Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1974 Jun;27(6):447–451. doi: 10.1136/jcp.27.6.447

Serum gentamicin assay: A comparison and assessment of different methods

I Phillips 1,2, Christine Warren 1,2, S E Smith 1,2
PMCID: PMC478153  PMID: 4607063

Abstract

We have compared, in a clinical laboratory, three methods for estimating the concentration of gentamicin in serum. The adenylase method is most accurate, but requires considerable skilled technical time and expensive apparatus. The urease method requires an accurate pH meter but is otherwise inexpensive, but in our hands, although it produces results most rapidly, it also requires considerable technician time and is least accurate. The agar diffusion method requires no expensive apparatus, least technician time, and produces results of acceptable accuracy. It does, however, take longer than the other two methods to produce results.

Full text

PDF
447

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bourne P. R., Phillips I., Smith S. E. Modification of the urease method for gentamicin assays. J Clin Pathol. 1974 Feb;27(2):168–169. doi: 10.1136/jcp.27.2.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Noone P., Pattison J. R., Samson D. Simple, rapid method for assay of aminoglycoside antibiotics. Lancet. 1971 Jul 3;2(7714):16–19. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(71)90007-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Smith D. H., Van Otto B., Smith A. L. A rapid chemical assay for gentamicin. N Engl J Med. 1972 Mar 16;286(11):583–586. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197203162861106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES