Abstract
The subphylum Ustilaginomycotina (Basidiomycota, Fungi) comprises mainly plant pathogenic fungi (smuts). Some of the lineages possess cultivable unicellular stages that are usually classified as yeast or yeast-like species in a largely artificial taxonomic system which is independent from and largely incompatible with that of the smut fungi. Here we performed phylogenetic analyses based on seven genes including three nuclear ribosomal RNA genes and four protein coding genes to address the molecular phylogeny of the ustilaginomycetous yeast species and their filamentous counterparts. Taxonomic revisions were proposed to reflect this phylogeny and to implement the ‘One Fungus = One Name’ principle. The results confirmed that the yeast-containing classes Malasseziomycetes, Moniliellomycetes and Ustilaginomycetes are monophyletic, whereas Exobasidiomycetes in the current sense remains paraphyletic. Four new genera, namely Dirkmeia gen. nov., Kalmanozyma gen. nov., Golubevia gen. nov. and Robbauera gen. nov. are proposed to accommodate Pseudozyma and Tilletiopsis species that are distinct from the other smut taxa and belong to clades that are separate from those containing type species of the hitherto described genera. Accordingly, new orders Golubeviales ord. nov. with Golubeviaceae fam. nov. and Robbauerales ord. nov. with Robbaueraceae fam. nov. are proposed to accommodate the sisterhood of Golubevia gen. nov. and Robbauera gen. nov. with other orders of Exobasidiomycetes. The majority of the remaining anamorphic yeast species are transferred to corresponding teleomorphic genera based on strongly supported phylogenetic affinities, resulting in the proposal of 28 new combinations. The taxonomic status of a few Pseudozyma species remains to be determined because of their uncertain phylogenetic positions. We propose to use the term pro tempore or pro tem. in abbreviation to indicate the single-species lineages that are temporarily maintained.
Keywords: Fungi, Molecular phylogeny, Smuts, Taxonomy, Yeasts
Taxonomic novelties: New orders: Golubeviales Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout; Robbauerales Boekhout, Begerow, Q.M. Wang & F.Y. Bai
New families: Golubeviaceae Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow, & Boekhout; Robbaueraceae Boekhout, Begerow, Q.M. Wang & F.Y. Bai
New genera: Dirkmeia F.Y. Bai, Q.M. Wang, Begerow & Boekhout; Golubevia Q.M. Wang; F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout; Robbauera Boekhout, Begerow, Q.M. Wang & F.Y. Bai; Kalmanozyma Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout
New combinations: Anthracocystispampara (Speg.) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout; Dirkmeiachurashimaensis (T. Morita, Y. Ogura, M. Takash., N. Hirose, Fukuoka, Imura, Y. Kondo & Kitamoto) F.Y. Bai, Q.M. Wang, Begerow & Boekhout; Farysiaacheniorum (Buhagiar & Barnett) Begerow, Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout; F. itapuensis (Landell & Valente) Begerow, Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout; F. setubalensis (Fonseca & Inácio) Begerow, Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout; F. taiwaniana (P.-H. Wang, Y.-T. Wang & S.-H. Yang) Begerow, Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout; Gjaerumiaminor (Nyland) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout; G. penniseti (Takashima & Nakase) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout; Golubeviapallescens (Gokhale) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout; Kalmanozymabrasiliensis (J.V.C. Oliveira, T.A. Borges, R.A.C. Santos, L.F.D. Freitas, C.A. Rosa, G.H. Goldman & D.M. Riaño-Pachón) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout; K. fusiformata (Buhagiar) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout; K. vetiver (Chamnanpa & Limtong) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout; Langdoniajejuensis (Seo, Um, Min, Rhee, Cho, Kim & Lee) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout; Microstromaphylloplanum (R.G. Shivas & Rodr. Mir.) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout; Moesziomycesantarcticus (Goto, Sugiyama & Iizuka) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout; Mo. aphidis (Henninger & Windisch) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout; Mo. rugulosus (Traquair, L.A. Shaw & Jarvis) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout; Mo. parantarcticus (Sugita, Takashima, Mekha & Poonwan) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout; Phragmotaeniumderxii (Takashima & Nakase) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout; P. flavum (Tubaki) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout; P. fulvescens (Gokhale) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout; P. oryzicola (Takashima & Nakase) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout; Robbaueraalbescens (Gokhale) Boekhout, Begerow, Q.M. Wang & F.Y. Bai; Sporisoriumgraminicola (W. Golubev, Sugita & N. Golubev) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout; Triodiomycescrassus (Mekha, Takashima & Sugita) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout; Ustilagoabaconensis (Statzell, Scorzetti & Fell) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout; U. shanxiensis (F.Y. Bai & Q.M. Wang) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout; U. siamensis (Sugita, Takashima, Poonwan & Mekha) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout
Introduction
The subphylum Ustilaginomycotina (Basidiomycota, Fungi) comprises mainly plant pathogenic fungi usually known as smuts, which are mostly dimorphic and present a yeast stage during part of their life cycle (Bauer et al., 2001a, Begerow et al., 2014). As this yeast stage sometimes not only consists of unicellular budding cells, but also includes cultures that might eventually produce hyphae or divide in other modes than budding, these fungi are often summarised as yeasts or yeast-like fungi. For simplicity of reading we will refer to ‘yeasts’ only, as long a differentiation is not necessary. A considerable number of ustilaginomycetous fungi known from yeast states only are described as asexual yeast species that are currently classified into 12 genera with 71 species (Boekhout et al., 2011, Begerow et al., 2014, Nasr et al., 2014, Wang et al., 2014). These genera are Acaromyces, Farysizyma, Fereydounia, Jaminaea, Malassezia, Meira, Moniliella, Pseudozyma, Rhodotorula (pro parte), Sympodiomycopsis, Tilletiaria and Tilletiopsis (Stolk and Dakin, 1966, Gokhale, 1972, Boekhout, 1991, Boekhout, 1995, Boekhout et al., 1995, Boekhout et al., 2003, Boekhout et al., 2011, Begerow et al., 2000, Begerow et al., 2006, Inácio et al., 2008, Sipiczki and Kajdacsi, 2009, Nasr et al., 2014, Wang et al., 2014). Species of these 12 genera occur in four classes currently recognised in Ustilaginomycotina, namely Exobasidiomycetes, Malasseziomycetes, Moniliellomycetes and Ustilaginomycetes (Bauer et al. 2001a, Begerow et al., 2006, Begerow et al., 2014, Hibbett et al., 2007, Nasr et al., 2014, Wang et al., 2014). Many of ustilaginomycetous genera described from teleomorphic stages are cultivable, like members of Ustilago, Exobasidium and Microstroma, but their yeast stages have not been studied with respect to their physiological characteristics in depth as it is typically done for yeasts.
The genera Acaromyces and Meira contain probably mite-associated species, which are morphologically similar to Pseudozyma species, but phylogenetically belong to different lineages within Exobasidiomycetes (Boekhout et al., 2003, Boekhout et al., 2011, Rush and Aime, 2013). The genus Pseudozyma is a polyphyletic anamorphic genus with species occurring in various clusters together with teleomorphic species of Ustilago, Sporisorium and Moesziomyces in the Ustilaginaceae (Ustilaginales) (Begerow et al., 2000, Begerow et al., 2006, Begerow et al., 2014, Stoll et al., 2003, Stoll et al., 2005, Liou et al., 2009, McTaggart et al., 2012a, McTaggart et al., 2012b, Chamnanpa et al., 2013, Shivas et al., 2013, Oliveira et al., 2014). The genus Farysizyma is an anamorphic genus in the Anthracoideaceae (Ustilaginales) described by Inácio et al. (2008) that clusters with teleomorphic species of the genus Farysia containing dimorphic smut fungi. The genus Fereydounia represents the first yeast lineage within Urocystidales (Nasr et al. 2014). The genus Jaminaea represents a basal lineage in the Microstromatales (Exobasidiomycetes) based on ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequence analysis (Sipiczki & Kajdacsi 2009). Sympodiomycopsis is an anamorphic genus and its basidiomycetous affinity was discussed for a long time based on the ubiquinone system, type of cell wall and septal pore ultrastructure (Sugiyama et al. 1991). Sequence analyses of the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) and the large subunit rRNA (LSU rRNA) D1/D2 domains indicated that Sympodiomycopsis is a member of Exobasidiomycetes (Suh and Sugiyama, 1994, Fell et al., 2000). Tilletiaria is a teleomorphic genus characterised by the presence of teliospores and narrow hyphae without clamp connections (Bandoni & Johri 1972). This genus was tentatively placed in the Tilletiales (Boekhout et al. 1992), but was later proposed to represent the family Tilletiariaceae in the Georgefischerales (Exobasidiomycetes) based on molecular phylogenetic analyses and morphology of its basidium (Begerow et al., 2006, Boekhout et al., 2006, Hibbett et al., 2007, Boekhout et al., 2011). Tilletiopsis species occur in different orders of Exobasidiomycetes and this genus was often used as a ‘catch all’ genus for anamorphic members of Exobasidiomycetes (Begerow et al., 2000, Begerow et al., 2006, Begerow et al., 2014, Fell et al., 2000, Boekhout et al., 2011). Although most Rhodotorula species belong to Pucciniomycotina, four still occur in Ustilaginomycotina (Fell et al., 2000, Sampaio, 2011). In addition to Rhodotorula acheniorum which has been transferred to Farysizyma (Inácio et al. 2008), three other Rhodotorula species are located in the Microstromatales (Exobasidiomycetes) (Sampaio, 2004, Sampaio, 2011, Boekhout et al., 2011, Begerow et al., 2014). Recently, multiple gene sequence analyses showed that the genera Malassezia and Moniliella represent two deeply rooted lineages within Ustilaginomycotina and, subsequently, two classes Malasseziomycetes and Moniliellomycetes were proposed to accommodate them (Wang et al. 2014).
Based on several studies, it has been clear that many anamorphic yeast species are phylogenetically closely related with teleomorphic smut fungi and that some of the former represent a saprophytic stage of the latter (Begerow et al., 2000, Begerow et al., 2014, Boekhout et al., 2011). However, as is the case in other groups of Basidiomycota, ustilaginomycetous yeasts have been conventionally classified mainly based on physiological and biochemical criteria, resulting in a taxonomic system independent from, and largely incompatible with that of the smut fungi, which were classified mainly based on morphological characters and host range of the teleomorphic stage (Boekhout, 1991, Boekhout et al., 2011, Begerow et al., 2014). Additionally, although many species of smut fungi are cultivable only very few teleomorphic species are available as reference cultures. Integrated taxonomic revisions of Ustilaginomycotina unifying anamorphic and teleomorphic taxa have been made in recent years based on molecular data (Begerow et al., 2000, Begerow et al., 2006, Begerow et al., 2014, Bauer et al., 2001a, Weiß et al., 2004, Matheny et al., 2006, Boekhout et al., 2011). The process is, however, hampered by the lack of a robust and integrated phylogenetic analysis and by use of the dual nomenclature code for pleomorphic fungi. Recent studies have shown that the Exobasidiomycetes may not represent a monophyletic group (Begerow et al., 2006, Begerow et al., 2014, Hibbett et al., 2007, Boekhout et al., 2011, Wang et al., 2014) and a considerable number of currently recognised genera of both yeasts and dimorphic smut fungi in Ustilaginomycotina are polyphyletic (Begerow et al., 2000, Begerow et al., 2014, Boekhout et al., 2011, McTaggart et al., 2012a, McTaggart et al., 2012b). The fine phylogenetic relationships between the yeast and filamentous taxa remain to be resolved. Here we used phylogenetic analyses of seven genes to address the phylogenetic relationships of ustilaginomycetous yeast species with each other and with their filamentous counterparts. Consequently, taxonomic revisions for the majority of the ustilaginomycetous yeasts employed were proposed according to the ‘One Fungus = One Name’ principle (Hawksworth, 2011, Taylor, 2011, McNeill et al., 2012).
Materials and methods
Taxon sampling
All ustilaginomycetous yeast species listed in the 5th edition of The Yeasts, A Taxonomic Study (Kurtzman et al. 2011) were employed (Table 1, Table 2). The yeast and smut culture strains used came from the CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre (CBS-KNAW), Utrecht, Netherlands; the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC), Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; and Ruhr-Universität Bochum, AG Geobotanik, Germany.
Table 1.
Taxa and sequence accession numbers employed in the combined seven genes sequence analysis (those in bold are determined in this study).
Cultures and herbarium specimen are available from the respective collections (CBS, Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures; CGMCC, the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center; CMW, DB, DSM, and FB, Dominik Begerow, Ruhr-Universität Bochum; F, Herbarium Franz Oberwinkler; HAJB, Herbarium Havanna Jardín botánico; HMK, Herbarium Martin Kemler; HRK, Herbarium Ronny Kellner; HUV, Herbarium Ustilaginales Vánky; JAG, Herbarium J.A. Gossmann; JCM: the Japan Collection of Microorganisms (JCM); KVU: Kálmán Vánky Ustilaginales; LMC: Herbarium L. M. Carris; MP, Herbarium Meike Piepenbring; RK, strain collection Ronny Kellner; UMa, Marco Thines).
Table 2.
Overview of the classification of the ustilaginomycetous yeasts and related fungi in the Ustilaginomycotina. Only the species compared in this study are included. For the details on the taxonomy of teliomorphs see Vanky (2012) and Begerow et al. (2014). Type species of genera, genera, families, orders and classes are in bold.
| Species | Basionym or important synonym | Strain/Herbarium number | D1/D2 | ITS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exobasidiomycetes | ||||
| Doassansiales | ||||
| Rhamphosporaceae | ||||
| Rhamphospora | ||||
| Rhamphospora nymphaeae | CBS 72.38 | DQ831032 | DQ831034 | |
| Entylomatales | ||||
| Entylomataceae | ||||
| Entyloma | ||||
| E. arnoseridis | CBS 203.36 | DQ645528 | DQ911609 | |
| E. calendulae | Protomyces calendulae | CBS 746.85 | DQ663687 | DQ663689 |
| E. ficariae | CBS 480.91 | AJ235295 | JQ586199 | |
| Tilletiopsis1 | ||||
| T. cremea1 | CBS 605.83T | AJ235279 | AB025690 | |
| T. lilacina1 | CBS 435.92T | KP322984 | KP322984 | |
| T. washingtonensis1 | CBS 544.50T | AJ235278 | DQ835994 | |
| Exobasidiales | ||||
| Brachybasidiaceae | ||||
| Meira1 | ||||
| M. argovae1 | CBS 110053T | AY158669 | AY158675 | |
| M. geulakonigii1 | CBS 110052T | AY158668 | AY158674 | |
| M. miltonrushii1 | MCA 3882T | JX432962 | JX432962 | |
| M. nashicola1 | CBS 117161T | AB185157 | AB185159 | |
| Cryptobasidiaceae | ||||
| Acaromyces1 | ||||
| A. ingoldii1 | CBS 110050T | AY158665 | AY158671 | |
| Laurobasidium | ||||
| L. lauri | Exobasidium lauri | MAFF238665 | AB177562 | AB180359 |
| Exobasidiaceae | ||||
| Exobasidium | ||||
| E. gracile | Exobasidium camelliae var. gracile | DSM4460 | DQ663699 | DQ663700 |
| E. rhododendri | Exobasidium vaccinii var. rhododendri | CBS 101457 | DQ667151 | DQ667153 |
| E. vaccinii | TUB019109 | FJ644526 | AB180362 | |
| DB160d | KP322983 | KP322983 | ||
| Georgefischeriales | ||||
| Gjaerumiaceae | ||||
| Gjaerumia | ||||
| G. penniseti comb. nov.1 | Tilletiopsis penniseti1 | CBS 110032T | AB052825 | — |
| G. minor comb. nov.1 | Tilletiopsis minor1 | CBS 543.50T | AJ235287 | KP322989 |
| Tilletiariaceae | ||||
| Phragmotaenium | ||||
| P. derxii comb. nov.1 | Tilletiopsis derxii1 | CBS 110078T | AB052823 | AB045707 |
| P. flavum comb. nov.1 | Tilletiopsis flava1 | CBS 401.84T | AJ235285 | KP322987 |
| P. fulvescens comb. nov.1 | Tilletiopsis fulvescens1 | CBS 607.83T | AJ235282 | KP322988 |
| P. oryzicola comb. nov.1 | Tilletiopsis oryzicola1 | CBS 110079T | AB052825 | AB045708 |
| Tilletiaria1 | ||||
| Tilletiaria anomala1 | CBS 436.72T | AJ235284 | DQ234558 | |
| Golubeviales ord. nov.1 | ||||
| Golubeviaceae fam. nov.1 | ||||
| Golubevia gen. nov.1 | ||||
| G. pallescens comb. nov.1 | Tilletiopsis pallescens1 | CBS 111626 | AY879271 | AY879278 |
| CBS 364.85T | AJ235292 | DQ317636 | ||
| Microstromatales | ||||
| Microstromataceae | ||||
| Microstroma | ||||
| M. albiziae | CMW 36935 | KP322982 | KP322982 | |
| M. album | Fusisporium album | RB2072 | AF352052 | DQ317624 |
| Rhodotorula bacarum | CGMCC 2.3190T | AF190002 | DQ317629 | |
| Torulopsis bacarum | ||||
| M. phylloplanum comb. nov.1 | Cryptococcus phylloplanus1 | JCM 9035T | AF190004 | AB038131 |
| Rhodotorula phylloplana1 | ||||
| Cryptococcus hinnuleus1 | JCM 9030T | AF190003 | AB038130 | |
| Rhodotorula hinnulea1 | ||||
| M. juglandis | Fusidium juglandis | CBS 287.63 | AF009867 | DQ789988 |
| Volvocisporiaceae | ||||
| Volvocisporium | ||||
| V. triumfetticola | Muribasidiospora triumfetticola | RB2070 | AF352053 | DQ317637 |
| Quambalariaceae | ||||
| Quambalaria | ||||
| Q. cyanescens | Sporothrix cyanescens | CBS 876.73 | DQ317616 | DQ317623 |
| Microstromatales incertae sedis | ||||
| Jaminaea1 | ||||
| J. angkorensis1 | CBS 10918T | EU587489 | EU604147 | |
| J. lanaiensis1 | Sympodiomycopsis lanaiensis1 | CBS 11676T | GU047881 | GQ465043 |
| Sympodiomycopsis1 | ||||
| S. kandeliae1 | CBS 10858T | DQ990016 | DQ990017 | |
| S. paphiopedili1 | AS 2.1398T | AF352054 | DQ317631 | |
| Robbauerales ord. nov.1 | ||||
| Robbaueraceae fam. nov.1 | ||||
| Robbauera gen. nov.1 | ||||
| R. albescens comb. nov.1 | Tilletiopsis albescens1 | CBS 608.83T | AJ235289 | KP322986 |
| Tilletiales | ||||
| Tilletiaceae | ||||
| Erratomyces | ||||
| E. patelii | Protomycopsis patelii | CBS 669.70 | DQ094784 | DQ846894 |
| Tilletia | ||||
| T. caries | Uredo caries | CBS 160.85 | AJ235307 | AY496450 |
| T. controversa | Tilletia controversa | MP2525 | DQ832244 | DQ832246 |
| T. goloskokovii | LMC321 | AY818998 | DQ832248 | |
| T. iowensis | Neovossia iowensis | BPI863664 | AY818988 | DQ832253 |
| Ustilaginomycetes | ||||
| Urocystales | ||||
| Doassansiopsaceae | ||||
| Doassansiopsis | ||||
| D. limnocharidis | Doassansia limnocharidis | HUV15198 | AF009850 | DQ875344 |
| Fereydouniaceae1 | ||||
| Fereydounia1 | ||||
| F. khargensis1 | IBRCM30116T | KJ490642 | KJ490641 | |
| Glomosporiaceae | ||||
| Thecaphora | ||||
| T. spilanthis | JAG53 | DQ832241 | DQ832243 | |
| Urocystaceae | ||||
| Melanoxa | ||||
| M. oxalidiellae | TUB 015007 | EF635905 | EF635906 | |
| M. oxalidis | Melanotaenium oxalidis | HUV1436 | EF635908 | EF635907 |
| Mundkurella | ||||
| M. kalopanacis | HUV16732 | AF009869 | DQ875351 | |
| Urocystis | ||||
| U. colchici | Caeoma colchici | CBS 283.28 | DQ838576 | DQ839596 |
| U. eranthidis | Urocystis pompholygodes f. eranthidis | hmk292 | JN367324 | JN367299 |
| Ustacystis | ||||
| U. waldsteiniae | Urocystis waldsteiniae | FO38439 | AF009880 | DQ875356 |
| Vankya | ||||
| V. heufleri | Ustilago heufleri | HUV15007 | EF653981 | EF667965 |
| V. ornithogali | Uredo ornithogali | TUB015993 | EF210712 | EF635910 |
| Ustilaginales | ||||
| Anthracoideaceae | ||||
| Cintractia | ||||
| C. amazonica | MP200 | AJ236142 | DQ875342 | |
| C. axicola | Ustilago axicola Berk. | MP3490 | DQ631906 | DQ631908 |
| C. limitata | Cintractia limitata | HAJB10488 | DQ645506 | DQ645508 |
| Dermatosorus | ||||
| D. cyperi | HUV15991 | AJ236157 | DQ875343 | |
| Farysia | ||||
| F. acheniorum comb. nov.1 | Farysizyma acheniorum1 | AS 2.3198T | AF190001 | AB038128 |
| Rhodotorula acheniorum1, Sterigmatomyces acheniorum1 | ||||
| F. chardoniana | MP2062 | AF009859 | AY344968 | |
| F. itapuensis comb. nov.1 | Farysizyma itapuensis1 | CBS 10428T | DQ767831 | DQ767831 |
| F. setubalensis comb. nov.1 | Farysizyma setubalensis1 | CBS 10241T | EU002857 | EU002888 |
| F. taiwaniana comb. nov.1 | Farysizyma taiwniana1 | CBS 9927T | AY551270 | AY555071 |
| Leucocintractia | ||||
| L. leucodermoides | MS482 | DQ875363 | DQ875346 | |
| L. scleriae | Uredo scleriae | MP2074 | AJ236154 | AY740025 |
| Moreaua | ||||
| M. bulbostylidis | 56581 (M) | DQ875366 | DQ875349 | |
| M. fimbristylidis | 56582 (M) | DQ875367 | DQ875350 | |
| Schizonella | ||||
| S. melanogramma | Uredo melanogramma | FO37174 | AF009870 | DQ191252 |
| Stegocintractia | ||||
| S. luzulae | Ustilago luzulae | MP2340 | AJ236148 | DQ875353 |
| Tolyposporium | ||||
| T. isolepidis | Schizonella isolepidis | HUV14720 | EU246949 | EU246950 |
| T. neillii | Sorosporium neillii | HUV18533 | EU246952 | EU246951 |
| T. junci | Sorosporium junci | HUV17168 | AF009876 | AY344994 |
| Ustanciosporium | ||||
| U. gigantosporum | Cintractia gigantospora | HRK023 | JN367325 | JN367300 |
| U. standleyanum | Cintractia standleyana | JAG73 | DQ846888 | DQ846890 |
| Melanotaeniaceae | ||||
| Melanotaenium | ||||
| M. cingens | Ustilago cingens | L.E.Kari191(M) | DQ875364 | DQ875347 |
| M. endogenum | Protomyces endogenus | CBS 481.91 | DQ789979 | DQ789981 |
| M. euphorbiae | Tilletia euphorbiae | HUV17733 | JN367314 | JN367289 |
| Ustilaginaceae | ||||
| Anomalomyces | ||||
| A. panici | BRIP46421 | DQ459347 | DQ459348 | |
| A. yakirrae | HUV 21918 | KC184906 | KC184907 | |
| Anthracocystis | ||||
| A. anthracoideispora | Sporisorium anthracoideisporum | HUV18350 | JN367315 | JN367290 |
| A. apludae | Sorosporium apludae | KVU967 | JN367319 | JN367294 |
| A. apludae-aristatae | Sorosporium apludae-aristatae | MS287 | AY740098 | AY740045 |
| A. cenchri | Ustilago cenchri | MP1974 | AF453943 | AY344972 |
| A. cenchri-elymoidis | Sporisorium cenchri-elymoidis | BRIP 26491 | HQ013122 | HQ013094 |
| A. chrysopogonis | Sporisorium chrysopogonis | MS135 | AY740131 | AY344973 |
| A. destruens | Ust.exs.472 (M) | AY747077 | AY344976 | |
| A. elionuri | Ustilago elionuri | MP2601 (LPB) | AY740157 | AY740157 |
| A. fascicularis | MS198 | AY740088 | AY740035 | |
| A. formosana | Ustilago formosana | Ust. Exs. 688 (M) | AY740134 | AY344979 |
| A. flocculosa1 | Pseudozyma flocculosa1 | CBS 167.88T | AJ235299 | AF294690 |
| Sporothrix flocculosa1 | ||||
| A. heteropogonicola | Sorosporium heteropogonicola | BRIP51822 | HQ013135 | HQ013101 |
| A. hwangensis | Sporisorium hwangense | MS267 | AY740104 | AY740051 |
| A. loudetiae-pedicellatae | Sporisorium loudetiae-pedicellatae | MS252 | AY740106 | AY740053 |
| A. ovaria | Sorosporium ovarium | MP1871 | AJ236137 | AY740020 |
| A. pampara comb. nov. | Ustilago pamparum | JCM 2007 | KP322980 | KP322980 |
| A. polliniae | Sorosporium polliniae | MS32 | AY740138 | AY344987 |
| A. provincialis | Sorosporium ellisii var. provinciale | Ust.exs.759 (M) | AY747076 | AY344988 |
| A. pseudanthistiriae | Sorosporium pseudanthistiriae | KVU969 | JN367320 | JN367295 |
| A. themedae-arguentis | Sporisorium themedae-arguentis | Ust. Exs. 855 | AY740140 | AY344991 |
| A. tumefaciens | Sorosporium tumefaciens | MS139 | AY740128 | AY344969 |
| A. walkeri | Sporisorium walkeri | KVU975 | JN367322 | JN367297 |
| Dirkmeia gen. nov.1 | ||||
| D. churashimaensis comb. nov.1 | Pseudozyma churashimaensis1 | OK96T | AB548955 | AB548947 |
| Kalmanozyma gen. nov.1 | ||||
| K. fusiformata comb. nov.1 | Pseudozyma fusiformata1 | CBS 6951T | AB089367 | AB089366 |
| K. brasiliensis comb. nov.1 | Pseudozyma brasiliensis1 | GHG001T | KF737866 | KF737866 |
| K. vetiver comb. nov.1 | Pseudozyma vetiver1 | DMKU-LV99T | AB809649 | AB809652 |
| Langdonia | ||||
| L. aristidae | Ustilago aristidae | HUV19145 | JN367317 | JN367292 |
| L. confusa | Sorosporium confusum | BRIP42670 | HQ013132 | HQ013095 |
| L. jejuensis comb. nov.1 | Pseudozyma jejuensis1 | CBS 10454T | FN428865 | EF079966 |
| Macalpinomyces | ||||
| M. eragrostiellae | Ust.Exs.960(M) | AY740089 | AY740036 | |
| M. eriachnes | Sorosporium eriachnes | CBS 131454 | JN367312 | JN367287 |
| M. loudetiae | Sorosporium loudetiae | MS250 | AY740151 | AY740151 |
| M. mackinlayi | BRIP52549 | HQ013131 | GU014817 | |
| M. neglectus | Ustilago neglecta | RB2056 (TUB) | AY740109 | AY740056 |
| M. spermophorus | F565 | AY740171 | AY740171 | |
| M. trichopterygis | MS248 | AY740092 | AY740039 | |
| M. tristachyae | MS15 | AY740164 | AY740164 | |
| M. viridans | BRIP 49133 | HQ013125 | HQ013089 | |
| Melanopsichium | ||||
| M. pennsylvanicum | Melanopsichium pennsylvanicum | HUV17548 (TUB) | AY740093 | AY740040 |
| Moesziomyces | ||||
| M. antarcticus comb. nov.1 | Candida antarctica1 | CBS 5955 | AJ235302 | AB089358 |
| Pseudozyma antarctica1 | JCM 10317T | JN940521 | JN942668 | |
| Trichosporon oryzae1 | ||||
| Vanrija antarctica1 | ||||
| M. aphidis comb. nov.1 | Pseudozyma aphidis1 | JCM 10318 | JN940519 | JN942666 |
| CBS 517.83T | AB089363 | AF294699 | ||
| M. bullatus | Sorosporium bullatum | CBS 425.34 | DQ831011 | DQ831013 |
| M. parantarcticus comb. nov.1 | Pseudozyma parantarctica1 | CBS 10005T | AB089357 | AB089356 |
| M. rugulosus comb. nov.1 | Pseudozyma rugulosa1 | CBS 170.88T | JN940523 | JN942670 |
| Sporisorium | ||||
| S. aegypticum | Ustilago aegyptiaca | Ust.Exs.756(M) | AY740129 | AY344970 |
| S. andropogonis | Uredo andropogonis | MS283 | AY740095 | AY740042 |
| S. arthraxonis | Ustilago arthraxonis | MS338 | AY740099 | AY740046 |
| S. cordobense | Ustilago cordobensis | MS159 | AY740155 | AY740155 |
| S. cruentum | Ustilago cruenta | MS14 | AY740156 | AY740156 |
| S. culmiperdum | Ustilago culmiperda | MP2060 | AF133580 | AY344975 |
| S. dimeriae-ornithopodae | Ust.exs. 472 | AY740132 | AY344977 | |
| S. erythraeense | Ustilago erythraeensis | Ust.Exs.849 (M) | AY740102 | AY740049 |
| S. exsertum | Cintractia exserta | KVU965 | JN367318 | JN367293 |
| S. fastigiatum | MP1976 | AY740133 | AY344978 | |
| S. foveolati | Sphacelotheca foveolati | MS21 | AY740103 | AY740050 |
| S. graminicola comb. nov.1 | Pseudozyma graminicola1 | LI20T | AB180728 | AB180728 |
| S. holwayi | Sphacelotheca holwayi | MP1271 | AF453941 | AY344980 |
| S. lacrymae-jobi | Ustilago lachrymae-jobi | M56611 | AY740105 | AY740052 |
| S. lepturi | Ustilago carbo var. lepturi | Ust.exs.966 (M) | AY740135 | AY344981 |
| S. manilense | Ustilago manilensis | Ust.Exs.854 (M) | AY740112 | AY740059 |
| S. modestum | Ustilago modesta | MS237 | AY740107 | AY740054 |
| S. moniliferum | Ustilago monilifera | MS 98 | AF453940 | AY344984 |
| S. nervosum | MS241 | AY740110 | AY740057 | |
| S. occidentale | Sphacelotheca occidentalis | Ust.exs.758 (M) | AY740137 | AY344985 |
| S. ophiuri | Ustilago ophiuri | HB20 | AJ236136 | AY740019 |
| S. pseudechinolaenae | Ust.exs.853 (M) | AY740139 | AY344989 | |
| S. puellare | Ustilago puellaris | MP2372 | AY740111 | AY740058 |
| S. reilianum | Ustilago reiliana | Ust.exs. 527 | AY740163 | AY740163 |
| S. scitamineum | Ustilago scitaminea | MP541 | AY740147 | AY740070 |
| S. sorghi | MP2036a | AF009872 | AY740021 | |
| S. trachypogonicola | MP2463 (HAJB) | AY740141 | AY344992 | |
| S. trachypogonis-splumosi | MS281 | AY740113 | AY740060 | |
| S. veracruzianum | Sphacelotheca veracruziana | MP960 | AY740114 | AY344993 |
| S. vermiculum | BRIP49748 | HQ013134 | HQ013114 | |
| S. wynaadense | Ustilago wynaadensis | BRIP27640 | HQ013124 | HQ013116 |
| Stollia | ||||
| S. bursa | Ustilago bursa | KVU844 | JN367316 | JN367291 |
| S. ewartii | Ustilago ewartii | BRIP51818 | HQ013127 | HQ013087 |
| Tranzscheliella | ||||
| T. hypodytes | Caeoma hypodytes | MS342 | DQ191256 | DQ191250 |
| T. williamsii | Sorosporium williamsii | CBS 131475 | JN367338 | JN367310 |
| Triodiomyces | ||||
| T. altilis | Ustilago altilis | BRIP52543 | HQ013136 | AY740166 |
| T. crassus comb. nov.1 | Pseudozyma crassa | DMST17136T | AB117962 | AB117962 |
| T. triodiae | Ustilago triodiae | HUV17662 | AY740126 | AY740074 |
| Tubisorus | ||||
| T. pachycarpus | Sorosporium pachycarpum | HUV 21891 | JN871718 | JN871717 |
| Ustilago | ||||
| U. abaconensis comb. nov.1 | Pseudozyma abaconensis1 | CBS 8380T | FJ008047 | FJ008053 |
| U. affinis | MP692 | AF133581 | AY344995 | |
| U. austro-africana | MS316 | AY740115 | AY740061 | |
| U. avenae | Uredo segetum var. avenae | DB559 | AY740117 | AY740063 |
| U. bromivora | Ustilago carbo d bromivora | MS175 | AY740118 | AY740064 |
| U. bullata | MP2363 | AF453935 | AY344998 | |
| U. bouriquetii | MS315 | — | AY740167 | |
| U. calamagrostidis | Tilletia calamagrostidis | MS314 | AY740119 | AY740065 |
| U. crameri | MS72 | AY740143 | AY344999 | |
| U. cynodontis | Ustilago carbo ß cynodontis | MS199 | AY740168 | AY740168 |
| U. davisii | HUV19252 | AY740169 | AY740169 | |
| U. echinata | MS132 | AY740144 | AY345001 | |
| U. esculenta | Ust.exs. 540 | AF453937 | AY345002 | |
| U. filiformis | Lycoperdon filiforme | RB3011 | AY740120 | AY740066 |
| U. hordei | Uredo segetum a hordei | Ust.exs. 784 | AF453934 | AY345003 |
| U. hordei | CBS 131470 | KF706429 | KF706437 | |
| U. ixophori | MP2194 (USJ) | AY740121 | AY740067 | |
| U. maydis | Mycosarcoma maydis | CBS 504.76 | AF453938 | AY854090 |
| U. maydis | FB1 | KP866233 | KP866233 | |
| U. maydis | Pseudozyma prolifica1 | CBS 319.87T | AJ235298 | AF294700 |
| U. nuda | Ustilago segetum var. nuda | HUV17782 | JN367334 | JN367307 |
| U. pamirica | Ust.exs.789 (M) | AY740145 | AY345005 | |
| U. shanxiensis comb. nov.1 | Pseudozyma shanxiensis1 | AS 2.2523T | DQ008955 | DQ008956 |
| U. schmidtiae | BRIP 51848 | HQ013129 | HQ013121 | |
| U. schroeteriana | Ust.exs.887 (M) | AY740146 | AY345006 | |
| U. siamensis comb. nov.1 | Pseudozyma siamensis1 | DMST17137T | AB117963 | AB117963 |
| U. sparsa | KVU892 | JN367335 | JN367308 | |
| U. striiformis | HUV18286 | DQ875375 | AY740172 | |
| U. syntherismae | Caeoma syntherismae | Ust.Exs.998 (M) | AY740123 | AY740071 |
| U. tragana | MS320 | AY740124 | AY740072 | |
| U. trichophora | Caeoma trichophorum | MS339 | AY740125 | AY740073 |
| U. tritici | Uredo segetum ß tritici | CBS 669.70 | DQ094784 | DQ846894 |
| U. vetiveriae | HUV17954 | JN367337 | AY345011 | |
| U. xerochloae | Ust.exs.1000 (M) | AY740150 | AY345012 | |
| Species remain to be reclassified | ||||
| Pseudozyma alboarmeniaca pro tem.1 | DMST17135T | AB117961 | AB117961 | |
| P. hubeiensis pro tem.1 | AS 2.2493T | DQ008953 | DQ008954 | |
| P. pruni pro tem.1 | CBS 10937T | EU379943 | EU379942 | |
| P. thailandica pro tem.1 | CBS 10006T | AB089355 | AB089354 | |
| P. tsukubaensis pro tem.1 | JCM 10324T | AB089373 | AB089372 | |
| Websdaneaceae | ||||
| Websdanea | ||||
| W. lyginiae | Ustilago lyginiae | HUV 17900 | AJ236159 | DQ875357 |
| Malasseziomycetes1 | ||||
| Malasseziales1 | ||||
| Malasseziaceae1 | ||||
| Malassezia1 | ||||
| M. caprae1 | CBS 10434T | AY743616 | AY743656 | |
| M. cuniculi1 | CBS 11721T | GU733708 | GU733709 | |
| M. dermatis1 | CBS 9169T | AB070365 | AY390284 | |
| M. equina1 | CBS 9969T | AY743621 | KF706439 | |
| M. furfur1 | Microsporum furfur1 | CBS 1878NT | AF063214 | AY743634 |
| M. globosa1 | CBS 7966T | AF064025 | AY387132 | |
| M. japonica1 | CBS 9431T | EF140672 | EF140669 | |
| M. nana1 | CBS 9558 | EF140673 | EF140667 | |
| M. obtusa1 | CBS 7876T | AB105197 | AY387137 | |
| M. pachydermatis1 | Pityrosporum pachydermatis1 | CBS 1879T | AY743605 | AB118941 |
| M. restricta1 | CBS 7877NT | AF064026 | AY743636 | |
| M. slooffiae1 | CBS 7956T | AJ249956 | AY743633 | |
| M. sympodialis1 | CBS 7222T | AF064024 | AY743632 | |
| M. yamatoensis1 | CBS 9725T | AB125263 | AB125261 | |
| Moniliellomycetes1 | ||||
| Moniliellales1 | ||||
| Moniliellaceae1 | ||||
| Moniliella1 | ||||
| M. acetoabutens1 | CBS 169.66T | AF335523 | EU252153 | |
| M. byzovii1 | TBY 2041.7 | KC213817 | KC213818 | |
| M. carnis1 | KFP 246 | JQ814873 | — | |
| M. dehoogii1 | KFP 211 | JQ814874 | — | |
| M. fonsecae1 | ST-26 | DQ400366 | — | |
| M. madida1 | Trichosporonoides madida1 | CBS 240.79T | AF335522 | — |
| M. megachiliensis1 | Trichosporonoides megachiliensis1 | CBS 190.92T | EF137916 | KF706433 |
| M. mellis1 | Zygosaccharomyces mellis1 | CBS 350.33T | EU545185 | — |
| M. nigrescens1 | Trichosporonoides nigrescens1 | CBS 269.81T | AF335527 | KF706436 |
| M. oedocephali1 | Trichosporonoides oedocephalis1 | CBS 649.66T | AF335521 | KF706435 |
| M. pollinis1 | Moniliella tomentosa var. pollinis1 | CBS 461.67T | AF335525 | KF706434 |
| M. spathulata1 | Trichosporonoides spathulata1 | CBS 241.79T | AF335526 | KF706432 |
| M. suaveolens1 | Sachsia suaveolens1 | CBS 126.42T | AF335520 | KF706431 |
Yeast species.
PCR and DNA sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from cultures grown on yeast extract peptone dextrose (YPD) plates using the method described by Bolano et al. (2001). Seven loci were selected, including four protein-coding genes, namely the two RNA polymerase II subunits (RPB1 and RPB2), the translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF1) and the mitochondrial cytochrome b (CYTB); and three rRNA gene regions, namely the small subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA (SSU or 18S rRNA), the D1/D2 domains of the large subunit (LSU or 26S rRNA) and the ITS 1+2 regions (including 5.8S rRNA). PCR and sequencing of the three rRNA gene regions and three protein genes, RPB1, RPB2 and TEF1, were performed as described in Wang et al. (2014). PCR and sequencing of the CYTB gene were performed according to Wang & Bai (2008). Cycle sequencing was performed using the ABI BigDye cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster, California). Electrophoresis was done using an ABI PRISM 3730 DNA sequencer.
Molecular phylogenetic analyses
Five data sets consisting of the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene, the combined ITS (including 5.8S rRNA gene) and D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene, the combined three rRNA regions, the combined four protein coding genes, and the combined seven genes, respectively, were constructed. Introns were deleted from all sequences before the alignment performed. Sequences of those data sets were aligned with the MAFFT program (Standley 2013). The alignments of different genes were concatenated in the respective analyses. The alignment data sets were firstly analysed with Modeltest version 3.04 (Posada & Crandall 1998) using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to find the most appropriate model of DNA substitution. A general time-reversible model of DNA substitution additionally assuming a percentage of invariable sites and Γ-distributed substitution rates at the remaining sites (GTR + I + G) was selected for further analyses. Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was conducted in RAxML-HPC2 7.2.8 (Stamatakis 2006) using 1 000 bootstrap replicates analysis. Maximum parsimony (MP) analysis was conducted using PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford 2002) and the support of the branching topologies was derived from 1 000 replicates with 10 random additions. Bayesian inference (BI) analysis was conducted in MrBayes 3.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012) with parameters set to 5 000 000 generations, two runs and four chains. The chains were heated to 0.25 and a stop value of 0.01 was used. Sequences from several species of Puccinionycotina were used as outgroups in the seven genes-based phylogenetic reconstructions.
Results and discussion
Based on the sequences determined in this study and those retrieved from GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank) two datasets comprising concatenated sequences of the seven genes and of the four protein-coding genes solely were constructed for the analysis of the phylogeny of yeast and representative teleomorphic taxa and to visually examine the topological concordance of the trees generated using different algorithms. In order to further examine the fine phylogenetic relationships of yeast species with teleomorphic taxa, a dataset consisting of the combined ITS (including 5.8S rRNA gene) and LSU rRNA gene sequences and a dataset consisting of only LSU rRNA gene sequences were constructed and analysed.
The analysis of the combined seven genes, the combined ITS and LSU rRNA genes and the four protein genes (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3) confirmed that Malasseziomycetes and Moniliellomycetes containing only yeast species are monophyletic deep lineages as shown in Wang et al. (2014). Ustilaginomycetes is also monophyletic, whereas Exobasidiomycetes is polyphyletic (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3). The phylogenies of the latter two classes containing a mixture of yeast species and teleomorphic taxa are discussed below in detail.
Fig. 1.
Phylogenetic tree constructed using maximum likelihood analysis from combined sequences of the SSU rRNA gene, LSU rRNA D1/D2 domains, ITS1+2 regions (including 5.8S rRNA gene), RPB1, RPB2, TEF1 and CYTB depicting the phylogenetic placements of yeast genera within Ustilaginomycotina. Branch lengths are scaled in terms of expected numbers of nucleotide substitutions per site. Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) and bootstrap percentages (BP) from 1 000 replicates of maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony analyses are shown respectively from left to right on the deep and major branches resolved. Taxa in bold are yeast and yeast-like fungi. Note: nm, not monophyletic; ns, not supported (PP < 0.9 or BP < 50 %).
Fig. 2.
Phylogenetic tree constructed using maximum likelihood analysis from the combined sequences of the LSU rRNA D1/D2 domains and ITS1+2 regions (including 5.8S rRNA gene) depicting the phylogenetic relationships of yeast taxa with teleomorphic taxa within Ustilaginomycotina. Branch lengths are scaled in terms of expected numbers of nucleotide substitutions per site. Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) and bootstrap percentages (BP) from 1 000 replicates of maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony analyses are shown respectively from left to right on the deep and major branches resolved. A. The outline of the tree showing the phylogenetic relationships of the genera or clades within Ustilaginomycotina. B. A part of the tree showing the phylogenetic relationships of a part of taxa within the Ustilaginales. C. A part of the tree showing the phylogenetic relationships of another part the taxa within the Ustilaginales and the taxa in the Urocystales. D. A part of the tree showing the phylogenetic relationships of the taxa within Exobasidiomycetes. Taxa in bold are yeast and yeast-like fungi. Notes: nm, not monophyletic; ns, not supported (PP < 0.9 or BP < 50 %).
Fig. 3.
Phylogenetic tree constructed from maximum likelihood analysis based on the combined sequences of protein-coding genes including RPB1, RPB2, TEF1 and CYTB, showing the phylogenetic relationships of yeast genera within Ustilaginomycotina. Branch lengths are scaled in terms of expected numbers of nucleotide substitutions per site. Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) and bootstrap percentages (BP) from 1 000 replicates of maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony analyses are shown respectively from left to right on the deep and major branches resolved. Taxa in bold are yeast and yeast-like fungi. Note: nm, not monophyletic; ns, not supported (PP < 0.9 or BP < 50 %).
Ustilaginomycetes
Two orders Ustilaginales and Urocystales were recognised in this class (Boekhout et al., 2011, Begerow et al., 2014). They were resolved as monophyletic groups in the trees constructed from all the datasets analysed in this study with strong bootstrap (BP) and posterior probability (PP) support values (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3). The yeasts classified in the anamorphic genera Farysizyma and Pseudozyma (Inácio et al., 2008, Boekhout et al., 2011) were located within Ustilaginales and those in the genus Fereydounia occurred within Urocystidales as shown in Nasr et al. (2014). In the tree based on the ITS and LSU dataset Fereydounia occurred in a separated lineage distinct from the other genera in the Urocystidales (Fig. 2C), which is in agreement with Nasr et al. (2014). The Farysizyma species formed a monophyletic clade in the trees drawn from the seven gene and the four protein gene datasets (Fig. 1, Fig. 3) and clustered together with Farysia chardoniana in the tree based on the ITS and LSU dataset (Fig. 2C) as shown in Inácio et al. (2008). This clade was closely related with Schizonella and Stegocintractia species (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3) within Anthracoideaceae (Begerow et al. 2014). The genus Farysia, with the type species of F. javanica, proposed by Raciborski (1909) contained 21 species that are parasites on Cyperaceae (Begerow et al. 2014). The morphological characters are unique and at present there are no hints for a polyphyletic nature of Farysia. Therefore, we consider Farysizyma species representing anamorphic stages of the genus Farysia.
The Pseudozyma species were located mainly in various clades together with teleomorphic species from the so called Ustilago-Sporisorium-Macalpinomyces complex (McTaggart et al., 2012a, McTaggart et al., 2012b) in the trees made from the seven gene and the four protein gene datasets (Fig. 1, Fig. 3), being in agreement with previous studies based on rRNA gene sequence analysis (Boekhout et al. 2011). The three teleomorphic genera were also found to be polyphyletic (Stoll et al., 2003, Stoll et al., 2005). McTaggart et al. (2012a) recently reconstructed the phylogeny of the complex using four nuclear loci including ITS, LSU rRNA gene, GAPDH and TEF1 and defined eight groups, Clade 1 to Clade 8. Each of the clades was also characterised by host specificity and soral synapomorphies (McTaggart et al. 2012a). Consequently, the authors re-classified the complex by emending the genera Sporisorium (Clade 1) and Anthracocystis (Clade 4), and proposed three new genera, Langdonia (Clade 8), Stollia (Clade 3) and Triodiomyces (Clade 5) to reflect morphological synapomorphies (McTaggart et al. 2012b).
The fine phylogenetic relationships of the Pseudozyma species with the teleomorphic taxa in the Ustilaginales are shown in the tree constructed from the ITS and LSU dataset which contained the species employed in McTaggart et al., 2012a, McTaggart et al., 2012b and other smut fungi (Fig. 2). Sporisorium (Clade 1), Stollia (Clade 3), Anthrococystis (Clade 4), Triodiomyces (Clade 5), Langdonia (Clade 8) and Clade 7 were resolved as well supported monophyletic clades here, being in agreement with McTaggart et al., 2012a, McTaggart et al., 2012b. However, Clade 2 and Clade 6 as defined by McTaggart et al. (2012a) were shown to be polyphyletic in this study (Fig. 2A). Species from Clade 2 were located in two different subgroups and those from Clade 6 in three subgroups (Fig. 2A). The phylogenetic relationships among these subgroups were not resolved due to the lack of support. The statistical support values for Clade 2 and Clade 6 were weak in the previous study (McTaggart et al. 2012a). Clade 2 lacked Bayesian PP support and Clade 6 with three sub-clades lacked both ML BP and Bayesian PP support. The Ustilago davisii and Ustilago esculenta sub-clades defined by McTaggart et al. (2012a) in Clade 6 also lacked statistical support.
As shown in previous studies based on rRNA gene sequence analyses (Fell et al., 2000, Boekhout et al., 2011), the type species of the genus Pseudozyma, P. prolifica, clustered together with Ustilago maydis in the trees reconstructed from the seven gene, the four protein gene and the two rRNA genes datasets (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3). The type strain of P. prolifica shared identical ITS and LSU rRNA gene sequences with Ustilago maydis CBS 504.76, suggesting that P. prolifica represents the saprobic asexual stage of Ustilago maydis and should be treated as a synonym of the latter according to the new nomenclature for fungi (McNeill et al. 2012). As a consequence, the genus name Pseudozyma is not available any more.
Four Pseudozyma species, namely P. antarctica, P. aphidis, P. parantarctica and P. rugulosa, clustered together with Moesziomyces bullatus, the sole described species of this teleomorphic genus (Begerow et al. 2014) with strong BP and PP support values in the tree constructed from the ITS and LSU dataset (Fig. 2C). The close affinity of the four Pseudozyma species with Moesziomyces bullatus was also resolved and strongly supported in the trees made from the seven genes and the four protein genes datasets (Fig. 1, Fig. 3). Another teleomorphic species, Macalpinomyces eriachnes, occurred as a basal branch to the Moesziomyces clade (Fig. 1, Fig. 3). The close phylogenetic relationship of the four Pseudozyma species with the monotypic genus Moesziomyces suggests that the former represent anamorphic and culturable stages of Moesziomyces species and can be transferred to the genus Moesziomyces.
Pseudozyma graminicola clustered in the recently emended genus Sporisorium (McTaggart et al. 2012b). The closest relative of this species was S. holwayii (Fig. 2B). P. graminicola differed from S. holwayii by 47 (7 %) and 6 (1 %) mismatches in the ITS and LSU rRNA gene regions, respectively, suggesting that the former represents a distinct species in the genus Sporisorium and a new combination is proposed.
The close relationship between Pseudozyma flocculosa and Anthracocystis apludae was shown in the seven genes and the four protein genes based trees (Fig. 1, Fig. 3). The affinity of P. flocculosa with Anthracocystis was confirmed by the phylogenetic analysis based on the ITS and LSU dataset (Fig. 2B). This species has been recently transferred into the genus Anthracocystis by Piątek et al. (2015).
Pseudozyma crassa occurred in the Triodiomyces clade with 75–89 % BP and 1.0 PP support values (Fig. 2C). P. crassa was most closely related to T. altilis with 3 and 92 mismatches in the LSU rRNA gene and ITS region, respectively. The result suggests that P. crassa belongs to the genus Triodiomyces. Pseudozyma jejuensis was located in the Langdonia clade with 56–58 % BP and 0.99 PP support values (Fig. 2B), indicating that this species can be transferred to the genus Langdonia.
Pseudozyma abaconensis, P. shanxiensis and P. siamensis occurred in the Ustilago sensu stricto sub-clade (Clade 6) containing U. hordei, the type species of Ustilago (McTaggart et al. 2012a), with strong BP (90–95 %) and PP (1.0) support values (Fig. 2B). P. siamensis branched first in the Ustilago sensu stricto sub-clade while the phylogenetic positions of P. abaconensis and P. shanxiensis within this sub-clade were not resolved. The Ustilago sensu stricto sub-clade was also resolved as a strongly supported monophyletic group by McTaggart et al. (2012a). Due to the presence of U. hordei, the generic type, the genus name Ustilago will be used for this sub-clade. Therefore, it is reasonable to transfer these three Pseudozyma species to the genus Ustilago.
Three Pseudozyma species, including P. brasiliensis, P. fusiformata and P. vetiver, clustered together in an independent clade with 79–87 % BP and 1.0 PP support values (Fig. 2B). The phylogenetic relationship of this clade with other clades in the Ustilaginales were not resolved based on the phylogenetical analysis of the ITS and LSU datasets, being in agreement with Chamnanpa et al. (2013) and Oliveira et al. (2014). The result suggests that this clade represents a distinct genus. Pseudozyma churashimaensis occurred in an isolated deep branch within Ustilaginaceae in the tree drawn from the ITS and LSU dataset (Fig. 2C). The affinity of this species to any teleomorphic taxa was not resolved, suggesting that this species represents another genus.
Three Pseudozyma species, including P. alboarmeniaca, P. thailandica and P. tsukubaensis clustered in Clade 7 recognised by McTaggart et al. (2012a) with 73 % ML BP and 1.0 PP support values (Fig. 2C). This clade containing mixed smut species from the genera Macalpinomyces, Sporisorium and Ustilago, was also resolved by Stoll et al., 2003, Stoll et al., 2005. P. thailandica was most closely related to Macalpinomyces viridians; P. tsukubaensis had identical LSU rRNA gene sequences with Ma. spermophorus; and P. alboarmeniaca showed close affinity to Ustilago austro-africana, Ma. spermophorus and P. tsukubaensis. Because of the taxonomic confusion between the teleomorphic genera, the taxonomic treatment of these three Pseudozyma species should be made together with the taxonomic revision of the teleomorphic species in this clade.
Pseudozyma pruni clustered together with the teleomorphic species Anomalomyces yakirrae, Anomalomyces panici and Sporisorium trachypogonis-plumosi without significant support (Fig. 2B). P. pruni was proposed as a close relative of P. fusiformata by Liou et al. (2009). The former exhibited a close affinity to A. yakirrae in previous studies based on sequence analysis of the ITS and LSU rRNA gene regions (Chamnanpa et al., 2013, Oliveira et al., 2014). A. panici, the type species of the genus Anomalomyces, was located in an isolated branch in the Ustilaginales in McTaggart et al. (2012a). A. yakirrae was proposed as the second member in Anomalomyces by Shivas et al. (2013) because it was located in the same clade with A. panici in the ITS and LSU rRNA gene based tree. A. yakirrae and A. panici also shared some morphological characters and occurred on closely related hosts. However, the close relationship between A. yakirrae and A. panici was not confidently resolved in this study and was only weakly supported by previous molecular data compared in Shivas et al. (2013). Thus, a more robust phylogenetic analysis using more genes will be required for a taxonomic treatment of P. pruni and related teleomorphic species.
In the tree based on the seven genes dataset (Fig. 1), the position of Pseudozyma hubeiensis remained uncertain probably because of the limited sampling of teleomorphic taxa. In the ITS and LSU dataset based tree, this species was located in Clade 2 (McTaggart et al. 2012a) together with Ustilago maydis, Ustilago bouriquetii, Tubisorus pachycarpus, Ustilago vetiveriae and Macalpinomyces mackinlayi, but the phylogeny lacked statistical support (Fig. 2B). Thus, the taxonomic position of P. hubeiensis remains to be determined.
Exobasidiomycetes
Eight orders were previously proposed in this class (Begerow et al., 2006, Begerow et al., 2014, Boekhout et al., 2011). After the proposal of class Malasseziomycetes to accommodate the Malasseziales (Wang et al. 2014), Exobasidiomycetes currently contains four orders, Entylomatales, Exobasidiales, Georgefischeriales and Microstromatales, that have species with a yeast state and three orders, Ceraceosorales, Doassansiales and Tilletiales, that do not have any known yeast species (Boekhout et al. 2011). Begerow et al. (2006) proposed the order Ceraceosorales for Ceraceosorus bombacis which appeared to be closely related to a yeast-like species Tilletiopsis albescens. However, in the tree drawn form the LSU dataset in this study, T. albescens is not closely related to C. bombacis (Fig. 4). The phylogenetic position of C. bombacis and its relationship with T. albescens remain controversial (Hibbett et al., 2007, Boekhout et al., 2011, Begerow et al., 2014).
Fig. 4.
Phylogenetic tree constructed from maximum likelihood analysis based on the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA, showing the relationships of taxa within the Exobasidiomycetes. Bootstrap percentages over 50 % from 1 000 replicates are shown. Taxa in bold are yeast and yeast-like fungi.
In the trees constructed from the seven genes, the four protein coding genes and the two rRNA genes, each of the four yeast containing orders, Entylomatales, Exobasidiales, Georgefischeriales and Microstromatales, was resolved as a strongly supported monophyletic clade. The three orders without yeast species were also resolved as separate clades in these analyses (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4). However, these orders assigned to Exobasidiomycetes did not form a monophyletic lineage. In the trees drawn from the seven genes and the four protein coding genes, the Georgefischeriales occurred as a sister lineage to Moniliellomycetes with strong support (Fig. 1, Fig. 3). The orders Entylomatales, Exobasidiales and Doassansiales formed a monophyletic lineage together but with weak BP support; while Microstromatales and Tilletiales formed distinct lineages with paraphyletic relationships to the other orders in Exobasidiomycetes (Fig. 1, Fig. 3). The results confirmed that Exobasidiomycetes is not monophyletic, but might support the originally described superorder Exobasidianae including the three orders Entylomatales, Doassansiales and Exobasidiales based on morphological similarities of the interaction apparatus as suggested by Bauer et al. (1997).
Seven genera of yeasts or yeast-like fungi, namely Acaromyces, Jaminaea, Meira, Rhodotorula (pro parte), Sympodiomycopsis, Tilletiaria and Tilletiopsis are currently included in the Exobasidiomycetes. Since the protein coding gene and even the SSU and ITS rRNA gene sequences of many teleomorphic taxa of Exobasidiomycetes are not available at present, a supplementary dataset containing only LSU rRNA gene sequences was used for analysing the phylogenetic relationships of yeast species with teleomorphic species in the Exobasidiomycetes.
In the trees drawn from the seven genes, the four protein genes and the ITS dataset, Acaromyces ingoldii and three Meira species were located together with three Exobasidium species in the Exobasidiales with strong support (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3), being in agreement with Boekhout et al. (2011). However, in the tree made from the LSU dataset containing more teleomorphic species, the taxa of Exobasidiales as defined by Begerow et al. (2014) were separated into two clades (Fig. 4). Ac. ingoldii occurred in a well supported clade together with species of the teleomorphic genera Clinoconidium, Coniodictyum, Drepanoconis and Laurobasidium. Ac. ingoldii was closely related with Laurobasidium lauri and shared an identical LSU rRNA gene sequence with a GenBank entry (AB177562) labelled as ‘Laurobasidium hachijoense’ (Exobasidium hachijoense). The name Laurobasidium hachijoense has not been validly published and L. lauri is presently the solely published species in the genus Laurobasidium (Begerow et al. 2014). It is not sure whether Ac. ingoldii represents an anamorphic species of Laurobasidium because the ML BP support for a close affinity of Ac. ingoldii and L. lauri remained weak (62 %) (Fig. 4). Besides, the sequence difference between Ac. ingoldii and L. lauri appeared greater than that between the two teleomorphic species Clinoconidium bullatum and Drepanoconis larviformis presently classified into different genera. Therefore, the genus Acaromyces will be maintained at present. In the LSU rRNA gene-based tree, the Meira species were located in another clade together with teleomorphic species from Exobasidium and other genera of the Exobasidiales, including Dicellomyces, Graphiola and Kordyana (Fig. 4). In this clade, the four Meira species formed a distinct sub-clade with 100 % ML BP value, supporting the recognition of this genus.
The Jaminaea and Sympodiomycopsis species and three Rhodotorula species clustered in the Microstromatales together with teleomorphic species of Microstroma, Quambalaria and Volvocisporium (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 4). The two Jaminaea species formed a first branched clade in the Microstromatales in the seven genes and the four protein genes based trees (Fig. 1, Fig. 3). A close relationship of the Jaminaea species with Microstroma albiziae was shown in the trees drawn from the combined seven gene sequences (Fig. 1) and the LSU rRNA gene sequences alone (Fig. 4), but not supported in the combination of ITS and LSU datasets (Fig. 2D). The genus Microstroma is polyphyletic as shown previously (Begerow et al., 2006, Begerow et al., 2014, Boekhout et al., 2011) and in the present study. M. albiziae is not the type species of the genus, and, therefore, the genus Jaminaea should be remained. However, the affiliation to Jaminea or Sympodiomycopsis lacks fundamental support and further data are needed before a new combination can be proposed. Begerow et al. (2014) assigned Jaminea to the family Quambalariaceae, but the close relationship of this genus with the teleomorphic species Quambalaria cyanescens was not shown in any of the trees constructed in this study. Therefore and due to the lack of other Quambalaria species in our dataset, it is preferred to treat Jaminaea as ‘incertae sedis’ within Microstromatales as Sipiczki & Kajdacsi (2009) suggested before.
The affiliation of Sympodiomycopsis species within the Microstromatales was confirmed in this study, but the relationship of this genus with the other members of the order was not resolved (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4), being in agreement with Begerow et al. (2014) who treated the genus as ‘incertae sedis’ in the Microstromatales.
Among the three Rhodotorula species belonging to the Microstromatales, R. bacarum had almost identical ITS and LSU rRNA gene sequences with Microstroma album, the type species of the genus Microstroma (Fig. 2, Fig. 4). As commented by Sampaio (2011), R. bacarum should be regarded as representing the asexual stage of M. album and thus should be treated as a synonym of the latter. The other two Rhodotorula species, R. hinnulea and R. phylloplana, exhibited a close relationship with Microstroma juglandis in all the trees constructed in this study (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4). R. hinnulea was considered a synonym of R. phylloplana in Sampaio (2011) because of identical ITS and LSU rRNA gene sequences. In this study we showed that the type strains of the two species also shared similar protein gene sequences (Fig. 3), supporting their assumed conspecificity (Fig. 2D). In the LSU rRNA gene based tree, R. phylloplana was located together with M. juglandis (Fig. 4). In the seven genes and the four protein genes based trees, the close affinity of R. phylloplana and M. juglandis with R. bacarum (the anamorph of M. album) was resolved (Fig. 1, Fig. 3). The result suggests that R. phylloplana represents an anamorphic species in the genus Microstroma.
In agreement with previous studies (Fell et al. 2000) the genus Tilletiopsis was shown to be polyphyletic in this study. Three Tilletiopsis species, including the type species of the genus, T. washingtonensis, formed a well supported (100 % BP and 1.0 PP) clade in the Entylomales in all the trees constructed using different datasets (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4). This clade was resolved as a sister group of the genus Entyloma. The result suggests that this clade represents a distinct genus which should keep the name Tilletiopsis.
Six Tilletiopsis species belonged to the Georgefischeriales (Fig. 4). As shown in Boekhout et al. (2011), T. derxii, T. flava, T. fulvescens and T. oryzicola formed a clade together with two teleomorphic species Tilletiaria anomala and Phragmotaenium indicum in the tree constructed from the LSU rRNA gene sequences (Fig. 4). The latter two teleomorphic species differ remarkably in the morphology of teliospores (Bauer et al. 2001b) and the genetic distance between them is similar with those between other genera, suggesting they represent two different genera. Tilletiaria anomala formed a basal position in this clade. The four Tilletiopsis species were resolved to be more closely related to Phragmotaenium indicum with 90 % ML BP support, suggesting that they belong to the genus Phragmotaenium.
The other two Tilletiopsis species in the Georgefischeriales, T. minor and T. penniseti, formed another clade with a teleomorphic species Gjaerumia ossifragi, the type of the genus, as a basal branch with 61 % ML BP support (Fig. 4). Bauer et al. (2005) also showed that G. ossifragi formed a statistically supported cluster with T. minor, T. penniseti, and two undescribed Tilletiopsis species based on the Bayesian inference analysis of the LSU rRNA genes. The results support transferring T. minor and T. penniseti into Gjaerumia.
Two Tilletiopsis species, T. albescens and T. pallescens, could not be assigned to any recognised orders in the Exobasidiomycetes. In the ML trees constructed from the seven gene and four protein gene datasets, they clustered together in a deep lineage with 93 % and 94 % BP support, but their phylogenetic relationship with other lineages of Exobasidiomycetes was not resolved. The MP and BI analyses of the two datasets did not support a close relationship between the two Tilletiopsis species (Fig. 1, Fig. 3). In the trees generated from the other datasets, these two species formed independent deep branches with uncertain phylogenetic positions (Fig. 2, Fig. 4). These two Tilletiopsis species were also treated as ‘incertae sedis’ in the Exobasidiomycetes by Begerow et al., 2006, Begerow et al., 2014 and Hibbett et al. (2007). Our results suggested that T. albescens and T. pallescens represent two separate genera belonging to two different orders.
Taxonomy
The phylogenetic analyses described above confirm that the class Exobasidiomycetes is polyphyletic. However, it is immature to redefine this class at present because molecular data, especially protein gene sequences from the majority of the teleomorphic taxa in this class, that will offer a more robust phylogenetic analysis integrating the yeasts, are not available. It is, however, needed to make taxonomic revisions for yeast taxa at the genus level based on the phylogenetic data presented here. Fereydounia, Jaminaea, Meira, Sympodiomycopsis and Tilletiaria together with Malassezia and Moniliella as shown in Wang et al. (2014) and Nasr et al. (2014) are monophyletic genera. In order to avoid possible name changes in the future, Acaromyces will be remained at present before a taxonomic revision can be made that need to include more teleomorphic genera.
We propose to transfer the Farysizyma species to the genus Farysia and Rhodotorula phylloplana to Microstroma. For the Pseudozyma species, it is clear that P. prolifica, the type species of the genus, is a synonym of Ustilago maydis. We propose to transfer 1) P. abaconensis, P. shanxiensis and P. siamensis to the genus Ustilago; 2) P. antarctica, P. aphidis, P. parantarctica and P. rugulosa to Moesziomyces; 3) P. crassa to Triodiomyces; 4) P. graminicola to Sporisorium; and 5) P. jejuensis to Langdonia. P. brasiliensis, P. fusiformata, and P. vetiver represent a new genus for which we propose Kalmanozyma gen. nov. Pseudozyma churashimaensis represents another new genus for which Dirkmeia gen. nov. is proposed. The taxonomic treatment for the remaining Pseudozyma species, including P. alboarmeniaca, P. thailandica, P. tsukubaensis, P. hubeiensis and P. pruni remains to be determined. These species are embedded in groups with lots of teleomorphic species, where only very few specimens have been sequenced so far, thus we expect, that they probably have already a synonym, which we just did not identify so far. Because the genus name Pseudozyma is not available any more, we suggest to use ‘pro tempore’ or ‘pro tem.’ in abbreviation to indicate that these species names are temporarily remained.
We propose to emend the genus Tilletiopsis in the order Entylomatales by retaining the genus name for the monophyletic clade represented by the type species T. washingtonensis. For the taxonomic treatments of the remaining Tilletiopsis species, we propose to transfer T. derxii, T. flava, T. fulvescens and T. oryzicola to the genus Phragmotaenium; and T. minor and T. penniseti to Gjaerumia. Two new generic names, Robbauera gen. nov. and Golubevia gen. nov., are proposed for T. albescens and T. pallescens, respectively. Two new orders are also proposed for them to accommodate the sisterhood of these two new genera with other orders of Exobasidiomycetes.
Golubeviales Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout ord. nov. MycoBank MB812083.
Member of Exobasidiomycetes. The diagnosis of the order Golubeviales is based on the description of the genus Golubevia. The nomenclature of the order is based on the genus Golubevia.
Type family: Golubeviaceae Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout
Golubeviaceae Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow, & Boekhout fam. nov. MycoBank MB812692.
Member of Golubeviales (Exobasidiomycetes).The diagnosis of the family Golubeviaceae is based on the description of the genus Golubevia. The nomenclature of the family is based on the genus Golubevia.
Type genus: Golubevia Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout
Golubevia Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout gen. nov. MycoBank MB812694.
Etymology: The genus is named in honour of W.I. Golubev for his pioneering contributions to the taxonomic of basidiomycetous yeasts.
This genus is proposed for the single species clade formed by Tilletiopsis pallescens as resolved by multiple gene sequence analyses. It occurred as a sister lineage of the other orders within Exobasidiomycetes (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4).
Sexual reproduction unknown, but chlamydospore-like structures germinating with a holobasidium-like structure that forms ballistospores on the apex, have been observed (Begerow et al. 2000). Colonies pale yellowish-brown or cream and have an eroded margin. Budding cells present. Hyphae regularly branched, narrow and cylindrical, and with retraction septa, but lack clamp connections. Chlamydospores may occur terminally or intercalarily. Ballistoconidia present. Xylose absent, but glucose, galactose and mannose present in whole-cell hydrolysates. The major ubiquinone Q-10. Starch-like compounds are not produced.
Type species: Golubevia pallescens (Gokhale) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812695.
Robbauerales Boekhout, Begerow, Q.M. Wang & F.Y. Bai ord. nov. MycoBank MB812696.
Member of Exobasidiomycetes. The diagnosis of the order Robbauerales is based on the description of the genus Robbauera. The nomenclature of the order is based on the genus Robbauera.
Type family: Robbaueraceae Boekhout, Begerow, Q.M. Wang & F.Y. Bai
Robbaueraceae Boekhout, Begerow, Q.M. Wang & F.Y. Bai fam. nov. MycoBank MB812697.
Member of Robbauerales (Exobasidiomycetes). The diagnosis of the family Robbaueraceae is based on the description of the genus Robbauera. The nomenclature of the family is based on the genus Robbauera.
Type genus: Robbauera Boekhout, Begerow, Q.M. Wang & F.Y. Bai
Robbauera Boekhout, Begerow, Q.M. Wang & F.Y. Bai gen. nov. MycoBank MB812698.
Etymology: The genus is named in honour of Robert Bauer for his contributions to the taxonomy and ultrastructure of smuts.
This genus is proposed for the single species clade formed by Tilletiopsis albescens as resolved by multiple gene sequence analyses. It occurred as a sister lineage of the other orders within Exobasidiomycetes (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4).
Sexual reproduction unknown. Colonies are whitish-cream and with an eroded margin. Hyphae regularly branched, narrow, with retraction septa, but lack clamp connections. Chlamydospores may be present. Ballistoconidia present. Xylose absent, but glucose, galactose and mannose present in whole-cell hydrolysates. The major ubiquinone Q-10. Starch-like compounds not produced.
Type species: Robbauera albescens (Gokhale) Boekhout, Begerow, Q.M. Wang & F.Y. Bai comb. nov. MycoBank MB812699.
Basionym: Tilletiopsis albescens Gokhale, Nova Hedwigia 23: 803. 1972.
Dirkmeia F.Y. Bai, Q.M. Wang, Begerow & Boekhout gen. nov. MycoBank MB812700.
Etymology: the genus is named in honour of Dirk van der Mei who was a former director of CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre (CBS-KNAW).
Member of Ustilaginaceae (Ustilaginales, Ustilaginomycetes). This genus is proposed to accommodate Pseudozyma churashimaensis which belongs to an isolated branch in the Ustilaginaceae based on the combined ITS and LSU rRNA gene sequence analysis (Fig. 2C).
Sexual reproduction unknown. Colonies cream-coloured, shiny, smooth, and with an eroded margin. Budding cells present. Ballistoconidia absent. Cell carbohydrates not determined. The major ubiquinone unknown. Starch-like compounds not produced.
Type species: Dirkmeia churashimaensis (T. Morita, Y. Ogura, M. Takash., N. Hirose, Fukuoka, Imura, Y. Kondo & Kitamoto) F.Y. Bai, Q.M. Wang, Begerow & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812727.
Basionym: Pseudozyma churashimaensis T. Morita, Y. Ogura, M. Takash., N. Hirose, Fukuoka, Imura, Y. Kondo & Kitamoto, J. Biosci. Bioeng. 112: 142. 2011.
Kalmanozyma Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout gen. nov. MycoBank MB812702.
Etymology: The genus is named in honour of Kálmán Vánky for his contributions to the taxonomy of smuts.
Member of Ustilaginaceae (Ustilaginales, Ustilaginomycetes). This genus is proposed to accommodate Pseudozyma fusiformata, Pseudozyma brasiliensis and Pseudozyma vetiver that form a distinct clade in the Ustilaginaceae based on the phylogenetic analysis of the ITS and LSU rRNA gene sequences (Fig. 2B).
Sexual reproduction unknown. Colonies whitish, cream to light salmon, shiny, smooth, and with an eroded margin. Budding cells present. Ballistoconidia absent. Pseudomycelium and true mycelium may be formed. Cell carbohydrates not determined. The major ubiquinone Q-10. Starch-like compounds not produced.
Type species: Kalmanozyma fusiformata (Buhagiar) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812703.
Basionym: Candida fusiformata Buhagiar, J. Gen. Microbiol. 110: 95. 1979.
≡ Pseudozyma fusiformata (Buhagiar) Boekhout, J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 41: 363. 1995.
New combinations in Kalmanozyma
Kalmanozyma brasiliensis (J.V.C. Oliveira, T.A. Borges, R.A.C. Santos, L.F.D. Freitas, C.A. Rosa, G.H. Goldman & D.M. Riaño-Pachón) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812704.
Basionym: Pseudozyma brasiliensis J.V.C. Oliveira, T.A. Borges, R.A.C. Santos, L.F.D. Freitas, C.A. Rosa, G.H. Goldman & D.M. Riaño-Pachón, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 64: 2159. 2013.
Kalmanozyma vetiver (Chamnanpa & Limtong) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812735.
Basionym: Pseudozyma vetiver Chamnanpa & Limtong, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 104: 637. 2013.
Tilletiopsis Derx, Bulletin du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg 17: 471. 1948. emend. Begerow, Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout.
Member of Entylomatales (Exobasidiomycetes). This genus is emended to include only the species in the clade represented by T. washingtonensis, T. lilacina and T. cremea.
Sexual reproduction unknown. Colonies cream coloured and with an entire or eroded margin. Budding cells present. Hyphae narrow, with retraction septa, but lack clamp connections. Chlamydospores may be present. Ballistoconidia present. Xylose in cell wall hydrolysate absent. The major ubiquinone Q-10. Starch-like compounds not produced.
Type species: Tilletiopsis washingtonensis Nyland, Mycologia 42: 488. 1950.
Anthracocystis Bref., Unters. Gesammtgeb. Mykol. (Leipzig) 15: 53. 1912.
Type species: Anthracocystis destruens Bref.
New combination in Anthracocystis
Anthracocystis pampara (Speg.) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812705.
Basionym: Ustilago pamparum Speg., Boln Acad. nac. Cienc. Córdoba 11: 28. 1887.
≡ Sphacelotheca pamparum (Speg.) G.P. Clinton, J. Mycol. 8: 140. 1902.
Farysia Racib., Bull. int. Acad. Sci. Lett. Cracovie, Cl. sci. math. nat. Sér. B, sci. nat. 3: 354. 1909. emend. Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout.
= Elateromyces Bubák, Arch. Přírodov. Výzk. Čech. 15: 32. 1912.
= Farysizyma A. Fonseca, FEMS Yeast Res. 8: 505. 2008.
Type species: Farysia butleri (H. & P. Sydow) H. & P. Sydow.
This genus was originally described for teleomorphic smut fungi occurring on Cyperaceae plants and was redefined Vánky, 2002, Vánky, 2012. Here it is emended to include free-living yeast species with unknown sexual states as shown by molecular phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2C).
New combinations in Farysia
Farysia itapuensis (Landell & Valente) Begerow, Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812706.
Basionym: Farysizyma itapuensis Landell & Valente, FEMS Yeast Res. 8: 506. 2008.
Farysia taiwaniana (P.-H. Wang, Y.-T. Wang & S.-H. Yang) Begerow, Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812707.
Basionym: Farysizyma taiwaniana P.-H. Wang, Y.-T. Wang & S.-H. Yang, FEMS Yeast Res. 8: 506. 2008.
Farysia setubalensis (Fonseca & Inácio) Begerow, Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812708.
Basionym: Farysizyma setubalensis Fonseca & Inácio., FEMS Yeast Res. 8: 507. 2008.
Farysia acheniorum (Buhagiar & Barnett) Begerow, Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812709.
Basionym: Sterigmatomyces acheniorum Buhagiar & Barnett., J. Gen. Microbiol. 77: 78. 1973.
≡ Farysizyma acheniorum (Buhagiar & Barnett) Fonseca, FEMS Yeast Res. 8: 499. 2008.
≡ Rhodotorula acheniorum (Buhagiar & Barnett) Rodrigues de Miranda, Stud. Mycol. 14: 28. 1977.
Gjaerumia R. Bauer, M. Lutz & Oberw., Mycol. Res. 109: 1257. 2005. emend. Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout.
Type species: Gjaerumia ossifragi (Rostr.) R. Bauer, M. Lutz & Oberw.
This genus was originally proposed for teleomorphic smut fungi occurring on Asparagaceae, Melanthiaceae and Xanthorrhoeaceae (Bauer et al. 2005) and is emended to include free-living yeast species with unknown sexual states as shown by molecular phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 4).
New combinations in Gjaerumia
Gjaerumia minor (Nyland) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812710.
Basionym: Tilletiopsis minor Nyland, Mycologia 42: 489. 1950.
Gjaerumia penniseti (Takashima & Nakase) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812711.
Basionym: Tilletiopsis penniseti Takashima & Nakase, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 80: 43. 2001.
Langdonia McTaggart & R.G. Shivas, Persoonia, 29: 130. 2012. emend. Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout.
Type species: Langdonia fraseriana (Syd.) McTaggart & R.G. Shivas.
This genus was originally proposed for teleomorphic smut fungi occurring on Poaceae (McTaggart et al. 2012b) and is emendied to include free-living yeast species with unknown sexual states as showed by molecular phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2B).
New combination in Langdonia
Langdonia jejuensis (Seo, Um, Min, Rhee, Cho, Kim & Lee) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812712.
Basionym: Pseudozyma jejuensis H.S. Seo, H.J. Um, J. Min, S.K. Rhee, T.J. Cho, Y. H. Kim & J. Lee, FEMS Yeast Res. 7: 1039. 2007.
Microstroma Niessl, Öst. bot. Z. 11: 250. 1861. emend. Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout.
Type species: Microstroma album (Desm.) Sacc.
This genus was originally proposed for teleomorphic smut fungi occurring on Juglandaceae, Fabaceae and Fagaceaeas (Begerow et al. 2014) as defined by Pires (1928) and is emended to include free-living yeast species with unknown sexual states as shown by molecular phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2D).
New combinations in Microstroma
Microstroma phylloplanum (R.G. Shivas & Rodr. Mir.) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812713.
Basionym: Cryptococcus phylloplanus R.G. Shivas & Rodr. Mir., Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 49: 153. 1983.
≡ Rhodotorula phylloplana (R.G. Shivas & Rodr. Mir.) Rodr. Mir. & Weijman, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 54: 549. 1988.
≡ Cryptococcus hinnuleus R.G. Shivas & Rodr. Mir., Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 49: 155. 1983.
= Rhodotorula hinnulea (R.G. Shivas & Rodr. Mir.) Rodr. Mir. & Weijman, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 54: 549. 1988.
Moesziomyces Vánky, Bot. Notiser 130: 133. 1977. emend. Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout.
Type species: Moesziomyces bullatus (J. Schröt.) Vánky
This genus was originally proposed for a teleomorphic smut fungus occurring on Poaceae as defined by Vánky, 2002, Vánky, 2012 and is emended to include free-living yeast species with unknown sexual states as showed by molecular phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2C).
New combinations in Moesziomyces
Moesziomyces antarcticus (Goto, Sugiyama & Iizuka) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812714.
Basionym: Sporobolomyces antarcticus Goto, Sugiyama & Iizuka, Mycologia 61: 759. 1969.
≡ Pseudozyma antarctica (Goto, Sugiyama & Iizuka) Boekhout, J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 41: 364. 1995.
≡ Candida antarctica (Goto, Sugiyama & Iizuka) Kurtzman, M.J. Smiley, C.J. Johnson & M.J. Hoffman, Yeasts: Characteristics and Identification (Cambridge): 86. 1983.
≡ Vanrija antarctica (Goto, Sugiyama & Iizuka) R.T. Moore, Bibl. Mycol. 108: 167. 1987.
= Trichosporon oryzae H. Ito, Iizuka & T. Sato, Agric. Biol. Chem. 38: 1599. 1974.
Moesziomyces aphidis (Henninger & Windisch) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812715.
Basionym: Sterigmatomyces aphidis Henninger & Windisch, Arch. Mikrobiol. 105: 50. 1975.
≡ Pseudozyma aphidis (Henninger & Windisch) Boekhout, J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 41: 364. 1995.
Moesziomyces rugulosus (Traquair, L.A. Shaw & Jarvis) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812716.
Basionym: Sporothrix rugulosa Traquair, L.A. Shaw & Jarvis, Can. J. Bot. 66: 929. 1988.
≡ Pseudozyma rugulosa (Traquair, L.A. Shaw & Jarvis) Boekhout & Traquair, J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 41: 364. 1995.
≡ Stephanoascus rugulosus Traquair, L.A. Shaw & Jarvis, Can. J. Bot. 66: 929. 1988.
Moesziomyces parantarcticus (Sugita, Takashima, Mekha & Poonwan) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812717.
Basionym: Pseudozyma parantarctica Sugita, Takashima, Mekha & Poonwan, Microbiol. Immun. 47: 186. 2003.
Phragmotaenium R. Bauer, Begerow, A. Nagler & Oberw., Mycol. Res. 105: 423. 2001. emend. Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout.
Type species: Phragmotaenium indicum (Vánky, M.S. Patil & N.D. Sharma) R. Bauer, Begerow, A. Nagler & Oberw.
This genus was originally proposed for a teleomorphic smut species occurring on Poaceae (Bauer et al. 2001b) and is emended to include free-living yeast species with unknown sexual states as shown by molecular phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 4).
New combinations in Phragmotaenium
Phragmotaenium flavum (Tubaki) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812726.
Basionym: Tilletiopsis minor Nyland var. flava Tubaki, Nagaoa 1: 28. 1952.
≡ Tilletiopsis flava (Tubaki) Boekhout, Stud. Mycol. 33: 151. 1991.
Phragmotaenium derxii (Takashima & Nakase) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812718.
Basionym: Tilletiopsis derxii Takashima & Nakase, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 80: 43. 2001.
Phragmotaenium oryzicola (Takashima & Nakase) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812719.
Basionym: Tilletiopsis oryzicola Takashima & Nakase, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 80: 43. 2001.
Phragmotaenium fulvescens (Gokhale) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812720.
Basionym: Tilletiopsis fulvescens Gokhale, Nova Hedwigia 23: 805. 1972.
Sporisorium Ehrenb. ex Link, in Willdenow, Sp. pl., Edn 4 6: 86. 1825. emend. Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout.
Type species: Sporisorium sorghi Ehrenb. ex Link
This genus was originally proposed for teleomorphic smut fungi occurring on Poaceae. It was emended by McTaggart et al. (2012b) to include only the Sporisorium sensu stricto clade. Here it is emended further to include free-living yeast species with unknown sexual states as shown by molecular phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2B).
New combination in Sporisorium
Sporisorium graminicola (W. Golubev, Sugita & N. Golubev) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812721.
Basionym: Pseudozyma graminicola W. Golubev, Sugita & N. Golubev, Mycoscience 48: 30. 2007.
Triodiomyces McTaggart & R.G. Shivas, Persoonia 29: 131. 2012. emend. Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout.
Type species: Triodiomyces altilis (Syd.) McTaggart & R.G. Shivas
This genus was originally proposed to accommodate a group of teleomorphic smut fungi occurring on grasses of the genus Triodia (McTaggart et al. 2012b) and is emended to include free-living yeast species with unknown sexual states as shown by molecular phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2C).
New combination in Triodiomyces
Triodiomyces crassus (Mekha, Takashima & Sugita) Q.M. Wang, F.Y. Bai, Begerow & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812722.
Basionym: Pseudozyma crassa Mekha, Takashima & Sugita, Microbiol. Immunol. 58: 9. 2014.
New combinations in Ustilago (Pers.) Roussel, Fl. Calvados, Edn 2: 47. 1806.
Type species: Ustilago hordei (Pers.) Lagerh.
The genus Ustilago is polyphyletic and remains to be redefined (McTaggart et al. 2012a, b). It is immature to emend this genus at present but it is reasonable to transfer the three Pseudozyma species to this genus because they are located in the monophyletic Ustilago sensu stricto clade containing the type species of the genus (Fig. 2B). Thus the genus Ustilago also contains anamorphic fungi.
Ustilago abaconensis (Statzell, Scorzetti & Fell) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812723.
Basionym: Pseudozyma abaconensis Statzell, Scorzetti & Fell, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 60: 1983. 2010.
Ustilago shanxiensis (F.Y. Bai & Q.M. Wang) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812724.
Basionym: Pseudozyma shanxiensis F.Y. Bai & Q.M. Wang, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56: 292. 2006.
Ustilago siamensis (Sugita, Takashima, Poonwan & Mekha) Q.M. Wang, Begerow, F.Y. Bai & Boekhout comb. nov. MycoBank MB812725.
Basionym: Pseudozyma siamensis Sugita, Takashima, Poonwan & Mekha, Microbiol. Immun. 58: 9. 2014.
Acknowledgements
We thank Walter Gams for his nomenclatural advice. This study was supported by grants No. 31010103902, No. 30970013 and No. 31570016 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), grant No. 10CDP019 from the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and No. 2012078 from the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. TB is supported by grant NPRP 5-298-3-086 from the Qatar National Research Fund, a member of Qatar Foundation. The authors are solely responsible for the content of this work.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre.
Contributor Information
F.-Y. Bai, Email: baify@im.ac.cn.
T. Boekhout, Email: t.boekhout@cbs.knaw.nl.
References
- Bandoni R.J., Johri B.N. Tilletiaria: a new genus in the Ustilaginales. Canadian Journal of Botany. 1972;50:39–43. [Google Scholar]
- Bauer R., Begerow D., Nagler A. The Georgefischeriales: a phylogenetic hypothesis. Mycological Research. 2001;105:416–424. [Google Scholar]
- Bauer R., Lutz M., Oberwinkler F. Gjaerumia, a new genus in the Georgefischeriales (Ustilaginomycetes) Mycological Research. 2005;109:1250–1258. doi: 10.1017/s0953756205003783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bauer R., Oberwinkler F., Piepenbring M. Ustilaginomycetes. In: McLaughlin D.J., McLaughlin E.G., Lemke P.A., editors. The mycota, VII, Part B: systematics and evolution. Springer-Verlag; Berlin: 2001. pp. 57–83. [Google Scholar]
- Bauer R., Oberwinkler F., Vánky K. Ultrastructural markers and systematics in smut fungi and allied taxa. Canadian Journal of Botany. 1997;75:1273–1314. [Google Scholar]
- Begerow D., Bauer R., Boekhout T. Phylogenetic placements of ustilaginomycetous anamorphs as deduced from nuclear LSU rDNA sequences. Mycological Research. 2000;104:53–60. [Google Scholar]
- Begerow D., Schäfer A.M., Kellner R. Ustilaginomycotina. In: McLaughlin D.J., Spatafora J.W., editors. The mycota, Vol. VII, Part A: systematics and evolution. 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag; Berlin: 2014. pp. 295–329. [Google Scholar]
- Begerow D., Stoll M., Bauer R. A phylogenetic hypothesis of Ustilaginomycotina based on multiple gene analyses and morphological data. Mycologia. 2006;98:906–916. doi: 10.3852/mycologia.98.6.906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boekhout T. A revision of ballistoconidia-forming yeasts and fungi. Studies in Mycology. 1991;33:1–194. [Google Scholar]
- Boekhout T. Pseudozyma Bandoni emend. Boekhout, a genus for yeast-like anamorphs of Ustilaginales. The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology. 1995;41:359–366. [Google Scholar]
- Boekhout T., Fell J.W., O'Donnell K. Molecular systematics of some yeast-like anamorphs belonging to the Ustilaginales and Tilletiales. Studies in Mycology. 1995;38:175–183. [Google Scholar]
- Boekhout T., Fonseca A., Sampaio J.P. Discussion of teleomorphic and anamorphic basidiomycetous yeasts. In: Kurtzman C.P., Fell J.W., Boekhout T., editors. The yeasts, a taxonomic study. 5th edn. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2011. pp. 1339–1372. [Google Scholar]
- Boekhout T., Gildemacher P., Theelen B. Extensive colonization of apples by smut anamorphs causes a new postharvest disorder. FEMS Yeast Research. 2006;6:63–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2005.00002.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boekhout T., Theelen B., Houbraken J. Novel anamorphic mite-associated fungi belonging to the Ustilaginomycetes: Meira geulakonigii Gen. Nov., sp. nov., Meira argovae sp. nov. and Acaromyces ingoldii Gen. Nov., sp. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2003;53:1655–1664. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02434-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boekhout T., van Gool J., van den Boogert H. Karyotyping and G+C composition as taxonomic criteria applied to the systematics of Tilletiopsis and related taxa. Mycological Research. 1992;96:331–342. [Google Scholar]
- Bolano A., Stinchi S., Preziosi R. Rapid methods to extract DNA and RNA from Cryptococcus neoformans. FEMS Yeast Research. 2001;1:221–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2001.tb00037.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chamnanpa T., Limtong P., Srisuk N. Pseudozyma vetiver sp. nov., a novel anamorphic ustilaginomycetous yeast species isolated from the phylloplane in Thailand. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2013;104:637–644. doi: 10.1007/s10482-013-9971-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fell J.W., Boekhout T., Fonseca Á. Biodiversity and systematics of basidiomycetous yeasts as determined by large-subunit rDNA D1/D2 domain sequence analysis. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2000;50:1351–1372. doi: 10.1099/00207713-50-3-1351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gokhale A.A. Studies on the genus Tilletiopsis. Nova Hedwigia. 1972;23:795–809. [Google Scholar]
- Hawksworth D.L. A new dawn for the naming of fungi: impacts of decisions made in Melbourne in July 2011 on the future publication and regulation of fungal names. MycoKeys. 2011;1:7–20. doi: 10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.02.06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hibbett D.S., Binder M., Bischoff J.F. A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the fungi. Mycology Research. 2007;111:509–547. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Inácio J., Landell M.F., Valente P. Farysizyma gen. nov., an anamorphic genus in the Ustilaginales to accommodate three novel epiphytic basidiomycetous yeast species from America, Europe and Asia. FEMS Yeast Research. 2008;8:499–508. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00377.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kurtzman C.P., Fell J.W., Boekhout T. 5th edn. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2011. The yeasts, a taxonomic study. [Google Scholar]
- Liou G.Y., Wei Y.H., Lin S.J. Pseudozyma pruni sp. nov., a novel ustilaginomycetous anamorphic fungus from flowers in Taiwan. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2009;59:1813–1817. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.007765-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matheny P.B., Gossman J.A., Zalar P. Resolving the phylogenetic position of the Wallemiomycetes: an enigmatic major lineage of Basidiomycota. Canadian Journal Botany. 2006;84:1794–1805. [Google Scholar]
- McNeill J., Barrie F.R., Buck W.R. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag KG; Ruggell, Liechtenstein: 2012. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code). Regnum Vegetabile 154.http://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php Available at: [Google Scholar]
- McTaggart A.R., Shivas R.G., Geering A.D. Soral synapomorphies are significant for the systematics of the Ustilago-Sporisorium-Macalpinomyces complex (Ustilaginaceae) Persoonia. 2012;29:63–77. doi: 10.3767/003158512X660562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McTaggart A.R., Shivas R.G., Geering A.D. Taxonomic revision of Ustilago, Sporisorium and Macalpinomyces. Persoonia. 2012;29:116–132. doi: 10.3767/003158512X661462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nasr S., Soudi M.R., Fazeli S.A.S. Expanding evolutionary diversity in the Ustilaginomycotina: Fereydouniaceae fam. nov. and Fereydounia gen. nov., the first urocystidalean yeast lineage. Mycological Progress. 2014;13:1217–1226. [Google Scholar]
- Oliveira J.V., Borges T.A., Corrêa dos Santos R.A. Pseudozyma brasiliensis sp. nov., a xylanolytic, ustilaginomycetous yeast species isolated from an insect pest of sugarcane roots. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2014;64:2159–2168. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.060103-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piątek M., Matthias Lutz M., Yorou N.S. A molecular phylogenetic framework for Anthracocystis (Ustilaginales), including five new combinations (inter alia for the asexual Pseudozyma flocculosa), and description of Anthracocystis grodzinskae sp. nov. Mycological Progress. 2015;14:88. [Google Scholar]
- Pires V.M. Concerning the morphology of Microstroma and the taxonomic position of the genus. American Journal of Botany. 1928;15:132–140. [Google Scholar]
- Posada D., Crandall K.A. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 1998;14:817–818. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raciborski M. Parasitische und epiphytische Pilze Javas. Bulletin International de l'Academie des Sciences de Cracovie Classe des Sciences Mathematiques et Naturelles. 1909;3:346–394. [Google Scholar]
- Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology. 2012;61:539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rush T.A., Aime M.C. The genus Meira: phylogenetic placement and description of a new species. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2013;103:1097–1106. doi: 10.1007/s10482-013-9889-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sampaio J.P. Diversity, phylogeny and classification of basidiomycetous yeasts. In: Agerer R., Piepenbring M., Blanz P., editors. Frontiers in basidiomycote mycology. IHW Verlag; Eching: 2004. pp. 49–80. [Google Scholar]
- Sampaio J.P. Rhodotorula Harrison (1928) In: Kurtzman C.P., Fell J.W., Boekhout T., editors. The yeasts, a taxonomic study. 5th edn. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2011. pp. 1873–1927. [Google Scholar]
- Shivas R.G., Lutz M., McTaggart A.R. Emended description of Anomalomyces (Ustilaginales), including Anomalomyces yakirrae sp. nov. on Yakirra pauciflora (Poaceae) from Australia. Mycobiota. 2013;1:17–24. [Google Scholar]
- Sipiczki M., Kajdacsi E. Jaminaea angkorensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel anamorphic fungus containing an S943 nuclear small-subunit rRNA group IB intron represents a basal branch of Microstromatales. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2009;59:914–920. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.003939-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:2688–2690. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Standley K. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2013;30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stolk A.C., Dakin J.C. Moniliella, a new genus of Moniliales. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1966;32:399–409. doi: 10.1007/BF02097491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stoll M., Begerow D., Oberwinkler F. Molecular phylogeny of Ustilago, Sporisorium, and related taxa based on combined analyses of rDNA sequences. Mycological Research. 2005;109:342–356. doi: 10.1017/s0953756204002229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stoll M., Piepenbring M., Begerow D. Molecular phylogeny of Ustilago and Sporisorium species (Basidiomycota, Ustilaginales) based on internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. Canadian Journal of Botany. 2003;81:976–984. [Google Scholar]
- Sugiyama J., Tokuoka K., Suh S.O. Sympodiomycopsis: a new yeast-like anamorph genus with basidiomycetous nature from orchid nectar. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1991;59:95–108. doi: 10.1007/BF00445653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suh S.O., Sugiyama J. Phylogenetic placement of the basidiomycetous yeasts Kondoa malvinella and Rhodosporidium dacryoidum, and the anamorphic yeast Sympodiomycopsis paphiopedili by means of 18S gene sequence analysis. Mycoscience. 1994;35:367–375. [Google Scholar]
- Swofford D.L. PAUP*. phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland MA. Vánky K, Lutz M, Shivas RG (2006) Anomalomyces panici, new genus and species of Ustilaginomycetes from Australia. Mycologia Balcanica. 2002;3:119–126. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor J.W. One Fungus = One Name: DNA and fungal nomenclature twenty years after PCR. IMA Fungus. 2011;2:113–120. doi: 10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.02.01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vánky K. 2nd edn. APS Press; St Paul: 2002. Illustrated genera of smut fungi. [Google Scholar]
- Vánky K. APS Press; St. Paul: 2012. Smut fungi of the world. [Google Scholar]
- Wang Q.M., Bai F.Y. Molecular phylogeny of basidiomycetous yeasts in the Cryptococcus luteolus lineage (Tremellales) based on nuclear rDNA and mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequence analyses: proposal of Derxomyces gen. nov. and Hannaella gen. nov., and description of eight novel Derxomyces species. FEMS Yeast Research. 2008;8:799–814. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00403.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Q.M., Theelen B., Groenewald M. Moniliellomycetes and Malasseziomycetes, two new classes in Ustilaginomycotina. Persoonia. 2014;33:41–47. doi: 10.3767/003158514X682313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weiß M., Bauer R., Begerow D. Spotlights on heterobasidiomycetes. In: Agerer R., Piepenbring M., Blanz P., editors. Frontiers in basidiomycote mycology. IHW Verlag; Eching: 2004. pp. 7–48. [Google Scholar]







