Skip to main content
Biology Letters logoLink to Biology Letters
. 2016 Feb;12(2):20150670. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0670

Serendipity in research—investigation into illegal wildlife trade discovers a new population of Steller's sea cows: a reply to Pyenson et al. (2016)

Lorelei Crerar 1,, E C M Parsons 2, Daryl Domning 3
PMCID: PMC4780542  PMID: 26843553

According to Stejneger [1], it is most likely that the last of the great northern sea cows went extinct around 1768. Many Steller's sea cow (Hydrodamalis gigas) bones have been located on the Commander and Aleutian Islands to date [2,3]. However, no verified H. gigas bones have ever been located that come from farther north. Crerar et al. [4] described a trophically distinct population of Steller's sea cows from St Lawrence Island using bones obtained by LD Crerar from Jerry Kochheiser of Alaskan Fossil Ivory. Mr Kochheiser obtained several hundred pounds of bone by travelling to St Lawrence Island and purchasing them from local residents who had excavated them.

Pyenson et al. [5] stated that studies of this type should be conducted using museum voucher specimens. However, the bones were not collected as part of a typical palaeontological study, but as the by-product of a very different kind of study (unpublished). Crerar [6] found bone purported to be Steller's sea cow being sold at knife shows (for carving purposes) and on Ebay. This material is commonly known as ‘mermaid ivory’. As Steller's sea cows are extinct, sale of such material is legal and does not violate the US Endangered Species Act, the US Marine Mammal Protection Act or the Convention for the International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). However, we noted that morphologically some of this ‘mermaid ivory’ did not resemble sirenian bone, but was perhaps some other sort of marine mammal bone. This hypothesis was verified using DNA typing [7]. Thus, the samples in Crerar et al. [4] were collected for an analysis of bone that was suspected of being traded illegally, and the identification of a new population of H. gigas at St Lawrence Island was a serendipitous and beneficial by-product of a study with entirely different aims. (Investigation is also recommended to examine purported mammoth ivory being sold in the same venues. The sale of ‘mammoth ivory’ could hide illegal trade in elephant ivory, which is similar. According to Burragato et al. [8], a very small quantity of ivory is required to make the differentiation.)

The analysis of H. gigas bone acquired from Ebay sellers and knife dealers provided the first tangible evidence in support of the claim by Murie [9], who, when reporting on an Eskimo description of an animal formerly found at St Lawrence Island, stated that this “would indicate Steller's sea cow and is most interesting information. However, no bones have been obtained as yet. … [Y]et [this tradition] deserves special attention in future work on the island” (p. 345). Using DNA typing from the published Steller's sea cow sequence generated by Ozawa et al. [10], the identity of a large number of commercially traded bone samples was established, revealing several that did not derive from Steller's sea cows (and were potentially illegal marine mammal bone).

We initially thought that the bones might have come from carcasses (e.g. from Bering Island) stranded on St Lawrence Island (although that was unlikely considering the large distance from Bering Island), or had been brought there by natives who make decorative carvings of the bone. However, when nitrogen-15 (δ15N)/carbon-13 (δ13C) values were obtained for the bones, it became clear that these bones were not from the population that lived around Bering Island, but from some other location—a finding consistent with their claimed origin from St Lawrence Island.

At the time of publication of Crerar et al. [4], these sea cow bones were not yet in a museum collection, but were and are still being used in ongoing genetic analyses. They are not complete bones, but merely sections or fragments of ribs. In a study of the population ecology of a recently extinct species, it would have been preferable to use museum specimens. However, as explained above, the samples were not initially intended for genetic and isotope comparisons between museum specimens from different locations. Indeed, there are no known museum specimens of Steller's sea cows from St Lawrence Island, so data solely from museum specimens would never have revealed this previously unknown population.

This was a significant discovery in the field of sirenian research. It extends the known range of H. gigas northward by over 1600 km and 8° of latitude. The discovery of illicit trade in the bone of threatened species under the guise of Steller's sea cow bone was also a significant discovery for conservation science. Museum specimens are very useful, but these discoveries would not have been made if our research had relied solely on museum specimens. However, we acknowledge the importance of depositing voucher specimens in a public collection, so bone fragments used in the Crerar et al. analysis were deposited in the George Mason University Collection in December 2015 (collection numbers in table 1). The genetic sequences of the samples analysed in Crerar et al. [4] are already on deposit at GenBank (accession nos. KP134338–KP134342) and in Dryad (doi:10.5061/dryad.vf86p).

Table 1.

Assigned collection numbers for bones used in Crerar et al. [4].

GMU collection number original Biology Letters article identifier
GMU 00001 Crerar003
GMU 00002 Crerar005
GMU 00003 Crerar001
GMU 00004 Crerar004
GMU 00005 Crerar002
USNM 593920 Crerar006

Footnotes

The accompanying comment can be viewed at http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0149.

Competing interests

We have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Stejneger L. 1887. How the great northern sea-cow (Rytina) became exterminated. Am. Nat. 21, 1047–1054. ( 10.1086/274607) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mattioli S, Domning DP. 2006. An annotated list of extant skeletal material of Steller's sea cow (hydrodamalis gigas) (Sirenia: Dugongidae) from the Commander Islands. Aquatic Mammals 32, 273–288. ( 10.1578/AM.32.3.2006.273) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Domning DP, Thomason J, Corbett DG. 2007. Steller's sea cow in the Aleutian Islands. Mar. Mammal Sci. 23, 976–983. ( 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2007.00153.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Crerar LD, Crerar AP, Domning DP, Parsons ECM. 2014. Rewriting the history of an extinction—was a population of Steller's sea cows (Hydrodamalis gigas) at St Lawrence Island also driven to extinction? Biol. Lett. 10, 20140878 ( 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0878) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pyenson ND, Parham JF, Velez-Juarbe J. 2016. The dilemma of trade samples and the importance of museum vouchers—caveats from a study on the extinction of Steller's sea cow: a comment on Crerar et al. (2014) Biol. Lett. 12, 20150149 ( 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0149) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Crerar LD. 2012. Genetics of the Steller‘s sea cow (Hydrodamalis gigas): a study of ancient bone material. (cited 6 October 2015).
  • 7.Crerar, et al. In preparation. Illegal trade of marine mammal bone exposed: simple test identifies bones of “mermaid ivory” or Steller's sea cow (Hydrodamalis gigas).
  • 8.Burragato F, Materazzi S, Curini R, Ricci G. 1998. New forensic tool for the identification of elephant or mammoth ivory. Forensic Sci. Int. 96, 189–196. ( 10.1016/S0379-0738(98)00128-5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Murie OJ. 1936. Notes on the mammals of St. Lawrence Island, Alaska. In Archaeological excavations at Kukulik, St. Lawrence Island, Alaska, vol. 2, pp. 337–346. Fairbanks, AL: University of Alaska, Fairbanks. Miscellaneous Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ozawa T, Hayashi S, Mikhelson VM. 1997. Phylogenetic position of mammoth and Steller's sea cow within Tethytheria demonstrated by mitochondrial DNA sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 44, 406–413. ( 10.1007/PL00006160) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biology Letters are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES