Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 9.
Published in final edited form as: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Oct;1210:1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05781.x

New cancer targets emerging from studies of the Von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein

William G Kaelin Jr 1
PMCID: PMC4784475  NIHMSID: NIHMS460682  PMID: 20973793

Abstract

Inactivation of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein (pVHL) causes the most common form of kidney cancer. pVHL is part of a complex that polyubiquitinates the alpha subunit of the heterodimeric transcription factor HIF. In the presence of oxygen HIFa is prolyl hydroxylated by EglN1 (also called PHD2). This modification recruits pVHL, which then targets HIFa for proteasomal degradation. In hypoxic, or pVHL-defective, cells HIFa accumulates, binds to HIFb, and transcriptionally activates genes such as VEGF. VEGF inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors, which indirectly affect HIF, are now approved for the treatment of kidney cancer. EglN1 is a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase. Such enzymes can be inhibited with drug-like small molecules. EglN1 inhibitors are currently being tested for the treatment of anemia. EglN2 (PHD1) and EglN3 (PHD3), which are EglNs paralogs, appear to play HIF-independent roles in cell proliferation and apoptosis, respectively, and are garnering interest as potential cancer targets. A number of JmjC-containing proteins, including RBP2 and PLU-1, are 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases that demethylate histones. Preclinical data suggest that inhibition of RBP2 or PLU-1 would suppress tumor growth.

Keywords: cancer, tumor suppressor protein, transcription factor


Individuals bearing a germline, loss of function, mutation of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor gene, which resides on chromosome 3p25, develop von Hippel-Lindau disease 1. This hereditary cancer syndrome is characterized by an increased risk of developing a number of tumors including hemangioblastomas of the retina, cerebellum, and spinal cord, clear cell renal carcinomas, pheochromocytomas, endolymphatic sac tumors, pancreatic islet cell tumors, and cyst adenomas of the broad ligament or epididymis. Tumor development in this setting is linked to inactivation or loss of the remaining wild-type VHL allele in a susceptible cell. Biallelic VHL inactivation, either due to somatic mutations or hypermethylation, is also common in sporadic clear cell renal carcinomas, which are the most common form of kidney cancer.

The VHL gene product, pVHL, is the substrate recognition component of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex that, in the presence of oxygen, directly interacts with the alpha subunit of the heterodimeric HIF (hypoxia-inducible factor) transcription factor and orchestrates its polyubiquitination and destruction 2. When oxygen levels are low, or pVHL is defective, HIFα accumulates, dimerizes with its partner protein HIFβ (also called the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator or ARNT), and transcriptionally activates 100–200 genes, many of which promote survival in a hypoxic environment including genes that promote angiogenesis, erythropoiesis, and maintenance of energy homeostasis through changes in metabolism.

Recognition of HIFα by pVHL requires that the former be hydroxylated on one (or both) of two prolyl residues by members of the EglN (also called PHD) family of prolyl hydroxylases 2 (Fig 1). This reaction is intrinsically oxygen-dependent because the oxygen atom of the hydroxyl group is derived from molecular oxygen and because the oxygen Kms for these enzymes are just slightly above that encountered in normal tissues 3, 4. As a result, decrements in oxygen availability lead to decreased HIFα hydroxylation. In addition to oxygen these enzymes require ferrous iron, ascorbate, and 2-oxoglutarate (also called α-ketoglutarate). The latter is decarboxylated to succinate during the course of the hydroxylation reaction (Fig 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Prolyl Hydroxylation of HIFα. When oxygen is present HIFα becomes hydroxylated on one (or both) of two prolyl residues by members of the EglN (also called PHD) family in a reaction that requires ferrous iron and 2-oxoglutarate. Hydroxylation targets HIFα, which targets it for degradation, is coupled to the decarboxylation of 2-oxoglutarate to succinate.

EglN1 (also called PHD2) appears to be the primary HIF prolyl hydroxylase under normal conditions, with EglN2 and EglN3 playing compensatory roles under certain conditions 57. Inactivation of EglN1 in mice leads to polycythemia resulting from overproduction of erythropoietin by the kidney and germline EglN1 mutations have been linked to familial polycythemia in man 811. During fetal life the liver is the main source of erythropoietin production, with the kidney assuming this role shortly after birth. As a result, chronic renal failure, which affects over 20 million Americans, is often associated with chronic anemia 12. We recently showed, however, that inactivation of all 3 EglN paralogs is sufficient to reactivate hepatic erythropoietin production 13. In keeping with this, EglN inhibitory drugs can induce erythropoietin in anephric mice 14 and are currently being tested for the treatment of anemia in man.

pVHL has also been linked to other cellular activities that appear to be, at least partly, HIF-independent. For example, pVHL plays roles in maintenance of the primary cilium, microtubule stability, senescence, and apoptosis 15, 16. Many of these activities could, conceivably, contribute to the tumor suppressor activity of pVHL. Nonetheless, genotype-phenotype correlations in VHL patients suggest that deregulation of HIF contributes to the pathogenesis of clear cell renal carcinomas and hemangioblastomas (the same does not appear to be true for pheochromocytomas) 15, 16. Moreover preclinical data as well as clinical observations, outlined below, strongly suggest that increased HIF activity plays a causal role in clear cell renal carcinoma.

There are 3 HIFα family members called HIF1α, HIF2α, and HIF3α. HIF1α is the canonical, well-studied, HIFα family member and is ubiquitiously expressed. The expression of HIF2α is more restricted and it is increasingly clear that the functions of HIF1α and HIF2α only partially overlap. For example, HIF1α and HIF2α share many, but not all, of their transcriptional targets. In addition, the two proteins differ with respect to crosstalk with other transcription factors such a c-Myc, where HIF1α potentiates, and HIF2α antagonizes, c-Myc activity in certain settings 17, 18.

pVHL-defective clear cell renal carcinomas produce HIF2α alone or both HIF1α and HIF2α 19. Overproduction of a stabilized version of HIF2α, but not HIF1α, can override pVHL’s ability to suppress tumor growth in nude mouse xenograft assays 20, 21. Conversely, eliminating HIF2α is sufficient to inhibit pVHL-defective tumor growth in vivo 22, 23. In genetically engineered mouse models the phenotypes observed after pVHL inactivation appear to be largely driven by HIF2α 2427. Finally, the appearance of HIF2α in preneoplastic renal lesions in VHL patients heralds malignant transformation as determined by increased signs of dysplasia 28. Collectively, these findings support an important role for HIF2α in clear cell renal carcinoma.

These considerations have prompted the preclinical and clinical testing of drugs that, directly or indirectly, inhibit HIF2α or its downstream targets for the treatment of kidney cancer. For example, human kidney cancers produce very high levels of VEGF, presumably because VEGF is a HIF target, and respond to VEGF blockade in the clinic. Indeed, four drugs that inhibit VEGF (bevacizumab) or its receptor, KDR (sunitinib, sorafenib, and pazopanib) have been approved for this indication based on positive Phase 3 trial data in metastatic kidney cancer 2932. The rapamycin-like drugs (rapalogs) temsirolimus and everolimus, which inhibit the mTOR kinase, have also been approved for the treatment of kidney cancer 33, 34. These agents indirectly downregulate HIFα within cancer cells and probably also blunt signaling downstream of VEGF in endothelial cells. Unfortunately, rapalogs preferentially inhibit mTOR when it is part of the TORC1 complex rather than part of the TORC2 complex 35. A recent report suggested that HIF1α is regulated by TORC1 whereas HIF2α is under the control of TORC2 36. It will be of interest to see if second generation mTOR inhibitors that inhibit both TORC1 and TORC2 will have greater activity in kidney cancer by virtue of more effective TORC2 blockade.

Kidney cancer patients treated with VEGF inhibitors or mTOR inhibitors invariably relapse and the resistance mechanisms are poorly understood. Curative therapy for kidney cancer will almost certainly require combinations of agents that have distinct mechanisms of action and which are non-cross resistant. New targets for kidney cancer will likely be produced by several lines of investigation. For example, state of the art genomic technologies, including high density SNP arrays, expression profiling, and exon resequencing, are being used in an attempt to identify the mutations that cooperate with pVHL loss to cause kidney cancer 3741. In addition targets that, when inhibited, preferentially kill pVHL-defective cells due to synthetic lethal interactions are being sought by exposing isogenic cell line pairs to collections of shRNA vectors or chemical perturbants 42, 43. One recent study, for example, found that pVHL-defective cells are especially sensitive to agents that induce autophagy 43. This finding is of special interest given the clinical activity of rapalogs, which likewise promote autophagy.

Germline mutations affecting succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) and fumarate hydratase (FH) have recently linked to cancer and are also potentially linked to HIF deregulation 44. The former have been linked to familial paragangliomas (including pheochromocytomas) and the latter to familial leiomyomatosis (cutaneous and uterine) and papillary renal carcinoma. SDH and FH mutations lead to the accumulation of succinate and fumarate, respectively, which interfere with the activities of 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases, including the EglNs 4549. As a result, these mutations lead to inappropriate HIF activation and a state of “pseudohypoxia”. Whether HIF is simply a marker of altered metabolism in these settings, or is an actual driver, is currently being explored. For example, indirect evidence, including genotype-phenotype correlations in VHL disease, argue that HIF deregulation does not play a causal role in pheochromocytoma 16. Interestingly, mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) have been observed in some leukemias and brain tumors 5054. These mutations result in the production of 2-hydroxyglutarate, which is also suspected of altered 2-oxoglutrate-dependent enzyme activity 5557.

Enzymes are preferred targets in the pharmaceutical industry because they frequently contain clefts or pockets that can bind to drug-like small organic molecules. Indeed, many recently approved anticancer agents are small ATP-like molecules that inhibit particular kinases. The EglN prolyl hydroxylases belong to a much larger superfamily of iron and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases 58. These enzymes can be inhibited with drug-like molecules that interfere with either iron or 2-oxoglutarate utilization. A further exploration of the biology of these enzymes therefore seems warranted.

EglN1 (PHD2) is being explored as a potential target for anemia, as outline above. A recent study also found that haploinsufficiency for EglN1 suppressed tumor growth, apparently as a result of tumor vessel normalization 59. Therefore it is difficult to predict whether EglN1 inhibitors will have protumorigenic or antitumorigenic effects in vivo.

EglN2 and EglN3 appear to have HIF-independent functions that might be relevant to tumor growth. EglN2 (PHD1) is transcriptionally induced when estrogen receptor positive breast cancer cells are induced to proliferate with estrogen 60. We showed that EglN2, in a HIF-independent manner, indirectly controls Cyclin D1 61. Cyclin D1 levels are diminished in EglN2−/− cells and tissues including in lactating mammary glands, which display defects reminiscent of those seen in Cyclin D1−/− glands 62. Downregulation of EglN2, using shRNA technology, inhibits the proliferation of a variety of cancer cells, including breast cancer cells. This defect can be rescued by wild-type, but not catalytic-dead, EglN2 as well as by Cyclin D1 itself. These findings suggest that EglN2 inhibitors might have antitumor effects, especially in estrogen-dependent breast cancers.

EglN3 (PHD3) is induced when NGF is withdrawn from neurons and appears to be both necessary and sufficient to promote apoptosis in this setting 6366. EglN3 can also, at least when overproduced, induced apoptosis in a variety of cell types, in contrast to EglN1 and EglN2, and appears to do so in a HIF-independent manner 67, 68. How EglN3 induces apoptosis is incompletely understood but appears to involve KIF1Bβ, which is a candidate tumor suppressor located at 1p36 67, 69, 70. Recent studies suggest that EglN3 agonists, such as 2-oxoglutarate mimetics, might be used to augment cancer cell apoptosis 71, 72.

A number of histone demethylases that share a JmjC domain were recently found to belong to the 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase family 73, 74(Fig 2). Interestingly, a number of these appear to be overexpressed or mutated in cancer, including JAR1DA, JARID1B, JARID1C, UTX, and GASC1 37, 7580. JARID1A (also called RBP2 or KDM5A) was originally identified as cellular protein capable of binding to the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (pRB) 81. pRB can induce an acute G1/S block, promote senescence, and/or promote differentiation when reintroduced into pRB-defective tumor cells. Tumor suppression by pRB is due, at least in part, to its ability to repress E2F-dependent promoters. Surprisingly, we found that certain pRB variants (natural and engineered) that cannot bind to E2F, and are incapable of repressing transcription, can nonetheless promote senescence and differentiation 82. Such variants, however, preserve the ability to bind to JARID1A. Moreover, elimination of JARID1A, using either siRNA or genetically engineered cells, promotes senescence, differentiation, and loss of “stemness” in vitro 83(Qin Yan and W.G.K.-unpublished data). Conversely, a recent report suggested that increased expression of JARID1A mediates some forms of anticancer drug resistance by promoting a more stem cell-like phenotype 84. Similarly, JARID1B promotes breast cancer growth in vivo 85 and appears to maintain a stem cell-like melanoma cell population 86.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

JmjC Histone Demethylase Activity. Hydroxylation of a histone methyl group by a JmjC domain-containing histone methylase leads to histone demethylation as the hydroxylated methyl group is unstable and spontaneously given off as formaldehyde.

These considerations raise the possibility that changes in the levels of oxygen and specific metabolites (such as 2-oxoglutarate) will have protean biological effects through changes in the activities of various 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases, including the enzymes dedicated to the regulation of HIF and chromatin structure. As a corollary, drugs that inhibit specific members of this family of enzymes might ultimately proof useful in the treatment of a variety of human diseases, including cancer.

Acknowledgments

This article was supported by National Institute of Health (NIH).

References

  • 1.Kaelin WG. Molecular basis of the VHL hereditary cancer syndrome. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:673–82. doi: 10.1038/nrc885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kaelin WG, Jr, Ratcliffe PJ. Oxygen sensing by metazoans: the central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway. Mol Cell. 2008;30:393–402. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hirsila M, et al. Characterization of the human prolyl 4-hydroxylases that modify the hypoxia-inducible factor. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:30772–80. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304982200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McNeill LA, et al. The use of dioxygen by HIF prolyl hydroxylase (PHD1) Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2002;12:1547–50. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(02)00219-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Berra E, et al. HIF prolyl-hydroxylase 2 is the key oxygen sensor setting low steady-state levels of HIF-1alpha in normoxia. Embo J. 2003;22:4082–90. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Appelhoff RJ, et al. Differential function of the prolyl hydroxylases PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3 in the regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:38458–65. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406026200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Minamishima YA, et al. A feedback loop involving the Phd3 prolyl hydroxylase tunes the mammalian hypoxic response in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:5729–41. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00331-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Minamishima YA, et al. Somatic inactivation of the PHD2 prolyl hydroxylase causes polycythemia and congestive heart failure. Blood. 2008;111:3236–3244. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-117812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Takeda K, et al. Regulation of adult erythropoiesis by prolyl hydroxylase domain proteins. Blood. 2008;111:3229–3235. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-09-114561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Percy MJ, et al. A family with erythrocytosis establishes a role for prolyl hydroxylase domain protein 2 in oxygen homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:654–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508423103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Percy MJ, et al. A novel erythrocytosis-associated PHD2 mutation suggests the location of a HIF binding groove. Blood. 2007;110:2193–6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-04-084434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dowling TC. Prevalence, etiology, and consequences of anemia and clinical and economic benefits of anemia correction in patients with chronic kidney disease: an overview. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64:S3–7. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070181. quiz S23–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Minamishima YA, Kaelin WG., Jr Reactivation of hepatic EPO synthesis in mice after PHD loss. Science. 329:407. doi: 10.1126/science.1192811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Safran M, et al. Mouse model for noninvasive imaging of HIF prolyl hydroxylase activity: assessment of an oral agent that stimulates erythropoietin production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:105–10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509459103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kaelin WG., Jr The von Hippel-Lindau tumour suppressor protein: O2 sensing and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:865–73. doi: 10.1038/nrc2502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kaelin WG., Jr The von hippel-lindau tumor suppressor protein: an update. Methods Enzymol. 2007;435:371–83. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(07)35019-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gordan JD, et al. HIF-2alpha promotes hypoxic cell proliferation by enhancing c-myc transcriptional activity. Cancer Cell. 2007;11:335–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gordan JD, et al. HIF-alpha effects on c-Myc distinguish two subtypes of sporadic VHL-deficient clear cell renal carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Maxwell P, et al. The von Hippel-Lindau gene product is necessary for oxgyen-dependent proteolysis of hypoxia-inducible factor a subunits. Nature. 1999;399:271–5. doi: 10.1038/20459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kondo K, et al. Inhibition of HIF is necessary for tumor suppression by the von Hippel-Lindau protein. Cancer Cell. 2002;1:237–46. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00043-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Maranchie JK, et al. The contribution of VHL substrate binding and HIF1-alpha to the phenotype of VHL loss in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2002;1:247–55. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00044-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kondo K, et al. Inhibition of HIF2alpha Is Sufficient to Suppress pVHL-Defective Tumor Growth. PLoS Biol. 2003;1:E83. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zimmer M, et al. Inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor is sufficient for growth suppression of VHL−/− tumors. Mol Cancer Res. 2004;2:89–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kim WY, et al. Failure to prolyl hydroxylate hypoxia-inducible factor alpha phenocopies VHL inactivation in vivo. Embo J. 2006;25:4650–62. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rankin EB, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor-2 (HIF-2) regulates hepatic erythropoietin in vivo. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:1068–77. doi: 10.1172/JCI30117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rankin EB, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor-2 regulates vascular tumorigenesis in mice. Oncogene. 2008 doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rankin EB, et al. HIF-2 regulates hepatic lipid metabolism. Mol Cell Biol. 2009 doi: 10.1128/MCB.00200-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mandriota SJ, et al. HIF activation identifies early lesions in VHL kidneys: evidence for site-specific tumor suppressor function in the nephron. Cancer Cell. 2002;1:459–68. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00071-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Escudier B, et al. Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, double-blind phase III trial. Lancet. 2007;370:2103–11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61904-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Escudier B, et al. Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:125–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Motzer RJ, et al. Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:115–24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa065044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sternberg CN, et al. Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 28:1061–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hudes G, et al. A phase 3, randomized, 3-arm study of temsirolimus (TEMSR) or interferon-alpha (IFN) or the combination of TEMSR + IFN in the treatment of first-line, poor-risk patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (adv RCC). JCO, 2006 ASCO Annual Meetings Proceedings Part I; 2006. p. LBA4. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Motzer RJ, et al. Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Lancet. 2008;372:449–56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61039-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Guertin DA, Sabatini DM. Defining the role of mTOR in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:9–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Toschi A, et al. Differential dependence of HIF1alpha and HIF2alpha on mTORC1 and mTORC2. J Biol Chem. 2008 doi: 10.1074/jbc.C800170200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dalgliesh GL, et al. Systematic sequencing of renal carcinoma reveals inactivation of histone modifying genes. Nature. 2010;463:360–3. doi: 10.1038/nature08672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Beroukhim R, et al. Patterns of gene expression and copy-number alterations in von-hippel lindau disease-associated and sporadic clear cell carcinoma of the kidney. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4674–81. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chen M, et al. Genome-wide profiling of chromosomal alterations in renal cell carcinoma using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:2342–8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yoshimoto T, et al. High-resolution analysis of DNA copy number alterations and gene expression in renal clear cell carcinoma. J Pathol. 2007;213:392–401. doi: 10.1002/path.2239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cifola I, et al. Genome-wide screening of copy number alterations and LOH events in renal cell carcinomas and integration with gene expression profile. Mol Cancer. 2008;7:6. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-7-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bommi-Reddy A, et al. Kinase requirements in human cells: III. Altered kinase requirements in VHL−/− cancer cells detected in a pilot synthetic lethal screen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:16484–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806574105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Turcotte S, et al. A molecule targeting VHL-deficient renal cell carcinoma that induces autophagy. Cancer Cell. 2008;14:90–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kaelin WG., Jr SDH5 mutations and familial paraganglioma: somewhere Warburg is smiling. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:180–2. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Koivunen P, et al. Inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) hydroxylases by citric acid cycle intermediates: possible links between cell metabolism and stabilization of HIF. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:4524–32. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610415200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pollard PJ, et al. Accumulation of Krebs cycle intermediates and over-expression of HIF1alpha in tumours which result from germline FH and SDH mutations. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:2231–9. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Selak MA, et al. Succinate links TCA cycle dysfunction to oncogenesis by inhibiting HIF-alpha prolyl hydroxylase. Cancer Cell. 2005;7:77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pollard PJ, et al. Targeted inactivation of fh1 causes proliferative renal cyst development and activation of the hypoxia pathway. Cancer Cell. 2007;11:311–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dahia PL, et al. A HIF1alpha regulatory loop links hypoxia and mitochondrial signals in pheochromocytomas. PLoS Genet. 2005;1:72–80. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Balss J, et al. Analysis of the IDH1 codon 132 mutation in brain tumors. Acta Neuropathol. 2008;116:597–602. doi: 10.1007/s00401-008-0455-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Parsons DW, et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science. 2008;321:1807–12. doi: 10.1126/science.1164382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Watanabe T, et al. IDH1 mutations are early events in the development of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. Am J Pathol. 2009;174:1149–53. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yan H, et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:765–73. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Marcucci G, et al. IDH1 and IDH2 gene mutations identify novel molecular subsets within de novo cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. J Clin Oncol. 28:2348–55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.3730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ward PS, et al. The common feature of leukemia-associated IDH1 and IDH2 mutations is a neomorphic enzyme activity converting alpha-ketoglutarate to 2-hydroxyglutarate. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:225–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.01.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dang L, et al. Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature. 2009;462:739–44. doi: 10.1038/nature08617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gross S, et al. Cancer-associated metabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate accumulates in acute myelogenous leukemia with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations. J Exp Med. 2010;207:339–44. doi: 10.1084/jem.20092506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Aravind L, Koonin EV. The DNA-repair protein AlkB, EGL-9, and leprecan define new families of 2-oxoglutarate- and iron-dependent dioxygenases. Genome Bio. 2001;2:research0007.1–0007.8. doi: 10.1186/gb-2001-2-3-research0007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mazzone M, et al. Heterozygous deficiency of PHD2 restores tumor oxygenation and inhibits metastasis via endothelial normalization. Cell. 2009;136:839–51. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Seth P, et al. Novel estrogen and tamoxifen induced genes identified by SAGE (Serial Analysis of Gene Expression) Oncogene. 2002;21:836–43. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhang Q, et al. Control of cyclin D1 and breast tumorigenesis by the EglN2 prolyl hydroxylase. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:413–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.09.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sicinski P, et al. Cyclin D1 provides a link between development and oncogenesis in the retina and breast. Cell. 1995;82:621–30. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90034-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lee S, et al. Neuronal apoptosis linked to EglN3 prolyl hydroxylase and familial pheochromocytoma genes: Developmental culling and cancer. Cancer Cell. 2005;8:155–167. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lipscomb E, et al. Expression of the SM-20 gene promotes death in nerve growth factor-dependent sympathetic neurons. J Neurochem. 1999;73:429–432. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0730429.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lipscomb E, Sarmiere P, Freeman R. SM-20 is a novel mitochondrial protein that causes caspase-dependent cell death in nerve growth factor-dependent neurons. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:11775–11782. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008407200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bishop T, et al. Abnormal sympathoadrenal development and systemic hypotension in PHD3−/− mice. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:3386–400. doi: 10.1128/MCB.02041-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Schlisio S, et al. The kinesin KIF1Bbeta acts downstream from EglN3 to induce apoptosis and is a potential 1p36 tumor suppressor. Genes Dev. 2008;22:884–93. doi: 10.1101/gad.1648608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Rantanen K, et al. Prolyl Hydroxylase PHD3 Activates Oxygen-dependent Protein Aggregation. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19:2231–40. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-11-1124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Yeh IT, et al. A germline mutation of the KIF1B beta gene on 1p36 in a family with neural and nonneural tumors. Hum Genet. 2008;124:279–85. doi: 10.1007/s00439-008-0553-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Munirajan AK, et al. KIF1Bbeta functions as a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor gene mapped to chromosome 1p36.2 by inducing apoptotic cell death. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:24426–34. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802316200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.MacKenzie ED, et al. Cell-permeating alpha-ketoglutarate derivatives alleviate pseudohypoxia in succinate dehydrogenase-deficient cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:3282–9. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01927-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Tennant DA, et al. Reactivating HIF prolyl hydroxylases under hypoxia results in metabolic catastrophe and cell death. Oncogene. 2009;28:4009–21. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Klose RJ, Kallin EM, Zhang Y. JmjC-domain-containing proteins and histone demethylation. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7:715–27. doi: 10.1038/nrg1945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Takeuchi T, et al. Roles of jumonji and jumonji family genes in chromatin regulation and development. Dev Dyn. 2006;235:2449–59. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Cloos PA, et al. The putative oncogene GASC1 demethylates tri- and dimethylated lysine 9 on histone H3. Nature. 2006;442:307–11. doi: 10.1038/nature04837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Northcott PA, et al. Multiple recurrent genetic events converge on control of histone lysine methylation in medulloblastoma. Nat Genet. 2009;41:465–72. doi: 10.1038/ng.336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.van Haaften G, et al. Somatic mutations of the histone H3K27 demethylase gene UTX in human cancer. Nat Genet. 2009;41:521–3. doi: 10.1038/ng.349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Wang GG, et al. Haematopoietic malignancies caused by dysregulation of a chromatin-binding PHD finger. Nature. 2009;459:847–51. doi: 10.1038/nature08036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Barrett A, et al. PLU-1 nuclear protein, which is upregulated in breast cancer, shows restricted expression in normal human adult tissues: a new cancer/testis antigen? Int J Cancer. 2002;101:581–8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.van Zutven LJ, et al. Identification of NUP98 abnormalities in acute leukemia: JARID1A (12p13) as a new partner gene. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2006;45:437–46. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Defeo-Jones D, et al. Cloning of cDNAs for cellular proteins that bind to the retinoblastoma gene product. Nature. 1991;352:251–254. doi: 10.1038/352251a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Sellers WR, et al. Stable binding to E2F is not required for the retinoblastoma protein to activate transcription, promote differentiation, and suppress tumor cell growth. Genes and Dev. 1998;12:95–106. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.1.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Benevolenskaya EV, et al. Binding of pRB to the PHD Protein RBP2 Promotes Cellular Differentiation. Mol Cell. 2005;18:623–635. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Sharma SV, et al. A chromatin-mediated reversible drug-tolerant state in cancer cell subpopulations. Cell. 2010;141:69–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Yamane K, et al. PLU-1 is an H3K4 demethylase involved in transcriptional repression and breast cancer cell proliferation. Mol Cell. 2007;25:801–12. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Roesch A, et al. A temporarily distinct subpopulation of slow-cycling melanoma cells is required for continuous tumor growth. Cell. 2010;141:583–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES