Abstract
The general performance of the Technicon AutoAnalyzer II method for the routine estimation of serum aspartate and alanine transaminase has been assessed and compared with that of the LKB reaction rate analyser. The results of the two methods correlate, there is little difference in precision, and running costs are comparable. Some of the relative advantages of the two types of analysis are discussed.
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- HENRY R. J., CHIAMORI N., GOLUB O. J., BERKMAN S. Revised spectrophotometric methods for the determination of glutamic-oxalacetic transaminase, glutamic-pyruvic transaminase, and lactic acid dehydrogenase. Am J Clin Pathol. 1960 Oct;34:381–398. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/34.4_ts.381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Recommended scheme for the evaluation of instruments for automatic analysis in the clinical biochemistry laboratory. J Clin Pathol. 1969 May;22(3):278–284. doi: 10.1136/jcp.22.3.278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith A. F., Brown S. S., Taylor R. Assessment of an automatic enzyme reaction rate monitor. Clin Chim Acta. 1970 Oct;30(1):105–113. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(70)90198-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]