Skip to main content
Molecular Genetics and Metabolism Reports logoLink to Molecular Genetics and Metabolism Reports
. 2016 Jan 9;6:16–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2015.12.003

Analysis of body composition and nutritional status in Brazilian phenylketonuria patients

Priscila Nicolao Mazzola a,b, Tatiele Nalin c,, Kamila Castro d, Margreet van Rijn b, Terry GJ Derks b, Ingrid DS Perry e, Alberto Scofano Mainieri f, Ida Vanessa D Schwartz c,g,h
PMCID: PMC4789337  PMID: 27014574

Abstract

Background

Phenylketonuria (PKU) is characterized by phenylalanine (Phe) accumulation to toxic levels due to the low activity of phenylalanine-hydroxylase. PKU patients must follow a Phe-restricted diet, which may put them in risk of nutritional disturbances. Therefore, we aimed to characterize body composition parameters and nutritional status in Brazilian PKU patients also considering their metabolic control.

Methods

Twenty-seven treated PKU patients older than 5 years, and 27 age- and gender-matched controls, were analyzed for anthropometric features and body composition by bioelectrical impedance (BIA). Patients' metabolic control was assessed by historical Phe levels.

Results

There was no effect of PKU type, time of diagnosis, or metabolic control for any analyzed parameter. About 75% of patients and controls were eutrophic, according to their BMI values. There were no difference between groups regarding body composition and other BIA-derived parameters.

Conclusions

Brazilian PKU patients do not show differences in body composition and nutritional status in comparison with controls, regardless metabolic control. Although similar to controls, PKU patients may be in risk of disturbed nutritional and metabolic markers as seen for the general population.

Keywords: Inborn errors of metabolism, Phenylketonuria, Nutritional status, Body composition, Bioelectrical impedance

1. Introduction

Phenylketonuria (PKU, OMIM: 261600) is an inherited metabolic disorder characterized by deficient (mild PKU) to null (classical PKU) activity of the hepatic enzyme phenylalanine (Phe) hydroxylase (PAH, EC 1.14.16.1), which converts Phe into tyrosine. PKU patients show high levels of Phe in the plasma and, consequently, in the brain [1]. Phe in high levels is toxic to the brain; therefore, untreated PKU patients show severe mental retardation. In order to avoid brain damage, patients must be early diagnosed and follow a lifelong Phe-restricted diet. This diet consists of low-Phe foods along with supplementation of an especial l-amino acid mixture [2]. Besides effective in lowering Phe levels, the Phe-restricted diet is hard to accomplish, so that patients may show high Phe levels in plasma reflecting poor dietary control [3], [4], [5], [6].

Both high Phe levels and the dietary treatment may lead to nutritional deficiencies. First, increased levels of Phe have been related to disturbed synthesis of hormones and cytokines, such as catecholamines and adiponectin, thus affecting body metabolism [7], [8]. Moreover, the diet restricts several sources of natural protein, thereby impairing the intake of essential micro- and macronutrients [9]. Finally, the l-amino acid mixture is composed by synthetic nutrients, which may compromise biological availability [4]. Because of those above-mentioned reasons, concern has been emerged on nutritional status [2], linear growth [10], body composition [11], and risk of overweight and obesity in PKU children [12], [13]. Despite that, some studies did not find differences in the growth and body composition parameters in PKU patients compared with controls [14], [15]. Therefore, perhaps the risk of disturbed body composition in PKU just reflects the increased rates of nutritional imbalance as well as overweight and obesity seen in the general population and that varies from country to country. In addition, treatment management of PKU in Brazil needs special attention. In Brazil, the metabolic formula is supplied free of charge by the government, but the commercial low-Phe products are neither easily available nor typically reimbursed by insurance policies [5]. Besides that, the Neonatal Screening for PKU has been organized as a National Public Policy only since 2001, still existing many patients in the country diagnosed at a late age.

Bioelectrical impedance (BIA) represents a useful evaluation of overall body composition and nutritional status in PKU patients, in addition to the commonly analyzed body mass index (BMI). In this way, the BIA-derived data such as body fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) proportion show more accurate values on real tissue mass than BMI estimations [16]. BIA analysis also provides an overview on metabolism and overall cellular integrity by the ratio between extracellular mass and body cell mass (ECM/BCM) and the phase angle (PA), respectively. These BIA-derived values are described as prognostic markers during hospitalization [17] and conditions like post-operative complications [18], kidney dysfunction [19], classical homocystinuria [20], and cancer [21]. In this way, abnormal values of ECM/BCM ratio and/or PA have been related to increased inflammatory processes [22]. Nutritional disturbances such as unbalanced polyunsaturated fatty acid intake [23] and obesity [24] have been related to increased inflammation. Because the PKU treatment seems to compromise the nutritional status in PKU patients, evaluating ECM/BCM ratio and PA can be of value to evaluate nutritional condition in PKU.

The current literature on body composition in PKU is still inconclusive. However, accurate measurements of peripheral markers in PKU patients are important to evaluate nutritional status which, in turn, can improve individual dietary management. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize body composition parameters and nutritional status in Brazilian PKU patients.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants

A cross-sectional study with PKU patients and age- and gender-matched healthy controls was conducted. Patients were recruited at the Medical Genetics Service from the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Brazil. Controls were recruited in a routine follow-up at the Pediatric Service from the same hospital. Inclusion criteria included being aged 5 years or older and being able to lie quietly during the BIA test.

The study has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of HCPA (protocol number 12-0115) and was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines. All subjects or their parents/caregivers signed an informed consent form.

2.2. Patients' characterization

PKU type was defined as mild- or classical PKU according to patients' Phe levels at diagnosis if levels were between 600–1200 μmol/L and > 1200 μmol/L, respectively. Time of diagnosis was defined as early when patients were diagnosed before 60 days of life, and late when diagnosed at 60 days or older. Metabolic control was assessed by the median of historical serum Phe concentrations measured in the previous 12 months, with a minimum of three measurements in that period. Thus, patients were classified as having good metabolic control if those Phe levels were ≤ 360 μmol/L and ≤ 600 μmol/L for patients aged ≤ 12 and > 12 years, respectively; otherwise, patients were classified as having poor metabolic control. All patients were following treatment since diagnosis, and it consisted of having a low-Phe diet and the l-amino acid mixture. No patient was on tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) treatment before or during the study.

2.3. Anthropometric measurements

Height was measured with a wall-mounted stadiometer (Harpenden, Holtain®, Crymych, UK) to the nearest 0.1 cm and weight was obtained using a digital platform scale with a resolution of 0.1 kg (Toledo®, Model 2096PP/2, São Paulo, Brazil), while participants were barefoot and wearing lightweight clothing. BMI was calculated by the quotient between weight (kg) and squared height (m2), and classified into underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese according to WHO 2009 [25].

2.4. BIA analysis

Measurements of body composition such as FM, FFM, ECM/BCM ratio, and PA were performed using a BIA device (Biodynamics 450® version 5.1, Biodynamics Corporation, Seattle, WA, USA) and Resting ECG tab electrodes (Conmed Corporation, Utica, NY, USA) according to previously described standards [26]. Briefly, the participants laid in supine position with arms and legs stretched out and kept from touching the body by non-conductor foam objects to prevent from adduction or crossing of the limbs, which would shorten the electrical circuit and reduce the impedance values. One pair of electrodes was placed on the right wrist and hand and the other on the right ankle and foot of the participant.

2.5. Statistical analysis

The Statistical Package for Social Sciences 19.0 (SPSS® Inc., Chicago, IL) was used. Data were described using absolute and relative frequencies. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Unpaired and paired Student's t-tests were used to compare means of independent variables and to compare means between patients and controls, respectively. Effects of the co-factors were tested by ANOVA. The level of significance was set at 5%.

3. Results

Each group of patients and controls had 27 participants (14 males and 13 females); patients originated from 26 nonrelated families. Concerning PKU type, 14 (52%) patients were mild PKU and 13 (48%) were classical PKU (Table 1). Eleven (41%) patients were early diagnosed and 16 (59%) patients were late diagnosed. Current Phe levels ranged between 102 and 1660 μmol/L while historical Phe levels ranged between 258 and 1482 μmol/L. Regarding treatment adherence, 13 (48%) patients had good metabolic control and 14 (51%) patients had poor metabolic control. The cofactors type of PKU, time of diagnosis, and metabolic control did not affect the anthropometric and BIA-derived measurements; thereby all patients were grouped in a single PKU group for further analyses.

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of the phenylketonuria (PKU) patients.

Patient Age (years) Gender Time of diagnosisa PKU typea Treatment adherencea
#1 6 Male Late Mild Poor
#2 7 Female Late Classical Poor
#3 11 Female Late Mild Poor
#4 11 Female Early Mild Good
#5 11 Male Early Classical Poor
#6 11 Female Late Mild Poor
#7 11 Male Early Mild Poor
#8 11 Female Early Mild Poor
#9 11 Female Late Classical Poor
#10 12 Male Early Classical Poor
#11 12 Male Early Mild Good
#12 12 Female Late Mild Poor
#13 12 Male Late Mild Poor
#14 13 Female Early Classical Poor
#15 13 Female Late Mild Good
#16 14 Male Late Classical Good
#17 14 Female Early Classical Good
#18 14 Female Late Mild Good
#19 15 Male Late Classical Good
#20 16 Female Late Classical Good
#21 16 Male Late Mild Good
#22 16 Male Early Classical Good
#23 17 Male Early Classical Poor
#24 19 Female Late Mild Good
#25 22 Male Early Classical Good
#26 22 Male Late Mild Good
#27 25 Male Late Classical Poor
a

See the text for details on classification.

No differences were found between PKU patients and controls regarding body composition, including the BIA-derived parameters FM, FFM, ECM/BCM ratio, and PA (Table 2). Three patients and three controls were below the cutoff values for PA (− 3.2%, − 14.3%, − 17.4%, and − 2.4%, − 2.8%, − 4.4%, respectively) according to Bosy-Westphal et al. [27] and Barbosa-Silva and Barros [18].

Table 2.

Anthropometrics and bioelectrical impedance parameters of phenylketonuria (PKU) patients and controls.

PKU Controls p value
Weight (kg) 47.93 ± 15.99 51.52 ± 18.15 NS
Height (m) 1.52 ± 0.14 1.54 ± 0.17 NS
BMI (kg/m2) 20 ± 4 21 ± 4 NS
BMI classificationa (n) NS
 Underweight 1 (4%) 0 (0%)
 Normal weight 20 (74%) 18 (67%)
 Overweight 4 (15%) 6 (22%)
 Obese 2 (7%) 3 (11%)
Fat mass (%) 20 ± 7 22 ± 9 NS
Free-fat mass (%) 80 ± 7 78 ± 9 NS
ECM/BCM ratio 1.05 ± 0.08 1.04 ± 0.10 NS
Phase angle (°) 6.22 ± 0.86 6.33 ± 1.05 NS

BMI, body mass index; ECM/BCM, extracellular mass/body cell mass; NS, non-significant. Fat mass and fat-free mass are expressed as percentage of total body weight. Data are expressed as mean ± SD or frequency (percentage); n = 27/group.

a

According to WHO 2009. See the text for details on statistics.

4. Discussion

This is the first study evaluating the body composition of Brazilian PKU patients, which represent a heterogeneous cohort of patients that differs from those from Europe and USA in terms of diagnosis, treatment, and ethnicity. First, the proportion of late-diagnosed patients in Brazil is still high, since the mandatory Neonatal Screening Program was implemented in 2001 in Brazil. Moreover, Brazilian PKU patients, although having access to the l-amino acid mixture, do not have access to protein-enriched low-Phe food, a fact that could compromise their nutritional status. Finally, Brazil is essentially a mixed country with several ethnic backgrounds. In this way, patients with different PKU types, time of diagnosis, and treatment adherence were included in our study, therefore these factors were also taken into account in the analysis of our results. Even though BIA analysis gives more accurate values on body composition than overall measurements such as BMI [16], our study did not find differences between patients and controls regarding anthropometric features evaluated by both methods. Therefore, our main findings pointed out that patients and controls were similar in body composition parameters, despite PKU type, time of diagnosis, and metabolic control. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that evaluated several markers on body composition in a heterogeneous group of PKU patients using BIA analysis.

Overweight has been pointed out as an issue for PKU patients, although this is not a consensus in the literature (Table 3). This disagreement in the literature may be caused by a lack of control for the puberty status of patients, since most studies, including ours, evaluate pre- and post-pubertal patients in a single group. In this way, some studies have found that PKU patients, especially females, show higher BMI and fat mass than controls [11], [12]. On the other hand, several authors have not found differences in body composition between patients and age-matched controls [14], [15], [28], [29], [30] as well as comparing patients' outcomes to reference values [31], [32], [33], [34]. In our study, the majority of patients and controls showed to be eutrophic regarding their BMI values. Moreover, no differences in body composition were found between patients and controls. Although not at higher risk of developing obesity, PKU patients may show the same risk of having disturbed body composition as the general population. Then, it is important to highlight that Brazil is undergoing an epidemiological transition associated with demographic and nutritional changes, which has led to high prevalence of obesity especially for the age group and geographic area covered by our study [35], [36].

Table 3.

Review of literature on studies regarding body composition in early treated phenylketonuria (PKU) patients.

Authors/location Controlled Number (n)/age Type of PKU Method Body fat mass Body fat-free mass ECM/BCM Phase angle
Das et al. (2014)
Germany [31]
Noa 51
27 ± 7 (range 16–44)
Classical BIA Normal Normal Normal Normal
Doulgeraki et al. (2014)
Greece [28]
Yes 80
10 ± 3 (range 5–18)
Mild, classical DXA No difference No difference N/E N/E
Rocha et al. (2013); Rocha et al. (2012)
Portugal [15], [30]
Yes 89
14 ± 7
HPA, mild, classical BIA No difference No difference N/E No difference
Douglas et al. (2013)
USA [34]
Noa 59 (range 10–19) Classical ADP Normal N/E N/E N/E
Adamczyk et al. (2010)
Poland [33]
Noa 45
14 ± 5
Classical DXA Normal Normal N/E N/E
Albersen et al. (2010)
The Netherlands [11]
Yes 20
median 10 (range 6–16)
Classical ADP Higher in patients N/E N/E N/E
Huemer et al. (2007)
Austria [14]
Yes 34
8.7 ± 3.9 (range 0.2–15)
Classical TOBEC No difference No difference N/E N/E
Dobbelaere et al. (2003)
France [32]
Noa 20
4.5 ± 1.6 (range 0.7–7)
Classical BIA Normal Normal N/E N/E
Allen et al. (1995)
Australia [29]
Yes 30
10 ± 3
Classical Skinfold-thickness No difference No difference N/E N/E

ECM/BCM, extracellular mass/body cell mass ratio; HPA, hyperphenylalaninemia; DXA, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; BIA, bioelectrical impedance; ADP, air displacement plethysmography; TOBEC, total body electrical conductivity; N/E, not evaluated. Values of age are shown as mean ± SD if not stated otherwise.

a

Non-controlled study that compared the results from patients with reference values.

BIA analysis provides a range of data that assesses overall nutritional status such as relative active tissue (ECM/BCM ratio) and cellular integrity (PA), which can be of interest to PKU patients. In our study, values of ECM/BCM ratio and PA were similar between patients and controls. In agreement with our results, Rocha et al. [15] have found similar PA and body cell mass index values between Portuguese PKU patients and controls. In other pathologic conditions, ECM/BCM ratio has positively correlated with risk of death in dialysis patients [19], while PA has been negatively affected by nutritional imbalances, thus used as a prognostic factor in patients with homocystinuria [20] and cancer [21]. Both ECM/BCM ratio and PA values have been related to increased inflammation [17], [18], [19], [21], which are seen in several pathological processes including in PKU patients [37], [38]. Because nutritional imbalances have shown to underlie increased inflammation [23], [24], the Phe-restricted diet could represent a threat to the overall health of patients. In addition, Brazilian PKU patients do not have adequate insurance coverage for commercial low-Phe products [2], [5], [6], which compromises the adherence to the dietary treatment. Despite that, the PKU patients of our study were not in higher risk of nutritional disturbances than the general population.

5. Conclusions

Overall, our results pointed to similar values of body composition and nutritional parameters between PKU patients and controls. Moreover, the analyzed values were not affected by the PKU type, time of diagnosis, or metabolic control.

Abbreviations

ADP

air displacement plethysmography

BCM

body cell mass

BIA

bioelectrical impedance

BMI

body mass index

DXA

dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

ECM

extracellular mass

FFM

fat-free mass

FM

fat mass

HPA

hyperphenylalaninemia

N/E

not evaluated

NS

non-significant

PA

phase angle

PAH

phenylalanine hydroxylase

Phe

phenylalanine

PKU

phenylketonuria

TOBEC

total body electrical conductivity

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests relevant for this manuscript. In addition, in the last 5 years, TGJD had received speaker's fees from Recordati Rare Diseases, Danone Nutricia and Vitaflo, and research fees from Sigma Tau and Vitaflo.

Authors' contributions

TN, KC, and ASM collected the data. KC, TN, and IDSP performed the statistical analyses. KC, TN, IDSP, and PNM drafted the manuscript. All authors participated in the study design, contributed to the interpretation of the results and revised the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank Taika I. Brandorff and Petra M. G. Brusschers for their contribution in collecting the data. This study received financial support from FIPE/HCPA (Research Incentive Fund — Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, grant number 12-0115) and the UMC Groningen (Mandema Stipend to TGJD, grant number Man-081219-802).

Contributor Information

Priscila Nicolao Mazzola, Email: pku@priscilamazzola.com.

Tatiele Nalin, Email: tatinalin@gmail.com.

Kamila Castro, Email: kamilacastro@hotmail.com.br.

Margreet van Rijn, Email: m.van.rijn@umcg.nl.

Terry G.J. Derks, Email: t.g.j.derks@umcg.nl.

Ingrid D.S. Perry, Email: atputp@gmail.com.

Alberto Scofano Mainieri, Email: mainieri.alberto@gmail.com.

Ida Vanessa D. Schwartz, Email: ischwartz@hcpa.edu.br.

References

  • 1.Scriver C.R., Kaufman S. Hyperphenylalaninemia: phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency. In: Scriver C.R., Beaudet A.L., Sly W.S., Walle D., editors. The Metabolic & Molecular Inherited Disease. McGraw-Hill; New York: 2001. pp. 1667–1724. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Camp K.M., Parisi M.A., Acosta P.B., Berry G.T., Bilder D.A., Blau N., Bodamer O.A., Brosco J.P., Brown C.S., Burlina A.B., Burton B.K., Chang C.S., Coates P.M., Cunningham A.C., Dobrowolski S.F., Ferguson J.H., Franklin T.D., Frazier D.M., Grange D.K., Greene C.L., Groft S.C., Harding C.O., Howell R.R., Huntington K.L., Hyatt-Knorr H.D., Jevaji I.P., Levy H.L., Lichter-Konecki U., Lindegren M.L., Lloyd-Puryear M.A., Matalon K., MacDonald A., McPheeters M.L., Mitchell J.J., Mofidi S., Moseley K.D., Mueller C.M., Mulberg A.E., Nerurkar L.S., Ogata B.N., Pariser A.R., Prasad S., Pridjian G., Rasmussen S.A., Reddy U.M., Rohr F.J., Singh R.H., Sirrs S.M., Stremer S.E., Tagle D.A., Thompson S.M., Urv T.K., Utz J.R., van Spronsen F., Vockley J., Waisbren S.E., Weglicki L.S., White D.A., Whitley C.B., Wilfond B.S., Yannicelli S., Young J.M. Phenylketonuria Scientific Review Conference: state of the science and future research needs. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2014;112:87–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2014.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vilaseca M.A., Lambruschini N., Gomez-Lopez L., Gutierrez A., Fuste E., Gassio R., Artuch R., Campistol J. Quality of dietary control in phenylketonuric patients and its relationship with general intelligence. Nutr. Hosp. 2010;25:60–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.MacDonald A., Rocha J.C., van Rijn M., Feillet F. Nutrition in phenylketonuria. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2011;104:S10–S18. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.08.023. (Suppl) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Trevisan L.M., Nalin T., Tonon T., Veiga L.M., Vargas P., Krug B.C., Leivas P.G., Schwartz I.V. Access to treatment for phenylketonuria by judicial means in Rio Grande do Sul. Braz. Cienc. Saude Colet. 2015;20:1607–1616. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232015205.08302014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vieira T.A., Nalin T., Krug B.C., Bittar C.M., Netto C.B.O., Schwartz I.V.D. Adherence to treatment of phenylketonuria: a study in southern Brazilian patients. J. Inborn Errors Metab. Screen. 2015;3:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schulpis K.H., Papassotiriou I., Vounatsou M., Karikas G.A., Tsakiris S., Chrousos G.P. Morning preprandial plasma ghrelin and catecholamine concentrations in patients with phenylketonuria and normal controls: evidence for catecholamine-mediated ghrelin regulation. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004;89:3983–3987. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schulpis K.H., Papassotiriou I., Tsakiris S., Vounatsou M., Chrousos G.P. Increased plasma adiponectin concentrations in poorly controlled patients with phenylketonuria normalize with a strict diet: evidence for catecholamine-mediated adiponectin regulation and a complex effect of phenylketonuria diet on atherogenesis risk factors. Metabolism. 2005;54:1350–1355. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2005.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rocha J.C., Macdonald A., Trefz F. Is overweight an issue in phenylketonuria? Mol. Genet. Metab. 2013;110(Suppl):S18–S24. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Arnold G.L., Vladutiu C.J., Kirby R.S., Blakely E.M., Deluca J.M. Protein insufficiency and linear growth restriction in phenylketonuria. J. Pediatr. 2002;141:243–246. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.126455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Albersen M., Bonthuis M., de Roos N.M., van den Hurk D.A., Carbasius Weber E., Hendriks M.M., de Sain-van der Velden M.G., de Koning T.J., Visser G. Whole body composition analysis by the BodPod air-displacement plethysmography method in children with phenylketonuria shows a higher body fat percentage. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2010;33(Suppl. 3):S283–S288. doi: 10.1007/s10545-010-9149-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Burrage L.C., McConnell J., Haesler R., O'Riordan M.A., Sutton V.R., Kerr D.S., McCandless S.E. High prevalence of overweight and obesity in females with phenylketonuria. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2012;107:43–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Robertson L.V., McStravick N., Ripley S., Weetch E., Donald S., Adam S., Micciche A., Boocock S., MacDonald A. Body mass index in adult patients with diet-treated phenylketonuria. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2013;26(Suppl. 1):1–6. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Huemer M., Huemer C., Moslinger D., Huter D., Stockler-Ipsiroglu S. Growth and body composition in children with classical phenylketonuria: results in 34 patients and review of the literature. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2007;30:694–699. doi: 10.1007/s10545-007-0549-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rocha J.C., van Spronsen F.J., Almeida M.F., Ramos E., Guimaraes J.T., Borges N. Early dietary treated patients with phenylketonuria can achieve normal growth and body composition. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2013;110:S40–S43. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.10.009. (Suppl) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Roubenoff R., Dallal G.E., Wilson P.W. Predicting body fatness: the body mass index vs estimation by bioelectrical impedance. Am. J. Public Health. 1995;85:726–728. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.5.726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kyle U.G., Soundar E.P., Genton L., Pichard C. Can phase angle determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis assess nutritional risk? A comparison between healthy and hospitalized subjects. Clin. Nutr. 2012;31:875–881. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Barbosa-Silva M.C., Barros A.J. Bioelectric impedance and individual characteristics as prognostic factors for post-operative complications. Clin. Nutr. 2005;24:830–838. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Avram M.M., Fein P.A., Borawski C., Chattopadhyay J., Matza B. Extracellular mass/body cell mass ratio is an independent predictor of survival in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int. Suppl. 2010:S37–S40. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Poloni S., Schweigert Perry I.D., D'Almeida V., Schwartz I.V. Does phase angle correlate with hyperhomocysteinemia? A study of patients with classical homocystinuria. Clin. Nutr. 2013;32:479–480. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Paiva S.I., Borges L.R., Halpern-Silveira D., Assuncao M.C., Barros A.J., Gonzalez M.C. Standardized phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis as prognostic factor for survival in patients with cancer. Support. Care Cancer. 2010;19:187–192. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0798-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kyle U.G., Earthman C.P., Pichard C., Coss-Bu J.A. Body composition during growth in children: limitations and perspectives of bioelectrical impedance analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015 doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Simopoulos A.P. The importance of the ratio of omega-6/omega-3 essential fatty acids. Biomed. Pharmacother.Biomed. Pharmacother. 2002;56:365–379. doi: 10.1016/s0753-3322(02)00253-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gregor M.F., Hotamisligil G.S. Inflammatory mechanisms in obesity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2011;29:415–445. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.WHO . World Health Organization (WHO); Geneva, Switzerland: 2009. WHO AnthroPlus for personal computers Manual: software for assessing growth of the world's children and adolescents. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kyle U.G., Bosaeus I., De Lorenzo A.D., Deurenberg P., Elia M., Gomez J.M., Heitmann B.L., Kent-Smith L., Melchior J.C., Pirlich M., Scharfetter H., Schols A.M., Pichard C., Composition of the E.W.G. Bioelectrical impedance analysis—part I: review of principles and methods. Clin. Nutr. 2004;23:1226–1243. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bosy-Westphal A., Danielzik S., Dorhofer R.P., Later W., Wiese S., Muller M.J. Phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis: population reference values by age, sex, and body mass index JPEN. J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2006;30:309–316. doi: 10.1177/0148607106030004309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Doulgeraki A., Skarpalezou A., Theodosiadou A., Monopolis I., Schulpis K. Body composition profile of young patients with phenylketonuria and mild hyperphenylalaninemia. Int. J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;12:e16061. doi: 10.5812/ijem.16061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Allen J.R., McCauley J.C., Waters D.L., O'Connor J., Roberts D.C., Gaskin K.J. Resting energy expenditure in children with phenylketonuria. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995;62:797–801. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/62.4.797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rocha J.C., van Spronsen F.J., Almeida M.F., Soares G., Quelhas D., Ramos E., Guimaraes J.T., Borges N. Dietary treatment in phenylketonuria does not lead to increased risk of obesity or metabolic syndrome. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2012;107:659–663. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Das A.M., Goedecke K., Meyer U., Kanzelmeyer N., Koch S., Illsinger S., Lucke T., Hartmann H., Lange K., Lanfermann H., Hoy L., Ding X.Q. Dietary habits and metabolic control in adolescents and young adults with phenylketonuria: self-imposed protein restriction may be harmful. JIMD Rep. 2014;13:149–158. doi: 10.1007/8904_2013_273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dobbelaere D., Michaud L., Debrabander A., Vanderbecken S., Gottrand F., Turck D., Farriaux J.P. Evaluation of nutritional status and pathophysiology of growth retardation in patients with phenylketonuria. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2003;26:1–11. doi: 10.1023/a:1024063726046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Adamczyk P., Morawiec-Knysak A., Pludowski P., Banaszak B., Karpe J., Pluskiewicz W. Bone metabolism and the muscle–bone relationship in children, adolescents and young adults with phenylketonuria. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2011;29:236–244. doi: 10.1007/s00774-010-0216-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Douglas T.D., Kennedy M.J., Quirk M.E., Yi S.H., Singh R.H. Accuracy of six anthropometric skinfold formulas versus air displacement plethysmography for estimating percent body fat in female adolescents with phenylketonuria. JIMD Rep. 2013;10:23–31. doi: 10.1007/8904_2012_196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Popkin B.M. The nutrition transition and its health implications in lower-income countries. Public Health Nutr. 1998;1:5–21. doi: 10.1079/phn19980004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fleischer N.L., Diez Roux A.V., Alazraqui M., Spinelli H., De Maio F. Socioeconomic gradients in chronic disease risk factors in middle-income countries: evidence of effect modification by urbanicity in Argentina. Am. J. Public Health. 2011;101:294–301. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.190165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gunduz M., Cakar S., Kuyum P., Makay B., Arslan N. Comparison of atherogenic risk factors among poorly controlled and well-controlled adolescent phenylketonuria patients. Cardiol. Young. 2015:1–8. doi: 10.1017/S104795111500150X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Deon M., Sitta A., Faverzani J.L., Guerreiro G.B., Donida B., Marchetti D.P., Mescka C.P., Ribas G.S., Coitinho A.S., Wajner M., Vargas C.R. Urinary biomarkers of oxidative stress and plasmatic inflammatory profile in phenylketonuric treated patients. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2015;47:259–265. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2015.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Genetics and Metabolism Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES