Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Res. 2015 Sep 17;75(22):4876–4883. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0556

Multiplex H. pylori serology and risk of gastric cardia and non-cardia adenocarcinomas

Ramin Shakeri 1, Reza Malekzadeh 1,*, Dariush Nasrollahzadeh 2,1, Michael Pawlita 3, Gwen Murphy 4, Farhad Islami 5,1, Masoud Sotoudeh 1, Angelika Michel 3, Arash Etemadi 4,1, Tim Waterboer 3, Hossein Poustchi 6, Paul Brennan 7, Paolo Boffetta 8, Sanford M Dawsey 4, Farin Kamangar 9,1, Christian C Abnet 4,*
PMCID: PMC4792189  NIHMSID: NIHMS728163  PMID: 26383162

Abstract

The reported associations with gastric adenocarcinoma and seropositivity to different H. pylori antigens using multiplex serology have not been consistent across studies. We aimed to investigate the association between fifteen different multiplex serology antigens and the risk of gastric cardia (GCA) and gastric non-cardia (GNCA) adenocarcinomas in northeastern Iran, a population with high rates of gastric adenocarcinoma. We included 272 cases of gastric adenocarcinoma (142 GCA, 103 GNCA, and 27 unspecified) and 524 controls who were individually matched to cases for age, sex, and place of residence in a population-based case-control study. Seropositivity to H. pylori was assessed using both multiplex serology and H. pylori IgG ELISA. 95% of controls were seropositive to H. pylori. Of the 15 antibodies in the multiplex assay, 11 showed no significant association with gastric adenocarcinomas. CagA and VacA were associated with a significantly increased risk of all gastric adenocarcinoma and GNCA in multivariate models. Surprisingly, GroEL and NapA were significantly associated with a reduced risk of these tumors. Only CagA antigen was associated with significantly elevated risk of GCA. We found no associations between H. pylori seropositivity overall either by whole-cell ELISA test or multiplex serology, likely due to the high prevalence of seropositivity. Individual antigen testing showed that CagA positivity was associated with increased risk of both noncardia and cardia adenocarcinoma, which is similar to some other Asian populations, while two antigens were associated with lower risk of gastric cancer. This latter result was unexpected and should be re-tested in other populations.

Introduction

Helicobacter pylori infection is the most important cause of gastric adenocarcinoma(1, 2), which is the 3rd leading cause of cancer death worldwide(3). However, the progression from H. pylori infection to cancer depends on several factors including virulence of H. pylori strain, anatomic subsite of infection in the stomach, other environmental factors, and host genetics(4).

With regards to anatomic subsite and geography, most Western studies have shown that H. pylori is a strong risk factor for noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma, whereas it is either not associated with, or is associated with a lower risk of cardia gastric adenocarcinoma(5, 6). By contrast, in some high-risk areas of the world for esophageal cancer, such as the Taihang Mountain region of China, H. pylori seropositivity is associated with modest increases in the risk of both cardia and noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma(7, 8). Because many of these populations have high infection rates, the risks associated with infection can appear smaller than in populations with lower infection rates. Genetic diversity of H. pylori strains may also play a role in these different patterns(9, 10). H. pylori strains carrying cytotoxin associated gene A (cagA)(11, 12) and vacuolating toxin (vacA) are more virulent than strains lacking these genes(13, 14). In addition to cagA and vacA, H. pylori has many other genetic variations that may confer higher or lower carcinogenic potential. Individual response to various antigenic protein can be assessed using specific serologic tests. The ability to simultaneously test for several of these antibodies was limited until recently. The recent advent of multiplex serology(15) has allowed investigators to efficiently study additional antigens that may be virulence or protective factors for outcomes following H. pylori infection. However, studies using this method have been limited; thus far, only five epidemiologic studies have used this method in relation to gastric adenocarcinoma, and they have found different proteins associated with this disease(1619) and chronic atrophic gastritis(20).

The main aim of this study was to investigate the association between seropositivity to 15 different H. pylori antigens using the multiplex serology method and gastric adenocarcinoma in a previously uninvestigated population with documented high rates of H. pylori infection and gastric cancer. We investigated the results for all gastric adenocarcinoma, as well as by anatomic subsite, i.e., cardia vs. noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma. We also compared the results of the multiplex method with a traditional ELISA assay to detect a history of H. pylori infection.

Methods

Case and control selection

This study had a case-control design. Methodological details have been provided in a previous publication(21). Briefly, incident cases of gastric adenocarcinoma were enrolled from December 2004 to December 2011 in Atrak Clinic, a specialized clinic for upper gastroenterology cancers in Gonbad City, Golestan Province, Iran. All cases underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy by experienced gastroenterologists according to a standard protocol and all included case subjects were pathologically confirmed as adenocarcinomas by experienced pathologists at the Digestive Disease Research Institute (DDRI) laboratory at Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Endoscopy-captured images from the gastric adenocarcinomas were reviewed by an experienced DDRI gastroenterologist and the origin of each tumor was classified as cardia or non-cardia. Esophageal adenocarcinoma cases were distinguished from cardia cancer if the endoscopist reported that the tumor originated from the lower one-third of the esophagus, above the Z line and excluded from the current analysis. When localization of the anatomic origin of a tumor was not possible, the tumor origin was categorized as unspecified.

We selected controls from healthy subjects enrolled in the Golestan Cohort Study (GCS), a cohort study enrolling 50,045 people in Golestan Province(22). Details of the methods of the GCS enrollment and follow-up have been published elsewhere(22). In summary, from January 2004 to June 2008, apparently healthy subjects, ages 40–75 years, were enrolled in the cohort study. We attempted to randomly select two controls from the cohort who were individually matched to each case for age (±5 years), sex, and place of residence (rural / urban). As the cohort study participants were limited to individuals 40–75 years of age at enrollment and to certain areas of the case catchment regions, we were not able to match two controls for all gastric adenocarcinoma cases enrolled in this study. Some cases had more than two controls, because some of the selected controls did not have adequate plasma samples.

Of the initial 331 potentially eligible cases, 59 were excluded because they did not have either serum samples (n = 37) or matched controls (n = 22). The remaining 272 cases were tumors originating in the cardia (n = 142), non-cardia (n = 103), or an unspecified location (n = 27). From these cases, 245 had two, 24 had one, two had 3, and one had 4 controls (a total of 524 controls). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Questionnaires

After obtaining written consent from the study participants, structured and validated questionnaires were administered to case subjects. The lifestyle questionnaire included information on age, sex, ethnicity, place of residence, education, lifelong history of opium and tobacco use and indicators of socioeconomic status such as ownership of automobiles, motorcycles, televisions, refrigerators, freezers, vacuums, and washing machines, as well as house ownership, house size (m2), the presence of an indoor bath, and the occupation of the head of the family. The same questionnaires were administered at the cohort baseline to the cohort participants.

Blood samples

Twelve milliliters of blood was drawn from the case subjects after an overnight fast. This blood sample was taken on the day of endoscopy, before the procedure. Serum samples were separated and immediately stored at −80°C. Controls also provided 10 ml of blood at cohort baseline, from which plasma was separated and stored at −80°C. Serum samples of cases and plasma samples of controls were shipped on dry ice to the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, for the multiplex serology and whole cell ELISA assays(23). A study have also shown that any differences between H. pylori antibody titers in serum and plasma samples are unlikely to be clinically or epidemiologically relevantt(24).

H. pylori multiplex serology test

Multiplex serology is a high-throughput method for detection of antibodies to up to 100 different antigens in large serological studies(25). The method has been described in detail elsewhere(15, 26). Multiplex serology is based on a glutathione S-transferase (GST) capture immunosorbent assay combined with fluorescent-bead technology. 15 H. pylori proteins (GroEL, UreA, HP0231, NapA, HP0305, HpaA, Cagy, CagM, CagA, HyuA, Catalase, VacA, HcpC, Cad and Omp) were bacterially expressed and GST tagged, detailed information about these antibodies has been described elsewhere(15). Antigen specific cut-offs were calculated (mean Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) + 3 standard deviations, excluding positive outliers) in 20 H. pylori negative sera, determined by commercial Ridascreen® Helicobacter IgA, IgG (R-Biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany) ELISA, run within the assay(15). H. pylori positive was defined as those seropositive to ≥4 antigens, based on previously evaluated results against ELISA (sensitivity 89%, specificity 82%) in a German population published studies(15). The assays have been validated for both serum and plasma samples(15, 17). Two of previous case control studies have used serum samples(16, 18) and one prospective study used plasma samples(17).

H. pylori whole-cell antibody test

In addition to the multiplex assay, samples were tested for H. pylori seropositivity using ELISA Kit for IgG antibodies against whole cell H. pylori antigens (Biohit, Finland). H. pylori status was determined according to validated cut off point for Iranian population, which is 9.5 EIU for Biohit ELISA assay(27).

Statistical Analysis

Differences in baseline characteristics between cases and controls were compared using chi square tests (for categorical variables) and t-tests (for continuous variables). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the associations between individual antibodies and risk of cardia, non-cardia, and all gastric adenocarcinomas were estimated using unadjusted and adjusted conditional logistic regression. Using multiple correspondence analyses we created a composite score with socioeconomic data including ownership of automobiles, motorcycles, televisions, computer, refrigerators, freezers, vacuums, and washing machines, as well as house ownership, house size, the presence on an indoor bath, and the occupation of the head of the family in our previous papers(21, 28). The methods for creating this score and its association with cancer risk have been previously published(29).

Multivariable models were adjusted for education (no formal education vs. any), ethnicity (Turkmen vs. non-Turkmen), tobacco use, opium consumption (ever vs. never), and composite SES wealth score as continues variable. Controls were individually matched to cases for age, sex, and place of residence, so we did not include these variables in our risk models.

Phi correlation coefficients and their statistical significance were calculated for dichotomized (positive vs. negative) results of multiplex antibodies that were associated with risk of gastric cancer. Antibody levels were reported as continuous variables, but since they were not normally distributed, we presented correlations using dichotomous nominal variables and phi correlation coefficients. Using the multiplex method, each person was considered H. pylori positive if he/she was seropositive for antibodies to at least four out of the 15 tested antigens(15). We also conducted an exploratory, ad hoc analysis based on the previous findings. In this exploratory analysis, we used combination of CagA and VacA seropositivity as the two established virulence factors for gastric cancer to predict the risk of cancer. Finally, we checked if there is any differences in proportion of antibody positivity or cancer risk between subjects of Turkmen and non-Turkmen ethnicities. All statistical analyses were done using Stata statistical software, version 11 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX).

Results

Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the cases and controls. Overall the proportion of H. pylori positive subjects using multiplex serology assay (94.6% of the controls), was not significantly different from the seropositivity rate using the whole-cell ELISA test (91.8% of the controls) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the cases and matched controls

All gastric1
adenocarcinoma
Matched
controls
Cardia
adenocarcinoma
Matched
controls
Non-cardia
adenocarcinoma
Matched
controls
Number 272 524 142 276 103 195
Age (years), mean (SD) 65.2 (10.8) 63.7 (9.2) 66.3 (11.1) 64.4 (9.1) 64.0 (10.6) 62.8 (9.4)
Female gender, N (%) 69 (25.4) 133 (25.4) 31 (21.8) 63 (22.8) 30 (29.1) 53 (27.2)
Urban residence, N (%) 88 (32.5) 166 (31.7) 47 (33.3) 86 (31.2) 33 (32.0) 61 (31.3)
Ethnicity, N (%)
Turkmen 129 (47.4) 320 (61.1) 82 (57.7) 186 (67.4) 33 (32.0) 101 (51.8)
Fars 56 (20.6) 71 (13.5) 19 (13.4) 33 (11.9) 32 (31.1) 28 (14.4)
Turk 40 (14.7) 65 (12.4) 18 (12.7) 26 (9.4) 17 (16.5) 33 (16.9)
Sistani 27 (9.9) 49 (9.4) 15 (10.6) 25 (9.1) 10 (9.7) 21 (10.8)
Others 20 (7.4) 19 (3.6) 8 (5.6) 6 (2.2) 11 (10.7) 12 (6.1)
Education, N (%)
Some education 46 (16.9) 143 (27.3) 22 (15.5) 80 (29.0) 18 (17.5) 48 (24.6)
No formal education 226 (83.1) 381 (72.7) 120 (84.5) 196 (71.0) 85 (82.5) 147 (75.4)
Tobacco smoking, N (%)
Never 169 (62.1) 340 (64.9) 94 (66.2) 171 (62.0) 58 (56.3) 134 (68.7)
Ever smoker 103 (37.9) 184 (35.1) 48 (33.8) 105 (38.0) 45 (43.7) 61 (31.3)
Opium, N (%)
Never 178 (65.4) 414 (79.0) 98 (69.0) 219 (79.4) 64 (62.1) 154 (79.0)
Ever smoker 94 (34.6) 110 (21.0) 44 (31.0) 57 (20.6) 39 (37.9) 41 (21.0)
Multiplex serology, N (%)
Negative 13 (4.8) 28 (5.3) 7 (4.9) 17 (6.2) 5 (4.9) 8 (4.1)
Positive** 259 (95.2) 496 (94.7) 135 (95.1) 259 (93.8) 98(95.1) 187 (95.9)
H. pylori ELISA, N (%)
Negative 18 (6.6) 43 (8.2) 11 (7.7) 20 (7.3) 6 (5.8) 19 (9.7)
Positive 254 (93.4) 481 (91.8) 131 (92.3) 256 (92.7) 97 (94.2) 176 (90.3)
1

All gastric adenocarcinomas (n = 272) including cardia (n = 142) and non-cardia (n = 103) adenocarcinomas, as well as 27 adenocarcinomas of mixed or unspecified site (with 53 controls);

2

Defined as recognizing antibodies to ≥ 4 antigens.

H. pylori positivity was not significantly associated with cancer (i.e., all gastric, cardia, and noncardia adenocarcinomas) by either multiplex serology or whole-cell ELISA (Table 2). Based on the whole-cell ELISA test, the adjusted ORs (95% CI) were 1.3 (0.7–2.5) for all gastric adenocarcinoma, 1.1 (0.5–2.5) for cardia, and 1.2 (0.4–3.4) for noncardia adenocarcinomas. Using multiplex serology results, the respective point estimates were 1.2 (0.5–2.6), 1.3 (0.4–3.5), and 0.7 (0.2–2.6).

Table 2.

Conditional logistic regression: odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for seropositivity to H. pylori antigens and risk of gastric adenocarcinoma and cardia and non-cardia adenocarcinomas subsites.

All Gastric adenocarcinoma Gastric cardia adenocarcinoma Gastric non-cardia adenocarcinoma
N (%) Controls
N (%)
Unadjusted
OR (95%CI)
Adjusted1
OR (95%CI)
N (%) Controls
N (%)
Unadjusted
OR (95%CI)
Adjusted1
OR (95%CI)
N (%) Controls
N (%)
Unadjusted
OR (95%CI)
Adjusted1 OR
(95%CI)
272 524 142 276 103 195
Whole cell ELISA Neg. 18 (6.6) 43 (8.2) 1 1 11 (7.7) 20 (7.2) 1 1 6 (5.8) 19 (9.7) 1 1
Pos. 254 (93.4) 481 (91.8) 1.2 (0.7–2.2) 1.5 (0.8–2.8) 131 (92.3) 131 (92.8) 0.9 (0.4–1.9) 1.3 (0.5–3.1) 97 (94.2) 176 (90.3) 1.7 (0.6–4.3) 1.3 (0.4–3.7)
H.pylori Multiplex Neg. 13 (4.8) 28 (5.3) 1 1 7 (4.9) 17 (6.2) 1 1 5 (4.9) 8 (4.1) 1 1
Pos. 259 (95.2) 496 (94.7) 1.1 (0.5–2.3) 1.4 (0.6–3.1) 135 (95.1) 259 (93.8) 1.2 (0.5–3.2) 1.7 (0.6–4.8) 98 (95.1) 187 (95.9) 0.8 (0.2–2.7) 0.7 (0.2–2.7)
GroEL Neg. 59 (21.7) 73 (13.9) 1 1 22 (15.5) 34 (12.3) 1 1 32 (31.1) 35 (18.0) 1 1
Pos. 213 (78.3) 451 (86.1) 0.5 (0.3–0.8) 0.6 (0.4–0.9) 120 (84.5) 242 (87.7) 0.7 (0.4–1.3) 0.8 (0.4–1.5) 71 (68.9) 160 (82.1) 0.4 (0.2–0.8) 0.4 (0.2–0.9)
UreA Neg. 139 (51.1) 236 (45.0) 1 1 72 (50.7) 115 (41.7) 1 1 55 (53.4) 96 (49.2) 1 1
Pos. 133 (48.9) 288 (55.0) 0.7 (0.5–1.1) 0.8 (0.5–1.1) 70 (49.3) 161 (58.3) 0.6 (0.4–1.1) 0.6 (0.3–1.1) 48 (46.6) 99 (50.8) 0.8 (0.5–1.4) 0.8 (0.5–1.5)
HP0231 Neg. 140 (51.5) 237 (45.2) 1 1 72 (50.7) 134 (48.6) 1 1 55 (53.4) 81 (41.5) 1 1
Pos. 132 (48.5) 287 (54.8) 0.7 (0.5–1.1) 0.8 (0.6–1.2) 70 (49.3) 142 (51.5) 0.8 (0.5–1.3) 0.9 (0.6–1.4) 48 (46.6) 114 (58.5) 0.6 (0.3–1.1) 0.7 (0.4–1.2)
NapA Neg. 129 (47.4) 175 (33.4) 1 1 57 (40.1) 90 (32.6) 1 1 60 (58.3) 76 (39.0) 1 1
Pos. 143 (52.6) 349 (66.6) 0.5 (0.3–0.7) 0.6 (0.4–0.8) 85 (59.9) 186 (67.4) 0.7 (0.4–1.1) 0.8 (0.5–1.3) 43 (41.8) 119 (61.0) 0.4 (0.2–0.7) 0.4 (0.2–0.8)
HP0305 Neg. 128 (47.1) 242 (46.2) 1 1 69 (48.6) 125 (45.3) 1 1 47 (45.6) 100 (51.3) 1 1
Pos. 144 (52.9) 282 (53.8) 0.9 (0.7–1.3) 1.1 (0.7–1.4) 73 (51.4) 151 (54.7) 0.8 (0.5–1.3) 0.9 (0.5–1.4) 56 (54.4) 95 (48.7) 1.2 (0.7–2.1) 1.3 (0.7–2.2)
HpaA Neg. 204 (75.0) 355 (67.8) 1 1 108 (76.1) 193 (69.9) 1 1 74 (71.8) 126 (64.6) 1 1
Pos. 68 (25.0) 169 (32.3) 0.6 (0.4–0.9) 0.7 (0.5–1.1) 34 (23.9) 83 (30.1) 0.7 (0.4–1.1) 0.6 (0.4–1.1) 29 (28.2) 69 (35.4) 0.6 (0.3–1.1) 0.9 (0.4–1.7)
Cagδ Neg. 96 (35.3) 223 (42.6) 1 1 49 (34.5) 112 (40.6) 1 1 38 (36.9) 88 (45.1) 1 1
Pos. 176 (64.7) 301 (57.4) 1.3 (1.1–1.8) 1.3 (0.9–1.9) 93 (65.5) 164 (59.4) 1.3 (0.8–2.1) 1.5 (0.9–2.4) 65 (63.1) 107 (54.9) 1.3 (0.8–2.2) 1.2 (0.7–2.1)
CagM Neg. 103 (37.9) 227 (43.3) 1 1 55 (38.7) 116 (42.0) 1 1 40 (38.8) 87 (44.6) 1 1
Pos. 169 (62.1) 297 (56.7) 1.2 (0.9–1.7) 1.1 (0.8–1.6) 87 (61.3) 160 (58.0) 1.1 (0.7–1.8) 1.1 (0.6–1.6) 63 (61.2) 108 (55.4) 1.2 (0.7-–2.1) 1.3 (0.7–2.3)
CagA Neg. 28 (10.3) 115 (22.0) 1 1 17 (12.0) 56 (20.3) 1 1 9 (8.7) 47 (24.1) 1 1
Pos. 244 (89.7) 409 (78.1) 2.4 (1.5–3.7) 2.6 (1.6–4.2) 125 (88.0) 220 (79.7) 1.9 (1.1–3.4) 2.1 (1.1–4.1) 94 (91.3) 148 (75.9) 3.1 (1.4–6.5) 3.5 (1.4–8.2)
HyuA Neg. 113 (41.5) 205 (39.1) 1 1 59 (41.6) 98 (35.5) 1 1 43 (41.8) 81 (41.5) 1 1
Pos. 159 (58.5) 319 (60.9) 0.9 (0.6–1.2) 0.8 (0.6–1.1) 83 (58.5) 178 (64.5) 0.7 (0.4–1.1) 0.6 (0.4–1) 60 (58.3) 114 (58.5) 1.1 (0.6–1.6) 0.9 (0.5–1.6)
Catalase Neg. 125 (46.0) 263 (50.2) 1 1 63 (44.4) 143 (51.8) 1 1 47 (45.6) 89 (45.6) 1 1
Pos. 147 (54.0) 261 (49.8) 1.2 (0.8–1.6) 1.1 (0.7–1.5) 79 (55.6) 133 (48.2) 1.4 (0.9–2.1) 1.2 (0.7–1.9) 56 (54.4) 106 (54.4) 0.9 (0.5–1.6) 0.8 (0.4–1.6)
VacA Neg. 65 (23.9) 180 (34.4) 1 1 39 (27.5) 84 (30.4) 1 1 21 (20.4) 74 (38.0) 1 1
Pos. 207 (76.1) 344 (65.7) 1.6 (1.1–2.3) 1.7 (1.1–2.5) 103 (72.5) 192 (69.6) 1.1 (0.7–1.8) 1.1 (0.7–1.9) 82 (79.6) 121 (62.1) 2.4 (1.3–4.4) 2.7 (1.4–5.2)
HcpC Neg. 170 (62.5) 307 (58.6) 1 1 90 (63.4) 159 (57.6) 1 1 65 (63.1) 117 (60.0) 1 1
Pos. 102 (37.5) 217 (41.4) 0.8 (0.6–1.1) 0.9 (0.7–1.3) 52 (36.6) 117 (42.4) 0.7 (0.5–1.1) 0.8 (0.5–1.3) 38 (36.9) 78 (40.0) 0.8 (0.5–1.4) 1.1 (0.6–1.8)
Cad Neg. 140 (51.5) 289 (55.2) 1 1 77 (54.2) 162 (58.7) 1 1 53 (51.5) 100 (51.3) 1 1
Pos. 132 (48.5) 235 (44.9) 1.1 (0.8–1.5) 1.3 (0.9–1.7) 65 (45.8) 114 (41.3) 1.1 (0.7–1.8) 1.2 (0.8–1.9) 50 (48.5) 95 (48.7) 1.1 (0.6–1.6) 1.1 (0.6–1.9)
Omp Neg. 48 (17.7) 91 (17.4) 1 1 27 (19.0) 47 (17.0) 1 1 18 (17.5) 30 (15.4) 1 1
Pos. 224 (82.4) 433 (82.6) 0.9 (0.6–1.4) 0.9 (0.6–1.5) 115 (81.0) 229 (83.0) 0.8 (0.4–1.4) 0.8 (0.4–1.5) 85 (82.5) 165 (84.6) 0.8 (0.4–1.6) 0.7 (0.3–1.6)
1

Adjusted for education (illiterate vs. otherwise), ethnicity (Turkmen vs. non-Turkmen), tobacco and opium consumption (ever vs. never), and wealth score as continuous variable

The proportions of cases and controls seropositive for each of the 15 H. pylori antigens, and related risk estimates for gastric adenocarcinoma and its subtypes are shown in Table 2. Following multivariable adjustment, 4 of the 15 antibodies, were statistically significantly associated with gastric cancer: GroEL, NapA CagA and VacA. GroEL (OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.2–0.9) and NapA (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.2–0.7) were significantly associated with a reduced risk-, and CagA (OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.4–8.1) and VacA (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.4–5.5) antibodies were associated with a significantly increased risk, of noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma. For gastric cardia adenocarcinoma a single antigen, CagA, was associated with an increased risk of this cancer, (ORs 1.9; 95% CI 1.1–3.7).

The phi coefficient correlations between CagA, VacA, NapA and GroEL, the four antibodies that were significantly associated (positively or inversely) with risk of all gastric adenocarcinoma are shown in Table 3. There was a weak positive correlation between the presence of CagA and VacA (phi = 0.29, p-value< 0.001), CagA and GroEL (phi =0.16, p-value< 0.001), VacA and GroEL (phi =0.12, p-value= 0.001) and NapA and GroEL (phi =0.32, p-value <0.001). Presence of NapA was not significantly correlated with either CagA (phi = -0.04) or VacA (phi = 0.02). (Pearson correlation coefficients are also presented in Supplemental Table 1).

Table 3.

Phi Correlation coefficients between CagA, VacA, NapA and GroEL among controls

CagA
(p-value)
VacA
(p-value)
GroEL
(p-value)
NapA
(p-value)
CagA 1
VacA 0.27 (p<0.001) 1
GroEL 0.17 (p<0.001) 0.13 (p<0.01) 1
NapA −0.02 (p=0.590) 0.04 (p=0.341) 0.32 (p<0.001) 1

We investigated the combination of CagA and VacA seropositivity as the two more established virulence factors for gastric cancer and found that positivity to either antigen alone did not associate with increased risk of gastric cancer whereas double seropositivity did, although the estimate for cardia cancer was not statistically significant. A test of heterogeneity between these two end points has p=0.061. (Table 4).

Table 4.

Association between combinations of CagA with VacA seropositivity and risk of gastric adenocarcinoma and its subtypes.

All gastric
adenocarcinoma
N (%)
Controls
N (%)
Adjusted1 OR
(95%CI)
GCA
N (%)
Controls
N (%)
Adjusted1 OR
(95%CI)
GNCA
N (%)
Controls
N (%)
Adjusted1
OR (95%CI)
No CagA or VacA 17 (6.3) 68 (13.0) Reference 12 (8.5) 30 (10.9) Reference 5 (4.9) 33 (16.9) Reference
VacA only 11 (4.0) 47 (9.0) 0.8 (0.3–2.1) 5 (3.5) 26 (9.4) 0.4 (0.1–1.5) 4 (3.9) 14 (7.2) 1.4 (0.2–7.9)
CagA only 48 (17.6) 112 (21.4) 1.6 (0.8–3.3) 27 (19.0) 54 (19.6) 1.2 (0.5–3.1) 16 (15.5) 41 (21.0) 2.1 (0.6–7.1)
Both CagA and VacA 196 (72.1) 297 (56.6) 2.8 (1.4–5.3) 98 (69.0) 166 (60.1) 1.6 (0.7–3.8) 78 (75.7) 107 (54.9) 5.1 (1.6–15.9)
1

Conditional logistic regression, adjusted for education (illiterate vs. otherwise), ethnicity (Turkmen vs. non-Turkmen), tobacco and opium consumption (ever vs. never), and wealth score as continuous variable.

Finally, we examined whether or not antibody positivity or cancer risk differed between subjects of Turkmen and non-Turkmen ethnicity. We found no significant differences between the two groups. For example, 95.0% of Turkmen and 94.1% of non-Turkmen controls were seropositive by the multiplex serology test. For gastric cancer risk, CagA positivity conveyed OR (95% CIs) for Turkmen and non-Turkmen of 5.1 (2.1–13.3) and 3.2 (1.3–7.8), respectively and the test for heterogeneity has P=0.49.

Discussion

In this case-control study, we found no association between H. pylori seropositivity (either by whole-cell ELISA test or multiplex serology) and gastric (cardia or non-cardia) adenocarcinoma risk, but this is likely due to limited power to detect an association in a population where 95% of controls were seropositive. However, we found that seropositivity to CagA was associated with a significantly increased risk of gastric cardia and non-cardia adenocarcinoma and a significant association between seropositivity to VacA antigen and risk of gastric non-cardia adenocarcinoma. Co-seropositivity to these two established virulence factors showed different patterns of association in cardia and noncardia gastric cancers. We also had an unexpected finding that seropositivity to two antigens, NapA and GroEL, were associated with reduced risk of gastric cancer.

Golestan Province has very high rates of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(30), and high rates of gastric adenocarcinoma with a predominance of cardia adenocarcinomas(31). The Taihang mountain region of China also has concurrent high incidence of ESCC and GCC.(32) Previous studies of H. pylori seropositivity in the Taihang Mountains have shown modest, but statistically significant, increased risks for both gastric cardia and non-cardia adenocarcinoma(7). This is in contrast to other parts of the world, particularly Western countries, where H. pylori is strongly associated with non-cardia adenocarcinoma but is either not associated or inversely associated with cardia adenocarcinoma risk(6, 3335). A recent meta-analysis found a positive association between H. pylori infection and gastric cardia cancer in geographic regions with high incidence of gastric cardia cancer(36). Our results from Northeastern Iran are similar to those of studies conducted in the Taihang Mountains. We note there are other similarities between these regions including low SES, historically poor diets and both showing including increased risks conveyed by poor oral health(28, 37).

Other environmental or dietary factors, such as low iron availability, could lead to higher expression of CagA, VacA, urease, HopQ and flagellar proteins and enhance the virulence of H. pylori(38). Similar, but inverse, effects occur when zinc is limited(39). Dietary habits such as high consumption of salt, proteins or nitrite have also been linked to the pathogenicity of H. pylori(40). Furthermore, conditions in the stomach environment, such as altered pH, could facilitate colonization of the bacteria. Taken together these results suggest that differences in associations between populations could be due to a number of environmental factors(41).

Our results may lend support to the hypothesis that there may be two distinct types of cardia cancer, one resembling noncardia adenocarcinoma, and associated with H. pylori-related atrophic gastritis (such as the current study and in the Taihang Mountains), and another which arises from non-atrophic gastric mucosa and is associated with gastro esophageal reflux disease, like esophageal adenocarcinoma (such as is typically seen in Western studies(42, 43)). These differences may be due to differences in the genetics of H. pylori in these populations compared to other geographic regions. We would expect, but have not tested, that based on genetic studies of 7 modern H. pylori populations, our population would likely carry hpAsia2, which differs from hpEastAsia and hpEurope(44). Detailed comparisons of the H. pylori genetics in Iran, China, and Western countries will be necessary to address this hypothesis.

Alternatively, these differences could be due to host genetics. Currently, there is only limited information on the genomes of the people inhabiting this portion of Iran and our study included multiple distinct ethnic groups, including Turkmen of central Asian descent and non-Turkmen that are primarily of Indo-European descent. We note that recent reports from GWAS studies have identified some differences in genetic predisposition for gastric cancer between Asian and Caucasian subjects(45). We did not observe significant difference in H. pylori virulence factors between or cancer risk between ethnicities in our population, therefore it seems less likely that population differences are a primary reason of our findings with regard to H. pylori seropositivity and risk of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma.

Surprisingly, GroEL and NapA were inversely associated with risk of gastric non-cardia adenocarcinoma in our study, which has not previously been reported(1619) (Table 5). GroEL is a heat shock protein, which mediates protein folding(46, 47) especially misfolded proteins under stress conditions(25). It is also associated with the adhesion of H. pylori to human gastric epithelial cells(48) and the induction of inflammatory responses(49). NapA is neutrophil-activating protein and antagonizes oxidative stress(50) and mediates the binding of H. pylori to the host cell and stomach mucus(51). A study of GNCA in the Taihung Mountains did not observe inverse associations for these antigens, but did report an inverse association for CagM(19).

Table 5.

Association of seropositivity to H. pylori antigens and non-cardia adenocarcinoma in different populations.

Study area/ design Adjusted OR (95% CI) Others antigens with significant associations
CagA VacA GroEL NapA
1Iran/Case-control (present study) 3.5 (1.4–8.2) 2.7 (1.4–5.2) 0.4 (0.2–0.9) 0.4 (0.2–0.8) None
2China, Shanghai/Nested Case-control(17) 3.3 (1.1–10.1) 2.1 (1.2–3.8) 1.2 (0.7–2.1) 1.3 (0.8–1.9) Omp, HP0305,HpaA
3Germany/Case-control(18) 5.6 (3.2–9.9) 2.1 (1.3–3.5) 4.6 (2.5–8.5) 1.4 (0.9–2.2) HcpC,Catalase,HP0305, Cagδ, HyuA
4Sweden/Case-control(16) 9.2 (5.3–15.8) 3.5 (2.3–5.5) 6.6 (3.7–11.7) 3.4 (2.1–5.4) All others except HP0305
5China, Linxian /cohort(19) 2.1 (1.4–2.8) 1.9 (1.3–2.7) 1.5 (1.1–2.1) 1.1 (0.8–1.4) HcpC and HP0305; only Cag M had inverse association

Adjusted for:

1

education, ethnicity, tobacco and opium consumption, and wealth score.

2

age, date and time of sample collection; time interval since last meal and antibiotic use in the past week.

3

age, sex, education, family history of gastric cancer, smoking, and alcohol drinking.

4

age, sex, area of residence, SES, use of tobacco, level of fruit and vegetable consumption, and number of siblings.

5

age at blood draw, sex, ever smoking, alcohol and BMI.

Since CagA and VacA have been associated with higher risk of gastric adenocarcinoma in most previous studies(52) we assume that their association with this cancer is established(13). Therefore, we investigated whether a combination of seropositivity to these two antibodies increases risk beyond seropositivity to each one. Our results show that subjects seropositive for both had the largest OR for gastric noncardia adenocarcinoma, but the association in the cardia was more modest than when examining CagA alone. This difference may be due to chance, but deserves further exploration when other GCC data sets become available.

To our knowledge, our study is the first to assess seropositivity to 15 different H. pylori antigens and their association with both cardia and non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma. Strengths of our study include enrolling biopsy-proven gastric adenocarcinoma cases and population-based controls(53), and administration of a reliable and validated questionnaire. Our study also has some limitations. We did not collect information on prior attempts at H. pylori eradication in individuals. However, we do not believe that eradication therapy could have substantially changed our estimates, as eradication therapy is not a public health campaign in this population. Furthermore, our retrospective design has some inherent limitations. We collected samples from cases at the time of diagnosis and cancer. Prior cohort studies of H. pylori seropositivity and gastric cancer risk(6, 7) have not reported differences by follow-up time, but a diminution of effect remains possible if subjects with advanced atrophic gastritis lose H. pylori infection and conversion to seronegativity may be antigen dependent leading to unexpected alterations in apparent risk associations. This limitation might affect our secondary findings on GroEL and NapA.

In conclusion, in our population-based case-control study of gastric adenocarcinoma risk in Northeastern Iran we found that seropositivity to CagA H. pylori antigen was associated with increased risk of both non-cardia and cardia gastric adenocarcinoma, while seropositivity to VacA was also associated with an increased risk of gastric non-cardia cancer. We also found that seropositivity to GroEL and NapA may be associated with a lower risk of non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma. Further investigations of the association of individual antibodies, using the multiplex method, with risk of gastric adenocarcinoma in different regions of the world are needed to assess the robustness of these findings.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgments

Funding: This study was partly supported by Grant no. 82-603 from DDRI/TUMS. It was also funded in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute, NIH.

We thank the study participants for their cooperation over many years. We also thank the Iranian Social Security Organization for their strong local support. We especially thank and appreciate Atrak Clinic staff. We sincerely thank the local health networks and health workers (Behvarzes) in the study area for their assistance in the recruitment of study subjects.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: None declared.

References

  • 1.El-Omar EM, Chow WH, Rabkin CS. Gastric cancer and H.pylori: Host genetics open the way. Gastroenterology. 2001;121(4):1002–1004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Parkin DM. The global health burden of infection-associated cancers in the year 2002. Int J Cancer. 2006;118(12):3030–3044. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1. 0. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase. 2013(11) doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lochhead P, El-Omar EM. Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cancer. Best practice & research Clinical gastroenterology. 2007;21(2):281–297. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2007.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Webb PM, Law M, Varghese C, Forman D, Yuan JM, Yu M, et al. Gastric cancer and Helicobacter pylori: a combined analysis of 12 case control studies nested within prospective cohorts. Gut. 2001;49(3):347–353. doi: 10.1136/gut.49.3.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kamangar F, Dawsey SM, Blaser MJ, Perez-Perez GI, Pietinen P, Newschaffer CJ, et al. Opposing risks of gastric cardia and noncardia gastric adenocarcinomas associated with Helicobacter pylori seropositivity. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(20):1445–1452. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kamangar F, Qiao YL, Blaser MJ, Sun XD, Katki H, Fan JH, et al. Helicobacter pylori and oesophageal and gastric cancers in a prospective study in China. Br J Cancer. 2007;96(1):172–176. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McColl KE. Cancer of the gastric cardia. Best practice & research Clinical gastroenterology. 2006;20(4):687–696. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2006.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Blaser MJ, Berg DE. Helicobacter pylori genetic diversity and risk of human disease. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2001;107(7):767–773. doi: 10.1172/JCI12672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wroblewski LE, Peek RM, Jr, Wilson KT. Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer: factors that modulate disease risk. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2010;23(4):713–739. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00011-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McColl KE, El-Omar E. How does H. pylori infection cause gastric cancer? The Keio journal of medicine. 2002;51(Suppl 2):53–56. doi: 10.2302/kjm.51.supplement2_53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kuipers EJ, Perez-Perez GI, Meuwissen SG, Blaser MJ. Helicobacter pylori and atrophic gastritis: importance of the cagA status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(23):1777–1780. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.23.1777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ki MR, Hwang M, Kim AY, Lee EM, Lee EJ, Lee MM, et al. Role of vacuolating cytotoxin VacA and cytotoxin-associated antigen CagA of Helicobacter pylori in the progression of gastric cancer. Molecular and cellular biochemistry. 2014;396(1–2):23–32. doi: 10.1007/s11010-014-2138-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Atherton JC, Cao P, Peek RM, Jr, Tummuru MK, Blaser MJ, Cover TL. Mosaicism in vacuolating cytotoxin alleles of Helicobacter pylori. Association of specific vacA types with cytotoxin production and peptic ulceration. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(30):17771–17777. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.30.17771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Michel A, Waterboer T, Kist M, Pawlita M. Helicobacter pylori Multiplex Serology. Helicobacter. 2009;14(6):525–535. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2009.00723.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Song H, Michel A, Nyren O, Ekstrom AM, Pawlita M, Ye W. A CagA-independent cluster of antigens related to the risk of noncardia gastric cancer: associations between Helicobacter pylori antibodies and gastric adenocarcinoma explored by multiplex serology. Int J Cancer. 2014;134(12):2942–2950. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Epplein M, Zheng W, Xiang YB, Peek RM, Jr, Li H, Correa P, et al. Prospective study of Helicobacter pylori biomarkers for gastric cancer risk among Chinese men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21(12):2185–2192. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0792-T. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gao L, Michel A, Weck MN, Arndt V, Pawlita M, Brenner H. Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cancer risk: evaluation of 15 H. pylori proteins determined by novel multiplex serology. Cancer Res. 2009;69(15):6164–6170. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Murphy G, Freedman ND, Michel A, Fan JH, Taylor PR, Pawlita M, et al. Prospective study of Helicobacter pylori antigens and gastric noncardia cancer risk in the nutrition intervention trial cohort. Int J Cancer. 2015 doi: 10.1002/ijc.29543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gao L, Weck MN, Michel A, Pawlita M, Brenner H. Association between Chronic Atrophic Gastritis and Serum Antibodies to 15 Helicobacter pylori Proteins Measured by Multiplex Serology. Cancer Research. 2009;69(7):2973–2980. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shakeri R, Malekzadeh R, Etemadi A, Nasrollahzadeh D, Aghcheli K, Sotoudeh M, et al. Opium; an emerging risk factor for gastric adenocarcinoma. International Journal of Cancer. 2013 doi: 10.1002/ijc.28018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pourshams A, Khademi H, Malekshah AF, Islami F, Nouraei M, Sadjadi AR, et al. Cohort Profile: The Golestan Cohort Studya prospective study of oesophageal cancer in northern Iran. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(1):52–59. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Siev M, Yu X, Prados-Rosales R, Martiniuk FT, Casadevall A, Achkar JM. Correlation between serum and plasma antibody titers to mycobacterial antigens. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2011;18(1):173–175. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00325-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pearce DC, Peach HG, Farish SJ. Helicobacter pylori antibody titres in serum, plasma and successively thawed specimens: implications for epidemiological and clinical studies. Journal of clinical pathology. 1996;49(12):1017–1019. doi: 10.1136/jcp.49.12.1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Michel A, Pawlita M, Boeing H, Gissmann L, Waterboer T. Helicobacter pylori antibody patterns in Germany: a cross-sectional population study. Gut pathogens. 2014;6:10. doi: 10.1186/1757-4749-6-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Waterboer T, Sehr P, Michael KM, Franceschi S, Nieland JD, Joos TO, et al. Multiplex human papillomavirus serology based on in situ-purified glutathione s-transferase fusion proteins. Clin Chem. 2005;51(10):1845–1853. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.052381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Talebkhan Y, Mohammadi M, Khalili G, Sheykholeslami A, Rakhshani N, Mahboudi F, et al. Detection of Helicobacter pylori infection by imported IgG ELISA kits in comparison with Iranian home made kit. Govaresh. 2006;11(2):120–125. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shakeri R, Malekzadeh R, Etemadi A, Nasrollahzadeh D, Abedi-Ardekani B, Khoshnia M, et al. Association of tooth loss and oral hygiene with risk of gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2013;6(5):477–482. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-12-0491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Islami F, Kamangar F, Nasrollahzadeh D, Aghcheli K, Sotoudeh M, Abedi-Ardekani B, et al. Socio-economic status and oesophageal cancer: results from a population-based case–control study in a high-risk area. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(4):978–988. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kamangar F, Malekzadeh R, Dawsey SM, Saidi F. Esophageal cancer in Northeastern Iran: a review. Arch Iran Med. 2007;10(1):70–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Roshandel G, Sadjadi A, Aarabi M, Keshtkar A, Sedaghat SM, Nouraie SM, et al. Cancer incidence in Golestan Province: report of an ongoing population-based cancer registry in Iran between 2004 and 2008. Arch Iran Med. 2012;15(4):196–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Abnet CC, Freedman ND, Hu N, Wang Z, Yu K, Shu X-O, et al. A shared susceptibility locus in PLCE1 at 10q23 for gastric adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nature genetics. 2010;42(9):764–767. doi: 10.1038/ng.649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Helicobacter, Cancer Collaborative G. Gastric cancer and Helicobacter pylori: a combined analysis of 12 case control studies nested within prospective cohorts. Gut. 2001;49(3):347–353. doi: 10.1136/gut.49.3.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hansen S, Melby KK, Aase S, Jellum E, Vollset SE. Helicobacter pylori infection and risk of cardia cancer and non-cardia gastric cancer. A nested case-control study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999;34(4):353–360. doi: 10.1080/003655299750026353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chow W-H, Blaser MJ, Blot WJ, Gammon MD, Vaughan TL, Risch HA, et al. An inverse relation between cagA+ strains of Helicobacter pylori infection and risk of esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. Cancer research. 1998;58(4):588–590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cavaleiro-Pinto M, Peleteiro B, Lunet N, Barros H. Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cardia cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22(3):375–387. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9707-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Abnet CC, Qiao YL, Mark SD, Dong ZW, Taylor PR, Dawsey SM. Prospective study of tooth loss and incident esophageal and gastric cancers in China. Cancer Cause Control. 2001;12(9):847–854. doi: 10.1023/a:1012290009545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Noto JM, Gaddy JA, Lee JY, Piazuelo MB, Friedman DB, Colvin DC, et al. Iron deficiency accelerates Helicobacter pylori-induced carcinogenesis in rodents and humans. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2013;123(1):479–492. doi: 10.1172/JCI64373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gaddy JA, Radin JN, Loh JT, Piazuelo MB, Kehl-Fie TE, Delgado AG, et al. The host protein calprotectin modulates the Helicobacter pylori cag type IV secretion system via zinc sequestration. PLoS pathogens. 2014;10(10):e1004450. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang Y-W, Eom S-Y, Yim D-H, Song Y-J, Yun H-Y, Park J-S, et al. Evaluation of the relationship between dietary factors, CagA-positive Helicobacter pylori infection, and RUNX3 promoter hypermethylation in gastric cancer tissue. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG. 2013;19(11):1778. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i11.1778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Haley KP, Gaddy JA. Helicobacter pylori: Genomic Insight into the Host-Pathogen Interaction. International journal of genomics. 2015;2015 doi: 10.1155/2015/386905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Derakhshan MH, Malekzadeh R, Watabe H, Yazdanbod A, Fyfe V, Kazemi A, et al. Combination of gastric atrophy, reflux symptoms and histological subtype indicates two distinct aetiologies of gastric cardia cancer. Gut. 2008;57(3):298–305. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.137364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hansen S, Vollset SE, Derakhshan MH, Fyfe V, Melby KK, Aase S, et al. Two distinct aetiologies of cardia cancer; evidence from premorbid serological markers of gastric atrophy and Helicobacter pylori status. Gut. 2007;56(7):918–925. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.114504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yamaoka Y. Mechanisms of disease: Helicobacter pylori virulence factors. Nature reviews Gastroenterology & hepatology. 2010;7(11):629–641. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Helgason H, Rafnar T, Olafsdottir HS, Jonasson JG, Sigurdsson A, Stacey SN, et al. Loss-of-function variants in ATM confer risk of gastric cancer. Nat Genet. 2015 doi: 10.1038/ng.3342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lin Z, Madan D, Rye HS. GroEL stimulates protein folding through forced unfolding. Nature structural & molecular biology. 2008;15(3):303–311. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lin Z, Rye HS. GroEL-mediated protein folding: making the impossible, possible. Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology. 2006;41(4):211–239. doi: 10.1080/10409230600760382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yamaguchi H, Osaki T, Kurihara N, Taguchi H, Hanawa T, Yamamoto T, et al. Heat-shock protein 60 homologue of Helicobacter pylori is associated with adhesion of H. pylori to human gastric epithelial cells. Journal of medical microbiology. 1997;46(10):825–831. doi: 10.1099/00222615-46-10-825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Takenaka R, Yokota K, Ayada K, Mizuno M, Zhao Y, Fujinami Y, et al. Helicobacter pylori heat-shock protein 60 induces inflammatory responses through the Toll-like receptor-triggered pathway in cultured human gastric epithelial cells. Microbiology. 2004;150(12):3913–3922. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27527-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang G, Hong Y, Olczak A, Maier SE, Maier RJ. Dual roles of Helicobacter pylori NapA in inducing and combating oxidative stress. Infection and immunity. 2006;74(12):6839–6846. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00991-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Proença-Modena JL, Acrani GO, Brocchi M. Helicobacter pylori: phenotypes, genotypes and virulence genes. Future microbiology. 2009;4(2):223–240. doi: 10.2217/17460913.4.2.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Maeda S, Ogura K, Yoshida H, Kanai F, Ikenoue T, Kato N, et al. Major virulence factors, VacA and CagA, are commonly positive in Helicobacter pylori isolates in Japan. Gut. 1998;42(3):338–343. doi: 10.1136/gut.42.3.338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Shakeri R, Kamangar F, Nasrollahzadeh D, Nouraie M, Khademi H, Etemadi A, et al. Is opium a real risk factor for esophageal cancer or just a methodological artifact? Hospital and neighborhood controls in case-control studies. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES