Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2016 Mar 1;2016:bcr2015214101. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-214101

A rare benign ovarian tumour

Marta Morna Palmeiro 1, Teresa Margarida Cunha 1, Ana Luisa Loureiro 1, Gonçalo Esteves 1
PMCID: PMC4785449  PMID: 26933186

Abstract

Sclerosing stromal tumour (SST) of the ovary is an extremely rare and benign ovarian neoplasm, accounting for 6% of the sex cord stromal ovarian tumours subtype. Usually, it is found during the second and third decades of life. Patients commonly present with pelvic pain, a palpable pelvic mass or menstrual irregularity. We report a case of a 20-year-old woman reporting of mild pelvic pain, with normal laboratory data. On imaging examinations, a large right adnexal tumour was found, with features suggesting an ovarian sex cord tumour. The patient underwent right salpingo-oophorectomy, diagnosing a SST of the ovary. This paper also reviews the literature, and emphasises the typical pathological and imaging characteristics of these rare benign ovarian lesions, and their impact, in a conservative surgery.

Background

Sclerosing stromal tumours (SSTs) of the ovary are rare benign neoplasms, corresponding to 6% of all sex cord stromal tumours.1 2 The majority of these neoplasms affect patients in the second and third decades of life.2

SSTs show unique pathological and radiological features that distinguish them from other ovarian stromal tumours.3 The presentation is unspecific in most patients and frequently related to an adnexal mass.4

These typical characteristics of SSTs are essential to enhance the benign nature of these neoplasms and to strength the possibility of a conservative surgery with fertility sparing.

Case presentation

A 20-year-old woman, recently married, presented to us with a 6-week history of intermittent mild pelvic pain. There was no relevant previous medical history.

On initial examination, the gynaecological evaluation was normal, but on digital rectal examination, an anterior and partially mobile mass was felt, bulging the anterior rectal wall.

The patient was initially investigated in an outpatient clinic with ultrasound, which detected a solid lesion with a long axis of 80 mm in the right adnexal region, but it was not possible to determinate if the origin was adnexal or exophytic uterine.

Investigations

Laboratory findings, including tumour markers, such as CA-125 and α-fetoprotein, and human chorionic gonadotropin, were normal.

A new gynaecological ultrasound was carried out with transabdominal and transvaginal evaluation, identifying a solid hypoechoic tumour with regular borders, measuring 78 mm of major axis, probably in the dependence of the right ovary (figure 1A). Colour Doppler examination revealed the presence of multiple vessels inside the lesion, more numerous at the periphery and extending to its central portion (figure 1B,C). The uterus and the left ovary were normal. A small amount of ascites was present.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Transabdominal ultrasound shows a solid hypoechoic tumour with regular borders, measuring 78×55×70 mm (159 cc), in the dependence of the right ovary. (B) Transabdominal and (C) transvaginal colour Doppler examination revealed the presence of multiple vessels inside the tumour, more numerous on the periphery and extending to the central portion. The uterus (*) and left ovary (arrow) were normal. A small amount of ascites was present.

To further characterise this lesion, MR was performed, revealing an ovoid solid tumour associated with the right ovary, with regular contours, measuring 80 mm of major axis. On T1-weighted images, this lesion was homogeneous, with low signal intensity (arrows) (figure 2A). On T2-weighted images, this mass was heterogeneous, with predominant areas of hypointensity and small areas with hyperintensity (figure 2B,C). On T1-weighted and T2-weighted images, the lesion revealed a thin, low-intensity rim surrounding the mass (figure 2A–C). Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrated an avid early enhancement with pseudolobular pattern, starting on the peripheral portion of the lesion (figure 3A, B). Over time, the lesion showed a progressive centripetal and prolonged enhancement, except in small-scattered areas of cyst and cleft (figure 3C, D). The lesion did not show restricted diffusion (figure 4). On the Adnex MR Scoring System, this lesion was classified with a score of 2, with features suggesting a sex cord stromal tumour type, most likely a SST. The uterus and the left ovary were normal. A small amount of pelvic ascites was found (figure 2B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

MRIs revealed an ovoid solid tumour associated with the right ovary, with regular contours, measuring 8 cm of major axis. (A) On axial T1-weighted MRIs, the tumour was homogeneous hypointense (arrows). On (B) sagittal and (C) axial T2-weighted MRIs, this mass was heterogeneous with predominant areas of hypointensity and small areas with hyperintensity (arrows). On both, T1-weighted and T2-weighted images, the lesion revealed a thin, low-intensity rim surrounding the mass. A small amount of pelvic ascites was found (*). The uterus and left ovary were normal.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Axial dynamic contrast-enhanced MRIs demonstrated avid early enhancement with pseudolobular pattern, starting on the peripheral portion of the lesion (A and B). Over time, the tumour showed a progressive centripetal and prolonged enhancement, except in small scattered areas of the cysts and clefts (C and D).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

On diffusion study, the lesion showed hypointensity on high b values (b=1000) (A), and hyperintensity on ADC map (B), demonstrating no restricted diffusion.

Differential diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of SSTs includes other sex cord stromal tumours including fibromas, thecomas, steroid cell tumours (lipid cell tumours), metastases and malignant epithelial ovarian tumours. Fibromas and thecomas usually show low signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging, and slow and prolonged enhancement on dynamic contrast MRI. Lipoid cell tumours commonly manifest as a small mass with hyperintense areas on T1-weighted images due to abundant intracellular lipid. Ovarian metastases and malignant epithelial tumours usually occur in older patients, and on dynamic enhanced MRI these lesions commonly show restricted diffusion and display more aggressive behaviour.

Treatment

The patient underwent right salpingo-oophorectomy with intraoperative consultation.

Outcome and follow-up

Macroscopic examination of the surgical specimen described the complete substitution of the right ovary by a capsulated tumour, with firm consistency, presenting yellowish nodular peripheral components and an oedematous central portion, with 76 mm of longest axis (figure 5). The right fallopian tube was normal.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Macroscopic examination of the surgical specimen described a capsulated tumour, with firm consistency, presenting yellowish nodular peripheral components and an oedematous central part, 76 mm on its largest dimension.

Microscopic examination revealed a pseudolobular pattern in which cellular nodules were separated by areas of densely collagenous or oedematous connective tissue that contained fewer cells (figure 6A). The cellular nodules were an admixture of collagen-producing spindle cells and lipid-containing round or ovoid cells without atypia and with prominent thin-walled vessels (figure 6B).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(A) Microscopic examination (H&E ×10) revealed a pseudolobular pattern in which cellular nodules were separated by areas of densely collagenous or oedematous connective tissue that contained fewer cells. (B) On microscopic examination (H&E ×40), the cellular nodules were an admixture of collagen-producing spindle cells and lipid-containing round or ovoid cells without atypia, and with prominent thin-walled vessels.

The ascitic fluid did not contain malignant cells.

The final pathological diagnosis was SST of the right ovary.

The patient recovered from surgery without complications and stayed asymptomatic after 10 months of follow-up.

Discussion

Eight percent of ovarian neoplasms are due to ovarian sex cord stromal tumours. These tumours are classified as granulosa stromal cell tumours, Sertoli's stromal tumours, steroid cell tumours (lipid cell tumours) and other types. Ovarian granulosa stromal cell tumours are subdivided as granulosa cell tumours, thecomas, fibromas and SSTs.3 5 SSTs represent only 6% of ovarian sex cord stromal tumours.1 2

SSTs are a particularly benign subtype of ovarian sex cord stromal tumour, described by Chalvardjian and Scully in 1973,6 with specific and individual pathological and radiological features that distinguish them from other stromal tumours.3

Around 80% of SSTs affect young women in the second and third decades of life, unlike the other types of stromal tumours, which are more common in the fifth and sixth decades.2 6

Usually, SSTs present as pelvic pain, menstrual irregularity and non-specific symptoms associated with the ovarian mass. Although these tumours are usually hormonally inactive, they may have oestrogenic and, infrequently, androgenic effects.4 7 They may, rarely, present with ascites.8

In the revised literature, the majority of SSTs were unilateral lesions, and all were benign.9

Histologically, SSTs were described by Chalvardjian and Scully as lesions with a characteristic pseudolobular pattern, constituted by heterogeneous cellular nodules composed of an admixture of collagen-producing spindle cells and lipid-containing round or ovoid cells, without atypia, showing intranodular collagenous sclerosis—‘sclerosing stromal tumour’. Oedematous and collagenous hypocellular areas and fibrosis are found between these cellular nodules. SSTs also demonstrate a typical exuberant vascularisation.1 3 10

On ultrasound, SSTs appear as large round masses, predominantly solid, with small central hypoechoic areas, in the affected adnexal region. Doppler evaluation shows numerous vessels, with peripheral predominance directing to the lesion's inner portion, assuming a ‘spoke-wheel’ aspect.5

On MRI, SSTs appear as large and well-circumscribed solid heterogeneous masses. On T2-weighted images, these tumours are heterogeneous, showing predominant isointense to hypointense solid components, and small hyperintense cystic areas. On T1-weighted images, they appear homogeneously hypointense. On T2-weighted and T1-weighted images, a thin hypointense peripheral line is seen, which represents the stretched ovarian cortex. On dynamic contrast-enhanced images, these masses demonstrate an early and avid peripheral enhancement with centripetal distribution over time, reflecting the peripheral rich cellularity and vascularity, and the inner collagenous hypocellularity typical of these lesions.3 8 11 12

Since SSTs of the ovary are rare benign tumours that occur mainly in young women, it is essential to be aware of their characteristic imaging features in order to perform a conservative surgery with fertility sparing.

Very few studies have been published about long-term follow-up and fertility outcomes of postsurgery SSTs. Those studies that are available emphasise the benign nature of these neoplasms, the impact on a fertility sparing surgery and the absence of reported SST recurrences.13–15

Learning points.

  • Sclerosing stromal tumours (SSTs) of the ovary are benign and extremely rare ovarian neoplasms.

  • The majority of SSTs occur in the second and third decades of life, with unspecific symptoms.

  • SSTs have distinctive histological features that reflect on characteristic imaging findings.

  • The familiarity with typical imaging presentation of SSTs allows the accurate preoperative diagnosis of these benign tumours and enables a less invasive surgery with fertility preservation.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr Joaninha Costa Rosa, an experienced pathologist at our institution, who contributed by performing the pathological diagnosis of this rare benign ovarian tumour.

Footnotes

Contributors: All the authors contributed to this case report. MMP carried out the bibliographic research and wrote the case report text. TMC was responsible for the patient examinations and revised the case report. All the authors chose and processed the case report images, and revised the case report. GE performed the pathological analysis and diagnosis of the tumour, and provided the corresponding histological images and subtitles.

Competing interests: None declared.

Patient consent: Obtained.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

  • 1.Matsubayashi R, Matsuo Y, Doi J et al. Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary: radiologic findings. Eur Radiol 1999;9:1335–8. 10.1007/s003300050844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kaygusuz EI, Cesur S, Cetiner H et al. Sclerosing stromal tumour in young women: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical spectrum. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:1932–5. 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6031.3373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kim JY, Jung KJ, Chung DS et al. Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary: MR-pathologic correlation in three cases. Korean J Radiol 2003;4:194–9. 10.3348/kjr.2003.4.3.194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Iravanloo G, Nozarian Z, Sarrafpour B et al. Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary. Arch Iranian Med 2008;11:561–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lee MS, Cho HC, Lee YH et al. Ovarian sclerosing stromal tumors: gray scale and color Doppler sonographic finding. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:413–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Khanna M, Khanna A, Manjari M. Sclerosing stromal tumor of ovary: a case report. Case Rep Pathol 2012;2012:592836 10.1155/2012/592836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Marwah N, Sankala M, Sansanwal P et al. Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary: a case report. Int J Healthc Biomed Res 2015;3:91–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jung SE, Rha SE, Lee JM et al. CT and MRI findings of sex cord-stromal tumor of the ovary. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:207–15. 10.2214/ajr.185.1.01850207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Akbulut M, Colakoglu N, Soysal ME et al. Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary: report of a case and review of the literature. Aegean Pathol J 2004;1:84–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Peng HH, Chang TC, Hsueh S. Sclerosing stromal tumor of ovary. Chang Gung Med J 2003;26:444–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jung SE, Lee JM, Rha SE et al. CT and MR imaging of ovarian tumors with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Radiographics 2002;22:1305–25. 10.1148/rg.226025033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Loureiro A, Cunha TM, Félix A. Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary. EURORAD 2013; case 10870. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Haroon S, Zia A, Idrees R et al. Clinicopathological spectrum of ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors; 20 years’ retrospective study in a developing country. J Ovarian Res 2013;6:87 10.1186/1757-2215-6-87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Grechi G, Clemente N, Tozzi A et al. Laparoscopic treatment of sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary in a woman with Gorlin-Goltz syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22:892–5. 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Abd A, Hafez E. Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary: a rare entity with distinctive features. Case Rep Clin Pathol 2014;1:5–7. [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES