Abstract
Births which occurred in Birmingham in 1964-70 were assembled into fraternities by computer linkage. By calculating the frequency with which one birth was followed by another and the interval between births the reproductive behavior of mothers after the birth of a malformed child was compared with that of all mothers, taking account of differences in maternal age, parity, and period of observation. It was found that malformations which resulted in stillbirth or early death were more frequently followed by another birth and that the interval to the following birth was shorter than usual. In this respect malformations did not differ in their effect from other causes of stillbirth and infant death. The birth of children were severe malformations who survived, however, acted as a slight deterrent to further reproduction. The malformation rate among children born after a malformation was double the usual rate; the recurrence rate was particularly high for neural tube defects, 5% of subsequent children being affected. In spite of this parents of children with central nervous system malformations were not deterred from further reproduction unless the affected child survived.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Adelstein A. M. Policies of the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Philosophy and constraints. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1976 Mar;30(1):1–10. doi: 10.1136/jech.30.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Apley J., Barbour R. F., Westmacott I. Impact of congenital heart disease on the family: preliminary report. Br Med J. 1967 Jan 14;1(5532):103–105. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5532.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boon A. R. Tetralogy of Fallot--effect on the family. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1972 Nov;26(4):263–268. doi: 10.1136/jech.26.4.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carter C. O., David P. A., Laurence K. M. A family study of major central nervous system malformations in South Wales. J Med Genet. 1968 Jun;5(2):81–106. doi: 10.1136/jmg.5.2.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hare E. H., Laurence K. M., Payne H., Rawnsley K. Spina bifida cystica and family stress. Br Med J. 1966 Sep 24;2(5516):757–760. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5516.757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hunt G. M. Implications of the treatment of myelomeningocele for the child and his family. Lancet. 1973 Dec 8;2(7841):1308–1310. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)92881-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- POLANI P. E., CAMPBELL M. An aetiological study of congenital heart disease. Ann Hum Genet. 1955 Feb;19(3):209–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1955.tb01345.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richards I. D., McIntosh H. T. Spina bifida survivors and their parents: a study of problems and services. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1973 Jun;15(3):292–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Timson J. Social factors in the incidence of spinal bifida and anencephaly. J Biosoc Sci. 1970 Jan;2(1):81–84. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000007483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walker J. H., Thomas M., Russell I. T. Spina bifida--and the parents. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1971 Aug;13(4):462–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1971.tb03053.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]