Abstract
Low maternal circulating concentrations of placental growth factor (PlGF) are one of the hallmarks of human pregnancy complications, including fetal growth restriction (FGR) and early‐onset pre‐eclampsia (PE). Currently, PlGF is used clinically with other biomarkers to screen for high‐risk cases, although the mechanisms underlying its regulation are largely unknown. Placental endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress has recently been found to be elevated in cases of FGR, and to an even greater extent in early‐onset PE complicated with FGR. ER stress activates the unfolded protein response (UPR); attenuation of protein translation and a reduction in cell growth and proliferation play crucial roles in the pathophysiology of these complications of pregnancy. In this study, we further identified that ER stress regulates release of PlGF. We first observed that down‐regulation of PlGF protein was associated with nuclear localization of ATF4, ATF6α and ATF6β in the syncytiotrophoblast of placentae from PE patients. Transcript analysis showed a decrease of PlGF mRNA, and an increase from genes encoding those UPR transcription factors in placentae from cases of early‐onset PE, but not of late‐onset (>34 weeks) PE, compared to term controls. Further investigations indicated a strong correlation between ATF4 and PlGF mRNA levels only (r = − 0.73, p < 0.05). These results could be recapitulated in trophoblast‐like cells exposed to chemical inducers of ER stress or hypoxia–reoxygenation. The stability of PlGF transcripts was unchanged. The use of small interfering RNA specific for transcription factors in the UPR pathways revealed that ATF4 and ATF6β, but not ATF6α, modulate PlGF transcription. To conclude, ATF4 and ATF6β act synergistically in the negative regulation of PlGF mRNA expression, resulting in reduced PlGF secretion by the trophoblast in response to stress. Therefore, these results further support the targeting of placental ER stress as a potential new therapeutic intervention for these pregnancy complications. © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Keywords: placental growth factor, pre‐eclampsia, endoplasmic reticulum stress, placenta, pregnancy and reproduction
Introduction
Pre‐eclampsia and fetal growth restriction (FGR) are two major causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity 1. Many potential causes have been proposed, although the pathological mechanisms underlying these disorders are still not fully understood. Hence, effective treatments remain elusive 2, 3. Pre‐eclampsia is a multi‐system, heterogeneous syndrome and increasingly two forms are recognized, early‐ and late‐onset 4, 5. Roberts and Redman stated in 1993 that PE 'starts with the placenta and ends with the endothelium' 6. This hypothesis has been developed further 7, but remains the mainstay of current understanding of the pathophysiology. The early‐onset form is commonly associated with growth restriction and severe placental pathology. A failure in spiral artery remodelling is thought to lead to poor uteroplacental perfusion and intermittent placental hypoxia. Consequently, the placenta suffers oxidative stress, causing the release of factors that have systemic actions on various maternal organs. By contrast, spiral arterial and placental pathology are minimal in late‐onset pre‐eclampsia. It is thought that in these cases the mother carries a genetic predisposition to cardiovascular disease that renders her endothelium hypersensitive to factors released from a relatively normal placenta. Since maternal endothelial cell activation appears to be the common end‐point that unifies various features of the syndrome, attention has focused on an imbalance between angiogenic and anti‐angiogenic factors in the maternal circulation as one of the underlying mechanisms 2, 8.
The pro‐angiogenic factor, placental growth factor (PlGF), is a homodimeric glycoprotein with significant homology to vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF‐A), which was originally identified in the human placenta 9. It is an important regulator of angiogenesis and vasculogenesis 10 and four variants, −1, −2, −3 and −4, have been identified so far. All are primarily expressed in the placenta, predominately localized to the syncytiotrophoblast and endothelial cells 11, 12, 13, 14, 15. PlGF‐1 and PlGF‐3 are secreted forms, whereas PlGF‐2 and PlGF‐4 are membrane‐bound because of their heparin‐binding domains. PlGF binds to VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR1), also known as Flt‐1, thereby initiating kinase mediated signalling 16.
In cases of FGR and pre‐eclampsia, maternal circulating PlGF concentrations are reduced 17, 18, particularly in early‐onset pre‐eclampsia. Levels of other factors in the angiogenic balance are also altered. Anti‐angiogenic factors, including the soluble Fms‐like tyrosine kinase‐1 receptor (sFlt‐1) that binds VEGF‐A and soluble endoglin (sEng), are increased in maternal blood before the onset of pre‐eclampsia 18, 19. Changes in placental release are thought to underlie these alterations, as immunostaining for sFlt‐1 is increased, and for PlGF decreased, in pre‐eclamptic placentae compared to normal controls 20. Similarly, sFlt‐1 is increased and PlGF decreased in cultured trophoblast cells or placental villous explants exposed to oxidative stress 21. The pro‐angiogenic factors VEGF‐A and PlGF promote the survival and proliferation of endothelial cells and induce vascular permeability 22, 23. The binding of sFlt1 to free VEGF‐A and PlGF in the circulation reduces their availability and can act as a dominant‐negative receptor, thereby causing endothelial cell dysfunction, leading to hypertension, proteinuria and the other maternal systemic symptoms of pre‐eclampsia 24, 25. As a result, measurement of maternal circulating PlGF early in pregnancy has been used clinically to screen for both early‐onset pre‐eclampsia and FGR 17.
The level of PlGF transcripts is regulated by transcription factors, including metal responsive transcription factor 1 (MTF‐1), nuclear factor‐κB (NF‐κB) 26, 27, 28, as well as microRNA‐125b in hepatocellular cancer 29. In addition, in placental tissues the transcription factor glial cell missing 1 (GCM1) and the protein kinase A (PKA) signalling pathway up‐regulate its expression 28. The latter acts through cAMP‐responsive element binding proteins (CREBs) 30. However, the molecular mechanisms leading to down‐regulation of PlGF in the pathogenesis of pre‐eclampsia and FGR remain elusive.
Placental endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress has recently been recognized as playing a central role in the pathophysiology of early‐onset pre‐eclampsia and FGR, but not in late‐onset pre‐eclampsia 31, 32. The ER is the major organelle for the biosynthesis of polypeptide hormones, growth factors and plasma membrane proteins, and initiates their folding and post‐translational modifications. Overloading of the ER with nascent proteins, or perturbation of its ionic homeostasis through a variety of pathological stimuli, can lead to an imbalance between the protein load and the capacity of the folding machinery. As a result, unfolded or misfolded proteins accumulate in the lumen, a condition known as ER stress 36. This leads to activation of signalling pathways, collectively known as the unfolded protein response (UPR). Initially, the UPR aims to restore normal ER function but, if the attempt fails, apoptotic cascades are activated to eliminate damaged cells. The UPR comprises three highly conserved signalling pathways, including PERK–eIF2α–ATF4, which attenuates non‐essential protein synthesis and increases antioxidant defence systems; ATF6, which up‐regulates ER chaperones (GRP78 and GRP94) to increase folding capacity; and IRE1–XBP1, which increases phospholipid biosynthesis and promotes misfolded protein degradation 33. These pathways are activated sequentially in a severity‐dependent manner 31, 34.
In addition, activation of the transcription factors in the UPR pathways regulates expression of genes involved in a wide range of cellular functions, such as redox processes, amino acid metabolism and angiogenesis 35, 36, 37, 38, 39. In this study, we elucidated a novel mechanism by which ER stress potentially modulates maternal endothelial cell activation via down‐regulation of PlGF gene expression in early‐onset pre‐eclampsia.
Materials and methods
Study population and placental sample collection
All placental samples were obtained with local ethical permission and the patients' informed written consent. The detailed criteria for recruitment of patients for this study have been described previously 40. Briefly, the control group was from healthy normotensive term patients who displayed no abnormalities on routine scans, while the pre‐eclamptic group was from patients with new‐onset hypertension (≥140/90 mmHg) observed on at least two separate occasions, 6 h or more apart, combined with proteinuria (a 24 h urine sample showing ≥ 300 mg/24 h). Women with pre‐pregnancy diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus or pre‐existing renal disease were excluded. All placentae were obtained from elective, non‐laboured caesarean deliveries. For each placenta, four to six small pieces of tissue from separate lobules were rinsed three times in saline, blotted and snap‐frozen in liquid nitrogen within 10 min of delivery; the samples were stored at −80 °C. The clinical features of the pregnancies were described previously 32.
Cell culture
Human choriocarcinoma JEG‐3 and BeWo cells were cultured as described previously 34, 41.
Western blot analysis
Western blots were performed on both cell lysates and culture media to quantify relative total levels or phosphorylated levels of specific proteins. The details of antibodies and procedures are described in Supplementary materials and methods (see supporting information) and in a previous study 34.
In vitro hypoxia–reoxygenation experiments
For hypoxia–reoxygenation (H/R) challenge, cells were cultured in normal growth medium without serum in an incubator that allowed precise and variable control of oxygen (ExVivo, BioSpherix, Lacona, NY, USA) and the experiments were performed as described in a previous study 32.
Quantitative real‐time RT–PCR analysis
Total RNA was isolated using RNeasy Mini Kits (Qiagen, Manchester, UK), according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the quantitative PCR performed using SYBR Green JumpStart kits (Sigma, Dorset, UK). Details of the primer sequences (Table S1) and other procedures are described in Supplementary materials and methods (see supporting information). The PlGF primers detected three of the four isoforms of PlGF, including PlGF‐1, −2 and −3.
Small RNA interference
siRNA‐mediated knockdown of transcripts of interest in BeWo cells was performed using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX transfection reagent (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) for 48 h, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Details of siRNAs and the experimental procedures are described in Supplementary materials and methods (see supporting information)
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described 42. The details of antibodies and specific conditions for each antibody are described in Supplementary materials and methods (see supporting information).
Statistical analysis
Differences were tested using non‐parametric Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparison test. Correlations between PlGF mRNA and ATF4 or ATF6α or ATF6β mRNAs were tested using Pearson's correlation. Power regression lines were fitted to display relationships. For cell culture experiments, both the Mann–Whitney test and two‐tailed Student's t‐test were used as appropriate. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v. 6.0, with p ≤ 0.05 considered significant.
Results
Severity of ER stress is negatively correlated with PlGF transcript and protein levels in pathological placentae
Oxidative stress is a strong inducer of ER stress 34 and lowers PlGF in the placenta 21. We therefore investigated the potential role of ER stress in the regulation of PlGF synthesis. In the placenta, PlGF is predominately localized in the syncytiotrophoblast, and its level is reduced in placentae from cases of early‐onset pre‐eclampsia (Figure 1). We first examined activation of the three UPR pathways using immunohistochemistry. Interestingly, the activity of PERK (which is indicated by ATF4), ATF6 (which has two isoforms, α and β), and IRE1α were all increased, and located mainly in the syncytiotrophoblast and fetal endothelial cells (Figure 1). ATF4, ATF6α and ATFβ are transcription factors, and their activation promotes nuclear translocation. Indeed, increased ATF4 and ATF6α and ATFβ immunoreactivity was found mainly in the syncytiotrophoblastic nuclei, implicating them in transcriptional regulation in the pathological placentae.
We next investigated whether the low level of PlGF in placentae from pre‐eclamptic patients was regulated at the transcription level. Therefore, PlGF mRNA was measured in placentae from normotensive term controls (n = 7), early‐onset pre‐eclampsia (n = 10) and late‐onset pre‐eclampsia (n = 8). A significant reduction of PlGF mRNA was observed in placentae from early‐onset pre‐eclampsia, but not in those from late‐onset pre‐eclampsia, where levels were indistinguishable from the term controls (Figure 2A). Analysis of ATF4, ATF6α and ATF6β transcripts revealed that all three were similarly significantly elevated in placentae from early‐onset pre‐eclampsia, but not in those from the late‐onset cases (Figure 2A).
To test for any relationship between these ER stress‐mediated transcription factors and the PlGF mRNA level, correlations were plotted for PlGF mRNA against the transcript levels of ATF4, ATF6α and ATF6β. We observed a significant relationship (p < 0.001) between ATF4 and PlGF transcripts, with the correlation coefficient reaching −0.733 (R 2 = 0.537) (Figure 2B). By contrast, no significant relationship was observed for ATF6α and ATF6β mRNA (see supplementary material, Figure S1). This result strongly suggests a potential role of ER stress in the negative regulation of PlGF transcription mediated by ATF4. Therefore, cell culture models and ER stress inducers were used to investigate the potential mechanism further.
ER stress induces a severity‐dependent reduction in PlGF secretion and gene expression in trophoblast‐like cell lines
In order to eliminate cell type‐specific and drug‐specific effects, two human choriocarcinoma cell lines, JEG‐3 and BeWo, and two ER stress inducers, tunicamycin (Tm, an N‐linked glycosylation inhibitor) and thapsigargin (Tg, an inhibitor of sarco‐endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase), were used for studies in vitro. We have previously reported a dose–response effect of tunicamycin on the activation of ER stress pathways and apoptosis in JEG‐3 cells 31. Therefore, the results presented in Figure 3A are from BeWo cells. Doses of tunicamycin of up to 0.63 µg/ml cause minimal cell death (3.2%), whereas 1.25 µg/ml and 2.5 µg/ml cause 40% and 56%, respectively 34. We performed a similar dose–response study for thapsigargin, and found an equivalent effect in induction of apoptosis. Doses < 100 nm caused minimal cell death after 24 h, and so this was the maximum concentration used for subsequent experiments. Increasing concentrations of thapsigargin induced dose‐dependent activation of all three UPR pathways, while with tunicamycin the PERK‐eIF2α and IRE1α arms were clearly activated, but not the ATF6α pathway. However, ATF6α is a glycoprotein containing three N‐glycosylation sites at the C‐terminus, and under‐glycosylation has been shown to increase its transcriptional activity 43. In Figure 3A, a gradual reduction in ATF6α electrophoretic mobility was observed as the concentration of tunicamycin increased, indicating a loss of N‐glycosylation and thereby an elevation of its transcriptional activity. Both ATF6α(p50) and ATF6α(p90) undergo proteosomal‐mediated degradation upon activation 44, 45. This might explain why ATF6α protein was greatly reduced at the lethal dosage of tunicamycin (2.5 µg/ml).
In order to reveal the activity of these pathways in response to tunicamycin, the downstream effectors of the PERK–eIF2α, ATF6α and IRE1α pathways, viz. ATF4, GRP78 and XBP‐1, respectively, were examined. Under ER stress, phosphorylation of eIF2α mediates an increase in transcription and translation of ATF4 46; activation of ATF6α up‐regulates GRP78 gene expression 47, while the increased endoribonuclease activity of activated IRE1α facilitates XBP‐1 mRNA splicing 48. As can be seen in Figure 3B, there was a dose‐dependent increase of ATF4, GRP78 and splicing of XBP‐1 mRNA, confirming activation of all three UPR pathways in response to tunicamycin. Crucially, increasing severity of ER stress was closely associated with decreased secretion of PlGF by the cells (Figure 3C).
The reduced levels of PlGF mRNA measured in placentae from early‐onset pre‐eclampsia in Figure 2A suggest that the decrease in maternal blood concentrations PlGF seen in pre‐eclampsia are likely to result from the reduction of PlGF mRNA. We therefore examined PlGF transcripts under ER stress in both BeWo and JEG‐3 cells. Indeed, PlGF mRNA was reduced in an ER stress severity‐dependent manner in both cell types (Figure 3D), demonstrating a similar profile to the secreted PlGF (Figure 3C). Both transcription and RNA degradation contribute to the transcript level. PlGF mRNA stability was investigated using the global transcription inhibitor, actinomycin D (Act‐D). We treated cells in the presence or absence of tunicamycin and followed the degradation of the PlGF transcripts over time. As shown in Figure 3E, PlGF mRNA levels under ER stress were unchanged in the absence of transcription. This indicates that the reduction was not due to increased mRNA degradation and hence the observed changes in PlGF transcript level were due to changes in transcription. Furthermore, comparison of the rates of PlGF mRNA decline induced by tunicamycin and Act‐D alone shows that the rate with tunicamycin was relatively linear, whereas with Act‐D there was a 60% decrease in the first 3 h.
Transcription of PlGF is negatively regulated by ATF4 and ATF6β
The results presented in Figure 2B indicate a strong negative correlation between the levels of the transcription factor ATF4 and PlGF mRNA in placentae from pre‐eclampsia. Therefore, we examined whether the same correlation existed in the cell culture model in response to ER stress. There was a dose‐dependent increase of ATF4 mRNA upon increasing concentrations of tunicamycin (Figure 4A), which correlated closely (R 2 = 0.91) with the decline in PlGF mRNA (Figure 4B).
To provide direct evidence of a role of ATF4 in the regulation of PlGF transcription, we specifically knocked down ATF4 transcripts using siRNA. Application of siATF4 reduced ATF4 mRNA and protein by > 70% in both untreated and thapsigargin‐treated conditions (Figure 4C; see supplementary material, Figure S2A). siATF4 treatment also up‐regulated PlGF mRNA by 34% in untreated cells (Figure 4D). By contrast, in the presence of thapsigargin, PlGF transcripts were suppressed by 35% in siCon cells, but were restored by over 75% in siATF4‐treated cells (Figure 4D), confirming the role of ATF4 in the negative regulation of PlGF transcription.
In addition to ATF4, the transcription factors ATF6α, ATF6β and XBP‐1 are also involved in UPR pathways in response to ER stress. Nuclear localization of ATF6α and ATF6β in placentae from early‐onset pre‐eclampsia (Figure 1) was increased and our previous studies showed increased spliced XBP‐1 (activated form) mRNA in similar placentae 31. We therefore knocked down ATF6α, ATF6β and XBP‐1 transcripts using specific siRNAs. ATF6α, ATF6β and XBP‐1 mRNAs were suppressed by > 70% (see supplementary material, Figure S2B, C). siATF6α treatment did not affect ATF6β expression and vice versa (see supplementary material, Figure S2B). Levels of the PlGF transcript were not affected by siATF6α and siXBP‐1 in both untreated and thapsigargin‐treated cells (Figure 5A, D). However, following siATF6β treatment, we observed a 65% increase of PlGF mRNA in untreated cells, although the increase did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.11) in the thapsigargin‐treated condition (Figure 5B).
Activated ATF6β has been shown to interact with ATF6α, thereby inhibiting UPR‐mediated gene expression 49. Therefore, we investigated whether ATF6β might modulate ATF6α‐ or ATF4‐mediated PlGF gene expression. siRNA‐mediated double knockdown of ATF6β + ATF4 and ATF6α + β genes was performed in the presence of thapsigargin. Application of siATF6α + β reduced ATF6α and ATF6β transcript levels by 80% and 60%, respectively (see supplementary material, Figure S2B). Knockdown of both ATF6α and β did not significantly enhance PlGF mRNA in either untreated or thapsigargin‐treated cells (Figure 5C). By contrast, in the siATF6β + siATF4 double knockdown, we observed a synergistic effect in up‐regulation of PlGF transcript levels. In comparison to siCon, siATF6β + siATF4 caused a 2.4‐fold increase of PlGF mRNA in both untreated and thapsigargin‐treated cells (Figure 5C).
Hypoxia–reoxygenation modulates PlGF transcription inhibition, which is partially regulated through ATF4 and ATF6β
Poor placentation induces hypoxia–reperfusion, resulting in placental oxidative stress, a key feature of the pathophysiology of growth restriction and early‐onset pre‐eclampsia 50. Therefore, an in vitro model of repetitive hypoxia–reoxygenation (rHR), in which cells were repeatedly exposed to 6 h cycles of 1% and 10% O2 for 24 h, was used as a more physiological model of stress. PlGF mRNA was reduced ∼50% after 24 h of rH/R (Figure 6A). Application of siATF4 and siATF6β, individually or in combination, partially restored PlGF mRNA levels but was not as efficient as when used with the ER stress‐inducer thapsigargin (Figure 6B). These results suggest that other transcription factors, such as MTF1 and NF‐κB, may contribute to regulation of PlGF transcription under oxidative stress.
Discussion
Maternal circulating PlGF increases as pregnancy advances, reaching a peak at around 29–32 weeks before declining thereafter 18. In pregnancies complicated with early‐onset pre‐eclampsia and growth restriction, circulating PlGF concentrations are lower throughout gestation compared to normal controls 18, 51, 52. The reduction of circulating PlGF is much more pronounced compared to age‐matched controls in early‐onset pre‐eclampsia than in the late‐onset form of the syndrome 53. Ranking the three pathologies according to their circulating PlGF levels reveals that early‐onset pre‐eclampsia has the lowest concentration, followed by growth restriction and late‐onset pre‐eclampsia. These clinical observations suggest a negative relationship between the severity of placental ER stress and the maternal circulating PlGF level. In this study, we demonstrate that PlGF is indeed regulated at the transcriptional level by the UPR transcription factors ATF4 and ATF6β, resulting in a reduction of PlGF secretion.
A limitation of our study is that we were not able to compare the pathological placentae with age‐matched controls. Most pre‐term deliveries of normotensive pregnancies occur by vaginal delivery, due to conditions such as chorioamnionitis. These placentae display high levels of ER stress, due to either the underlying pathology or the delivery process 35, and so are not suitable as controls in this setting. Obtaining normal placentae delivered by caesarean section at 25 weeks, the earliest pathological cases studied here, is almost impossible ethically. Nonetheless, we do not consider that our findings can be attributed to differences in gestational age. First, concentrations of PlGF fall in late gestation, as described above, and so would be expected to be lower, rather than higher, in the term controls. Second, the strong negative correlation between between PlGF and ATF4 mRNAs shown in Figure 2B is independent of gestational age and placental pathology.
Due to the unique role of PlGF in the modulation of VEGF‐A signalling during endothelial cell homeostasis and angiogenesis, especially in a stressed environment 54, the low circulating PlGF concentration is widely accepted as one of the key contributors to maternal endothelial cell dysfunction in pre‐eclampsia 3, 20, 51. Surprisingly, another key angiogenic factor, VEGF‐A, is increased in the circulation of pre‐eclamptic patients 55. This may also reflect placental ER stress, since ATF4 and IRE1α positively regulate VEGF gene expression 35, 56. However, the biological activity of VEGF‐A is complicated by the fact that it is largely bound to its antagonist sFlt1, which is also elevated. Consequently, there is a reduction in free circulating VEGF‐A, further compromising maternal vascular function 24. Placental oxidative stress induces secretion of sFlt1 through p38 kinase signalling 57. ER stress also activates p38 kinase via the IRE1α–TRAF2 pathway 58, 59, thereby potentially contributing to modulation of sFlt1 secretion.
All three UPR pathways are strongly activated in placentae from early‐onset pre‐eclampsia, but to only subtle degrees in late‐onset cases 32. Our results are thus consistent with the remarkable increase of maternal circulating sFlt1 and reduction of PlGF in early‐onset pre‐eclampsia, and the minimal changes seen in the late‐onset form of the syndrome 53. Taken together, these findings suggest a potential vital role of placental ER stress in the modulation of maternal endothelial cell function via regulation of the synthesis and secretion of pro‐angiogenic and anti‐angiogenic factors in response to haemodynamic challenges (Figure 6).
The exact mechanism of the synergistic inhibitory effect of ATF4 and ATF6β in the regulation of PlGF transcription remains to be elucidated. However, a recent study reported that there are two functional cAMP responsive elements (CREs) in the PlGF promoter, and that the CREBs can up‐regulate PlGF gene expression upon cAMP stimulation 30. Coincidently, ATF4 and ATF6β are also known as cAMP‐responsive element binding protein 2 (CREBP2) and cAMP‐responsive element‐binding protein‐like 1 (CREBPL‐1), respectively. They belong to a family of DNA‐binding proteins including the AP‐1 family of transcription factors, cAMP‐response element binding proteins (CREBs) and CREB‐like proteins, indicating their potential interaction with CREs. Although both ATF6α and ATF6β show high structural similarity to each other, undergo the same proteolytic cleavage to generate their activated forms and bind to the same regulatory elements, they exhibit isoform‐specific transcriptional activation and stability characteristics 60, 61. Activated ATF6β is a relatively poor inducer of UPR response genes, but has much greater stability than activated ATF6α 60, 61. An in vitro DNA‐binding experiment demonstrated that recombinant activated ATF6β inhibits the binding of recombinant activated ATF6α to an UPR response element from the target gene promoter 49. We therefore speculate that one of the potential mechanisms is ATF4 and ATF6β act synergistically to interact directly or indirectly with CRE in the PlGF promoter, thereby inhibiting CREBs‐mediated PlGF transcription. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that the increase of both placental and maternal circulating adrenomedullin, a ligand that increases intracellular cAMP via G‐protein‐coupled receptors and adenylate cyclase, in pre‐eclampsia does not result in the expected rise in PlGF 62, 63.
The majority of secreted proteins are glycoproteins, and glycosylation is crucial for their stability, functional activity and half‐life in the circulation 64. Our previous publication demonstrated that glycosylation of secreted proteins is altered upon ER stress, and that their activity was compromised 65. PlGF contains two glycosylation sites, and so its activity is expected to be influenced by ER stress. Therefore, we speculate that ER stress not only suppresses PlGF transcription but may also modulate its bioactivity. Further experiments will be required to address this hypothesis. Furthermore, ER stress could also affect the fetal vasculature of the placenta through modulation of the expression and activities of the PlGF and VEGF receptors, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2/KDR. In placentae from early‐onset pre‐eclampsia, immunostaining of ATF4 and ATF6α was also increased in the endothelial cells of the fetal capillaries, indicating the existence of ER stress in these vessels (Figure 1). VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 are present in both the syncytiotrophoblast and the capillary endothelial cells 66, and VEGFR2 expression is decreased in pre‐eclamptic placentae 67. A recent study reported that administration of an ER stress inducer (tunicamycin) to pregnant mice is associated with a reduction of VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 mRNA expression in the placenta 68, suggesting a potential role for ER stress in regulation of these receptors. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that the glycosylation of VEGFR2 is crucial for its activity 69, and likely to be influenced by ER stress. Indeed, in placentae from pre‐eclampsia, VEGFR1 (Flt1) and endoglin are hyperglycosylated compared to normotensive control placentae 20.
To conclude, our previous publications demonstrated that in cases of early‐onset pre‐eclampsia and FGR placental ER stress causes protein synthesis inhibition that contributes to the growth‐restricted phenotype. In this study, we reveal that another consequence of placental ER stress is the down‐regulation of PlGF transcription, which is likely to contribute to the reduction in maternal circulating PlGF, which in turn may modulate maternal endothelial cell function and thereby contribute to the pathophysiology of the syndrome. These new findings further support the concept that alleviation of placental ER stress may provide a new therapeutic target for the treatment of early‐onset pre‐eclampsia and FGR.
Author contributions
MM, GJB, DSC‐J and HWY designed the study; MO identified and obtained consent from the patients and obtained the placental samples; MM, TC‐D and HWY performed the experiments; and MM, GJB, DSC‐J and HWY analysed the data and wrote the paper. All authors approved the final version.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL ON THE INTERNET.
The following supplementary material may be found in the online version of this article:
Supplementary materials and methods
Figure S1. No correlation was found between PlGF and ATF6α or ATF6β in pre‐eclamptic placentae
Figure S2. Small RNA interference treatment is effective in knocking down of corresponding transcripts
Table S1. The primer sequences used for quantitative real‐time RT‐PCR and their corresponding amplicon sizes.
Supporting information
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Wellcome Trust (Grant No. 084804/2/08/Z).
No conflicts of interest were declared.
References
- 1. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, et al. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 2006; 367: 1066–1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Roberts JM, Bell MJ. If we know so much about preeclampsia, why haven't we cured the disease? J Reprod Immunol 2013; 99: 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Lapaire O, Shennan A, Stepan H. The preeclampsia biomarkers soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase‐1 and placental growth factor: current knowledge, clinical implications and future application. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 151: 122–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Redman CW, Sargent IL. Latest advances in understanding preeclampsia. Science 2005; 308: 1592–1594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Tranquilli AL, Brown MA, Zeeman GG, et al. The definition of severe and early‐onset preeclampsia. Statements from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Pregnancy Hypertens 2013; 3: 44–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Roberts JM, Redman CW. Pre‐eclampsia: more than pregnancy‐induced hypertension. Lancet 1993; 341: 1447–1451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Powe CE, Levine RJ, Karumanchi SA. Preeclampsia, a disease of the maternal endothelium: the role of antiangiogenic factors and implications for later cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2011; 123: 2856–2869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Verlohren S, Stepan H, Dechend R. Angiogenic growth factors in the diagnosis and prediction of pre‐eclampsia. Clin Sci (Lond) 2012; 122: 43–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Maglione D, Guerriero V, Viglietto G, et al. Isolation of a human placenta cDNA coding for a protein related to the vascular permeability factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88: 9267–9271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Autiero M, Waltenberger J, Communi D, et al. Role of PlGF in the intra‐ and intermolecular crosstalk between the VEGF receptors Flt1 and Flk1. Nat Med 2003; 9: 936–943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hauser S, Weich HA. A heparin‐binding form of placenta growth factor (PlGF‐2) is expressed in human umbilical vein endothelial cells and in placenta. Growth Factors 1993; 9: 259–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Khaliq A, Li XF, Shams M, et al. Localisation of placenta growth factor (PIGF) in human term placenta. Growth Factors 1996; 13: 243–250; colour plates I, II, pre bk cov. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Cao Y, Ji WR, Qi P, et al. Placenta growth factor: identification and characterization of a novel isoform generated by RNA alternative splicing. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997; 235: 493–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Khaliq A, Dunk C, Jiang J, et al. Hypoxia down‐regulates placenta growth factor, whereas fetal growth restriction up‐regulates placenta growth factor expression: molecular evidence for 'placental hyperoxia' in intrauterine growth restriction. Lab Invest 1999; 79: 151–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Yang W, Ahn H, Hinrichs M, et al. Evidence of a novel isoform of placenta growth factor (PlGF‐4) expressed in human trophoblast and endothelial cells. J Reprod Immunol 2003; 60: 53–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Park JE, Chen HH, Winer J, et al. Placenta growth factor. Potentiation of vascular endothelial growth factor bioactivity, in vitro and in vivo, and high affinity binding to Flt‐1 but not to Flk‐1/KDR. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 25646–25654. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Cowans NJ, Stamatopoulou A, Matwejew E, et al. First‐trimester placental growth factor as a marker for hypertensive disorders and SGA. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 565–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Levine RJ, Maynard SE, Qian C, et al. Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 672–683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Levine RJ, Lam C, Qian C, et al. Soluble endoglin and other circulating antiangiogenic factors in preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 992–1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Gu Y, Lewis DF, Wang Y. Placental productions and expressions of soluble endoglin, soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase receptor‐1, and placental growth factor in normal and preeclamptic pregnancies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93: 260–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Cindrova‐Davies T, Yung HW, Johns J, et al. Oxidative stress, gene expression, and protein changes induced in the human placenta during labor. Am J Pathol 2007; 171: 1168–1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Keck PJ, Hauser SD, Krivi G, et al. Vascular permeability factor, an endothelial cell mitogen related to PDGF. Science 1989; 246: 1309–1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Leung DW, Cachianes G, Kuang WJ, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen. Science 1989; 246: 1306–1309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Maynard SE, Min JY, Merchan J, et al. Excess placental soluble fms‐like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia. J Clin Invest 2003; 111: 649–658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Cindrova‐Davies T, Sanders DA, Burton GJ, et al. Soluble FLT1 sensitizes endothelial cells to inflammatory cytokines by antagonizing VEGF receptor‐mediated signalling. Cardiovasc Res 2011; 89: 671–679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Green CJ, Lichtlen P, Huynh NT, et al. Placenta growth factor gene expression is induced by hypoxia in fibroblasts: a central role for metal transcription factor‐1. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 2696–2703. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Cramer M, Nagy I, Murphy BJ, et al. NF‐κB contributes to transcription of placenta growth factor and interacts with metal responsive transcription factor‐1 in hypoxic human cells. Biol Chem 2005; 386: 865–872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Chang M, Mukherjea D, Gobble RM, et al. Glial cell missing 1 regulates placental growth factor (PGF) gene transcription in human trophoblast. Biol Reprod 2008; 78: 841–851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Alpini G, Glaser SS, Zhang JP, et al. Regulation of placenta growth factor by microRNA‐125b in hepatocellular cancer. J Hepatol 2011; 55: 1339–1345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Depoix C, Tee MK, Taylor RN. Molecular regulation of human placental growth factor (PlGF) gene expression in placental villi and trophoblast cells is mediated via the protein kinase a pathway. Reprod Sci 2011; 18: 219–228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Yung HW, Calabrese S, Hynx D, et al. Evidence of placental translation inhibition and endoplasmic reticulum stress in the etiology of human intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Pathol 2008; 173: 451–462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Yung HW, Atkinson D, Campion‐Smith T, et al. Differential activation of placental unfolded protein response pathways implies heterogeneity in causation of early‐ and late‐onset pre‐eclampsia. J Pathol 2014; 234: 262–276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Ron D, Walter P. Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8: 519–529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Yung HW, Korolchuk S, Tolkovsky AM, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress exacerbates ischemia–reperfusion‐induced apoptosis through attenuation of Akt protein synthesis in human choriocarcinoma cells. FASEB J 2007; 21: 872–884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Ghosh R, Lipson KL, Sargent KE, et al. Transcriptional regulation of VEGF‐A by the unfolded protein response pathway. PLoS One 2010; 5: e9575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Harding HP, Zhang Y, Zeng H, et al. An integrated stress response regulates amino acid metabolism and resistance to oxidative stress. Mol Cell 2003; 11: 619–633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Adachi Y, Yamamoto K, Okada T, et al. ATF6 is a transcription factor specializing in the regulation of quality control proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell Struct Funct 2008; 33: 75–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Lange PS, Chavez JC, Pinto JT, et al. ATF4 is an oxidative stress‐inducible, prodeath transcription factor in neurons in vitro and in vivo . J Exp Med 2008; 205: 1227–1242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Yamaguchi S, Ishihara H, Yamada T, et al. ATF4‐mediated induction of 4E‐BP1 contributes to pancreatic β cell survival under endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell Metab 2008; 7: 269–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Wikstrom AK, Nash P, Eriksson UJ, et al. Evidence of increased oxidative stress and a change in the plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)‐1:PAI‐2 ratio in early‐onset but not late‐onset preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 597 e591–598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Colleoni F, Padmanabhan N, Yung HW, et al. Suppression of mitochondrial electron transport chain function in the hypoxic human placenta: a role for miRNA‐210 and protein synthesis inhibition. PLoS One 2013; 8: e55194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Yung HW, Cox M, Tissot van Patot M, et al. Evidence of endoplasmic reticulum stress and protein synthesis inhibition in the placenta of non‐native women at high altitude. FASEB J 2012; 26: 1970–1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Hong M, Luo S, Baumeister P, et al. Underglycosylation of ATF6 as a novel sensing mechanism for activation of the unfolded protein response. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 11354–11363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Ye J, Rawson RB, Komuro R, et al. ER stress induces cleavage of membrane‐bound ATF6 by the same proteases that process SREBPs. Mol Cell 2000; 6: 1355–1364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Hong M, Li M, Mao C, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress triggers an acute proteasome‐dependent degradation of ATF6. J Cell Biochem 2004; 92: 723–732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Vattem KM, Wek RC. Reinitiation involving upstream ORFs regulates ATF4 mRNA translation in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 11269–11274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Wang Y, Shen J, Arenzana N, et al. Activation of ATF6 and an ATF6 DNA binding site by the endoplasmic reticulum stress response. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 27013–27020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Lee K, Tirasophon W, Shen X, et al. IRE1‐mediated unconventional mRNA splicing and S2P‐mediated ATF6 cleavage merge to regulate XBP1 in signaling the unfolded protein response. Genes Dev 2002; 16: 452–466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Thuerauf DJ, Marcinko M, Belmont PJ, et al. Effects of the isoform‐specific characteristics of ATF6α and ATF6β on endoplasmic reticulum stress response gene expression and cell viability. J Biol Chem 2007; 282: 22865–22878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Burton GJ, Yung HW, Cindrova‐Davies T, et al. Placental endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of unexplained intrauterine growth restriction and early onset preeclampsia. Placenta 2009; 30(suppl A): S43–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Ohkuchi A, Hirashima C, Matsubara S, et al. Alterations in placental growth factor levels before and after the onset of preeclampsia are more pronounced in women with early onset severe preeclampsia. Hypertens Res 2007; 30: 151–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Romero R, Nien JK, Espinoza J, et al. A longitudinal study of angiogenic (placental growth factor) and anti‐angiogenic (soluble endoglin and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐1) factors in normal pregnancy and patients destined to develop preeclampsia and deliver a small for gestational age neonate. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008; 21: 9–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Wikstrom AK, Larsson A, Eriksson UJ, et al. Placental growth factor and soluble FMS‐like tyrosine kinase‐1 in early‐onset and late‐onset preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 1368–1374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Carmeliet P, Moons L, Luttun A, et al. Synergism between vascular endothelial growth factor and placental growth factor contributes to angiogenesis and plasma extravasation in pathological conditions. Nat Med 2001; 7: 575–583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Baker PN, Krasnow J, Roberts JM, et al. Elevated serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86: 815–821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Drogat B, Auguste P, Nguyen DT, et al. IRE1 signaling is essential for ischemia‐induced vascular endothelial growth factor‐A expression and contributes to angiogenesis and tumor growth in vivo . Cancer Res 2007; 67: 6700–6707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Cindrova‐Davies T, Spasic‐Boskovic O, Jauniaux E, et al. Nuclear factor‐κB, p38, and stress‐activated protein kinase mitogen‐activated protein kinase signaling pathways regulate proinflammatory cytokines and apoptosis in human placental explants in response to oxidative stress: effects of antioxidant vitamins. Am J Pathol 2007; 170: 1511–1520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Ichijo H. From receptors to stress‐activated MAP kinases. Oncogene 1999; 18: 6087–6093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Urano F, Wang X, Bertolotti A, et al. Coupling of stress in the ER to activation of JNK protein kinases by transmembrane protein kinase IRE1. Science 2000; 287: 664–666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Yoshida H, Haze K, Yanagi H, et al. Identification of the cis‐acting endoplasmic reticulum stress response element responsible for transcriptional induction of mammalian glucose‐regulated proteins. Involvement of basic leucine zipper transcription factors. J Biol Chem 1998; 273: 33741–33749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Thuerauf DJ, Morrison LE, Hoover H, et al. Coordination of ATF6‐mediated transcription and ATF6 degradation by a domain that is shared with the viral transcription factor, VP16. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 20734–20739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Di Iorio R, Marinoni E, Letizia C, et al. Adrenomedullin, a new vasoactive peptide, is increased in preeclampsia. Hypertension 1998; 32: 758–763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Gratton RJ, Gluszynski M, Mazzuca DM, et al. Adrenomedullin messenger ribonucleic acid expression in the placentae of normal and preeclamptic pregnancies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88: 6048–6055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Hoffmann T, Penel C, Ronin C. Glycosylation of human prolactin regulates hormone bioactivity and metabolic clearance. J Endocrinol Invest 1993; 16: 807–816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Yung HW, Hemberger M, Watson ED, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress disrupts placental morphogenesis: implications for human intrauterine growth restriction. J Pathol 2012; 228: 554–564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Chung JY, Song Y, Wang Y, et al. Differential expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), endocrine gland derived‐VEGF, and VEGF receptors in human placentas from normal and preeclamptic pregnancies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89: 2484–2490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Groten T, Gebhard N, Kreienberg R, et al. Differential expression of VE‐cadherin and VEGFR2 in placental syncytiotrophoblast during preeclampsia – new perspectives to explain the pathophysiology. Placenta 2010; 31: 339–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Kawakami T, Yoshimi M, Kadota Y, et al. Prolonged endoplasmic reticulum stress alters placental morphology and causes low birth weight. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2014; 275: 134–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Takahashi T, Shibuya M. The 230 kDa mature form of KDR/Flk‐1 (VEGF receptor‐2) activates the PLC‐γ pathway and partially induces mitotic signals in NIH3T3 fibroblasts. Oncogene 1997; 14: 2079–2089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.