Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 2004 Aug;78(16):8788–8798. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.16.8788-8798.2004

Human Endogenous Retrovirus Family HERV-K(HML-5): Status, Evolution, and Reconstruction of an Ancient Betaretrovirus in the Human Genome†

Laurence Lavie 1, Patrik Medstrand 2, Werner Schempp 3, Eckart Meese 1, Jens Mayer 1,*
PMCID: PMC479102  PMID: 15280487

Abstract

The human genome harbors numerous distinct families of so-called human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) which are remnants of exogenous retroviruses that entered the germ line millions of years ago. We describe here the hitherto little-characterized betaretrovirus HERV-K(HML-5) family (named HERVK22 in Repbase) in greater detail. Out of 139 proviruses, only a few loci represent full-length proviruses, and many lack gag protease and/or env gene regions. We generated a consensus sequence from multiple alignment of 62 HML-5 loci that displays open reading frames for the four major retroviral proteins. Four HML-5 long terminal repeat (LTR) subfamilies were identified that are associated with monophyletic proviral bodies, implying different evolution of HML-5 LTRs and genes. Sequence analysis indicated that the proviruses formed approximately 55 million years ago. Accordingly, HML-5 proviral sequences were detected in Old World and New World primates but not in prosimians. No recent activity is associated with this HERV family. We also conclude that the HML-5 consensus sequence primer binding site is identical to methionine tRNA. Therefore, the family should be designated HERV-M. Our study provides important insights into the structure and evolution of the oldest betaretrovirus in the primate genome known to date.

Approximately 8% of the human genome is derived from retrovirus-like elements termed endogenous retroviruses (ERV) (14). Most of them are likely remnants of exogenous retrovirus infection of the germ line which became fixed in the population millions of years ago. Intracellular retrotransposition events increased proviral copy number during evolution, resulting in the presence of a few to several thousand proviruses belonging to various ERV families. A variety of distinct human ERV (HERV) families have been identified, suggesting that the germ line was invaded by various exogenous retroviruses (23, 25, 41). The human genome was recently estimated to contain 30 to 50 distinct HERV families (11). About 100 different HERV sequences are defined in Repbase, a widely employed reference sequence database for repetitive elements (15). Unfortunately, there is no established nomenclature for HERV. We follow here a nomenclature that uses the single-letter amino acid code of the tRNA complementary to the primer binding site formerly used to prime reverse transcription. Accordingly, HERV-K denotes a number of HERV families having a lysine tRNA-like primer binding site. Phylogenetic analysis of HERV reverse transcriptase sequences have identified 10 HERV-K families in the human genome which were termed human MMTV-like (HML-1 to HML-10) because of homologies to the betaretrovirus mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) (1, 32). Repbase Update also lists 10 HERV-K families.

Structurally intact ERV contain gag, protease (prt), polymerase (pol), and envelope (env) genes and are flanked by long terminal repeats (LTRs). Two HERV families, HERV-K(HML-2) and HERV-W, contain intact open reading frames (ORFs) and encode functional proteins (2, 3, 18, 27, 29, 31, 36). Further proviral sequences with Env coding capacity were identified recently (9). Most HERV sequences are coding deficient because they accumulated a variety of mutations and deletions since provirus formation. The vast majority of HERV are present in the genome only as solitary LTRs due to homologous recombination between 5′ and 3′ LTRs.

Many HERV families were fixed in Old World primates after their evolutionary split from New World primates about 35 million years ago (41). For example, the HERV-K families HML-2, HML-3, and HML-6 were all found in Old World monkeys but missing in New World primates. The HERV-K(HML-2) family seems to be relatively long-lived in the genome, displaying transpositional activity since its appearance in the primate lineage up till after the human-chimpanzee split (7, 28, 33, 38). In contrast, other ERV families are short-lived. In the case of the HERV-K(HML-3) family, no activity in terms of provirus formation was indicated in the human evolutionary lineage over the last 30 million years (26). To date, only a few HERV families have been characterized in greater detail. Here we characterize the HERV-K(HML-5) family by analyzing proviruses in the human genome. We find that the HML-5 proviruses have an older origin than other betaretroviruses in the human genome, and we reconstruct a putative full-length coding-competent ancient betaretrovirus which targeted the primate germ line more than 50 million years ago.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HERV-K(HML-5) sequence retrieval.

HERV-K(HML-5) proviruses (LTR22A/HERVK22/LTR22A; Repbase version 8.2.0 consensus sequences) were identified by downloading the human sequence specified as HERVK22 in the RepeatMasker annotation of the June 2002 (hg12) UCSC genome browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu/). We performed dot matrix comparisons between each proviral sequence using MacVector (Accelrys Inc.) with default settings. We identified boundaries between HERV-K(HML-5) proviral loci and flanking cellular sequences and the location of nonretroviral repetitive elements within the proviral portions by using RepeatMasker (provided by A. F. A. Smit and P. Green; RepeatMasker at http://www.repeatmasker.org). We subsequently removed LTRs and apparent non-HERV-K(HML-5) sequences.

Multiple alignment of HERV-K(HML-5) sequences and consensus sequence generation.

We produced multiple alignments of HERV-K(HML-5) proviral sequences displaying a minimal size of 3 kb (after deletion of other repetitive elements). Multiple alignments were generated employing DIALIGN2 (35) provided by the Institut Pasteur web server (http://bioweb.pasteur.fr) or employing ClustalW (42) using default settings. We further optimized alignments by hand-operating the Se-Al program (provided by Andrew Rambaut; http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/). Consensus sequences, generated by the Boxshade program at the Institut Pasteur, were further evaluated and corrected manually. The resulting proviral sequence was analyzed for encoded retroviral proteins and conserved domains employing BlastP and CD-search at the National Center for Biotechnology Information.

Phylogenetic analysis.

We employed PAUP* (Sinauer Associates) and the PHYLIP package (10), the latter provided by the Institut Pasteur web server, for phylogenetic analysis. The above programs generated multiple alignment of LTR sequences, and several regions from the multiple alignment of proviral body regions were subjected to neighbor-joining analysis. Nucleotide distances were corrected according to the Kimura-2-parameter model (17). Gaps and ambiguous positions were excluded from analysis. Sequences obtained from various primate species were included in the respective multiple alignment portions of human sequences and were analyzed similarly.

Evolutionary age of proviruses.

Approximate integration times of HERV-K(HML-5) proviruses displaying almost full-length LTRs on both sides were estimated by determination of Kimura-2-parameter corrected nucleotide distances between 5′ and 3′ LTRs of particular proviruses by employing PAUP*. Proviral age (T) was estimated according to the following formula: T = D/(2 · 0.13), where D is the nucleotide divergence between the 2 LTR sequences and 0.13 is the estimated average substitution rate per nucleotide and million years (8, 19). The factor 2 considers that both LTRs diverged independently from each other.

Test for HERV-K(HML-5) homologous sequences in primate species.

PCR primers corresponding to the 5′ portion of the gag gene (P1, 5′-AACAGTATATAAAAGTATTGAAACA-3′; and P2, 5′-TGCTTTTTCTTATCTCTTTATAAG-3′) and the env gene (P3, 5′-CCATTCACTCCAGATAATTTGT-3′; and P4, 5′-TTCTTTTCCAATCAAGGAGTGA-3′) within the HERV-K(HML-5) consensus sequence were used to amplify HERV-K(HML-5) proviruses from human and various other primate species genomic DNAs, together comprising four primate clades: Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Hylobates lar, Colobus guereza, Mandrillus sphinx, Macaca mulatta, Saimiri sciureus, Callithrix jacchus, Alouatta seniculus, and Nycticebus coucang. Genomic DNA (100 ng each) was subjected to PCR with 1 μM primers and 2.5 U of Taq polymerase (Invitrogen Inc.) in a final volume of 25 μl. PCR cycling conditions for gag and env amplification were as follows: 5 min at 94°C; 35 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 45 s at 54°C, and 2 min at 72°C; 5 min at 72°C. PCR products for the gag region obtained from P. troglodytes, H. lar, M. mulatta, and A. seniculus were cloned into the pGEM-T vector (Promega). Sequences for both DNA strands were obtained using a SequiTherm Excel II DNA sequencing kit-LC (Biozym) and an automated DNA sequencer (Licor 4000-L; MWG). Raw sequence data were analyzed using the Sequencher software (Gene Codes Corp.).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

We deposited the updated HERV-K(HML-5)/HERVK22 and LTR22 consensus sequences in Repbase.

RESULTS

Identification and structure of HERV-K(HML-5) proviruses.

By using the annotation within the UCSC genome browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu/), we identified 139 HML-5 proviruses in the human genome. Twenty-three out of 139 (16.5%) loci were located on the Y chromosome, whereas other loci seemed randomly distributed along autosomes. We next performed dot matrix comparisons between proviral loci and the Repbase consensus sequences (LTR22A/HERVK22/LTR22A) to examine proviral structures in more detail. We generated schematic structures of 100 out of 139 HML-5 sequences (Fig. 1). We did not include 39 of the proviruses because those proviral sequences were heavily mutated due to integration of other repetitive elements, deletions, duplications, and/or inversions. The majority (123 proviruses) displayed larger deletions of retroviral genes: only 11 proviruses displayed a complete gag gene, 12 a complete prt gene, 45 a complete pol gene, and 15 a complete env gene. Among those, multiple sequences commonly displayed large deletions of about 1,410 and 1,320 bp within either the gag-prt junction or the env region, respectively, or in both. The first deletion removed a large portion of the 5′ part of the gag gene and the complete prt gene, and the second deletion removed a large central part of the env gene (Fig. 1). Sixteen proviruses were intact regarding the presence of retroviral genes, and nine of these resembled full-length proviral structures having LTRs on both sides flanking the putative coding regions.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Open in a new tab

Structures of 100 HERV-K(HML-5) provirus sequences. An ORF map of the HERV-K(HML-5) consensus sequence generated in this study, including retroviral gag, prt, pol, and env reading frames and protein domains, is shown at the top. Structures of proviral sequences with regard to the consensus sequence are depicted below, with horizontal lines indicating the presence of respective proviral portions. Numbers to the right refer to proviral locus numbers given in Table 1. Proviruses 117, 133, and 136 probably stem from genomic duplication events and are therefore summarized in one line. Non-HERV-K(HML-5) insertions, such as Alu or L1 elements, present in some proviruses were excluded from the figure. Note that the majority of sequences display two commonly deleted regions within the gag-prt and the env genes, indicated by vertical dotted lines. Some sequences only comprise 5′ or 3′ portions. For gag-prt, 5′ and 3′ deletion points clustered between nt 768 to 960 and nt 2061 to 2319, respectively (52% being located at nt 768 and nt 2303). For env, clusters ranged from nt 5256 to 6328 and nt 6568 to 6641 (75% located at nt 5314 and 68% at nt 6641). The thick black lines numbered 1 through 5 indicate regions in the multiple sequence alignment for which phylogenetic analysis was performed. RT, reverse transcriptase.

Reconstruction of a coding-competent HML-5 provirus.

Before multiple sequence alignment of HML-5 sequences, we employed RepeatMasker to identify and to subsequently delete non-HML-5 sequences from proviral sequence entries. A greater number of proviruses contained one or several other repetitive elements which likely integrated into the proviruses at different stages during primate evolution. L1 elements from the M1, P, and PA2-6 subfamilies and Alu elements from the Y, Yc, Ya5, Yb9, Sp, Sc, and Sg subfamilies were recognized (4, 16, 40). Furthermore, numerous LTR elements annotated in Repbase as LTR5B, -6A, -7, -7B, -10F, -12, -12B, -12C, -15, -17, -19, -30, and MER11C (15) were found (Table 1). We chose 62 proviral sequence entries with the least deletions for multiple alignment. By using Boxshade and subsequent visual correction, we generated a HML-5 consensus sequence from the alignment. The sequence displayed a total length of 6,824 bp and was 4% divergent in sequence compared to the HERVK22 consensus sequence present in Repbase. Several nucleotide differences adjusted reading frames with regard to the Repbase sequence. Two 1-bp and an 11-bp insertion were introduced into the 5′ intergenic region. A 3-bp sequence was introduced, and 2 and 1 bp were removed in the gag, prt, and pol gene regions, respectively. In addition, a stop codon within the prt gene and three stop codons within pol could be corrected.

TABLE 1.

HERV-K(HML-5) loci investigated in this studya

No. Chr. band Size (bp) Accession no. Repeats No. Chr. band Size (bp) Accession no. Repeats
1 1p35.2 829 AL662906.4(104050-104880)+ 72* 4q32.1 6,276 AC107056.5(8220-14493)+
2* 1p22.2 3,721 AC019187.3(10111-13833)− 73* 5p14.3 3,537 AC026722.4(96454-99985)+
3* 1q22 5,409 AL135927.14(71991-77401)+ AluSp/AluYa5 74 5p14.1 662 AC027333.5(168790-169434)+
4 1q23.1 12,084 AL359753.9(44427-56512)+ L1PA2/L1PA3 75* 5p13.2 7,877 AC008925.4(50885-58763)+ AluY
5* 1q25.3 5,167 AL133383.10(88786-93954)+ 76* 5q33.1 2,096 AC022106.5(50979-53076)+
6 1q31.3 651 AL592144.5(148187-148839)+ 77* 6p22.3 7,742 AL591416.4(97763-105506)+
7* 1q32.1 2,719 AL359837.21(112252-114972)+ 78* 6p22.2 3,242 AL031777.5(62600-65843)+
8* 1q32.1 2,718 AC022000.1(57476-60195)+ 79* 6p21.32 7,287 AL645931.7(57633-64454)+
9* 1q42.12 7,611 AL162738,12(4411-12023)+ LTR12/LTR30/LTR58 80 6p21.32 136 AL645931.7(64451-64588)+
10* 1q43 5,604 AL591686.9(118293-123898)+ AluY 81* 6p21.31 1,922 AL138721.16(57057-58972)+ AluSg (in 5′ LTR)
11 10q11.21 5,689 AC068707.6(109183-114873)+ AluSp 82* 6p12.3 4,531 AL359458.17(66575-71107)+
12 11q12.1 5,134 AP001652.4(156224-161359)+ 83* 6p12.1 4,889 AL450489.12(45284-50174)+
13* 11q14.1 7,752 AP003398.2(153858-156829)+ 84* 6q12 5,251 AL078597.11(46513-51765)+ AluY (in LTR)
14* 11q21 6,698 AP000870.4(65492-72191)+ AluY 85* 6q14.1 7,151 AL391843.13(673-7825)+
15* 11q22.1 4,878 AP003403.2(164665-169544)+ 86* 6q14.3 4,494 AL357272.10(14829-19324)+
16 11q22.1 771 AP000798.4(44733-45495)+ 87* 6q16.3 7,830 AL161720.15(12037-19868)+ AluY
17 11q22.1 603 AP000798.4(45495-46081)+ 88* 7p14.1 4,097 AC073068.8(158047-162145)+
18* 12p13.31 4,026 AC092746.9(16238-20258)− 89 7p14.1 640 AC 72061.8(15984-16579)+
19 12p13.31 242 AC092746.9(13074-13317)− 90* 7q21.11 1,619 AC096562.1(41174-42804)+
20* 12q12 4,957 AC079601.22(79916-84874)− 91 7q22.3 5,307 AC004855.1(66147-71455)+
21* 12q12 4,887 AC076972.16(29993-34881)− 92* 7q31.31 7,753 AC004536.1(33287-41051)+
22 12q15 4,267 AC020656.30(52510-56778)+ LTR7B (in 5′ LTR) 93* 8p23.2 5,113 AC087369.5(90669-95783)−
23* 12q21.32 4,966 AC087865.8(151169-156136)+ 94* 8p23.2 5,043 AC087369.5(36733-41775)−
24 12q22 5,220 AC018475.27(165538-170759)− LTR30/LTR12/LTR128 95* 8P23.2 5,819 AC087369.5(14280-20100)−
25* 12q23.1 6,091 AC010203.13(53087-59179)− 96* 8p23.1 6,272 AC055869.4(23969-27126)+ AluY/LTR7/HERV-H
26* 12q24.31 3,930 AC005858.1(7141-11072)+ 97* 8p21.2 1,480 AC024958.8(167718-169199)−
27* 13q12.12 2,594 AL354798.13(87421-90016)+ 98* 8q11.1 5,213 AC104576.5(126768-131982)− AluY
28* 13q21.33 5,034 AL139001.14(80673-85708)+ 99* 8q12.1 5,355 AC091561.4(180441-185797)−
29* 13q33.1 4,742 AL158063.12(110923-115660)+ 100* 8q21.3 3,720 AC110012.3(134095-137806)+
30* 14q21.1 2,851 AL356800.3(99279-102131)− 101* 9p24.1 2,439 AL133547.16(38846-41286)+
31* 14q21.2 3,680 AL161752.4(85483-89164)− 102* 9p23 6,219 AL451129.6(16932-23152)+
32* 14q31.1 8,654 AC018513.5(19822-28477)+ L1PA6/LTR12B/LTR30/LTR12 103* 9q31.1 5,187 AL353805.20(30116-35304)+ AluY
33 14q32.33 5,131 AB019437.1(130399-135531)− 104* Xp21.3 7,304 AC024024.6(102529-109834)− L1PA5
34 15q15.1 4,345 AC087878.7(92196-96542)− AluSg 105* Xp21.3 1,130 AC005297.1(121542-122663)−
35* 15q21.2 6,206 AC025040.7(64493-65286)+ L1PA4 106* Xp11.1 2,576 AL354756.18(14248-16813)+ LTR15
36* 15q21.3 4,766 AC068723.5(70564-75331)+ 107* Xq11.2 6,619 AL158203.12(31906-38526)+
37* 16q11.2 4,828 AC002519.1(63018-67847)− L1M1 108* Xq11.2 5,610 AL353744.18(117924-123535)+ AluYb9
38* 16q11.2 1,962 AC116553.1(78427-80390)+ 109 Xq12 2,643 AL445523.11(68589-71233)+
39 16q11.2 670 AC106785.2(45130-45801)+ 110* Xq13.2 7,328 AL356513.11(68589-71233)+ aluYb9
40 16q11.2 6,776 AC106785.2(47835-54612)+ AluY/LTR19 111* Xq21.1 4,840 AL592171.8(18287-23126)+
41* 18q12.1 4,077 AC074237.4(26672-30750)− 112* Xq21.1 3,222 AL592563.7(16340-19563)+
42 18q21.2 687 AC091135.9(62209-62897)+ 113 Xq21.32 8,115 AL390840.17(189393-197509)+ L1PA5/L1P (in 5′ LTR)
43 18q21.2 2,626 AC091135.9(62917-65544)+ AluY/AluSp
44* 19p13.11 5,715 AC123912.1(76824-82540)+ AluY 114* Xq22.1 6,473 AL133277.12(1570-8044)+
45* 19p12 2,998 AC011493.4(81474-84473)− 115* Xq27.3 3,446 AL589669.11(157039-160486)+
46 19p12 4,950 AC011493.4(6132-62291)− AluSC/AluY/LTR7/HERV-H 116* Xq28 5,541 U69569.1(1847-7389)−
47 19p12 5,495 AC011503.4(27693-33189)+ AluSq 117* Yp11.2 9,515 AC007274.3(24960-34472)+ LTR6A/LTR12C
48* 19p12 3,594 AC011503.4(47638-51233)+ AluSP/MER9 118* Yp11.2 4,211 AC007275.4(152708-156920)+ LTR17
49 19q11 5,625 AC006504.1(39162-44788)+ AluYc 119* Yp11.2 3,051 AC016749.4(131255-134304)+ AluY
50* 19q13.2 2,583 AC005337.1(9746-12325)+ AluY/L1PA5 120 Yp11.2 8,661 AC009952.4(75135-83798)+ AluY/MER11C
51 2p23.3 2,713 AC010896.15(27276-29990)+ LTR17/AluY/AluY 121* Yp11.2 7,321 AC006986.3(138260-145567)+ AluY/MER11C
52* 2p16.1 4,931 AC010738.5(72193-77125)− MER2 122* Yq11.221 5,070 AC006383.2(68883-73954)+
53* 2p13.2 7,718 AC007878.2(183549-185134)+ 123 Yq11.222 5,120 AC009233.3(17211-22332)+
54* 2q21.1 6,694 AC068282.2(50964-57659)+ AluSc 124* Yq11.222 4,573 AC009233.3(108140-112714)+ AluY/LTR12
55 2q24.3 5,920 AC092583.2(123236-129157)+ LTR12C 125* Yq11.223 6,119 AC007678.3(88618-94734)+ AluSc/AluSp/q
56* 2q31.1 7,767 AC092641.2(5721-13489)− 126* Yq11.223 5,261 AC009494.2(123311-128573)+ AluSc (in 3′ LTR)
57 2q31.1 6,672 AC078883.6(131188-137864)+ 127* Yq11.223 7,720 AC009489.3(81570-89291)+
58* 2q37.1 5,575 AC009407.8(76629-82201)+ LTR10F/HERVIP10FH/LTR10F 128* Yq11.223 5,420 AC007876.2(100813-1062334)+
59* 20p13 5,040 AL049761.11(10942-15983)+ 129 Yq11.223 12,395 AC009239.3(23104-35500)+ LTR12B/LTR12C/LTR12/HERV9
60 20p11.21 654 AL031673.19(32505-33148)+ HERVIP10FH/AluY (in 3′ LTR)
61* 3q26.1 4,716 AC018457.14(44247-48964)− 130* Yq11.223 8,661 AC021107.3(71095-79756)+ AluY/MER11C
62* 3q26.2 1,878 AC008040.7(24180-26059)− 131* Yq11.223 7,336 AC025227.6(46631-53968)+
63* 4p13 1,446 AC096586.3(21933-23380)− AluY 132* Yq11.223 1,397 AC007320.3(110244-111627)+
64* 4q13.1 2,569 AC097648.2(119741-122311)+ 133* Yq11.223 9,515 AC010080.2(28375-37888)+ LTR6A/LTR12C
65* 4q13.3 1,288 AC024722.5(111362-112651)+ 134 Yq11.223 12,888 AC006366.3(74013-86902)+ HERVIP10FH/AluYa5/LTR12C
66* 4q13.3 4,976 AC024722.5(112653-117630)+ LTR30/LTR12/L1PA3
67* 4q21.23 3,800 AC097488.2(13713-17514)+ 135 Yq11.223 206 AC01088.3(205-412)+
68* 4q24 4,831 AC107381.2(38346-43178)+ 136* Yq11.223 9,515 AC009947.2(47848-57361)+ LTR6A/LTR12C
69* 4q28.3 6,627 AC096763.2(19403-26031)+ 137 Yq11.223 886 AC010153.3(22418-23305)+
70 4q28.3 6,635 AC108867.3(109215-115851)+ LTR12C/LTR22 138 Yq11.23 886 AC016728.4(82188-83075)+
71* 4q32.1 4,137 AC009567.8(47850-51988)− 139* Yq11.23 9,515 AC006991.3(107651-117164)+ LTR64/LTR12C
Open in a new tab
a

HERV-K(HML-5) loci are numbered consecutively. Chromosomal (Chr.) band locations as well as sizes of proviruses or remnants of loci are given. Accession numbers of finished Genbank human genome sequence entries, including nucleotide position within the entry and orientation (+ or −) of the HERV-K (HML-5) portion are given in the fourth column. The last column lists non-HERV-K(HML-5) repetitive elements within proviral sequences.

Translation of our consensus sequence gave rise to ORFs for four major retroviral proteins that were not found as such in the Repbase sequence. ORFs for putative retroviral gag, prt, pol, and env genes could be defined (Fig. 1; see also Fig. 1A in the supplemental material, which is also available from us upon request). The putative 517-, 265-, 911-, and 694-amino-acid Gag, Prt, Pol, and Env proteins, respectively, displayed extended similarities to the corresponding retroviral proteins, as revealed by CD-search and BlastP analysis. As described recently, HML-5 proviruses once harbored a potentially active dUTPase enzyme within the prt ORF and also a domain encoding a retroviral aspartyl protease (30). As expected, the pol reading frame encoded retroviral reverse transcriptase, RNase H, and integrase domains. CD-search furthermore identified a HERV-K/MMTV-type gp36 domain within the Env protein C-terminal portion (Fig. 1). BlastP analysis of encoded retroviral proteins against the GenBank protein division revealed high similarities to retroviral proteins from the HERV-K(HML-2) family. Moreover, significant similarities to the betaretroviruses ovine pulmonary adenocarcinoma virus, MMTV, Mason-Pfizer monkey virus, and simian retroviruses 1 and 2 were detected, with identities to respective retroviral proteins ranging from 26 to 49% and similarities ranging from 41 to 64% (as determined by BLAST). Thus, our method was able to reconstruct all putative coding sequences of an ancient betaretrovirus.

The HML-5 sequence was initially assigned to the HERV-K superfamily due to the similarity in pol with other HERV-K families. Based on the analysis of an earlier draft version of the human genome sequence, Tristem suggested that the HERV-K(HML-5) primer binding site region is more similar to isoleucine than to lysine (43). We analyzed the HERV-K(HML-5) consensus primer binding site region in regard to the similarity to reported human tRNA sequences (22) (http://rna.wustl.edu/GtRDB/) and found that the HML-5 primer binding site is identical in sequence to the methionine tRNA 3′ end along at least 18 nucleotides (nt). Isoleucine tRNA displayed differences in three nucleotides, and lysine tRNAs displayed at least six different nucleotides (Fig. 2). Therefore, following the current HERV nomenclature, the HERV-K(HML-5) family should be designated HERV-M.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Open in a new tab

Sequence comparison of the HERV-K(HML-5) consensus sequence primer binding site with reported tRNA 3′ ends (http://rna.wustl.edu/GtRDB). Shown here are the HERV-K(HML-5) consensus primer binding site regions from Repbase (Rep) and as generated in this study (own) and the closest matching methionine, isoleucine, lysine, and arginine tRNA 3′ ends. Anticodon sequences are given in brackets.

Phylogeny of the HERV-K(HML-5) family.

Dot matrix comparisons between the different proviruses and the HERVK22 sequence flanked by LTR22A, as included in Repbase, showed that only a few entries presented more extended similarities with the LTR22A sequence. This finding suggested the existence of one or more LTR variants associated with HML-5 sequences and corroborated the definition of different LTR22 subfamilies in Repbase (LTR22, LTR22A, and LTR22B). For each proviral entry, we utilized RepeatMasker annotations to determine the presence of complete or deleted 5′ and 3′ LTRs (Table 2). We found that 70 proviral sequences were associated with full-length LTRs on both sides, 59 entries harbored at least one complete or deleted LTR on one side, and 10 entries lacked both LTRs. We generated a ClustalW multiple alignment with default alignment parameters for a total of 134 fairly complete LTR sequences.

TABLE 2.

Assignment of LTR sequences associated with HERV-K(HML-5) proviral bodiesa

No. Annotation
Age No. Annotation
Age No. Annotation
Age
Repbase
Ours
Repbase
Ours
Repbase
Ours
5′ LTR 3′ LTR 5′ LTR 3′ LTR 5′ LTR 3′ LTR 5′ LTR 3′ LTR 5′ LTR 3′ LTR 5′ LTR 3′ LTR
1 22A no 22A 48 22A (−) 22A 22A 95 22 22B 22B
2 22A 22A 22A 22A 50.8 49 22 22B 22B 96 22 22 22A2 22A2
3 22 22 (−) 50 22 no 97 22A 22A (−) 22A
4 22 22 51 22A no 22A 98 22 22 22 22 59.1
5 22 22 (−) 52 22 22A (−) 22A2 99 22 no
6 no 22 53 22A 22A 22A 22A 38.4 100 no no
7 22A 22A 22A 22A 54 22 22 22 22 47.9 101 22B (−) 22B 22B
8 22A 22A 22A 22A 55 22 22 102 22 22 amb. amb. 50.3
9 22 22 56 22 22 22 22 36.1 103 22 22 amb. amb. 36.7
10 22 22B 22B 57 22B 22B 22B 22B 35.4 104 22A no 22A
11 22B 22B (−) 22B 58 22 22 22A2 105 22 no
12 22 22 59 22 22 22A2 22A2 47.7 106 no 22B 22B
13 22 22 22A2 22A2 40.6 60 no no 107 22B 22B 22B 22B 51.8
14 22 no 22 61 no 22 22A2 108 22A 22A 22A 22A 48.6
15 22 22 62 22A 22A 22A 22A 30.4 109 22 no
16 22A (−) no 63 22 no 110 22 22 22 22 47.5
17 22A (−) no 64 22A 22A 22A 22A 52.5 111 22A (−) 22A 22A
18 no no 65 22A 22A (−) 112 no 22 22B
19 no no 66 22A 22A 22A 22A 113 22 22
20 22A 22A 22A 22A 38.5 67 22 22 (−) 114 22 22 amb. amb. 38.7
21 22A 22A 22A2 22A2 38.2 68 22 22 22 22 68.6 115 22A 22A 22A 22A 34.7
22 22 22 (−) 69 22 (−) 22 22A2 116 no 22 22
23 22 22 22A2 22A2 45.3 70 22 (−) 22 117 no 22 22B
24 22B 22B 22B 22B 32.3 71 22 22 118 22/22A 22/22A
25 22 22 72 22 22 22 22 119 no no
26 22A 22A 22A 22A 54.5 73 no 22A 22A 120 22B 22B 22B 22B 86.7
27 22A 22A (−) 74 22A no 22A 121 no 22 22B
28 22 22 22A 22A 38 75 22 22 122 22A 22A 22A 22A
29 22 22 22A2 22A 42.2 76 22B 22B 22B 22B 43 123 22B 22B 22B 22B 77.9
30 no no 77 22 22 22 22 25.2 124 22 (−) no
31 22 22 78 22A (−) 22A 22A 22A 125 22A no 22A
32 22B 22B 22B 22B 37.5 79 no no 126 22 22 amb.
33 22B (−) 22B 22B 80 no no 127 22B 22B 22B 22B 92.7
34 no 22 81 22A no 128 no 22 amb.
35 22A 22A (−) 22A 82 22A 22 (−) 22A 129 22 22B
36 22 22 amb. amb. 59.7 83 22 22 22 22 130 22B 22B
37 22 no 22A2 84 22 22 131 no 22 22B
38 22 22 85 no 22 22A2 132 no no
39 no 22B 22B 86 22A no 22A 133 no 22
40 22B 22B 22B 22B 54.4 87 22 22 22 22 56.1 134 22 22
41 22 22 (−) 22A2 22A2 56.6 88 22A 22A 22A 22A 41.1 135 no no
42 no no 89 22 no 136 no 22
43 22A no 22A 90 no 22B 137 22 no
44 22A no 22A 91 22B 22 22B 138 22 no
45 22A 22A 22A 22A 68 92 22 22 22 22 52.8 139 no 22
46 22 22 93 22A 22A 22A 22A 52.6
47 22A 22A 22A 94 22 22A 22A 22A 70.6
Open in a new tab
a

Numbers in the first column correspond to those in Table 1. Annotations of 5′ and 3′ LTRs according to RepeatMasker and to our own analysis are indicated. Differences between RepeatMasker and our own annotations are indicated in bold. no, the corresponding LTR was missing; (−), LTRs having reverse complement orientations as annotated by RepeatMasker. Our own annotations include LTRs for which subfamily assignment was possible. Here, “amb.” indicates that ambiguous LTRs could not be assigned to a particular family; that is, they grouped phylogenetically between the LTR22 and LTR22B subfamilies (data not shown). The evolutionary ages of proviruses in millions of years according to Kimura-2-parameter corrected distances are listed for proviruses with sufficient 5′ and 3′ LTR portions.

Neighbor-joining analysis of the sequences subject to multiple alignment suggested the existence of several LTR subfamilies (Fig. 3). A major branch, displaying 100% bootstrap support (1,000 replicates), consisted of sequences similar to the LTR22A subfamily. Among those sequences, two subgroups displaying 63 and 91% bootstrap support could be distinguished. We named these two subgroups LTR22A and LTR22A2. Another group (99% support) consisted of sequences with similarity to the LTR22 subfamily. The majority of the remaining sequences were more similar to the LTR22B subfamily. Therefore, analysis of the entire HML-5 data set revealed three major LTR subfamilies (LTR22, LTR22A, and LTR22B) associated with the proviral sequences and is in accord with previous findings. In addition, LTR22A comprises a clearly distinguishable subgroup, named LTR22A2.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Open in a new tab

Neighbor-joining analysis of 134 reasonably intact HERV-K(HML-5) LTR sequences. Shown here is a consensus tree from 1,000 bootstraps replicates. Specific bootstrap values at major nodes are indicated. Consensus sequences, as given in Repbase (Rep) and as generated in this study (own), were also included in the analysis. LTR22 and LTR22A sequences are clearly distinguished, with the latter comprising the so-called LTR22A2 group. Other sequences belong to the LTR22B group with some ambiguous sequences remaining (Table 2). Note that the LTR22 Repbase sequence groups with LTR22B sequences, opposed to LTR22own. Numbers of LTR sequences refer to the proviruses listed in Table 1. The 5′ and 3′ LTRs of a particular provirus located at immediately neighboring terminal nodes are indicated as 5/3. Note in this context that 5′ and 3′ LTRs of particular proviruses do not always group together, reminiscent of recently suggested HERV-involving genomic rearrangement events (13).

Based on the larger data set available in our study (40), we generated three new consensus sequences for the LTR22 families listed in Repbase and for LTR22A. The classification of LTR sequences in Table 2 is based on their phylogenetic relationship to those new LTR22 consensus sequences. The new consensus sequences for LTR22B and LTR22A displayed lengths of 497 and 457 bp, respectively, and were modestly different from the Repbase sequences. The 471-nt-long LTR22A2 consensus sequence presented 74% identity and 4% gaps compared to LTR22A. As revealed in this study, the previously established Repbase LTR22 consensus sequence was probably derived from three loci located on the Y chromosome (proviruses 117, 121, 131; Fig. 3) that are less representative for LTR22. The LTR22 consensus sequence generated in this study is 492 bp in length compared to the 580-nt Repbase sequence that furthermore included 47 ambiguous positions (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry codes).

We furthermore analyzed the phylogenetic relationships between HERV-K(HML-5) proviruses for five different proviral regions (representing all major retroviral genes) by neighbor-joining and bootstrap analysis. Phylogenetic trees displayed similar branch lengths with respect to the consensus sequence, suggesting a similar nucleotide divergence and age of proviral sequences (data not shown). Neighbor-joining analysis implied two HML-5 subfamilies, but they were not supported in the bootstrap analysis. Only a few chromosome Y sequences were distinguished from the remaining sequences with higher bootstrap support (Fig. 4). An exception was obtained for the region spanning the end of reverse transcriptase until the start of RNase H. In this case, a subfamily of 28 proviral sequences was distinguished with 86% bootstrap support that was mostly associated with LTR22A and LTR22A2 sequences. Eight more LTR22B sequences were separated with 90% support. The remaining 14 sequences (with low bootstrap support) were either LTR22 or LTR22B (data not shown). Taken together, analysis of four out of five internal regions supports the observation that HML-5 proviral bodies do not form distinct subgroups but rather represent a monophyletic group, in contrast to phylogenetically clearly different LTR sequences.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Open in a new tab

Neighbor-joining analysis of HERV-K(HML-5) proviruses. The tree shown here was obtained from the analysis of a gag gene portion (region 1 in Fig. 1) and is a consensus tree from 100 bootstrap replicates. Numbers of proviral sequences refer to Table 1. Phylogenetic analysis included HERV-K(HML-5) homologous sequences from the same gag region, obtained by PCR from various primate species (for species abbreviations, see the legend for Fig. 5).

Age of the HERV-K(HML-5) family.

A number of repetitive elements were found in HERV-K(HML-5) proviruses. In particular, reasonably old Alu subfamilies, such as AluSg, AluSc, and AluSp (Table 1), with approximate evolutionary ages of 31, 35, 37 million years (16), respectively, suggested an evolutionary age of HML-5 proviruses higher than that of other HERV-K families. The age of a provirus can be estimated from sequence comparison of flanking 5′ and 3′ LTRs. Owing to the retroviral reverse transcription strategy, both LTR sequences are identical in sequence at the time of provirus formation. Without selective pressure, both LTRs independently accumulate mutations over time. Thus, sequence differences between a provirus' LTRs are an approximate measure of provirus age (8). We determined the degree of sequence divergence between 5′ and 3′ LTRs with larger overlapping portions for 53 HML-5 proviruses. We obtained sequence divergences ranging from 6 to 24% (mean, 12.9%; standard deviation, 3.87). These numbers equal an approximate age of 50 (±15) million years for the HML-5 proviruses (Table 2). We furthermore calculated the average ages of proviral sequences from Kimura-2-parameter corrected distances to the HML-5 consensus sequence for five different proviral regions, excluding gaps and CpG dinucleotides (16). Here, an average evolutionary age of about 60 (±27) million years was indicated. The age of roughly 55 million years from both analyses thus corresponds to a HML-5 integration time into the genome clearly before the evolutionary split of Old World from New World monkeys that took place about 40 million years ago. This observation is in contrast to other HERV-K families described till now because those are not present in New World monkeys, suggesting that HML-5 represents an ancient betaretrovirus family in primates. To investigate the possibility that HML-5 elements are present in New World primate genomes, we examined the species distribution of HML-5 gag and env regions by PCR with genomic DNA from hominoids, Old World monkeys, New World monkeys, and prosimians. The amplified portion in the gag gene was located outside the above-described commonly deleted region, whereas the amplicon in env included the frequently deleted region. We obtained gag and env PCR products of expected sizes from all species tested, except for prosimians (Fig. 5). This result was in good agreement with the above-mentioned age estimate from LTR and consensus sequence analysis. Full-length env genes, present in a minority of HML-5 proviruses in the human genome, were amplified as a PCR product from all species. PCR products corresponding to the env deletion variant were also amplified, indicating the presence of both longer and shorter env variants in all tested species.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Open in a new tab

Presence of HERV-K(HML-5) homologous sequences in various primate species. The schematic depicts localization of PCR primer pairs within the proviral body 5′ end and within the env gene region of the HERV-K(HML-5) consensus sequence, yielding PCR products of about 548 bp and about 1,635 or 300 bp. The latter number considers the common presence of deleted env gene regions. PCR results are presented in the first and second panel, respectively. Amplification of full-length env genes in all species but the prosimian could not be reproduced satisfactorily. A schematic of primate phylogeny and germ line fixation of HERV-K(HML-5) versus other HERV-K families is shown at the bottom. Species abbreviations are as follows: for Hominoidea, Hsa is Homo sapiens, Ptr is Pan troglodytes, Ppy is Pongo pygmaeus, and Hla is Hylobates lar; for Old World primates, Cgu is Colobus guereza, Msp is Mandrillus sphinx, and Mmu is Macaca mulatta; for New World primates, Ssc is Saimiri sciureus, Cja is Callithrix jacchus, and Ase is Alouatta seniculus; for prosimians, Nyc is Nycticebus coucang.

We cloned PCR products from the gag region obtained from P. troglodytes, H. lar, M. mulatta, and A. seniculus and sequenced, in total, 16 clones. The sequences were included in the neighbor-joining analysis presented in Fig. 2. The nonhuman sequences grouped among the human sequences; that is, they did not form separate branches or groups. Also, the percentage of identity with the human consensus sequence was very similar: 82 to 91% compared to 78 to 92% for the human sequences. Therefore, our sample sequence data set does not indicate different evolutionary behavior of HERV-K(HML-5) homologous sequences in the examined nonhuman primates. However, more elaborate studies will be required to characterize precise evolutionary behavior of HERV-K(HML-5) homologues in primates after their evolutionary separation from the human lineage.

DISCUSSION

HERV represent former exogenous retroviruses that are fossilized in the human genome. Closer examination of HERV sequences provides information on ancient primate-targeting retroviruses and retrovirus evolution in general. The completed sequence of the human genome provides an excellent source of information for such studies. In this paper, we set out to analyze a hitherto little-characterized HERV family, HERV-K(HML-5), in more detail. We found that only 9 out of the approximately 139 HML-5 loci (6%) displayed full-length retroviral genes flanked by LTRs on both sides. A higher number of HML-5 loci are defective regarding proviral structures; gag-prt and/or env regions are missing in about 50% of proviruses, and the start and end points of deletions obviously cluster within defined regions. Analogous observations were recently made for HERV-K(HML-3), displaying deletions within gag and pol (26). Amplification of deleted proviruses has been observed also for other HERV families, for example, deleted HERV-H elements have increased to high copy numbers during primate evolution in comparison to full-length HERV-H proviruses (24). Recombination on the DNA level, mutations during retroviral reverse transcription, or splicing of retroviral transcripts before reverse transcription and provirus formation could account for such deleted proviruses. Spliced and reintegrated transcripts have been observed for HERV (12, 21). Spliced human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transcripts were also found as cDNA along with full-length retroviral RNA during infection (20), further supporting provirus formation from spliced proviral transcripts in the evolutionary past. Besides active amplification of proviral sequences, about 5% of proviral loci probably arose passively from chromosomal duplications, owing to the fact that the human genome comprises about 5% of duplicated sequences (14). In contrast, we do not find evidence that HML-5 sequences were amplified by L1-mediated pseudogene formation, as recently described for HERV-W (6, 37).

HML-5 loci with both gag-prt and env deletions probably emerged during reverse transcription by recombination between RNA transcripts from proviruses having either deletion. In combination with HERV-K(HML-3) deletion variants (26), we note that despite the lack of one or more proviral regions, the 5′ intergenic and gag portions are usually present in obviously (retrovirus-like) retrotransposed proviruses. Those retroviral regions are known to encode the packaging signal Ψ that interacts on the RNA level with the Gag-encoded nucleocapsid (NC) protein. One may therefore hypothesize that interaction between retroviral RNA and NC is still essential during intracellular (retrovirus-like) retrotransposition of HERV. Alternatively, helper viruses could have been involved in the formation of new proviruses, and a packaging signal could have interacted with the helper virus' NC protein. Also in combination with previous results (9, 26), deletions within the env gene seem to occur recurrently, rendering the Env protein nonfunctional. Env-demolishing mutations could have resulted in decreasing production of infectious retrovirus. Such decrease could have significantly added to the fading of exogenous stages, and env deletions may therefore represent another cause for the extinction of exogenous stages.

Our study shows that HML-5 sequences were fixed in an ancestral genome after the simian lineage had evolutionary separated from the prosimian lineage but before the evolutionary separation of Old World and New World primates, indicated by provirus ages of approximately 55 million years and corroborated by PCR examination of various primate species. Other HERV-K superfamily members were fixed in an ancestral genome approximately 30 to 40 million years ago, after the evolutionary split of Old World from New World primates (26, 28, 34, 39). To the best of our knowledge, HML-5 represents the oldest betaretrovirus in the primate genome known to date. Despite a relatively high proportion of incomplete HML-5 proviruses in the human genome, our study generated a consensus sequence displaying the four major retroviral ORFs gag, prt, pol, and env. The corresponding proteins displayed significant similarities to other betaretroviruses, and the recreated HML-5 consensus is therefore expected to be very close in sequence to the former exogenous precursor to HML-5 endogenous variants. Thus, this study reconstructed an ancient betaretrovirus that was targeting primates about 55 million years ago.

Phylogenetic analysis of several proviral regions indicated similar sequence divergence among HML-5 sequences, resulting in almost monophyletic tree structures. This finding indicates that probably all HML-5 sequences were generated in a relatively brief evolutionary period around 55 million years ago, the latter as revealed by LTR-LTR divergences and divergence from the consensus sequence. Formation of new proviruses then obviously ceased. Proviruses with deletions in gag-prt and env were probably also generated in a relatively short period of time. This observation is further confirmed by PCR analysis that revealed gag and env deletions in all tested HML-5-positive primate species. Thus, different HML-5 “master proviruses” with different genome structures were obviously active and generated provirus progeny. In this manner, HML-5 displays similar behavior as HERV-K(HML-3) (26). However, both families display different behavior than HERV-K(HML-2), which formed proviruses during the hominoid period as well as in recent human evolution (5, 7, 28, 33).

Phylogenetic analysis of LTR sequences associated with proviral bodies revealed several apparent LTR families. However, phylogenetic analysis of proviral body sequences yielded monophyletic tree topologies for most examined regions. Only a region between reverse transcriptase and RNase H displayed branches with higher bootstrap support. Clearly, proviral bodies appear much more homogeneous in sequence than the associated LTR sequences. Thus, almost homogeneous proviral bodies were associated with clearly different LTR variants at the time of provirus formations. It is currently not known whether the different LTR variants were already present in the exogenous precursor(s) or represent derivatives from a germ line-fixed LTR founder family. In both cases, LTR sequences evolved in sequence independently from, and obviously more rapidly than, the proviral bodies. Reasons for apparently different evolutionary rates of LTRs and proviral bodies are currently not clear.

Whether HML-5 is ancestral to other HERV-K families currently seems unclear. Both the HML-5 and HML-6 families appear less related to the remaining HERV-K families, as evidenced by DNA sequence comparisons (32) and by phylogenetic comparison of dUTPase domains (30), for instance. In addition, this study revealed that the HML-5 consensus sequence primer binding site is identical to methionine but clearly less similar to lysine tRNA 3′ ends; therefore, it is actually a HERV-M family and adds to the lesser phylogenetic relationship with HERV-K. However, HML-5 is still more related to HERV-K than to other (beta)retroviruses. Also in the course of this study, when employing an updated tRNA sequence data set (22) we noted that the previously characterized HERV-K(HML-3) family primer binding site region (26) is more related to arginine and asparagine than to lysine tRNA 3′ ends, therefore actually requiring designation HERV-R or HERV-N. At the present time, the precise phylogenetic relationship of HML-5 to other HERV-Ks as well as endogenous and exogenous retroviruses must await further specific investigations. We are currently studying the remaining HERV-K families in a similar fashion. Certainly, results for other hitherto little-described HERV families will significantly contribute to such studies.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]
jvirol_78_16_8788__index.html (848B, html)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to J.M. (Ma2298/2-1) and E.M. (Me917/16-1). P.M. is supported by a fellowship from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation and grants from the Swedish Research Council, Åke Wiberg Foundation, and Magn Bergvall Foundation. W.S. is supported by DFG grant SCH214/7-3.

Footnotes

†

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jvi.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Andersson, M. L., M. Lindeskog, P. Medstrand, B. Westley, F. May, and J. Blomberg. 1999. Diversity of human endogenous retrovirus class II-like sequences. J. Gen. Virol. 80:255-260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Berkhout, B., M. Jebbink, and J. Zsiros. 1999. Identification of an active reverse transcriptase enzyme encoded by a human endogenous HERV-K retrovirus. J. Virol. 73:2365-2375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blond, J. L., D. Lavillette, V. Cheynet, O. Bouton, G. Oriol, S. Chapel-Fernandes, B. Mandrand, F. Mallet, and F. L. Cosset. 2000. An envelope glycoprotein of the human endogenous retrovirus HERV-W is expressed in the human placenta and fuses cells expressing the type D mammalian retrovirus receptor. J. Virol. 74:3321-3329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boissinot, S., and A. V. Furano. 2001. Adaptive evolution in LINE-1 retrotransposons. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:2186-2194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Buzdin, A., S. Ustyugova, K. Khodosevich, I. Mamedov, Y. Lebedev, G. Hunsmann, and E. Sverdlov. 2003. Human-specific subfamilies of HERV-K (HML-2) long terminal repeats: three master genes were active simultaneously during branching of hominoid lineages. Genomics 81:149-156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Costas, J. 2002. Characterization of the intragenomic spread of the human endogenous retrovirus family HERV-W. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:526-533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Costas, J. 2001. Evolutionary dynamics of the human endogenous retrovirus family HERV-K inferred from full-length proviral genomes. J. Mol. Evol. 53:237-243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dangel, A. W., B. J. Baker, A. R. Mendoza, and C. Y. Yu. 1995. Complement component C4 gene intron 9 as a phylogenetic marker for primates: long terminal repeats of the endogenous retrovirus ERV-K(C4) are a molecular clock of evolution. Immunogenetics 42:41-52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.de Parseval, N., V. Lazar, J. F. Casella, L. Benit, and T. Heidmann. 2003. Survey of human genes of retroviral origin: identification and transcriptome of the genes with coding capacity for complete envelope proteins. J. Virol. 77:10414-10422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Felsenstein, J. 1993. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.5c. Department of Genetics SK-50, University of Washington, Seattle.
  • 11.Gifford, R., and M. Tristem. 2003. The evolution, distribution and diversity of endogenous retroviruses. Virus Genes 26:291-315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Goodchild, N. L., J. D. Freeman, and D. L. Mager. 1995. Spliced HERV-H endogenous retroviral sequences in human genomic DNA: evidence for amplification via retrotransposition. Virology 206:164-173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hughes, J. F., and J. M. Coffin. 2001. Evidence for genomic rearrangements mediated by human endogenous retroviruses during primate evolution. Nat. Genet. 29:487-489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409:860-921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jurka, J. 2000. Repbase update: a database and an electronic journal of repetitive elements. Trends Genet. 16:418-420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kapitonov, V., and J. Jurka. 1996. The age of Alu subfamilies. J. Mol. Evol. 42:59-65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kitamura, Y., T. Ayukawa, T. Ishikawa, T. Kanda, and K. Yoshiike. 1996. Human endogenous retrovirus K10 encodes a functional integrase. J. Virol. 70:3302-3306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lebedev, Y. B., O. S. Belonovitch, N. V. Zybrova, P. P. Khil, S. G. Kurdyukov, T. V. Vinogradova, G. Hunsmann, and E. D. Sverdlov. 2000. Differences in HERV-K LTR insertions in orthologous loci of humans and great apes. Gene 247:265-277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liang, C., J. Hu, R. S. Russell, M. Kameoka, and M. A. Wainberg. 2004. Spliced human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA is reverse transcribed into cDNA within infected cells. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 20:203-211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lindeskog, M., and J. Blomberg. 1997. Spliced human endogenous retroviral HERV-H env transcripts in T-cell leukaemia cell lines and normal leukocytes: alternative splicing pattern of HERV-H transcripts. J. Gen. Virol. 78:2575-2585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lowe, T. M., and S. R. Eddy. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:955-964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lower, R., J. Lower, and R. Kurth. 1996. The viruses in all of us: characteristics and biological significance of human endogenous retrovirus sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:5177-5184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mager, D. L., and J. D. Freeman. 1995. HERV-H endogenous retroviruses: presence in the New World branch but amplification in the Old World primate lineage. Virology 213:395-404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mager, D. L., and P. Medstrand. 2003. Retroviral repeat sequences. In D. Cooper (ed.), Nature encyclopedia of the human genome. Macmillan Publishers Ltd., Hampshire, England.
  • 26.Mayer, J., and E. Meese. 2002. The human endogenous retrovirus family HERV-K(HML-3). Genomics 80:331-343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mayer, J., E. Meese, and N. Mueller-Lantzsch. 1997. Chromosomal assignment of human endogenous retrovirus K (HERV-K) env open reading frames. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 79:157-161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mayer, J., E. Meese, and N. Mueller-Lantzsch. 1998. Human endogenous retrovirus K homologous sequences and their coding capacity in Old World primates. J. Virol. 72:1870-1875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mayer, J., E. Meese, and N. Mueller-Lantzsch. 1997. Multiple human endogenous retrovirus (HERV-K) loci with gag open reading frames in the human genome. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 78:1-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mayer, J., and E. U. Meese. 2003. Presence of dUTPase in the various human endogenous retrovirus K (HERV-K) families. J. Mol. Evol. 57:642-649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mayer, J., M. Sauter, A. Racz, D. Scherer, N. Mueller-Lantzsch, and E. Meese. 1999. An almost-intact human endogenous retrovirus K on human chromosome 7. Nat. Genet. 21:257-258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Medstrand, P., and J. Blomberg. 1993. Characterization of novel reverse transcriptase encoding human endogenous retroviral sequences similar to type A and type B retroviruses: differential transcription in normal human tissues. J. Virol. 67:6778-6787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Medstrand, P., and D. L. Mager. 1998. Human-specific integrations of the HERV-K endogenous retrovirus family. J. Virol. 72:9782-9787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Medstrand, P., D. L. Mager, H. Yin, U. Dietrich, and J. Blomberg. 1997. Structure and genomic organization of a novel human endogenous retrovirus family: HERV-K (HML-6). J. Gen. Virol. 78:1731-1744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Morgenstern, B. 1999. DIALIGN 2: improvement of the segment-to-segment approach to multiple sequence alignment. Bioinformatics 15:211-218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mueller-Lantzsch, N., M. Sauter, A. Weiskircher, K. Kramer, B. Best, M. Buck, and F. Grasser. 1993. Human endogenous retroviral element K10 (HERV-K10) encodes a full-length gag homologous 73-kDa protein and a functional protease. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 9:343-350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pavlicek, A., J. Paces, D. Elleder, and J. Hejnar. 2002. Processed pseudogenes of human endogenous retroviruses generated by LINEs: their integration, stability, and distribution. Genome Res. 12:391-399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Reus, K., J. Mayer, M. Sauter, H. Zischler, N. Muller-Lantzsch, and E. Meese. 2001. HERV-K(OLD): ancestor sequences of the human endogenous retrovirus family HERV-K(HML-2). J. Virol. 75:8917-8926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Seifarth, W., C. Baust, A. Murr, H. Skladny, F. Krieg-Schneider, J. Blusch, T. Werner, R. Hehlmann, and C. Leib-Mosch. 1998. Proviral structure, chromosomal location, and expression of HERV-K-T47D, a novel human endogenous retrovirus derived from T47D particles. J. Virol. 72:8384-8391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Smit, A. F. A. 1996. Structure and evolution of mammalian interspersed repeats. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
  • 41.Sverdlov, E. D. 2000. Retroviruses and primate evolution. Bioessays 22:161-171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tristem, M. 2000. Identification and characterization of novel human endogenous retrovirus families by phylogenetic screening of the human genome mapping project database. J. Virol. 74:3715-3730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Supplemental material]
jvirol_78_16_8788__index.html (848B, html)
jvirol_78_16_8788__1.pdf (10.2KB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES