Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Mar 7;6:22755. doi: 10.1038/srep22755

Intercalation-assisted longitudinal unzipping of carbon nanotubes for green and scalable synthesis of graphene nanoribbons

Yan-Sheng Li 1, Jia-Liang Liao 1, Shan-Yu Wang 1, Wei-Hung Chiang 1,a
PMCID: PMC4780102  PMID: 26948486

Abstract

We have demonstrated an effective intercalation of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) for the green and scalable synthesis of graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) using an intercalation-assisted longitudinal unzipping of MWCNTs. The key step is to introduce an intercalation treatment of raw MWCNTs with KNO3 and H2SO4, making it promising to decrease the strong van der Waals attractions in the MWCNTs bundles and between the coaxial graphene walls of CNTs. Systematic micro Raman, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterizations suggest that potassium, nitrate, and sulfate ions play an important role in the CNT intertube and intratube intercalations during the pretreatment. Detailed scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy, XRD, and micro Raman characterizations indicate that the developed methodology possesses the ability to synthesis GNRs effectively with an improved CNT concentration in H2SO4 of 10 mg/ml at 70 °C, which is amenable to industrial-scale production because of the decreased amount of strong acid. Our work provides a scientific understanding how to enhance the GNR formation by accelerating the CNT longitudinal unzipping via suitable molecular intercalation.

Graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) represent a unique form of carbon materials and have spurred intensive interests due to their exceptional physical and chemical properties1,2,3. Recent reports suggest that GNRs are superior materials for many applications such as energy generation and storage4,5, chemical and biosensors5,6, catalysis7,8, nanocomposites9,10, and nanoelectronics11,12. Despite their advantages for many applications, it is still challenging to synthesis GNRs efficiently in a bulk quantity13. Consequently the development of a facile, large-scale, and high-yield production of GNRs will lead to important advances on both fundamental study and innovative applications.

Many methods including longitudinal unzipping of carbon nanotubes (CNTs)14, plasma etching15, metal catalyst assisted cutting16,17, lithium insertion and exfoliation18,19, and mechanical sonication in organic solvents20 have been proposed for GNR synthesis. Among those methods, CNT longitudinal unzipping using a mixture of strong acids such as sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and oxidant(s) such as potassium permanganate (KMnO4) has been demonstrated an effective method to produced GNRs in a large quantity14. Moreover, oxygen-containing functional groups can be created on the GNRs simultaneously by this method, providing suitable GNRs with solution processability for industrial-oriented solution-based processing21. In this method, the critical step is to decrease the strong van der Waals attractions between the walls of CNTs by intercalating SO42− ions. Therefore the nanotube unzipping can start with the oxidants attaching one of the internal C-C bonds of the CNTs, stretching and then breaking it to from nanoribbon structure14. However usually large amount of concentrated H2SO4 (typically 1 mg/ml of CNT concentration in H2SO4) is required to unzip the nanotube completely due to the strong van der Waals interactions between the walls of CNTs14. From the practical point of view, a process required large amount of strong acids is not preferred for industrial setting because it is not only expensive for the waste treatment but also harmful to the environment. Therefore there is still a need to develop an environment-friendly and scalable method to produce GNRs.

The intertube intercalation of CNTs by different ions has been showed an effective method to decrease the van der Waals interactions between individual tubes and assist the exfoliation of bundled CNTs22,23,24. It is also possible to assist the nanotube unzipping process by intratube intercalation with suitable ions25. By selecting appropriate neutral molecules or ions to substitute H2SO4 as an intercalation agent shall be a promising approach to produce GNRs with a high yield and further reduce the usage of strong acid during the nanotube unzipping14,24,25. However, there are very few reports relevant to this issue, and a systematic study to reveal the relationship between the formation of GNRs by CNT unzipping and the molecular intercalation is still needed. Our previous work suggests that it is possible to produce GNRs by CNT unzipping with a low usage of H2SO4 and neutral molecules (e.g. KNO3) as an intercalation agent4. In this report, we perform a systematic research and describe an intercalation-assisted method to synthesis GNRs by unzipping the multi-walled CNT (MWCNT) side walls. By intertube and intratube intercalations with suitable ions under appropriate conditions, we show that it is possible to produce GNRs with a high yield using a low amount of H2SO4 (10 mg/ml of CNT concentration in H2SO4). The key step is to introduce a pretreatment of raw CNTs with potassium nitrate (KNO3) and H2SO4 under appropriate condition, allowing the potassium ions (K+), nitrate (Inline graphic) and sulfate ions (Inline graphic) to exfoliate and debundle the bundled CNTs and further intercalate into the coaxial wall of CNTs (see Fig. 1). The next step is to use KMnO4 to perform CNT oxidative unzippping at appropriate conditions such as time, oxidant concentration, and temperature. Overall, it is possible to decrease the van der Waals interactions between individual nanoutbes and the coaxial walls of CNTs by this two-step method, facilitating the GNR synthesis through CNT unzipping with a low amount of H2SO4. Detailed scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and micro Raman characterizations show that our method can produce GNRs with high yield. Systematic micro Raman, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and XRD characterizations suggest that the KNO3 and H2SO4 play an important role in the intertube and intratube intercalations during the pretreatment, providing a scientific understanding how to enhance the GNR formation by accelerating the CNT unzipping with appropriate molecular intercalation.

Figure 1. Illustration of a two-step oxidative process to synthesis GNRs by MWCNT longitudinal unzipping.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The first step is to use a pretreatment of raw MWCNTs with KNO3 and H2SO4 under appropriate conditions, allowing the K+, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic ions to exfoliate the bundled CNTs and intercalate into the coaxial walls of CNTs by intertube and intratube intercalation, respectively. The second step is to use the KMnO4 as the oxidant to longitudinally unzip MWCNTs under suitable condition.

Result

The quality and structure of the raw CNTs for the GNR synthesis by unzipping method is critical14. We used MWCNTs as the starting materials because it is possible to increase the GNR yield based on the multi-shell property26,27. The MWCNTs used as the starting material in this report was synthesized through a water-assisted CVD (supporting information). SEM characterization indicates that the raw MWCNTs were with diameters and lengths ranging from 20 to 50 nm and 8 to 10 μm, respectively, and TEM image suggests that the raw MWCNTs are almost free of amorphous carbons [Fig. S1]. In addition, the low D/G ratio exhibited in the Raman spectrum [Fig. S2] shows that the raw MWCNTs are with high crystallinity, which is a good starting material for GNR synthesis28.

We start to discuss the effects of the intertube and intratube intercalations introduced by the pretreatment with different agents including small (sample PT1) and large (sample PT2) amounts of H2SO4, and KNO3 with a small amount of H2SO4 (sample PT3). The details of the sample preparation can be found in the experimental section and summarized in Table 1. We note that all the samples were prepared by the same procedure (see experimental section) so that we can study the effect of the intercalation agents on the intertube and intratube intercalations carefully. Micro Raman spectroscopy is a powerful method to study the effect of CNT debundling due to intertube intercalation29. Figure 2(a) shows the Raman spectra of the pristine MWCNTs and the as-treated samples. Spectra of different as-treated samples were recorded at the same Raman parameters under 532 nm excitation wavelength and were normalized with respect to the G-band intensity. The G-band corresponds to the characteristic peak of the E2g symmetry phonon mode of graphite at 1563 cm−1 30,31. It is also noted that all the samples feature the D-band at 1330 cm−1 is due to the second-order Raman scattering process involving31,32. The D-band can be due to the structural imperfections in the carbon basal plane or edge site33,34. It is found that the G-band of pristine nanotubes (sample P) was shift from 1563 cm−1 to 1573 and 1576 cm−1 for sample PT1 and PT2, respectively [Fig. 2(a) and S3(a)]. The upshift of G-band is due to the C-C bond were shorten by the electron transfer from CNTs to the molecules (eg. SO42−) existed in the nanotube outer-wall contacts and is the indications of the CNT debundling by intertube intercalation29. It can also be referred that the higher amounts of H2SO4 used in the pretreatment, the better the debundling effect. We noticed that the G-band was upshift to 1575 cm−1 in sample PT3 treated with KNO3 and a small amount of H2SO4 [Fig. 2(a) and S3(a)], which is very close to the result in sample PT2, suggesting that it is possible to have effective CNT debundling by adding KNO3 with a small amount of H2SO4 (10 ml) during the pretreatment.

Table 1. The summarized reaction conditions of MWCNT pretreatment.

Sample H2SO4 (ml) KNO3 (M)
P – –
PT1 10 0
PT2 100 0
PT3 10 1
Open in a new tab

P denotes the pristine MWCNT. The amount of raw MWCNT is 0.1 g.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Micro Raman spectra of pristine CNTs and different as-pretreated samples. The spectra were normalized by the sample G-band intensity and offset for clarity.(b) XRD patterns of pristine CNTs and different as-pretreated samples. The patterns were normalized by the sample intensity at (002) diffraction angel and offset for clarity. Pristine CNTs are denoted as P. (All reaction condition are detailed in Table 1).

XRD was additionally performed to understand the microstructure of pristine CNTs and as-pretreated samples, and the XRD patterns are shown in Fig. 2(b). It is found that the 2θ value of (002) graphite peak of pristine CNTs was downshifted from 26.61° to 26.42° and 26.39° in sample PT1 and PT2, respectively [Fig. 2(b) and S3(b)], indicating the interlayer distance of graphite (002), d002, was expanded due to the intratube intercalation. This result is in consistent with previous work35. We further found the 2θ value of (002) graphite peak of pristine CNTs was downshifted to 26.38° in sample PT3 treated with KNO3 during the pretreatment [Fig. 2(b) and S3(b)]. The increased value of d002 of as-pretreated samples is an indication that the sulfate and nitrate ions were co-intercalated into the coaxial graphene cylinders of MWCNTs.

To further study the intratube intercalation effect, the as-treated samples were characterized by XPS. Previous report suggests that the upshift of C1s binding energy in XPS is an indication of the intratube intercalation35. Figure 3 shows the C1s spectra of pristine MWCNTs and as-pretreated samples, which were carefully calibrated the C1s binding energy (BEC1s) at 284.5 eV and normalized with respect to the C1s peak intensity35. It is found that the C1s binding energy of pristine nanotubes is upshift from 284.5 eV to 285.6 and 285.2 eV in sample PT1 and PT2, respectively, indicating that the larger amount of H2SO4 used in the pretreatment, the stronger the intratube intercalation effect [Fig. 3(a–c)]. Notably, we found the C1s binding energy was also upshift from 284.5 eV to 284.9 eV in sample PT3 treated with KNO3 and a small amount of H2SO4 [Fig. 3(a,d)], suggesting that the improved CNT intratube intercalation by adding KNO3 during the pretreatment. The reason why C1s binding energy of sample PT2 is higher than sample PT3 can be explained by that the presence of K+ from KNO335. The detailed C1s deconvoluted results of as-pretreated samples show several peaks including electron-poor carbon, electron-rich carbon, sp2 C-C, C-O, C=O, and O-C=O at, 284, 284.5, 285, 286, 287, and 289 eV35,36. Previous works suggests that the existence of electron-poor and electron-rich carbons peaks can be explained in terms of the dipolar interactions between the sp2 carbons and the intercalated molecules. We notice the strong peaks of electron-rich carbon regions exhibited in the XPS spectra of the as-pretreated samples, indicating the strong charge transfer between the intercalated agents (e.g. KNO3 and H2SO4) and the graphitic carbon of CNTs [Fig. 3(b–d)]35. The HRXPS result confirms that the intratube intercalation was occurred in sample PT3 treated with KNO3 and a small amount of H2SO4 [Fig. 3(d)]. Overall, the XPS analysis further provides the supported evidence for the observation by Raman spectra and XRD characterization, showing that the selected intercalated agent (e.g. KNO3 and H2SO4) can effectively intercalate into the bundle CNT structure and the coaxial walls of CNTs to decrease the strong van der Waals force of CNTs, which is critical to produce GNR with high yield by unzipping CNTs (discuss below).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

HRXPS C1s spectra of (a) pristine CNTs and different as-pretreated samples : (b) PT1, (c) PT2, and (d) PT3. (All reaction condition are detailed in Table 1).

After the pretreatment, all the as-treated CNTs were reacted with the same amount of KMnO4 as the oxidant to unzip the as-treated CNTs. To understand the effectiveness and yield of the GNR production using the developed pretreatment with different agents and different unzipping conditions, a series of characterizations including SEM, TEM, atomic force microscopy (AFM), XRD, micro Raman, XPS, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and thermogravimetric (TGA) were performed. Detailed reaction conditions of different as-produced samples are summarized in the Table 2. Representative SEM and TEM images are shown in Fig. 4. Below the temperature of 30 °C, we did not observe any longitudinal CNT unzipping by 10 ml H2SO4 with KNO3 under the extensive microscopy characterization. As the reaction temperature was increased to 30 °C, it is found that the raw MWCNTs [Fig. S1] were partially unzipped from the outer layer of cylindrical graphene sheets by 10 ml H2SO4 with KNO3 (sample A), according to the SEM observation [Fig. 4(a)]. Additional TEM characterization indicates the incompletely unzipped CNTs with core shell structure inside the unzipped ribbons [Fig. 4(f)], suggesting that 30 °C might be the onset temperature of CNT longitudinal unzipping in our work, which is in agreed with the observation of previous work36. As the temperature was further increased to 70 °C (sample B), it was found that the local part of raw CNTs were formed fully unzipped ribbon structures [Fig. 4(b)]. The low magnification TEM images were also shown in Fig. S4(a), revealing the unzipped ribbons with irregular winkles in the surface and the edge. The result were further support by the high magnification TEM observation [Fig. 4(g)] that the structure of sample B were strip of ribbon with width near 180 nm, which is about 3 times larger than the average diameter of pristine CNTs [Fig. S1]. We note that it is difficult to image the edge structures of the as-produced samples by TEM due to the edge oxidation and curling. While it is possible to remove the oxygen-containing groups by heating the samples over 2000 °C, the reconstruction of the as-produce GNRs will be occurred during the high temperature treatment. The overall morphology and physical structure of the sample B was further carefully investigated using AFM. Figure 5(a) shows the representative AFM image and indicates the presence of single atomic layer ribbon nanostructures [Fig. 5(b)] with high edge linearity. The histogram and Gaussian statistical analysis shown in Fig. 5(c) revealed the single-layer to few-layer nanostructures indicated by the averaged nominal height of 2.1 nm. In addition, the nominal widths of the as-produced GNRs were ranging from 80 to 120 nm and an averaged nominal width of 101.8 nm [Fig. 5(d)]. The AFM result is in agreed with the TEM observation, confirming that single-layered GNRs with high edge linearity can be produced by our develop method (Fig. 1).

Table 2. The summarized reaction conditions of MWCNT longitudinal unzipping.

Sample H2SO4 (ml) KNO3 (M) Temperature (°C)
A 10 1 30
B 10 1 70
C 100 0 70
D 10 0 70
E 0 1a 70
Open in a new tab

The amount of raw MWCNT is 0.1 g.

aDissolve in 10 ml DI water.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

SEM images of (a) sample A, (b) sample B, (c) sample C, (d) sample D, and (e) sample E. (Scale bar = 50 nm). TEM images of (f) sample A, (g) sample B, (h) sample C, and (i) sample D. (Scale bar = 50 nm). All the samples were synthesized using the developed stepwise, solution-based oxidative process shown in Fig. 1. Reaction condition are detailed in Table 2.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) AFM image of Sample B. Reaction condition is detailed in Table 2. (b) The height data of three individual GNRs shown in (a). The A, B, and C are used to denote the individual GNRs. (c) Height and (d) width distributions measured by AFM. Solid lines represent the Gaussian distributions to the experimental data.

We notice that the morphology of sample B produced with KNO3 and 10 ml H2SO4 at 70 °C is very similar to that of the GNRs produced with 100 ml H2SO4 at 70 °C (sample C) [Fig. 4(c,h)]. To further understand the role of KNO3 on the CNT longitudinal unzipping, two samples treated with 10 ml H2SO4 (sample D) and 10 ml KNO3(aq) (sample E) respectively were prepared and characterized by SEM and TEM. The images show that a mixture of CNTs and partially unzipped CNTs and solely tubular microstructure were existed in sample D [Fig. 4(d,i), and S4(b)] and sample E [Fig. 4(e)], respectively. The result suggests that first of all, H2SO4 is essential to produce GNR by CNT unzipping, which is consistent with previous study that the CNT opening is based on the oxidation of alkenes by permanganate in strong acid14. Secondary, the formation of GNRs by CNT unzipping could not be completed if the amount of H2SO4 used in the entire reaction was too low [Fig. 4(d,i), and S3(b)]. By adding KNO3 to assist the intertube and intratube intercalations of CNTs during the preferment step, it is possible to reduce the usage of H2SO4for GNR production by CNT unzipping [Fig. 4(b,g), and S3(a)].

The additional evidence of the microstructure changes of the starting CNTs and the as-produced samples were obtained from the XRD characterization. Moreover, the XRD analysis can be performed to quantitatively determine the degree of unzipping38. In the XRD patterns, the raw MWCNTs shows a peak at 26.6° [Fig. 6(a)], attributed to the (002) plane of the interplanar graphite with a d spacing of 0.34 nm according to the Bragg’s Law37. For the sample A prepared at 30 °C [Fig. 6(a)], a characteristic peak of oxidized GNRs structure at 9.6° was shown14,38, suggesting the existence of a mixture of MWCNTs and oxidized GNRs. This result is in consistent with SEM observation [Fig. 4(b)] and previous work14,38. The calculated d spacing was increased from 0.34 to 0.82 nm, which was due to the functional groups generated between the adjacent layers of as-produced GNRs during the process of oxidative unzipping CNTs39. As the temperature was increased to 70 °C (sample B), the XRD pattern shows no characteristic (002) peak of CNTs and only oxidized GNR peak at 10.0°, implying that a high portion of oxidized GNRs was existed in this as-produced sample. Furthermore, it is found both two peaks at 10.0° and 26.6° in the XRD pattern of sample D, indicating that sample D was composed with both oxidized GNR and CNT. Further quantitative analysis of oxidized GNR portion can be evaluated by the ratio of I001/(I002 + I001) in the XRD patterns35,37. The (I001) and (I002) indicate the peak intensities of oxidized GNR and CNT, respectively. Fig. 6(b) shows the estimated result of I001/(I002 + I001) ratios of various samples. We notice that the ratio of sample B treated with KNO3 and 10 ml H2SO4 is nearly 1, suggesting a nearly 100% yield of oxidized GNR. In addition the ratio of sample B is 1.49 times higher than that of sample D treat with 10 ml H2SO4 (0.67), indicating that GNRs with high yield could be generated in the report method using KNO3 to assist the CNT unzipping.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(a) XRD patterns of pristine CNTs and different as-pretreated samples. Reaction condition are detailed in Table 2. (002) and (001) are denoted as the planes of the interplanar graphite of CNTs and oxidized GNRs, respectively. (b) Quantitative analysis of GNR yield by the ratio of I001/(I002 + I001) in the XRD patterns35,38. (I001) and (I002) indicate the peak intensities of oxidized GNR and CNT, respectively.

Further atomic-scale structural information of the as-produced GNRs can be obtained from micro Raman spectroscopy characterization. Figure 7 shows the representative Raman spectra of pristine CNTs and different as-produced GNRs. Three bands are present around 1340 cm−1, 1590 cm−1, and 2675 cm−1, which are respectively assigned to the D-band, G-band, and 2D-band of carbon. The D-band can be due to the structural imperfections in the carbon basal plane or edge site33,34 while the G-band is the representative peak of graphite, corresponding to the sp2 carbon bond stretching of E2g mode33. The 2D-band is the overtone of the D-band and typically used to indicate the quality of graphene structure31,40. After the oxidative unzipping process, the intensity of D-and 2D-band increased and decreased, respectively, indicating that the-produced GNRs contained more defects or edge effect than starting CNTs. The defects can be holes with different sizes and shapes on the basal planes of the as-produced GNRs and the attached oxygen functional groups at the edges and surface of ribbons36. The defects were caused by the unzipping process including manganate ester formation and cleavage of C-C bonding introduced by the vicinal diols36. The Raman analysis further supports the XRD results [Fig. 6a]. Generally the value of the intensity ratio of D-band to G-band (ID/IG) is used to estimate the degree of disorder and defects of carbon materials41. The ID/IG ratio of sample B and C were 1.01 and 1.14, respectively, showing that more defect generated on the as-produced GNR by large amount of H2SO4 (100 ml)36. We further noticed that the ID/IG ratio of sample B and sample D were 1.01 and 0.74 respectively, indicating that sample B was with higher level of oxidation than sample D while both samples were synthesized by a low amount of H2SO4 (10 ml). This finding suggests that it is possible to achieve higher level of oxidation with the assistance of KNO3 during the nanotube unzipping.

Figure 7. Micro Raman spectra of pristine CNTs and as-produced samples.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Reaction conditions are detailed in Table 2. The spectra were normalized by the sample G-band intensity and offset for clarity.

The chemical compositions of as-produced samples were systematically studied by XPS. Figure 8(a) shows the XPS survey scan spectra of pristine CNTs and as-produced GNRs and were normalized with respect to the C1s intensity. It is noted that only C1s and O1s peaks respectively at 284.5 eV and 534 eV were observed in the XPS spectra of as-produced GNRs, showing no impurities such as the moieties from KNO3 and H2SO4 in the as-produced samples. In general, the ratio of peak intensity of C1s to that of O1s (C/O ratio) in the XPS spectra of carbon materials is an indication of the oxidation degree of carbon materials41,42. The C/O ratios of different samples were summarized in Table 3. It is found that the C/O ratios were largely decreased from 19 to 2.5 for samples prepared at 30 °C and 70 °C, respectively, suggesting that temperature is a critical factor to control the oxidation degree of as-produced GNRs. Moreover, we found that the C/O ratio of sample B is similar to those of sample C and D, suggesting the oxidation degree of the as-produced GNRs prepared by the mixture of KNO3 and H2SO4 is similar to those of samples prepared with H2SO4, which is in consistent with the Raman result. The surface functionalities of the as-produced samples were further studied by HRXPS. Figure 8(b–f) show the C1s peaks of HRXPS spectra of pristine CNTs and as-produced GNRs and can be deconvoluted to several peaks at 284.4, 286, 287, and 289 eV, which are corresponded to sp2 C-C, C-O, C=O, and COOH surface functionalities, respectively36. This result suggests that the as-produced GNRs possess oxygen-containing functional groups, which is in agreed with our XRD and Raman results as well as previous study14,36,43. The quantitative fractions of the oxygen-containing functional groups in the as-produced GNRs are summarized in Table 3. The result shows that sample B prepared with the mixture of KNO3 and 10 ml H2SO4 with higher fraction of surface functionality of 42.91 at% [Fig. 8(d)] than that of sample D reacted with 10 ml H2SO4 (39.40 at%) [Fig. 8(f)], implying that the degree of surface functionalization of GNRs during the chemical oxidative unzipping CNTs can be enhanced by introducing KNO3 in the pretreatment. This finding is also confirmed the ID/IG ratio analysis in our micro Raman characterization [Fig. 7]. While sample C prepared with 100 ml H2SO4 shows a higher surface functionality [Fig. 8(e)] than that of sample B prepared by the mixture of KNO3 and 10 ml H2SO4 (Table 3), a higher COOH (2.93%) shown in the C1s region indicates more defects generated due to the large amount of sulfuric acid used in the sample preparation36.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

(a) XPS spectra of pristine CNTs and different as-synthesized samples.Reaction condition are detailed in Table 2. The labels of C and O are indicated as the C1s and O1s peaks respectively at. 284.6 eV and 534 eV, respectively. HRXPS C1s spectra of (b) pristine CNTs, (c) sample A, (d) sample B, (e) sample C, and (f) sample D. The C1s peaks were carefully deconvoluted to C-C, C-O, C=O, and COOH surface functionalities at 284.4, 286, 287, and 289 eV, respectively.

Table 3. Atomic percentages of different carbon bonds indentified by XPS in the pristine CNTs and different as-produced GNRs.

Sample C/O C1s (at%) C-O (at%) C=O (at%) COOH (at%)
P 24.00 89.97 10.03 0 0
A 19.00 83.24 11.57 5.19 0
B 2.50 56.94 35.17 6.28 1.61
C 2.20 55.21 34.72 7.14 2.93
D 2.90 60.60 30.93 6.46 2.01
Open in a new tab

FTIR and TGA were also performed to verify the Raman and XPS results. The FTIR spectrum of the pristine nanotubes is practically featureless with extremely low infrared absorption intensities [Fig. 9(a)]. Two major peaks at 1647 cm−1 (C-O stretching) and 3445 cm−1 (COO-H/O-H stretching) exhibited for the as-produced samples suggest that various carboxyl and hydroxyl functionalities were existed on the as-produced GNRs. The result were consisted with the XPS study [Fig. 8], which can be attributed to the formation of epoxy, carbonyl, and carboxyl groups generated during the CNTs oxidative unzipping process14,36,43. To provide further supported evidence for the observation of XPS and FTIR, TGA was performed to study the total weight loss (wt%) of as-produced samples [Fig. 9(b)]. The weight loss curve of pristine CNTs showed a slight drop after 600 °C, which can be attributed to the residual impurities or catalysts (i.e. iron) during the CNTs synthesis44. For weight losses of the as-produced GNRs between 150 and 300 °C were corresponded to the formation of CO, CO2 gas release from the labile oxygen-containing surface functionalities of the ribbons45. For 350 to 800 °C, the weight losses indicated the remove of other more stable oxygen-containing functional group46. The weight loss (wt%) were increased in an order: sample P > A > D > B > C. The results imply that the level of oxidation for all samples, and can be further confirmed the result the C/O ratio by XPS of as-produced samples (Table 3).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

(a) FTIR spectra of pristine CNTs and different as-synthesized samples. Reaction condition are detailed in Table 2. The labels of C=O and COO-H/O-H are indicated as C=O and COO-H/O-H stretching modes, respectively at 1647 and 3445 cm−1, respectively. (b) TGA patterns of pristine CNTs and different as-synthesized samples.

Discussion

To date, the mechanism of GNR synthesis by longitudinal unzipping of CNTs is still not clear, making it difficult to predict the optimal condition to produce GNRs with high yield. On the basis of the experimental result (Table S1), we propose the possible mechanism in our system discussed in the following. First of all, sulfate ions can enter the interspace between CNTs through oxidation, leading to the intertube interaction to reduce the inter-CNT van der Waals force (Sample C and D)47,48. In addition, the nitrate ions can act as the co-intercalatent to assist the intertube interaction (Sample B). Furthermore K+ ions can enter into the graphene layers of CNTs if the interaction energy overcomes the net energy of inter-CNT van der Waals interaction (Sample A and B)49. After the interaction assisted by sulfate and nitrate ions and K+ ions, the reactive MnO4− with H2SO4 can enter the expanded interspace of CNTs, and then oxidize and unzip the C=C bonds. The unzipping of C=C bond on the outer layer of MWCNTs was triggered by sufficient number of defects created by mild oxidizer condition at edge sites and grain boundaries of the CNTs. The defective sites at the edges or grain boundaries open up due to intercalation by K+ ions and solvated sulfate and nitrate ions. The proposed mechanism can be supported by the previous work which suggests that the sulfate and nitrate ions can act as intercalatent and co-intercalatent, respectively, along with K+ ions, to cause exfoliation of MWCNTs in an effective manner25. To understand the role of K+ ions during the intercalating process, we have performed control experiments using various potassium salts including KNO3, K2CO3, and K2S2O8 with different concentrations in the pretreatment step to unzip the CNTs. We found that KNO3 in H2SO4 (sample B, F, and G) were more effective for exfoliating MWCNTs compared to K2CO3 (Sample H, I, and J) and K2S2O8 (Sample K, L, and M) in H2SO4. The exfoliation efficiency of CNTs in 2 M KNO3 (sample G) was lower than that in 1 M KNO3 (sample B), and the corresponding yield of GNRs is 80% and 100%, respectively. This may be the reason that with higher concentration of KNO3, more energy is required to initiate intercalation between two graphene layers of CNTs. The low exfoliation efficiency of CNTs in diluted KNO3 (0.5 M; sample F) is most likely due to the inefficient intercalation of anions and K+ ions25. The above results suggest that K+ ions may play an important role in the interspace CNT intercalation. In general the chemical affinities and the sizes and bonding distances of the intercalatent can affect the intercalation in MWCNTs50. However, the exact mechanism is still not clear due to the intricacies associated with modulating the electrostatic, solvation, and van der Waals interaction by changing ionic strength, conductivity, solvation energy, viscosity, etc. Nevertheless, our work provides the experimental understanding of the intercalation effect on the CNT unzipping. Further theoretical and experimental studies devoted to the rational design of different intercalation molecules will be helpful to provide a fundamental understanding and further enhance the production yield of GNRs with lower strong acid usage by CNT longitudinal unzipping.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we report a facile and effective solution-based oxidative process to produce GNRs by CNT longitudinal unzipping. The experimental finding presented in this report shows that the intertube and intratube intercalation of CNTs by suitable intercalation molecules can be a useful method to achieve not only high-yield GNR synthesis but also low usage of concentrated H2SO4. The experimental approach should allow other materials synthesis or processing related to the intercalation of layered materials including graphene, boron nitride, and transition metal dichalcogenides nanosheets51,52.

Methods

Potassium permanganate (KMnO4, 98%), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 35%), and ether [(C2H5)2O, 99+%] were obtained from ACROS. Potassium nitrate (KNO3, 95%), potassium carbonate (K2CO3, 99%), and potassium persulfate (K2S2O8, 99%) were purchased from JT-Baker. Hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4, >95%) were purchased from Scharlau. All the chemicals were used as received. The raw MWCNTs were synthesized using a water-assisted catalytic chemical vapor deposition53, and details are described in the supporting information. The detailed GNR synthesis process was similar to our previous work4 and provided in the supporting information. In brief, MWCNTs (0.1 g) was magnetically stirred (300 rpm, 2 hrs) with a different amount of concentrated H2SO4 and 1 g KNO3. Detailed conditions are summarized in Table 1. Then 0.5 g KMnO4 was added slowly to the solution and further stirred (2 hrs, room temperature). Then the unzipping reaction was performed for 2 hrs in a water bath. Table 2 shows the detailed reaction conditions. After the reaction was completed, the product was purified and dried with a series steps reported elsewhere14. The as-produced samples were characterized by various techniques including SEM, TEM, AFM, XPS, XRD, micro Raman, FTIR, and TGA. The detailed sample preparations and measurement conditions are provided in the supporting information.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Li, Y.-S. et al. Intercalation-assisted longitudinal unzipping of carbon nanotubes for green and scalable synthesis of graphene nanoribbons. Sci. Rep. 6, 22755; doi: 10.1038/srep22755 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep22755-s1.doc (3.7MB, doc)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (MOST Grant no. NSC 102 2218-E-011-022-MY2) and National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (NTUST). The authors acknowledge the TEM technical assistance of Prof. M. Ujihara.

Footnotes

Author Contributions W.-H.C. proposed and supervised te project. Y.-S.L. designed and carried out the experiments and analyzed the data. J.-L.L. and S.-Y.W. carried out the synthesis and characterizations. All the authors participated in the discussion and writing of the manuscript.

References

  1. Li X., Wang X., Zhang L., Lee S. & Dai H. Chemically Derived, Ultrasmooth Graphene Nanoribbon Semiconductors. Science 319, 1229–1232 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Son Y.-W., Cohen M. L. & Louie S. G. Half-metallic graphene nanoribbons. Nature 444, 347–349 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Han M. Y., Özyilmaz B., Zhang Y. & Kim P. Energy band-gap engineering of graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. lett. 98, 206805 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang C., Li Y.-S., Jiang J. & Chiang W.-H. Controllable Tailoring Graphene Nanoribbons with Tunable Surface Functionalities: An Effective Strategy toward High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 17441–17449 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang Y., Shao Y., Matson D. W., Li J. & Lin Y. Nitrogen-doped graphene and its application in electrochemical biosensing. ACS Nano 4, 1790–1798 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu Y., Dong X. & Chen P. Biological and chemical sensors based on graphene materials. Chem. So. Rev. 41, 2283–2307 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Holby E. F. & Taylor C. D. Control of graphene nanoribbon vacancies by Fe and N dopants: Implications for catalysis. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 064102 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis D. J. et al. Silver‐Graphene Nanoribbon Composite Catalyst for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Alkaline Electrolyte. Electroanal. 26, 164–170 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim H., Abdala A. A. & Macosko C. W. Graphene/polymer nanocomposites. Macromolecules 43, 6515–6530 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  10. Lin J. et al. Graphene nanoribbon and nanostructured SnO2 composite anodes for lithium ion batteries. ACS Nano 7, 6001–6006 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang X. et al. Room-Temperature All-Semiconducting Sub-10-nm Graphene Nanoribbon Field-Effect Transistors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 206803 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fiori G. & Iannaccone G. Simulation of graphene nanoribbon field-effect transistors. Electron Device Lett., IEEE 28, 760–762 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  13. Ma L., Wang J. & Ding F. Recent Progress and Challenges in Graphene Nanoribbon Synthesis. Chem. Phys. Chem. 14, 47–54 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kosynkin D. V. et al. Longitudinal unzipping of carbon nanotubes to form graphene nanoribbons. Nature 458, 872–876 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jiao L., Zhang L., Wang X., Diankov G. & Dai H. Narrow graphene nanoribbons from carbon nanotubes. Nature 458, 877–880 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Elías A. L. et al. Longitudinal Cutting of Pure and Doped Carbon Nanotubes to Form Graphitic Nanoribbons Using Metal Clusters as Nanoscalpels. Nano Lett. 10, 366–372 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Parashar U. K., Bhandari S., Srivastava R. K., Jariwala D. & Srivastava A. Single step synthesis of graphene nanoribbons by catalyst particle size dependent cutting of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Nanoscale 3, 3876–3882 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cano-Márquez A. G. et al. Ex-MWNTs: Graphene Sheets and Ribbons Produced by Lithium Intercalation and Exfoliation of Carbon Nanotubes. Nano Lett. 9, 1527–1533 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Xie L. et al. Graphene Nanoribbons from Unzipped Carbon Nanotubes: Atomic Structures, Raman Spectroscopy, and Electrical Properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 10394–10397 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jiao L., Wang X., Diankov G., Wang H. & Dai H. Facile synthesis of high-quality graphene nanoribbons. Nat Nanotechnol. 5, 321–325 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Li D., Muller M. B., Gilje S., Kaner R. B. & Wallace G. G. Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. Nat Nanotechnol. 3, 101–105 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bower C., Kleinhammes A., Wu Y. & Zhou O. Intercalation and partial exfoliation of single-walled carbon nanotubes by nitric acid. Chem. Phys. Lett. 288, 481–486 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee R. S., Kim H. J., Fischer J. E., Thess A. & Smalley R. E. Conductivity enhancement in single-walled carbon nanotube bundles doped with K and Br. Nature 388, 255–257 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  24. Ericson L. M. et al. Macroscopic, Neat, Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Fibers. Science 305, 1447–1450 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shinde D. B., Majumder M. & Pillai V. K. Counter-ion dependent, longitudinal unzipping of multi-walled carbon nanotubes to highly conductive and transparent graphene nanoribbons. Sci. Rep. 4, 4363; 10.1038/srep04363 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lin L.-Y. et al. A novel core-shell multi-walled carbon nanotube@graphene oxide nanoribbon heterostructure as a potential supercapacitor material. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 11237–11245 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang H., Wang Y., Hu Z. & Wang X. Cutting and unzipping multiwalled carbon nanotubes into curved graphene nanosheets and their enhanced supercapacitor performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4, 6827–6834 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dresselhaus M. S., Dresselhaus G., Saito R. & Jorio A. Raman spectroscopy of carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rep. 409, 47–99 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  29. Rao A. M., Eklund P. C., Bandow S., Thess A. & Smalley R. E. Evidence for charge transfer in doped carbon nanotube bundles from Raman scattering. Nature 388, 257–259 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  30. Tuinstra F. & Koenig J. L. Raman spectrum of graphite. J. Chem. Phys. 53, 1126–1130 (1970). [Google Scholar]
  31. Ferrari A. C. et al. Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 187401 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nemanich R. J. & Solin S. A. First-and second-order Raman scattering from finite-size crystals of graphite. Phys. Rev. B 20, 392 (1979). [Google Scholar]
  33. Malard L. M., Pimenta M. A., Dresselhaus G. & Dresselhaus M. S. Raman spectroscopy in graphene. Phys. Rep. 473, 51–87 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  34. Ferrari A. C. & Robertson J. Interpretation of Raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon. Phys. Rev. B 61, 14095 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  35. Kovtyukhova N. I. et al. Non-oxidative intercalation and exfoliation of graphite by Brønsted acids. Nat. Chem. 6, 957–963 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Higginbotham A. L., Kosynkin D. V., Sinitskii A., Sun Z. & Tour J. M. Lower-Defect Graphene Oxide Nanoribbons from Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Nano 4, 2059–2069 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yang Z. et al. Carbon nanotubes bridged with graphene nanoribbons and their use in high‐efficiency dye‐sensitized solar cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 3996–3999 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Futaba D. N., Yamada T., Kobashi K., Yumura M. & Hata K. Macroscopic wall number analysis of single-walled, double-walled, and few-walled carbon nanotubes by X-ray diffraction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 5716–5719 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hummers W. S. & Offeman R. E. Preparation of Graphitic Oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80, 1339–1339 (1958). [Google Scholar]
  40. Graf D. et al. Spatially resolved Raman spectroscopy of single-and few-layer graphene. Nano Lett. 7, 238–242 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Dreyer D. R., Park S., Bielawski C. W. & Ruoff R. S. The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 228–240 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yang D. et al. Chemical analysis of graphene oxide films after heat and chemical treatments by X-ray photoelectron and Micro-Raman spectroscopy. Carbon 47, 145–152 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  43. Cataldo F. et al. Graphene nanoribbons produced by the oxidative unzipping of single-wall carbon nanotubes. Carbon 48, 2596–2602 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  44. Bom D. et al. Thermogravimetric analysis of the oxidation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes: evidence for the role of defect sites in carbon nanotube chemistry. Nano Lett. 2, 615–619 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  45. Stankovich S. et al. Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 45, 1558–1565 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  46. Shen J. et al. Fast and facile preparation of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide nanoplatelets. Chem. Mater. 21, 3514–3520 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  47. Toyoda M., Kaburagi Y., Yoshida A. & Inagaki M. Acceleration of graphitization in carbon fibers through exfoliation. Carbon 42, 2567–2572 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  48. Inagaki M., Tashiro R., Washino Y.-i. & Toyoda M. Exfoliation process of graphite via intercalation compounds with sulfuric acid. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 65, 133–137 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  49. Suzuki S. & Tomita M. Observation of potassium‐intercalated carbon nanotubes and their valence‐band excitation spectra. J. Appl. Phys. 79, 3739–3743 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  50. Dresselhaus M. S. & Dresselhaus G. Intercalation compounds of graphite. Adv. Phys. 51, 1–186 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  51. Halim U. et al. A rational design of cosolvent exfoliation of layered materials by directly probing liquid–solid interaction. Nat. Commun. 4, 2213; 10.1038/ncomms3213 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Coleman J. N. et al. Two-dimensional nanosheets produced by liquid exfoliation of layered materials. Science 331, 568–571 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Chiang W.-H., Futaba D. N., Yumura M. & Hata K. Growth control of single-walled, double-walled, and triple-walled carbon nanotube forests by a priori electrical resistance measurement of catalyst films. Carbon 49, 4368–4375 (2011). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep22755-s1.doc (3.7MB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES