Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition logoLink to Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
. 2016 Feb 17;58(2):91–98. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.15-111

Redox signaling regulated by electrophiles and reactive sulfur species

Motohiro Nishida 1,2,3, Yoshito Kumagai 4, Hideshi Ihara 5, Shigemoto Fujii 6, Hozumi Motohashi 7, Takaaki Akaike 6,*
PMCID: PMC4788399  PMID: 27013774

Abstract

Redox signaling is a key modulator of oxidative stress induced by nonspecific insults of biological molecules generated by reactive oxygen species. Current redox biology is revisiting the traditional concept of oxidative stress, such that toxic effects of reactive oxygen species are protected by diverse antioxidant systems upregulated by oxidative stress responses that are physiologically mediated by redox-dependent cell signaling pathways. Redox signaling is thus precisely regulated by endogenous electrophilic substances that are generated from reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide and its derivative reactive species during stress responses. Among electrophiles formed endogenously, 8-nitroguanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (8-nitro-cGMP) has unique cell signaling functions, and pathways for its biosynthesis, signaling mechanism, and metabolism in cells have been clarified. Reactive sulfur species such as cysteine hydropersulfides that are abundant in cells are likely involved in 8-nitro-cGMP metabolism. These new aspects of redox biology may stimulate innovative and multidisciplinary research in cell and stem cell biology; infectious diseases, cancer, metabolic syndrome, ageing, and neurodegenerative diseases; and other oxidative stress-related disorders. This review focuses on the most recent progress in the biosynthesis, cell signaling, and metabolism of 8-nitro-cGMP, which is a likely target for drug development and lead to discovery of novel therapeutics for many diseases.

Keywords: electrophilic signaling, 8-nitro-cGMP, NO, redox signaling, ROS signaling

Introduction

The chemical biology of molecular oxygen and reactive oxygen species (ROS) is evolving as a frontier of research in energy metabolism, cell signaling, gene transcription, host defense, mutagenesis/carcinogenesis, and oxidative stress. Because of its oxygen-dependent redox properties, ROS can regulate physiological functions of various proteins, which may then modulate enzyme reactions involving cellular metabolism and genomic as well as epigenetic events including transcriptional regulation. Such redox-regulated protein effectors are mostly affected by both translational and posttranslational pathways. In addition to several new protein modifications identified so far, still unidentified redox-mediated protein modifications exist, which may lead to a paradigm-shifting concept of ROS and redox biology and even redox pathology known as oxidative stress.

ROS such as superoxide anion (O2•−) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) are reduced metabolites that are physiologically generated from molecular oxygen during mitochondrial respiration or antimicrobial defense responses of hosts during infection of cells and tissues. ROS are harmful agents that mediate oxygen toxicity and in fact are involved in the pathogenesis of many diseases associated with oxidative stress.(15) These oxidative stress-related diseases include infections; inflammations; cancer; lifestyle-related diseases and metabolic diseases such as arteriosclerosis and diabetes mellitus; and neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease.

Although expression of ROS-producing enzymes such as NADPH oxidase (Nox) and dual oxidase isoforms by various cell types causes general antimicrobial effects,(6,7) a better understanding of ROS biology now suggests that ROS such as H2O2 may have much more important physiological functions for cells and tissues, especially in the vasculature and in immune, epithelial, neuronal, and endocrine systems.(8,9) Another key molecule affecting ROS functions is nitric oxide (NO), which serves as a master cell signaling factor that functions in different cells and organs.(10) In view of current evidence of ROS signaling, the canonical mechanism of ROS toxicity has changed drastically and is now evolving.

The present review provides a brief overview of the signaling functions of ROS, with a particular focus on endogenous electrophiles derived from ROS and NO, which may indeed lead to a new concept and shift from conventional ROS toxicology. We also discuss unique antioxidant and nucleophilic properties of reactive cysteine persulfides for redox signal regulation. These reactive sulfur species (RSS), such as cysteine persulfides, are now being increasingly investigated in ROS and redox biology, which should result in the most innovative, well-integrated research on the chemical biology of these reactive small molecules.

Redox Signaling Mechanism

Electrophilic signal formation

ROS, which are simple, low-molecular-weight inorganic compounds, are formed physiologically as reduced metabolites of molecular oxygen. Because of their chemically reactive and thus mostly unstable nature in biological systems, ROS may need to be converted to other molecules to achieve biologically and physiologically relevant effects. The specificity of ROS signaling functions also depends on a spatiotemporal property of ROS generation that characterizes the molecular reaction environment. Therefore, identifying the secondary ROS mediators that specifically affects, as signal ligands, particular residues of sensor or effector proteins is extremely important (Fig. 1). The exact mechanisms of specific second messenger formation and its spatiotemporal signal regulation remained unknown, however, until we discovered a nitrated cyclic nucleotide, i.e., 8-nitroguanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (8-nitro-cGMP), as a unique electrophilic signal molecule, formed from NO and ROS.(11)

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

ROS signaling via formation of electrophilic second messengers. ROS produced from different sources, such as Nox in the cytoplasmic membrane or in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and mitochondria, are unstable primary signals. ROS themselves, or by means of their reaction with NO, react with various sensor molecules in cells and are converted to more stable electrophilic second messengers such as 8-nitro-cGMP.

We now understand the structures and functions and even localization and spatiotemporal dynamics of ROS-producing enzymes (e.g., Nox), the result being that the roles of these enzymes in ROS signaling in cells and tissues are clear.(6,7,12) We specifically clarified an ROS production mechanism that is mediated by cross-talk between Nox and mitochondria, which generates the electrophilic second messenger 8-nitro-cGMP in cells. This 8-nitro-cGMP signaling pathway may explain how ROS can transduce their cell signaling in a spatiotemporal manner (Fig. 1).(12) In fact, we identified a specific 8-nitro-cGMP signaling mechanism that affects sensor-effector molecules by means of an electrophile-mediated signaling system in cultured cells and in vivo,(13) as described later in this article.

Mechanism of redox sensing

As described above, ROS are unstable with very short half-lives in biological systems. In most ROS signaling processes, such an unstable primary ROS signal is initially transformed into a much more stable secondary messenger such as 8-nitro-cGMP (Fig. 1). During this process, biological molecules, which include nucleic acids, nucleotides, lipids, and reactive protein residues, act as chemical sensors and can effectively perceive ROS, so that they can participate in a wide range of ROS sensing reactions. For example, interaction of ROS and NO, in the presence of nucleotides and fatty acids, results in stable secondary signaling molecules such as 8-nitro-cGMP and nitro-fatty acids.(11,14) In addition, proteins expressing nucleophilic cysteine sulfhydryls as specific redox sensors readily react with ROS or electrophilic second messengers and thereby mediate receptor functions for ROS signaling. Identification of these sensor molecules is therefore essential for understanding the sensing specificity and selectivity of ROS ligands. We and others also extensively studied the structures and functions of sensor and effector proteins modified by an ROS signal or its secondary signaling molecules, with a focus on, for example, 8-nitro-cGMP (Fig. 2).(1121) Recent discoveries of such unique signal ligands and sensors will clarify the whole picture of diverse ROS sensing and signal transduction mechanisms.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Formation, signal transduction, and metabolism of 8-nitro-cGMP. PDE, phosphodiesterase; PKG, protein kinase G.

Effector function

Different effectors, as affected by ROS or secondary signaling molecules, are induced during the changes in structures of the proteins, which often serve simultaneously as sensors and effectors (Fig. 1 and 2). Phosphorylation and transcriptional signaling are regulated via redox-sensitive structural changes in sensor-effector proteins including protein kinases, phosphatases, and transcription factors, with these changes being mostly caused by chemical modifications, e.g., oxidation, nitrosylation, alkylation, and guanylation, of cysteine sulfhydryls by ROS and reactive nitrogen oxide species as well as electrophilic second messengers such as 8-nitro-cGMP.(3) Elucidating the sensor-effector relationship with ROS is of great importance in ROS research. In fact, novel mechanisms of ROS-dependent nuclear factor-κB activation,(22) S-nitrosylation-mediated regulation of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-Akt signaling,(23) and angiotensin type 1 receptor expression(24) were recently clarified in the context of such a redox sensor-effector relationship. Exploring redox-based signal regulation will promote greater understanding of cellular response mechanisms, e.g., cell proliferation and cell death, mediated by ROS signaling and involving phosphorylation signaling, transcriptional regulation, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and neuronal and vascular signal transduction (Fig. 1).

8-Nitro-cGMP as an Electrophilic Messenger for ROS and NO

8-Nitro-cGMP biosynthesis

We found in 2007 that the nitrated guanine nucleotide 8-nitro-cGMP forms in cells (Fig. 2) and plays a crucial role in ROS signaling via a unique posttranslational modification (PTM) of cysteine residues in proteins, with the PTM process being called protein S-guanylation.(11) We verified that peroxynitrite (ONOO), which is produced by cellular expression of both O2•− and NO, is the molecular species that is most likely responsible for nitration of guanine nucleotides and that nitrite plus H2O2 and myeloperoxidase may result in nitration of guanine nucleotides in a specific molecular environment in cells.(12,25) We extensively analyzed the cellular formation of 8-nitro-cGMP by using rat C6 glioma cells that produce O2•− and NO in response to stimulation with lipopolysaccharide plus proinflammatory cytokines via Nox2 and the inducible isoform of NO synthase (iNOS), respectively.(11,16) In these stimulated cells, we identified mitochondria-derived O2•− as a direct determinant of 8-nitro-cGMP formation. Mitochondria-derived O2•− production is itself regulated by H2O2 generated by Nox2 and plays a critical role in 8-nitro-cGMP formation, which suggests that an essential link exists between Nox2-dependent H2O2 production and mitochondrial O2•− production (Fig. 1). This finding may lend credence to our proposal that 8-nitro-cGMP may serve as a unique second messenger that forms downstream of NO and ROS generation. It is worth noting that 8-nitro-cGMP itself further augments mitochondria-derived O2•− production (Fig. 1).(26) S-Guanylation of mitochondrial heat shock proteins including HSP60 seems to be involved in this enhanced ROS production, possibly by activating mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening,(26) which suggests that 8-nitro-cGMP and mitochondria form a positive feed-forward loop to amplify ROS production.

The exact amount of 8-nitro-cGMP formed endogenously was determined by means of a quantitative analytical system for 8-nitro-cGMP that utilized liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) with C6 cells stimulated as mentioned above. Our analysis determined that quite high concentrations (>40 µM) of 8-nitro-cGMP occur in cells and that these levels are much higher than those of cGMP (4.6 µM) in the same cells, which indicates that 8-nitro-cGMP is a major cyclic nucleotide generated in cells.(16) Our quantitative LC-MS/MS analysis also revealed that 8-nitro-cGMP is formed by guanylate cyclase-dependent cyclization of 8-nitroguanosine 5'-triphosphate (8-nitro-GTP), which is generated during nitration of the abundant GTP, rather than being formed by direct nitration of cGMP (Fig. 2). Among different guanine nucleotides including cGMP, GTP is the most susceptible to ONOO-mediated nitration.(12) More important, the 8-nitro-GTP formed by the reaction of GTP with ONOO can be an efficient substrate for soluble guanylate cyclase to form 8-nitro-cGMP.(16)

8-Nitro-cGMP formation was also identified in vivo, e.g., in heart and brain tissues in mice.(13,20) ROS and NO generated from Nox2 and iNOS, respectively, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of heart failure.(27,28) By using LC-MS/MS analysis and immunohistochemistry with an anti-8-nitro-cGMP-specific antibody, we showed that 8-nitro-cGMP also forms in mouse hearts after myocardial infarction (MI) or pressure overload.(13) iNOS-deficient hearts evidence no 8-nitro-cGMP formation after MI, which suggests that the iNOS-derived NO may be essential for 8-nitro-cGMP formation in mouse hearts. Lipopolysaccharide or ATP, which reportedly generates NO through iNOS induction in heart cells,(24) induces 8-nitro-cGMP formation and protein S-guanylation in cultured rat neonatal cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts. These results indicate that heart cells actively produce, in an iNOS-dependent manner, 8-nitro-cGMP in response to stimulation with different agonists. In a later section, we discuss the pathological roles of chronic 8-nitro-cGMP formation in heart failure.

8-Nitro-cGMP metabolism by endogenous thiol-containing nucleophiles

The electrophilicity of 8-nitro-cGMP is much lower than that of other endogenous electrophiles in general. Therefore, the relative stability of 8-nitro-cGMP in cells is a well-characterized chemical and pharmacological feature. For example, the second-order rate constant for the reaction of 8-nitro-cGMP with the glutathione (GSH) sulfhydryl at pH 7.4 and 37°C is 0.03 M−1 s−1.(11,29) Also, 8-nitro-cGMP is much less reactive than other endogenous electrophiles including α,β-unsaturated aldehydes, ω-6 and ω-3 unsaturated fatty acids, and nitroalkene fatty acids such as 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal, 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2 (15d-PGJ2), and nitrolinoleic and nitrooleic acids. The second-order rate constants for the reaction of those electrophiles with GSH at pH 7.4 and 37°C are 1.3 M−1 s−1 (4-hydroxy-2-nonenal), 0.7 M−1 s−1 (15d-PGJ2), 355 M−1 s−1 (nitrolinoleic acid), and 183 M−1 s−1 (nitrooleic acid).(2931) These rate constants thus indicate that these electrophiles react with the GSH sulfhydryl 20–10,000 times more rapidly than does 8-nitro-cGMP.(29) 8-Nitro-cGMP therefore has enough stability to remain at appreciable levels in cells even with excessive amounts of GSH, and it can affect its targets effectively even far from the site of 8-nitro-cGMP formation.

Detoxification of some electrophiles with GSH is facilitated by enzymes such as glutathione S-transferase (GST), which in fact plays an important role in eliminating reactive electrophiles generated during oxidative stress.(32) No obvious degradation of 8-nitro-cGMP in the catalytic reaction with GST was observed, however. This remarkable biochemical characteristic of 8-nitro-cGMP supports its high stability and its biological availability for redox signaling in cells.

Reactive cysteine persulfides as nucleophilic regulators of 8-nitro-cGMP metabolism and redox signaling

Our recent studies revealed endogenous formation of highly nucleophilic cysteine-based hydropersulfide species in biological systems.(33) We found that cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) and cystathionine γ-lyase (CSE) are involved in 8-nitro-cGMP metabolism.(13) Extensive biochemical and LC-MS/MS analyses showed that these two enzymes produce cysteine hydropersulfide from cystine used as a substrate.(33) This cysteine hydropersulfide is highly nucleophilic and a stronger antioxidant than is cysteine or GSH (Fig. 3). This unique chemical property of reactive cysteine persulfide relies on adjacent electron pairs, an effect that is known as the α-effect.(34,35) Because of its chemical reactivity that depends on strong nucleophilicity, cysteine hydropersulfide can behave as a typical RSS and reacts quite effectively with 8-nitro-cGMP to form 8-SH-cGMP, with the release of a nitrite anion (Fig. 2), so that RSS such as cysteine hydropersulfide are implicated in the regulation ROS signaling. As Fig. 2 illustrates, two unique second messengers endogenously generated as affected by cysteine hydropersulfide may mediate signal transduction in a manner opposite to their redox properties, i.e., electrophilic 8-nitro-cGMP and nucleophilic 8-SH-cGMP. In fact, 8-SH-cGMP formation was identified as occurring in cultured mammalian cells, in mice, as well as in plant cells.(13,19,33)

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

RSS formation mediated by CBS and CSE. After RSS form, the antioxidant and nucleophilic activities of their terminal thiol residues are enhanced by an effect brought about by lone-pair electrons of adjacent sulfur atoms. CBS, cystathionine β-synthase; CSE, cystathionine γ-lyase.

The importance of RSS in the regulation of redox and electrophilic signaling is bolstered by our recent observation that these reactive persulfide species exist in all organs at appreciable concentrations. In fact, we successfully confirmed the endogenous formation of persulfides as cysteine, homocysteine, and GSH in mouse heart, liver, brain, kidney, spleen, small intestine, lung, and eye.(33) Another intriguing finding is that RSS or reactive cysteine persulfide residues are present in various proteins, although the ubiquitous and possible regulatory function associated with protein persulfides and polysulfides remains unclear.(33)

Electrophilic Cell Signaling Mediated by 8-Nitro-cGMP

Specificity of cell signaling conferred by 8-nitro-cGMP

8-Nitro-cGMP serves as an electrophilic second messenger because of its unique chemical reactivity. In fact, 8-nitro-cGMP undergoes nucleophilic substitution with a protein sulfhydryl, releases the nitro group, and forms a protein Cys-cGMP adduct in a process called protein S-guanylation.(11) Protein S-guanylation as a PTM occurring in cells is a major focus of our present studies, because identification of the physiological relevance of S-guanylation may promote research on oxidative stress and redox signaling.(36)

The low electrophilicity of 8-nitro-cGMP may be essential for the specificity of 8-nitro-cGMP in protein S-guanylation–dependent redox signal transduction. Because of highly reactive electrophiles such as nitro-fatty acids, nucleophilic amino acids other than cysteine, especially histidine and lysine, also become targets in electrophilic reactions via Michael additions,(10) during which they undergo unstable, reversible S-alkylation in a process called transalkylation.(37) As signaling molecules with significant effects on cysteine thiols of acceptor proteins, therefore, reactive electrophiles may require a specific reaction environment or compartmentalization. Certain unique structural characteristics may be required for the stable covalent binding in electrophilic protein S-alkylation occurring in the vicinity of PTM sites. Because of the inert chemical reactivity of 8-nitro-cGMP as a physiological electrophile, however, S-guanylation occurs with sulfhydryls that have high nucleophilicity, as determined by the pKa of the cysteine sulfhydryl moiety. We identified protein targets for S-guanylation that are critically involved in the regulation of redox cellular signaling, as discussed in detail below.

Antioxidant responses induced by S-guanylation of Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1)

The KEAP1-nuclear factor-erythroid-2-related factor 2 (NRF2) system has pivotal roles in the mechanism of the stress response to oxidative and electrophilic insults by means of activating a battery of cytoprotective genes. These gene products are involved in GSH synthesis, NADPH production, scavenging ROS, xenobiotic detoxification, and cross-membrane transport that often results in multidrug resistance of cancers.(3840) NRF2 is a potent transcriptional activator responsible for induction of these antioxidant cytoprotective genes, whereas KEAP1 is an inhibitory regulator of NRF2. Under normal conditions, NRF2 is constantly ubiquitinated by KEAP1 and degraded by proteasomes. In the presence of electrophiles or ROS, KEAP1 is inactivated, and NRF2 is stabilized, binds to antioxidant response elements, and induces the cytoprotective genes. The critical contribution of NRF2 to antioxidant responses has been demonstrated in mice and humans. Nrf2-deficient mice are susceptible to oxidative stress, both exogenous and endogenous. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the promoter region of the mouse Nrf2 gene is associated with reduced expression of the Nrf2 gene and with susceptibility to hyperoxic lung injury in the C57BL/6J mouse.(41) Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the promoter region of the human NRF2 gene(42) are linked to a higher risk of acute lung injury.(43)

The most characteristic feature of NRF2 function is its inducibility: NRF2 is active only when its negative regulator KEAP1 is inactivated in response to stimuli. KEAP1, possessing multiple reactive cysteine residues, serves as a biosensor for stimuli including electrophiles, ROS, reactive nitrogen oxides, and heavy metals, which directly modify cysteine residues of KEAP1. Distinct sets of cysteine residues are responsible for sensing distinct electrophiles.(4446) Substitution of the Cys151 of KEAP1 with serine abrogates the reactivity to a specific set of electrophiles including sulforaphane, dimethyl fumarate, and NO. However, this substitution does not affect the reactivity to nitro-fatty acids, ebselen, or 15d-PGJ2, for which Cys273/288 residues have been suggested as alternative sensor cysteines. An interesting finding is that 8-nitro-cGMP, which operates as part of the NO signaling system, covalently modifies KEAP1 at Cys434 because of its electrophilic nature, which results in S-guanylation of KEAP1 and consequent activation of NRF2.(11,16) Thus, specific cysteine residues are critical for the biosensor function of KEAP1. Clarification of the effect of RSS and polythiolation of KEAP1 cysteine residues may be an intriguing challenge and may help understanding of a fundamental mechanism: how organisms utilize sulfur to sense electrophiles.

Redox signaling by H-Ras activation via S-guanylation

Most typically, cardiac remodeling appears to be modulated by electrophilic signaling mediated by 8-nitro-cGMP. For example, induction of early myocardial senescence is a major risk that exacerbates mortality and cardiac dysfunction after MI. Oxidative stress, nucleotide damage (e.g., by UV irradiation), and abnormal activation of oncogenes, including Ras family G proteins, have reportedly mediated cellular senescence.(47,48) Formation of ROS- or RNS-derived electrophilic species such as 15d-PGJ2 during an oxidative inflammatory response activates H-Ras through covalent modification of cysteine thiols,(49,50) which in turn may activate p53-dependent cellular senescence.(47,48) H-Ras contains two reactive cysteine residues. One is Cys118 located in a guanine nucleotide-binding site, which is reportedly modified by ROS and reactive nitrogen oxide species.(50) However, neuronal NOS-mediated S-nitrosylation of H-Ras at Cys118 reportedly suppressed H-Ras activity induced by a Ca2+ ionophore,(51) which indicates that modification of the Cys118 on Ras does not necessarily activate Ras-dependent signaling pathways.

The other residue is Cys184, one of two palmitoylation sites located at the H-Ras carboxyl-terminal domain.(52) We found that 8-nitro-cGMP, an oxidized nucleotide, increases H-Ras activity via specific S-guanylation of Cys184 in mouse hearts with chronic heart failure. In contrast, other electrophiles, such as 1,2-naphthoquinone (1,2-NQ) and methylmercury (MeHg), do not modify the Cys184 of H-Ras or induce H-Ras activation, which suggests that 8-nitro-cGMP may function as a specific physiological ligand for H-Ras activation. Palmitoylation of Ras predominantly regulates subcellular localization of H-Ras and efficiently activates a local effector (i.e., Raf-1)-mediated signaling pathway.(52) Monopalmitoylation of Cys181 contributes to efficient trafficking of H-Ras to the plasma membrane, and GDP-bound H-Ras is predominantly localized on lipid rafts. GTP loading of H-Ras dissociates H-Ras from the rafts, which results in the efficient association with Raf in the vicinity of the plasma membrane. Cys184 is not essential for targeting of H-Ras to the plasma membrane, but it is indispensable for control of GTP-regulated lateral segmentation of H-Ras between lipid rafts and non-rafts. Thus, S-guanylation of H-Ras at Cys184 may promote localization of H-Ras to the plasma membrane and association with Raf by dissociating H-Ras from lipid rafts. The S-guanylated H-Ras continuously activates downstream phosphorylation signals including ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, which leads to induction of p53/Rb (retinoblastoma gene product)-mediated myocardial cell senescence and thereby results in the transition of the heart condition from hypertrophy to heart failure.

Furthermore, long-term treatment with low doses (50 µmol/kg/day) of sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS) suppresses S-guanylation and activation of H-Ras, myocardial cell senescence, and left ventricular dysfunction in mouse hearts after MI by eliminating 8-nitro-cGMP accumulation.(13) However, NaHS hardly eliminates electrophiles in vitro, which indicates that NaHS may contribute to the formation in cells of more nucleophilic RSS, such as cysteine persulfide and dihydropersulfide,(33,53) and may thus act as a thiol substrate so that endogenous electrophiles are eliminated in the failing heart. In view of the fact that a strong reducing reagent, 2-mercaptoethanol, partially reverses S-guanylation of H-Ras, formation of cysteine persulfide or S-polythiolation of H-Ras at Cys184 determines the reversibility of redox signaling mediated by 8-nitro-cGMP and may predominantly regulate the transition of the heart from adaptive hypertrophy to heart failure.

Capture of RSS Formed in Metabolites and Proteins by Exogenous Electrophiles

Various exogenous electrophiles occur in the environment. For example, 1,2-NQ, a contaminant in atmospheric particulate matter (PM2.5) and in cigarette smoke, is produced during photooxidation of naphthalene. MeHg accumulates in fish (e.g., tuna) through biocondensation. Although these environmental electrophiles cause deleterious effects in the body, we found that 1,2-NQ and MeHg activate redox-dependent cell signaling pathways such as protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B/epidermal growth factor receptor signaling and KEAP1-NRF2 pathways via covalent modification of the reactive thiol groups of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B and KEAP1, respectively, at nontoxic concentrations.(5456) Activation of these redox signaling pathways associated with cellular protection causes elevation of the threshold for environmental electrophile-mediated cell damage.(57)

After MeHg invades cells, it undergoes conjugation with GSH produced by glutamate-cysteine ligase, after which the polar metabolite MeHg-SG is excreted into the extracellular space by means of multidrug resistance-associated protein.(58) Experiments with Nrf2-deficient mice and primary mouse hepatocytes revealed that NRF2 is a transcription factor that has a role in the reduction of MeHg toxicity in vitro and in vivo,(56,59) because NRF2 cooperatively regulates glutamate-cysteine ligase and multidrug resistance-associated protein.(60) However, our recent study showed that the MeHg-SG adduct readily reacts with cellular proteins that have reactive thiol groups, including KEAP1, through S-transmercuration, which results in substantial cytotoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells.(61) This finding suggests that although the MeHg-SG adduct, as well as MeHg, can activate NRF2 coupled to the modification of KEAP1, an increase in MeHg-bound proteins is associated with cellular toxicity. In other words, a detoxification pathway or pathways other than NRF2 for MeHg seems likely.

Several researchers who are interested in endogenous gas signaling molecules, such as NO and carbon monoxide, have believed that endogenous hydrogen sulfide (H2S) also plays a role in regulating neurotransmission and vascular tone.(62) However, the pKa value of H2S is 6.76, which indicates that under physiological conditions approximately 80% of H2S exists as the deprotonated HS anion. We therefore postulated that environmental electrophiles such as MeHg readily undergo nucleophilic attack by the HS anion, which leads to formation of sulfur adducts [e.g., the MeHg-SH adduct and/or bismethylmercury sulfide (MeHg)2S]. In fact, we isolated a previously unknown metabolite of MeHg from SH-SY5Y cells exposed to MeHg and from the liver of rats given MeHg, which we identified as (MeHg)2S.(63) Furthermore, an in vivo study with authentic (MeHg)2S showed that this sulfur adduct is a detoxified metabolite of MeHg.(63) A separate study demonstrated that the 1,2-NQH2-SH adduct (detected as the oxidized 1,2-NQ-SH adduct) forms during interaction of 1,2-NQ with H2S/HS through a 1,4-Michael addition reaction,(13) which suggests that this sulfur adduct may act as a signaling molecule to regulate redox-dependent cell signaling pathways. Consistent with this idea, the 1,2-NQH2-SH adduct was also shown to activate the KEAP1-NRF2 pathway through sulfenic acid formation, followed by KEAP1-S-S-1,2-NQH2 production.(64) This finding is an example of RSS-mediated reversible electrophilic signaling under oxidative stress.

In addition, our recent experiments clearly demonstrated that CBS and CSE mainly catalyze the formation of cysteine hydropersulfide from cystine, but with little appreciable production of H2S/HS.(33) Of interest, this cysteine hydropersulfide reacts spontaneously with GSH, the result being the production of GSH hydropersulfide, which is oxidized to GSH polysulfide.(33) This finding suggests that (MeHg)2S may form in vitro and in vivo during the interaction of MeHg with these RSS. Cell-free experiments with RSS and synthetic polysulfides, such as Na2S4, indicated that (MeHg)2S is the common product after reaction with NaHS, GSH hydropersulfide, GSH polysulfide, Na2S4, and even protein-bound reactive persulfide/polysulfide species,(65) as Fig. 4 shows. In addition to MeHg, we also found that sulfur adducts of N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine, an electrophilic metabolite of acetaminophen, are produced in the biological samples of mice upon acetaminophen exposure.(66) For these reasons, we thought that an (MeHg)2S formation assay would be a convenient method to identify proteins with reactive persulfides or polysulfides. Although Cibacron Blue 3GA column chromatography of mouse liver cytosol revealed many proteins with reactive persulfide or polysulfide moieties, as mentioned in our previous study that utilized the Tag-Switch-Tag assay,(33) subsequent Sephacryl S-100 column chromatography showed a highly purified 25-kDa protein to be GST P1.(65) Incubation of recombinant GST P1 with MeHg confirmed that this protein certainly contains reactive persulfides or polysulfides bound to the cysteine residues.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Formation of bismethylmercury sulfide during interaction with RSS. CBS, cystathionine β-synthase; CSE, cystathionine γ-lyase; GSH, glutathione; GS-SG, oxidized glutathione; H2S, hydrogen sulfide; HS, hydrogen sulfide anion; (MeHg)2S, bismethylmercury sulfide; MeHg, methylmercury.

Little doubt remains that (MeHg)2S is produced as a result of the capture by MeHg of a mobilized sulfur atom from endogenous RSS and protein-bound RSS (Fig. 4). Because RSS have high nucleophilicity and antioxidant capability, substantial (MeHg)2S formation is associated with a reduction in nucleophilic and/or reductive cellular status. Thus, we propose a new concept: RSS protect cells from electrophilic insults, and excessive exposure to electrophilic species appears to deplete these RSS, which leads to greater susceptibility to electrophile-dependent toxicity.

Conclusion

Redox signaling is precisely regulated by various sensor and effector molecules. 8-Nitro-cGMP is an endogenous electrophile with physiological functions and possesses a unique property contributing to its specificity and selectivity for ROS signal transduction. 8-Nitro-cGMP may thus be able to serve as a natural endogenous ROS ligand that can induce specific cellular responses through S-guanylation of specific cysteine residues in redox sensor-effector proteins, such as KEAP1 and H-Ras. Recent progress in identification of RSS formed endogenously revealed that RSS such as reactive cysteine persulfides found in abundant amounts in cells possess markedly highly antioxidant and nucleophilic properties. These RSS are critically involved not only in detoxification of environmental electrophiles but also in regulation of ROS signaling by means of 8-nitro-cGMP metabolism. Evidence of protein S-guanylation induced by 8-nitro-cGMP and regulation of ROS signaling by RSS may thus warrant further innovative research that may reveal new aspects of ROS- and RSS-related redox chemical biology, physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmaceutical chemistry and may promote the development of novel therapeutics for oxidative stress-related diseases.

Acknowledgments

We thank J.B. Gandy for her excellent editing of the manuscript. We gratefully thank Profs. M. Yamamoto, K. Uchida, and T. Sawa, and other Principal Investigators who were responsible for the 12 research areas of the program project entitled “Signaling Functions of Reactive Oxygen Species,” which was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (Research in a Proposed Research Area) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan, from 2008 to 2012, for their invaluable discussions and collaboration. This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) to M.N. (No. 25293018), (S) to Y.K. (No. 25220103), (C) to H.I. (No. 25430069), (C) to S.F. (No. 15K08456), (B) to H.M. (No. 15H04692), and (A) to T.A. (No. 25253020); by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (Research in a Proposed Research Area) to T.A., H.M., M.N., H.I., and Y.K., from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT); and by PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency.

Abbreviations

CBS

cystathionine β-synthase

CSE

cystathionine γ-lyase

15d-PGJ2

15-deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2

GSH

glutathione

GST

glutathione S-transferase

iNOS

inducible NO synthase

KEAP1

Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1

LC-MS/MS

liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

MeHg

methylmercury

(MeHg)2S

bismethylmercury sulfide

MI

myocardial infarction

8-nitro-cGMP

8-nitroguanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate

8-nitro-GTP

8-nitroguanosine 5'-triphosphate

Nox

NADPH oxidase

1,2-NQ

1,2-naphthoquinone

NRF2

nuclear factor-erythroid-2-related factor 2

PTM

posttranslational modification

ROS

reactive oxygen species

RSS

reactive sulfur species

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

  • 1.Beckman JS, Beckman TW, Chen J, Marshall PA, Freeman BA. Apparent hydroxyl radical production by peroxynitrite: implications for endothelial injury from nitric oxide and superoxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:1620–1624. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.4.1620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.van der Vliet A, Cross CE. Oxidants, nitrosants, and the lung. Am J Med. 2000;109:398–421. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00479-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Forman HJ, Fukuto JM, Torres M. Redox signaling: thiol chemistry defines which reactive oxygen and nitrogen species can act as second messengers. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004;287:C246–C256. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00516.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Halliwell B. Biochemistry of oxidative stress. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007;35 (Pt 5):1147–1150. doi: 10.1042/BST0351147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Trachootham D, Alexandre J, Huang P. Targeting cancer cells by ROS-mediated mechanisms: a radical therapeutic approach? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8:579–591. doi: 10.1038/nrd2803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sumimoto H. Structure, regulation and evolution of Nox-family NADPH oxidases that produce reactive oxygen species. FEBS J. 2008;275:3249–3277. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06488.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.van der Vliet A. NADPH oxidases in lung biology and pathology: host defense enzymes, and more. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008;44:938–955. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.11.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Matoba T, Shimokawa H, Nakashima M, et al. Hydrogen peroxide is an endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor in mice. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:1521–1530. doi: 10.1172/JCI10506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Burgoyne JR, Madhani M, Cuello F, et al. Cysteine redox sensor in PKGIα enables oxidant-induced activation. Science. 2007;317:1393–1397. doi: 10.1126/science.1144318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schopfer FJ, Baker PR, Freeman BA. NO-dependent protein nitration: a cell signaling event or an oxidative inflammatory response? Trends Biochem Sci. 2003;28:646–654. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2003.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sawa T, Zaki MH, Okamoto T, et al. Protein S-guanylation by the biological signal 8-nitroguanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate. Nat Chem Biol. 2007;3:727–735. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2007.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ahmed KA, Sawa T, Ihara H, et al. Regulation by mitochondrial superoxide and NADPH oxidase of cellular formation of nitrated cyclic GMP: potential implications for ROS signalling. Biochem J. 2012;441:719–730. doi: 10.1042/BJ20111130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nishida M, Sawa T, Kitajima N, et al. Hydrogen sulfide anion regulates redox signaling via electrophile sulfhydration. Nat Chem Biol. 2012;8:714–724. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schopfer FJ, Cipollina C, Freeman BA. Formation and signaling actions of electrophilic lipids. Chem Rev. 2011;111:5997–6021. doi: 10.1021/cr200131e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Uchida K, Shibata T. 15-Deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2: an electrophilic trigger of cellular responses. Chem Res Toxicol. 2008;21:138–144. doi: 10.1021/tx700177j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fujii S, Sawa T, Ihara H, et al. The critical role of nitric oxide signaling, via protein S-guanylation and nitrated cyclic GMP, in the antioxidant adaptive response. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:23970–23984. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.145441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ito C, Saito Y, Nozawa T, et al. Endogenous nitrated nucleotide is a key mediator of autophagy and innate defense against bacteria. Mol Cell. 2013;52:794–804. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.10.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Joudoi T, Shichiri Y, Kamizono N, et al. Nitrated cyclic GMP modulates guard cell signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2013;25:558–571. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.105049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Honda K, Yamada N, Yoshida R, et al. 8-Mercapto-cyclic GMP mediates hydrogen sulfide-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015;56:1481–1489. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcv069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kunieda K, Tsutsuki H, Ida T, et al. 8-Nitro-cGMP enhances SNARE complex formation through S-guanylation of Cys90 in SNAP25. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2015;6:1715–1725. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Akashi S, Ahmed AK, Sawa T, et al. Persistent activation of cGMP-dependent protein kinase by a nitrated cyclic nucleotide via site-specific protein S-guanylation. Biochemistrty. 2015 doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00774. provisionally accepted. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tsuchiya Y, Asano T, Nakayama K, Kato T, Jr, Karin M, Kamata H. Nuclear IKKβ is an adaptor protein for IκBα ubiquitination and degradation in UV-induced NF-κB activation. Mol Cell. 2010;39:570–582. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.07.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Numajiri N, Takasawa K, Nishiya T, et al. On-off system for PI3-kinase-Akt signaling through S-nitrosylation of phosphatase with sequence homology to tensin (PTEN) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:10349–10354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103503108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nishida M, Ogushi M, Suda R, et al. Heterologous down-regulation of angiotensin type 1 receptors by purinergic P2Y2 receptor stimulation through S-nitrosylation of NF-κB. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:6662–6667. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017640108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Radi R. Nitric oxide, oxidants, and protein tyrosine nitration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:4003–4008. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307446101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rahaman MM, Sawa T, Ahtesham AK, et al. S-Guanylation proteomics for redox-based mitochondrial signaling. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014;20:295–307. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.4606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liu YH, Carretero OA, Cingolani OH, et al. Role of inducible nitric oxide synthase in cardiac function and remodeling in mice with heart failure due to myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;289:H2616–H2623. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00546.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Krijnen PA, Meischl C, Hack CE, et al. Increased Nox2 expression in human cardiomyocytes after acute myocardial infarction. J Clin Pathol. 2003;56:194–199. doi: 10.1136/jcp.56.3.194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sawa T, Arimoto H, Akaike T. Regulation of redox signaling involving chemical conjugation of protein thiols by nitric oxide and electrophiles. Bioconjug Chem. 2010;21:1121–1129. doi: 10.1021/bc900396u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Baker LM, Baker PR, Golin-Bisello F, et al. Nitro-fatty acid reaction with glutathione and cysteine. Kinetic analysis of thiol alkylation by a Michael addition reaction. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:31085–31093. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704085200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Doorn JA, Petersen DR. Covalent adduction of nucleophilic amino acids by 4-hydroxynonenal and 4-oxononenal. Chem Biol Interact. 2003;143–144:93–100. doi: 10.1016/s0009-2797(02)00178-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hayes JD, Flanagan FU, Jowsey IR. Glutathione transferases. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005;45:51–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ida T, Sawa T, Ihara H, et al. Reactive cysteine persulfides and S-polythiolation regulate oxidative stress and redox signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:7606–7611. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321232111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ono K, Akaike T, Sawa T, et al. Redox chemistry and chemical biology of H2S, hydropersulfides, and derived species: implications of their possible biological activity and utility. Free Radic Biol Med. 2014;77:82–94. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Edwards JO, Pearson RG. The factors determining nucleophilic reactivities. J Am Chem Soc. 1962;84:16–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fujii S, Akaike T. Redox signaling by 8-nitro-cyclic guanosine monophosphate: nitric oxide- and reactive oxygen species-derived electrophilic messenger. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013;19:1236–1246. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.5067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rudolph TK, Freeman BA. Transduction of redox signaling by electrophile-protein reactions. Sci Signal. 2009;2:re7. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.290re7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Motohashi H, Yamamoto M. Nrf2-Keap1 defines a physiologically important stress response mechanism. Trends Mol Med. 2004;10:549–557. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2004.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Uruno A, Motohashi H. The Keap1-Nrf2 system as an in vivo sensor for electrophiles. Nitric Oxide. 2011;25:153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2011.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mitsuishi Y, Taguchi K, Kawatani Y, et al. Nrf2 redirects glucose and glutamine into anabolic pathways in metabolic reprogramming. Cancer Cell. 2012;22:66–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cho HY, Jedlicka AE, Reddy SP, Zhang LY, Kensler TW, Kleeberger SR. Linkage analysis of susceptibility to hyperoxia. Nrf2 is a candidate gene. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2002;26:42–51. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.26.1.4536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yamamoto T, Yoh K, Kobayashi A, et al. Identification of polymorphisms in the promoter region of the human NRF2 gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;321:72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.06.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Marzec JM, Christie JD, Reddy SP, et al. Functional polymorphisms in the transcription factor NRF2 in humans increase the risk of acute lung injury. FASEB J. 2007;21:2237–2246. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-7759com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kobayashi M, Li L, Iwamoto N, et al. The antioxidant defense system Keap1-Nrf2 comprises a multiple sensing mechanism for responding to a wide range of chemical compounds. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:493–502. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01080-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.McMahon M, Lamont DJ, Beattie KA, Hayes JD. Keap1 perceives stress via three sensors for the endogenous signaling molecules nitric oxide, zinc, and alkenals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:18838–18843. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007387107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Takaya K, Suzuki T, Motohashi H, et al. Validation of the multiple sensor mechanism of the Keap1-Nrf2 system. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;53:817–827. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.06.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Serrano M, Lin AW, McCurrach ME, Beach D, Lowe SW. Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a. Cell. 1997;88:593–602. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81902-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wu C, Miloslavskaya I, Demontis S, Maestro R, Galaktionov K. Regulation of cellular response to oncogenic and oxidative stress by Seladin-1. Nature. 2004;432:640–645. doi: 10.1038/nature03173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lander HM, Milbank AJ, Tauras JM, et al. Redox regulation of cell signalling. Nature. 1996;381:380–381. doi: 10.1038/381380a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Oliva JL, Pérez-Sala D, Castrillo A, et al. The cyclopentenone 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2 binds to and activates H-Ras. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:4772–4777. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0735842100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Raines KW, Cao GL, Lee EK, Rosen GM, Shapiro P. Neuronal nitric oxide synthase-induced S-nitrosylation of H-Ras inhibits calcium ionophore-mediated extracellular-signal-regulated kinase activity. Biochem J. 2006;397:329–336. doi: 10.1042/BJ20052002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hancock JF. Ras proteins: different signals from different locations. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4:373–384. doi: 10.1038/nrm1105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chen W, Rosser EW, Matsunaga T, Pacheco A, Akaike T, Xian M. The development of fluorescent probes for visualizing intracellular hydrogen polysulfides. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015 doi: 10.1002/anie.201506887. in press. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201506887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Iwamoto N, Sumi D, Ishii T, et al. Chemical knockdown of protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B by 1,2-naphthoquinone through covalent modification causes persistent transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:33396–33404. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705224200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Miura T, Shinkai Y, Jiang HY, et al. Initial response and cellular protection through the Keap1/Nrf2 system during the exposure of primary mouse hepatocytes to 1,2-naphthoquinone. Chem Res Toxicol. 2011;24:559–567. doi: 10.1021/tx100427p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Toyama T, Sumi D, Shinkai Y, et al. Cytoprotective role of Nrf2/Keap1 system in methylmercury toxicity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;363:645–650. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kumagai Y, Shinkai Y, Miura T, Cho AK. The chemical biology of naphthoquinones and its environmental implications. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012;52:221–247. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010611-134517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kumagai Y, Kanda H, Shinkai Y, Toyama T. The role of the Keap1/Nrf2 pathway in the cellular response to methylmercury. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2013;2013:848279. doi: 10.1155/2013/848279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Toyama T, Shinkai Y, Yasutake A, Uchida K, Yamamoto M, Kumagai Y. Isothiocyanates reduce mercury accumulation via an Nrf2-dependent mechanism during exposure of mice to methylmercury. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:1117–1122. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1003123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Taguchi K, Motohashi H, Yamamoto M. Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway in stress response and cancer evolution. Genes Cells. 2011;16:123–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2010.01473.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yoshida E, Abiko Y, Kumagai Y. Glutathione adduct of methylmercury activates the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway in SH-SY5Y cells. Chem Res Toxicol. 2014;27:1780–1786. doi: 10.1021/tx5002332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gadalla MM, Snyder SH. Hydrogen sulfide as a gasotransmitter. J Neurochem. 2010;113:14–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06580.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Yoshida E, Toyama T, Shinkai Y, Sawa T, Akaike T, Kumagai Y. Detoxification of methylmercury by hydrogen sulfide-producing enzyme in mammalian cells. Chem Res Toxicol. 2011;24:1633–1635. doi: 10.1021/tx200394g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Shinkai Y, Abiko Y, Ida T, et al. Reactive sulfur species-mediated activation of the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway by 1,2-naphthoquinone through sulfenic acids formation under oxidative stress. Chem Res Toxicol. 2015;28:838–847. doi: 10.1021/tx500416y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Abiko Y, Yoshida E, Ishii I, Fukuto JM, Akaike T, Kumagai Y. Involvement of reactive persulfides in biological bismethylmercury sulfide formation. Chem Res Toxicol. 2015;28:1301–1306. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Abiko Y, Ishii I, Kamata S, et al. Formation of sulfur adducts of N-acetyl-p-benzoquinoneimine, an electrophilic metabolite of acetaminophen in vivo: Participarion of reactive persulfides. Chem Res Toxicol. 2015;28:1796–1802. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition are provided here courtesy of The Society for Free Radical Research Japan

RESOURCES