Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2016 Mar 10;4(2):e00110-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00110-16

Draft Genome Sequences of Two Thiomicrospira Strains Isolated from the Brine-Seawater Interface of Kebrit Deep in the Red Sea

Guishan Zhang a,b, Mohamed Fauzi Haroon a, Ruifu Zhang b, Tyas Hikmawan a, Ulrich Stingl a,
PMCID: PMC4786666  PMID: 26966216

Abstract

Two Thiomicrospira strains, WB1 and XS5, were isolated from the Kebrit Deep brine-seawater interface in the Red Sea, Saudi Arabia. Here, we present the draft genome sequences of these gammaproteobacteria, which both produce sulfuric acid from thiosulfate in culture.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The genus Thiomicrospira (Gammaproteobacteria, Thiotrichales, Piscirickettsiaceae) was first proposed by Kuenen and Veldkamp (1) to accommodate one marine bacterial species, Thiomicrospira pelophila. At the time of this writing, 11 Thiomicrospira species have validly been described, which have been isolated from seawater, intertidal mud flats, coastal sediments, deep-sea hydrothermal fumarole (2), and hypersaline lakes (3). Thiomicrospira is widespread in marine environments and plays an important role in the sulfur cycle (4). To date, 18 genome sequences of Thiomicrospira strains are available in NCBI GenBank.

Here, we present the genome sequences of Thiomicrospira sp. strains WB1 and XS5, which were isolated from the Kebrit Deep brine-seawater interface (24°44′N, 36°17′E) in the Red Sea at a depth of 1,465 m. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA genes indicated that strains WB1 and XS5 are most closely related to Thiomicrospira halophila (96.53%) and Thiomicrospira thermophila (97.28%), respectively.

Strains WB1 and XS5 were enriched and purified at 28°C using a sulfur-oxidizing-bacteria (SOB) medium, which includes the following ingredients: (NH4)2SO4 (1.0 g/liter), MgSO4·7H2O (1.0 g/liter), CaCl2·2H2O (0.3 g/liter), KCl (0.6 g/liter), and NaCl (15% [wt/vol]). After autoclaving, the medium was supplemented to contain 10 mM Na2S2O3, 0.5 g/liter K2HPO4 5 mM NH4Cl, 5 mM EDTA, and 10 mM NaHCO3. Bromothymol purple was added as pH indicator at a concentration of 4 mg/liter, and the final pH was adjusted to 7.5 to 8.0 with 1 M HCl and 1 M NaOH. Both strains are aerobic, Gram-negative, flagellated, and capable of growth at up to 20% (wt/vol NaCl) salinity.

Genomic DNA was extracted from the cultured cells using an alkaline lysis method (5) and subsequently sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. The raw reads were filtered and trimmed using PRINSEQ (version 0.20.4) (6). SOAPdenovo (version 1.05) (7, 8), with default parameters, was used to assemble the trimmed reads. The assemblies were manually checked and scaffolded based on read mapping. The genome completeness (100%) was assessed using CheckM (version 1.0.3) (9). Protein-coding open reading frames were predicted by Glimmer (version 3.02) (10). rRNAs were predicted by RNAmmer (version 1.2) (11), and tRNAs were predicted by tRNAscan-SE (version 1.21) (12).

The genome of WB1, as presented here, is composed of 6 contigs, with a total length of 2,279,450 bp (N50, 568,675 kbp) and a G+C content of 53.73%. It contains 2,072 protein-coding genes, 43 tRNAs, and 3 rRNAs. For strain XS5, the genome is composed of 23 contigs, with a total length of 2,633,068 bp (N50, 2,522,699 bp) and a G+C content of 50.12%. It contains 2,432 protein-coding genes, 45 tRNAs, and 6 rRNAs. Functional annotation by RAST (13) showed the presence of the gene for the osmolarity sensor protein EnvZ and genes related to thiosulfate and sulfur metabolism, supporting the high-salinity adaptation and observed sulfuric acid production during culturing.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers LQBN00000000 for WB1 and LQBO00000000 for XS5.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) baseline funding and the SEDCO Research Excellence Award to U.S.

Footnotes

Citation Zhang G, Fauzi Haroon M, Zhang R, Hikmawan T, Stingl U. 2016. Draft genome sequences of two Thiomicrospira strains isolated from the brine-seawater interface of Kebrit Deep in the Red Sea. Genome Announc 4(2):e00110-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00110-16.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Kuenen JG, Veldkamp H. 1972. Thiomicrospira pelophila, gen. nov., sp. nov., a new obligately chemolithotrophic colourless sulfur bacterium. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 38:241–256. doi: 10.1007/BF02328096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Takai K, Hirayama H, Nakagawa T, Suzuki Y, Nealson KH, Horikoshi K. 2004. Thiomicrospira thermophila sp. nov., a novel microaerobic, thermotolerant, sulfur-oxidizing chemolithomixotroph isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal fumarole in the Toto caldera, Mariana arc, western Pacific. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:2325–2333. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63284-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sorokin DY, Tourova TP, Kolganova TV, Spiridonova EM, Berg IA, Muyzer G. 2006. Thiomicrospira halophila sp. nov., a moderately halophilic, obligately chemolithoautotrophic, sulfur-oxidizing bacterium from hypersaline lakes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:2375–2380. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64445-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Knittel K, Kuever J, Meyerdierks A, Meinke R, Amann R, Brinkhoff T. 2005. Thiomicrospira arctica sp. nov. and Thiomicrospira psychrophila sp. nov., psychrophilic, obligately chemolithoautotrophic, sulfur-oxidizing bacteria isolated from marine Arctic sediments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:781–786. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63362-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Birnboim HC, Doly J. 1979. A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 7:1513–1523. doi: 10.1093/nar/7.6.1513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schmieder R, Edwards R. 2011. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 27:863–864. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li R, Li Y, Kristiansen K, Wang J. 2008. SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics 24:713–714. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li R, Zhu H, Ruan J, Qian W, Fang X, Shi Z, Li Y, Li S, Shan G, Kristiansen K, Li S, Yang H, Wang J, Wang J. 2010. De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Res 20:265–272. doi: 10.1101/gr.097261.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. 2007. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23:673–679. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T, Ussery DW. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.0955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The seed and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES