Abstract
Dietary intervention may alter the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system and thereby cancer risk. In a qualitative review, eleven of twenty studies showed a link between one or more carotenoids, vegetable or fruit intake and the IGF system, however, with partly contrary findings, such that no firm conclusion can be drawn. Therefore, we evaluated associations between serum carotenoid concentrations or the intake of fruits and vegetables with IGF-1, IGF binding protein (BP)-3 and their molar ratio (IGF-1:IGFBP-3) within the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, 1988–1994). In our analysis, we included 6061 NHANES III participants and used multivariable-adjusted linear regression models. IGF-1 concentrations were significantly positively associated with serum concentrations of lycopene, β-carotene, α-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin and lutein/zeaxanthin in men and women. Statistically significant positive associations were observed for serum concentrations of α-carotene and lutein/zeaxanthin and intake of fruits with serum IGFBP-3 concentrations in women, but not in men. The IGF-1:IGFBP-3 molar ratio was significantly positively associated with serum concentrations of lycopene, β-carotene and α-carotene in men and with β-carotene in women. In conclusion, dietary interventions with carotenoids, fruits and vegetables may affect the IGF system, although the direction of these effects is currently unclear.
Key words: Carotenoids, Insulin-like growth factor-1, Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3, Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Abbreviations: IGF, insulin-like growth factor; IGFBP, insulin-like growth factor binding protein; NHANES III, Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
The primary role of the human growth hormone insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis is the regulation of both prenatal and postnatal growth( 1 , 2 ), and IGF binding proteins (IGFBP) are essential modulators of the biological actions of IGF( 3 ). Besides the regulation of normal growth and ageing, the IGF system is also involved in carcinogenesis( 4 ). Circulating concentrations of IGF system components are determined by both genetic factors (40–60 %, polymorphisms, imprinting) as well as dietary and lifestyle factors (e.g. diet, smoking, physical activity and others)( 5 ).
Carotenoids, such as α-carotene, β-carotene and β-cryptoxanthin, are known as provitamin A( 6 ). Dietary β-carotene is present at relatively high concentrations in carrots and yellow and green leafy vegetables; α-carotene is present in carrots and red palm oil; and β-cryptoxanthin is found in sweet red pepper, oranges, tangerines and papaya( 7 ). Six species of carotenoids comprise about 60–70 % of the total carotenoid pool in human plasma( 8 , 9 ). The potential of carotenoids to modulate immune responses has been demonstrated in vivo and in cell models( 10 ). Besides their antioxidant activity( 11 ), investigators have proposed that carotenoids affect cell–cell communications( 12 ) and have effects on membrane structure and signal transduction pathways( 10 ). Large numbers of epidemiological studies have explored a possible association between carotenoid intake and reduced risk of CVD and cancer( 13 – 18 ), such as breast cancer( 19 ), nasopharyngeal carcinoma( 20 ) or urothelial cell carcinoma( 21 , 22 ).
Lycopene, an acyclic non-provitamin A carotene, has received considerable attention for its possible role in cancer prevention, especially prostate cancer( 23 – 25 ). Lycopene is a tomato-derived substance, but is also present in watermelon, pink grapefruit, guava, papaya and apricots( 26 ) and accounts for about 50 % of the carotenoids found in human blood; thus, it is the predominant carotenoid. It is a natural fat-soluble pigment and the most potent singlet oxygen quencher and free radical scavenger among all natural carotenoids( 27 ). Therefore, lycopene is thought to decrease cancer risk through a reduction in oxidative damage( 28 ). In animal models, effects of lycopene on the endocrine IGF system, i.e. increased serum IGFBP-3 and decreased serum IGF-1:IGFBP-3 ratio, have been described( 29 ). Lycopene may inhibit activation of the IGF-1 receptor( 30 ), alter IGF-1-stimulated cell proliferation in vitro( 30 , 31 ), induce cell cycle arrest( 26 , 28 ), modulate intercellular communication via gap junction mechanisms( 32 , 33 ), and have strong provitamin A activity via RAR-retinoid-X receptors (RXR) signalling pathways( 34 – 36 ).
Based on the observations that both carotenoids and components of the IGF system have been found to be associated with cancer risk in some studies and potential associations between lycopene, as the most abundant carotenoid, and the IGF system in in vitro and in vivo studies, it was the aim of our study to examine the associations between circulating levels of carotenoids and fruit and vegetable consumption and serum concentrations of IGF-1, IGFBP-3 and their molar ratio in a cross-sectional US study.
Methods
Study population and data collection
The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) is a nationally representative sample of civilian non-institutionalised individuals conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from 1988 to 1994( 37 ). This cross-sectional study was designed to collect the health and nutrition information of Americans aged 2 months and older through a structured household interview, serum collection and a physical examination in a mobile examination centre. In NHANES III, 39 695 persons were recruited( 37 ). The protocols for the conduct of NHANES III were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Center for Health Statistics, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
In NHANES III, a FFQ over a 1-month reference period was to assess habitual diet, and we computed total fruit (four food items) and total vegetable (eleven food items) consumption based on the FFQ information. However, since only consumption frequency, but not portion sizes, has been assessed, we were not able to adjust for energy, macro- or micronutrient intake in our analysis.
Ascertainment of carotenoids, insulin-like growth factor-1 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3
Serum concentrations of α-carotene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lycopene and lutein/zeaxanthin were determined using isocratic HPLC-based methods with detection at three different wavelengths (300, 325 and 450 nm; Waters HPLC System). Because these methods do not discriminate lutein from zeaxanthin, the combined concentration of lutein and zeaxanthin is used in analyses. Median interassay CV were 9·4 % for α-carotene, 7·0 % for β-carotene, 8·7 % for β-cryptoxanthin, 7·7 % for lycopene and 11·0 % for lutein/zeaxanthin( 38 ). IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 concentrations were assessed in serum samples of NHANES III participants, 20+ years old (n 6061) from the NHANES III study population, who had participated in a morning examination( 39 ). Individuals who participated in the morning session provided a blood sample after a mean overnight fast of approximately 11 h. Serum IGF-1 concentrations were available for 2742 men and 3316 women. Three persons were excluded with missing data. Serum samples were sent to the Diagnostic Systems Laboratories (DSL) in Webster, TX, which used the IGF-1 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DSL 10-5600) and the IGFBP-3 immunoradiometric assay (DSL 6600) to measure serum concentrations of these biomarkers. Data for storage history and quality control for the 6061 serum samples from NHANES III have been reported in another study( 39 ). The molar ratio of IGF-1:IGFBP-3 was computed as an indicator of free IGF-1 concentration( 40 ).
Statistical analysis
For the characterisation of the study population, medians and interquartile ranges of all continuous parameters and percentages of all categorical parameters by sex were computed. Linear regression was used to examine the associations of fruit and vegetable consumption and serum concentrations of carotenoids (independent variables) with serum concentration of IGF-1, IGFBP-3 and their molar ratio (IGF-1:IGFBP-3) (dependent variables). Because serum carotenoid concentrations were not normally distributed in the study population, these values were transformed using the natural logarithm. Thus, we computed geometric mean concentrations of carotenoids by quintiles of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3, separately for men and women. We decided to stratify by sex a priori because IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 concentrations differ between men and women. For fruit and vegetable consumption, which were normally distributed, we computed arithmetic means by sex. In the linear regression models, we controlled for age (continuous), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Mexican American, other), smoking status (current, former or never smoker), alcohol consumption (non-consumer, up to once per week, less than daily but more than once/week, at least once per d), BMI (continuous) and serum cholesterol concentration (continuous). These variables were chosen a priori based on a literature review. Trend tests were performed by assigning to each individual the value 1 to 5 for the concentration/consumption category (1–5) into which the subject fell. We modelled this term as a continuous variable and the coefficient was evaluated by the Wald test. All tests were two-sided; P values <0·05 were considered to be statistically significant.
All statistical analyses were performed using SUDAAN( 41 ) as implemented in SAS v. 9.1 (SAS Institute) software and weighted to take into account over-sampling, refusal, selection probabilities and differences from the general US population( 37 ). The protocols for the conduct of NHANES III were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Center for Health Statistics, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Informed consent was obtained for all participants( 25 ).
Results
Of the 2742 men included in this analysis, 77·6 % were non-Hispanic white, 9·5 % non-Hispanic black and 5·3 % Mexican-American; of the 3316 women, 76·5 % were non-Hispanic white, 11·3 % non-Hispanic black and 4·8 % Mexican-American. Table 1 shows baseline characteristics of study participants and the baseline median concentrations of carotenoids, IGF-1 and IGFBP-3. Men were younger and had higher BMI than women. Men were more likely to be current smokers and current drinkers of alcohol than women. Serum concentrations of all carotenoids but serum lycopene tended to be higher in women than in men. Serum IGF-1 concentrations tended to be higher and IGFBP-3 lower in men than in women.
Table 1.
Variables | Men (%) | Women (%) |
---|---|---|
Sex | 46·6 | 53·4 |
Race/ethnicity | ||
Non-Hispanic white | 77·6 | 76·5 |
Non-Hispanic black | 9·5 | 11·3 |
Mexican-American | 5·3 | 4·8 |
Other | 7·6 | 7·4 |
Alcohol consumption | ||
Never | 35·4 | 51·9 |
Up to once/week | 18·0 | 21·3 |
Less than daily but more than once/week | 31·5 | 21·1 |
Daily | 15·1 | 5·7 |
Smoking status | ||
Never smoker | 36·6 | 54·6 |
Former smoker | 33·2 | 21·3 |
Current smoker | 30·2 | 24·1 |
Age (years) | ||
Median | 39·8 | 40·8 |
Interquartile range | 29·4–54·2 | 30·3–56·7 |
BMI (kg/m2) | ||
Median | 25·9 | 25·1 |
Interquartile range | 23·5–29·2 | 21·8–29·7 |
Serum lycopene (μmol/l) | ||
Geometric mean | 0·40 | 0·37 |
95 % CI | 0·38, 0·41 | 0·36, 0·38 |
Serum β-carotene (μmol/l) | ||
Geometric mean | 0·23 | 0·32 |
95 % CI | 0·22, 0·24 | 0·30, 0·33 |
Serum α-carotene (μmol/l) | ||
Geometric mean | 0·05 | 0·07 |
95 % CI | 0·05, 0·06 | 0·06, 0·07 |
Serum β-cryptoxanthin (μmol/l) | ||
Geometric mean | 0·12 | 0·14 |
95 % CI | 0·12, 0·13 | 0·13, 0·14 |
Serum lutein/zeaxanthin (μmol/l) | ||
Geometric mean | 0·34 | 0·34 |
95 % CI | 0·32, 0·35 | 0·33, 0·35 |
Serum cholesterol (mmol/l) | ||
Geometric mean | 5·12 | 5·16 |
95 % CI | 5·07, 5·17 | 5·11, 5·21 |
IGF-1 (ng/ml) | ||
Geometric mean | 265 | 236 |
95 % CI | 260, 271 | 229, 243 |
IGFBP-3 (μg/g) | ||
Geometric mean | 4250 | 4431 |
95 % CI | 4179, 4322 | 4365, 4497 |
IGF, insulin-like growth factor; IGFBP, insulin-like growth factor binding protein.
In both sexes, serum IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 concentrations increased with increasing serum concentrations of all carotenoids (Table 2). Statistically significantly positive associations were observed for serum concentrations of lycopene, β-carotene, α-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin and lutein/zeaxanthin with IGF-1 in both men and women (all P trend <0·05). Overall, the increase in IGF-1 across quintiles of β-carotene, α-carotene and lutein/zeaxanthin was more pronounced among women than among men, whereas the increase in IGF-1 across quintiles of lycopene and β-cryptoxanthin was more pronounced among men.
Table 2.
IGF-1 (ng/ml) | IGFBP-3 (μg/g) | IGF-1:IGFBP-3 ratio | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Men | Women | Men | Women | Men | Women | |||||||
Geometric mean* | 95 % CI | Geometric mean | 95 % CI | Geometric mean | 95 % CI | Geometric mean | 95 % CI | Geometric mean | 95 % CI | Geometric mean | 95 % CI | |
Carotenoids | ||||||||||||
Lycopene† | ||||||||||||
Q1 | 254 | 239, 270 | 230 | 216, 245 | 4113 | 3951, 4283 | 4385 | 4262, 4511 | 0·22 | 0·21, 0·23 | 0·19 | 0·18, 0·20 |
Q2 | 262 | 251, 273 | 218 | 198, 241 | 4329 | 4197, 4466 | 4315 | 4185, 4449 | 0·22 | 0·21, 0·23 | 0·18 | 0·17, 0·20 |
Q3 | 268 | 256, 280 | 234 | 225, 243 | 4342 | 4238, 4448 | 4430 | 4325, 4538 | 0·22 | 0·21, 0·23 | 0·19 | 0·18, 0·20 |
Q4 | 262 | 253, 272 | 238 | 227, 249 | 4250 | 4127, 4376 | 4497 | 4402, 4594 | 0·22 | 0·22, 0·23 | 0·19 | 0·18, 0·20 |
Q5 | 282 | 273, 292 | 245 | 237, 253 | 4295 | 4180, 4412 | 4449 | 4342, 4560 | 0·24 | 0·23, 0·25 | 0·20 | 0·19, 0·21 |
P trend | 0·01 | 0·02 | 0·35 | 0·07 | 0·01 | 0·06 | ||||||
β-Carotene† | ||||||||||||
Q1 | 252 | 241, 263 | 204 | 180, 232 | 4289 | 4150, 4431 | 4326 | 4171, 4487 | 0·21 | 0·20, 0·22 | 0·17 | 0·15, 0·19 |
Q2 | 263 | 254, 272 | 230 | 219, 241 | 4264 | 4166, 4365 | 4404 | 4296, 4515 | 0·22 | 0·22, 0·23 | 0·19 | 0·18, 0·20 |
Q3 | 265 | 256, 275 | 234 | 223, 245 | 4216 | 4100, 4335 | 4401 | 4285, 4520 | 0·23 | 0·22, 0·24 | 0·19 | 0·18, 0·20 |
Q4 | 274 | 263, 286 | 239 | 227, 252 | 4288 | 4171, 4409 | 4466 | 4379, 4556 | 0·23 | 0·22, 0·24 | 0·19 | 0·19, 0·20 |
Q5 | 284 | 273, 295 | 258 | 249, 268 | 4316 | 4202, 4434 | 4494 | 4383, 4608 | 0·24 | 0·23, 0·25 | 0·21 | 0·20, 0·22 |
P trend | <0·01 | <0·01 | 0·70 | 0·10 | <0·01 | 0·01 | ||||||
α-Carotene† | ||||||||||||
Q1 | 256 | 248, 265 | 209 | 186, 235 | 4209 | 4108, 4311 | 4252 | 4150, 4357 | 0·22 | 0·21, 0·23 | 0·18 | 0·16, 0·20 |
Q2 | 267 | 256, 279 | 236 | 225, 246 | 4251 | 4093, 4416 | 4394 | 4303, 4487 | 0·23 | 0·22, 0·24 | 0·19 | 0·19, 0·20 |
Q3 | 264 | 251, 278 | 226 | 217, 235 | 4356 | 4183, 4535 | 4334 | 4201, 4471 | 0·22 | 0·21, 0·23 | 0·19 | 0·18, 0·20 |
Q4 | 267 | 255, 279 | 244 | 232, 256 | 4216 | 4116, 4319 | 4516 | 4413, 4620 | 0·23 | 0·22, 0·24 | 0·20 | 0·19, 0·20 |
Q5 | 284 | 271, 298 | 247 | 234, 261 | 4363 | 4212, 4520 | 4538 | 4414, 4666 | 0·24 | 0·23, 0·25 | 0·20 | 0·19, 0·21 |
P trend | 0·01 | 0·04 | 0·20 | <0·01 | 0·01 | 0·19 | ||||||
β-Cryptoxanthin† | ||||||||||||
Q1 | 257 | 248, 267 | 218 | 201, 237 | 4154 | 4055, 4256 | 4331 | 4226, 4439 | 0·22 | 0·22, 0·23 | 0·18 | 0·17, 0·20 |
Q2 | 267 | 258, 276 | 237 | 228, 246 | 4308 | 4208, 4411 | 4451 | 4365, 4538 | 0·22 | 0·22, 0·23 | 0·19 | 0·18, 0·20 |
Q3 | 267 | 258, 277 | 243 | 234, 253 | 4255 | 4125, 4389 | 4452 | 4347, 4558 | 0·23 | 0·22, 0·23 | 0·20 | 0·19, 0·21 |
Q4 | 262 | 250, 274 | 235 | 223, 248 | 4271 | 4161, 4385 | 4451 | 4302, 4606 | 0·22 | 0·21, 0·23 | 0·19 | 0·18, 0·20 |
Q5 | 292 | 281, 304 | 247 | 234, 262 | 4400 | 4256, 4549 | 4477 | 4329, 4629 | 0·24 | 0·23, 0·25 | 0·20 | 0·19, 0·21 |
P trend | <0·01 | 0·04 | 0·06 | 0·14 | 0·05 | 0·07 | ||||||
Lutein/zeaxanthin† | ||||||||||||
Q1 | 257 | 245, 269 | 214 | 196, 233 | 4166 | 4055, 4281 | 4234 | 4126, 4345 | 0·22 | 0·21, 0·23 | 0·18 | 0·17, 0·20 |
Q2 | 265 | 255, 275 | 233 | 222, 244 | 4307 | 4180, 4437 | 4402 | 4290, 4518 | 0·22 | 0·21, 0·23 | 0·19 | 0·18, 0·20 |
Q3 | 273 | 263, 285 | 245 | 235, 256 | 4274 | 4180, 4370 | 4521 | 4412, 4633 | 0·23 | 0·22, 0·24 | 0·20 | 0·19, 0·20 |
Q4 | 265 | 252, 279 | 236 | 223, 250 | 4268 | 4122, 4418 | 4428 | 4303, 4557 | 0·22 | 0·22, 0·23 | 0·19 | 0·18, 0·20 |
Q5 | 281 | 269, 295 | 244 | 234, 255 | 4347 | 4232, 4465 | 4540 | 4419, 4665 | 0·23 | 0·23, 0·24 | 0·19 | 0·19, 0·20 |
P trend | 0·01 | 0·02 | 0·10 | <0·01 | 0·07 | 0·22 | ||||||
Vegetables† | ||||||||||||
Q1 | 261 | 251, 271 | 222 | 204, 242 | 4186 | 4052, 4323 | 4293 | 4192, 4397 | 0·22 | 0·21, 0·23 | 0·18 | 0·17, 0·20 |
Q2 | 271 | 262, 280 | 237 | 227, 248 | 4254 | 4150, 4362 | 4372 | 4255, 4492 | 0·23 | 0·22, 0·23 | 0·19 | 0·19, 0·20 |
Q3 | 261 | 250, 272 | 242 | 232, 252 | 4305 | 4186, 4428 | 4552 | 4461, 4645 | 0·21 | 0·21, 0·22 | 0·19 | 0·18, 0·19 |
Q4 | 273 | 258, 289 | 229 | 218, 240 | 4310 | 4171, 4453 | 4388 | 4270, 4510 | 0·22 | 0·22, 0·23 | 0·18 | 0·17, 0·19 |
Q5 | 273 | 261, 285 | 241 | 227, 256 | 4293 | 4175, 4415 | 4501 | 4392, 4612 | 0·23 | 0·22, 0·23 | 0·19 | 0·18, 0·20 |
P trend | 0·12 | 0·05 | 0·15 | 0·80 | 0·60 | 0·79 | ||||||
Fruits† | ||||||||||||
Q1 | 258 | 245, 272 | 229 | 211, 250 | 4246 | 4097, 4400 | 4333 | 4224, 4443 | 0·21 | 0·21, 0·22 | 0·19 | 0·17, 0·20 |
Q2 | 266 | 255, 276 | 232 | 224, 241 | 4228 | 4122, 4337 | 4436 | 4347, 4526 | 0·22 | 0·21, 0·23 | 0·18 | 0·18, 0·19 |
Q3 | 274 | 263, 286 | 237 | 225, 249 | 4268 | 4137, 4404 | 4458 | 4346, 4573 | 0·23 | 0·22, 0·24 | 0·19 | 0·18, 0·20 |
Q4 | 268 | 258, 280 | 234 | 222, 246 | 4265 | 4169, 4363 | 4433 | 4340, 4528 | 0·22 | 0·22, 0·23 | 0·19 | 0·18, 0·20 |
Q5 | 271 | 260, 282 | 236 | 225, 248 | 4368 | 4247, 4493 | 4418 | 4289, 4552 | 0·22 | 0·21, 0·23 | 0·19 | 0·18, 0·20 |
P trend | 0·16 | 0·34 | 0·23 | 0·01 | 0·50 | 0·94 |
Q, quintile.
Adjusted for age, BMI, race/ethnicity, smoking, alcohol intake and serum total cholesterol concentration.
Cutpoints of quintiles are as follows: α-carotene 0·02, 0·06, 0·07, 0·11 µmol/l; β-carotene 0·13, 0·20, 0·32, 0·50 µmol/l; β-cryptoxanthin 0·09, 0·13, 0·18, 0·25 µmol/l; lutein/zeaxanthin 0·23, 0·32, 0·40, 0·53 µmol/l; lycopene 0·22, 0·32, 0·43, 0·56 µmol/l; fruit 6, 14, 30, 44 times per month; vegetables 31, 49, 71, 101 times per month.
Statistically significantly positive associations between serum concentrations of α-carotene and lutein/zeaxanthin with IGFBP-3 were observed in women (all P trend <0·05), but not in men. IGFBP-3 concentrations in men and women tended to increase with increasing lycopene, β-carotene and β-cryptoxanthin concentrations, but test for trend was not statistically significant (all P trend <0·05).
The IGF-1:IGFBP-3 molar ratio showed statistically significant positive associations with serum concentrations of lycopene, β-carotene and α-carotene in men, but no associations were observed for β-cryptoxanthin and lutein/zeaxanthin. In women, we only observed an association of the IGF-1:IGFBP-3 ratio with β-carotene concentration.
Only fruit intake was significantly positively associated with IGFBP-3 concentrations in women, and there was no significant association in men. Results for IGF-1 concentrations or the IGF-1:IGFBP-3 molar ratio were non-significant in both sexes. The analyses of the association of IGF-1, IGFBP-3 or the IGF-1:IGFBP-3 molar ratio with intake of vegetables did not show any statistically significant finding in women or men (all P trend >0·05).
Discussion
Our study was driven by the observation from animal and cell models that carotenoids, in particular lycopene, might beneficially influence components of the IGF system( 29 ). Prior to our analysis, twenty epidemiological studies had been published since 1999 that examined possible associations of carotenoid intake or circulating carotenoid concentrations, and consumption of fruits and vegetables with circulating concentrations of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 (Supplementary Table S1). Of the twenty studies, eleven showed a link between one or more carotenoids, vegetables or fruits and the IGF system with either a positive or negative association. However, the results, as discussed below, were not consistent for carotenoid subgroups or nutrients and partly contradictory.
Associations with insulin-like growth factor-1
In the NHANES III analysis, higher serum concentrations of carotenoids were associated with higher IGF-1. This is in contrast to the theory that high carotenoid concentrations may protect from cancer by decreasing circulating levels of IGF-1. Our positive associations of serum lycopene concentrations with IGF-1 concentrations in men and women contrast with three other studies (case–control or intervention study), which found an inverse relationship between lycopene (supplement use or serum level) and IGF-1 concentrations( 42 – 44 ) and thirteen studies that did not find any association (see Supplementary Table S1). All three studies with inverse associations had a very small number of participants ranging from twenty to 112 individuals and the two intervention studies( 43 , 44 ) had very short treatment duration of 10–26 d. The positive association between serum lycopene concentrations and IGF-1 concentrations in our analysis might be due to differences in adjustment( 42 , 44 ) or the selection of study participants( 43 ).
The results of our analysis are in part consistent with those of Suzuki et al.( 6 ), who observed significantly higher serum α-carotene, β-carotene and β-cryptoxanthin with increasing serum IGF-1 concentrations among women, but not men of a Japanese observational study. Our findings for associations with IGF-1 concentrations did not differ by sex. In contrast to our result and that of Suzuki et al.(6), one epidemiological study showed that serum β-carotene concentrations were inversely related to IGF-1 concentrations( 45 ). In addition, positive associations with serum IGF-1 concentrations were found for carotene( 46 ), α-carotene( 6 , 47 ), β-carotene( 6 ), β-cryptoxanthin( 6 , 48 ) and for fruit intake( 46 ), but most other studies (n 12; Supplementary Table S1) showed no association with any carotenoid, fruit or vegetable intake and IGF-1.
Associations with insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3
Positive associations with IGFBP-3 concentrations were found for lycopene( 48 , 49 ), vegetables( 50 ) and fruits( 46 ), which is in line with the observation that higher IGFBP-3 concentrations were related to decreased risk of several cancers( 51 – 53 ). In contrast, an inverse relationship with serum IGFBP-3 concentrations was reported in two case–control studies for lycopene, lutein/zeaxanthin( 6 ) and for vegetable intake( 46 ). The majority of studies (n 12), though, showed no association of any carotenoid examined with IGFBP-3 (Supplementary Table S1). The positive relationships of serum α-carotene and lutein/zeaxanthin concentrations with IGFBP-3 concentrations observed in our analysis in woman are new and in contrast to Suzuki et al.( 6 ), who found an inverse relationship of serum lutein/zeaxanthin concentrations with IGFBP-3 in men. It should be kept in mind that α-carotene concentrations in serum are generally very low and rather variable( 54 ); thus it cannot be excluded that the observed association is due to chance. Our results are in line with nine studies that reported no significant associations between lycopene and IGFBP-3 (Supplementary Table S1), although also inverse( 6 ) and positive associations( 48 , 49 ) have been reported.
Associations with the molar ratio (insulin-like growth factor-1:insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3)
In epidemiological studies, the IGF-1:IGFBP-3 molar ratio has been used as an approximate index of ‘free’, bioactive IGF-1, since IGFBP-3 is the main binding protein of IGF-1 in the circulation( 40 , 51 – 53 ). However, the biological effects of the different IGFBP on IGF-1 bioactivity are still relatively unknown. Similar to IGFBP-3, IGFBP-1 and -2 may also reduce bioactive IGF-1 by binding to it and making it unavailable for the IGF-1 receptor. On the other hand, IGFBP-1 and -2 allow the transport of IGF-1 out of the bloodstream, which may result in increased IGF-1 concentrations at the tissue level( 55 ).
In our analysis, higher molar ratios of IGF-1:IGFBP-3 were related to higher serum concentrations of lycopene, β-carotene and α-carotene in men and to higher β-carotene concentration in women. These findings are in contrast to four other studies( 42 – 44 , 56 ) that showed an inverse relationship between lycopene intake or serum concentrations to the molar ratio IGF-1:IGFBP-3; three studies showed no association with the molar ratio (Supplementary Table S1). NHANES III is the first study that examined the molar ratio and its associations with serum concentrations of β-carotene and α-carotene.
Methodological considerations
This summary of study results shows that a diet rich in carotenoids, vegetables and fruits may influence the IGF system and indirectly cancer risk, but the results were diverse. Study design, study population, and use of circulating concentration of carotenoids or dietary intake may influence the results of a study.
Seven of these previous twenty studies were intervention studies; all others were cross-sectional studies. Intervention studies are considered to provide the most reliable evidence in epidemiological research( 57 ). However, results of the intervention studies did not differ from cross-sectional studies (see Supplementary Table S1).
The majority of studies were conducted in Europe and in the USA; only a few were conducted in Japan and in Israel. In a Japanese study( 6 , 46 ) both IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 concentrations were positively associated with fruit consumption( 44 ); in a second Japanese study( 10 ) lutein/zeaxanthin and IGFBP-3 were inversely associated, and there were no significant results in studies from Europe or the USA. For other carotenoid subgroups and vegetables, we found no differences between European, Asian or US studies.
Of the twenty studies reviewed above, most assessed nutrient intake by FFQ, whereas eight studies measured carotenoid concentration in blood samples. Studies that assessed dietary lycopene intake had similarly inconsistent results as studies that examined circulating lycopene (Supplementary Table S1). Although several studies reported no associations of IGF-1 or IGFBP-3 with either dietary intake or circulating carotenoids (Supplementary Table S1), positive associations with IGF-1 were found for intake of carotenoids( 46 ) and α-carotene( 47 ) as well as α- and β-carotene concentration( 6 ). Negative associations with IGF-1 were found for intake of β-carotene( 45 ). One study reported an inverse association with IGFBP-3 for lutein/zeaxanthin concentration( 6 ). In conclusion, it appears that the assessment methodology, i.e., measurement of circulating concentrations or dietary intake assessment, has an impact on the results of a study. To further investigate this potential difference, future studies with both measurement methodologies and comparison of the results will help to elucidate these associations.
Individuals who try to eat a healthy diet, such as high in fruits, vegetables or fish, but low in red meat, sugar or salt( 58 ), are likely to lead a healthy lifestyle in general. The inability to distinguish the effect of diet from that of other lifestyle factors may pose a threat to the validity of diet–disease associations observed in epidemiological studies( 59 ). It has been suggested that carotenoids could act as surrogate markers of a diet high in fruits and vegetables( 60 ), given that high circulating levels are indeed due to high fruit and vegetable consumption rather than supplement intake. Therefore, we investigated the impact of intake of vegetables and fruits on the IGF system in this study as well. Previously, three studies( 45 , 46 , 56 ) observed an inverse relationship between vegetable intake and IGF-1, IGFBP-3 and their molar ratio, whereas a fourth( 50 ) showed positive associations for vegetable intake and IGFBP-3 in African-Americans. The results of NHANES III do not support any of these findings. None of our results for vegetable intake was statistically significant, which is consistent with several other studies (Supplementary Table S1). In contrast to vegetables, fruit intake had a positive association with serum concentrations of IGFBP-3 in women in our analysis. Our findings for the intake of fruits are consistent with those of Maruyama et al.( 46 ), but in contrast to us, they additionally showed positive associations with serum concentrations of IGF-1. Based on the observation that only few associations with the intake of vegetables and fruits but more with the intake of carotenoids were observed, one might conclude that carotenoids do not merely act as surrogate markers of a generally healthy lifestyle. To eliminate confounding, we adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, BMI, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption and serum total cholesterol concentration.
Strengths and limitations
The study population is a strength of this study as it is based on a large, nationally representative sample of the US population, and therefore the results have greater external validity than studies of more selected populations( 61 ). The composition and size of the study population provided us with the opportunity to stratify our analyses by sex. We were able to confirm prior observations regarding the relationship between some carotenoids and the IGF system and showed some new associations especially for lycopene. Diet had been assessed for a 4-week period prior to the interview. Differences in fruit and vegetable availability changes due to seasonality might have affected circulating carotenoids. Degradation of stored samples can be problematic in studies, in which these samples have long, complex storage histories. IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 were measured 10–16 years after the blood samples were obtained( 40 ). A study by Yu et al.( 62 ) has, however, shown that IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 appear to be stable in response to multiple freeze–thaw cycles. A further limitation of this study is that it is cross-sectional and that our results are based on total circulating IGF-1 levels instead of free IGF-1. Finally, we performed a large number of statistical tests and cannot exclude that some of our finding are simply due to chance.
In conclusion, this analysis further supports that the IGF system, with potential influence on several cancers, may be modified through nutrition, especially carotenoids. In NHANES III, positive relationships between serum concentrations of lycopene, β-carotene, α-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin and lutein/zeaxanthin to IGF-1 concentrations were observed, which is, however, in contrast to the expected inverse associations. The positive associations observed for serum α-carotene and lutein/zeaxanthin concentrations and intake of fruits in relation to IGFBP-3 concentrations are more in line with current thinking of the biological mechanism. Based on ours and the observations of other studies, one might conclude that carotenoids may contribute to IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 modulation, but this very likely depends on the presence of other factors, many of which are still unrevealed or unknown. Clearly, the results deserve confirmation by further larger studies, for example by intervention study to evaluate whether increased consumption of carotenoid-rich fruits and vegetables is able to modulate circulating levels of components of the IGF system.
Acknowledgements
There were no conflicts of interest.
Supplementary material
For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2016.1.
References
- 1.Daughaday WH & Rotwein P (1989) Insulin-like growth factors I and II. Peptide, messenger ribonucleic acid and gene structures, serum, and tissue concentrations. Endocr Rev 10, 68–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jones JI & Clemmons DR (1995) Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins biological actions. Endocr Rev 16, 3–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Clemmons DR (1991) Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins: roles in regulating IGF physiology. J Dev Physiol 15, 105–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Khandwala HM, McCutcheon IE, Flyvbjerg A, et al. (2000) The effects of insulin-like growth factors on tumorigenesis and neoplastic growth. Endocr Rev 21, 215–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vrieling A (2007) The Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF) System in Breast and Colorectal Carcinogenesis: Dietary Intervention and Molecular Studies. Utrecht: Ponsen & Looijen B.V. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Suzuki K, Ito Y, Hashimoto S, et al. (2009) Association of serum retinol and carotenoids with insulin-like growth factors and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 among control subjects of a nested case–control study in the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 10, Suppl., 29–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Holden JM, Eldridge AL, Beecher GR, et al. (1999) Carotenoid content of U.S. foods: an update of the database. J Food Comp Anal 12, 169–196. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Barua AB, Kostic D & Olson JA (1993) New simplified procedures for the extraction and simultaneous high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of retinol, tocopherols and carotenoids in human serum. J Chromatogr 617, 257–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Khachik F, Beecher GR, Goli MB, et al. (1992) Separation and identification of carotenoids and their oxidation products in the extracts of human plasma. Anal Chem 64, 2111–2122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chew BP & Park JS (2004) Carotenoid action in the immune response. J Nutr 134, 257S–264S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bendich A & Olson JA (1989) Biological actions of carotenoids. FASEB J 3, 1927–1932. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bertram JS (1999) Carotenoids and gene regulation. Nutr Rev 57, 182–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Van Poppel G (1996) Epidemiological evidence for β-carotene in prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease. Eur J Clin Nutr 50, Suppl. 3, 57–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Holick CN, Maichaud DS, Solzenberg-Solomon R, et al. (2002) Dietary carotenoids, serum β-carotene, and retinol and risk of lung cancer in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cohort Study. Am J Epidemiol 156, 536–547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ito Y, Wakai K, Suzuki K, et al. (2003) Serum carotenoids and mortality from lung cancer: a case–control study nested in the Japan Collaborative Cohort (JACC) study. Cancer Sci 94, 57–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ozasa K, Ito Y, Suzuki K, et al. (2005) Serum carotenoids and other antioxidative substances associated with urothelial cancer risk in a nested case–control study in Japanese men. J Urol 173, 1502–1506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Olson JA (1999) Carotenoids In Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease, 9th ed., pp. 525–542 [Shils ME, Olson JA and Shike M, editors]. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mayne ST (1996) β-Carotene, carotenoids, and disease prevention in humans. FASEB J 10, 690–701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Eliassen AH, Hendrickson SJ, Brinton LA, et al. (2012) Circulating carotenoids and risk of breast cancer: pooled analysis of eight prospective studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 104, 1905–1916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Polesel J, Negri E, Serraino D, et al. (2012) Dietary intakes of carotenoids and other nutrients in the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a case–control study in Italy. Br J Cancer 107, 1580–1583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ros MM, Bueno de Mesquita HB, Kampman E, et al. (2012) Plasma carotenoids and vitamin C concentrations and risk of urothelial cell carcinoma in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr 96, 902–910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Miller PE & Snyder DC (2012) Phytochemicals and cancer risk: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutr Clin Pract 27, 599–612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Khachik F, Carvalho L, Bernstein PS, et al. (2002) Chemistry, distribution, and metabolism of tomato carotenoids and their impact on human health. Exp Biol Med 227, 845–851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hadley CW, Miller EC, Schwartz SJ, et al. (2002) Tomatoes, lycopene, and prostate cancer: progress and promise. Exp Biol Med 227, 869–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Giovannucci E (1999) Tomatoes, tomato-based products, lycopene, and cancer: review of the epidemiologic literature. J Natl Cancer Inst 91, 317–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Clinton SK (1998) Lycopene: chemistry, biology, and implications for human health and disease. Nutr Rev 56, 35–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bhuvaneswari V & Nagini S (2005) Lycopene: a review of its potential as an anticancer agent. Curr Med Chem Anticancer Agents 5, 627–635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Voskuil DW, Vrieling A, van't Veer LJ, Kampman E & Rookus MA (2005) The insulin-like growth factor system in cancer prevention: potential of dietary intervention strategies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14, 195–203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu C, Lian F, Smith DE, et al. (2003) Lycopene supplementation inhibits lung squamous metaplasia and induces apoptosis via up-regulating insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 in cigarette smoke-exposed ferrets. Cancer Res 63, 3138–3144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Karas M, Amir H, Fishman D, et al. (2000) Lycopene interferes with cell cycle progression and IGF-I signalling in mammary cancer cells. Nutr Cancer 36, 101–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Levy J, Bosin E, Feldman B, et al. (1995) Lycopene is a more potent inhibitor of human cancer cell proliferation than either α-carotene or β-carotene. Nutr Cancer 24, 257–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Stahl W, von Laar J, Martin HD, et al. (2000) Stimulation of gap junctional communication: comparison of acyclo-retinoic acid and lycopene. Arch Biochem Biophys 373, 271–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhang LX, Cooney RV & Bertram JS (1992) Carotenoids up-regulate connexion43 gene expression independent of their provitamin A or antioxidant properties. Cancer Res 52, 5707–5712. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Aydemir G, Carlsen H, Blomhoff R, et al. (2012) Lycopene induces retinoic acid receptor transcriptional activation in mice. Mol Nutr Food Res 56, 702–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Balmer JE & Blomhoff R (2002) Gene expression regulation by retinoic acid. J Lipid Res 43, 1773–1808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Aydemir G, Kasiri Y, Birta E, et al. (2013) Lycopene-derived bioactive retinoic acid receptors/retinoid-X receptors-activating metabolites may be relevant for lycopene's anti-cancer potential. Mol Nutr Food Res 57, 739–747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.National Center for Health Statistics (1994) Plan and Operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gunter EW, Lewis BL & Koncikowski SM (1996) Laboratory Methods used for the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), 1988–1994. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Berrigan D, Potischmann N, Dodd KW, et al. (2007) Serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin-like growth factor-I binding protein-3: quality control for studies of stored serum. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16, 1017–1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Berrigan D, Potischmann N, Dodd KW, et al. (2009) Race/ethnic variation in serum levels of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 in US adults. Growth Horm IGF Res 19, 146–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shah BV, Barnwell BG & Bieler GS (1995) SUDAAN User's Manual: Software for Analysis of Correlated Data. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mucci LA, Tamimi R, Lagiou P, et al. (2001) Are dietary influences on the risk of prostate cancer mediated through the insulin-like growth factor system? BJU Int 87, 814–820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Riso P, Brusamolino A, Martinetti A, et al. (2006) Effect of a tomato drink intervention on insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 serum levels in healthy subjects. Nutr Cancer 55, 157–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Walfisch S, Walfisch Y, Kirilov E, et al. (2007) Tomato lycopene extract supplementation decreases insulin-like growth factor-I levels in colon cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Prev 16, 298–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Norat T, Dossus L, Rinaldi S, et al. (2007) Diet, serum insulin-like growth factor-I and IGF-binding protein-3 in European women. Eur J Clin Nutr 61, 91–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Maruyama K, Iso H, Ito Y, et al. (2009) Associations of food and nutrient intakes with serum IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-3, TGF-b1, total SOD activity and sFas levels among middle-aged Japanese: The Japan Collaborative Cohort Study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 10, Suppl., 7–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Graydon R, Young IS, Yarnell JW, et al. (2007) Lycopene status is not associated with insulin-like growth factor-I concentration in a healthy male population. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 77, 75–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Holmes MD, Pollak MN, Willett WC, et al. (2002) Dietary correlates of plasma insulin-like growth factor I and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 concentrations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11, 852–861. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Vrieling A, Voskuil DW, Bonfrer JM, et al. (2007) Lycopene supplementation elevates circulating insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1, and 2 concentrations in persons at greater risk of colorectal cancer. Am J Clin Nutr 86, 1456–1462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.McGreevy K, Hoel BD, Lipsitz SR, et al. (2007) Impact of nutrients on insulin-like growth factor-I, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 and their ratio in African American and white males. Public Health Nutr 10, 97–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Colditz GA, et al. (1998) Circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I and risk of breast cancer. Lancet 351, 1393–1396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ma J, Pollak MN, Giovannucci E, et al. (1999) Prospective study of colorectal cancer risk in men and plasma levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein-3. J Natl Cancer Inst 91, 620–625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yu H, Spitz MR, Mistry J, et al. (1999) Plasma levels of insulin-like growth factor-I and lung cancer risk: a case–control analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 91, 151–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cantilena LR, Stukel TA, Greenberg ER, et al. (1992) Diurnal and seasonal variation of five carotenoids measured in human serum. Am J Clin Nutr 55, 659–663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Vrieling A, Voskuil DW, Bueno de Mesquita HB, et al. (2004) Dietary determinants of circulating insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF binding proteins 1, -2 and -3 in women in the Netherlands. Cancer Causes Control 15, 787–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gunnell D, Oliver SE, Peters TJ, et al. (2003) Are diet–prostate cancer associations mediated by the IGF axis? A cross sectional analysis of diet, IGF-I and IGFBP-3 in healthy middle aged men. Br J Cancer 88, 1682–1686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hennekens CH & Buring JE (1987) Epidemiology in Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Nishida C, Uauy R, Kumanyika S, et al. (2004) The Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation on diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: process, product and policy implications. Public Health Nutr 7, 245–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Michels KB (2003) Nutritional epidemiology – past, present, future. Int J Epidemiol 32, 486–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mayne ST (2003) Antioxidant nutrients and chronic disease: use of biomarkers of exposure and oxidative stress status in epidemiologic research. J Nutr 133, 933S–940S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Faupel-Badger JM, Berrigan D, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. (2009) Anthropometric correlates of insulin-like growth factor I and IGF binding protein-3 levels by race/ethnicity and gender. Ann Epidemiol 19, 841–849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yu H, Mistry J, Nicar MJ, et al. (1999) Insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I, free IGF-I and IGF-II) and insulin-like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBP-2, IGFBP-3, IGFBP-6, and ALS) in blood circulation. J Clin Lab Anal 13, 166–172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2016.1.