduced fluorescence over time. The difference in fluorescence between treated and untreated groups was significant by 24 h treatment.
We also evaluated if tdTomato expressing mycobacterial strains can be applied to evaluation of anti-TB therapy in vivo during pulmonary infections. BALB/c mice were intratracheally infected with 107 CFU of M. bovis BCG L5-tdTomato, treated with RIF and INH daily by i.p., and imaged at day 0, 2 and 6 post-treatment. Starting from day 2, the treated group displayed reduced fluorescence in the lungs (Fig 7). These observations demonstrate that a tdTomato expressing mycobacterial strain can be used to rapidly evaluate anti-TB therapeutic efficacy. Imaging is more time efficient than the previously standard approach of using conventional CFU plating methods to determine therapeutic efficacy.
7. The L5-tdTomato expressing M. bovis BCG strain carries more tdTomato gene copies than the Hsp60-tdTomato strain
We investigated the reasons that the M. bovis BCG L5-tdTomato strain displays higher fluorescence intensity than the Hsp60-tdTomato strain. At first, protein levels present in the L5-tdTomato and Hsp60-tdTomato strains were compared. Cell lysates of BCG-L5-tdTomato and BCG-Hsp60-tdTomato were evaluated using 100 μg of total protein with a multimode plate reader (Fig 8A). The L5-tdTomato strain had two- to three-fold higher fluorescence than the Hsp60-tdTomato strain. We also compared these strains by Western analyses using antibody against RFP for tdTomato and anti-GroEL2 as a control for protein levels. As shown in Fig 8B and 8C, the tdTomato protein expressed from the L5 promoter is approximately two-fold higher than the level expressed from the Hsp60 promoter. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR was used to compare the transcript levels for the tdTomato gene expressed from the L5 and Hsp60 promoters. As shown in Fig 8D, the tdTomato transcript number when expressed from the L5 promoter is also less than two-fold higher than that expressed from the Hsp60 promoter. Subsequently, gene copy numbers in the two strains were also compared with DNAs as templates using real-time qPCR. Interestingly, the strain having L5 promoter had four-fold higher plasmid copy number than did the strain having Hsp60 promoter (Fig 8E). We conclude that the higher fluorescence intensity of L5-tdTomato strain than the Hsp60-tdTomato strain is a result of more plasmid copy numbers in the L5-tdTomato strain than in the Hsp60-tdTomato strain. Interestingly, despite the four-fold higher copy number, only two-fold higher transcript and proteins levels are observed, suggesting that higher protein levels are blocked.
Discussion
The slow growth of M. tuberculosis has hindered research toward discovery and translational development of novel anti-TB therapeutics and vaccines. Noninvasive in vivo imaging technologies are emerging for quantification of bacterial loads in animals and has the potential to greatly accelerate TB research. We examined M. bovis BCG strains expressing various FPs to select an optimal FP and promoter to allow detection of mycobacteria in vitro and in vivo with fluorescence imaging. Among the selected FPs, we found that tdTomato expressing strains display the greatest fluorescence as compared to other FP expressing strains. When expressed from the L5 promoter, there is a higher level of expression of tdTomato than from the Hsp60 promoter. Interestingly, when we compared the plasmid DNA copy number between the two strains, the L5 promoter strain had a higher copy number for tdTomato, which is four-fold higher than the copy number in the Hsp60 promoter strain. We speculate that tdTomato may be somewhat toxic if overexpressed in the bacteria. Although the L5 promoter strain carries more gene copies than the Hsp60 promoter strain, the L5 promoter strain only expresses slightly higher tdTomato transcript numbers, minimizing the toxicity of tdTomato to the bacterium. To our knowledge, this is the first report of mechanisms responsible for fluorescence intensity differences between FP-labeled bacteria that are due to FP copy number levels at the protein, RNA and DNA level. The results provide insight into strategies for design and construction of FP expressing vectors. To select FP for in vivo imaging, they must be examined not only for brightness and excitation and emission wavelengths, but also for the maximal FP expression levels possible in the particular bacterium carrying the construct.
As previously shown by Carroll et al [10] and Zelmer et al [14], the fluorescent signal in our FP labeled bacteria correlates very well with bacterial numbers by CFU, suggesting that the L5-tdTomato expressing strain can be used to quantify bacterial numbers in vitro and in vivo immediately, allowing the potential to replace conventional CFU numeration for quantification of bacterial numbers during infection. This tdTomato expressing strain also offers the opportunity to more rapidly evaluate new TB therapeutic regimen in vitro and in vivo. As the lowest number of bacteria can be detected with this method is 6.5X104 CFU in vivo, other methods with better sensitivities should be applied when quantification of bacteria lower than this limit is required in therapy efficacy evaluation.
Among all the selected fluorescent proteins, tdTomato displays the greatest fluorescence, 5.9-fold that of mCherry [33, 39]. The structure of tdTomato is a tandem dimer of mCherry with a few single nucleotide changes [39]. Although tdTomato’s maximum excitation and emission wavelength are lower than 600 nm, which is outside the “NIR window”, the sensitivity for detection of tdTomato expressing mycobacteria is greater than that of mCherry expressing mycobacteria in vivo. The greater brightness of tdTomato is the most likely explanation for this difference. The brightness of tdTomato ensures that hemoglobin and water within mammalian tissue only absorb a portion of the excitation light and emission signal.
Both luciferase and fluorescent protein labeled mycobacterial strains have been developed for TB studies [10, 11, 13–19, 40]. Three of these reporter systems have been applied to in vivo detection of Mtb infection in mice [11, 14, 18, 19]. The sensitivity of our tdTomato expressing strain is similar to that using a luciferase expressing strain [11]. However, we have developed another in vivo imaging strategy designated reporter enzyme fluorescence (REF), in which mycobacteria are detected using a fluorogenic substrate for the mycobacterial beta-lactamase. With a REF substrate, CNIR5, we can detect 104 CFU of mycobacteria in lungs of live mice [12]. Both our tdTomato expressing M. bovis BCG strain and the luciferase expressing Mtb strain are somewhat less sensitive than REF imaging of Mtb infection in vivo. Unlike REF- and luciferase-based imaging, imaging with FP expressing strains do not require administration of a substrate, or time for the substrate to reach peak levels in tissues. These characteristics offer the advantage that our FP reporter strains can be repeatedly imaged over very short periods of time, without having to wait for clearance of previous imaging probes. If brighter fluorescent proteins with longer excitation and emission wavelengths can be developed, the sensitivity of imaging with FP expressing strains could reach that of REF technologies, but still would require recombinant strains, which have their inherent limitations. These limitations could include the inability to image clinical strains without recombinant modification, potential impacts on virulence of pathogenic strains and potential toxicity due to overexpression of reporters.
Another imaging technique that does not require substrate uses the bacterial luxCDABE operon, which includes both luciferase and luciferase substrate genes. Mycobacterial strains expressing luxCDABE have been used to evaluate anti-TB therapy efficacies [15, 16, 18, 40]. It has been reported that high level expression of luxD is toxic to mycobacteria, because luxD encodes an acyl transferase involved in bacterial cell wall fatty acid modification [19]. This explains why all mycobacterial whole lux-operon based strains developed to date have incorporated a single copy of the operon in the mycobacterial chromosome [15, 18, 19]. We did not find that expression of tdTomato affected bacterial growth under laboratory culture conditions.
We used strains carrying plasmids expressing multi-copy FP genes. It has been reported that plasmids carrying FP in mycobacterial strains are stable over days to weeks [10]. Our results demonstrate that the tdTomato expressing strain can stably maintain the plasmid for as long as 18 days without antibiotic selective pressure, as has been shown by others previously [10, 14]. This feature makes it suitable for long term in vitro and in vivo experiments, even without administration of the antibiotic. Our ongoing studies are designed to ensure that mycobacteria express these FPs in a more stable manner using single copy tdTomato and mCherry expressing constructs that are site-specifically integrated into the mycobacterial chromosome, using a mycobacterial plasmid containing the phage attachment site attP and the L5 integrase (int) gene from the mycobacteriophage L5 genome. These constructs integrate tdTomato or mCherry into the mycobacterial chromosome via site-specific recombination of the plasmid-borne attP site with the chromosomal attB site, as has been shown by others for bioluminescent reporters [11, 19]. Although these strains carry single copy of fluorescent protein genes, it may not necessary lead to lower fluorescence than strains carrying more copies of fluorescent protein genes. A previous study compared luminescence among Mtb strains carrying higher copy, low copy, and single copy chromosomal luminescent genes, and revealed that the highest luminescence was expressed in strains carrying single copy luminescent genes [19]. Similarly, another study compared Mtb strains expressing high and low copy of fluorescent protein genes, and found that fluorescence from the higher copy strains were not higher than that from lower copy strains [10]. With the strains carrying FPs in chromosome, long-term animal or cell infection experiments could be conducted in the absence of plasmid selection.
In summary, in agreement with a previous study by others [14] we have demonstrated that in vivo fluorescence imaging with FP-expressing mycobacterial strains can be used to quantify bacterial load in animals, which, once more widely applied, could significantly accelerate TB research, particular for analysis of novel therapies and during vaccine development.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health grant number R21HL115463 (YK), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grant number R01AI104960 (JDC) and by Grant 48523 from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (JDC).
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health, grant number R21HL115463 (Y.K.); the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, grant number R01AI104960 (J.D.C.); and by grant 48523 from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (J.D.C.). PerkinElmer provided support in the form of salaries for authors A.A. and K.P.F., but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the "author contributions" section.
References
- 1.WHO. Global tuberculosis control—surveillance, planning, financing. WHO Report 2004. WHO/HTM/TB/2004.331 2004. Available: http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/2004/en/.
- 2.Fine P. Stopping routine vaccination for tuberculosis in schools. Bmj. 2005;331(7518):647–8. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Godfrey-Faussett P, Ayles H. Can we control tuberculosis in high HIV prevalence settings? Tuberculosis. 2003;83(1–3):68–76. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Winnard PT Jr, Kluth JB, Raman V. Noninvasive optical tracking of red fluorescent protein-expressing cancer cells in a model of metastatic breast cancer. Neoplasia. 2006;8(10):796–806. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kim D, Hung CF, Wu TC. Monitoring the trafficking of adoptively transferred antigen- specific CD8-positive T cells in vivo, using noninvasive luminescence imaging. Human gene therapy. 2007;18(7):575–88. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jakobs S, Subramaniam V, Schonle A, Jovin TM, Hell SW. EFGP and DsRed expressing cultures of Escherichia coli imaged by confocal, two-photon and fluorescence lifetime microscopy. FEBS letters. 2000;479(3):131–5. Epub 2000/09/12. doi: S0014579300018962 [pii]. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schweichel D, Steitz J, Tormo D, Gaffal E, Ferrer A, Buchs S, et al. Evaluation of DNA vaccination with recombinant adenoviruses using bioluminescence imaging of antigen expression: impact of application routes and delivery with dendritic cells. J Gene Med. 2006;8(10):1243–50. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Andreu N, Zelmer A, Wiles S. Noninvasive biophotonic imaging for studies of infectious disease. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011;35(2):360–94. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00252.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hutchens M, Luker GD. Applications of bioluminescence imaging to the study of infectious diseases. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9(10):2315–22. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Carroll P, Schreuder LJ, Muwanguzi-Karugaba J, Wiles S, Robertson BD, Ripoll J, et al. Sensitive detection of gene expression in mycobacteria under replicating and non-replicating conditions using optimized far-red reporters. PloS one. 2010;5(3):e9823 Epub 2010/03/31. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Andreu N, Zelmer A, Sampson SL, Ikeh M, Bancroft GJ, Schaible UE, et al. Rapid in vivo assessment of drug efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis using an improved firefly luciferase. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68(9):2118–27. 10.1093/jac/dkt155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kong Y, Yao H, Ren H, Subbian S, Cirillo SL, Sacchettini JC, et al. Imaging tuberculosis with endogenous beta-lactamase reporter enzyme fluorescence in live mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107(27):12239–44. Epub 2010/06/23. 1000643107 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.1000643107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ollinger J, Bailey MA, Moraski GC, Casey A, Florio S, Alling T, et al. A dual read-out assay to evaluate the potency of compounds active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PloS one. 2013;8(4):e60531 10.1371/journal.pone.0060531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zelmer A, Carroll P, Andreu N, Hagens K, Mahlo J, Redinger N, et al. A new in vivo model to test anti-tuberculosis drugs using fluorescence imaging. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(8):1948–60. 10.1093/jac/dks161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vocat A, Hartkoorn RC, Lechartier B, Zhang M, Dhar N, Cole ST, et al. Bioluminescence for assessing drug potency against nonreplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(7):4012–9. 10.1128/AAC.00528-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Andreu N, Fletcher T, Krishnan N, Wiles S, Robertson BD. Rapid measurement of antituberculosis drug activity in vitro and in macrophages using bioluminescence. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(2):404–14. 10.1093/jac/dkr472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Singh V, Biswas RK, Singh BN. Double recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG strain for screening of primary and rationale-based antimycobacterial compounds. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(3):1389–96. 10.1128/AAC.01301-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang T, Li SY, Nuermberger EL. Autoluminescent Mycobacterium tuberculosis for rapid, real-time, non-invasive assessment of drug and vaccine efficacy. PloS one. 2012;7(1):e29774 10.1371/journal.pone.0029774 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Andreu N, Zelmer A, Fletcher T, Elkington PT, Ward TH, Ripoll J, et al. Optimisation of bioluminescent reporters for use with mycobacteria. PloS one. 2010;5(5):e10777 10.1371/journal.pone.0010777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Passamaneck YJ, Di Gregorio A, Papaioannou VE, Hadjantonakis AK. Live imaging of fluorescent proteins in chordate embryos: from ascidians to mice. Microsc Res Tech. 2006;69(3):160–7. Epub 2006/03/16. 10.1002/jemt.20284 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wacker SA, Oswald F, Wiedenmann J, Knochel W. A green to red photoconvertible protein as an analyzing tool for early vertebrate development. Developmental dynamics: an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists. 2007;236(2):473–80. Epub 2006/09/12. 10.1002/dvdy.20955 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Benard EL, van der Sar AM, Ellett F, Lieschke GJ, Spaink HP, Meijer AH. Infection of zebrafish embryos with intracellular bacterial pathogens. Journal of visualized experiments: JoVE. 2012;(61). 10.3791/3781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Davis JM, Clay H, Lewis JL, Ghori N, Herbomel P, Ramakrishnan L. Real-time visualization of mycobacterium-macrophage interactions leading to initiation of granuloma formation in zebrafish embryos. Immunity. 2002;17(6):693–702. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.van der Sar AM, Musters RJ, van Eeden FJ, Appelmelk BJ, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Bitter W. Zebrafish embryos as a model host for the real time analysis of Salmonella typhimurium infections. Cell Microbiol. 2003;5(9):601–11. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hoffman RM. Advantages of multi-color fluorescent proteins for whole-body and in vivo cellular imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2005;10(4):41202 Epub 2005/09/24. 10.1117/1.1992485 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stewart CN Jr. Go with the glow: fluorescent proteins to light transgenic organisms. Trends Biotechnol. 2006;24(4):155–62. Epub 2006/02/21. S0167-7799(06)00030-8 [pii] 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.02.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Seitz G, Warmann SW, Fuchs J, Mau-Holzmann UA, Ruck P, Heitmann H, et al. Visualization of xenotransplanted human rhabdomyosarcoma after transfection with red fluorescent protein. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41(8):1369–76. Epub 2006/07/26. S0022-3468(06)00308-3 [pii] 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.04.039 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shcherbo D, Merzlyak EM, Chepurnykh TV, Fradkov AF, Ermakova GV, Solovieva EA, et al. Bright far-red fluorescent protein for whole-body imaging. Nat Methods. 2007;4(9):741–6. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Weissleder R. A clearer vision for in vivo imaging. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19(4):316–7. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Muller-Taubenberger A, Anderson KI. Recent advances using green and red fluorescent protein variants. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 2007;77(1):1–12. Epub 2007/08/21. 10.1007/s00253-007-1131-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang L, Jackson WC, Steinbach PA, Tsien RY. Evolution of new nonantibody proteins via iterative somatic hypermutation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(48):16745–9. Epub 2004/11/24. 0407752101 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.0407752101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kogure T, Karasawa S, Araki T, Saito K, Kinjo M, Miyawaki A. A fluorescent variant of a protein from the stony coral Montipora facilitates dual-color single-laser fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24(5):577–81. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shaner NC, Steinbach PA, Tsien RY. A guide to choosing fluorescent proteins. Nat Methods. 2005;2(12):905–9. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mehta PK, Pandey AK, Subbian S, El-Etr SH, Cirillo SL, Samrakandi MM, et al. Identification of Mycobacterium marinum macrophage infection mutants. Microb Pathog. 2006;40(4):139–51. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Miltner E, Daroogheh K, Mehta PK, Cirillo SL, Cirillo JD, Bermudez LE. Identification of Mycobacterium avium genes that affect invasion of the intestinal epithelium. Infection and immunity. 2005;73(7):4214–21. 10.1128/IAI.73.7.4214-4221.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Subbian S, Mehta PK, Cirillo SL, Bermudez LE, Cirillo JD. A Mycobacterium marinum mel2 mutant is defective for growth in macrophages that produce reactive oxygen and reactive nitrogen species. Infect Immun. 2007;75(1):127–34. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kong Y, Akin AR, Francis KP, Zhang N, Troy TL, Xie H, et al. Whole-Body Imaging of Infection Using Fluorescence Current protocols in microbiology: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kong Y, Shi Y, Chang M, Akin AR, Francis KP, Zhang N, et al. Whole-Body Imaging of Infection Using Bioluminescence Current protocols in microbiology: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shaner NC, Campbell RE, Steinbach PA, Giepmans BN, Palmer AE, Tsien RY. Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22(12):1567–72. 10.1038/nbt1037 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sharma S, Gelman E, Narayan C, Bhattacharjee D, Achar V, Humnabadkar V, et al. Simple and rapid method to determine antimycobacterial potency of compounds by using autoluminescent Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(10):5801–8. 10.1128/AAC.03205-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.