Skip to main content
Pharmacognosy Reviews logoLink to Pharmacognosy Reviews
. 2016 Jan-Jun;10(19):39–42. doi: 10.4103/0973-7847.176545

Chitosan: A Promising Marine Polysaccharide for Biomedical Research

Mercy Halleluyah Periayah 1, Ahmad Sukari Halim 1,, Arman Zaharil Mat Saad 1
PMCID: PMC4791986  PMID: 27041872

Abstract

Biomaterials created 50 years ago are still receiving considerable attention for their potential to support development in the biomedical field. Diverse naturally obtained polysaccharides supply a broad range of resources applicable in the biomedical field. Lately, chitosan, a marine polysaccharide derived from chitins—which are extracted from the shells of arthropods such as crab, shrimp, and lobster—is becoming the most wanted biopolymer for use toward therapeutic interventions. This is a general short review of chitosan, highlighting the history, properties, chemical structure, processing method, and factors influencing the usage of chitosan derivatives in the biomedical field.

Keywords: Chitosan, history, processing, properties, structure

INTRODUCTION

Biomedical research is comprised of basic, applied, and translational research, normally conducted to support the development and growing body of new therapeutics in the medical field. Basically, biomedical research is a process that aids in the discovery of new medicines and therapies, which demands scientific experimentation, evaluation, and quantification by employing biotechnological techniques.[1] The term “biomaterial” was coined 50 years ago. The study of biomaterial is known as biomaterial science. In a new biological era, biomaterial science embraces the constituents of medicine, biology, chemistry, tissue engineering, and materials science. Based on the American National Institute of Health definition, biomaterials are said to refer to any substance or combination of substances, apart from drugs obtained naturally or modified synthetically, that can be used entirely or partially for the replacement of any tissue, organ, or function of the body. Biomaterials can be used as autograft, allograft, or xenograft transplant material. A successful biomaterial should possess a few important characteristics, such as: Being compatible with the body; being antimicrobial, nontoxic, and noncarcinogenic; promoting better drug delivery; and being inexpensive. Chitosan-derived biomaterials are found to be a very unique marine polysaccharide, and evidently they have variety of physiochemical and biological properties, leading to applicability in various biomedicine-related fields. Although recent discoveries of chitosan biomaterials have heightened the application of chitosan in modern medicine, the involved mechanism of chitosan in all the studies still remains unexplained by researchers. The present short review aims to highlight the history, properties, chemical structure, processing method, and factors influencing the usage of chitosan derivatives in the biomedical field.

HISTORY OF CHITOSAN

Chitosan was first identified and observed in the mushrooms by French Professor Henri Braconnot in 1811. Subsequently, further researches has successfully been conducted by many scientists up to this 20th century. Table 1 clearly depicted the history of chitosan.

Table 1.

Henry Braconnot[2,3]

graphic file with name PRev-10-39-g001.jpg

Chitosan properties

Chitin is a mucopolysaccharide, derived naturally and found to be produced abundantly (second to cellulose) through biosynthesis. Chitins are characterized as white, nonelastic, hard, nitrogenous polysaccharides that have been estimated to be synthesized in approximately one billion tons annually.[4,5] Chitosan is derived from the N-deacetylation form of chitin. Chitosan is composed of β (1→4)-linked 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-β-D-glucose (N-acetylglucosamine). Chitin is structurally identical to cellulose, but it has acetamide groups (-NHCOCH3) at the C2-portion. On the other hand, chitosan is a linear polymer formed by α (1→4)-linked 2-amino-2-deoxy-β-D-glucopyranose and derived by N-deacetylation, characterized by the degree of deacetylation, which is the copolymer of N-acetylglucosamine and glucosamine. Chitosans are the major elements derived from the shells of arthropods such as crabs, shrimps, lobsters, and insects, also produced extracellularly by the cell walls of fungi and brown algae. Chitosan is rarely found in nature but does occur in dimorphic fungi, such as Mucor rouxii, by the action of the deacetylase enzyme on chitin.[6,7,8]

Chitosan is an aminopolysaccharide molecule with a strong positive electrical charge, which strongly attracts and bonds to negatively charged molecules. Chitosan-derived biomaterials have received considerable attention as an antimicrobial, functional, renewable, nontoxic, biocompatible, bioabsorbable, and biodegradable biopolymer agent.[9,10,11] Chitosan is insoluble in water and organic solvents; it is soluble once mixed with acetic, nitric, hydrochloric, perchloric, and phosphoric acids.[12,13,14] The solubility of chitosan derivatives can be observed especially in aqueous acidic solutions, which has a pH ratio lower than 6.5. At the same time, the solubility range also can be altered upon depolymerization, chemical modification of primary and secondary hydroxyl groups. Recently, carboxymethyl chitosan and oligochitosan are becoming widely studied groups due to their characteristics of promising synthesis and rich diversity of applications in biomedical and biopharmaceutical areas of study.[15]

Chemical structure and composition of chitosan

The amine groups in chitosan become protonated at acidic pH and transmit a positive charge to the chitosan chains. Most biological cell surfaces are anionic, and chitosan was thought to strongly adhere to the tissues at the site of a wound via electrostatic interactions due to its cationic characteristics. The solubilization of chitin to produce chitosan in the acidic environment is found to take place via the protonation of an –NH2 function on the C2-position of the D-glucosamine repeat unit, whereby the polysaccharide is able to convert to a polyelectrolyte The chemical structure of chitosan clearly depicted in Figure 1.[16,17]

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The chemical structure of chitosan

Generally, chitosan has three types of reactive functional groups. Its amino groups have both primary and secondary hydroxyl groups at the C2-, C3-, and C6- positions.[18] These are the groups that permit the modification of chitosan-like graft copolymerization for specific applications in the tissue engineering field. The degree of deacetylation (DDA), crystallinity, and molecular weight (MW) are the main aspects in which chitosan can be modified to obtain different physiomechanical properties. Chitosan consists of carbon (44.1%), hydrogen (6.84%), and nitrogen (7.97%), with an average MW of 5.3 × 105 Daltons.[19]

Chitosan chemical properties are insoluble in most solvents but slightly soluble in diluted organic acids such as acetic, lactic, malic, formic, and succinic acids.[20] The usage and benefits of chitosan are limited due to its insolubility in water, high viscosity, and aggregation of the protein molecules at the higher pH levels. Pyrolysis gas chromatography, gel permeation chromatography and ultraviolet spectrophotometry, titration, and separation spectrometry and near-infrared spectroscopy are the specific methods to detect the DDA of chitosan.[21] Commercialized chitosan biomaterials possess DDA greater than 70% and with MW ranging from 1 × 105 Daltons to 1.2 × 106 Daltons.[22] Chitosan derivatives with higher MW are potentially capable of providing better surface and film-forming properties due to its internal hydrogen bonding. Then again, it was reported that chitosan, with higher level of MW, possibly slows drug release.[23] At the same time, chitosan is contains nitrogen in comparison to cellulose and this property highly beneficial for metal chelation and polyoxysalt and film formations compared to cellulose. However, chitosan derivatives also potentially chelate metal ions such as iron, magnesium, and cadmium. The DDA of a chitosan biomaterial is the actual molarity of the glucosamine residue in the polymer chain to indicate the cationic charge on the molecule once diluted in acid solution. This is clearly evident from the proportion of free amino groups in the chitosan biopolymer.[24]

Chitosan processing

The following are some important processes in the production of chitosan biomaterials [Figure 2].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Stages of chitosan processing

Extraction process of chitosan. Chitin is mainly derived from arthropods such as crab and shrimp. Chitin is extracted by acidic treatments to dissolve calcium carbonate, followed by alkali extraction to solubilize proteins. Exoskeleton of arthropods must be (i) decalcified in HCl, (ii) deprotonated in NaOH, and (iii) decolorized in KMnO4 and H2C2O4 to yield chitin. Processed chitin need to be deacetylated in hot, concentrated NaOH to produce chitosan[12,25]

FACTORS INFLUENCING CHITOSAN DERIVATIVES

Many factors and qualities of chitosan derivatives lead them to be recognized as a most significant marine polysaccharide in the biomedical field, such as the following: Biocompatibility, biodegradability, antibacterial, renewability, immunoadjuvant, promoting absorption, bioadhesivity, antithrombogenic, nontoxic, polycationic substance, film-forming, nonallergenic, antifungal, hydrating agent and anticholesteremic agent. Testing the factors-influencing the chitosan biomaterials are the useful experiments to describe or depict the hidden toxic effects of leachable materials or their derivatives, such as residual monomers, catalysts, polymer erosion related properties, chemical compositions, MW, polydispersity, and the degradation ability.[26] Effective alteration by the different level of DDA, crosslinking, MW, polyethylene glycol, wheat germ agglutination therapy, graphene support, viscosity, regularity, nature of bonds, degree of crystallinity, rigorous heat intervention, and oxygenated plasma treatments are noted to play a significant role to address chitosan as a biocompatible and biodegradable biomaterial. The capability and assessment of materials and devices to be used for human biological responses in a specific/necessary situation that does not cause toxic and injurious effects are defined as biocompatible. Researchers demonstrated that the biocompatibility of chitosan scaffolds showed healthy cell morphology and proliferation.[17]

Biodegradation plays a significant role in the metabolic fate of chitosan in the body and it is essential with respect to all the polymers utilized in a drug delivery system and scaffolds in tissue engineering. Due to its systemic absorptions and hydrophilic properties, chitosan is known as a biodegradable biomaterial. Chitosan biomaterials are capable of degrading enzymatically by hydrolyzing glucosamine–glucosamine and N-acetyl-glucosamine–N-acetylglucosamine linkages.[27] Depolymerization via oxidation-reduction reaction and free-radical degradation contribute toward in vivo degradation.[28,29] All of these important properties make the surface-modified chitosan biomaterial an excellent biopolymer that can be readily applied clinically.

As chitosan is a well-known nontoxic biopolymer with antibacterial properties, many studies have been conducted with a different focus in order to highlight the hemocompatibility of chitosan-derived biomaterials. As a result, they were proved to serve as a good hemostatic agent, and chitosan-induced blood coagulum is also generally well accepted. Even though chitosan-based hemostatic agents have been fabricated by blending them with other improved substances under various preparation conditions, to the best of our understanding many research groups still have not completely elucidated the standardized mechanical pathway of chitosan that affects the coagulation cascade.[30,31,32] There are a few important properties involved in determining protein response at the chitosan/biomaterial interfaces, such as membrane surface, topography, hydrophobicity, and charge density. Strong chemical bonds formed between chitosan and the protein will increase its affinity for the surface.[33,34,35,36]

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Chitosan derivatives have been discovered ever since 1859 upon the chemical modification of chitin. Various types and forms of chitosan biomaterials are used in diverse biomedical fields, such as hydrogel, powder, paste, sheet, porous scaffold, solution, sponge, beads, film, fiber, and nanoparticles using their respective methods of processing. Although lately much attention has been paid to these naturally obtained chitosan biomaterials, the mechanical pathways influencing the properties of these chitosans remain undetermined. In the future, more advanced clinical studies on animals and in vitro studies are needed to establish and elucidate the capability of chitosan derivatives. This can rectify the quality of testing and usage of chitosan in human clinical trials.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that no competing interest exists.

ABOUT AUTHORS

graphic file with name PRev-10-39-g004.jpg

Mercy Halleluyah Periayah

Mercy Halleluyah Periayah, has completed her PhD under supervision of Prof. Dr. Ahmad Sukari Halim in Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM). Her research interests are on Hematology, Tissue engineering, Molecular Biology, Material science and reconstructive science fields.

graphic file with name PRev-10-39-g005.jpg

Ahmad Sukari Halim

Ahmad Sukari Halim, presently working as Professor in USM. He is the Dean for the School of Medical Sciences (USM). He is also Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon. He is engaged in the development of chitosan biomaterials and their applications in tissue engineering field. He has published large number of articles on chitosan biomaterials in reputable journals. His research interests are mainly on Tissue engineering, Stem cells, Hematology, Molecular Biology and Reconstructive Science fields.

graphic file with name PRev-10-39-g006.jpg

Arman Zaharil Mat Saad

Arman Zaharil Mat Saad, presently working as Lecturer and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon in USM. He has involved in many clinical researches and played role as research advisor. His research interests are mainly on Tissue engineering, Hematology, Molecular Biology and Reconstructive Science fields.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank and acknowledge Universiti Sains Malaysia for Research Grant (RU) number 1001/PPSP/813068, providing the financial support to publish this article.

REFERENCES

  • 1.The University of New Mexico. New Jersey Association for Biomedical Research. 2014. [Last accessed on 2014 Nov 29]. Available from: http://biology.unm.edu/MARC/what-is-biomedical-research.html .
  • 2.What is Chitosan: Origins of Chitosan. 2014. [Last accessed on 2014 Nov 29]. Available from: http://www.fitnesstipsforlife.com/what-is-chitosan.html .
  • 3.Darmon SE, Rudall KM. Infra-red and x-ray studies of chitin. Disc Faraday Soc. 1950;9:251–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Muzzarelli RA. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press; 1977. Chitin. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Muzzarelli RA, Muzzarelli C. Chitosan chemistry: Relevance to the biomedical sciences. Adv Polym Sci. 2005;186:151–209. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aranaz I, Mengibar M, Harris R, Paňos I, Miralles B, Acosta N, et al. Functional characterization of chitin and chitosan. Curr Chem Biol. 2009;3:203–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Koide SS. Chitin-Chitosan: Properties, benefits and risks. Nutr Res. 1998;18:1091–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kumar MV, Hudson SM. Chitosan. In: Wnek GE, Bowlin GL, editors. Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2004. pp. 310–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Seda Tiğli R, Karakeçili A, Gümüşderelioğlu M. In vitro characterization of chitosan scaffolds: Influence of composition and deacetylation degree. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18:1665–74. doi: 10.1007/s10856-007-3066-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Biagini B, Muzzarelli RA, Giardino R, Castaldini C. Biological materials for wound healing. In: Brine CJ, Sandford PA, Zikakis JP, editors. Advances in Chitin and Chitosan. London, New York: Elsevier; 1992. pp. 16–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang J, Xia W, Liu P, Cheng Q, Tahirou T, Gu W, et al. Chitosan modification and pharmaceutical/biomedical applications. Mar Drugs. 2010;8:1962–87. doi: 10.3390/md8071962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rinaudo M. Chitin and chitosan: Properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2006;31:603–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sankararamakrishnan N, Sanghi R. Preparation and characterization of a novel xanthated chitosan. Carbohydr Polym. 2006;66:160–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kurita K. Chitin and chitosan: Functional biopolymers from marine crustaceans. Mar Biotechnol (NY) 2006;8:203–26. doi: 10.1007/s10126-005-0097-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mourya VK, Inamdar NN, Tiwari A. Carboxymethyl chitosan and its applications. Adv Mat Lett. 2010;1:11–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dash M, Chiellini F, Ottenbrite RM, Chiellini E. Chitosan - A versatile semi-synthetic polymer in biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2011;36:981–1014. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nair LS, Laurencin CT. Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. Prog Polym Sci. 2007;32:762–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xia WS. Physiological activities of chitosan and its application in functional foods. J Chin Inst Food Sci Technol. 2003;3:77–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Soutter W. Chitosan Nanoparticles-Properties and Applications. 2014 [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sannan T, Kurita K, Iwakura Y. Studies on Chitin. V. Kinetics of deacetylation reaction. Polym J. 1977;9:649–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kumar A review of chitin and chitosan applications. Reactiv and functi Polym. 2000;46:1–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li Q, Lunn ET, Grandmason EW, Goosen MF. Lancaster: Technomic Publishing Co; 1997. Applications and Properties of Chitosan; p. 3. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cervera MF, Heinämäki J, Krogars K, Jörgensen AC, Karjalainen M, Colarte AI, et al. Solid-state and mechanical properties of aqueous chitosan-amylose starch films plasticized with polyols. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2004;5:E15. doi: 10.1208/pt050115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shigemasa Y, Matsuura H, Sashiwa H, Saimoto H. Evaluation of different absorbance ratios from infrared spectroscopy for analyzing the degree of deacetylation in chitin. Int J Biol Macromol. 1996;18:237–42. doi: 10.1016/0141-8130(95)01079-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Roberts GA. 1st ed. London: MacMillan; 1992. Chitin Chemistry. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Keong LC, Halim AS. In vitro models in biocompatibility assessment for biomedical-grade chitosan derivatives in wound management. Int J Mol Sci. 2009;10:1300–13. doi: 10.3390/ijms10031300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kean T, Thanou M. Biodegradation, biodistribution and toxicity of chitosan. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009;62:3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hsu SC, Don TM, Chiu WY. Free radical degradation of chitosan with potassium persulfate. Polym Degrad Stab. 2002;75:73–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zoldners J, Kiseleva T, Kaiminsh I. Influence of ascorbic acid on the stability of chitosan solutions. Carbohydr Polym. 2005;60:215–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Okamoto Y, Yano R, Miyatake K, Tomohiro I, Shigemasa Y, Minami S. Effects of chitin and chitosan on blood coagulation. Carbohydr Polym. 2003;53:337–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lord MS, Cheng B, McCarthy SJ, Jung M, Whitelock JM. The modulation of platelet adhesion and activation by chitosan through plasma and extracellular matrix proteins. Biomaterials. 2011;32:6655–62. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yamazaki M. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University; 2007. The Chemical Modification of Chitosan Films for Improved Hemostatic and Bioadhesive Properties. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Corum LE. Utah, USA: University of Utah; 2011. Evaluating Surface Induced Platelet Adhesion and Activation with Surface Patterning and Protein Immobilization Techniques. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gorbet MB, Sefton MV. Biomaterial-associated thrombosis: Roles of coagulation factors, complement, platelets and leukocytes. Biomaterials. 2004;25:5681–703. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schmidt DR, Waldeck H, Kao WJ. Protein adsorption to biomaterials. In: Bizios R, Puleo D, editors. Biological Interactions on Materials Surfaces: Understanding and Controlling Protein, Cell, and Tissue. New York: Springer; 2009. pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Andrade JD, Hlady V. Plasma protein adsorption: The big twelve. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1987;516:158–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb33038.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Pharmacognosy Reviews are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES