To the Editor
We appreciate the interest of Rolland and Jardri in our paper (Fischer et al., 2014). The authors suggest that the circuitry we observed to be abnormal in patients with schizophrenia and cannabis use disorder, that we and others have noted to be involved in reward processing (Blum et al., 2000; Di Martino et al., 2008; Green, 2007) has also been implicated in “other functional (e.g., salience processing) and dysfunctional (e.g., psychosis)” processes. We agree, and as we noted in our paper, that the use of resting state functional connectivity “does not directly measure response to reward, and the brain regions implicated in the brain reward circuit are also involved in processes other than reward.” Potentially, future research correlating resting state functional connectivity of the implicated circuitry with analyses of task-based data would be helpful, although others have noted correspondence between resting state networks and task-based findings (Di Martino et al., 2008; Fox and Greicius, 2010; Whitfield-Gabrieli and Ford, 2011)
In their recent publication, Rolland and colleagues (Rolland et al., 2014) linked hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia to connectivity between the nucleus accumbens (NAc), ventral tegmental area (VTA), and a number of other regions generally consistent with what we referred to as the brain reward circuit. Moreover, they noted in their letter that the circuitry that we found to be affected by THC and smoked cannabis has also been implicated in psychosis in schizophrenia, and that cannabis smoking can increase positive symptoms in these patients. As indicated in our paper, however, we noted no global increase in positive or negative symptom severity on the PANSS after cannabis or THC. We recently conducted further analyses on our data, and we found no significant changes in any of the individual positive symptoms of the PANSS, or significant associations between individual positive symptoms and connectivity of reward circuitry, at the dose of THC and the amount of cannabis administered. In our paper, we did propose that the effects of cannabis on reward circuitry may be dose-dependent, and thus it is possible that higher doses of cannabis and THC might have worsened positive symptoms. However, while there are important methodological differences between our study and that of Rolland et al (2014), in our study the modest amount of cannabis smoked (1/2 of a 3.6% THC cigarette) and the relatively low dose of THC administered (15 mg THC pill) improved the functional connectivity between regions of the brain reward circuit, primarily observed between the bilateral NAc and regions of the prefrontal (i.e., ventral anterior cingulate) cortex, without worsening psychosis.
Acknowledgments
We thank NIDA (DA 026799) for providing funding for this research. We also thank Rolland and Jardri for their thoughtful comments.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Contributors
Dr. Fischer wrote the first draft of this response letter, and co-wrote the final version with Dr. Green. This letter has been reviewed and approved by all the co-authors.
Conflict of Interest
None
References
- Blum K, Braverman ER, Holder JM, Lubar JF, Monastra VJ, Miller D, Lubar JO, Chen TJ, Comings DE. Reward deficiency syndrome: a biogenetic model for the diagnosis and treatment of impulsive, addictive, and compulsive behaviors. Journal of psychoactive drugs. 2000;32(Suppl):i–iv. 1–112. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2000.10736099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Di Martino A, Scheres A, Margulies DS, Kelly AM, Uddin LQ, Shehzad Z, Biswal B, Walters JR, Castellanos FX, Milham MP. Functional connectivity of human striatum: a resting state FMRI study. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18(12):2735–2747. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischer AS, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Roth RM, Brunette MF, Green AI. Impaired functional connectivity of brain reward circuitry in patients with schizophrenia and cannabis use disorder: Effects of cannabis and THC. Schizophrenia research. 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.04.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fox MD, Greicius M. Clinical applications of resting state functional connectivity. Front Syst Neurosci. 2010;4:19. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green AI. Pharmacotherapy for schizophrenia and co-occurring substance use disorders. Neurotox Res. 2007;11(1):33–40. doi: 10.1007/BF03033480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rolland B, Amad A, Poulet E, Bordet R, Vignaud A, Bation R, Delmaire C, Thomas P, Cottencin O, Jardri R. Resting-State Functional Connectivity of the Nucleus Accumbens in Auditory and Visual Hallucinations in Schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2014 doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Ford J. Default mode network activity and connectivity in psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychology. 2011:8:18–18:21. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]