Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1993 Nov 15;90(22):10663–10667. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10663

Genetic and linguistic differentiation in the Americas.

R H Ward 1, A Redd 1, D Valencia 1, B Frazier 1, S Pääbo 1
PMCID: PMC47837  PMID: 8248157

Abstract

The relationship between linguistic differentiation and evolutionary affinities was evaluated in three tribes of the Pacific Northwest. Two tribes (Nuu-Chah-Nulth and Bella Coola) speak Amerind languages, while the language of the third (Haida) belongs to a different linguistic phylum--Na-Dene. Construction of a molecular phylogeny gave no evidence of clustering by linguistic affiliation, suggesting a relatively recent ancestry of these linguistically divergent populations. When the evolutionary affinities of the tribes were evaluated in terms of mitochondrial sequence diversity, the Na-Dene-speaking Haida had a reduced amount of diversity compared to the two Amerind tribes and thus appear to be a biologically younger population. Further, since the sequence diversity between the two Amerind-speaking tribes is comparable to the diversity between the Amerind tribes and the Na-Dene Haida, the evolutionary divergence within the Amerind linguistic phylum may be as great as the evolutionary divergence between the Amerind and Na-Dene phyla. Hence, in the New World, rates of linguistic differentiation appear to be markedly faster than rates of biological differentiation, with little congruence between linguistic hierarchy and the pattern of evolutionary relationships.

Full text

PDF
10663

Images in this article

10666Fig. 4
on p.10666

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson S., Bankier A. T., Barrell B. G., de Bruijn M. H., Coulson A. R., Drouin J., Eperon I. C., Nierlich D. P., Roe B. A., Sanger F. Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome. Nature. 1981 Apr 9;290(5806):457–465. doi: 10.1038/290457a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbujani G., Sokal R. R. Zones of sharp genetic change in Europe are also linguistic boundaries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Mar;87(5):1816–1819. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.5.1816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrantes R., Smouse P. E., Mohrenweiser H. W., Gershowitz H., Azofeifa J., Arias T. D., Neel J. V. Microevolution in lower Central America: genetic characterization of the Chibcha-speaking groups of Costa Rica and Panama, and a consensus taxonomy based on genetic and linguistic affinity. Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Jan;46(1):63–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Minch E., Mountain J. L. Coevolution of genes and languages revisited. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jun 15;89(12):5620–5624. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Piazza A., Menozzi P., Mountain J. Reconstruction of human evolution: bringing together genetic, archaeological, and linguistic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(16):6002–6006. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.16.6002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Wilson A. C., Cantor C. R., Cook-Deegan R. M., King M. C. Call for a worldwide survey of human genetic diversity: a vanishing opportunity for the Human Genome Project. Genomics. 1991 Oct;11(2):490–491. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(91)90169-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chakraborty R. Cultural, language and geographical correlates of genetic variability in Andean highland Indians. Nature. 1976 Nov 25;264(5584):350–352. doi: 10.1038/264350a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chakraborty R., Smouse P. E., Neel J. V. Population amalgamation and genetic variation: observations on artificially agglomerated tribal populations of Central and South America. Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Nov;43(5):709–725. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chakraborty R., Weiss K. M. Genetic variation of the mitochondrial DNA genome in American Indians is at mutation-drift equilibrium. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1991 Dec;86(4):497–506. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330860405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ewens W. J. The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theor Popul Biol. 1972 Mar;3(1):87–112. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(72)90035-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lundstrom R., Tavaré S., Ward R. H. Estimating substitution rates from molecular data using the coalescent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jul 1;89(13):5961–5965. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.13.5961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Torroni A., Schurr T. G., Yang C. C., Szathmary E. J., Williams R. C., Schanfield M. S., Troup G. A., Knowler W. C., Lawrence D. N., Weiss K. M. Native American mitochondrial DNA analysis indicates that the Amerind and the Nadene populations were founded by two independent migrations. Genetics. 1992 Jan;130(1):153–162. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.1.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ward R. H., Frazier B. L., Dew-Jager K., Päbo S. Extensive mitochondrial diversity within a single Amerindian tribe. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Oct 1;88(19):8720–8724. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.19.8720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES