Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2016 Feb 17;72(Pt 3):358–362. doi: 10.1107/S2056989016002206

Crystal structure of fac-tricarbon­yl(cyclo­hexyl isocyanide-κC)(quinoline-2-carboxyl­ato-κ2 N,O)rhenium(I)

Charalampos Triantis a, Antonio Shegani a, Christos Kiritsis a, Catherine Raptopoulou b, Vassilis Psycharis b,*, Maria Pelecanou c, Ioannis Pirmettis a, Minas Papadopoulos a
PMCID: PMC4778812  PMID: 27006808

The ReI atom in the mol­ecule of the title compound has a distorted C4NO coordination sphere defined by three carbonyl ligands, one chelating quinaldate anion and one isocyanide ligand. As a result of the trans effect of the isocyanide derivative, one Re—CO bond is elongated.

Keywords: crystal structure, rhenium(I) tricarbonyl complex, rhenium(I) cyclo­hexyl isocyanide and quinaldic acid complex, structural trans effect, Hirshfeld surface analysis

Abstract

In the title compound, [Re(C10H6NO2)(C7H11N)(CO)3], the ReI atom is coordinated by three carbonyl ligands in a facial arrangement and by the N, O and C atoms from a chelating quinaldate anion and a monodentate isocyanide ligand, respectively. The resultant C4NO coordination sphere is distorted octa­hedral. A lengthening of the axial Re—CO bond trans to the isocyanide ligand is indicative of the trans effect. Individual complexes are stacked into rods parallel to [001] through displaced π–π inter­actions. Weak C—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding inter­actions between the rods lead to the formation of layers parallel to (010). These layers are stacked along [010] by C—H⋯H—C van der Waals contacts.

Chemical context  

Tri­carbonyl­rhenium(I) compounds are being explored as luminescent probes for cell imaging, photosensitizers in photocatalysis (Lyczko et al., 2015; Bertrand et al., 2014), and as potential radiopharmaceuticals based on the already extensive use of radioactive 186/188Re compounds in nuclear medicine for pain palliation and radiosynovectomy (Schneider et al., 2005; Bodei et al., 2008). Recent studies have also revealed the potential of cold tri­carbonyl­rhenium(I) complexes as anti­cancer agents (Leodinova & Gasser, 2014).graphic file with name e-72-00358-scheme1.jpg

As part of our ongoing research in the field of Re/Tc coordination compounds, the crystal structure of a new ‘2 + 1’ tricarbonyl rhenium complex, fac-[M(CO)3(L)(QA-NO)], where M is Re,Tc, L is the monodentate ligand cyclo­hexyl­isocyanide, and QA-NO is deprotonated quinaldic acid, is presented. As a result of of the versatility of the ‘2 + 1’ system, fac-[M(CO)3(L)(QA-NO)] complexes can be used as model compounds in the development of targeted radiopharmaceuticals or anti­cancer agents by suitable replacement of either the bidentate or monodentate ligand. For example, the monodentate ligand may be the isocyanide derivative of a pharmacophore with affinity for a certain receptor. Alternatively, the bidentate ligand may be a more extensive conjugated system to act as a DNA inter­calator. Both quinaldate- and isocyanide-based ligands have been used as possible DNA inter­calators (Li et al., 2009; Agorastos et al., 2007).

Structural commentary  

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, [Re(C10H6NO2)(C7H11N)(CO)3], is shown in Fig. 1. The ReI atom is six-coordinated by four C, one N and one O atoms in a distorted octa­hedral coordination sphere. The carbonyl C atoms are in a facial arrangement, with distances in the range 1.903 (8)–1.960 (8) Å, resulting in a cis arrangement of the bi- and monodentate ligands. The longest distance involving the carbonyl ligands [1.960 (8) Å; Re—C11] corresponds to the ligand trans to the isocyanide cyclo­hexyl ligand, defining the axial direction of the octa­hedral complex. The ReI atom almost lies in the equatorial plane (deviation, 0.006 Å) defined by the C12, C13, O1 and N1 atoms. The bite angle (N1—Re—O1) of the chelating ligand, corresponding to a five-membered ring, has a typical value of 75.2 (2)° (Lyczko et al., 2015). The Re—N1 and Re—O1 bond lengths are 2.273 (5) and 2.149 (5) Å, respectively. The isocyanide carbon atom, C14, is at a distance of 2.107 (8) Å from the metal site. All these values are close to those of a complex with the same core (Agorastos et al., 2007). The isocyanide group is oriented within the equatorial plane of the cyclo­hexyl ring which exhibits a chair conformation.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure and atom-labelling scheme of the title compound. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

Supra­molecular features  

Figs. 2 and 3 show the supra­molecular inter­actions of each complex mol­ecule with its neighbours. Displaced π–π inter­actions between the phenyl and pyridine rings of quinaldate ligands of neighbouring complexes are present, with a Cg1⋯Cg2i distance of 3.650 Å [Cg1 and Cg2 are the centroids of the (C5–C10) and (N1,C2,C3,C4,C5,C10) rings, respectively; symmetry code: (i): 4 − x, 1 − y, 2 − z]. These inter­actions help to consolidate the stacking of the mol­ecules into rods parallel to [001] (Figs. 3 and 4). Weak inter­molecular C—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding inter­actions (Table 1), including supra­molecular Inline graphic(7) loops (C20—H20A⋯O1 and C15—H15⋯O2) join neighbouring rods into sheets parallel to (010) (Fig. 4). An additional type of inter­actions, viz. short van der Waals forces of the C—H⋯H—C type (Sankolli et al., 2015), is realized through C18—H18⋯H18—C18 contacts. The cyclo­hexyl end of the isocyanide ligands is hanging above and below the sheets of mol­ecules (Figs. 3 and 4), creating a perhydrogenated outer wall (Sankolli et al., 2015) at both sides of the layers. Such layers are stacked along [010] (through centres of symmetry located at b/2) and inter­act through the aforementioned C—H⋯H—C contacts (Fig. 5).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Inter­molecular inter­actions of the title complex with its neighbours. π–π inter­actions, weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and short van der Waals contacts are shown with green, orange and turquoise dashed lines, respectively. [Symmetry codes: (′) x + 1, y, z; (′′) 1 + x, Inline graphic − y, −Inline graphic + z; (′′′) 4 − x,1 − y, 2 − z.]

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A rod of complexes extending parallel to [001] through π–π inter­actions. The colour code is as in Fig. 2.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Sheet of complexes arranged parallel to (010) showing π–π and weak C—H⋯O inter­actions. The colour code is as in Fig. 2.

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C20—H20A⋯O1i 0.99 2.61 3.260 (10) 123
C15—H15⋯O2i 0.99 2.52 3.365 142
C7—H7⋯O2ii 0.99 2.37 3.133 137

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Stack of layers along [010] with C—H⋯H—C van der Waals contacts (light-blue dashed lines) developed among them, shown along the opposite [20Inline graphic] direction (see Fig. 4).

Hirshfeld surface analysis  

The packing of the complexes in the structure was further investigated with Hirshfeld surface analysis using the Crystal Explorer package (Wolff et al., 2012). The d norm and curvedness (Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009) surface mappings are presented in Fig. 6 a, 6b and 6c, respectively. All C—H⋯O and C—H⋯H—C contacts are recognized on the d norm mapped surface as deep-red depression areas in Fig. 6 a and 6b, which represent two different upper views of the complex. Arrows at these figures indicate the specific type of contacts at each red point. A bottom view of the surface mapped with curvedness (Fig. 6 c) shows broad, relatively flat regions (indicated by letter A) characteristic of planar stacking of complexes (Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009), corresponding to the π–π inter­actions. In the fingerprint plot (Rohl et al., 2008), shown in Fig. 6 d, the points indicated by 1, 2A & 2B, 3A & 3B and 4 correspond to H⋯H, H⋯O, C⋯H and C⋯C inter­actions with relative contributions of 25.1, 44.2, 18.1 and 4.3%, respectively. These types of inter­actions add to 91.7% of the inter­molecular contacts of the Hirshfeld surface area. The remaining contributions (8.3%) correspond to N⋯H (2.1%), O⋯C (2.8%) and other less-important inter­actions (<1%).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Views of Hirshfeld surfaces mapped with d norm (a)/(b), curvedness (c) properties and (d) fingerprint plots for the title complex. d e and d i are the distances to the nearest atom centre exterior and inter­ior to the surface. 1, 2, 3 and 4 indicate H⋯H, H⋯O, C⋯H and C⋯C inter­actions, and A and B stand for acceptor and donor atoms, respectively.

NMR investigation  

In the solution NMR spectra of the complex, both the quinaldate and iso­cyano­cyclo­hexane moieties are distinguishable. Coordination by the quinaldate is evident from the downfield shifts of all its protons ranging from 0.10 to 0.44 p.p.m. compared to free quinaldic acid under the same conditions (our data). Downfield shifts are also recorded for most of the C atoms of quinaldic acid, the most notable one (4.8 p.p.m.) being the one of the carboxyl­ate carbonyl carbon. For the iso­cyano­cyclo­hexane moiety, downfield shifts are recorded for the C atom (2.7 p.p.m.) bearing the isocyanide group and for its H atom (0.31 p.p.m.) compared to the free ligand. The most characteristic sign of coordination of the iso­cyano­cyclo­hexane moiety is the sizable upfield shift of the isocyanide C atom of 15.5 p.p.m., attributed to an increased carbene character upon coordination (Stephany et al., 1974; Sagnou et al., 2010, 2011). In the 13C NMR spectrum of the complex, one of the carbonyl ligands of the Re(CO)3 + core appears shielded (by 2.8 p.p.m. on average) compared to the other two, an observation that may also be attributed to the trans effect of the isocyanide ligand.

Database survey  

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Groom & Allen, 2014) has revealed eight tricarbonyl complexes in facial arrangement and different N,O-bidentate ligands with a pyridine carboxyl­ato-2 group at the binding side of the corresponding ligand. The N,O-binding sites together with the two carbonyl groups trans to N and O atoms define an equatorial plane, and the third together with the monodentate ligand define the axial position. The Re—C bond lengths of axial carbonyl ligands (1.883–1.922 Å) trans to the monodentate ligand have values equal or smaller than the equatorial ones (1.892–1.945 Å) when the ligand is an aqua ligand (Schutte & Visser, 2008; Mundwiler et al., 2004). The carbonyl Re—C bond lengths are inter­mediate (1.914–1.917 Å) between the values of the Re—C bonds trans to the equatorial O (1.886–1.916 Å) and N (1.921–1.926 Å) atoms, if the trans ligand is bonded to Re through an N atom (Benny et al., 2009; Mundwiler et al., 2004). Finally, the respective bond length, 1.947 Å, is longer than both Re—C bonds trans to equatorial O (1.912 Å) and N (1.914 Å) atoms if the Re atom is bonded to a P atom of a phosphine ligand (Hayes et al., 2014). In the case of the isocyanide group trans to the axial Re—C bond (Agorastos et al., 2007), the results are indistinct. In one case (XIDPUW), the axial bond length (1.756 Å) is shorter than the equatorial one (1.849 Å trans to O and 1.901 Å trans to N) whereas in the other case (XIDQAD), the corresponding length (1.914 Å) is longer than the equatorial one (1.495 Å trans to O and 1.885 Å trans to N). In the present structure, the Re—C11 bond (1.960 Å), is longer than the Re—C13 (1.903 Å, trans to O) and Re—C12 (1.912 Å, trans to N) bonds. This result is supported by the NMR analysis and is indicative of the structural trans effect (Coe & Glenwright, 2000).

Synthesis and crystallization  

To a stirred solution of quinaldic acid (17.3 mg, 0.1 mmol) in 5 ml methanol, a solution of [NEt4]2[ReBr3(CO)3] (77 mg, 0.1 mmol) in 5 ml methanol was added. The mixture was heated at 333 K, and after 30 min a solution of cyclo­hexyl isocyanide (0.1 mmol) in 3 ml methanol was added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h and the reaction progress was monitored by HPLC. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the solid residue was recrystallized from di­chloro­methane/hexane. The resulting solid was redissolved in a minimum volume of di­chloro­methane, layered with hexane and left to stand at room temperature. After a few days crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were isolated (yield: 44 mg, 80%). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6, p.p.m.): 8.93 (1H), 8.58 (1H), 8.32 (1H), 8.28 (1H), 8.18 (1H), 7.94 (1H), 4.08 (1H), 1.50 (2H), 1.40 (2H), 1.13(2H), 1.08 (2H), 0.88 (2H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d 6, p.p.m.): 193.65, 193.12, 190.54, 172.06, 152.63, 146.23, 142.09, 138.85, 133.04, 130.47, 129.67, 129.61, 127.78, 122.78, 53.72, 30.48, 23.91, 20.70.

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. C-bound H atoms were placed in idealized positions and refined using a riding model with C—H = 0.95 Å (aromatic H atoms), C—H = 0.99 Å (methyl­ene H atoms), and with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C).

Table 2. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula [Re(C10H6NO2)(C7H11N)(CO)3]
M r 551.55
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K) 170
a, b, c (Å) 7.1529 (1), 29.5703 (5), 9.6309 (2)
β (°) 105.572 (1)
V3) 1962.29 (6)
Z 4
Radiation type Cu Kα
μ (mm−1) 12.41
Crystal size (mm) 0.49 × 0.12 × 0.04
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Rigaku R-AXIS SPIDER IPDS
Absorption correction Multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku 2005)
T min, T max 0.374, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 21436, 3283, 2723
R int 0.069
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.588
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.038, 0.102, 1.17
No. of reflections 3283
No. of parameters 253
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 1.30, −1.43

Computer programs: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005), SHELXS97 and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), DIAMOND (Crystal Impact, 2012) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016002206/wm5257sup1.cif

e-72-00358-sup1.cif (759.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016002206/wm5257Isup2.hkl

e-72-00358-Isup2.hkl (262.2KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 1451823

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

CT would like to thank the State Scholarships Foundation (IKY) in Greece for financial support during his postgraduate studies in the framework of ‘IKY fellowships Excellence for postgraduate studies in Greece – Siemens program’.

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

[Re(C10H6NO2)(C7H11N)(CO)3] F(000) = 1064
Mr = 551.55 Dx = 1.867 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
a = 7.1529 (1) Å Cell parameters from 17036 reflections
b = 29.5703 (5) Å θ = 6.6–71.9°
c = 9.6309 (2) Å µ = 12.41 mm1
β = 105.572 (1)° T = 170 K
V = 1962.29 (6) Å3 Parallelepiped, colorless
Z = 4 0.49 × 0.12 × 0.04 mm

Data collection

Rigaku R-AXIS SPIDER IPDS diffractometer 2723 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.069
θ scans θmax = 65.0°, θmin = 6.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku 2005) h = −8→8
Tmin = 0.374, Tmax = 1.000 k = −33→27
21436 measured reflections l = −11→11
3283 independent reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 0 restraints
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.102 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0314P)2 + 5.6979P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.17 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
3283 reflections Δρmax = 1.30 e Å3
253 parameters Δρmin = −1.43 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Re 0.92831 (4) 0.37585 (2) 0.37372 (3) 0.03094 (14)
N1 0.9723 (7) 0.30250 (18) 0.4300 (5) 0.0284 (12)
O1 0.7817 (7) 0.36522 (17) 0.5387 (5) 0.0416 (12)
O2 0.6499 (7) 0.31296 (18) 0.6478 (5) 0.0484 (13)
C1 0.7486 (9) 0.3239 (2) 0.5673 (7) 0.0355 (16)
C2 0.8488 (9) 0.2879 (2) 0.5021 (6) 0.0301 (14)
C3 0.8153 (10) 0.2429 (2) 0.5234 (7) 0.0346 (15)
H3 0.7263 0.2344 0.5762 0.042*
C4 0.9110 (9) 0.2111 (2) 0.4680 (7) 0.0364 (16)
H4 0.8825 0.1799 0.4757 0.044*
C5 1.0531 (9) 0.2242 (2) 0.3988 (7) 0.0350 (16)
C6 1.1665 (10) 0.1931 (2) 0.3467 (7) 0.0413 (17)
H6 1.1444 0.1616 0.3549 0.050*
C7 1.3075 (10) 0.2069 (3) 0.2848 (7) 0.0421 (18)
H7 1.3827 0.1855 0.2496 0.051*
C8 1.3385 (10) 0.2532 (2) 0.2742 (7) 0.0395 (17)
H8 1.4385 0.2629 0.2332 0.047*
C9 1.2302 (9) 0.2851 (2) 0.3207 (6) 0.0344 (15)
H9 1.2542 0.3164 0.3112 0.041*
C10 1.0834 (8) 0.2709 (2) 0.3826 (6) 0.0279 (14)
C11 0.6948 (11) 0.3602 (2) 0.2213 (8) 0.0386 (16)
O3 0.5615 (7) 0.3509 (2) 0.1301 (6) 0.0588 (16)
C12 0.8592 (10) 0.4384 (3) 0.3514 (8) 0.0419 (17)
O4 0.8223 (8) 0.47647 (18) 0.3391 (6) 0.0549 (14)
C13 1.0602 (10) 0.3846 (2) 0.2285 (8) 0.0381 (17)
O5 1.1396 (8) 0.39159 (19) 0.1404 (6) 0.0529 (13)
C14 1.1806 (11) 0.3915 (2) 0.5378 (8) 0.0381 (16)
N2 1.3213 (8) 0.40084 (19) 0.6200 (6) 0.0353 (13)
C15 1.5026 (9) 0.4170 (2) 0.7131 (7) 0.0365 (16)
H15 1.5983 0.3916 0.7321 0.044*
C16 1.4738 (12) 0.4329 (3) 0.8551 (7) 0.057 (2)
H16A 1.4335 0.4071 0.9061 0.068*
H16B 1.3704 0.4561 0.8376 0.068*
C17 1.6631 (17) 0.4527 (4) 0.9473 (10) 0.098 (4)
H17A 1.6427 0.4645 1.0384 0.117*
H17B 1.7629 0.4287 0.9717 0.117*
C18 1.7339 (18) 0.4906 (4) 0.8689 (17) 0.133 (6)
H18A 1.6382 0.5155 0.8505 0.160*
H18B 1.8582 0.5024 0.9302 0.160*
C19 1.7628 (14) 0.4744 (4) 0.7288 (17) 0.111 (5)
H19A 1.8662 0.4512 0.7479 0.133*
H19B 1.8056 0.5001 0.6788 0.133*
C20 1.5778 (10) 0.4546 (3) 0.6321 (9) 0.055 (2)
H20A 1.6038 0.4421 0.5437 0.066*
H20B 1.4784 0.4786 0.6032 0.066*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Re 0.0284 (2) 0.0315 (2) 0.0323 (2) 0.00254 (11) 0.00704 (15) 0.00250 (11)
N1 0.025 (3) 0.034 (3) 0.024 (3) 0.003 (2) 0.003 (2) 0.002 (2)
O1 0.044 (3) 0.041 (3) 0.046 (3) 0.011 (2) 0.022 (2) 0.004 (2)
O2 0.050 (3) 0.055 (3) 0.051 (3) 0.007 (3) 0.032 (3) 0.007 (3)
C1 0.031 (4) 0.037 (4) 0.036 (4) 0.007 (3) 0.006 (3) −0.002 (3)
C2 0.023 (3) 0.035 (4) 0.029 (3) 0.002 (3) 0.001 (3) −0.001 (3)
C3 0.038 (4) 0.040 (4) 0.029 (3) 0.001 (3) 0.015 (3) 0.003 (3)
C4 0.037 (4) 0.028 (4) 0.041 (4) −0.001 (3) 0.007 (3) 0.002 (3)
C5 0.027 (3) 0.040 (4) 0.034 (4) 0.002 (3) −0.001 (3) −0.005 (3)
C6 0.044 (4) 0.029 (4) 0.048 (4) 0.007 (3) 0.007 (3) −0.005 (3)
C7 0.033 (4) 0.049 (5) 0.046 (4) 0.007 (3) 0.014 (3) −0.005 (4)
C8 0.031 (4) 0.049 (5) 0.040 (4) 0.005 (3) 0.012 (3) −0.004 (3)
C9 0.027 (3) 0.044 (4) 0.032 (3) 0.002 (3) 0.008 (3) 0.006 (3)
C10 0.023 (3) 0.034 (4) 0.023 (3) 0.005 (3) −0.001 (3) 0.001 (3)
C11 0.047 (4) 0.031 (4) 0.042 (4) 0.002 (3) 0.019 (4) 0.006 (3)
O3 0.038 (3) 0.059 (4) 0.066 (4) −0.003 (3) −0.010 (3) 0.001 (3)
C12 0.032 (4) 0.049 (5) 0.044 (4) −0.006 (4) 0.008 (3) −0.001 (4)
O4 0.063 (4) 0.036 (3) 0.067 (4) 0.010 (3) 0.021 (3) 0.013 (3)
C13 0.036 (4) 0.033 (4) 0.042 (4) 0.001 (3) 0.004 (4) 0.004 (3)
O5 0.052 (3) 0.057 (4) 0.055 (3) −0.004 (3) 0.024 (3) 0.008 (3)
C14 0.042 (4) 0.028 (4) 0.044 (4) 0.004 (3) 0.012 (4) 0.001 (3)
N2 0.039 (3) 0.036 (3) 0.032 (3) −0.003 (3) 0.009 (3) −0.002 (2)
C15 0.034 (4) 0.035 (4) 0.038 (4) 0.003 (3) 0.005 (3) −0.004 (3)
C16 0.077 (6) 0.055 (6) 0.029 (4) 0.013 (5) −0.002 (4) −0.005 (4)
C17 0.123 (9) 0.068 (7) 0.064 (6) 0.021 (7) −0.042 (6) −0.025 (5)
C18 0.093 (9) 0.073 (9) 0.172 (14) −0.017 (7) −0.072 (9) −0.035 (9)
C19 0.051 (6) 0.066 (8) 0.203 (15) −0.020 (5) 0.009 (8) 0.001 (9)
C20 0.047 (5) 0.037 (5) 0.085 (7) −0.005 (3) 0.023 (5) 0.012 (4)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Re—C13 1.903 (8) C9—C10 1.404 (8)
Re—C12 1.912 (8) C9—H9 0.9500
Re—C11 1.960 (8) C11—O3 1.144 (8)
Re—C14 2.107 (8) C12—O4 1.155 (8)
Re—O1 2.149 (5) C13—O5 1.159 (8)
Re—N1 2.237 (5) C14—N2 1.135 (8)
N1—C2 1.333 (8) N2—C15 1.446 (8)
N1—C10 1.380 (7) C15—C16 1.512 (9)
O1—C1 1.289 (8) C15—C20 1.537 (9)
O2—C1 1.224 (8) C15—H15 1.0000
C1—C2 1.510 (9) C16—C17 1.523 (12)
C2—C3 1.376 (9) C16—H16A 0.9900
C3—C4 1.356 (9) C16—H16B 0.9900
C3—H3 0.9500 C17—C18 1.512 (17)
C4—C5 1.411 (9) C17—H17A 0.9900
C4—H4 0.9500 C17—H17B 0.9900
C5—C6 1.405 (9) C18—C19 1.496 (17)
C5—C10 1.413 (9) C18—H18A 0.9900
C6—C7 1.365 (9) C18—H18B 0.9900
C6—H6 0.9500 C19—C20 1.516 (13)
C7—C8 1.394 (10) C19—H19A 0.9900
C7—H7 0.9500 C19—H19B 0.9900
C8—C9 1.371 (9) C20—H20A 0.9900
C8—H8 0.9500 C20—H20B 0.9900
C13—Re—C12 87.2 (3) C10—C9—H9 120.5
C13—Re—C11 88.4 (3) N1—C10—C9 120.1 (6)
C12—Re—C11 90.1 (3) N1—C10—C5 120.4 (6)
C13—Re—C14 91.6 (3) C9—C10—C5 119.6 (6)
C12—Re—C14 90.9 (3) O3—C11—Re 178.3 (6)
C11—Re—C14 179.1 (3) O4—C12—Re 178.3 (7)
C13—Re—O1 179.2 (2) O5—C13—Re 177.4 (6)
C12—Re—O1 93.5 (2) N2—C14—Re 175.9 (6)
C11—Re—O1 91.8 (2) C14—N2—C15 173.2 (7)
C14—Re—O1 88.1 (2) N2—C15—C16 110.3 (6)
C13—Re—N1 104.1 (2) N2—C15—C20 107.6 (5)
C12—Re—N1 168.7 (2) C16—C15—C20 112.7 (6)
C11—Re—N1 89.4 (2) N2—C15—H15 108.7
C14—Re—N1 89.7 (2) C16—C15—H15 108.7
O1—Re—N1 75.16 (18) C20—C15—H15 108.7
C2—N1—C10 118.3 (5) C15—C16—C17 109.4 (8)
C2—N1—Re 111.7 (4) C15—C16—H16A 109.8
C10—N1—Re 129.2 (4) C17—C16—H16A 109.8
C1—O1—Re 116.8 (4) C15—C16—H16B 109.8
O2—C1—O1 123.8 (6) C17—C16—H16B 109.8
O2—C1—C2 119.8 (6) H16A—C16—H16B 108.2
O1—C1—C2 116.4 (6) C18—C17—C16 111.0 (8)
N1—C2—C3 123.8 (6) C18—C17—H17A 109.4
N1—C2—C1 116.4 (6) C16—C17—H17A 109.4
C3—C2—C1 119.8 (6) C18—C17—H17B 109.4
C4—C3—C2 119.1 (6) C16—C17—H17B 109.4
C4—C3—H3 120.4 H17A—C17—H17B 108.0
C2—C3—H3 120.4 C19—C18—C17 111.2 (10)
C3—C4—C5 119.8 (6) C19—C18—H18A 109.4
C3—C4—H4 120.1 C17—C18—H18A 109.4
C5—C4—H4 120.1 C19—C18—H18B 109.4
C6—C5—C4 123.1 (7) C17—C18—H18B 109.4
C6—C5—C10 118.7 (6) H18A—C18—H18B 108.0
C4—C5—C10 118.2 (6) C18—C19—C20 111.6 (9)
C7—C6—C5 121.7 (7) C18—C19—H19A 109.3
C7—C6—H6 119.2 C20—C19—H19A 109.3
C5—C6—H6 119.2 C18—C19—H19B 109.3
C6—C7—C8 118.4 (7) C20—C19—H19B 109.3
C6—C7—H7 120.8 H19A—C19—H19B 108.0
C8—C7—H7 120.8 C19—C20—C15 109.5 (8)
C9—C8—C7 122.6 (7) C19—C20—H20A 109.8
C9—C8—H8 118.7 C15—C20—H20A 109.8
C7—C8—H8 118.7 C19—C20—H20B 109.8
C8—C9—C10 119.0 (7) C15—C20—H20B 109.8
C8—C9—H9 120.5 H20A—C20—H20B 108.2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C20—H20A···O1i 0.99 2.61 3.260 (10) 123
C15—H15···O2i 0.99 2.52 3.365 142
C7—H7···O2ii 0.99 2.37 3.133 137

Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y, z; (ii) x+1, −y+1/2, z−1/2.

References

  1. Agorastos, N., Borsig, L., Renard, A., Antoni, P., Viola, G., Spingler, B., Kurz, P. & Alberto, R. (2007). Chem. Eur. J. 13, 3842–3852. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Benny, P. D., Fugate, G. A., Morley, J. E., Twamley, B. & Trabue, S. (2009). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 362, 1289–1294.
  3. Bertrand, H. C., Clède, S., Guillot, R., Lambert, F. & Policar, C. (2014). Inorg. Chem. 53, 6204–6223. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Bodei, L., Lam, M., Chiesa, C., Flux, G., Brans, B., Chiti, A. & Giammarile, F. (2008). Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging, 35, 1934–1940. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Coe, B. J. & Glenwright, S. J. (2000). Coord. Chem. Rev. 203, 5–80.
  6. Crystal Impact (2012). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  7. Groom, C. R. & Allen, F. H. (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 662–671. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Hayes, T. R., Kasten, B. B., Barnes, C. L. & Benny, P. D. (2014). Dalton Trans. 43, 6998–7001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. Leodinova, A. & Gasser, G. (2014). Chem. Biol. 9, 2180–2193. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Li, W., Zhang, Z.-W., Wang, S.-X., Ren, S.-M. & Jiang, T. (2009). Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 74, 80–86. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Lyczko, K., Lyczko, M. & Mieczkowski, J. (2015). Polyhedron, 87, 122–134.
  12. Mundwiler, S., Kündig, M., Ortner, K. & Alberto, R. (2004). Dalton Trans. pp. 1320–1328. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear. Rigaku/MSC, The Woodlands, Texas, USA.
  14. Rohl, A. L., Moret, M., Kaminsky, W., Claborn, K., McKinnon, J. J. & Kahr, B. (2008). Cryst. Growth Des. 8, 4517–4525.
  15. Sagnou, M., Benaki, D., Triantis, C., Tsotakos, T., Psycharis, V., Raptopoulou, C. P., Pirmettis, I., Papadopoulos, M. & Pelecanou, M. (2011). Inorg. Chem. 50, 1295–1303. [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. Sagnou, M., Tsoukalas, C., Triantis, C., Raptopoulou, C. P., Terzis, A., Pirmettis, I., Pelecanou, M. & Papadopoulos, M. (2010). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 363, 1649–1653.
  17. Sankolli, R., Hauser, J., Row, T. N. G. & Hulliger, J. (2015). Acta Cryst. E71, 1328–1331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  18. Schneider, P., Farahati, J. & Reiners, C. (2005). J. Nucl. Med. 46 Suppl 1, 48S-54S. [PubMed]
  19. Schutte, M. & Visser, H. G. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, m1226–m1227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  20. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  21. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  22. Spackman, M. A. & Jayatilaka, D. (2009). CrystEngComm, 11, 19–32.
  23. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  24. Stephany, R. W., de Bie, M. J. A. & Drenth, W. (1974). Org. Magn. Reson. 6, 45–47.
  25. Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., McKinnon, J. J., Turner, M. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2012). CrystalExplorer. The University of Western Australia, Australia.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016002206/wm5257sup1.cif

e-72-00358-sup1.cif (759.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016002206/wm5257Isup2.hkl

e-72-00358-Isup2.hkl (262.2KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 1451823

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES