Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2016 Mar 3;4(2):e00062-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00062-16

Draft Genome Sequences of Streptomyces scabiei S58, Streptomyces turgidiscabies T45, and Streptomyces acidiscabies a10, the Pathogens of Potato Common Scab, Isolated in Japan

Tsuyoshi Tomihama a,, Yatsuka Nishi a, Masao Sakai b, Makoto Ikenaga b, Takashi Okubo c, Seishi Ikeda d
PMCID: PMC4777755  PMID: 26941144

Abstract

The draft genome sequences of the three pathogens of potato common scab, Streptomyces scabiei S58, Streptomyces turgidiscabies T45, and Streptomyces acidiscabies a10, isolated in Japan, are presented here. The genome size of each strain is >10 Mb, and the three pathogenic strains share genes located in a pathogenicity island previously described in other pathogenic Streptomyces species.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Potato common scab (PCS) disease, caused by pathogenic Streptomyces spp., occurs throughout potato-growing areas in Japan and elsewhere in the world (1). Pathogenic Streptomyces spp. produce a virulent phytotoxin, thaxtomin A, a cellulose synthesis inhibitor defective in plant cell walls, and they possess a conserved biosynthetic operon for the synthesis of thaxtomin in a mobile large pathogenic island (PAI) (24). In Japan, at least three pathogenic Streptomyces spp. have been shown to cause PCS: S. scabiei, S. turgidiscabies, and S. acidiscabies (5). Of these species, both S. scabiei (6) and S. turgidiscabies (7) are common pathogens in most potato cultivation areas in Japan (8), and reducing the soil pH to <5.2 has been recommended for suppressing PCS (9). However, S. acidiscabies, which is an emergent pathogen as a result of a recent acquisition of a PAI, is able to tolerate a lower pH than S. scabiei and S. turgidiscabies, and there are concerns of its spread in potato-growing areas with low-pH soils (5, 10). While genome sequences are available for several pathogenic Streptomyces species (24), no genome sequence is available for the Japanese isolates. Here, we present the draft genome sequences of three pathogenic strains isolated in Japan, S. scabiei S58, S. turgidiscabies T45, and S. acidiscabies a10.

The genome sequences of the three pathogenic strains were obtained by assembly of data sets generated by MiSeq paired-end sequence strategies utilizing the SPAdes genome assembler (version 3.5.0) (11). The Prokka annotation pipeline (version 1.11) was used to predict coding sequences (CDSs), rRNA genes, tRNA genes, and noncoding RNA (12). The sequence characteristics of the strains are listed in Table 1. The CDSs obtained from the three sequenced genomes were clustered using the CD-HIT algorithm (13), with a 70% sequence identity cutoff. A total of 18,502 clusters were identified, and of these, 3,080 clusters (16.6%), which included the previously described thaxtomin synthetic genes (24), were shared in all strains. These sequences provide a wealth of data for genome comparisons between strains with different pH tolerances, and they enable a great understanding of the emergence of pathogens.

TABLE 1 .

Summary of genome sequencing results in the present study

Strain Genome size (bp) G+C content (%) No. of scaffolds N50 (bp) No. of CDSsa No. of tRNAs Accession no.
S. scabiei S58 10,003,030 71.5 158 193,185 8,629 84 BCMM00000000
S. turgidiscabies T45 10,579,795 69.9 103 264,425 9,264 84 BCMN00000000
S. acidiscabies a10 10,726,382 70.6 285 82,196 9,295 90 BCMK00000000
a

CDS, coding sequence.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The nucleotide sequence accession numbers for GenBank are found in Table 1. The versions described in this paper are the first versions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This study was supported by the Cross-Ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP), “Technologies for creating next-generation agriculture, forestry and fisheries” (funding agency: Bio-Oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution, NARO).

Footnotes

Citation Tomihama T, Nishi Y, Sakai M, Ikenaga M, Okubo T, Ikeda S. 2016. Draft genome sequences of Streptomyces scabiei S58, Streptomyces turgidiscabies T45, and Streptomyces acidiscabies a10, the pathogens of potato common scab, isolated in Japan. Genome Announc 4(2):e00062-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00062-16.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Dees MW, Wanner LA. 2012. In search of better management of potato common scab. Potato Res 55:249–268. doi: 10.1007/s11540-012-9206-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kers JA, Cameron KD, Joshi MV, Bukhalid RA, Morello JE, Wach MJ, Gibson DM, Loria R. 2005. A large, mobile pathogenicity island confers plant pathogenicity on Streptomyces species. Mol Microbiol 55:1025–1033. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04461.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Huguet-Tapia JC, Badger JH, Loria R, Pettis GS. 2011. Streptomyces turgidiscabies Car8 contains a modular pathogenicity island that shares virulence genes with other actinobacterial plant pathogens. Plasmid 65:118–124. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2010.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Huguet-Tapia JC, Loria R. 2012. Draft genome sequence of Streptomyces acidiscabies 84–104, an emergent plant pathogen. J Bacteriol 194:1847. doi: 10.1128/JB.06767-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tashiro N, Manabe K, Saito A, Miyashita K. 2012. Identification of potato scab-causing Streptomyces sp. occurring in strongly acidic soils in Saga Prefecture in Japan. J Gen Plant Pathol 78:353–359. doi: 10.1007/s10327-012-0393-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lambert DH, Loria R. 1989. Streptomyces scabies sp. nov., nom. rev. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39:387–392. doi: 10.1099/00207713-39-4-387. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Miyajima K, Tanaka F, Takeuchi T, Kuninaga S. 1998. Streptomyces turgidiscabies sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48:495–502. doi: 10.1099/00207713-48-2-495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nishi Y, Nakamura M, Iwai H. 2015. Species-specific real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction to quantify common scab pathogens in plants and soil in bottomless frame pots. Jpn J Phytopathol 81:32–42 (In Japanese.). doi: 10.3186/jjphytopath.81.32. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lazarovits G, Hill J, Patterson G, Conn KL, Crump NS. 2007. Edaphic soil levels of mineral nutrients, pH, organic matter, and cationic exchange capacity in the geocaulosphere associated with potato common scab. Phytopathology 97:1071–1082. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-97-9-1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lacey MJ, Wilson CR. 2001. Relationship of common scab incidence of potatoes grown in Tasmanian ferrosol soils with pH, exchangeable cations and other chemical properties of those soils. J Phytopathol 149:679–683. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0434.2001.00693.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Huang Y, Niu B, Gao Y, Fu L, Li W. 2010. CD-HIT suite: a Web server for clustering and comparing biological sequences. Bioinformatics 26:680–682. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES