Abstract
Many new reproductive methods such as artificial insemination, in vitro fertilisation, freezing of human embryos, and surrogate motherhood were at first widely condemned but are now seen in Western society as not just ethically and morally acceptable, but beneficial in that they allow otherwise infertile couples to have children. The idea of human cloning was also quickly condemned but debate is now emerging. This article examines cloning from a Jewish perspective and finds evidence to support the view that there is nothing inherently wrong with the idea of human cloning. A hypothesis is also advanced suggesting that even if a body was cloned, the brain, which is the essence of humanity, would remain unique. This author suggests that the debate should be changed from "Is cloning wrong?" to "When is cloning wrong?".
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Kolata Gina. Scientist reports first cloning ever of adult mammal. N Y Times Web. 1997 Feb 23;:1–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lipschutz J. H., Young P., Taguchi O., Cunha G. R. Urothelial transformation into functional glandular tissue in situ by instructive mesenchymal induction. Kidney Int. 1996 Jan;49(1):59–66. doi: 10.1038/ki.1996.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilmut I., Schnieke A. E., McWhir J., Kind A. J., Campbell K. H. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature. 1997 Feb 27;385(6619):810–813. doi: 10.1038/385810a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]