Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Hematology & Blood Transfusion logoLink to Indian Journal of Hematology & Blood Transfusion
. 2015 Apr 3;32(2):198–201. doi: 10.1007/s12288-015-0535-0

A Study of Anti Beta-2 Glycoprotein I and Anti-Prothrombin Antibodies in Patients with Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Losses

Angad Singh 1,, Anita Nangia 1, Sunita Sharma 1, Manju Puri 2
PMCID: PMC4789006  PMID: 27065583

Abstract

To compare the levels of IgG and IgM anti beta-2 glycoprotein I antibodies and IgG and IgM anti prothrombin antibodies among women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy losses and women with at least 2 live issues. To compare the prevalence of newer anti beta-2 glycoprotein I & anti prothrombin antibodies with conventional Lupus anticoagulant & anticardiolipin antibodies. 50 women with recurrent pregnancy losses & 50 matched controls were evaluated for the presence of: Lupus anticoagulant—screened by LA sensitive aPTT& DRVV and confirmatory Staclot Assay. ELISA kits were used for detecting IgG & IgM anticardiolipin, anti beta-2 glycoprotein I & anti prothrombin antibodies. 11/50 (22 %) women in study group and none in control group had circulating antiphospholipid antibodies. 2 cases (4 %) had lupus anticoagulant. 1 case (2 %) had anticardiolipin antibody & 6 cases (12 %) were positive for anti beta-2 Glycoprotein I antibody (p value = 0.027). 3 cases (6 %) had anti prothrombin antibody. All were mutually exclusive except for one. Women with recurrent pregnancy losses should be tested for anti beta-2 Glycoprotein I antibodies & anti prothrombin antibodies in addition to conventional lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies. This approach can decrease the incidence of SNAP (seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome) cases while establishing the true prevalence of antiphospholipid syndrome.

Keywords: Anticardiolipin, Antiphospholipid syndrome, Lupus coagulation inhibitor, Pregnancy, Prothrombin, Beta 2-glycoprotein I

Introduction

Recurrent pregnancy losses (RPL) are defined as three or more consecutive pregnancy losses with not more than one pregnancy successfully reaching into the third trimester. 1–2 % of women in reproductive age group experience 3 or more pregnancy losses [1, 2]. Pregnancy losses can be attributed to a wide variety of causes but after evaluating patients for the etiology of pregnancy loss and performing all routine investigations, about 50 % of the cases still remain undiagnosed [3]. Immunologic causes are a diagnosis of exclusion. Foremost among them is antiphospholipid syndrome which comprises about 5–20 % cases of recurrent pregnancy loss [4].

Antiphospholipid syndrome is characterised by thromboembolic events, pregnancy losses along with presence of circulating antiphospholipid antibodies. The antiphospholipid antibodies are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies that bind to different protein epitopes (beta-2 glycoprotein I, prothrombin, annexin V etc.) complexed to phospholipids. The two best known antiphospholipid antibodies are lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies. It is diagnosed according to modified Sapporo criteria [5]. It requires presence of any one of three antibodies viz. lupus anticoagulant (LA), anti cardiolipin (aCL) and anti beta-2 glycoprotein I (anti beta-2 GP I) antibody on 2 occasions 12 weeks apart. At present anti prothrombin antibody is not a part of the modified Sapporo criteria. This study aims to compare the presence of anti beta-2 GP I, anti prothrombin antibodies with classical antiphospholipid antibodies (LA, aCL).

Materials and Methods

Place of Study

The study was conducted in the Department of Pathology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College and associated Shrimati Sucheta Kriplani Hospital, New Delhi-110001.

Study Subjects

The case group was formed by 50 women with recurrent pregnancy losses after excluding known patients with Rh/ABO incompatibility, blighted ovum, diabetes mellitus, thyroid disease, positive TORCH/Hepatitis/HIV serology, anatomical defects of uterus on USG, chromosomal anomaly in the participant, spouse or previous abortus/fetus. The control group comprised 50 women with 2 live births and no history of pregnancy loss.

Laboratory Tests

All cases were tested for (a) Routine tests: Complete blood count with peripheral blood smear. (b) Screening tests for coagulation: PT (Prothrombin time) & APTT (Activated partial thromboplastin time) (c) Tests for antiphospholipid antibodies: Lupus anticoagulant (PTT-LA- STACLOT assay & Dilute Russell Viper Venom time screen + confirm STACLOT assay), Anticardiolipin antibody IgG/IgM (ELISA, Asserachrom Diagnostics), Anti Beta-2 Glycoprotein I antibody IgG/IgM (ELISA, Asserachrom Diagnostics), Anti-prothrombin antibody IgG/IgM (ELISA, DRG Diagnostics). A positive test was confirmed by repeat testing after a period of 12 weeks and was considered positive only when both samples were positive.

Statistical Analysis

The data was expressed as mean ± 1 standard deviation. Comparisons between two group frequencies were made using Chi Square Test. For the comparison of two group means, Student t test was applied. When comparing means of more than two parameters, ANOVA (A one-way analysis of variance) test was applied. The statistical software used was SPSS & SS.

Observations and Results

All cases and controls were age matched. The age group ranged from 19 to 30 years with a mean of 24.84 ± 3.026 years for cases and 25.28 ± 2.214 years for controls.

A total of 177 pregnancy losses occurred in 50 Cases of the study group. There was no pregnancy loss among the control group. In the study group all 50/50 (100 %) cases experienced first trimester pregnancy losses while 14/50 (28 %) cases also experienced second trimester pregnancy losses. Only 3/50 (6 %) cases experienced third trimester pregnancy losses while 1 patient had pregnancy losses in all trimesters.

There was no statistically significant difference in the CBC parameters, PT & APTT between study and control groups.

In the study group, overall 11/50 cases were positive for circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (Fig. 1). Of these 2 cases (4 %) were positive for LA & 1 case (2 %) was positive for anticardiolipin antibody. There was no statistically significant difference between study and control groups with respect to LA and anticardiolipin antibodies (Table 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Antiphospholipid antibody positive cases (all figures in percentage)

Table 1.

Cases testing positive for Lupus anticoagulant & anticardiolipin antibody

Cases (n = 50) (Mean ± SD) Controls (n = 50) (Mean ± SD) p value
LA positive 2/50 (4 %) 0/50 0.495
aCL positive 1/50 (2 %) 0/50 1.000

In the study group 6 cases (12 %) tested positive for anti beta-2 GP I antibody, all controls were negative and there was a statistically significant difference (p value < 0.05) between study and control groups (Table 2). A total of 3 cases (6 %) were positive for anti prothrombin antibody while all controls were negative, however p value was not significant (p value > 0.05) (Table 2). A single case showed positivity for both anti beta-2 GP I and anti prothrombin antibody. In the control group all the cases tested negative for lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, anti beta-2 GP I & antiprothrombin antibodies (Table 1, 2).

Table 2.

Cases testing positive for anti Beta-2 GP I & antiprothrombin antibodies

Cases (n = 50) (Mean ± SD) Controls (n = 50) (Mean ± SD) p value
Anti Beta-2 GP I positive 6/50 (12 %) 0/50 0.027
Anti prothrombin positive 3/50 (6 %) 0/50 0.242

Discussion

Antibodies against beta 2 GP I were identified in 1990 by 3 different groups when they found that among the patients of antiphospholipid syndrome, anticardioipin antibodies are directed against a plasma protein cofactor beta 2 glycoprotein I [68]. It has been found that anticardiolipin antibodies which correlate with thrombotic complications and pregnancy losses are actually antibodies which recognise beta 2 GP I and have an affinity for cardiolipin (anticardiolipin dependent beta 2 GP I antibodies) [9]. Antigen/antibody complexes of prothrombin and beta-2 glycoprotein I are largely responsible for the lupus anticoagulant activity detected in in vitro tests for coagulation. These antibodies are responsible for the pathogenic manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome, namely thrombotic events and pregnancy loss [1013].

In our study among 11 antiphospholipid antibody positive women, 9 were negative for commonly used screening tests for the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies i.e. LA (using LA sensitive APTT & Dilute Russell viper venom time) and aCL. Among these 9 cases, 6/9 showed the presence of anti beta-2 GP I antibodies & 3/9 had circulating anti prothrombin antibodies with 1 case showing presence of both anti beta-2 GP I and anti prothrombin antibodies (Fig. 1). Hence 9 LA & aCL negative cases showed the presence of newer antiphospholipid antibodies. In contrast to other studies, in our study all control subjects tested negative for antiphospholipid antibodies. A review of literature shows a widely varying prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss. There is paucity of literature from the Indian subcontinent regarding anti beta-2 GP I & antiprothrombin antibodies. Vora et al. [14] studied 198 women with RPL & found LA positivity in 10.11 % patients, aCL IgM in 19.6 % patients, aCL IgG in 22.2 % cases. Anti Beta-2 GP I IgM was positive in 6.3 % cases, anti beta-2 GP I IgG was positive in 9.7 % cases. Bizzaro et al. [15] studied 77 women with RPL of whom 6 % cases & 4 % controls were positive for anti beta-2 GP I & aCL IgG/IgM antibodies. 16 % cases & 8 % controls were positive for anti prothrombin IgG/IgM antibodies. Zammiti et al. [16] studied 200 women with RPL and found anti beta-2 GP I IgG to be positive in 4.5 % cases, anti beta-2 GP I IgM to be elevated in 1.5 % cases. To the best of our knowledge antiprothrombin antibodies have previously not been studied in Indian females with recurrent pregnancy losses. Sater et al. [17] studied 277 recurrent pregnancy loss cases and compared them with 288 controls. They found 12 % positivity for anti-prothrombin antibodies among cases and also 6.1 % in controls. Marozio et al. [18] studied 56 women with late fetal death (>26 weeks) who were negative for lupus anticoagulants and anticardiolipin. 28.6 % patients tested positive for antiprothrombin antibodies as compared to 3.6 % controls. In patients with seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome with pregnancy loss, Conti et al. [19] found antiprothrombin antibody to be positive in 2 of 8 patients. Recent studies also indicate that Domain I of anti beta-2 glycoprotein I antibodies to be highly associated with antiphospholipid syndrome [20].

Therefore women with recurrent pregnancy losses should be routinely tested for all antiphospholipid antibodies viz. anti beta-2 Glycoprotein I antibodies, anti prothrombin antibodies, lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies. By doing so, we can reduce the diagnosis of seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome. A larger cohort study should be done to find out the true prevalence of anti beta-2 glycoprotein I & antiprothrombin antibodies in patients with recurrent pregnancy losses.

References

  • 1.Whittaker PG, Taylor A, Lind T. Unsuspected pregnancy loss in healthy women. Lancet. 1983;1:1126–1127. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(83)92865-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O’Connor JF, Baird DD, Schlatterer JP, Canfield RE, et al. Incidence of early loss in pregnancy. N Eng J Med. 1988;319:189–194. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198807283190401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lissalde-Lavigne G, Cochery-Nouvellon E, Mercier E, Quéré I, Dauzat M, Marès P, Gris JC. The association between hereditary thrombophilia and pregnancy loss. Haematologica. 2005;90:1223–1230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kumar KS, Jyothy A, Prakash, Rani HS, Reddy PP. Beta2-glycoprotein I dependent anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss. J Postgrad Med. 2002;48:5–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, Cervera R, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:295–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01753.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Galli M, Comfurius P, Maassen C, Hemker HC, et al. Anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) directed not to cardiolipin but to a plasma protein cofactor. Lancet. 1990;335:1544–1547. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91374-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McNeil HP, Simpson RJ, Chesterman CN, Krilis SA. Anti-phospholipid antibodies are directed against a complex antigen that includes a lipid-binding inhibitor of coagulation: beta 2-glycoprotein I (apolipoprotein H) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:4120–4124. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.11.4120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Matsuura E, Igarashi Y, Fujimoto M, Ichikawa K, Koike T. Anticardiolipin cofactor (s) and differential diagnosis of autoimmune disease. Lancet. 1990;336:177–178. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91697-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Philip De Groot. Urbanus Rolf T. The significance of autoantibodies against beta 2 glycoprotein I. Blood. 2012;120(2):266–274. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-378646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bevers EM, Galli M, Barbui T, Comfurius P, Zwaal RF. Lupus anticoagulant IgGs (LA) are not directed to phospholipids only, but to a complex of lipid-bound human prothrombin. Thromb Haemost. 1991;66:629–632. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fleck RA, Rapaport SI, Rao LV. Anti-prothrombin antibodies and the lupus anticoagulant. Blood. 1988;72:512–519. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Permpikul P, Rao LV, Rapaport SI. Functional and binding studies of the roles of prothrombin and beta 2 glycoprotein I in the expression of lupus anticoagulant activity. Blood. 1994;83:2878–2892. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Galli M, Finazzi G, Bevers EM, Barbui T. Kaolin clotting time and dilute Russell’s viper venom time distinguish between prothrombin-dependent and beta 2-glycoprotein I-dependent antiphospholipid antibodies. Blood. 1995;86:617–623. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vora S, Shetty S, Salvi V, Satoskar P, Ghosh K. A comprehensive screening analysis of antiphospholipid antibodies in Indian women with fetal loss. Eur J Rep Biol. 2008;137(2):136–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bizzaro N, Tonutti E, Villalta D, Tampoia M, Tozzoli R. Prevalence and clinical correlation of anti-phospholipid–binding protein antibodies in anticardiolipin-negative patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and women with unexplained recurrent miscarriages. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:61–68. doi: 10.5858/2005-129-61-PACCOA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zammiti W, Mtiraoui N, Kallel C, Mercier E, Almawi WY, Mahjoub T. A case-control study on the association of idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss with autoantibodies against b2-glycoprotein I and annexin V. Reproduction. 2006;131:817–822. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.01060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sater MS, Finan RR, Abu-Hijleh FM, Abu-Hijleh TM, Almawi WY. Anti-phosphatidylserine, anti-cardiolipin, anti-β2 glycoprotein I and anti-prothrombin antibodies in recurrent miscarriage at 8–12 gestational weeks. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;163(2):170–174. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Marozio L, Curti A, Botta G, Canuto EM, Salton L, Tavella AM, Benedetto C. Antiprothrombin antibodies are associated with adverse pregnancy outcome. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011;66:404–409. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.01031.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Conti F, Capozzi A, Truglia S, Lococo E, Longo A, Misasi R, et al. The mosaic of ‘‘Seronegative’’ antiphospholipid syndrome. J Immunol Res. 2014 doi: 10.1155/2014/389601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Andreoli L, Nalli C, Borghi MO, Pregnolato F, Grossi C, Zangola A, et al. Domain I is the main specificity of anti-beta2 GPI in systemic autoimmune diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:S4. doi: 10.1002/acr.21904. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Hematology & Blood Transfusion are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES