Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1974 Jan;27(1):66–69. doi: 10.1136/jcp.27.1.66

Candida precipitins in pregnant women: validity of the test systems used

Valerie C Stanley 1, Rosalinde Hurley 1
PMCID: PMC477989  PMID: 4595207

Abstract

Sera from 200 pregnant women, with symptoms suggestive of vaginitis and harbouring yeast in the vagina, were examined for precipitating antibodies to three antigens of C. albicans, using a gel double diffusion test. A high overall incidence of precipitin-positive sera (47.5%) was found compared with an incidence of 18% in the unselected pregnant population previously studied (Stanley, Hurley, and Carroll 1972).

Using the clinicopathological criteria of Carroll, Hurley, and Stanley (1973), a final aetiological diagnosis of C. albicans mycosis was reached in 75 cases and precipitins were demonstrated in 64%. Forty-eight women harbouring C. albicans responded favourably to a single course of antifungal treatment, and probably had mycotic vaginitis. The incidence of precipitins in this group was 42%. C. albicans was isolated from a further 55 of 62 patients, in whom the incidence of precipitins was 32%.

`Booking' sera were investigated from 50 of the 200 women studied. Sixty-four per cent of women had symptoms of vaginitis at booking and 32% were precipitin positive. Twenty-eight per cent had precipitins on both occasions, and a further 24% acquired candida precipitins during pregnancy.

None of the seven newborn with oral or skin thrush had precipitins to C. albicans.

The results indicate that the detection of precipitating antibodies to C. albicans, particularly to all three of the antigens described in this paper, would be a useful additional criterion in the diagnosis of candida vaginitis, particularly if the vaginitis were persistent, recurrent, or unresponsive to therapy. The sensitivity of the test system used was 64%, and its specificity 87%; as such, the test is valid and may be reasonably useful as a screening procedure.

Full text

PDF
66

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carroll C. J., Hurley R., Stanley V. C. Criteria for diagnosis of candida vulvovaginitis in pregnant women. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1973 Mar;80(3):258–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1973.tb02195.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hurley R., Leask B. G., Faktor J. A., De Fonseka C. I. Incidence and distribution of yeast species and of Trichomonas vaginalis in the vagina of pregnant women. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1973 Mar;80(3):252–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1973.tb02194.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Merritt A. E., Hurley R. Evaluation of sporulation media for yeasts obtained from pathological material. J Med Microbiol. 1972 Feb;5(1):21–30. doi: 10.1099/00222615-5-1-21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Murray I. G., Buckley H. R., Turner G. C. Serological evidence of Candida infection after open-heart surgery. J Med Microbiol. 1969 Nov 4;2(4):463–469. doi: 10.1099/00222615-2-4-463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pepys J., Faux J. A., McCarthy D. S., Hargreave F. E. Candida albicans precipitins in respiratory disease in man. J Allergy. 1968 Jun;41(6):305–318. doi: 10.1016/0021-8707(68)90073-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Stanley V. C., Hurley R., Carroll C. J. Distribution and significance of candida precipitins in sera from pregnant women. J Med Microbiol. 1972 Aug;5(3):313–320. doi: 10.1099/00222615-5-3-313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES