Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 1999 Jun;25(3):247–253. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.3.247

Protective truthfulness: the Chinese way of safeguarding patients in informed treatment decisions.

M C Pang 1
PMCID: PMC479218  PMID: 10390681

Abstract

The first part of this paper examines the practice of informed treatment decisions in the protective medical system in China today. The second part examines how health care professionals in China perceive and carry out their responsibilities when relaying information to vulnerable patients, based on the findings of an empirical study that I had undertaken to examine the moral experience of nurses in practice situations. In the Chinese medical ethics tradition, refinement [jing] in skills and sincerity [cheng] in relating to patients are two cardinal virtues that health care professionals are required to possess. This notion of absolute sincerity carries a strong sense of parental protectiveness. The empirical findings reveal that most nurses are ambivalent about telling the truth to patients. Truth-telling would become an insincere act if a patient were to lose hope and confidence in life after learning of his or her disease. In this system of protective medical care, it is arguable as to whose interests are being protected: the patient, the family or the hospital. I would suggest that the interests of the hospital and the family members who legitimately represent the patient's interests are being honoured, but at the expense of the patient's right to know.

Full text

PDF
247

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fan Ruiping. Self-determination vs. family-determination: two incommensurable principles of autonomy: a report from East Asia. Bioethics. 1997 Jul-Oct;11(3-4):309–322. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fox R. C., Swazey J. P. Medical morality is not bioethics--medical ethics in China and the United States. Perspect Biol Med. 1984 Spring;27(3):336–360. doi: 10.1353/pbm.1984.0060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Frisch S. R., Fowler-Graham D., Shannon V., Dembeck P. Maintaining the anonymity of vulnerable subjects. Can J Nurs Res. 1990 Winter;22(4):51–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fulbrook P. Assessing mental competence of patients and relatives. J Adv Nurs. 1994 Sep;20(3):457–461. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb02381.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hu P. The acceptability of active euthanasia in China. Med Law. 1993;12(1-2):47–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Muller J. H., Desmond B. Ethical dilemmas in a cross-cultural context. A Chinese example. West J Med. 1992 Sep;157(3):323–327. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Qiu R. Z. Chinese medical ethics and euthanasia. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Winter;2(1):69–76. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100000657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schutz S. E. Patient involvement in resuscitation decisions. Br J Nurs. 1994 Nov 10;3(20):1075, 1077-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1994.3.20.1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES