Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2016 Feb 13;72(Pt 3):328–330. doi: 10.1107/S2056989016002449

Crystal structure of dimethyl 4,4′-di­meth­oxy­biphenyl-3,3′-di­carboxyl­ate

Fredrik Lundvall a,*, Pascal D C Dietzel b, Helmer Fjellvåg a
PMCID: PMC4778817  PMID: 27006799

The title compound is an inter­mediate in the synthesis of linkers for coordination polymers. Centrosymmetric mol­ecules are packed along the a axis to form corrugated layers parallel to the ac plane.

Keywords: crystal structure, inter­mediate compound for organic linkers in MOF synthesis, centrosymmetric mol­ecule

Abstract

In the title compound, C18H18O6, the benzene rings are coplanar due to the centrosymmetric nature of the mol­ecule, with an inversion centre located at the midpoint of the C—C bond between the two rings. Consequently, the methyl carboxyl­ate substituents are oriented in a trans fashion with regards to the bond between the benzene rings. The methyl carboxyl­ate and meth­oxy substituents are rotated slightly out of plane relative to their parent benzene rings, with dihedral and torsion angles of 18.52 (8) and −5.22 (15)°, respectively. The shortest O⋯H contact between neighbouring mol­ecules is about 2.5 Å. Although some structure-directing contributions from C—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding inter­actions are possible, the crystal packing seems primarily directed by weak van der Waals forces.

Chemical context  

The title compound is an inter­mediate in the synthesis of 4,4′-di­meth­oxy­biphenyl-3,3′-bi­phenyldi­carb­oxy­lic acid, an organic linker for use in the synthesis of coordination polymers (Lundvall et al., 2016). The title compound, C18H18O6, has previously been reported (Wang et al., 2009; Kar et al., 2009), however, its crystal structure was undetermined up until now.graphic file with name e-72-00328-scheme1.jpg

Structural commentary  

The asymmetric unit of the title compound comprises one half of the mol­ecule, with an inversion centre located at the midpoint of the benzene–benzene bond (Fig. 1). The benzene rings are coplanar due to symmetry. This is somewhat unexpected since a slight torsion between the two rings is a common feature in biphenyl compounds. The methyl carb­oxyl­ate substituents are oriented trans relative to the benzene–benzene bond, and the plane of the substituent makes a dihedral angle of 18.52 (8)° relative to the parent benzene ring. The meth­oxy substituent is nearly coplanar with the parent benzene ring, and a torsion angle C5—C4—O1—C9 of only −5.22 (15)° is observed. The methyl groups of the methyl carboxyl­ate and meth­oxy substituents are oriented away from each other to accommodate the steric demands of these groups.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound with atom labels and 50% probability displacement ellipsoids. Non-labelled atoms are generated by the symmetry code (−x + Inline graphic, −y + Inline graphic, −z). H atoms have been omitted for clarity.

Supra­molecular features  

The mol­ecules are packed in the unit cell with the axis of the biphenyl scaffolds parallel to each other. The axis of the biphenyl moiety is oriented approximately 20° off the a axis of the unit cell (Fig. 2), and the mol­ecules form corrugated layers extending parallel to the ac plane (Fig. 3). The packing is not directed by strong inter­molecular bonding since the shortest O⋯H contact is about 2.5 Å (Table 1). However, weak C—H⋯O inter­actions between neighbouring mol­ecules seem to have an influence on the crystal packing (Fig. 4).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Packing diagram of the title compound viewed along the b axis.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Packing diagram of the title compound viewed along the a axis. H atoms have been omitted for clarity.

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C9—H9C⋯O1i 0.98 2.55 3.4759 (15) 158
C8—H8B⋯O3ii 0.98 2.50 3.3407 (15) 144

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Graphical representation of the shortest inter­molecular O⋯H contacts, illustrated as dashed blue lines.

Synthesis and crystallization  

The title compound was synthesized by a slightly modified procedure of the method described by Wang et al. (2009). Synthetic details are given in the Supporting Information of our recent contribution (Lundvall et al., 2016). Single crystals suitable for structure determination were obtained by recrystallizing the title compound from chloro­form solution.

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. H atoms were positioned geom­etrically at distances of 0.95 (CH) and 0.98 Å (CH3) and were refined using a riding model with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(CH) and U iso(H)=1.5U eq(CH3).

Table 2. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula C18H18O6
M r 330.32
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K) 105
a, b, c (Å) 28.5800 (14), 4.0632 (2), 14.4806 (7)
β (°) 115.100 (1)
V3) 1522.78 (13)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.11
Crystal size (mm) 0.56 × 0.29 × 0.22
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker PHOTON CCD
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007)
T min, T max 0.602, 0.746
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 17902, 2053, 1819
R int 0.037
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.685
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.038, 0.109, 1.10
No. of reflections 2053
No. of parameters 111
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.41, −0.24

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2007), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), WinGX (Farrugia, 2012), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2004), ChemBioDraw (Cambridge Soft, 2009) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, New_Global_Publ_Block. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016002449/wm5270sup1.cif

e-72-00328-sup1.cif (635KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016002449/wm5270Isup2.hkl

e-72-00328-Isup2.hkl (165.2KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016002449/wm5270Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 1452330

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge support from the Research Council of Norway (Project No. 190980), the Norwegian national infrastructure for X-ray diffraction and scattering (RECX) and the Department of Chemistry, UiO.

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

C18H18O6 F(000) = 696
Mr = 330.32 Dx = 1.441 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 28.5800 (14) Å Cell parameters from 9942 reflections
b = 4.0632 (2) Å θ = 2.8–29.1°
c = 14.4806 (7) Å µ = 0.11 mm1
β = 115.100 (1)° T = 105 K
V = 1522.78 (13) Å3 Needle, colourless
Z = 4 0.56 × 0.29 × 0.22 mm

Data collection

Bruker PHOTON CCD diffractometer 2053 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1819 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.037
ω scans θmax = 29.2°, θmin = 2.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007) h = −38→38
Tmin = 0.602, Tmax = 0.746 k = −5→5
17902 measured reflections l = −19→19

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.109 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.10 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0534P)2 + 1.1903P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2053 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
111 parameters Δρmax = 0.41 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.24 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.22923 (4) 0.2306 (3) 0.01755 (7) 0.0163 (2)
C2 0.17986 (4) 0.3583 (3) −0.03782 (7) 0.0175 (2)
H2 0.1730 0.4703 −0.0998 0.021*
C3 0.14011 (4) 0.3300 (3) −0.00694 (7) 0.0170 (2)
C4 0.14924 (4) 0.1625 (3) 0.08424 (8) 0.0170 (2)
C5 0.19832 (4) 0.0299 (3) 0.14041 (8) 0.0193 (2)
H5 0.2052 −0.0851 0.2020 0.023*
C6 0.23708 (4) 0.0637 (3) 0.10753 (8) 0.0193 (2)
H6 0.2701 −0.0293 0.1473 0.023*
C7 0.09039 (4) 0.4858 (3) −0.07720 (8) 0.0192 (2)
C8 0.01027 (4) 0.7077 (3) −0.10223 (9) 0.0256 (3)
H8A −0.0111 0.7454 −0.0653 0.038*
H8B −0.0086 0.5685 −0.1618 0.038*
H8C 0.0184 0.9191 −0.1246 0.038*
C9 0.11816 (5) −0.0599 (3) 0.20034 (8) 0.0229 (2)
H9A 0.0868 −0.0586 0.2121 0.034*
H9B 0.1470 0.0309 0.2601 0.034*
H9C 0.1262 −0.2863 0.1888 0.034*
O1 0.10999 (3) 0.1361 (2) 0.11283 (6) 0.02064 (19)
O2 0.05778 (3) 0.5450 (2) −0.03563 (6) 0.0232 (2)
O3 0.08127 (3) 0.5572 (3) −0.16406 (7) 0.0354 (3)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C1 0.0173 (5) 0.0161 (5) 0.0141 (4) −0.0009 (4) 0.0053 (4) −0.0023 (4)
C2 0.0182 (5) 0.0194 (5) 0.0133 (4) −0.0012 (4) 0.0051 (4) −0.0004 (4)
C3 0.0162 (4) 0.0181 (5) 0.0142 (4) −0.0010 (4) 0.0040 (4) −0.0018 (4)
C4 0.0187 (5) 0.0168 (5) 0.0156 (4) −0.0020 (4) 0.0072 (4) −0.0027 (4)
C5 0.0216 (5) 0.0201 (5) 0.0153 (4) 0.0013 (4) 0.0071 (4) 0.0023 (4)
C6 0.0186 (5) 0.0208 (5) 0.0164 (5) 0.0025 (4) 0.0054 (4) 0.0008 (4)
C7 0.0165 (5) 0.0223 (5) 0.0170 (5) −0.0015 (4) 0.0055 (4) 0.0001 (4)
C8 0.0185 (5) 0.0324 (6) 0.0240 (5) 0.0064 (5) 0.0073 (4) 0.0036 (5)
C9 0.0288 (6) 0.0234 (6) 0.0203 (5) 0.0022 (4) 0.0141 (4) 0.0036 (4)
O1 0.0207 (4) 0.0247 (4) 0.0184 (4) 0.0013 (3) 0.0101 (3) 0.0038 (3)
O2 0.0193 (4) 0.0323 (5) 0.0172 (4) 0.0060 (3) 0.0068 (3) 0.0015 (3)
O3 0.0223 (4) 0.0622 (7) 0.0219 (4) 0.0115 (4) 0.0096 (3) 0.0158 (4)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C1—C2 1.3940 (14) C6—H6 0.9500
C1—C6 1.3998 (14) C7—O3 1.2067 (14)
C1—C1i 1.4846 (19) C7—O2 1.3285 (13)
C2—C3 1.3909 (14) C8—O2 1.4490 (13)
C2—H2 0.9500 C8—H8A 0.9800
C3—C4 1.4080 (14) C8—H8B 0.9800
C3—C7 1.4928 (14) C8—H8C 0.9800
C4—O1 1.3549 (12) C9—O1 1.4293 (13)
C4—C5 1.3971 (15) C9—H9A 0.9800
C5—C6 1.3859 (15) C9—H9B 0.9800
C5—H5 0.9500 C9—H9C 0.9800
C2—C1—C6 116.04 (9) O3—C7—O2 123.09 (10)
C2—C1—C1i 121.65 (11) O3—C7—C3 122.32 (10)
C6—C1—C1i 122.31 (11) O2—C7—C3 114.58 (9)
C3—C2—C1 123.36 (9) O2—C8—H8A 109.5
C3—C2—H2 118.3 O2—C8—H8B 109.5
C1—C2—H2 118.3 H8A—C8—H8B 109.5
C2—C3—C4 119.32 (9) O2—C8—H8C 109.5
C2—C3—C7 114.66 (9) H8A—C8—H8C 109.5
C4—C3—C7 126.03 (9) H8B—C8—H8C 109.5
O1—C4—C5 123.27 (9) O1—C9—H9A 109.5
O1—C4—C3 118.48 (9) O1—C9—H9B 109.5
C5—C4—C3 118.25 (10) H9A—C9—H9B 109.5
C6—C5—C4 120.87 (10) O1—C9—H9C 109.5
C6—C5—H5 119.6 H9A—C9—H9C 109.5
C4—C5—H5 119.6 H9B—C9—H9C 109.5
C5—C6—C1 122.15 (10) C4—O1—C9 118.03 (8)
C5—C6—H6 118.9 C7—O2—C8 114.87 (9)
C1—C6—H6 118.9
C6—C1—C2—C3 0.89 (16) C2—C1—C6—C5 −0.64 (16)
C1i—C1—C2—C3 −179.29 (11) C1i—C1—C6—C5 179.55 (12)
C1—C2—C3—C4 −0.55 (16) C2—C3—C7—O3 17.33 (16)
C1—C2—C3—C7 179.71 (10) C4—C3—C7—O3 −162.39 (12)
C2—C3—C4—O1 −179.68 (9) C2—C3—C7—O2 −161.30 (10)
C7—C3—C4—O1 0.03 (16) C4—C3—C7—O2 18.97 (16)
C2—C3—C4—C5 −0.08 (15) C5—C4—O1—C9 −5.22 (15)
C7—C3—C4—C5 179.63 (10) C3—C4—O1—C9 174.36 (10)
O1—C4—C5—C6 179.90 (10) O3—C7—O2—C8 −0.89 (17)
C3—C4—C5—C6 0.32 (16) C3—C7—O2—C8 177.74 (10)
C4—C5—C6—C1 0.05 (17) C2—C1—C1i—C6i 0.2 (2)

Symmetry code: (i) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C9—H9C···O1ii 0.98 2.55 3.4759 (15) 158
C8—H8B···O3iii 0.98 2.50 3.3407 (15) 144

Symmetry codes: (ii) x, y−1, z; (iii) −x, y, −z−1/2.

References

  1. Brandenburg, K. (2004). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  2. Bruker (2007). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Cambridge Soft (2009). ChemBioDraw Ultra. Cambridge Soft Corporation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  4. Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854.
  5. Kar, A., Mangu, N., Kaiser, H. M. & Tse, M. K. (2009). J. Organomet. Chem. 694, 524–537.
  6. Lundvall, F., Vajeeston, P., Wragg, D. S., Dietzel, P. D. C. & Fjellvåg, H. (2016). Cryst. Growth Des. 16, 339–346.
  7. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  9. Wang, L., Xiao, Z.-Y., Hou, J.-L., Wang, G.-T., Jiang, X.-K. & Li, Z. (2009). Tetrahedron, 65, 10544–10551.
  10. Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, New_Global_Publ_Block. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016002449/wm5270sup1.cif

e-72-00328-sup1.cif (635KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016002449/wm5270Isup2.hkl

e-72-00328-Isup2.hkl (165.2KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016002449/wm5270Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 1452330

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES