Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2016 Jan 31;67(6):1919–1933. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw013

Interactions between 2-Cys peroxiredoxins and ascorbate in autophagosome formation during the heat stress response in Solanum lycopersicum

Fei Cheng 1,2,, Ling-Ling Yin 1,, Jie Zhou 1, Xiao-Jian Xia 1, Kai Shi 1, Jing-Quan Yu 1,3, Yan-Hong Zhou 1,3,*, Christine Helen Foyer 4
PMCID: PMC4783371  PMID: 26834179

Highlight

2-Cys peroxiredoxins fulfil a pivotal role in heat stress tolerance in Solanum lycopersicum via interactions with ascorbate-dependent pathways and autophagy.

Key words: antioxidant metabolism, autophagy, 2-Cys peroxiredoxin, heat tolerance, oxidized protein, Solanum, lycopersicum, water-water cycle.

Abstract

2-Cys peroxiredoxins (2-CPs) function in the removal of hydrogen peroxide and lipid peroxides but their precise roles in the induction of autophagy have not been characterized. Here we show that heat stress, which is known to induce oxidative stress, leads to the simultaneous accumulation of transcripts encoding 2-CPs and autophagy proteins, as well as autophagosomes, in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants. Virus-induced gene silencing of the tomato peroxiredoxin genes 2-CP1, 2-CP2, and 2-CP1/2 resulted in an increased sensitivity of tomato plants to heat stress. Silencing 2-CP2 or 2-CP1/2 increased the levels of transcripts associated with ascorbate biosynthesis but had no effect on the glutathione pool in the absence of stress. However, the heat-induced accumulation of transcripts associated with the water-water cycle was compromised by the loss of 2-CP1/2 functions. The transcript levels of autophagy-related genes ATG5 and ATG7 were higher in plants with impaired 2-CP1/2 functions, and the formation of autophagosomes increased, together with an accumulation of oxidized and insoluble proteins. Silencing of ATG5 or ATG7 increased the levels of 2-CP transcripts and protein but decreased heat stress tolerance. These results demonstrate that 2-CPs fulfil a pivotal role in heat stress tolerance in tomato, via interactions with ascorbate-dependent pathways and autophagy.

Introduction

Plants are continuously exposed to changing environmental conditions. Plant functions can be compromised by exposure to excess light, extremes of temperature, limited nutrient or water availability, and pathogen/insect attack. An increased understanding of plant responses to these stresses, which disturb cellular homeostasis, is required to develop better strategies for crop improvement. All abiotic stress conditions result in an accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), allowing oxidative signalling that leads to the changes in gene expression which underpin acclimation and adaptation to stress (Foyer and Noctor, 2005; Gill and Tuteja, 2010). Plants have evolved mechanisms that protect photosystem (PS) II and the electron transport system from photo-oxidative stress, including xanthophyll cycle-dependent energy dissipation, photorespiration, the D1 repair cycle, and cyclic electron flow around PSI. Moreover, ROS are scavenged by a network of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants, including ascorbate peroxidases (APXs) and peroxiredoxins (PRXs; Asada et al., 1998; Noctor and Foyer, 1998, 2005; Awad et al., 2015). Proteins that have become oxidized or otherwise modified as a result of stress can be removed by autophagy (Xiong et al., 2007b; Slavikova et al., 2008).

PRXs are a large family of thiol-based peroxidases that are widely distributed in all living organisms, from archaebacteria to mammals (Pulido et al., 2009). In plants, PRXs have been organized into four distinct subclasses based on their genome sequences: 1-Cys PRX, 2-Cys PRX (2-CP), PRX II, and PRX Q (Dietz et al., 2002; Rouhier and Jacquot, 2002). The enzymatic functions of PRXs are largely based on the presence of redox-active thiol groups (Petersson et al., 2006). In the case of 2-CPs, which are found in chloroplasts, an intermolecular disulfide bridge is established between the catalytic Cys of one monomer and the Cys of a second monomer, leading to the formation of a homodimer (Horling et al., 2002). Previously, we have reported that the disulfide bridge of 2-CPs in chloroplasts is reduced by thioredoxin-m (TRX-m) and thioredoxin-f (TRX-f) in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants (Cheng et al., 2014). PRXs catalyse the detoxification of a broad range of peroxides, including H2O2 and alkyl hydroperoxides. They are thus crucial to the antioxidative defences of plants that protect against the harmful effects of abiotic stress (Baier and Dietz, 1999; Tripathi et al., 2009).

The water-water cycle has a key role in photoprotection. In the classic water-water cycle, superoxide radicals generated by the one-electron reduction of O2 by PSI are rapidly converted to H2O2 by Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase (Cu/Zn-SOD) or Fe-SOD in the chloroplast (Asada, 1999). H2O2 is then detoxified and reduced to H2O by the ascorbate-glutathione cycle, which consists of APX, monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDAR), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), and glutathione reductase (GR; Foyer and Noctor, 2005). Ascorbate and glutathione also function in combination with the ascorbate-glutathione cycle to reduce H2O2 and to dissipate excess excitation energy in chloroplasts (Foyer and Halliwell, 1976; Foyer and Noctor, 2005). Arabidopsis thaliana mutants lacking either the thylakoid APX (tAPX) or the stromal APX (sAPX) accumulated higher levels of H2O2 and oxidized proteins under photo-oxidative stress than the wild-type plants (Maruta et al., 2010). However, Arabidopsis sapx tapx double mutants did not show large decreases in photoprotective capacity even under high light stress (Giacomelli et al., 2007; Kangasjarvi et al., 2008; Maruta et al., 2010). Molecular genetic evidence supports the view that the plastid-localized 2-CPs work together with the tAPX to remove H2O2 from the chloroplasts (Awad et al., 2015).

Exposure to stress conditions often results in an increased abundance of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants, including those involved in the water-water cycle (Foyer and Noctor, 2005). It is well established that heat stress results in a burst of ROS and that the heat-induced accumulation of ROS is required to elicit the heat shock response in gene expression. However, the roles of 2-CPs in mediating the heat shock response have not been characterized. Similarly, recent studies have shown that ROS induces the expression of genes associated with autophagy, suggesting that ROS are an important signal for the induction of the autophagy pathway (Xiong et al., 2007a, 2007b; Perez-Perez et al., 2012). Antisense suppression of a 2-CP in Arabidopsis specifically enhanced the levels of transcripts and activities of enzymes associated with ascorbate metabolism but had no effect on the glutathione pool (Baier et al., 2000). The Arabidopsis 2cpa 2cpb double mutants that are deficient in both of the chloroplast 2-Cys PRXs showed an increased sensitivity to high light stress and had lower photosynthetic efficiencies than either the wild type or tapx knockout mutants (Awad et al., 2015). The plastid-localized 2-CPs therefore play a key role in the protection of photosynthesis against the harmful effects of excess illumination. Triple mutants that are deficient in both the plastid 2-Cys PRXs and the tAPX (2cpa 2cpb tapx) had significantly higher levels of oxidative stress-responsive transcripts than the 2cpa 2cpb mutants or the wild-type plants (Awad et al., 2015). The 2-CP and tAPX pathways therefore operate together in fulfilling water-water cycle functions and so modulate the H2O2 signal arising in the chloroplasts. It is therefore important to understand the relationships between 2-Cys PRXs and the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in other stress situations that involve significant ROS accumulation, such as heat stress, and in the oxidative stress-dependent induction of autophagy.

Autophagy is a highly conserved intracellular degradation system in eukaryotes for the removal and recycling of cytoplasmic components, including damaged proteins and organelles (Klionsky, 2005). Autophagy is induced in plants during abiotic stresses, such as oxidative, high salt, and osmotic stress conditions and infection by the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea (Slavikova et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2009; Lai et al., 2011). Autophagy-defective RNAi-AtATG18a transgenic lines are hypersensitive to ROS, salt, and drought (Xiong et al., 2007a, 2007b; Liu et al., 2009). Moreover, autophagy mutants exhibit enhanced susceptibility to the necrotrophic pathogens B. cinerea and Alternaria brassicicola (Lai et al., 2011; Lenz et al., 2011). Transgenic plants that are defective in the autophagy pathway (RNAi-AtATG18a) accumulate a higher level of oxidized proteins compared to controls (Xiong et al., 2007a, 2007b). Autophagy is therefore a central pathway for the degradation of oxidized proteins during oxidative stress. Recently, we found that heat stress induces the expression of autophagy-related genes (ATG) and the accumulation of autophagosomes in tomato plants (Zhou et al., 2014). Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of several tomato ATG genes resulted in an increased sensitivity to heat stress, suggesting the involvement of autophagy in the heat stress response in tomato plants.

Many important crop species, such as tomato, are frequently faced with heat-induced oxidative stress during growth and fruit production. We therefore analysed the relationships between 2-CPs and autophagy in the heat stress tolerance response of tomato plants. VIGS was used to analyse the roles of the tomato 2-CP genes and ATG genes in the heat stress response. The data not only demonstrate that 2-CPs and autophagy play a critical role in heat tolerance in tomato, but also provide new insights into the relationships between 2-CPs and autophagy.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials, virus-induced gene silencing constructs and Agrobacterium-mediated virus infection

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Condine Red) seeds were germinated in a growth medium composed of a mixture of peat and vermiculite (7:3, v:v) in trays in a growth chamber. When the first true leaf was fully expanded, the seedlings were transplanted into plastic pots (15cm diameter and 15cm depth, one seedling per pot) containing the same medium and were watered daily with Hoagland’s nutrient solution. The growth conditions were as follows: a 14-h photoperiod, temperature of 25/20°C (day/night) and photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) maintained at 200 µmol m−2 s−1.

To specifically silence 2-CP1, 2-CP2, ATG5, and ATG7, a 200–500bp section of the 3′ untranslated region was PCR-amplified with the primers listed in Supplementary Table S1, available at JXB online (The Tomato Genome Consortium 2012), and cloned into the XhoI-SacI or EcoRI-XhoI site of pTRV2. For the co-silencing of 2-CP1/2, a 531bp fragment of 2-CP1 (nucleotides 447–977) was PCR-amplified using the forward primer CGGCGCTCGAGGAATTCATCAAGGTTAAAT and the reverse primer GGCGCGAGCTCTTATATGGATGCAAAGTAC; the primers contained XhoI and SacI restriction sites. The PCR fragment was inserted into the XhoI-SacI site within the multiple cloning region of the pTRV2 vector. The pTRV2-2-CP1, pTRV2-2-CP2, co-silencing pTRV2-2-CP1/2, pTRV2-ATG5, and pTRV2-ATG7 VIGS constructs were confirmed by sequencing and then transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101.

Agrobacterium-mediated virus infection was performed as previously described (Ekengren et al., 2003). An Agrobacterium culture carrying an empty pTRV2 vector was also infiltrated into a set of plants that were used as a control. The inoculated plants were maintained at 20–22°C in a growth chamber with a 14-h day length. After approximately 4 weeks, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed to determine the gene silencing efficiency before the plants were used in assays. The expression of 2-CP1, 2-CP2, ATG5, and ATG7 in pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, pTRV-2-CP1/2, pTRV-ATG5, and pTRV-ATG7 plants is shown in Supplementary Fig. S1A, B, available at JXB online.

Experimental design

There were three experiments in this study. In experiment I, plants at the six-leaf stage were placed at 22°C and 45°C in growth chambers (ConvironE15; Conviron, Manitoba, Canada) with 200 μmol m−2 s−1 PPFD for 7h. The heat stress treatment used in these studies did not lead to the death of any of the plants. Leaf samples were harvested at different time points from heated or unheated tomato plants, then frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C prior to gene expression and 2-CP redox status analyses. In experiment II and III, 2-CP and ATG VIGS plants at the six-leaf stage, respectively, were placed at 22°C and 45°C with 200 μmol m−2 s−1 PPFD in growth chambers for 7h and then immediately analysed for electrolyte leakage or maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm). Leaf samples were harvested at different time points from heated or unheated tomato plants, then frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C prior to gene expression and protein analyses and antioxidant assays.

Analysis of heat stress tolerance

Electrolyte leakage in the leaves was determined as previously described (Hong et al., 2003). Fv/Fm was measured with IMAGING-PAM (IMAG-MAXI; Heinz Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) after the whole plants were dark-adapted for 30min. Minimal fluorescence (Fo) was measured during the weak measuring pulses and maximal fluorescence (Fm) was measured by an 0.8-s pulse of light at 4000 µmol m−2 s−1. Fv/Fm was then calculated as (Fm − Fo)/Fm. Fv/Fm were determined using the whole area of the fifth leaf from the bottom. The light-saturated rate of CO2 assimilation (A sat) was measured with an open gas exchange system (LI-6400; LI-COR, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) on the fifth leaf of each plant under a CO2 concentration of 380 µmol mol−1, a saturating PPFD of 1500 µmol m−2 s−1, a leaf temperature of 25±1.5°C and a relative air humidity of 80–90%.

Antioxidant assays

For antioxidant enzyme assays, leaf tissues (0.3g) were ground with a 2mL ice-cold buffer containing 50mM phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.8), 0.2mM EDTA, 2mM L-ascorbic acid, and 2% (w/v) polyvinylpyrrolidone. Homogenates were centrifuged at 12 000 g for 20min, and the resulting supernatants were used to determine enzyme activity. The activity of SOD, catalase (CAT), APX, MDAR, DHAR, and GR were measured following the previously described protocol (Xia et al., 2009). All spectrophotometric analyses were conducted on a Shimadzu UV-2410PC spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Reduced ascorbate (AsA), dehydroascorbate (DHA), reduced glutathione (GSH), and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) content was measured as previously described (Jiang et al., 2013).

Total RNA extraction and gene expression analysis

Total RNA was isolated from tomato leaves using the TRIZOL reagent (Sangon, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA template for qRT-PCR was synthesized from 2 µg of total RNA using a ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). Gene-specific primers were designed based on their cDNA sequences and employed for amplification, as described in Supplementary Table S2, available at JXB online. For the qRT-PCR analysis, we amplified PCR products in triplicate using iQ SYBR Green SuperMix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) in 25 µL qRT-PCR assays. The PCR was performed using an iCycler iQ 96-well real-time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), and the cycling conditions consisted of denaturation at 95°C for 3min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30s, annealing at 58°C for 30s, and extension at 72°C for 30s. The tomato actin7 gene was used as an internal control. The relative gene expression was calculated as described by Livak and Schmittgen (2001).

Non-reducing SDS-PAGE, separation of soluble and insoluble proteins, and western blotting

Total, soluble, and insoluble proteins from tomato leaves were assayed before and after heat treatment, as previously described (Zhou et al., 2013). The concentrations of total, soluble, and insoluble proteins were determined using a protein assay kit (Bio-Rad), and BSA was used as a standard. Oxidized proteins from the soluble protein fraction were detected using an OxyBlot protein oxidation detection kit (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The total, dimer forms, and monomer forms of 2-CPs were determined by non-reducing SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis as described previously (Cheng et al., 2014). For the total protein abundance analysis of 2-CPs, β-mercaptoethanol was applied as the reducing agent in the protein extraction solution and protein samples were boiled before loading onto SDS-PAGE, in which only the monomer form could be detected on a western blot image. For the determination of dimer and monomer forms of 2-CPs, β-mercaptoethanol and boiling were omitted (Muthuramalingam et al., 2010). 2-CPs were detected with a polyclonal antibody against 2-CysP (AbP80255-A-SE; Beijing Protein Innovation, Beijing, China). After incubation with a horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA, USA), the antigen-antibody complexes were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Perkin Elmer, Wellesley, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Detection of autophagosome structures

For visualization of autophagosomes, tomato leaves were vacuum-infiltrated with 500 µM of the fluorescence dye monodansylcadaverine (MDC) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 1h after heat stress and kept for an additional hour in darkness before visualization (Xiong et al., 2007b; Wang et al., 2013). MDC-indicative autophagic structures were detected by a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica TCS SL; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), excited by a wavelength of 405nm and detected at 400–580nm. Chloroplast autofluorescence was excited at 453nm and detected at 580–695nm.

To visualize autophagic structures at the subcellular level, excised tomato leaves were immediately cut and fixed according to the method described by Chen et al. (2009) and Wang et al. (2013). Sections were then examined using a TEM (H7650, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 75kV.

Statistical analysis

The experimental design was a completely randomized block design with four replicates. Each replicate contained at least 10 plants. Statistical analysis of the bioassays was performed using the SAS statistical package. The differences between the treatment means were separated using Tukey’s test at a level of P < 0.05.

Results

2-CPs expression in response to heat stress in tomato

A database (Tomato Genome Sequencing Project) search based on sequence similarity with the predicted chloroplast 2-CPs of A. thaliana indicated two chloroplast 2-CP nucleotide sequences in S. lycopersicum: 2-CP1 (Solyc10g082030) and 2-CP2 (Solyc01g007740). A phylogenetic tree built from the alignment of the two proteins showed high similarity to the sequences of At2-CPA and At2-CPB, suggesting that they are orthologs of 2-CPA and 2-CPB in Arabidopsis (see Supplementary Fig. S2 at JXB online).

To determine whether 2-CPs are involved in the heat stress response in tomato, we first examined 2-CP1 and 2-CP2 expression during heat stress (Fig. 1A, B). While the levels of 2-CP1 and 2-CP2 transcripts were constant throughout the 7h period of the experiment in plants kept at 22°C, the abundance of transcripts encoding both 2-CP1 and 2-CP2 increased within 1h after the transfer to 45°C, and they remained high for 4h before declining to the same levels as in the controls maintained at 22°C. Western blot analysis showed that the 2-CPs monomer/dimer ratios were decreased from 4.50 at 0h to 2.92, 2.45, 2.12, and 0.81 at 1, 3, 5, and 7h respectively after the onset of the heat treatment (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The gene expression (A and B) and redox state (C) of 2-CPs in response to heat at 45°C in tomato. Leaf samples were collected at the indicated times. The protein samples were separated by non-reducing SDS-PAGE and analysed by a western blot analysis with an anti-2-CP antibody. The ratio of 2-CP monomer to dimer was quantified by Quantity One software. The data are the means of four replicates with SD. Different letters indicate significant differences between the treatments according to Tukey’s test (P < 0.05).

Heat tolerance is compromised in tomato plants lacking 2-CPs

The two tomato 2-CP genes, 2-CP1 and 2-CP2, were silenced individually or in combination using a VIGS method. A transcript analysis of the leaflets in the middle of the fifth fully expanded leaf revealed that the 2-CP1 and 2-CP2 transcripts in the 2-CP1-silenced (pTRV-2-CP1), 2-CP2-silenced (pTRV-2-CP2), and 2-CP1 and 2-CP2-co-silenced (pTRV-2-CP1/2) VIGS plants were reduced to ~21–35% of the levels in pTRV control plants (see Supplementary Fig. S1A at JXB online). The pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants grew more slowly than the pTRV plants. The co-silenced pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants had the most pronounced slow-growth phenotype compared to the pTRV control plants (Supplementary Fig. 1B, C).

Under optimal growth conditions, the silencing of either 2-CP1 or 2-CP2 resulted in lower 2-CP protein accumulation (Fig. 2A). Moreover, co-silencing of 2-CP1 and 2-CP2 (pTRV-2-CP1/2) almost completely abolished 2-CP protein accumulation (Fig. 2A). The exposure to heat stress resulted in increased 2-CP protein accumulation in the pTRV control, pTRV-2-CP1, and pTRV-2-CP2 plants but 2-CP accumulation was negligible in the pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants. Heat-induced 2-CP accumulation in the pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants was always lower than that in the pTRV plants. Meanwhile, a decrease in the 2-CPs monomer/dimer ratio was found in the gene-silenced plants after exposure to heat stress compared to the heat-treated pTRV plants (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Compromised heat tolerance phenotypes of partially 2-CPs-silenced plants. (A) The total protein abundance and redox state of 2-CPs in VIGS plants in response to heat stress. (B) Electrolyte leakage in response to heat stress. (C) Light saturated rate of CO2 assimilation (A sat) in response to heat stress. (D) Images of Fv/Fm in response to heat stress. (E) Average Fv/Fm values in response to heat stress. VIGS plants were placed at 22°C and 45°C in growth chambers for 7h and immediately measured for electrolyte leakage and Fv/Fm, and leaf samples were collected for 2-CPs protein abundance analysis. A sat was measured after the plants were recovered at 25°C for 24h. The data are the means of four replicates with SD. Different letters indicate significant differences between the treatments according to Tukey’s test (P < 0.05).

The light-saturated rates of CO2 assimilation (A sat), electrolyte leakage, and the Fv/Fm values, that is, the maximum quantum yield of PSII, determined in fully expanded leaves in the 2-CP1-, 2-CP2-, and 2-CP1/2-silenced plants were similar to those of the pTRV control plants in the absence of stress (Fig. 2BE). After a 7h exposure to heat stress at 45°C, however, the electrolyte leakage values for the pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants were respectively 22%, 85%, and 99% higher than those of the pTRV plants (Fig. 2B). Similarly, heat stress caused a 15–30% decrease in the Fv/Fm ratios in the pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants relative to the pTRV control plants (Fig. 2D, E). Symptoms of heat-induced dehydration were visible only on the oldest leaves of the pTRV control plants. In contrast, most of the leaves on the pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants exhibited extensive wilting after the heat stress treatment (see Supplementary Fig. S1C). Similarly, A sat was lower in the pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, and pTRV-2-CP1/2 leaves than those of the pTRV control plants after exposure to heat stress (Fig. 2C). These results show that partial silencing of 2-CP1, 2-CP2, and 2-CP1/2 increased the sensitivity of tomato plants to heat stress, suggesting that 2-CP1 and 2-CP2 play important roles in the heat stress response in tomato.

2-CPs-induced changes in antioxidant metabolism under heat stress

To examine whether 2-CPs are involved in the regulation of the antioxidative response in tomato, we examined changes in the transcript levels of seven antioxidant genes in the different VIGS plants in the absence or presence of heat stress. Of the transcripts measured in these studies, Cu/Zn-SOD, sAPX, tAPX, MDAR, DHAR2, and GR are involved in the scavenging of ROS in the chloroplasts, whilst CAT2 plays key roles in the scavenging of cytosolic ROS and ROS generated by photorespiration in the peroxisomes, respectively (Fig. 3; Supplementary Fig. S3 at JXB online). While there were no significant changes in the Cu/Zn-SOD, sAPX, and MDAR transcripts in the pTRV-2-CP1 or pTRV-2-CP2 leaves in the absence of stress, these transcripts were increased in the pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants relative to the pTRV control plants (Fig. 3A). The heat treatment led to significant increases in the levels of all of these transcripts, with increases ranging from 1.5-fold to 3.5-fold in the different pTRV plants. However, the silencing of 2-CP1, 2-CP2, and 2-CP1/2 resulted in different responses in antioxidant transcript levels to heat stress. In the pTRV-2-CP1 plants, Cu/Zn–SOD, sAPX, tAPX, and GR transcript levels increased in response to heat stress relative to the pTRV control plants, whereas MDAR and DHAR2 transcript levels did not (Fig. 3A). In contrast, heat stress in the pTRV-2-CP2 and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants decreased the levels of all the measured antioxidant transcripts, with the exception of GR level, which was slightly increased (Fig. 3A). Moreover, the silencing of 2-CP1, 2-CP2, and 2-CP1/2 did not compromise heat-induced increases in CAT2 transcripts (Supplementary Fig. S3A).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Changes in the levels of transcripts associated with the water-water cycle (A) and the activities of water-water-cycle-related enzymes (B) in response to heat stress in 2-CPs-silenced plants. Leaf samples were collected after 7h of heat stress. The data are the means of four replicates with SDs. Different letters indicate significant differences between the treatments according to Tukey’s test (P < 0.05).

Silencing of 2-CP1, 2-CP2, and 2-CP1/2 led to different responses in the activities of SOD, APX, MDAR, DHAR, and GR. SOD activity was induced in pTRV-2-CP2 and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants but not in TRV-2-CP1 plants. In general, silencing of 2-CP1, 2-CP2, and 2-CP1/2 did not alter the activities of MDAR, DHAR, or GR. The only exception was the activity of MDAR in TRV-2-CP1/2 plants, which was increased. Interestingly, APX activity was significantly higher as a result of silencing 2-CP1, 2-CP2, or 2-CP1/2 (Fig. 3B). Heat treatment resulted in significant increases in the activities of SOD, APX, MDAR, DHAR, GR, and CAT in the pTRV control plants (Fig. 3B; Supplementary Fig. S3B). This finding is consistent with the observed changes in the transcripts encoding the corresponding antioxidant enzymes (Fig. 3A). The heat-induced increases in the activities of these enzymes were largely compromised in the pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants relative to the pTRV controls (Fig. 3B; Supplementary Fig. S3B).

The total glutathione pool (GSH + GSSG) and the GSH to GSSG ratios in the leaves of pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants were not significantly different from those of the pTRV control plants measured in the absence of stress (Fig. 4A). While the heat treatment resulted in only a small decrease in leaf GSH content, there was a significant increase in leaf GSSG content, leading to a substantial decrease in the leaf GSH to GSSG ratios of the heat-stressed pTRV plants (Fig. 4A; Supplementary Fig. S4A at JXB online). The heat induced decreases in leaf GSH to GSSG ratios were more pronounced in the 2-CP1, 2-CP2, and 2-CP1/2-silenced plants than in the pTRV controls (Fig. 4A).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Changes in glutathione and ascorbate homeostasis and relative expression of critical genes involved in ascorbate biosynthesis in response to heat stress in VIGS plants. (A) Changes in glutathione homeostasis. (B) Changes in ascorbate homeostasis. (C) Changes in the transcript of genes involved in ascorbate biosynthesis. Leaf samples were collected after 7h of heat stress. The data are the means of four replicates with SDs. Different letters indicate significant differences between the treatments according to Tukey’s test (P < 0.05).

While there were no significant changes in the levels of the total ascorbate (AsA + DHA) pool size as a result of heat stress in pTRV control plants, there was a decrease in the leaf AsA contents and an increase in the leaf DHA (oxidized ascorbate) levels, leading to decreased AsA to DHA ratios (Fig. 4B; Supplementary Fig. S4B). In the absence of stress, the level of the ascorbate pool was higher in the pTRV-2-CP1/2 leaves than in the pTRV control plants (Fig. 4B; Supplementary Fig. S4B). This increase was mostly attributed to higher levels of DHA in the pTRV-2-CP1/2 leaves. The heat stress treatment led to significant decreases in the size of the leaf ascorbate (AsA + DHA) pool in the pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, and pTRV-2-CP1/2 leaves, which was accompanied by significant decreases in the AsA to DHA ratio (Fig. 4B; Supplementary Fig. S4B). Moreover, silencing of 2-CP1, 2-CP2, and 2-CP1/2 induced increases in the levels of GDP-D-mannose 3’,5’-epimerase (GME2), GDP-L-galactose phosphorylase (VTC2/5), and L-galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase (GLDH) transcripts, which are involved in ascorbate biosynthesis in the absence of stress (Fig. 4C). GME1 transcripts were higher only in pTRV-2-CP2 and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants, not in pTRV-2-CP1 plants. Exposure to heat stress led to significant increases in the levels of VTC2/5 transcripts but had little effect on GME1, GME2, or GLDH transcripts in the pTRV control plants (Fig. 4C). In contrast, while heat stress decreased the levels of these transcripts in the pTRV-2-CP2 and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants, it had little effect on these transcripts in pTRV-2-CP1 leaves (Fig. 4C). These results suggest that 2-CPs influence the regulation of ascorbate biosynthesis and that impaired 2-CPs expression has a strong influence on cellular redox homeostasis in response to heat stress.

2-CPs influence the heat-induced oxidation of soluble proteins and accumulation of insoluble proteins

The time-course accumulation of heat-induced oxidized and insoluble proteins was measured in the leaves of the pTRV, pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants (Fig. 5A). The percentage of insoluble protein relative to total proteins in the pTRV control plants did not increase until after 7h of heat stress treatment. In contrast, the ratio of insoluble to total proteins increased in the pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, and pTRV-2-CP1/2 leaves throughout the duration of exposure to heat stress. Moreover, the levels of oxidized protein were higher in the leaves of the gene-silenced plants relative to the pTRV controls in the absence of stress and following heat treatment (Fig. 5B). These findings suggest that 2-CPs fulfil important roles in the protection against protein oxidation and accumulation of insoluble proteins.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Enhanced oxidation of soluble proteins and increased accumulation of insoluble proteins in partially 2-CPs-silenced plants under heat stress. (A) Time-course accumulation of insoluble proteins. Leaf tissues from VIGS plants were collected after the indicated time (h) at 45°C for the preparation of total, soluble, and insoluble proteins, as described in “Materials and Methods”. The percentages of insoluble proteins to total proteins were calculated by the determination of total proteins in the starting homogenates and insoluble proteins in the final pellets. The data are the means of four replicates with SDs. (B) Oxidation of soluble proteins. Coomassie Blue-stained gel of samples (lower panel) from part of the upper panel to demonstrate equal loading. Molecular size markers are indicated at the left. Leaf samples were collected after 7h of heat stress, and soluble proteins were isolated and derivatized by 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP), followed by immunoblotting using an anti-DNP antibody.

Silencing of 2-CPs promoted stress-induced autophagy under heat stress

Autophagy is required for the degradation of oxidized proteins formed during natural and stress-induced senescence stress conditions. We therefore examined the expression patterns of the nine autophagy genes (ATG3, ATG5, ATG6, ATG7, ATG 8a, ATG8f, ATG8h, ATG9, and ATG10) in response to heat stress in the pTRV controls and the pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants. While the levels of these transcripts were not greatly changed in the 2-CP1-, 2-CP2-, and 2-CP1/2-silenced plants compared to the pTRV plants in the absence of stress, the levels of ATG3, ATG5, ATG6, ATG8a, and ATG8h were significantly higher in the pTRV-2-CP2 and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants than in the controls (Fig. 6). The accumulation of ATG8a, ATG8f, and ATG8h transcripts was increased after 1h of heat stress treatment in the pTRV controls, while others were significantly increased after 7h of heat stress (Fig. 6). The heat-induced accumulation of ATG5, ATG6, ATG7, and ATG8h transcripts occurred earlier in the pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants than in the controls (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Induction of autophagy genes by heat stress in 2-CPs-silenced plants. VIGS plants were placed at 45°C in growth chambers, and total RNA was isolated from leaf samples collected at the indicated times. The data are the means of four replicates with SDs. Different letters indicate significant differences between the treatments according to Tukey’s test (P < 0.05).

Autophagosome formation was determined in tomato leaves from plants that had been exposed to 45°C for 1h. In the absence of stress, very few autophagosome structures were observed in the leaves of the pTRV controls or the pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants (Fig. 7). Exposure to heat stress resulted in an increase in the presence of autophagosomes in all plants. The silencing of 2-CP1, 2-CP2, and 2-CP1/2 led to a greater accumulation of heat-induced autophagosomes than was observed in the pTRV controls (Fig. 7). Heat stress therefore led to expression of the ATG genes in tomato leaves and to the formation of autophagosomes. These processes were observed earlier in the response to heat stress in pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants than in the controls (Figs 6 & 7). Meanwhile, we found less accumulation of starch in the chloroplasts of pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, and pTRV-2-CP1/2 leaves than in the controls (Fig.7B).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Detection of autophagosome structures. (A) MDC-stained autophagosomes in tomato leaves. The leaves were visualized by fluorescence confocal microscopy to allow the detection of autophagosome structures or chlorophyll-derived red fluorescence. The green channel images of MDC-derived fluorescence are superimposed with the red autofluorescence of chloroplasts. Bars = 25 µm. (B) Formation of autophagosomes in tomato leaves under heat stress using TEM. Cp, chloroplast; S, starch grain; V, vacuole; blue arrows, autophagosomes. Bars = 1 µm. (C) Numbers of punctate MDC fluorescence spots per 20 000 μm2 section are indicated. Means and SD were calculated from three experiments. (D) Numbers of autophagic structures in the mesophyll cells. Means and SD were calculated from four experiments, and each replicate was the average number of 100 mesophyll cells. Different letters indicate significant differences between the treatments according to Tukey’s test (P < 0.05). Leaf samples were taken at 1h after the heat stress.

Silencing of ATG5 and ATG7 impaired the heat tolerance and induced accumulation of 2-CPs

To explore the relationship between 2-CPs and autophagy further in relation to heat tolerance of tomato, ATG5 and ATG7 were silenced using the VIGS method. The pTRV-ATG5 and pTRV-ATG7 plants generated in this way showed an increased sensitivity to heat stress (Fig. 8A, B) as determined by the heat-stress induced decreases in Fv/Fm ratios. In addition, the heat-induced increases in the accumulation of 2-CP1, 2-CP2, and 2-CPs proteins were higher in the pTRV-ATG5 and pTRV-ATG7 plants than in the pTRV controls (Fig. 8CF). Western blot analysis revealed that there was a more significant increase in the accumulation of dimer 2-CPs in pTRV-ATG5 and, especially, pTRV-ATG7 plants relative to the pTRV controls after exposure to heat stress. As a result, a larger decrease in the 2-CPs monomer to dimer ratio was found in response to heat stress in pTRV-ATG5 and pTRV-ATG7 plants than in the pTRV controls (Fig. 8F).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

ATG5 and ATG7 silencing induced changes in heat tolerance, transcript levels of 2-CP1 and 2-CP2, and 2-CP accumulation in tomato plants. (A) Images of Fv/Fm in response to heat stress. (B) Average Fv/Fm values in response to heat stress. (C, D) The expression of 2-CPs in response to heat stress. (E, F) The protein abundance of 2-CPs in response to heat stress. VIGS plants were placed at 22°C and 45°C in growth chambers for 7h and immediately measured for Fv/Fm. Leaf samples were collected at 0, 2.5, and 5h after heat stress for 2-CPs protein abundance analysis. The data are the means of four replicates with SDs. Different letters indicate significant differences between the treatments according to Tukey’s test (P < 0.05).

Discussion

Although the functions of the chloroplast 2-CPs have been intensively studied (Baier and Dietz, 1999; Broin et al., 2002; Awad et al., 2015), the precise roles of these redox proteins in heat stress responses have not been fully characterized, particularly in relation to the regulation of autophagy and other antioxidants. Using a similar VIGS approach in Nicotiana benthamiana, a recent study showed that the loss of 2-Cys peroxiredoxin family and type-II peroxiredoxin B proteins impaired the heat stress response through effects on AsA regeneration, the xanthophyll cycle, and downstream abscisic acid signalling (Vidigal et al., 2015). The relationships between the 2-CPs and the ascorbate-mediated detoxification systems are particularly interesting because the chloroplast-localized 2-CPs and the tAPX have overlapping functions in H2O2 removal (Awad et al., 2015). Moreover, while it is established that these antioxidant systems act synergistically to protect the photosynthetic apparatus against the negative effects of excess light (Awad et al., 2015), relatively little is known about the co-operation and redundancy between these systems and autophagy in other abiotic stress responses. The data presented in this manuscript allow us to draw a number of conclusions, discussed below.

2-CPs are required for heat stress tolerance in tomato

Heat stress induced the expression of 2-CP1 and 2-CP2 and led to 2-CP protein accumulation in tomato. Interestingly, silencing 2-CP1 and 2-CP2 did not induce photoinhibition in the absence of the heat stress as observed in 2cpa and 2cpb mutants of Arabidopsis (Awad et al., 2015). However, silencing of 2-CP1 and 2-CP2 resulted in an increased sensitivity to heat stress (Figs 1A, B and 2), confirming the role of these redox proteins in the heat stress response. The data presented here demonstrate that 2-CPs are required in an appropriate response to heat stress, as they are in plant responses to other environmental stresses (Horling et al., 2002; Kim et al., 2009). The abundance of 2-CP transcripts is increased by cold, salt, and oxidative (H2O2) stresses, as well as wounding in A. thaliana, Vigna radiata (mung bean), and Oryza sativa (rice) (Horling et al., 2003; Cho et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2013). In addition, the expression of 2-CP genes is regulated by ascorbate (Horling et al., 2003). Here we show that exposure to heat stress led to a significant increase in 2-CP1 and 2-CP2 transcripts within an hour of the imposition of the stress and this was followed by an increase in 2-CP protein accumulation (Fig. 1). A previous study showed that peroxide reduction by 2-CP in tomato chloroplasts was dependent on thioredoxins, especially TRX-x, TRX-m1/4, and TRX-m2 (Cheng et al., 2014). The subsequent decline in 2-CP1 and 2-CP2 transcripts after 5h of heat stress treatment (Fig. 1A, B) was accompanied by a decrease in the 2-CP monomer to dimer ratios in the tomato leaves (Fig. 1C). Taken together, these findings suggest that either the biosynthesis of 2-CPs or the regeneration of the reduced forms could not keep pace with chloroplast H2O2 production under heat stress.

The pTRV-2-CP2 plants were more sensitive to heat stress than the pTRV-2-CP1 plants (Figs 2B, 3, and 5A). Thus, even though 2-CP1 and 2-CP2 are 86% identical at the amino acid level, these proteins appear to play somewhat different roles in the heat stress response. Moreover, the higher insoluble to total protein ratios and lower AsA to DHA ratios observed in the pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants compared to either the pTRV-2-CP1 or pTRV-2-CP2 plants suggests synergistic effects between 2-CP1 and 2-CP2 in the heat stress response (Figs 4B and 5A).

Heat stress tolerance requires an interaction between 2-CP and the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in tomato

H2O2 is produced at high rates by photosynthesis, particularly under stress conditions (Noctor et al., 2002). In the chloroplasts, 2-CPs act together with the ascorbate-glutathione cycle to remove H2O2 and protect the photosystems from photo-oxidative stress (Asada et al., 1998; Foyer and Shigeoka, 2011; Awad et al., 2015). Exposure to heat stress increased the abundance of transcripts encoding enzymes of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle and superoxide dismutase, as well as the activities of these enzymes in the pTRV control plants, as has been reported previously in tomato (Nie et al., 2013). The data presented here provide further evidence of the interdependent functions of these antioxidant systems in the stress responses in tomato plants. These findings confirm the involvement of SOD and the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in the heat response in tomato plants.

Like other antioxidants, 2-CPs also fulfil signalling functions associated with H2O2 metabolism in chloroplasts (Dietz et al., 2006). The levels of Cu/Zn-SOD, sAPX, tAPX, and MDAR transcripts were higher in the pTRV-2-CP1/2 tomato plants in the absence of stress (Fig. 3A), in which the activities of SOD, APX, and MDAR were also increased relative to pTRV controls (Fig. 3B). These findings agree with earlier observations showing that the suppression of 2-CP functions in Arabidopsis resulted in an oxidation of the ascorbate pool, and led to increased expression and activities of sAPX, tAPX, and MDAR in the absence of stress (Baier et al., 2000). Taken together, these results demonstrate the coordinated compensatory functions of the 2-CP and ascorbate-glutathione systems in water-water cycle activities. Moreover, the heat-induced increases in ascorbate-glutathione cycle-related transcripts and enzyme activities were largely compromised in the 2-CP-silenced plants, resulting in substantial decreases in the AsA to DHA and the GSH to GSSG ratios (Figs 3 and 4A, B). All these results suggest that 2-CP-mediated oxidative signalling is required for the expression of the SOD and ascorbate-glutathione cycle-related genes in tomato. The data presented here also revealed the function similarity of 2-CPs in tomato and in Arabidopsis in response to heat and other stresses (Baier et al., 2000; Foyer and Shigeoka, 2011; Awad et al., 2015).

The pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants showed a higher accumulation of leaf ascorbate than did the pTRV controls in the absence of stress (Fig. 4B). This finding is consistent with previous observations showing that loss of 2-CP function results in the expression of genes involved in ascorbate biosynthesis in Arabidopsis in the absence of stress (Baier et al., 2000). The loss of 2-CP functions would place an additional burden on the ascorbate-glutathione pathways of H2O2 detoxification, leading to the observed decreases in the AsA to DHA and the GSH to GSSG ratios relative to the pTRV controls, as discussed previously (Dietz et al., 2002). However, this compensatory action does not explain why the heat-stress-dependent induction of the expression of ascorbate biosynthesis genes was compromised in the pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants (Fig. 4B, C). One possibility suggested by these findings is that the 2-CP-dependent oxidative signalling pathway is required for the regulated expression of ascorbate biosynthesis genes.

2-CPs are required for the oxidative regulation of autophagy in the heat stress response in tomato

The data presented here show that the activities of 2-CPs attenuate protein misfolding and denaturation under heat stress. Loss of 2-CP1, 2-CP2, or 2-CP1/2 functions resulted in increased levels of oxidized soluble proteins that may aggregate into high molecular weight insoluble proteins (Fig. 5B). The lower levels of heat tolerance exhibited by the pTRV-2-CP1, pTRV-2-CP2, and pTRV-2-CP1/2 plants were also associated with an increased accumulation of insoluble protein (Fig. 5A).

The efficient removal of misfolded and denatured proteins is required to prevent the cells from proteotoxic stress (Hightower, 1991). This can be achieved by autophagy, which is a major process involved in the dismantling of cellular structures during natural and stress-induced senescence (Slavikova et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2009; Liu and Bassham, 2010; Zhou et al., 2013). Heat tolerance was suppressed in the ATG5- and ATG7-silenced tomato plants, which is in agreement with a previous study (Zhou et al., 2014). The data presented here confirm that autophagy plays an important role in heat tolerance in tomato. The levels of 2-CP1 and 2-CP2 transcript and 2-CP protein were significantly higher in the ATG5- and ATG7-silenced plants that had been exposed to heat stress (Fig. 8CF). These findings suggest that 2-CP functions are important in the regulation of autophagy, a finding that might be related to the transmission of ROS signals, which are known to induce autophagy in plants exposed to environmental stresses (Liu and Bassham, 2010). In these studies, the observed changes in ATG transcripts occurred in parallel to increases in the ratios of insoluble to total protein (Figs. 5A and 6). The levels of ATG5 and ATG7 transcripts increased more rapidly in the plants that were defective in 2-CP functions. Additionally, the 2-CP-silenced plants had greater numbers of autophagosomes in line with the increased accumulation of oxidized proteins and production of insoluble protein (Figs 57). On the other hand, the ATG5- and ATG7-silenced plants had increased transcript levels and accumulation of 2-CPs in response to the heat stress (Figs. 8CF), suggesting that 2-CPs and autophagy could function co-ordinately to prevent the cells from heat-induced oxidative damage in tomato. It is also worth noting that induction of autophagy was associated with less accumulation of starch in the chloroplasts of heat-treated 2-CP-silenced plants, suggesting a potential role of 2-CPs in starch metabolism. This is in agreement with an earlier finding that autophagy induces rapid starch degradation in Arabidopsis (Wang and Liu, 2013)

In summary, the results of this study provide new links between the interactive 2-CPs and ascorbate-glutathione ROS-processing systems of chloroplasts. Evidence is provided to support the concept that both pathways function together in ROS detoxification during heat stress in tomato. Moreover, the data suggest that 2-CPs may also fulfil a signalling role linked to oxidant processing, the induction of autophagy, and the removal of oxidized proteins during heat stress.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Fig. S1. Relative mRNA abundance of 2-CP1, 2-CP2, ATG5, and ATG7, and phenotypes in VIGS plants.

Fig. S2. Phylogenetic tree of 2-Cys peroxiredoxins from Solanum lycopersicum.

Fig. S3. Relative mRNA abundance of CAT2 and activity of CAT in 2-CP-silenced plants after a heat stress.

Fig. S4. Changes in GSH, GSSG, AsA, and DHA content in 2-CP-silenced plants after heat stress.

Table S1. PCR primers designed for vector construction.

Table S2. Gene-specific primers designed for qRT-PCR.

Supplementary Data

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms CM Meng for excellent technical help with confocal microscopy. We are also grateful to Dr J Hong for kind advice regarding transmission electron microscopy observation. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31430076, 31372109) and the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest of China (201203004). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Asada K. 1999. The water-water cycle in chloroplasts: scavenging of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons. Annual Review of Plant Biology 50, 601–639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asada K, Endo T, Mano J, Miyake C.1998. Molecular mechanism for relaxation of and protection from light stress. In: Satoh K, Murata N, eds. Stress responses of photosynthetic organisms: molecular mechanisms and molecular regulations . Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV, 37–52. [Google Scholar]
  3. Awad J, Stotz HU, Fekete A, Krischke M, Engert C, Havaux M, Berger S, Mueller MJ. 2015. 2-cysteine peroxiredoxins peroxiredoxins and thylakoid ascorbate peroxidase create a water-water cycle that is essential to protect the photosynthetic apparatus under high light stress conditions. Plant Physiology 167, 1592–603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baier M, Dietz KJ. 1999. Protective function of chloroplast 2-cysteine peroxiredoxin in photosynthesis. Evidence from transgenic Arabidopsis . Plant Physiology 119, 1407–1414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baier M, Noctor G, Foyer CH, Dietz KJ. 2000. Antisense suppression of 2-cysteine peroxiredoxin in Arabidopsis specifically enhances the activities and expression of enzymes associated with ascorbate metabolism but not glutathione metabolism. Plant Physiology 124, 823–832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Broin M, Cuiné S, Eymery F, Rey P. 2002. The plastidic 2-cysteine peroxiredoxin is a target for a thioredoxin involved in the protection of the photosynthetic apparatus against oxidative damage. The Plant Cell 14, 1417–1432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen CNN, Chen HR, Yeh SY, Vittore G, Ho THD. 2009. Autophagy is enhanced and floral development is impaired in AtHVA22d RNA interference Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 149, 1679–1689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng F, Zhou YH, Xia XJ, Shi K, Zhou J, Yu JQ. 2014. Chloroplastic thioredoxin-f and thioredoxin-m1/4 play important roles in brassinosteroids-induced changes in CO2 assimilation and cellular redox homeostasis in tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 4335–4347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cho CW, Chung E, Heo JE, So HA, Choi HK, Kim DH, Chung YS, Chae HZ, Lee JH. 2012. Molecular characterization of a 2-Cys peroxiredoxin induced by abiotic stress in mungbean. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 108, 473–484. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dietz KJ, Horling F, König J, Baier M. 2002. The function of the chloroplast 2-cysteine peroxiredoxin in peroxide detoxification and its regulation. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 1321–1329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dietz KJ, Jacob S, Oelze ML, Laxa M, Tognetti V, de Miranda SMN, Baier M, Finkemeier I. 2006. The function of peroxiredoxins in plant organelle redox metabolism. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 1697–1709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ekengren SK, Liu Y, Schiff M, Dinesh-Kumar S, Martin GB. 2003. Two MAPK cascades, NPR1, and TGA transcription factors play a role in Pto-mediated disease resistance in tomato. The Plant Journal 36, 905–917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Foyer CH, Halliwell B. 1976. The presence of glutathione and glutathione reductase in chloroplasts: a proposed role in ascorbic acid metabolism. Planta 133, 21–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Foyer CH, Noctor G. 2005. Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: a metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. The Plant Cell 17, 1866–1875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Foyer CH, Shigeoka S. 2011. Understanding oxidative stress and antioxidant functions to enhance photosynthesis. Plant Physiology 155, 93–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Giacomelli L, Masi A, Ripoll DR, Lee MJ, van Wijk KJ. 2007. Arabidopsis thaliana deficient in two chloroplast ascorbate peroxidases shows accelerated light-induced necrosis when levels of cellular ascorbate are low. Plant Molecular Biology 65, 627–644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gill SS, Tuteja N. 2010. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 48, 909–930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hightower LE. 1991. Heat shock, stress proteins, chaperones, and proteotoxicity. Cell 66, 191–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hong SW, Lee U, Vierling E. 2003. Arabidopsis hot mutants define multiple functions required for acclimation to high temperatures. Plant Physiology 132, 757–767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Horling F, König J, Dietz KJ. 2002. Type II peroxiredoxin C, a member of the peroxiredoxin family of Arabidopsis thaliana: its expression and activity in comparison with other peroxiredoxins. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 40, 491–499. [Google Scholar]
  21. Horling F, Lamkemeyer P, König J, Finkemeier I, Kandlbinder A, Baier M, Dietz KJ. 2003. Divergent light-, ascorbate-, and oxidative stress-dependent regulation of expression of the peroxiredoxin gene family in Arabidopsis . Plant Physiology 131, 317–325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jiang YP, Huang LF, Cheng F, Zhou YH, Xia XJ, Mao WH, Shi K, Yu JQ. 2013. Brassinosteroids accelerate recovery of photosynthetic apparatus from cold stress by balancing the electron partitioning, carboxylation and redox homeostasis in cucumber. Physiologia Plantarum 148, 133–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kangasjarvi S, Lepisto A, Hannikainen K, Piippo M, Luomala EM, Aro EM, Rintamaki E. 2008. Diverse roles for chloroplast stromal and thylakoid-bound ascorbate peroxidases in plant stress responses. Biochemical Journal 412, 275–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim IS, Kim YS, Yoon HS. 2013. Expression of salt-induced 2-Cys peroxiredoxin from Oryza sativa increases stress tolerance and fermentation capacity in genetically engineered yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 97, 3519–3533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim SY, Jang HH, Lee JR, Sung NR, Lee HB, Lee DH, Park DJ, Kang CH, Chung WS, Lim CO, Yun DJ, Kim WY, Lee KO, Lee SY. 2009. Oligomerization and chaperone activity of a plant 2-Cys peroxiredoxin in response to oxidative stress. Plant Science 177, 227–232. [Google Scholar]
  26. Klionsky DJ. 2005. The molecular machinery of autophagy: unanswered questions. Journal of Cell Science 118, 7–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lai Z, Wang F, Zheng Z, Fan B, Chen Z. 2011. A critical role of autophagy in plant resistance to necrotrophic fungal pathogens. The Plant Journal 66, 953–968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lenz HD, Haller E, Melzer E, Kober K, Wurster K, Stahl M, Bassham DC, Vierstra RD, Parker JE, Bautor J. 2011. Autophagy differentially controls plant basal immunity to biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. The Plant Journal 66, 818–830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu Y, Bassham DC. 2010. TOR is a negative regulator of autophagy in Arabidopsis thaliana . PLoS One 5, e11883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu Y, Xiong Y, Bassham DC. 2009. Autophagy is required for tolerance of drought and salt stress in plants. Autophagy 5, 954–963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-△△CT method. Methods 25, 402–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Maruta T, Tanouchi A, Tamoi M, Yabuta Y, Yoshimura K, Ishikawa T, Shigeoka S. 2010. Arabidopsis chloroplastic ascorbate peroxidase isoenzymes play a dual role in photoprotection and gene regulation under photooxidative stress. Plant and Cell Physiology 51, 190–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Muthuramalingam M, Dietz KJ, Ströher E. 2010. Thiol-disulfide redox proteomics in plant research. Methods in Molecular Biology 639, 219–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nie WF, Wang MM, Xia XJ, Zhou YH, Shi K, Chen Z, Yu JQ. 2013. Silencing of tomato RBOH1 and MPK2 abolishes brassinosteroid-induced H2O2 generation and stress tolerance. Plant, Cell & Environment 36, 789–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Noctor G, Foyer CH. 1998. Ascorbate and glutathione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annual Review Plant Physiology Plant Molecular Biology 49, 249–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Noctor G, Foyer CH. 2005. Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: a metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. The Plant Cell 17, 1866–1875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Noctor G, Veljovic-Jovanovic S, Driscoll S, Novitskaya L, Foyer CH. 2002. Drought and oxidative load in wheat leaves: a predominant role for photorespiration? Annals of Botany 89, 841–850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Perez-Perez ME, Lemaire SD, Crespo JL. 2012. Reactive oxygen species and autophagy in plants and algae. Plant Physiology 160, 156–164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Petersson UA, Kieselbach T, García-Cerdán JG, Schröder WP. 2006. The Prx Q protein of Arabidopsis thaliana is a member of the luminal chloroplast proteome. FEBS Letters 580, 6055–6061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pulido P, Cazalis R, Cejudo FJ. 2009. An antioxidant redox system in the nucleus of wheat seed cells suffering oxidative stress. The Plant Journal 57, 132–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rouhier N, Jacquot JP. 2002. Plant peroxiredoxins: alternative hydroperoxide scavenging enzymes. Photosynthesis Research 74, 259–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Slavikova S, Ufaz S, Avin-Wittenberg T, Levanony H, Galili G. 2008. An autophagy-associated Atg8 protein is involved in the responses of Arabidopsis seedlings to hormonal controls and abiotic stresses. Journal of Experimental Botany 59, 4029–4043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. The Tomato Genome Consortium 2012. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485, 635–641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tripathi BN, Bhatt I, Dietz KJ. 2009. Peroxiredoxins: a less studied component of hydrogen peroxide detoxification in photosynthetic organisms. Protoplasma 235, 3–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Vidigal P, Martin-Hernandez AM, Guiu-Aragonés C, Amâncio S, Carvalho L. 2015. Selective silencing of 2Cys and type-IIB Peroxiredoxins discloses their roles in cell redox state and stress signaling. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 57, 591–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang Y, Liu YL. 2013. Autophagic degradation of leaf starch in plants. Autophagy 9, 1247–1248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang Y, Yu B, Zhao J, Guo J, Li Y, Han S, Huang L, Du Y, Hong Y, Tang D, Liu YL. 2013. Autophagy contributes to leaf starch degradation. The Plant Cell 25, 1383–1399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Xia XJ, Wang YJ, Zhou YH, Tao Y, Mao WH, Shi K, Asami T, Chen Z, Yu JQ. 2009. Reactive oxygen species are involved in brassinosteroid-induced stress tolerance in cucumber. Plant Physiology 150, 801–814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Xiong Y, Contento AL, Bassham DC. 2007a. Disruption of autophagy results in constitutive oxidative stress in Arabidopsis. Autophagy 3, 257–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Xiong Y, Contento AL, Nguyen PQ, Bassham DC. 2007b. Degradation of oxidized proteins by autophagy during oxidative stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 143, 291–299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhou J, Wang J, Cheng Y, Chi YJ, Fan B, Yu JQ, Chen Z. 2013. NBR1-mediated selective autophagy targets insoluble ubiquitinated protein aggregates in plant stress responses. PLoS Genetics 9, e1003196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhou J, Wang J, Yu JQ, Chen Z. 2014. Role and regulation of autophagy in heat stress responses of tomato plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 5, 174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES