Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2016 Mar 3;4(2):e00037-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00037-16

Draft Genome Sequence of a Strictly Anaerobic Dichloromethane-Degrading Bacterium

Sara Kleindienst a,*,, Steven A Higgins c, Despina Tsementzi e, Konstantinos T Konstantinidis e,f, E Erin Mack g, Frank E Löffler a,b,c,d,
PMCID: PMC4777747  PMID: 26941136

Abstract

An anaerobic, dichloromethane-degrading bacterium affiliated with novel Peptococcaceae was maintained in a microbial consortium. The organism originated from pristine freshwater sediment collected from Rio Mameyes in Luquillo, Puerto Rico, in October 2009 (latitude 18°21′43.9″, longitude −65°46′8.4″). The draft genome sequence is 2.1 Mb and has a G+C content of 43.5%.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Dichloromethane (DCM, methylene chloride) is an anthropogenic contaminant of groundwater that also occurs naturally, and is susceptible to aerobic and anaerobic degradation (15). DCM degradation under oxic and denitrifying conditions is well characterized (1, 6). In the absence of oxygen or nitrate, DCM degradation was associated with the formation of formate, acetate, and inorganic chloride (79). The only described pure culture capable of anaerobic DCM degradation is Dehalobacterium formicoaceticum (7). Enzyme assays using Dehalobacterium formicoaceticum extracts suggested that DCM metabolism proceeds via the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway; however, detailed mechanistic understanding and genome information is lacking (10).

A metagenome was generated from a microbial consortium, which utilized DCM as the sole energy source under anoxic conditions. DNA was extracted as described (11). A DNA library for Illumina MiSeq sequencing was constructed using the Nextera DNA sample preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and evaluated using the Qubit double-stranded DNA broad range reagent kit (Life Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA) with a Qubit fluorometer (Thermo, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), a 7500 DNA kit on a 2100 Bioanalyzer instrument (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and a KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR kit (KAPA Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA). Following manufacturer protocols, a 20-pM library was sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq sequencer using a v3 MiSeq reagent kit. The sequencing run produced 15,719,461 paired-end reads, which were filtered using the High-Throughput Quality Control (HTQC) toolkit (12) with a minimum phred score of 20 and a minimum read length of 100, yielding 13,003,937 paired-end reads. The quality-filtered reads were assembled with the Velvet (13), RAY (14) and Newbler v2.6 (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany) assemblers (15). Contigs longer than 500 bp (n = 32,063) were binned using MetaWatt (version 1.7) (16). Initial analyses of the contigs with MetaWatt identified a set of 42 contigs with distinct G+C content, tetranucleotide frequencies, and consistent association with publicly available genomes of the Peptococcaceae family (7.4% of all fragments). Reassembly of aligned metagenomic reads to the 42 binned contigs decreased contamination by 0.26% and resulted in a draft genome of 75 contigs with >500 nt. The obtained genome was evaluated for its completeness (92.47%) and contamination (4.44%) using CheckM v0.9.7, based on the detection of 420 single copy marker genes found in 35 Clostridia genomes (17). Analysis of tetranucleotide frequencies, coding density space, and G+C content distributions flagged 22 contigs as outliers, which were excluded from further analysis, and reduced the contamination estimate to 1.21%.

The final draft genome consisted of 53 contigs with total size 2,076,422 bp and a G+C content of 43.5%. Gene annotations were performed with the IMG pipeline (18), resulting in 2,395 predicted genes and 2,323 protein coding sequences. The genome encodes the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway (8 genes), hydrogenases (21 genes), sporulation (48 genes), and chemotaxis (11 genes) as well as motility proteins (i.e., a flagellum; 27 genes).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The draft genome has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession number LNDB00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, LNDB01000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Carmen Lebrón and Hans Stroo for their courageous efforts with sample collection.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the Corporate Remediation Group, E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Newark, Delaware, USA, and, in part, by SERDP project ER-2312.

Footnotes

Citation Kleindienst S, Higgins SA, Tsementzi D, Konstantinidis KT, Mack EE, Löffler FE. 2016. Draft genome sequence of a strictly anaerobic dichloromethane-degrading bacterium. Genome Announc 4(2):e00037-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00037-16.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Leisinger T, Braus-Stromeyer SA. 1995. Bacterial growth with chlorinated methanes. Environ Health Perspect 103:33–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Egli C, Tschan T, Scholtz R, Cook AM, Leisinger T. 1988. Transformation of tetrachloromethane to dichloromethane and carbon dioxide by Acetobacterium woodii. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:2819–2824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mägli A, Rainey FA, Leisinger T. 1995. Acetogenesis from dichloromethane by a two-component mixed culture comprising a novel bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:2943–2949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Freedman DL, Gossett JM. 1991. Biodegradation of dichloromethane and its utilization as a growth substrate under methanogenic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:2847–2857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Freedman DL, Smith CR, Noguera DR. 1997. Dichloromethane biodegradation under nitrate-reducing conditions. Water Environ Res 69:115–122. doi: 10.2175/106143097X125245. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nikolausz M, Nijenhuis I, Ziller K, Richnow HH, Kästner M. 2006. Stable carbon isotope fractionation during degradation of dichloromethane by methylotrophic bacteria. Environ Microbiol 8:156–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00878.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mägli A, Wendt M, Leisinger T. 1996. Isolation and characterization of Dehalobacterium formicoaceticum gen. nov. sp. nov., a strictly anaerobic bacterium utilizing dichloromethane as source of carbon and energy. Arch Microbiol 166:101–108. doi: 10.1007/s002030050362. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Justicia-Leon SD, Ritalahti KM, Mack EE, Löffler FE. 2012. Dichloromethane fermentation by a Dehalobacter sp. in an enrichment culture derived from pristine river sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:1288–1291. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07325-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lee M, Low A, Zemb O, Koenig J, Michaelsen A, Manefield M. 2012. Complete chloroform dechlorination by organochlorine respiration and fermentation. Environ Microbiol 14:883–894. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02656.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mägli A, Messmer M, Leisinger T. 1998. Metabolism of dichloromethane by the strict anaerobe Dehalobacterium formicoaceticum. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:646–650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wilson K. 2001. Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria. In Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yang X, Liu D, Liu F, Wu J, Zou J, Xiao X, Zhao F, Zhu B. 2013. HTQC: a fast quality control toolkit for Illumina sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 14:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Boisvert S, Laviolette F, Corbeil J. 2010. Ray: simultaneous assembly of reads from a mix of high-throughput sequencing technologies. J Comput Biol 17:1519–1533. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2009.0238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Luo C, Tsementzi D, Kyrpides N, Read T, Konstantinidis KT. 2012. Direct comparisons of Illumina vs. Roche 454 sequencing technologies on the same microbial community DNA sample. PLoS One 7:e30087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Strous M, Kraft B, Bisdorf R, Tegetmeyer HE. 2012. The binning of metagenomic contigs for microbial physiology of mixed cultures. Front Microbiol 3:410. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Markowitz VM, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen I-MA, Chu K, Kyrpides NC. 2009. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics 25:2271–2278. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES