Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1972 Nov;25(11):966–969. doi: 10.1136/jcp.25.11.966

Further study of strontium selenite and selenite F broths for the isolation of Salmonella typhi

P Y Chau 1,2, C R Forrest 1,2
PMCID: PMC477576  PMID: 4648541

Abstract

The efficiency of strontium selenite and selenite F broths in the isolation of S. typhi from 625 clinical stool specimens were compared. A total of 126 strains of S. typhi were detected. Of these, 96 (76%) were isolated with selenite F broth and 118 (94%) were isolated with strontium selenite broth. At the same time, the number of false positive isolates accruing to strontium selenite broth was less than that accruing to selenite F broth. The superiority of strontium selenite broth over selenite F broth was more obvious when relatively few typhoid bacilli were present in faeces, eg, after antibiotic therapy, or when stools had been left for prolonged periods at room termperature. In the isolation of S. typhi with strontium selenite broth, salmonella-shigella agar was found to be a better plating medium than xylose lysine desoxycholate agar.

Full text

PDF
966

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BANIC S. A NEW ENRICHMENT MEDIUM FOR SALMONELLAE. J Hyg (Lond) 1964 Mar;62:25–28. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400039735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Iveson J. B., Mackay-Scollay E. M. Strontium chloride and strontium selenite enrichment broth media in the isolation of Salmonella. J Hyg (Lond) 1969 Sep;67(3):457–464. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400041875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. KONFORTI N., NAVON B., RAPPAPORT F. A new enrichment medium for certain Salmonellae. J Clin Pathol. 1956 Aug;9(3):261–266. doi: 10.1136/jcp.9.3.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. SMITH H. W. The evaluation of culture media for the isolation of salmonellae from faeces. J Hyg (Lond) 1952 Mar;50(1):21–36. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400019409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Taylor W. I., Schelhart D. Isolation of Shigellae. 8. Comparison of xylose lysine deoxycholate agar, hektoen enteric agar, Salmonella-Shigella agar, and eosin methylene blue agar with stool specimens. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Jan;21(1):32–37. doi: 10.1128/am.21.1.32-37.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES