Abstract
Purpose of review
Modern food animal production is a major contributor to the global economy, owing to advanced intensive indoor production facilities aimed at increasing market readiness and profit. Consequences of these advances are accumulation of dusts, gases and microbial products that diminish air quality within production facilities. Chronic inhalation exposure contributes to onset and exacerbation of respiratory symptoms and diseases in animals and workers. This article reviews literature regarding constituents of farm animal production facility dusts; animal responses to production building and organic dust exposure, and the effect of chronic inhalation exposure on pulmonary oxidative stress and inflammation.
Recent findings
–Porcine models of production facility and organic dust exposures reveal striking similarities to observations of human cells, tissues and clinical data. Oxidative stress plays a key role in mediating respiratory diseases in animals and humans, and enhancement of antioxidant levels through nutritional supplements can improve respiratory health.
Summary
– Pigs are well adapted to the exposures common to swine production buildings and thus serve as excellent models for facility workers. Insight for understanding mechanisms governing organic dust associated respiratory diseases may come from parallel comparisons between farmers and the animals they raise.
Keywords: Agriculture, animal husbandry, animal models, respiratory disease, oxidative stress and antioxidant defenses
Introduction
Livestock and poultry production workers have an increased risk of developing respiratory diseases, such as asthma-like syndrome, rhinosinusitis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, organic dust toxic syndrome, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic bronchitis, as a result of chronic inhalation exposure to farm animal production buildings [1-4]. When compared to crop workers, livestock workers have a higher risk of developing chronic bronchitis and COPD, and the risk increases in farmers raising two or more types of livestock [4]. Repeated exposure to swine facility organic dust has been linked to diminished inflammation responses by respiratory and immune cells of humans, mice and pigs in vitro [5-8**] and in vivo [9], a phenomenon referred to as the chronic inflammation adaptive response, which was reviewed recently [1,10]. Findings of these studies are consistent with observations of dampened innate immune responses to continuous concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFO) environment exposures in human subjects [5].
In the past decade, swine models have emerged as excellent tools to study human pulmonary diseases, including cystic fibrosis [11], respiratory distresses in neonates [12], and asthma [13,14]. The availability of the pig genome sequence [15,16] together with metagenomic datasets of organic dust microbiomes[17**,18**] provide insight for investigating and understanding mechanisms of clinical manifestations of farm exposures. This review will highlight relevant farm animal respiratory studies with particular emphasis on swine production environment exposures, the role of oxidative stress and antioxidant defenses in airway inflammation, and implications for respiratory health of livestock and poultry farmers and facility workers.
Diversity and factors affecting agricultural environment exposures
Global consumption of meat, including pork (36%), poultry (33%) and beef (24%) [19], has led to increases in large scale, high-density livestock and poultry production facilities. Increased demand for meat caused 12 and 13% increases in bovine and porcine numbers, respectively, between 1990 and 2010; however, the most significant change occurred in poultry numbers – with an 82% increase [19]. Large scale food animal production programs are typically arranged in a series of growing and finishing steps, which are tightly connected to specialized CAFO-style feeding and housing systems. In the U.S. swine industry, it was estimated that 90% of pigs live their entire life -- approximately 24 weeks for market pigs, and longer for breeding stocks -- indoors [20].
The prevalence and severity of respiratory disease in farmers depend heavily on the type and intensity of animal production environment [21]. Numerous studies have reported constituents and distribution of air pollutants in and around animal production facilities, with particular emphasis on feed particles, gases [22-Pavilonis et al. 2013], microorganisms and their components [23*,24*], particle size, pH altering capacity, volatile compounds and other inorganic compounds and associated health implications [18**,25-27]. Bioaerosol composition varies considerably from region-to-region, farm-to-farm, and even room-to-room [28,29]. Comparison of pollutant levels inside swine hoop barns and conventional CAFOs revealed lower levels of hydrogen sulfide and odor in hoop barns, higher levels of cultivable bacteria in hoops and similar levels of particulate matter, endotoxin and cultivable fungi [29]. Furthermore, gut microorganisms present in organic dust produce endotoxins that can damage lung tissue and predispose animals and humans to pneumonia [30,31]. There is a direct link between organic dust-related microbial exposures such as: inhalation of gram negative and gram positive bacteria; microbial components -- lipopolysaccharide, peptidoglycans [6], fungal beta glucans [32*]; and lung disease in CAFO workers. Bioaerosol characterization studies demonstrated that microbial agents present in barn dust can deposit in the lungs of farmers and their family members [33,34]. Agricultural bioaerosols also contain fungal 1,3-β-glucan, particles in the respirable range (1 μm diameter), which can deposit deep within the lungs and cause respiratory illness [32*].
While feeding, flooring, cleaning and ventilation systems are key determinants in exposure to dust and endotoxins in livestock and poultry facilities [35**,36]; ventilation may be the most manageable and impactful. Good ventilation and robust cleaning practices can improve indoor air quality by reducing exposure to respiratory disease causing agents (e.g., microbes, fecal matter and other particulates ≤10 μm in diameter) [37,38*,39,40**,41,42]. Low ventilation rates were negatively correlated with the concentration of indoor gases -- NH3, N2O, CH4, and CO2 -- in swine barns [43], thus gaseous contaminants decreased as the ventilation rates increased [44]. The level of particulates, ammonia and endotoxin within CAFOs is linked to the severity of lung dysfunction in poultry and livestock workers [45-47]. Dust levels in excess of 2.4 mg/m3 for humans and 3.7 mg/m3 for pigs, and 0.23 mg/m3 respirable dust for both, are reported to have a negative health impact on humans and pigs in swine production facilities [48,49]. Dust concentrations tend to be lower in cage systems for laying hens compared to on-floor poultry houses for broilers. However, larger cage sizes in cage systems resulted in a decline in air quality due to increased bird activity [50]. Bedding material is a major contributing source of significantly increased dust concentrations associated with on-floor broiler buildings [37,50] and animal activity can also exacerbate already diminished air quality [51].
Regardless of the type of animal production system, the common features are a high density stocking of animals, diminished air quality and increased respiratory diseases of farmers and farm workers [52,53]. A comprehensive review of respiratory diseases, cellular and immunological responses associated with CAFO exposures was performed by May et al. 2012 [1]. A major issue related to commercial-scale, confinement-based livestock production is diminished air quality in communities in the vicinity of production facilities. For more than three decades, researchers have focused heavily on understanding the effect of livestock production dust on respiratory health of agricultural workers and local residents [30,54-59]. In rural areas there is a correlation between development of COPD and exposure to poultry/livestock facilities and grain dust [60].
Response of pigs to agricultural environments and organic dust extract exposures
Pigs have adapted to production environments and the preponderate majority of pigs live their entire life in CAFO-style buildings. To evaluate the impact of indoor production environment on pig health, studies have used exposure chambers to deliver defined pollutants [61-67]. Chronic exposure of pigs to corn dust alone did not elicit clinical respiratory symptoms or affect growth performance; however, exposing pigs to dust combined with pungent gases (i.e., sulfur dioxide and ammonia) resulted in destruction of mucosal structures (i.e., ciliated tracheal epithelia and goblet cells) [61,63]. Pigs exposed to dust consisting of corn/soybean meal and LPS via a continuous flow chamber system displayed a non-specific inflammatory response, mainly involving modulation of neutrophils and eosinophils in their bronchial alveolar lavage fluid, compared to control pigs [66]; however, these findings were confounded by the presence of peptidoglycan contamination in dust samples and air supplied to control pigs. Another study exposed pigs to dust collected from convection tubes within a commercial swine facility for 2-15 weeks with no observable effect on the respiratory system [62]; however, excessively high dust concentrations [300 mg/m3] at well-above typical levels within swine farms [10 mg/m3] resulted in alterations in feed efficiency and growth performance (i.e., average daily gains). Despite challenges with recreating animal barn conditions, it is evident that the complexity of the farm environment and exposures therein mediate respiratory disease and immunological responses in animals.
Recently, computational, ex vivo and in vitro approaches have been utilized to understand how airway morphology affects deposition of bioaerosols within the airways of animals and man. Airway geometry and tissue morphology -- specifically cartilaginous rings within the tracheobronchial region and associated mucosal lining -- are as important for understanding particle deposition mechanisms and pulmonary responses as the type of inhalation exposure [68-70]. The trachea is a distensible organ with a considerably wide range of sizes and shapes, which are controlled largely by the trachealis muscle [71]. A recent report from our group showed for the first time that pigs reared indoors and outdoors exhibit structural and cellular differences in their tracheae and airway epithelia [72*]. The study showed that pigs reared indoors have larger tracheal diameters and mucosal epithelia that are more densely packed with goblet cells when compared to outdoor reared pigs [72*]. Increased mucus production in the conducting airways is a natural defense response. This high density of goblet cells in the airway mucosa of pigs reared indoors [72*] is likely the result of hyperplasia, mediated by exposure to the indoor swine facility environment, because accumulation of goblet cells is associated with exposure to bioaerosols such as in swine barn air [73] and cigarette smoke [74]. Furthermore, rabbits and guinea pigs that were kept in a swine production building for 12 months showed signs of epithelial cell hyperplasia and metaplasia, submucosal changes and hypersensitivity pneumonitis, compared to controls that were kept in a conventional laboratory animal vivarium [75].
Macrophages are important innate responders to organic dust exposure and mediators in chronic inflammation. A recent in vitro study of pig alveolar macrophages and monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) collected from pigs showed repeated exposure to ODE reduced phagocytosis and the ability to kill bacteria [8**]. These findings are consistent with studies using human MDMs, where cells pre-exposed to ODE (ODE-MDMs) had diminished phagocytic and bacterial killing capacity compared to control MDMs that were kept in culture media [6]. What is evident from these studies is that clear similarities exist with regard to human and pig responses to organic dust exposures in vitro and such high degree of similarity may signify in vivo overlaps. In an in vitro macrophage model, swine barn dust was depleted of endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) and peptidoglycan (PGN), singly or in combination, prior to cell stimulation, and PGN seemed to be important in driving an impaired cellular response; however, a combination of LPS and PNG resulted in observations closest to responses to ODE exposure [6]. This finding highlights the complex, multifactorial nature of the inhalation exposures in CAFOs and the impact on responses. Expression of cluster of differentiation 163 (CD163) in mature porcine macrophages has been associated with entry and intracellular replication of the virus that causes porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS). PRRS is a disease of pigs that cripples the immune system by replicating within the macrophages, monocytes and dendritic cells that populate the tonsils and respiratory tract. PRRS is associated with reproductive failure and has 60-80% prevalence in swine herds in the United States [76-79]. Exposure to ODE has been shown to enhance CD163 expression [8**] which may enhance susceptibility to PRRS infection [80]; however, the exact levels of causative organic dust are not currently known. Nevertheless, an important implication for facility workers is exposure to ODE may enhance susceptibility to CD163-associated viral infection; enhanced expression of CD163 by human monocytes/macrophages correlates with susceptibility to viral infection [81,82].
Mechanisms of Organic Dust Mediated Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Defenses
Reactive oxygen (ROS) and nitrogen (RNS) species have a well-defined role in cell signaling, killing of microorganisms by phagocytes and contraction/relaxation of airway smooth muscles. Beneficial actions of nitric oxide (NO), presumably derived from inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), include enhanced cilia motility [83] and airway smooth muscle relaxation, which have been shown to improve symptoms of hyperreactive asthmatic airways in a guinea pig model [82]. However, elevated levels of ROS/RNS, as seen in obstructive airway diseases [85], have been shown to mediate fibroblast activation, mucus hypersecretion, cell injury and production of pro-inflammatory mediators by epithelial cells, and damage macromolecules DNA, lipids and proteins [84,85,86**,87-91]. Oxidative and nitrative stress is associated with loss of superoxide dismutase activity and downstream events characteristic of asthma, including apoptosis, shedding of the airway epithelium, hyperresponsiveness and diminished antioxidant activity [90,92]. Animal model studies have shown that an increase of oxidant levels correlates with a decrease in macrophage numbers. Pigs infected with Mycoplasma hyperpneumonea showed signs of oxidative stress and apoptosis in macrophages [93**,94**] and phagocyte-derived reactive species were higher in swine with viral infections compared to virus-free pigs [93**,94**].
iNOS-derived NO is a marker for airway inflammation in asthmatics in that its production has been correlated with airway eosionophilia, hyperresponsiveness and elevated peroxynitrite levels [92,95]. During times of L-arginine deficiency, iNOS-derived NO reacts with superoxide through a radical-radical reaction to produce peroxynitrite (ONOO-) [96, 97], a potent oxidant that promotes inflammation and smooth muscle contraction, thus exacerbating airway hyperresponsiveness [84]. Although exhaled NO measurement is not an established clinical approach for assessing pulmonary disease, it may be a useful supplementary diagnostic tool. Patients, including farmers, with occupational asthma have significant increases in exhaled NO levels [98]. Whereas both increased [99,100] and decreased [101] NO levels have been reported in COPD patients. These data are potentially confounded by NO detection methods and smoking history [102,103]. Educational intervention – presentations about asthma pathophysiology, medications, and workplace allergen prevention strategies -- has been effective in long-term reduction of exhaled NO levels in swine and dairy farmers with COPD [104].
Potential Therapeutic Benefits of Dietary Phytonutrients and Antioxidants
Currently, there are no therapeutics available that will significantly reduce COPD morbidity symptoms [105] and the standard of care stems from guidance provided by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) [106,107]. Antioxidants, including major endogenous enzymatic antioxidants -- superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase and catalase -- [90,91] and non-enzymatic antioxidants such as vitamins A, C, and E, and glutathione, present in dietary supplements, are important in maintaining a healthy balance of oxidants.
The commercially available antioxidant, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a direct precursor to reduced glutathione (GSH) with mucolytic properties [108,109,110], exerts its antioxidant capacity by directly reacting with oxidants [111]. Numerous reports document beneficial effect of dietary supplementation with NAC on improved gastrointestinal health and immune response in pigs that have been exposed to LPS [112*,113-115]. NAC consumption improved antioxidant capacity and reduced LPS-induced serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in pigs intraperitoneally injected with LPS [112*]. Nutritional supplements improve total antioxidant capacity and reduce systemic oxidative stress in children with asthma [116*]. Preschool aged children with a high intake of vitamins C and E had a reduced association with asthma compared to children with the lowest intake [117**]. Furthermore, taking multivitamins decreased exhaled NO and raised previously low plasma levels of vitamins A and E in asthmatic children [116*,118].
Phytonutrients are bioactive compounds from plants that can boost immunity and antioxidant capacity. The medicinal plant sorrel (Hibiscus sabdariffa, rosell), rich in phenolic acids, flavonoids and lignans, possesses antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and anti-tumerogenic properties [119-121]. In a recent study by our group, Moringa olifera Lam leaf extract – a medicinal plant rich in vitamins, including vitamin D [122] -- reduced acute lung inflammation mediated by intranasal exposure to ODE in mice that consumed water supplemented with moringa compared to control mice that drank water [123*]. The study showed mice that drank moringa tea had fewer cells present in bronchoalveolar lavage, despite having higher ODE-driven TNF-α levels, a finding that is consistent with observations of Mahajan et al. [124] in which a moringa seed extract decreased bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) cell counts, but did not affect TNF-α levels in guinea pigs exposed to aerosolized ovalbumin [124]. Consumption of a vitamin D (1,25 hydroxyvitamin D) rich diet decreased production of neutrophil chemoattractants – chemokine (C-X-C) ligand 1 and CXCL2 – and neutrophil infiltration in mice exposed to ODE compared to control mice that received standard rodent chow, or a relatively low vitamin D diet, prior to ODE exposure [125**]. Together, these observations imply dietary supplementation with antioxidants, such as vitamin D, may relieve the burden of airway inflammation seen in swine facility workers.
Conclusion
Domesticated pigs have been intensely bred to grow rapidly for market readiness in CAFOs, and their respiratory systems have become adapted to reduced air quality therein. Therefore, swine models of agricultural organic dust exposure provide valuable insight and implications for understanding mechanisms of respiratory symptoms and diseases affecting farmers and facility workers. Pigs are an excellent model for studying respiratory conditions of farmers and ranchers because they live within confinement buildings from birth to market weight (e.g., 5-7 uninterrupted months) and may develop “pre-COPD” lung signatures which will be helpful for understanding COPD in farmers. Formal human studies are needed to assess modification of effects from organic dust environment exposure by endogenous and dietary antioxidants.
Key Points.
Exposure to farm animal production environments is associated with development of chronic respiratory disease of animals, farmers and facility workers; however, the airways of pigs that are maintained within confinement facilities for several uninterrupted months show signs of adaptation.
Striking similarities exist between the responses of respiratory and immune cells of pigs and humans that have been exposed to swine production environments and organic dust extract; therefore, studies involving production animals may provide insight for understanding disease progression in farmers.
Oxidative stress is a key feature of respiratory diseases associated with the farm animal production industry and dietary supplementation with antioxidants may reduce symptoms associated with organic dust environment exposures.
Formal human studies are needed to fully understand the role of antioxidant modulation of health effects caused by organic dust exposure.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Laurie Gengenbach and Dawn Conklin for critical reading of the manuscript, and Nina Exner, Tha'Mes McDaniel, and Christi McPherson for assistance with literature searches.
Financial support and sponsorship: The project described was supported in part by United States Department of Agriculture/ National Institute of Food and Agriculture Grant NC.X-255-5-11-120-1 (to J.T.W.) and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant 1UL1TR001111. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or USDA.
Abbreviations
- BALF
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
- CAFO
concentrated animal feeding operations
- CD163
cluster of differentiation 163
- COPD
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- CXCL1
chemokine (C-X-C) ligand 1
- CXCL2
chemokine (C-X-C) ligand 2
- GSH
glutathione
- GOLD
global initiative for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- IL-6
interleukin-6
- iNOS
inducible nitric oxide synthase
- LPS
lipopolysaccharide
- MDM
monocyte-derived macrophages
- NAC
N-acetylcysteine
- NO
nitric oxide levels
- ODE
organic dust extract
- PGE2
prostaglandin E2
- PGN
peptidoglycan
- PRRS
porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome
- RNS
reactive nitrogen species
- ROS
reactive oxygen species
- SOD
Superoxide dismutase
- TNF-α
tumor necrosis factor alpha
Footnotes
Contributing Authors' Contact Information:
Chakia J. McClendon: Department of Animal Sciences, 1601 East Market Street, Greensboro, North Carolina 27411, cjmcclen@aggies.ncat.edu
Carresse L. Gerald: Department of Internal Medicine, 668 S. 41st Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68105, carresse.gerald@unmc.edu
Invited Expert Review for Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest.
References and Recommended Reading
Papers of particular interest, published within of the period of review (2013-2014), have been highlighted as:
* of special interest
** of outstanding interest
- 1.May S, Romberger DJ, Poole JA. Respiratory Health Effects of Large Animal Farming Environments. J Toxicol Environ Health B. 2012;15:524–541. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2012.744288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Girard M, Cormier Y. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Current Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;10:99–103. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283373bb8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Eduard W, Douwes J, Omenaas E, Heederik D. Do farming exposures cause or prevent asthma? Results from a study of adult Norwegian farmers. Thorax. 2004;59:381–386. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.013326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Eduard W, Pearce N, Douwes J. Chronic bronchitis, COPD, and lung function in farmers: the role of biological agents. Chest. 2009;136:716–725. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sahlander K, Larsson K, Palmberg L. Daily exposure to dust alters innate immunity. PLoS One. 2012;7:e31646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Poole JA, Alexis N. Repetitive organic dust exposure in vitro impairs macrophage differentiation and function. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122:375–382. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.05.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Poole JA, Thiele GM, Alexis ME, et al. Organic dust exposure alters monocyte-derived dendritic cell differentiation and maturation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2009a;297:L767–L776. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00107.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8**.Knetter SM, Wannemeuhler CK, Ramer-Tait AE. Organic barn dust extract exposure impairs porcine macrophage function in vitro: Implications for respiratory health. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2014;157:20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2013.10.019. **This study demonstrates that organic dust extract diminishes function of pig macrophages. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Poole JA, Wyatt TA, Oldenburg PJ, et al. Intranasal organic dust exposure-induced airway adaptive response marked by persistent lung inflammation and pathology in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2009b;296:L1085–L1095. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.90622.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Poole JA, Romberger DJ. Immunological and inflammatory responses to organic dust in agriculture. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;12:126–132. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283511d0e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pezzulo AA, Tang XX, Hoegger MJ, et al. Reduced airway surface pH impairs bacterial killing in the porcine cystic fibrosis lung. Nature. 2012;487:109–113. doi: 10.1038/nature11130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Miller T, Touch S, Shaffer T. Matrix metalloproteinase and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase expression profiles in tracheal aspirates do not adequately reflect tracheal or lung tissue profiles in neonatal respiratory distress: observations from an animal model. Crit Care Med. 2006;7:63–69. doi: 10.1097/01.pcc.0000192320.87416.1a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Turner D, Noble P, Lucas M, Mitchell H. Decreased airway narrowing and smooth muscle contraction in hyperresponsive pigs. J App Physiol. 2002;93:1296–1300. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00150.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Watremez C, Roeseler J, De Kock M, et al. An improved porcine model of stable methacholine-induced bronchospasm. Int Care Med. 2003;29:119–125. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1562-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fang X, Mou Y, Huang Z, et al. The sequence and analysis of a Chinese pig genome. GigaScience. 2012;1:16. doi: 10.1186/2047-217X-1-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Archibald AL, Bolund L, Churcher C, et al. Swine Genome Sequencing Consortium Pig genome sequence - analysis and publication strategy. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:438. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17**.Hall RJ, Leblanc-Maridor M, Wang J, et al. Metagenomic detection of viruses in aerosol samples from workers in animal slaughterhouses. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072226. **This article reports metagenomic analysis of aerosol samples from personal samplers with emphasis on viral metagenomes. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18**.Boissy RJ, Romberger DJ, Roughead WA, et al. Shotgun Pyrosequencing Metagenomic Analyses of Dusts from Swine Confinement and Grain Facilities. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e95578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095578. **This report comparative metagenomic analysis of settled dust collected from swine and grain facilities to household dust with emphasis on bacterial metagenomes. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Animal Production and Health: Sources of Meat. Third. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FOA); 2012. Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals Used in Agricultural Research and Teaching. http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/themes/en/meat/backgr_sources.html. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Plain RL, Lawrence J. Swine production. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2003;19:319–337. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0720(03)00025-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hartung J, Schulz J. Occupational and environmental risks caused by bio-aerosols in and from farm animal houses. Agric Eng Int. 2011;13:2. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pavilonis BT, O'Shaughnessy PT, Altmaier R, et al. Passive monitors to measure hydrogen sulfide near concentrated animal feeding operations. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2013;15:1271–8. doi: 10.1039/c3em00082f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23*.Masclaux FG, Sakwinska O, Charriere N, et al. Concentration of airborne Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA and MSSA), total bacteria, and endotoxins in pig farms. Ann Occup Hyg. 2013;57:550–557. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes098. *This important study reports levels of clinically important microbes in on pig farms. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24*.Viegas s, Veiga L, Figueredo P, et al. Occupational exposure to aflatoxin B1 in swine production and possible contamination sources. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2013;76:944–51. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2013.826569. *This study highlights the importance of fungal toxins in agriculture environments. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gilbert Y, Duchaine C. Bioaerosols in industrial environments: a review. Can J Civ Eng. 2009;36:1873–1886. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gerald C, McPherson C, McDaniel T, et al. A biophysiochemical analysis of settled livestock and poultry dusts. Am J Agric Biol Sci. 2014;9:153–166. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Akdeniz N, Jacobson LD, Hetchler BP. Health risk assessment of occupational exposure to hazardous volatile organic compounds in swine gestation, farrowing and nursery barns. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2013;15:563–572. doi: 10.1039/c2em30722g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hong PY, Li X, Yang X, et al. Monitoring airborne biotic contaminants in the indoor environment of pig and poultry confinement buildings. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14:1420–1431. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02726.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Thorne PS, Ansley AC, Perry SS. Concentrations of bioaerosols, odors, and hydrogen sulfide inside and downwind from two types of swine livestock operations. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2009;6:211–220. doi: 10.1080/15459620902729184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Donham KJ. Community and occupational health concerns in pork production: A review. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:E102–E111. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Muirhead MR, Alexander TJL. Managing Pig Health and the Treatment of Disease: A Reference for the Farm. 2. 5m Publishing; England: 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 32*.Lee SA, Liao CH. Size-selective assessment of agricultural workers' personal exposure to airborne fungi and fungal fragments. Sci Total Environ. 2014;466-467:725–732. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.104. *This is a recent study focusing on the contribution of airborne fungi to exposures in diverse agricultural settings. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lecours PB, Veillette M, Marsolais D, Duchaine C. Characterization of bioaerosols from dairy barns reconstructing the puzzle of occupational respiratory diseases by using molecular approaches. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:3242–3248. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07661-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hartmeyer GN, Gahrn-Hansen B, Skov RL, Kolmos HJ. Pig-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: family transition and severe pneumonia in a newborn. Scand J Infect Dis. 2010;42:318–320. doi: 10.3109/00365540903510708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35**.Basinas I, Schlunssen V, Takai H, et al. Exposure to inhalable dust and endotoxin among Danish pig farmers affected by work tasks and stable characteristics. Ann Occup Hyg. 2013;57:1005–19. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/met029. **This important article highlights particular working tasks, feed, flooring and ventilation that pose the greatest risk for bioaerosol exposures. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ellen JJ, Bottcher RW, von Wachenfelt E, Takai H. Dust levels and control methods in poultry houses. J Agric Saf Health. 2000;6:275–282. doi: 10.13031/2013.1910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Banhazi TM, Seedorg J, Rutley DL, Pitchford WS. Identification of risk factors for sub-optimal housing conditions in Australian piggeries: Part 2. Airborne Pollutants J Agric Safety Health. 2008;14:21–39. doi: 10.13031/2013.24122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38*.Ulens T, Millet S, Van Ransbeeck N, et al. The effect of different pen cleaning techniques and housing systems on indoor concentrations of particulate matter, ammonia and greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, N2O) Livest Sci. 2014;159:123–132. *This report highlights the connection of facility maintenance regimens on indoor bioaerosol exposures. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hiel D, von Schéele I, Sundblad BM, et al. Evaluation of respiratory effects related to high-pressure cleaning in a piggery with and without robot pre-cleaning. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009;35:376–383. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40**.Brown JS, Gordon T, Price O, Asgharian B. Thoracic and respirable particle definitions for human health risk assessment. Particle and Fibre Toxicology. 2013;10:12. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-10-12. **The authors estimated penetration variables of particles into the thoracic and respiratory region of male and female adults and a 10 year old child. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienist (ACGIH) TLVs and BEIs: Based on the documentation of the threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati, OH: ACGH; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 42.American Conference of Governmental Inductrial Hygienist (ACGIH) Report of the ACGIH Technical Committee on air sampling procedures. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH; 1985. Particle size-selective sampling in the workplace. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ransbeeck NV, Langenhove HV, Demeyer P. Indoor concentrations and emissions factors of particulate matter, ammonia and greenhouse gases for pig fattening facilities. Biosystems Eng. 2013;116:518–528. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kim K, Ko H. Effect of ventilation rate on gradient of aerial contaminants in the confinement pig building. Environmental Research. 2007;103:352–357. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Radon K, Danuser B, Iversen M, et al. Respiratory symptoms in European animal farmers. Eur Respir J. 2001;14:747–754. doi: 10.1183/09031936.01.17407470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Radon K, Danuser B, Iversen M, et al. Air contaminants in different European farming environments. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2002;9:41–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Donham K, Rubino M, Thedell T, Kammermeyer J. Potential health hazards of workers in swine confinement building. J Occup Med. 1977;19:383–387. doi: 10.1097/00043764-197706000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Schenker MB, Christiani D, Cormier Y. Respiratory health hazards in agriculture. Am J Resp Crit Care Med Suppl. 1998;158:S1–S76. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.supplement_1.rccm1585s1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Donham KJ, Thorne PS, Breuer GM, et al. Exposure limits related to air quality and risk assessment. Iowa Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations Air Quality Study (Final Report) 2002 Feb; [Google Scholar]
- 50.Le Bouquin S, Huneau-Salaün A, Huonnic D, et al. Aerial dust concentration in cage-houses, floor-housed, and aviary facilities for laying hens. Poult Sci. 2013;92:2827–2833. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Calvet SH, Van den Weghe H, Kosch R, Estellés F. The influence of the lighting program on broiler activity and dust production. Poult Sci. 2009;88:2504–2511. doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.American Thoracic Society (ATS) Respiratory health hazards in agriculture. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158:S1–S76. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.supplement_1.rccm1585s1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Linaker C, Smedley J. Respiratory illness in agricultural workers. Occup Med. 2002;52:451–459. doi: 10.1093/occmed/52.8.451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Donham KJ, Gustafson KE. Human occupational hazards from swine confinement, in Agricultural Respiratory Hazards: Annals of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygiene. Vol. 2. Vol. 2. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; Cincinnati, OH: 1982. pp. 137–142. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Donham KJ, Reynolds SJ, Whitten P, et al. Respiratory dysfunction in swine production facility workers: dose response relationships of environmental exposures and pulmonary function. Am J Ind Med. 1995;27:405–418. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700270309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Donham KJ, Cumro D, Reynolds SJ, Merchant JA. Dose-response relationships between occupational aerosol exposures and cross-shift declines of lung function in poultry workers: Recommendations for exposure limits. J Occ Environ Med. 2000;42:260–269. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200003000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mathisen T, Von Essen S. Hog barn dust extract augments lymphocyte adhesion to human airway epithelial cells. J Appl Physiol. 2004;96:1738–1744. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00384.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Duan H, Chai T, Liu J, et al. Source identification of airborne Escherichia coli of swine house surroundings using ERIC-PCR and REP-PCR. Environmental Research. 2009;109:511–517. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2009.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kline J, Sigurdarson S. School proximity to concentrated animal feeding operations and prevalence of asthma in students. Chest. 2006;129:1486–1491. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.6.1486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bailey KL, Meza JL, Smith LM, Romberger DJ. Agricultural exposures in patients with COPD in healthy systems serving rural areas. J Agromedicine. 2007;12:71–76. doi: 10.1300/J096v12n02_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Doig PA, Willoughby R. Response of swine to atmospheric ammonia and organic dust. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1971;159:1353–1361. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Curtis SE, Anderson CR, Simon J, et al. Effects of aerial ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and swine-house dust on rate of gain and respiratory-tract structure in swine. J Anim Sci. 1975;41:735–739. doi: 10.2527/jas1975.413735x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Martin SW, Willoughby RA. Organic dust, sulfur dioxide and the respiratory tract of swine. Arch Environ Health. 1972;25:158–165. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1972.10666155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Holst H, Edqvist LE, Kindahl H, Rylander R. Hematological, blood biochemical, and cytological bronchoalveolar lavage studies in prepubertal gilts after endotoxin inhalation and ingestion. J Vet Med. 1994;41:159–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.1994.tb00079.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Urbain B, Nicks B, Mast J, et al. Subacute effects of feed flour dust inhalation on the respiratory tract of pigs. Proc 9th Int Confer Anim Hyg; Helsinki, Finland. 1997. pp. 188–191. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Jolie R, Bäckström L, Olson L, Chase C. A 15-week experimental exposure of pigs to airborne dust with added endotoxin in a continuous flow exposure chamber. Can J Vet Res. 1999;63:129–137. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Demmers TGM, Wathes CM, Richards PA, et al. A facility for controlled exposure of pigs to airborne dusts and gases. Biosystems Engineering. 2003;84:217–230. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Russo J, Robinson R. Effects of cartilage rings on airflow and particle deposition in the trachea and main bronchi. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30:581–589. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Martonen TB, Yang Y, Xue ZQ. Influences of cartilaginous rings on tracheobronchial fluid dynamics. Inhalation Toxicol. 1994;6:185–203. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Zhang Y, Finlay WH. Measurement of the effect of cartilaginous rings on particle deposition in a proximal lung bifurcation model. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2005;39:394–9. doi: 10.1089/jam.2005.18.460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Mehta S, Myat HM. The cross-sectional shape and circumference of the human trachea. Ann Royal College Surg England. 1984;66:356–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72*.McClendon C, Pettiford S, Conklin D, et al. Airway metrics, anatomy and growth performance of pigs reared indoors and outdoors. Am J Anim Vet Sci. 2013;8:165–176. *This study demonstrates the impact of animal housing type of tracheal morphology. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Charavaryamath C, Janardhan KS, Townsend HG, et al. Multiple exposures to swine barn air induce lung inflammation and airway hyper-responsiveness. Respir Res. 2005;6:50. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-6-50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Haswell LE, Hewitt K, Thorne D, et al. Cigarette smoke total particulate matter increases mucous secreting cell numbers in vitro: a potential model for goblet cell hyperplasia. Toxicol In Vitro. 2010;24:981–987. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Donham KJ, Leininger JR. Animal studies of potential chronic lung disease of workers in swine confinement buildings. Am J Vet Res. 1984;45:926–931. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Prieto C, Castro JM. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection in the boar: a review. Theriogenology. 2005;63:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Patton JB, Rowland RR, Yoo DW, Chang KO. Modulation of CD163 receptor expression and replication of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in porcine macrophages. Virus Res. 2009;140:161–171. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2008.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Opriessnig T, Giménez-Lirola LG, Halbur PG. Polymicrobial respiratory disease in pigs. Anim Health Res Rev. 2011;12:133–148. doi: 10.1017/S1466252311000120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Gomez-Laguna J, Salguero FJ, Pallares FJ, Carrasco L. Immunopathogenesis of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome in the respiratory tract of pigs. Vet J. 2013;195:148–155. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Welch SKW, Calvert JG. A brief review of CD163 and its role in PRRSV infection. Virus Res. 2010;154:98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2010.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Tuluc F, Meshki J, Spitsin S, Douglas SD. HIV infection of macrophages is enhanced in the presence of increased expression of CD163 induced by substance P. J Leukoc Biol. 2014;96:143–150. doi: 10.1189/jlb.4AB0813-434RR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Burdo TH, Lentz MR, Autissier P, et al. Soluble CD163 made by monocyte/macrophages is a novel marker of HIV activity in early and chronic infection prior to and after anti-retroviral therapy. J Infect Dis. 2011;204:154–163. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Sisson JA. Ethanol stimulates apparent nitric oxide-dependent ciliary beat frequency in bovine airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 1995;268:L596–L600. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1995.268.4.L596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Maarsingh H, Bossenga BE, Bos IST, et al. L-arginine deficiency causes airway hyperresponsiveness after the late asthmatic reaction. Eur Respir J. 2009;34:191–199. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00105408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Day RM, Suzuki YJ. Cell proliferation, reactive oxygen and cellular glutathione. Dose Response. 2005;3:425–442. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.003.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86**.Zuo L, Otenbaker NP, Rose BA, Salisbury KS. Molecular mechanisms of reactive oxygen species-related pulmonary inflammation and asthma. Mol Immunol. 2013;56:57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2013.04.002. **This is an important review article of the relationship between reactive oxygen species and inflammation in asthma within the context of current clinical and scientific research. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Suski JM, Lebiedzinska M, Bonora M, et al. Relationship between mitochondrial membrane potential and ROS formation. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;810:183–205. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-382-0_12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Henricks PA, Nijkamp FP. Reactive oxygen species as mediators in asthma. Pulm Pharmacol Therapeut. 2001;14:409–420. doi: 10.1006/pupt.2001.0319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Valko M, Rhodes CJ, Moncol J, et al. Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer. Chem-Biol Interact. 2006;160:1–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2005.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Sugiura H, Ichinose M. Oxidative and nitrative stress in bronchial asthma. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2008;10:785–797. doi: 10.1089/ars.2007.1937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Bowler RP, Crapo JD. Oxidative Stress in Airways: is there a role for extracellular superoxide dismutase? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:S38–S43. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2206014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Comhair SA, Xu W, Ghosh S, et al. Superoxide Dismutase Inactivation in Pathophysiology of Asthmatic Airway Remodeling and Reactivity. Am J Pathol. 2005;166:663–674. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62288-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93**.Bai F, Ni B, Liu M, et al. Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae-derived lipid-associated membrane proteins induce apoptosis in porcine alveolar macrophage via increasing nitric oxide production, oxidative stress, and caspase-3 activation. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2013;155:155–61. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2013.07.004. **The findings of this study imply that mycoplasma species may impair the immune system by inducing apoptosis in macrophages. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94**.Deblanc C, Robert F, Pinard T, et al. Pre-infection of pigs with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae induces oxidative stress that influences outcomes of a subsequent infection with a swine influenza virus of H1N1 subtype. Vet Microbiol. 2013;162:643–51. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.11.028. **This recent study highlights the importance of oxidative stress in mediating pulmonary disease outcomes in pigs. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Prado C, Leick-Maldonado E, Yano L, et al. Effects of Nitric Oxide Synthases in Chronic Allergic Airway Inflammation and Remodeling. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2006;35:457–465. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2005-0391OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Parks NJ, Krohn KJ, Mathis CA, et al. Nitrogen-13-labeled nitrite and nitrate distribution and metabolism after intratracheal administration. Science. 1981;212:58–60. doi: 10.1126/science.7209517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Verhaar MC, Westerweel PE, van Zonneveld AJ, Rabelink TJ. Free radical production by dysfunctional eNOS. Heart. 2004;90:494–495. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.029405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Swierczyńska-Machura D, Krakowiak A, Wiszniewska M, et al. Exhaled nitric oxide levels after specific inahalatory challenge test in subjects with diagnosed occupational asthma. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2008;21:219–25. doi: 10.2478/v10001-008-0024-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Corradi M, Majori M, Cacciani GC, et al. Increased exhaled nitric oxide in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 1999;54:572–5. doi: 10.1136/thx.54.7.572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Montuschi P, Kharitonov SA, Barnes PJ. Exhaled carbon monoxide and nitric oxide in COPD. Chest. 2001;120:496–501. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.2.496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Clini E, Bianchi L, Pagani M, Ambrosino N. Endogenous nitric oxide in patients with stable COPD: correlates with severity of disease. Thorax. 1998;53:881–3. doi: 10.1136/thx.53.10.881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Ricciardolo FL. Multiple roles of nitric oxide in the airways. Thorax. 2003;58:175–82. doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.2.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Schafroth Török S, Leuppi JD. Bronchial hyper-responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Swiss Med Wkly. 2007;137:385–391. doi: 10.4414/smw.2007.11677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Dressel H, Gross C, de la Motte D, et al. Educational interventions in farmers with occupational asthma: long-term effect on exhaled nitric oxide. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2009;19:49–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Szczyrek M, Krawczyk P, Milanowski J, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in farmers and agricultural workers – an overview. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011;18:310–313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Rabe KF, Hurd S, Anzueto A, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176:532–555. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200703-456SO. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Rice KL, Dewan N, Bloombfield HE, et al. Disease management program for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:890–896. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200910-1579OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Sadowska AM, Manuel YKB, De Backer WA. Antioxidant and anti inflammatory efficacy of NAC in the treatment of COPD: discordant in vitro and in vivo dose-effects: a review. Pulmonary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2007;20:9–22. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2005.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Wu G, Fang YZ, Yang S, et al. Glutathione metabolism and its implications for health. J Nutr. 2004;134:489–492. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.3.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Fishbane S. N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:281–287. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02590607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Stolarek R, Bialasiewicz P, Nowak D. N-acetylcysteine effect on the luminol dependent chemiluminescence pattern of reactive oxygen species generation by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Pulmon Pharmacol Ther. 2002;15:385–392. doi: 10.1006/pupt.2002.0369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112*.Yi D, Hou Y, Wang L, et al. Dietary N-acetylcysteine supplementation alleviates liver injury in lipopolysaccharide-challenged piglets. Br J Nutr. 2014;111:46–54. doi: 10.1017/S0007114513002171. *Consumption of antioxidants improves health of pigs exposed to LPS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Hou Y, Wang L, Zhang W, et al. Protective effects of N-acetylcysteine on intestinal functions of piglets challenged with lipopolysaccharide. Amino Acids. 2012;43:1233–1242. doi: 10.1007/s00726-011-1191-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Hou Y, Wang L, Yi D, et al. N-acetylcysteine reduces inflammation in the small intestine by regulating redox, EGF and TLR4 signaling. Amino Acids. 2013;45:513–522. doi: 10.1007/s00726-012-1295-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Qui Y, Zhang J, Liu Y, et al. The combination effects of acetaminophen and N-acetylcysteine on cytokines production and NF-kB activation of lipopolysaccharide-challenged piglet mononuclear phagocytes in vitro and in vivo. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2013;152:381–388. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2013.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116*.Fabian E, Poloskey P, Kosa L, et al. Nutritional supplements and plasma antioxidants in childhood asthma. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2013;125:309–15. doi: 10.1007/s00508-013-0359-6. *This study demonstrates that taking multivitamins enhance antioxidant levels in asthmatic children. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117**.Wilkinson M, Hart A, Milan SJ, Sugumar K. Vitamin C and E for asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;6:CD010749. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010749.pub2. **This is an important recent review article of vitamin supplementation in the management of asthma or bronchoconstriction. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Mezzetti A, Lapenna D, Pierdomenico SD, et al. Vitamins E, C and lipid peroxidation in plasma and material tissue of smokers and non-smokers. Atherosclerosis. 1995;112:91–99. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(94)05403-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Fullerton MSC, Verghese M, Walker L, et al. Determination of antioxidant contents in red sorrel and its anticarcinogenic potential in azoxymethane induced colonic aberrant crypt foci. J Res Phytochem. 2008;2:69–76. [Google Scholar]
- 120.Fullerton M, Khatiwada J, Johnson JU, et al. Determination of antimicrobial activity of sorrel (Hibiscus sabdariffa) on Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolated from food, veterinary, and clinical samples. J Med Food. 2011;14:950–956. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2010.0200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Olaleye MT. Cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity of methanolic extract of Hibiscus sabdariffa. J Med Plant Res. 2007;1:9–13. [Google Scholar]
- 122.Anwar R, Lativ S, Ashraf M, Gilani AH. Moringa olifera: A food plant with multiple medicinal uses. Phytotherapy Res. 2007;21:17–25. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123*.McKnight M, Allen J, Waterman JT, et al. Moringa tea blocks acute lung inflammation induced by swine confinement dust through a mechanism involving TNF-a expression, C-JUN N-terminal kinase activation and neutrophil regulation. Am J Immunol. 2014;10:73–87. *This article reports an important role for a medicinal plant in reducing lung inflammation associated with organic dust extract exposure. [Google Scholar]
- 124.Mahajan SG, Banerjee A, Chauhan BF, et al. Inhibitory effect of n-butyl fraction of Moringa Olifera seeds on ovalbumin-induced airway inflammation in a guinea pig model of asthma. Int J Toxicol. 2009;28:519–527. doi: 10.1177/1091581809345165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125**.Golden GA, Wyatt TA, Romberger DJ, et al. Vitamin D treatment modulates organic dust-induced cellular and airway inflammatory consequences. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2013;27:77–86. doi: 10.1002/jbt.21467. **This article reports an important role for vitamin D in reducing lung inflammation associated with organic dust extract exposure. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]