Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 18.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2015 Dec 4;17(24):6074–6077. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b03096

Copper–Catalyzed Cyclopropanol Ring Opening Csp3–Csp3 Cross–Couplings with (Fluoro)Alkyl Halides

Zhishi Ye 1, Kristen E Gettys 1, Xingyu Shen 1, Mingji Dai 1
PMCID: PMC4788964  NIHMSID: NIHMS761599  PMID: 26635251

Abstract

Novel and general copper-catalyzed cyclopropanol ring opening cross-coupling reactions with difluoroalkyl bromides, perfluoroalkyl iodides, monofluoroalkyl bromides, and 2-bromo-2-alkylesters to synthesize various β-(fluoro)alkylated ketones are reported. The reactions feature mild conditions and excellent functional group compatibility, and can be scaled up to gram scale. Preliminary mechanistic studies suggest the involvement of radical intermediates. The difluoro-alkyl-alkyl cross-coupling products can also be readily converted to more valuable and diverse gem-difluoro-containing compounds by taking advantage of the carbonyl group resulting from cyclopropanol ring opening.

graphic file with name nihms-761599-f0001.jpg


Recently, significant progress has been made in the development of transition metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of alkyl electrophiles and alkyl nucleophiles, including enantioselective variants. Most of the commonly used alkyl nucleophiles in these alkyl-alkyl cross-coupling processes are alkyl Grignard reagents, alkyl zinc reagents, and alkyl boron reagents.1 Some of these reagents suffer from poor functional group compatibility, have to be generated in situ or right before use, and are not stable for long-term storage. Due to the importance of alkyl-alkyl cross-couplings in medicinal chemistry, natural product synthesis, and other related areas, there is a great need to expand the scope of alkyl nucleophiles. Furthermore, due to the importance of fluorinated molecules in medicinal chemistry and many other fields,2 the demand for efficient and reliable methods for their synthesis has increased dramatically. Despite recent advances,3 direct difluoroalkylation or monofluoroalkylation of alkyl nucleophiles have been limited4 in comparison to the introduction of such groups on aromatic systems5 and unsaturated systems such as olefins and alkynes.6 Efficient methods for direct fluoroalkyl-alkyl cross-coupling reactions are highly desirable. Recently, Fu et al. reported an elegant nickel-catalyzed alkyl-alkyl cross-coupling of fluorinated secondary electrophiles (cf. 1→2, Scheme 1A).4a

Cyclopropanols are important and useful functional groups and can be readily accessed via the Kulinkovich reaction or the Simmons-Smith protocols.7 They are bench stable and can be stored for a relatively long time. Due to its intrinsic ring strain, cyclopropanols are prone to ring opening reactions and are often viewed as homoenolate equivalents. Therefore, cyclopropanols could be important potential alkyl nucleophiles in alkyl-alkyl cross-coupling reactions. Moreover, the resulting coupling products would be equipped with a ketone functional group, which can be transformed to a variety of products due to the rich carbonyl chemistry. Currently, most of the transition-metal-catalyzed cyclopropanol ring opening cross-couplings focus on palladium-catalyzed C-C bond formation,8 which is significantly limited by the proclivity of β-H elimination. Copper, in comparison to palladium, is more abundant and cheaper, and less prone to β-H elimination chemistry.9 However, copper-promoted or copper-catalyzed cyclopropanol ring opening cross-coupling reactions have been very rare.10 Recently, Cha and coworkers have developed elegant SN2′ alkylations of the Zn(II)/Cu(I)-homoenolate derived from treating cyclopropanols with more than stoichiometric amount of CuCN and one equivalent of ZnEt2 (cf. 3→4, Scheme 1B)10c and applied this chemistry in total synthesis of natural products.10d,e We have developed copper-catalyzed cyclopropanol ring opening electrophilic cross-coupling reactions to synthesize various β-CF3, β-SCF3, and β-amino-substituted carbonyl products.11a,b Herein, we report novel and unprecedented copper-catalyzed cyclopropanol ring opening alkyl-alkyl cross-coupling reactions with difluoroalkyl bromides, perfluoroalkyl iodides, monofluoroalkyl bromides, and 2-bromo-2-alkylesters as electrophiles (Scheme 1C). In addition to the catalytic nature, the selectivity of breaking the strained Walsh bond of unsymmetrical cyclopropanols is opposite from the previous cases,10c, 11b which presumably due to a radical ring opening process of the cyclopropanols.

Due to the importance and prevalence of difluoroalkyl groups in bioactive molecules,12 we started our exploration with 2-bromo-2,2-difluoroacetate (11) as the electrophilic coupling partner with cyclopropanols. After extensive reaction condition optimizations (see the Supporting Information), we discovered that (i) CuI is superior to CuCN, CuTc, and Cu(MeCN)4PF6; (ii) 2,2′-bipyridine or 9,10-phenanthroline ligand is critical; (iii) the reaction is very sensitive to solvent and MeCN is much better than other solvents such as THF, PhMe, DMF, DCE, 1,4-dioxane, and DMSO; (iv) a base is necessary to neutralize the acid generated in the reaction system. Under the conditions of catalytic amount of CuI/9,10-phenanthroline in MeCN at 80 °C with K2CO3 as base, optimal yields of 2,2-difluoro-1,5-dicarbonyl products13 (cf. 12) could be obtained from various cyclopropanols and 11.

We then investigated the substrate scope in terms of both cyclopropanols and the electrophilic bromodifluoroalkyl coupling partners (Figure 2, 3, and 4). To our satisfaction, the reaction has broad substrate scope and tolerates a variety of functional groups. Both aryl and alkyl substituted cyclopropanols underwent the desired ring opening reactions with 11 to provide various β-difluoroalkylated ketone products in good to excellent yield (Figure 2). Alkyl/aryl ether (12a, 12c, 12f), benzoate (12g), TBS-ether (12h), α,β-unsaturated ester (12j) and aldehyde (12k), amide (12l), and epoxide (12m) are well tolerated. The reaction could also be conducted in gram-scale (12a, Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cyclopropanol substrate scopea. [a] General reaction conditions: A solution of 3a (0.1 mmol), 11 (0.4 mmol), CuI (0.01 mmol), phenanthroline (0.02 mmol), K2CO3 (0.2 mmol) were stirred in MeCN (1 mL) at 80 °C for 10-12 h. The reaction process was monitored by thin-layer chromatography. Isolated yield from flash chromatography was given; [b] gram scale.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Unsymmetrical cyclopropanol substrate scopea. [a] Isolated yield with 13/14 ratio in parenthesis.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Difluoroalkyl halides substrate scopea. [a] Yield of isolated product; [b] iPr2NH as base; [c] LiOtBu as base; [d] with perfluorobutyl iodide; [e] with perfluorohexyl iodide.

We next explored unsymmetrical cyclopropanol substrates (cf. 3, Figure 3). In this scenario, one question was apparent to us: which Walsh bond, the less substituted bond “a” or the more substituted bond “b”, would be selectively broken for the cross-coupling? It has been shown that radical promoted cyclopropanol ring opening tends to break bond “b” to provide more stable and more substituted β-alkyl radical14 and formation of metallo-homoenolate favors breaking bond “a” to generate less substitute metallo-homoenolate.10c,11b In our case, the more substituted Walsh bond “b” was selectively cleaved and the difluoroalkylation occurred at the more substituted carbon, which indicates a radical cyclopropanol ring opening process. The selectivity is excellent for the cases of aryl substituted cyclopropanols and products 13a-c were produced as the dominant products. While 13d was produced in high selectivity (17/1), the selectivity dropped significantly in the case of 13e (2.4/1). Additionally, aldehyde product 13f could be obtained in good selectivity as well.

Other halodifluoroalkyl electrophiles such as 2-bromo-2,2-difluoroamides, (bromodifluoromethyl)phosphonates, and perfluoroalkyl iodides work smoothly under the reaction conditions (Figure 4). Morpholine- (16a), Bocprotected piperazine- (16c), benzoazepane- (16d), indoline- (16e), and azitidine-derived (16j) difluoroamides can be produced in good to excellent yield. With (bromodifluoromethyl)phosphonate as electrophile, a strong base, LiOtBu has to be used and the reaction yield was relatively low (16k, 32%). In the case of perfluoroalkylation (16l and 16m), the corresponding alkyl iodides were used and good yields were obtained.

We then moved beyond difluoroalkyl electrophiles and explored the use of other alkyl electrophiles (Figure 5). To our delight, simply switching the base from K2CO3 to iPr2NH and using CuI or CuCl as catalyst, electrophiles such as 2-bromo-2-alkyl acetates and 2-bromo-2-fluoroacetates became effective coupling partners. We also observed some changes in comparison to the difluoroalkylation cases. Free alcohol (cf. 18j) and terminal olefin (cf. 18h), which are not compatible in the previous cases, are well tolerated in the slightly modified conditions. In general, good reaction yields could be obtained and a variety of functional groups including benzoate (18e), primary TBS-ether (18f), epoxide (18g), and aryl bromide (18n) are compatible under the reaction conditions.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Other alkyl halides substrate scopea. [a] Isolated yield; [b] CuI was used.

One advantage of using cyclopropanols as nucelophilic alkyl cross-coupling partners is that the coupling products are equipped with a ketone functional group. Due to rich chemistry of carbonyl group, the coupling products can be converted to a diverse collection of products using standard carbonyl transformations. For example (Figure 6), Fisher indole synthesis was used to convert 12a to indole-containing biaryl product 19 in 94% yield.15 Reductive amination followed by lactam formation provided α,α-difluorolactam 20 in excellent yield.16 When NaBH4 was used, 3,3-difluoro-6-aryltetrahydropyran product 21 was obtained in 87% yield.17 These scaffolds are of great medicinal importance but are otherwise challenging to access.15-17 The ketone carbonyl group could be reduced to a methylene group as well (cf. 12a→22), which further expands the potential use of cyclopropanols as alkyl cross-coupling partners.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Synthetic transformations of 12a.

Mechanistically, both the conversion of 22 with a double bond to 23 and the formation of 24 when TEMPO was added to the reaction of 3aa and 11 (Figure 7) suggesting the formation of a radical at the α-carbon bearing the two fluorine atoms presumable via a single electron transfer (SET) process between CuI and the bromides (22 or 11). The resulting Cu(II) salt would then oxidize cyclopropanols via another SET process to promote a radical cyclopropane ring cleavage as evidenced by the use of unsymmetrical cyclopropanols to generate a more stable β-alkyl radical for following cross-couplings.14,18

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Preliminary mechanistic studies.

In summary, we have developed a novel umpolung strategy for the synthesis of β-(fluoro)alkylated ketones via copper-catalyzed cyclopropanol ring opening Csp3-Csp3 cross-couplings with various alkyl halides including difluoroalkyl bromides, perfluoroalkyl iodides, monofluoroalkyl bromides, and 2-bromo-2-alkylesters. Many functional groups are tolerated under the mild reaction conditions. The reaction can also be scaled up. In addition to its catalytic nature, a different cyclopropane ring opening mode has been observed in comparison to the previous cases. Preliminary machanistic studies indicate the involvement of radical intermediates. The coupling products could be converted to a diverse collection of important compounds. This chemistry demonstrates the significant potential of cyclopropanol and related systems as useful nucleophiles in alkyl-alkyl cross-coupling reactions. We are currently investigating the detailed reaction mechanisms as well as developing enantioselective versions of this type of transformation.

Supplementary Material

Suppl.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Selected examples and this work.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank Purdue University for startup support, the NIH P30CA023168 for supporting shared NMR resources to Purdue Center for Cancer Research, and the ACS petroleum research foundation (PRF# 54896-DNI1).

Footnotes

Supporting Information

Experimental procedures and characterization for new compounds are provided. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

REFERENCES

  • (1) (a).For reviews: Cherney AH, Kadunce NT, Reisman SE. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:9587. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00162.; Swift EC, Jarvo ER. Tetrahedron. 2013;69:5799. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2013.05.001.; Rudolph A, Lautens M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009;48:2656. doi: 10.1002/anie.200803611.; Hu X. Chem. Sci. 2011;2:1867.; Liang Y, Fu GC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:5520. doi: 10.1021/ja501815p.; Binder JT, Cordier CJ, Fu GC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:17003. doi: 10.1021/ja308460z.
  • (2) (a).Ilardi EA, Vitaku E, Njardarson JT. J. Med. Chem. 2014;57:2832. doi: 10.1021/jm401375q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nelson DJ, Brammer CN, editors. Fluorine-Related Nanoscience with Energy Applications. American Chemical Society; Washington, DC: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • (3) (a).For reviews: Wang J, Sánchez-Roselló M, Aceña JL, del Pozo C, Sorochinsky AE, Fustero S, Soloshonok VA, Liu H. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:2432. doi: 10.1021/cr4002879.; Ni C, Hu M, Hu J. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:765. doi: 10.1021/cr5002386.; Yang X, Wu T, Phipps RJ, Toste FD. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:826. doi: 10.1021/cr500277b.; Campbell MG, Ritter T. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:612. doi: 10.1021/cr500366b.; Alonso C, Martínez de Marigorta E, Rubiales G, Palacios F. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:1847. doi: 10.1021/cr500368h.; Xu J, Liu X, Fu Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014;55:585.
  • (4) (a).For leading references: Liang Y, Fu GC. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015;54:9047. doi: 10.1002/anie.201503297.; Yang M-H, Orsi DL, Altman RA. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015;54:2361. doi: 10.1002/anie.201410039.; Kitazume T, Ishikawa N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985;107:5186.
  • (5) (a).Uneyama K, Tanaka H, Kobayashi S, Shioyama M, Amii H. Org. Lett. 2004;6:2733. doi: 10.1021/ol049055m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Guo Y, Shreeve JM. Chem. Commun. 2007:3583. doi: 10.1039/b705137a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Prakash GKS, Ganesh SK, Jones J-P, Kulkarni A, Masood K, Swabeck JK, Olah GA. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012;51:12090. doi: 10.1002/anie.201205850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Qi Q, Shen Q, Lu L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:6548. doi: 10.1021/ja301705z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Fier PS, Hartwig JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:5524. doi: 10.1021/ja301013h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Ge S, Chaladaj W, Hartwig JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:4149. doi: 10.1021/ja501117v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Ge S, Arlow SI, Mormino MG, Hartwig JF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:14401. doi: 10.1021/ja508590k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Min Q-Q, Yin Z, Feng Z, Guo W-H, Zhang X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:1230. doi: 10.1021/ja4114825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Feng Z, Min Q-Q, Xiao Y-L, Zhang B, Zhang X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014;53:1669. doi: 10.1002/anie.201309535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (j) Xiao Y-L, Guo W-H, He G-Z, Pan Q, Zhang X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014;53:9909. doi: 10.1002/anie.201405653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (k) Yu Y-B, He G-Z, Zhang X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014;53:10457. doi: 10.1002/anie.201405204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (l) Matheis C, Jouvin K, Goossen LJ. Org. Lett. 2014;16:5984. doi: 10.1021/ol5030037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (m) Gu Y, Leng X, Shen Q. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:5405. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (n) Wang L, Wei X-J, Jia W-L, Zhong J-J, Wu L-Z, Liu Q. Org. Lett. 2014;16:5842. doi: 10.1021/ol502676y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (o) Shi S-L, Buchwald SL. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015;54:1646. doi: 10.1002/anie.201410471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (p) Ivanova MV, Bayle A, Besset T, Poisson T, Pannecoucke X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015;54:13406. doi: 10.1002/anie.201507130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6) (a).For leading references: Xu T, Cheung CW, Hu X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014;53:4910. doi: 10.1002/anie.201402511.; Ma G, Wan W, Li J, Hu Q, Jiang H, Zhu S, Wang J, Hao J. Chem. Commun. 2014;50:9749. doi: 10.1039/c4cc04591b.; Yu C, Iqbal N, Park SE, Cho J. Chem. Commun. 2014;50:12884. doi: 10.1039/c4cc05467a.; Fu W, Zhu M, Zou G, Xu C, Wang Z. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2014;3:1273.; Riente P, Pericàs MA. ChemSusChem. 2015;8:1841. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201403466.
  • (7) (a).For reviews, see: Gibson DH, DePuy CH. Chem. Rev. 1974;74:605.; Kulinkovich OG. Chem. Rev. 2003;103:2597. doi: 10.1021/cr010012i.
  • (8) (a).For a review, see: Rosa D, Nikolaev A, Nithiy N, Orellana A. Synlett. 2015:441.; For examples, see: Aoki S, Fujimura T, Nakamura E, Kuwajima I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988;110:3296.; Fujimura T, Aoki S, Nakamura E. J. Org. Chem. 1991;56:2809.; Rosa D, Orellana A. Org. Lett. 2011;13:110. doi: 10.1021/ol1026409.; Rosa D, Orellana A. Chem. Commun. 2012;48:1922. doi: 10.1039/c2cc16758a.; Parida BB, Das PP, Niocel M, Cha JK. Org. Lett. 2013;15:1780. doi: 10.1021/ol400666x.; Cheng K, Walsh PJ. Org. Lett. 2013;15:2298. doi: 10.1021/ol4008876.; Rosa D, Orellana A. Chem. Commun. 2013;49:5420. doi: 10.1039/c3cc42080a.; Nithiy N, Orellana A. Org. Lett. 2014;16:5854. doi: 10.1021/ol5027188.; Nikolaev A, Nithiy N, Orellana A. Synlett. 2014:2301.
  • (9) (a).For leading references: Ren P, Stern L-A, Hu X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012;51:9110. doi: 10.1002/anie.201204275.; Yang C-T, Zhang Z-Q, Liang J, Liu J-H, Lu X-Y, Chen H-H, Liu L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:11123. doi: 10.1021/ja304848n.; You W, Brown MK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:14730. doi: 10.1021/ja509056j.; Yang Y, Shi S-L, Niu D, Liu P, Buchwald SL. Science. 2015;349:62. doi: 10.1126/science.aab3753.
  • (10) (a).Ryu I, Ando M, Ogawa A, Murai S, Sonoda N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983;105:7192. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ryu I, Matsumoto K, Kameyama Y, Ando M, Kusumoto N, Ogawa A, Kambe N, Murai S, Sonoda N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993;115:12330. [Google Scholar]; (c) Das PP, Belmore K, Cha JK. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012;51:9517. doi: 10.1002/anie.201205190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Rao NN, Parida BB, Cha JK. Org. Lett. 2014;16:6208. doi: 10.1021/ol503136s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Rao NN, Cha JK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:2243. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b00243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Murali RVNS, Rao NN, Cha JK. Org. Lett. 2015;17:3854. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b01789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11) (a).Ye Z, Dai MJ. Org. Lett. 2015;17:2190. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b00828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Li Y, Ye Z, Bellman TM, Chi T, Dai MJ. Org. Lett. 2015;17:2186. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b00782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Kananovich DG, Konik YA, Zubrytski DM, Järving I, Lopp M. Chem. Commun. 2015;51:8439. doi: 10.1039/c5cc02386f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) He X-P, Shu Y-J, Dai J-J, Zhang W-M, Feng Y-S, Xu H-J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015;13:7159. doi: 10.1039/c5ob00808e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12) (a).Han C, Salyer AE, Kim EH, Jiang X, Jarrard RE, Powers MS, Kirchhoff AM, Salvador TK, Chester JA, Hockerman GH. J. Med. Chem. 2013;56:2456. doi: 10.1021/jm301805e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Han C, Kim EH, Colby DA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:5802. doi: 10.1021/ja202213f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Bégué J-P, Bonnet-Delpon D. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry of Fluorine. Wiley; Hoboken: 2008. pp. 246–256. chap. 7. [Google Scholar]
  • (13) (a).Sato K, Nakazato S, Enko H, Tsujita H, Fujita K, Yamamoto T, Omote M, Ando A, Kumadaki I. J. Fluorine Chem. 2003;121:105. [Google Scholar]; (b) Sato K, Omote M, Ando A, Kumadaki I. J. Fluorine Chem. 2004;125:509. [Google Scholar]; (c) Kim BC, Park A, An JE, Lee WK, Lee HB, Shin H. Synthesis. 2012;44:3165. [Google Scholar]
  • (14).For a leading reference: Zhao H, Fan X, Yu J, Zhu C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:3490. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b00939.
  • (15).Nicolaou KC, Estrada AA, Freestone GC, Lee SH, Alvarez-Mico X. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:6088. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2007.03.072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16) (a).Surmont R, Verniest G, Thuring JW, Macdonald G, Deroose F, De Kimpe N. J. Org. Chem. 2010;75:930. doi: 10.1021/jo902164z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Fustero S, Báez C, Sánchez-Roselló M, Asensio A, Miro J, del Pozo C. Synthesis. 2012;44:1863. [Google Scholar]
  • (17) (a).Chen Z-H, Wang R-W, Qing F-L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012;53:2171. [Google Scholar]; (b) Tang W, Liu S, Degen D, Ebright RH, Prusov EV. Eur. J. Chem. 2014;20:12310. doi: 10.1002/chem.201403176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhang R, McCarter JD, Braun C, Yeung W, Brayer GD, Withers SG. J. Org. Chem. 2008;73:3070. doi: 10.1021/jo702565q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18) (a).De Schutter C, Pfund E, Lequeux T. Tetrahedron. 2013;69:5920. [Google Scholar]; (b) Hasegawa E, Tateyama M, Nagumo R, Tayama E, Iwamoto H. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013;9:1397. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.9.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Snider BB, Kwon T. J. Org. Chem. 1992;57:2399. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Suppl.

RESOURCES