Skip to main content
Breeding Science logoLink to Breeding Science
. 2016 Mar 1;66(2):319–327. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.66.319

Transfer of the Rsv3 locus from ‘Harosoy’ for resistance to soybean mosaic virus strains C and D in Japan

Shin Kato 1,*, Yoshitake Takada 2, Satoshi Shimamura 1, Kaori Hirata 1, Takashi Sayama 3, Fumio Taguchi-Shiobara 3, Masao Ishimoto 3, Akio Kikuchi 1, Takeshi Nishio 4
PMCID: PMC4785009  PMID: 27162503

Abstract

Resistance to soybean mosaic virus (SMV) is imperative for soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) production in the Tohoku region. Molecular markers for SMV resistance were previously reported for U.S. SMV strains, but they cannot be applied because of the differences in strain classification between Japan and the U.S. A U.S. variety ‘Harosoy’ has been used mainly as a donor of resistance to SMV strains C and D in a Japanese breeding program, resulting in resistant varieties such as ‘Fukuibuki.’ Because ‘Harosoy’ harbors the Rsv3 gene conferring resistance to the virulent SMV strain groups, G5 through G7, it appears that the Rsv3 gene confers resistance to strains C and D. In this study, we introduced resistance to the two strains from ‘Fukuibuki’ into a leading variety ‘Ohsuzu’ by recurrent backcrossing with marker-assisted selection. All lines selected with markers near Rsv3 showed resistance to the strains, suggesting that the Rsv3 locus is responsible for the resistance. Three years of trials showed that one of the breeding lines, ‘Tohoku 169,’ was equivalent to ‘Ohsuzu’ with respect to agricultural characteristics such as seed size, maturity date, and seed yield, except for the SMV resistance.

Keywords: Glycine max, soybean mosaic virus, SMV strains, Rsv3, marker-assisted selection

Introduction

Soybean mosaic virus (SMV), a member of the genus Potyvirus, is one of the most devastating diseases of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. SMV is carried to some extent through seeds from infected soybean plants and transmitted by aphids in a non-persistent manner (Hashimoto and Nagasawa 1986). Plants infected with SMV show mosaic discoloration and deformation of leaves and seed mottling, which reduce seed yield and degrade seed quality (Koshimizu and Iizuka 1963, Yamada et al. 2006). The virus is classified into six strains, A, A2, B, C, D, and E, on the basis of pathogenicity to a set of Japanese differential varieties (Nakano et al. 1982, Takahashi et al. 1980). SMV strains A and B are found in all parts of Japan, and strains C and D are mainly found in Kanto, Hokuriku, and the middle and southern parts of the Tohoku region (Hashimoto and Nagasawa 1986, Takahashi et al. 1980, Yagasaki et al. 2000). Thus, resistances to SMV strains C and D are indispensable characteristics in the breeding of cultivars for these areas.

In Japan, cultivars suitable for late sowing after wheat harvesting are needed for rotations, including rice, wheat, and soybean cultivations. However, late planting sometimes lead to late maturation that delays harvesting and/or to a decrease of seed weight that degrades the quality of soybean food products such as boiled bean (Beatty et al. 1982, Ishida and Tange 1984). Therefore, a cultivar with large seed weight and early maturation is needed. The cultivar ‘Ohsuzu,’ which was developed by the National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO): Tohoku Agricultural Research Center in 1998 (Tabuchi et al. 1999), possesses desirable agricultural characteristics, including large seed and early maturation. ‘Ohsuzu’ is one of the recommended cultivars in Aomori Prefecture (located in the northern part of the Tohoku region). It comprised 97.1% of the soybean cultivation area in this prefecture in 2013 according to the statistical data released by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan (http://www.maff.go.jp/j/seisan/ryutu/daizu/d_data/index.html). In addition, ‘Ohsuzu’ has high adaptability to plant growth in all parts of the Tohoku region, the Hokuriku region, and northern parts of the Kanto region (Tabuchi et al. 1999), but its cultivation is limited because of its susceptibility to SMV strains C and D. Development of a new cultivar having resistance to stains C and D and favorable agricultural characteristics similar to those of ‘Ohsuzu’ has been requested. To introduce resistance to strains C and D into ‘Ohsuzu,’ one of the most efficient methods is to develop backcross lines using ‘Ohsuzu’ as a recurrent parent by marker-assisted selection. However, DNA markers for resistance genes to strains C and D have not been developed.

In Japan, ‘Harosoy’ (PI 548573) (PI, plant introduction number in the United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service National Plant Germplasm System) has been used as a donor of resistance to SMV strains C and D, and some resistant cultivars, e.g., ‘Suzuyutaka,’ ‘Dewamusume,’ and ‘Fukuibuki,’ have been developed by NARO: Tohoku Agricultural Research Center (Hashimoto et al. 1984, Ishikawa et al. 1979, Shimada et al. 2004). Shigemori (1991) studied the mode of inheritance of SMV resistance by artificial inoculation tests in a greenhouse using F1 and F2 populations derived from three or five crosses between susceptible cultivars and the resistant cultivar ‘Suzuyutaka,’ whose resistances to SMV strains C and D originated in ‘Harosoy.’ It was concluded that each resistance to SMV strain C or D derived from ‘Harosoy’ was controlled by a single dominant gene and that the genes for resistance to strains C and D were strongly linked to each other, although it was unclear whether the single gene for resistance to SMV strain C was the same one as that to SMV strain D.

In the U.S., SMV has been classified into seven strains, G1, G2, G3, G4, G5, G6, and G7, on the basis of pathogenicity on a set of U.S. differential varieties, which differ from the Japanese varieties (Cho and Goodman 1979). Based on the genetic analysis of resistance to each strain, three independent single dominant resistance genes, Rsv1, Rsv3, and Rsv4, have been identified and mapped on chromosomes 13, 14, and 2, respectively (Gore et al. 2002, Hayes et al. 2000, Hayes and Saghai Maroof 2000, Jeong and Saghai Maroof 2004, Saghai Maroof et al. 2010, Shi et al. 2008). Nine resistance alleles of Rsv1 have been previously reported, and these Rsv1 alleles confer resistance to strains G1–G3, although the reactions to strains G4–G7 differed depending on the alleles of Rsv1 (Moon et al. 2009). In contrast, lines carrying a resistance allele of Rsv3 showed resistance to strains G5–G7 and susceptibility to strains G1–G4 (Gunduz et al. 2001). The resistance alleles of Rsv1 and Rsv3 are strain-specific and associated with hypersensitive reaction. Hayes et al. (2004) and Suh et al. (2011) have identified nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat clusters as candidate genes of Rsv1 and Rsv3. Rsv4 confers resistance to all strains from G1 to G7 and is suggested to reduce infection by restricting short- and long-distance movement of the virus (Gunduz et al. 2004). In addition, Gunduz et al. (2001) have shown, by investigating reactions to the SMV strains from G1 to G7, that ‘Harosoy’ carries susceptible alleles at the Rsv1 and Rsv4 loci and a resistance allele at the Rsv3 locus.

To exploit available information for introducing resistances to strains C and D into Japanese cultivars, relationships between the Japanese and U.S. strains of SMV should be clarified. Shigemori (1991) investigated the relationships by the artificial inoculation of U.S. differential varieties with the Japanese strains. Consequently, the Japanese strains were classified into three groups: one containing A and B, one containing C and D, and the other containing only E. Although strains A and B corresponded to strain G3, strains C, D, and E corresponded to no U.S. strains. Kanematsu and Nakano (2015) artificially inoculated the Japanese differential varieties with the U.S. strains. The U.S. strains were also classified into three groups: one containing G1 and G4; one containing G2, G3, G6, and G7; and the third containing only G5. Strains A and B corresponded to the group of G2, G3, G6, and G7 and the group of G1 and G4, respectively, and the pathogenicity of strain C was similar to that of G5, whereas strains D and E corresponded to no U.S. strains. The authors accordingly reported that it was impossible to clarify the complicated relationship between Japanese and U.S. strains using differential varieties. Thus, DNA markers for SMV resistance reported in the U.S. could not be used for soybean breeding in Japan.

Considering that ‘Harosoy’ has been used as a donor of resistance to SMV strains C and D in Japan and that these two resistances are controlled by a single dominant gene, the Rsv3 allele derived from ‘Harosoy’ is expected to confer resistances to strains C and D. In the present study, to verify the effect of the Rsv3 allele on the resistances to SMV strains C and D, the alleles of DNA markers covering a genomic region containing Rsv3 were compared between ‘Harosoy’ and ‘Fukuibuki,’ whose resistances to SMV strains C and D are derived from ‘Harosoy.’ In addition, backcross lines were developed for introducing the Rsv3 alleles derived from ‘Fukuibuki’ into ‘Ohsuzu’ (susceptible to SMV strains C and D) by marker-assisted selection to develop breeding lines with favorable agricultural characteristics similar to those of ‘Ohsuzu.’ The effect of the genomic regions near Rsv3 on agricultural characteristics was evaluated with yield trials.

Materials and Methods

Plant material

‘Ohsuzu’ and ‘Fukuibuki’ were used as plant materials (Supplemental Fig. 1). ‘Ohsuzu’ and ‘Fukuibuki’ were registered as ‘Soybean Norin No. 109’ in 1998 and ‘Soybean Norin No. 122’ in 2002, respectively. ‘Ohsuzu,’ which is susceptible to strains C and D, is classified into medium-early maturity in the Tohoku region and has large seed size at approximately 350 mg per seed (Tabuchi et al. 1999). ‘Fukuibuki,’ which is resistant to strains C and D, is classified into medium-late maturity in the Tohoku region and has a medium large seed size at approximately 300 mg per seed (Shimada et al. 2004). Ancestors of ‘Fukuibuki,’ namely ‘Harosoy,’ ‘Nemashirazu,’ ‘Tairadatezairai’ (JP28143), and ‘Dewamusume’ were also used for the genotyping of DNA markers near Rsv3. ‘Dewamusume’ has been reported to be resistant to strains C and D, similar to ‘Harosoy’ and ‘Fukuibuki,’ whereas ‘Nemashirazu’ and ‘Tairadatezairai’ have been reported to be susceptible to these strains, similar to ‘Ohsuzu’ (Ishikawa et al. 1979, Takahashi et al. 1987). Additionally, BC2F1 plants and a BC2F2 population were grown in 2004 and 2005, respectively, and the seeds of BC2F2:3 lines were obtained for inoculation tests. Differential varieties of SMV artificial inoculation tests and their resistances to SMV strains C and D were as follows: ‘Peking’ (JP28432) (JP, plant accession number of National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences Genebank), ‘Harosoy,’ ‘Dewamusume’ (resistant to the C and D strains), ‘Shiromame’ (JP27560) (resistant to the C strain, susceptible to the D strain), ‘Fukusennari’ (JP28295) (susceptible to the C strain, resistant to the D strain), ‘Ouu 3’ (JP27779), ‘Tokachinagaha’ (JP27439), ‘Nemashirazu (JP27696), and ‘Norin 4’ and ‘Tsurunotamago 1’ (JP27731) (susceptible to the C and D strains) (Hashimoto and Nagasawa 1987, Ishikawa et al. 1979, Takahashi et al. 1987).

DNA marker analysis

Marker alleles located near Rsv3 of ‘Ohsuzu,’ ‘Fukuibuki,’ and ancestors of ‘Fukuibuki’ were investigated. According to Suh et al. (2011), Rsv3 is located between A519F/R and M3Satt. Accordingly, simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers in the vicinity of A519F/R and M3Satt, namely Satt726, BARCSOYSSR_14_1403, BARCSOYSSR_14_1408, BARCSOYSSR_14_1410, BARCSOYSSR_14_1414, BARCSOYSSR_14_1416, M3Satt modified (hereafter, M3SattM), and Satt560 were used [Song et al. 2004, Song et al. 2010, Daizubase (http://daizu.dna.affrc.go.jp/)] (Fig. 1, Supplemental Table 1). The position of each DNA marker on a physical map was based on the soybean genome database Wm82.a1 (Schmutz et al. 2010). Sizing of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragments amplified with fluorescently-labeled SSR markers was performed with a 3730 Genetic Analyzer DNA sequencer [Applied Biosystems (now Life Technologies), CA, U.S.], according to Sayama et al. (2011). Graphical genotypes of a backcross line and ‘Ohsuzu’ were constructed using 159 DNA markers, 126 of which had been designed by Sayama et al. (2011) and 33 of which were newly designed to cover all the 20 chromosomes in addition to the markers near the Rsv3 locus (Supplemental Tables 1, 2). Rsv3 alleles of the BC2F2:3 lines were identified by analysis of the marker alleles of M3SattM.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic illustration of soybean chromosome 14 near the Rsv3 gene. The Rsv3 gene was reported to be located in the region between two markers, A519F/R and M3SattM (a double-headed arrow), by Suh et al. (2011). Another five markers, BARCSOYSSR_14_1403, 1408, 1410, 1414, and 1416 (Song et al. 2010), are indicated as B1403, B1408, B1410, B1414, and B1416, respectively.

Development of backcross lines

Backcross lines were developed from a cross between ‘Ohsuzu’ (susceptible to SMV strains C and D) as a recurrent parent and ‘Fukuibuki’ (resistant to SMV strains C and D) as a donor of the resistance allele of Rsv3 (Supplemental Fig. 1). ‘Ohsuzu’ and ‘Fukuibuki’ were crossed in 2001, and backcrosses to ‘Ohsuzu’ were repeated five times from 2002 to 2006. Following each backcross, DNA markers near the Rsv3 locus, namely Satt726 and M3SattM, were genotyped, and heterozygous plants were selected as pollen parents (Fig. 1). BC5F1 plants were grown in 2007, and then, plants homozygous for the ‘Fukuibuki’ allele were selected from a BC5F2 population in 2008 based on the alleles of DNA markers Satt726, BARCSOYSSR_14_1403, and M3SattM (Fig. 1).

Soybean mosaic virus artificial inoculation tests

Artificial inoculation tests with SMV were performed according to the method of Nagasawa et al. (1987) in a net house in a nursery. The breeding lines ‘Karikei 814’ and ‘Tohoku 169’ (‘Karikei 813’) were inoculated in 2011 and/or 2012, and the BC2F2:3 lines were inoculated in 2006. The SMV strains used in this study were originally isolated by Takahashi et al. (1987). SMV strains C and D correspond to SV-15 (MAFF 104065) (MAFF, microorganism accession number of National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences Genebank) and SV-70 (MAFF 104066), respectively. To obtain sufficient viruses to inoculate all lines and cultivars and to repopulate viruses, susceptible cultivar ‘Norin 4’ was inoculated. Frozen (−80°C) SMV-infected leaves were homogenized in phosphate buffer solution (40 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate, 60 mM disodium hydrogen phosphate, pH 7.0) to prepare the inoculum. Carborundum of 600 mesh was dusted on the leaves of ‘Norin 4’ before inoculation, and the inoculum was subsequently applied by rubbing the leaves of each plant with a sponge. Unifoliate leaves of 5–12 plants of each tested line or each cultivar were inoculated with strains C and D independently, and the resistance of each tested line or cultivar was evaluated by visually inspecting the symptoms of the first or second trifoliate leaves 1 or 2 weeks after inoculation. In 2006, the resistances of BC2F2:3 lines were assessed by dot immuno-binding assay (DIBA), according to Hibi and Saito (1985) and visual inspection. Polyclonal antibodies against SMV were provided by Dr. Seiji Kanematsu (NARO).

Yield trials and evaluation of agricultural characteristics

‘Tohoku 169,’ which carries the ‘Harosoy’ allele of Rsv3 in an ‘Ohsuzu’ background, and ‘Ohsuzu’ were subjected to yield trials in a rotational paddy field and upland field from 2012 to 2014. Plots at each location were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications. In all trials, the seeds of each tested line or cultivar were sown at four seeds per hill, and seedlings were thinned to leave two plants per hill. Other growth conditions are shown in Supplemental Table 3.

We evaluated the following 11 agricultural characteristics according to the test guidelines of agricultural characteristics for the plant variety protection and seed acts of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan (http://www.hinsyu.maff.go.jp/info/sinsakijun/botanical_taxon.html): flowering time, seed-filling period, maturity, main stem length, lodging, number of pods, number of seeds per pod, seed yield, 100-seed weight, protein content, and oil content. Flowering time, maturity, and seed-filling period were defined as the number of days from sowing to flowering, from sowing to maturation, and from flowering to maturity, respectively. Lodging was visually scored from 0 (erect) to 5 (completely lodged). For evaluating the main stem length and number of pods, 10 hills (20 plants) of each plot were randomly selected and measured. The number of seeds per pod was investigated according to Kato et al. (2014) using five randomly selected plants in 10 hills. Seed yield was calculated by dividing the seed mass by the number of hills harvested in each plot. Measurement of 100-seed weight, protein content, and oil content were evaluated according to the method of Kato et al. (2014).

Statistical analyses were performed with the statistical package R 2.12.2 (http://www.r-project.org/). The statistical significance of differences was evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA). A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Genotyping of DNA markers near Rsv3 in ‘Ohsuzu,’ ‘Fukuibuki’ and its ancestors

The DNA markers located near the Rsv3 locus in ‘Ohsuzu,’ ‘Fukuibuki,’ and ancestors of ‘Fukuibuki,’ namely ‘Harosoy,’ ‘Nemashirazu,’ ‘Tairadatezairai,’ and ‘Dewamusume,’ were genotyped (Table 1, Supplemental Fig. 1). The sizes of PCR products of all tested markers in ‘Dewamusume’ were identical to those of ‘Harosoy.’ The sizes of all the markers in ‘Fukuibuki’ were also identical to those of ‘Harosoy,’ with the exception of Satt560 (Table 1). In contrast, the sizes of PCR products of all markers in ‘Nemashirazu’ and ‘Tairadatezairai’ were completely different from those of ‘Harosoy’ (Table 1). Based on the alleles of ‘Dewamusume’ and ‘Fukuibuki’ at BARCSOYSSR_14_1410, 1414, 1416 and M3SattM, which cover the genomic region of the Rsv3 locus, the Rsv3 allele of these cultivars was inferred to be derived from ‘Harosoy’ (Fig. 1, Table 1).

Table 1.

The sizes of PCR products of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers near Rsv3 in eight tested cultivars or lines and their resistance to soybean mosaic virus (SMV) strains C and D

Variety Sizes of SSR markers near Rsv3 (bp) Resistancea

Satt726 B1403b B1408b B1410b B1414b B1416b M3SattM Satt560
Harosoy 278 128 262 93 160 158 224 289 R R
Nemashirazu 309 107 284 138 151 156 230 292 S S
Tairadatezairai 306 140 338 132 163 NDc 230 292 S S
Ohsuzu 305 150 330 130 193 NDc 230 298 S S

Dewamusume HAc HA HA HA HA HA HA HA R R
Fukuibuki HA HA HA HA HA HA HA NE/TAd R R
Tohoku 169 HA HA HA HA HA HA HA NE/TA
Karikei 814 HA HA HA HA HA HA HA NE/TA
a

“R” and “S” indicate resistance and susceptiblity, respectively, to SMV, following Ishikawa et al. (1979), Shimada et al. (2004), Tabuchi et al. (1999) and Takahashi et al. (1987).

b

B1403, B1408, B1410, B1414, and B1416 indicate BARCSOYSSR_14_1403, 1408, 1410, 1414, and 1416, respectively (Song et al. 2010).

c

Marker alleles derived from ‘Harosoy.’

d

Marker alleles derived from ‘Nemashirazu’ or ‘Tairadatezairai.’

Introduction of Rsv3 into ‘Ohsuzu’ by backcrossing

‘Ohsuzu’ and ‘Fukuibuki’ were crossed in 2001, and five backcrosses to ‘Ohsuzu’ were made from 2002 through 2006. Six BC5F1 plants carrying heterozygous alleles in a genomic region containing Rsv3 were grown in 2007 and 218 plants homozygous for the ‘Harosoy’ allele of Rsv3 were selected from a BC5F2 population consisting of 891 plants by genotyping of DNA markers Satt726, BARCSOYSSR_14_1403, and M3SattM in 2008. Of these 218 plants, 59 BC5F2 plants were selected again by the evaluation of seed qualities, and 59 BC5F3 lines were grown in 2009. Two elite breeding lines were selected from these 59 lines and named ‘Karikei 813’ and ‘Karikei 814.’ From the results of the preliminary yield trials for these two elite lines in 2010 and 2011, ‘Karikei 813’ was selected and renamed ‘Tohoku 169.’ In addition, the alleles in the genomic regions containing Rsv3 in ‘Tohoku 169’ (Karikei 813) and ‘Karikei 814’ were determined, confirming that alleles of all the SSR markers of these lines, except Satt560, matched the alleles of ‘Harosoy’ (Table 1). Additionally, BC2F1 plants were grown in 2004, and six BC2F2 plants homozygous for the ‘Harosoy’ allele of Rsv3 and four BC2F2 plants homozygous for the ‘Ohsuzu’ allele of Rsv3 were selected from a BC2F2 population using the DNA marker M3SattM, and the seeds of each BC2F3 line were collected.

Artificial inoculation tests of SMV

Artificial inoculation tests of the BC2F2:3 lines, which were developed for introducing the ‘Harosoy’ allele of Rsv3 into ‘Ohsuzu,’ were conducted in 2006. The results of inoculation tests using the differential varieties corresponded to the results of previous studies, although only half of the tested plants of ‘Norin 4’ showed symptoms with strain D (Table 2) (Hashimoto and Nagasawa 1987, Ishikawa et al. 1979, Takahashi et al. 1987). BC2F2:3 lines carrying the ‘Harosoy’ alleles of Rsv3 showed no symptoms, whereas BC2F2:3 lines carrying the ‘Ohsuzu’ alleles of Rsv3 showed mosaic symptoms on leaves with both strains C and D (Table 2). Also, SMV was detected by DIBA in the leaves of inoculated BC2F2:3 lines carrying the ‘Ohsuzu’ alleles of Rsv3, immunologically verifying the visual assessment.

Table 2.

Artificial inoculation tests with soybean mosaic virus (SMV) strains C and D

Variety SMV-C SMV-D


2006 2011 2012 Resistanced 2006 2011 2012 Resistanced
Differential varieties
 Peking 0/11b 0/10 0/10 R 0/11 0/10 0/10 R
 Harosoy 0/8 0/10 0/10 R 0/10 0/10 0/10 R
 Ouu 3 10/11 10/10 10/10 S 11/11 10/10 10/10 S
 Tokachinagaha 10/10 10/10 10/10 S 7/8 10/10 10/10 S
 Nemashirazu 12/12 10/10 10/10 S 9/12 10/10 10/10 S
 Fukusennari 6/12 10/10 4/10 S 0/10 0/10 0/10 R
 Norin 4 11/12 10/10 10/10 S 5/11 10/10 10/10 S
 Tsurunotamago 1 5/6 10/10 9/9 S 5/5 10/10 10/10 S
 Shiromame 0/11 0/10 0/10 R 8/12 10/10 6/9 S
 Dewamusume 0/11 0/10 0/10 R 0/12 0/10 0/10 R

Tested linesa
 BC2F3-49 (OH) 8(12)/12c S 11(11)/11 S
 BC2F3-56 (OH) 8(12)/12 S 11(11)/12 S
 BC2F3-57 (OH) 8(9)/12 S 12(11)/12 S
 BC2F3-71 (OH) 9(10)/11 S 9(7)/10 S
 BC2F3-43 (HA) 0(0)/12 R 0(0)/12 R
 BC2F3-50 (HA) 0(0)/12 R 0(0)/12 R
 BC2F3-54 (HA) 0(0)/12 R 0(0)/12 R
 BC2F3-67 (HA) 0(0)/12 R 0(0)/12 R
 BC2F3-68 (HA) 0(0)/12 R 0(0)/12 R
 BC2F3-69 (HA) 0(0)/12 R 0(0)/12 R
 Tohoku 169 0/10 0/10 R 0/10 0/10 R
 Karikei 814 0/10 R 0/10 R
a

(OH) indicates that the allele of an SSR marker near Rsv3, M3SattM, was the ‘Ohsuzu’ type, and (HA) indicates that the allele of M3SattM was the ‘Harosoy’ type.

b

The number of infected plants judged by visual inspection/the number of all tested plants.

c

The number of infected plants judged by visual inspection (judged by dot immuno-binding assay)/the number of all tested plants.

d

R and S indicate resistance and susceptiblity, respectively, to SMV.

Artificial inoculation tests of ‘Tohoku 169’ and ‘Karikei 814’ were performed in 2011 and 2012. The results of inoculation tests using the differential varieties matched those of the tests in 2006, although only approximately half of the plants of ‘Fukusennari’ showed symptoms with strain C in 2012 (Table 2). ‘Tohoku 169’ and ‘Karikei 814’ showed no symptoms on leaves with strains C and D (Table 2).

Graphical genotyping

The sizes of 159 SSR markers were compared between ‘Ohsuzu’ and ‘Fukuibuki,’ and 97 codominant markers as well as seven markers near the Rsv3 locus were selected as markers for the graphical genotyping of ‘Tohoku 169’ (Supplemental Tables 1, 2, Fig. 2). Among the 97 markers, the alleles of 93 markers in ‘Tohoku 169’ matched those in ‘Ohsuzu’ and those of four markers and the markers near the Rsv3 locus matched those of ‘Fukuibuki’ (Fig. 2). The four markers showing polymorphism between ‘Tohoku 169’ and ‘Ohsuzu’ were Satt318, Sat_424, and BARCSOYSSR_14_1427 on chromosome 14, which covers the genomic region containing Rsv3, and GMES5027 on chromosome 16. The alleles of the eight markers near the Rsv3 locus completely matched those of ‘Fukuibuki’ (Table 1, Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Graphical genotype of ‘Tohoku 169.’ Each horizontal line on a chromosome indicates the position of a tested DNA marker on the physical map based on the soybean genome database Wm82.a1 (Schmutz et al. 2010). Areas with the white background show alleles derived from the recurrent parent, ‘Ohsuzu,’ and areas with the gray background show alleles derived from the Rsv3 donor parent ‘Fukuibuki.’ A double-headed arrow shows the map location of Rsv3 between BARCSOYSSR1410 and M3SattM reported by Suh et al. (2011).

Yield trial

To compare the agricultural characteristics of ‘Ohsuzu’ and ‘Tohoku 169,’ ‘Ohsuzu’ and ‘Tohoku 169’ were subjected to yield trials in rotational paddy and upland fields from 2012 to 2014. Although there were significant differences in flowering time and main stem length between ‘Ohsuzu’ and ‘Tohoku 169’ (factor “variety” in ANOVA), differences in other characteristics such as maturity and 100-seed weight were not significant (Table 3).

Table 3.

Agronomic characteristics of ‘Ohsuzu’ and ‘Tohoku 169’ by yield trials

Filed condition Year Variety Flowering timea (day) Seed-filling perioda (day) Maturitya (day) Main stem length (cm) Lodgingb Number of podsc Number of seeds per pod Seed yield (kg/a) 100-seed weight (g) Protein content (%) Oil content (%)
Upland field 2012 Ohsuzu 59.7 74.0 133.7 61.2 0.0 89.5 1.99 27.3 28.1 40.8 22.2
Tohoku 169 62.7 71.7 134.3 67.1 0.0 97.0 1.99 33.2 29.6 40.5 22.7

2013 Ohsuzu 56.7 74.3 131.0 57.3 1.0 89.9 1.94 31.2 34.5 42.7 21.4
Tohoku 169 58.7 72.0 130.7 63.0 1.0 94.4 1.97 30.4 33.4 42.2 21.3

2014 Ohsuzu 56.0 73.7 129.7 67.9 2.3 76.6 2.01 30.7 37.6 43.1 20.9
Tohoku 169 58.0 71.3 129.3 70.6 2.3 72.9 2.03 28.3 37.7 43.4 20.5

Rotational paddy field 2012 Ohsuzu 59.0 70.0 129.0 62.7 1.0 102.9 2.05 48.7 35.7 43.5 21.7
Tohoku 169 61.0 69.0 130.0 68.4 1.7 108.4 2.08 47.5 34.1 43.2 21.7

2013 Ohsuzu 49.7 72.3 122.0 61.4 1.3 98.8 2.02 41.4 35.4 43.3 20.9
Tohoku 169 53.3 71.7 125.0 72.8 2.3 109.2 2.03 42.2 35.9 42.7 21.1

2014 Ohsuzu 52.3 76.0 128.3 69.9 1.3 76.9 2.03 38.9 39.8 46.2 19.2
Tohoku 169 54.3 76.7 131.0 76.4 2.0 78.6 2.09 36.6 39.1 44.9 19.6

ANOVA Field *** ns *** *** * ** ** *** *** *** ***
Year *** * *** *** *** *** * ** *** *** ***
Variety *** ns ns *** ns ns ns ns ns ns ns
Field × Year *** ** ** ns *** ns ns * * ** *
Field × Variety ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns
Year × Variety ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns
Field × Year × Variety ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns
a

Flowering time, maturity, and seed-filling period are defined as the number of days from sowing to flowering, from sowing to maturation, and from flowering to maturity, respectively.

b

Lodging was visually scored from 0 (no lodging) to 5 (completely lodged).

c

The number of pods was calculated as the total from two plants per hill.

Similarly, there were significant differences in all characteristics, except for seed-filling period, between the rotational paddy and upland fields (factor “field”) and there were significant differences in all the characteristics between cultivation years (factor “year”) (Table 3). These results showed that field and year affected almost all characteristics, whereas variety affected only flowering time and main stem length. The effects of interaction between field and year were significant for all characteristics, except for main stem length, number of pods, and number of seeds per pod (Table 3). In contrast, there was no significant effect of the interactions between field and variety or year and variety or of the interaction between all three factors (Table 3). These results indicated that the differences between ‘Tohoku 169’ and ‘Ohsuzu’ were consistent over different cultivation conditions and that the differences between the two cultivars with respect to agricultural characteristics were relatively small despite differences in cultivation conditions across years and fields.

Discussion

The cultivar ‘Harosoy’ was introduced into the soybean breeding program in Japan as the source of resistance to SMV strains C and D. Gunduz et al. (2001) showed that ‘Harosoy’ carries a resistance allele at the Rsv3 locus and susceptibility alleles at the Rsv1 and Rsv4 loci. Considering these facts, Rsv3 derived from ‘Harosoy’ has been suggested to confer resistance to SMV strains C and D. To determine whether resistant Japanese cultivars carry the genomic region containing Rsv3 derived from ‘Harosoy,’ we compared the alleles of DNA markers located near Rsv3 in resistant and susceptible cultivars. Resistant cultivars and ‘Harosoy’ carried the same alleles in the region containing Rsv3, whereas susceptible cultivars carried alleles that differed from the ‘Harosoy’ allele. These results indicate that Rsv3 derived from ‘Harosoy’ has been used as a gene for resistance to SMV strains C and D.

Lines and individual plants resistant to SMV strains C and D have been selected from a population by growing plants in fields severely infected with strains C and D or by inoculating plants with SMV using air-pressure guns (Hashimoto et al. 1984, Hashimoto and Nagasawa 1987, Ishikawa et al. 1979, Takahashi et al. 2003). However, temperature affects the severity of symptoms induced by SMV, impeding the selection of resistant plants (Shigemori 1991). It is difficult to inoculate all tested plants uniformly and to distinguish resistant and susceptible plants after inoculation without error. Takahashi et al. (2003), evaluating the efficiency of artificial air-gun inoculation tests, showed that 3% of tested susceptible plants escaped selection by artificial inoculation, depending on the cultivation environment. In the present study, artificial inoculation was performed in a net house, and some inoculated plants of susceptible varieties or lines showed no symptoms. This finding shows that evaluation by artificial spray inoculation in a net house or in the field is not perfect. We used marker-assisted selection with DNA markers near Rsv3 in backcross breeding to introduce a gene for resistance to strains C and D into the leading variety ‘Ohsuzu’ and developed ‘Tohoku 169’ and ‘Karikei 814.’ Our results showed that the DNA markers of Rsv3 can be used more accurately than evaluation by artificial inoculation to select plants with resistance to SMV strains C and D.

In introducing a resistance gene into breeding materials, the resistance gene itself should not cause undesirable changes in other agricultural characteristics. If the resistance is linked to undesirable agricultural characteristics, breeders have to break the linkages between the resistance gene and undesirable genes. One example is the ‘Peking’ allele of the Rhg4 gene, one of the major resistance genes to soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines) (Matson and Williams 1965). Rhg4 is closely linked (0.35 cM) to the I locus, which controls seed coat color, and ‘Peking’ had a black seed coat (Matson and Williams 1965). When Rhg4 from ‘Peking’ was introduced, the seed coats of the recipient lines also became black, an undesirable characteristic. The use of Rhg4 derived from ‘Peking’ has been limited for this reason. Another example is rice pi21, a gene for durable resistance to rice blast (Magnaporthe oryzae) (Fukuoka et al. 2009). The location of the pi21 gene is near that of a gene that degrades eating quality. The eating quality of lines carrying pi21 in the elite cultivar background was equivalent to that of the elite cultivar only when a donor fragment did not contain the neighboring gene. To test the effects of fragments containing Rsv3 genes on agricultural characteristics, we performed yield trials for three years and compared ‘Ohsuzu’ and ‘Tohoku 169,’ which carried donor fragments in the ‘Ohsuzu’ background. We found that donor fragments affected only flowering time and main stem length and did not affect other characteristics, including maturity and seed weight, and that seed yields of ‘Tohoku 169’ were equivalent to those of ‘Ohsuzu.’ It has been reported that late flowering elongates main stem length (Cober and Morrison 2010, Yamada et al. 2012), suggesting that the difference between these cultivars in main stem length is due to differences in flowering time. From the comparison of graphical genotypes between ‘Ohsuzu’ and ‘Tohoku 169,’ regions on chromosome 14 and 16 of ‘Tohoku 169’ originated in the Rsv3 donor, ‘Fukuibuki.’ We could not determine whether the introduced genomic region containing Rsv3 affected the duration from sowing to flowering, although major candidate genes and QTLs controlling flowering previously identified as E1, E2, E3, E4, E7, and E8 are not located on chromosomes 14 or 16 (Watanabe et al. 2012). Although changes in flowering time and main stem length have been reported to affect maturity and lodging, respectively (Wilcox and Sediyama 1981, Yamada et al. 2012), there were no significant differences in maturity or lodging between ‘Ohsuzu’ and ‘Tohoku 169.’ Thus, we showed that differences between ‘Ohsuzu’ and ‘Tohoku 169’ in agricultural characteristics were negligible and/or not significant. These results suggest that Rsv3 itself does not have undesirable pleiotropic effects on other agricultural characteristics and that Rsv3 is not linked to undesirable genes.

‘Ohsuzu’ has high adaptability in all parts of the Tohoku region, Hokuriku region, and northern parts of the Kanto region (Tabuchi et al. 1999); therefore, ‘Tohoku 169’ is expected to have equivalent adaptability. In these areas, ‘Ohsuzu,’ ‘Ryuho,’ (Nakamura et al. 1996) and ‘Tanrei’ (Mikoshiba et al. 1983) have been cultivated as early maturation varieties, but these varieties are susceptible to SMV strains C and D (Shigemori 1991). With the aim of displacing these varieties, we have been performing yield trial tests and evaluating the adaptability of ‘Tohoku 169’ in these areas for registration as a new cultivar.

Supplementary Material

66_319_1.pdf (1MB, pdf)
66_319_2.pdf (1MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Seiji Kanematsu (NARO) for providing a polyclonal antibody against SMV, Dr. Junichi Sakai (NARO) for teaching us the experimental technique of DIBA and Hitoshi Sato, Osamu Fujii, Yuko Sato, Akihiro Takahashi, Kosei Awatsu, Hisaho Takagai, and Kenei Takahashi (NARO) for the field management of yield trials. This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan [Genomics for Agricultural Innovation (DD-3220) and Development of mitigation and adaptation techniques to global warming in the sectors of agriculture, forestry and fisheries (1002)].

Literature Cited

  1. Beatty, K.D., Eldridge, I.L. and Simpson, A.M.Jr. (1982) Soybean response to different planting patterns and dates. Agron. J. 74: 859–862. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cho, E.K. and Goodman, R.M. (1979) Strains of soybean mosaic virus: Classification based on virulence in resistant soybean cultivars. Phytopathology 69: 467–470. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cober, E.R. and Morrison, M.J. (2010) Regulation of seed yield and agronomic characters by photoperiod sensitivity and growth habit genes in soybean. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120: 1005–1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fukuoka, S., Saka, N., Koga, H., Ono, K., Shimizu, T., Ebana, K., Nagao, H., Takahashi, A., Hirochika, H., Okuno, K.et al. (2009) Loss of function of a proline-containing protein confers durable disease resistance in rice. Science 325: 998–1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gore, M.A., Hayes, A.J., Jeong, S.C., Yue, Y.G., Buss, G.R. and Saghai Maroof, M.A. (2002) Mapping tightly linked genes controlling potyvirus infection at the Rsv1 and Rpv1 region in soybean. Genome 45: 592–599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gunduz, I., Buss, G.R., Ma, G., Chen, P. and Tolin, S.A. (2001) Genetic analysis of resistance to soybean mosaic virus in OX670 and Harosoy soybean. Crop Sci. 41: 1785–1791. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gunduz, I., Buss, G.R., Chen, P. and Tolin, S.A. (2004) Genetic and phenotypic analysis of soybean mosaic virus resistance in PI 88788 soybean. Phytopathology 94: 687–692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hashimoto, K., Nagasawa, T., Kokubun, K., Murakami, S., Koyama, T., Nakamura, S., Matsumoto, S., Matsumoto, S. and Kouichi, S. (1984) A new soybean variety ‘Suzuyutaka’. Bull. Tohoku Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn. 70: 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hashimoto, K. and Nagasawa, T. (1986) Breeding for virus resistance in soybean in Tohoku national experiment station. Misc. Publ. Tohoku Natl. Exp. Stn. 5: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hashimoto, K. and Nagasawa, T. (1987) Breeding for the resitance to virus, In: Kojima, M. (eds.) Legume breeding in Japan. Meibun Shobou, Tokyo, pp. 32–64. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hayes, A.J., Ma, G., Buss, G.R. and Saghai Maroof, M.A. (2000) Molecular marker mapping of Rsv4, a gene conferring resistance to all known strains of soybean mosaic virus. Crop Sci. 40: 1434–1437. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hayes, A.J. and Saghai Maroof, M.A. (2000) Targeted resistance gene mapping in soybean using modified AFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100: 1279–1283. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hayes, A.J., Jeong, S.C., Gore, M.A., Yu, Y.G., Buss, G.R., Tolin, S.A. and Saghai Maroof, M.A. (2004) Recombination within a nucleotide-binding-site/leucine-rich-repeat gene cluster produces new variants conditioning resistance to soybean mosaic virus in soybeans. Genetics 166: 493–503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hibi, T. and Saito, Y. (1985) A dot immunobinding assay for the detection of tobacco mosaic virus in infected tissues. J. Gen. Virol. 66: 1191–1194. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ishida, K. and Tange, M. (1984) Studies on relation of quantitative characters with yields and weights of grain in a black bean, Tanba-kuro-daizu. 1: Effects of seeding times on quantitative characters, yields and weight of grain in a black beans. Sci. Rept. Fac. Agr. Kobe Univ. 16: 89–93. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ishikawa, M., Matsumoto, S., Nagasawa, T., Hashimoto, K., Koyama, T., Kokubun, K., Murakami, S., Nakamura, S., Miyahara, T., Matsumoto, S.et al. (1979) A new soybean variety ‘Dewamusume’. Bull. Tohoku Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn. 59: 71–86. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jeong, S.C. and Saghai Maroof, M.A. (2004) Detection and genotyping of SNPs tightly linked to two disease resistance loci, Rsv1 and Rsv3, of soybean. Plant Breed. 123: 305–310. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kanematsu, S. and Nakano, M. (2015) Comparison between Japanese and US strain of soybean mosaic virus using differential soybean cultivars. Bull. Tohoku Agric. Res. Cent. 117: 59–62. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kato, S., Sayama, T., Fujii, K., Yumoto, S., Kono, Y., Hwang, T.Y., Kikuchi, A., Takada, Y., Tanaka, Y., Shiraiwa, T.et al. (2014) A major and stable QTL associated with seed weight in soybean across multiple environments and genetic backgrounds. Theor. Appl. Genet. 127: 1365–1374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Koshimizu, Y. and Iizuka, N. (1963) Studies on soybean virus disease in Japan. Bull. Tohoku Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn. 27: 1–103. [Google Scholar]
  21. Matson, A.L. and Williams, L.F. (1965) Evidence of a fourth gene for resistance to the soybean cyst nematode. Crop Sci. 1965: 477. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mikoshiba, K., Matsuzawa, H., Ogiwara, H. and Shigemori, I. (1983) A new soybean cultivar ‘Tanrei’ and its characteristics. Bull. Nagano Chusin Agr. Ex. Sta. 2: 8–19. [Google Scholar]
  23. Moon, J.K., Jeong, S.C., Van, K., Saghai Maroof, M.A. and Lee, S.H. (2009) Marker-assisted identification of resistance genes to soybean mosaic virus in soybean lines. Euphytica 169: 375–385. [Google Scholar]
  24. Nagasawa, T., Takahashi, K., Hashimoto, K., Murakami, S. and Watanabe, I. (1987) Evaluation of soybean genetic resources on the resistance to the strain of soybean mosaic virus. Tohoku J. Crop Sci. 30: 67–68. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nakamura, S., Yumoto, S., Takahashi, K., Tabuchi, K., Adachi, T., Kikuchi, A., Kowata, M., Banba, H., Takahashi, N., Okabe, A.et al. (1996) Bull. Tohoku Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn. 91: 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nakano, M., Iwasaki, M. and Shinkai, A. (1982) Further study on strains of soybean mosaic virus in Kyushu. Proc. Assoc. Pl. Prot. Kyushu 28: 24–25. [Google Scholar]
  27. Saghai Maroof, M.A., Tucker, D.M., Skoneczka, J.A., Bowman, B.C., Tripathy, S. and Tolin, S.A. (2010) Fine mapping and candidate gene discovery of the soybean mosaic virus resistance gene, Rsv4. Plant Genome 3: 14–22. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sayama, T., Hwang, T.Y., Komatsu, K., Takada, Y., Takahashi, M., Kato, S., Sasama, H., Higashi, A., Nakamoto, Y., Funatsuki, H.et al. (2011) Development and application of a whole-genome simple sequence repeat panel for high-throughput genotyping in soybean. DNA Res. 18: 107–115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schmutz, J., Cannon, S.B., Schlueter, J., Ma, J., Mitros, T., Nelson, W., Hyten, D.L., Song, Q., Thelen, J.J., Cheng, J.et al. (2010) Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 463: 178–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shi, A., Chen, P., Zheng, C., Hou, A. and Zhang, B. (2008) A PCR-based marker for the Rsv1 locus conferring resistance to soybean mosaic virus. Crop Sci. 48: 262–268. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shigemori, I. (1991) Studies on the breeding on soybeans for the resistance to soybean mosaic virus (SMV) Bull. Nagano Chushin Agr. Ex. Sta. 10: 1–61. [Google Scholar]
  32. Shimada, S., Takada, Y., Sakai, T., Kono, Y., Shimada, H., Takahashi, K., Adachi, T., Tabuchi, K., Kikuchi, A., Yumoto, S.et al. (2004) A new soybean cultivar, ‘Fukuibuki’, with high isoflavone content and resistance to soybean mosaic virus and soybean cyst nematode. Bull. Tohoku Agric. Res. Cent. 102: 41–56. [Google Scholar]
  33. Song, Q.J., Marek, L.F., Shoemaker, R.C., Lark, K.G., Concibido, V.C., Delannay, X., Specht, J.E. and Cregan, P.B. (2004) A new integrated genetic linkage map of the soybean. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 122–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Song, Q., Jia, G., Zhu, Y., Grant, D., Nelson, R.T., Hwang, E.Y., Hyten, D.L. and Cregan, P.B. (2010) Abundance of SSR motifs and development of candidate polymorphic SSR markers (BARCSOYSSR_1.0) in soybean. Crop Sci. 50: 1950–1960. [Google Scholar]
  35. Suh, S.J., Bowman, B.C., Jeong, N., Yang, K., Kastl, C., Tolin, S.A., Saghai Maroof, M.A. and Jeong, S.C. (2011) The Rsv3 locus conferring resistance to soybean mosaic virus is associated with a cluster of coiled-coil nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat genes. Plant Genome 4: 55–64. [Google Scholar]
  36. Tabuchi, K., Adachi, T., Shimada, H., Kikuchi, A., Takahashi, K., Takada, Y., Nakamura, S., Yumoto, S., Kowata, M. and Banba, K. (1999) A new soybean variety ‘Ohsuzu’. Bull. Tohoku Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn. 95: 13–26. [Google Scholar]
  37. Takahashi, K., Tanaka, T., Iida, W. and Tsuda, Y. (1980) Studies on virus diseases and casual viruses of soybean in Japan. Bull. Tohoku Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn. 62: 1–130. [Google Scholar]
  38. Takahashi, K., Nagasawa, T., Tanaka, T. and Iizuka, N. (1987) Reaction of soybean varieties to the strains of soybean mosaic virus and soybean stunt virus in Japan. Misc. Publ. Tohoku Natl. Exp. Stn. 7: 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  39. Takahashi, K. (2003) Breeding cultivars resistant to soybean mosaic virus in Tohoku district. In: Kaizuma, N., Kitamura K. and Sakai S. (eds.) Food legume science in Japan (Agricultural research series of the national agricultural research center No. 44), National Agricultural Research Center, Tsukuba, pp. 76–80. [Google Scholar]
  40. Watanabe, S., Harada, K. and Abe, J. (2012) Genetic and molecular bases of photoperiod responses of flowering in soybean. Breed. Sci. 61: 531–543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wilcox, J.R. and Sediyama, T. (1981) Interrelationships among height, lodging and yield in determinate and indeterminate soybeans. Euphytica 30: 323–326. [Google Scholar]
  42. Yagasaki, K., Takamatsu, M., Yamada, N., Tanaka, N. and Takahashi, N. (2000) Breeding of a new soybean variety ‘Ayakogane’. Hokuriku J. Crop Sci. 35: 50–52. [Google Scholar]
  43. Yamada, N., Sakamoto, H., Taniguchi, T., Takamatsu, M. and Yagasaki, K. (2006) Comparison of yield and other characteristics between soybean varieties and NILs with resistance to soybean mosaic virus C strain under infection with the pathogen. Hokuriku J. Crop Sci. 41: 89–91. [Google Scholar]
  44. Yamada, T., Hajika, M., Yamada, N., Hirata, K., Okabe, A., Oki, N., Takahashi, K., Seki, K., Okano, K., Fujita, Y.et al. (2012) Effects on flowering and seed yield of dominant alleles at maturity loci E2 and E3 in a Japanese cultivar, Enrei. Breed. Sci. 61: 653–660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

66_319_1.pdf (1MB, pdf)
66_319_2.pdf (1MB, pdf)

Articles from Breeding Science are provided here courtesy of Japanese Society of Breeding

RESOURCES