Skip to main content
Microbes and Environments logoLink to Microbes and Environments
. 2016 Mar 3;31(1):1–3. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME3101rh

Anoxygenic Photosynthesis —A Photochemical Reaction That Does Not Contribute to Oxygen Reproduction—

Satoshi Hanada 1,*
PMCID: PMC4791109  PMID: 27021204

Plants, algae, and cyanobacteria perform photosynthesis with the resultant production of oxygen, which supports all organisms that consume it through their respiration. This type of photosynthesis is an indispensable part of the global oxygen flux. However, another type of photochemical reaction, photosynthesis without oxygen production, exists, and has been designated anoxygenic photosynthesis. A number of ecologists regard anoxygenic photosynthesis as a negligible photochemical reaction because it contributes nothing to the reproduction of oxygen. This type of photosynthesis does not appear to have any beneficial function.

The global impact of anoxygenic photosynthesis is considered to be negligible. Nevertheless, organisms in the domain Bacteria perform this type of photosynthesis, with some dilettantes referring to them as anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria. Contrary to all expectations, studies on anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria have a long history in microbiology. Anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria were discovered at the dawn of microbiology more than 100 years ago. The first anoxygenic phototrophic bacterium was identified in 1901 and was subsequently described as Rhodospirillum species by the German botanist, Hans Molisch in 1907 (10). Rhodospirillum species are purple bacteria that belong to the phylum Proteobacteria, and the term “purple bacteria”, which refers to a major group among anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria, was also simultaneously proposed by Molisch. Another major anoxygenic phototrophic group, green sulfur bacteria, which belong to the phylum Chlorobi, was described by the Russian biologist, Georgii A. Nadson in 1906 (13). Martinus W. Beijerinck, a famous microbiologist in the Netherlands, who was a contemporary of Molisch and Nadson, proposed a lactic acid bacterial group, the genus Lactobacillus, in 1901.

None of the anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria have the ability to use water as an electron donor (or cannot oxidize water), and, thus, perform photosynthesis using sulfide, hydrogen or organic substrates. Therefore, photosynthesis by these bacteria does not involve oxygen. In the domain Bacteria, oxygenic photosynthesis is limited to only one phylum, i.e., Cyanobacteria. On the other hand, anoxygenic photosynthesis is widely distributed over several bacterial phyla. Purple bacteria in the phylum Proteobacteria and green sulfur bacteria in the phylum Chlorobi described above inhabit various environments such as soil, ocean, lakes, and rivers. Some species have even been discovered in hot springs (7, 25), and a culture-independent survey revealed that a brackish lake was abundant in a number of green sulfur bacteria (12). In addition to these bacteria, there are two groups, i.e., thermophilic or mesophilic phototrophs showing filamentous morphologies, designated as filamentous anoxygenic phototrophs belonging to the phylum Chloroflexi (4), and spore-forming anoxygenic phototrophs called heliobacteria are included in the phylum Firmicutes (3). Anoxygenic phototrophs have recently been discovered in two phyla Acidobacteria and Gemmatimonadetes, i.e., Chloracidobacterium thermophilum isolated from a hot spring (23) and Gemmatimonas phototrophica from a lake (28), respectively. Therefore, the phylogenetic extent of anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria is larger than expected.

Anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria vary broadly not only in terms of their phylogenetic positions, but also in the compositions of their photosynthetic apparatuses. Organisms performing oxygenic photosynthesis, i.e., cyanobacteria, algae, and plants, basically share a common mechanism for photosynthesis; it is performed in algae and plant chloroplasts, which originated from an ancestor of cyanobacteria. They have chlorophyll a as the essential photo-pigment and two types of photochemical reaction centers called photosystems I and II. However, anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria possess bacteriochlorophyll(s) instead of chlorophyll and contain one of two photosystems because anoxygenic photosynthesis only requires one type of photochemical reaction center. Phototrophs belonging to the phyla Chlorobi (green sulfur bacteria), Firmicutes (Heliobacterium spp.) and Acidobacteria (C. thermophilum) contain photosystem I only (23). On the other hand, those in the phyla Proteobacteria (purple phototrophic bacteria), Chloroflexi (filamentous anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria), and Gemmatimonadetes ( G. phototrophica) have photosystem II (28).

In addition to photochemical reaction centers, clear differences have also been reported in the light-harvesting systems that define the absorption band of light. Almost all phototrophic members in the phyla Chlorobi, Chloroflexi and Acidobacteria possess a special light-harvesting unit called a chlorosome and mainly use infrared light at 740–750 nm. Heliobacteria in the phylum Firmicutes absorb slightly longer wavelengths (at 786–792 nm) than those of the chlorosome-equipped phototrophs. Purple phototrophic bacteria and G. phototrophica use the longest region of infrared light for photosynthesis (at 800–1020 nm). Therefore, different types of anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria may co-exist in the same environment because they share light based on to their own absorption bands. The structural and pigmentary diversities found among anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria have been attributed to their long evolutionary history. Anoxygenic photosynthesis appeared prior to the emergence of oxygenic photosynthesis, and has evolved over an extremely long period of time.

Some phototrophic organisms are considered to be more useless than anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria, and have been designated as aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria (AAnP bacteria). AAnP bacteria possess a photosynthetic apparatus, but are unable to support their growth by photosynthesis only. They are strictly aerobic heterotrophs that grow via respiration, notwithstanding their ability to photosynthesize. The first AAnP bacterium, Erythrobacter longus, was discovered by Shiba and Shimidu in 1982 (20). This discovery was followed by the proposal of two species belonging to the same genus, i.e., Roseobacter litoralis and R. denitrificans in 1991 (21). Although these three species were detected in marine environments, related AAnP bacteria have also been isolated from freshwater environments such as Porphyrobacter neustonensis (2) and Erythromicrobium ramosum (27).

These AAnP bacteria cannot produce oxygen, and are also unable to fix carbon dioxide. They make no contribution to oxygen recycling or carbon dioxide reduction, and appear to be negligible phototrophs in the global material and energy flux. However, these phototrophs vigorously thrive in aquatic environments. Several reports based on culture-dependent and -independent studies have suggested that a large number of AAnP bacteria inhabit oligotrophic marine (19) and freshwater (6) environments. Although the reasons why AAnP bacteria significantly dominate in these environments currently remain unclear, a proteomic analysis of R. litralis suggested that it possesses the capacity to regulate its metabolism in accordance with illumination (29), and the viability of an AAnP bacterium in the light was reportedly higher than that in the dark under nutrient-deficient conditions (22). The photosynthetic apparatus that they use appears to generate energy in order to survive starvation when light is provided. These features may be advantageous to AAnP bacteria and, thus, they may outcompete other non-phototrophs in oligotrophic environments. A similar increase in viability by illumination has been reported in anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria such as Rhodopseudomonas palustris (5, 8). AAnP bacteria that do not produce oxygen or fix carbon dioxide do not appear to contribute to the global ecosystem. However, they are still a considerable bacterial group due to their carbon flux in oligotrophic environments.

These AAnP bacteria have been found in authentic genera recognized as non-phototrophic groups. The genus Bradyrhizobium, which consists of root and stem-nodulating bacteria, for example, contains strains exhibiting aerobic anoxygenic phototrophy, e.g., strains BTAi1 (1), ORS285 (11) and S23321 (15), as well as non-phototrophic, nitrogen-fixing species (17, 24). This type of phototrophy has also been observed in the genus Methylobacterium, which comprises methylotrophic aerobes. Methylobacterium radiotolerans expresses a photosynthetic apparatus (14, 18), and genome analyses have revealed that several species in this genus including M. extorquens possess a complete gene set for anoxygenic photosynthesis (9, 16). Although these bacteria lack the ability to grow by photosynthesis only, similar to other AAnP bacteria, strains belonging to the genus Bradyrhizobium have the ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen and supply plants with ammonium for their synthesis of amino acids. Furthermore, species in the genus Methylobacterium also make organic matter from simple compounds, e.g., methanol, by means of unique methylotrophic metabolic pathways, and promote plant growth (9).

The fixation of nitrogen by anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria has been reported, and some species living in the soil have been shown to contribute to the growth of plants under low fertile conditions (26). In addition, a large number of anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria have the ability to fix carbon dioxide and produce organic substrates. Anoxygenic photosynthesis is an essential part of the terrestrial ecosystem and plays an important role in the global flux of carbon, nitrogen, and possibly sulfur, but never produces oxygen. These bacteria absorb extraterrestrial light energy from the sun, convert it into biochemical energy, and adapt to the terrestrial ecosystem. A large number of anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria (including AAnP bacteria) thrive in all environments worldwide; however, the reason why they are dominant in some oligotrophic environments remains unclear and their ecological roles have not yet been determined. Moreover, the huge diversity that exists in the function and pigment of anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria represents an interesting research target to provide an insight into the early evolution of photosynthesis. Anoxygenic photosynthesis does not contribute to global oxygen reproduction, but is still a biological component that is indispensable for the terrestrial ecosystem as well as the recycling of essential substrates other than oxygen.

References

  • 1.Eaglesham A, Szalay A. Aerial stem nodules on Aeschynomene spp. Plant Sci Lett. 1983;29:265–272. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fuerst J, Hawkins J, Holmes A, Sly L, Moore C, Stackebrandt E. Porphyrobacter neustonensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an aerobic bacteriochlorophyll-synthesizing budding bacterium from fresh water. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1993;43:125–134. doi: 10.1099/00207713-43-1-125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gest H, Favinger J. Heliobacterium chlorum, an anoxygenic brownish-green photosynthetic bacterium containing a ‘new’ form of bacteriochlorophyll. Arch Microbiol. 1983;136:11–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hanada S. Filamentous anoxygenic phototrophs in hot springs. Microbes Environ. 2003;18:51–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Haruta S, Kanno N. Survivability of microbes in natural environments and their ecological Iimpacts. Microbes Environ. 2015;30:123–125. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME3002rh. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hirose S, Nagashima KVP, Matsuura K, Haruta S. Diversity of purple phototrophic bacteria, inferred from pufM gene, within epilithic biofilm in Tama River, Japan. Microbes Environ. 2012;27:327–329. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME11306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hisada T, Okamura K, Hiraishi A. Isolation and characterization of phototrophic purple nonsulfur bacteria from Chloroflexus and cyanobacterial mats in hot springs. Microbes Environ. 2007;22:405–411. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kanno N, Matsuura K. Differences in survivability under starvation conditions among four species of purple nonsulfur phototrophic bacteria. Microbes Environ. 2014;29:326–328. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME14013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kwak MJ, Jeong H, Madhaiyan M, Lee Y, Sa TM, Oh TK, Kim JF. Genome information of Methylobacterium oryzae, a plant-probiotic methylotroph in the phyllosphere. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e106704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Molisch H. Die Purpurbakterien nach neuen Untersuchungen. G. Fischer; Jena: 1907. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Molouba F, Lorquin J, Willems A, Hoste B, Giraud E, Dreyfus B, Gillis M, De Lajudie P, Masson-Boivin C. Photosynthetic bradyrhizobia from Aeschynomene spp. are specific to stem-nodulated species and form a separate 16S ribosomal DNA restriction fragment length polymorphism group. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:3084–3094. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.7.3084-3094.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mori Y, Purdy KJ, Oakley BB, Kondo R. Comprehensive detection of phototrophic sulfur bacteria using PCR primers that target reverse dissimilatory sulfite reductase gene. Microbes Environ. 2010;25:190–196. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me10109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nadson G. The morphology of inferior algae. III. Chlorobium limicola Nads., the green chlorophyll bearing microbes. Bull Jard Bot St Petersb. 1906;6:190. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nishimura Y, Mukasa S, Iizuka H, Shimada K. Isolation and characterization of bacteriochlorophyll protein complexes from an aerobic bacterium, Pseudomonas radiora. Arch Microbiol. 1989;152:1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Okubo T, Tsukui T, Maita H, et al. Complete genome sequence of Bradyrhizobium sp. S23321: Insights into symbiosis evolution in soil oligotrophs. Microbes Environ. 2012;27:306–315. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME11321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Peyraud R, Schneider K, Kiefer P, Massou S, Vorholt J, Portais J. Genome-scale reconstruction and system level investigation of the metabolic network of Methylobacterium extorquens AM1. BMC Syst Biol. 2011;10:189. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Piromyou P, Songwattana P, Greetatorn T, Okubo T, Kakizaki KC, Prakamhang J, Tittabutr P, Boonkerd N, Teaumroong N, Minamisawa K. The type III secretion system (T3SS) is a determinant for rice-endophyte colonization by non-photosynthetic Bradyrhizobium. Microbes Environ. 2015;30:291–300. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME15080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sato K. Bacteriochlorophyll formation by facultative methylotrophs, Protaminobacter ruber and Pseudomonas AM 1. FEBS lett. 1978;85:207–210. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(78)80456-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sato-Takabe Y, Hamasaki K, Suzuki K. Photosynthetic competence of the marine aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacterium Roseobacter sp. under organic substrate limitation. Microbes Environ. 2014;29:100–103. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME13130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shiba T, Simidu U. Erythrobacter longus gen. nov., sp. nov., an aerobic bacterium which contains bacteriochlorophyll a. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1982;32:211–217. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shiba T. Roseobacter litoralis gen. nov., sp. nov., and Roseobacter denitrificans sp. nov., aerobic pink-pigmented bacteria which contain bacteriochlorophyll a. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1991;14:140–145. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Suyama T, Shigematsu T, Tokiwa Y, Kanagawa T, Nagashima KVP, Hanada S. Photosynthetic apparatus in Roseateles depolymerans 61A is transcriptionally induced by carbon limitation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:1665–1673. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.4.1665-1673.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tank M, Bryant D. Chloracidobacterium thermophilum gen. nov., sp. nov.: an anoxygenic microaerophilic chlorophotoheterotrophic acidobacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015;65:1426–1430. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.000113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Teamtisong K, Songwattana P, Noisangiam R, et al. Divergent Nod-containing Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9 with a megaplasmid and its host range. Microbes Environ. 2014;29:370–376. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME14065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wahlund T, Woese C, Castenholz R, Madigan M. A thermophilic green sulfur bacterium from New Zealand hot springs, Chlorobium tepidum sp. nov. Arch Microbiol. 1991;156:81–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wong W-T, Tseng C-H, Hsu S-H, Lur H-S, Mo C-W, Huang C-N, Hsu S-C, Lee K-T, Liu C-T. Promoting effects of a single Rhodopseudomonas palustris inoculant on plant growth by Brassica rapa chinensis under low fertilizer input. Microbes Environ. 2014;29:303–314. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME14056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yurkov V, Stackebrandt E, Holmes A, Fuerst JA, Hugenholtz P, Golecki J, On NGAD, Gorlenk VM. Phylogenetic positions of novel aerobic, bacteriochlorophyll a-containing bacteria and description of Roseococcus thiosulfatophilus gen. nov., sp. nov., Erythromicrobium ramosum gen. nov., sp. nov., and Erythrobacter litoralis sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1994;44:427–434. doi: 10.1099/00207713-44-3-427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zeng Y, Selyanin V, Lukeš M, Dean J, Kaftan D, Feng F, Koblížek M. Characterization of the microaerophilic, bacteriochlorophyll a-containing bacterium Gemmatimonas phototrophica sp. nov., and emended descriptions of the genus Gemmatimonas and Gemmatimonas aurantiaca. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015;65:2410–2419. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.000272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zong R, Jiao N. Proteomic responses of Roseobacter litoralis OCh149 to starvation and light regimen. Microbes Environ. 2012;27:430–442. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME12029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbes and Environments are provided here courtesy of Nakanishi Printing

RESOURCES