Abstract
A number of recent publications by the philosopher David Seedhouse are discussed. Although medicine is an eminently ethical enterprise, the technical and ethical aspects of health care practices can be distinguished, therefore justifying the existence of medical ethics and its teaching as a specific part of every medical curriculum. The goal of teaching medical ethics is to make health care practitioners aware of the essential ethical aspects of their work. Furthermore, the contention that rational bioethics is a fruitless enterprise because it analyses non-rational social events seems neither theoretically tenable nor to be borne out by actual practice. Medical ethics in particular and bioethics in general, constitute a field of expertise that must make itself understandable and convincing to relevant audiences in health care.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Seedhouse D. Against medical ethics: a philosopher's view. Med Educ. 1991 Jul;25(4):280–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00066.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seedhouse D. What I actually said about medical ethics: a brief response to Toon. J Med Ethics. 1995 Feb;21(1):45–48. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seedhouse D. Why bioethicists have nothing useful to say about health care rationing. J Med Ethics. 1995 Oct;21(5):288–291. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.5.288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seedhouse David. Against medical ethics: a response to Cassell. J Med Ethics. 1998 Feb;24(1):13–17. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.1.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szasz T. Routine neonatal circumcision: symbol of the birth of the therapeutic state. J Med Philos. 1996 Apr;21(2):137–148. doi: 10.1093/jmp/21.2.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]